In this comprehensive guide, we compare Deepset and SimplyRetrieve across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.
Overview
When choosing between Deepset and SimplyRetrieve, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose Deepset if: you value mature open-source framework (since 2020)
Choose SimplyRetrieve if: you value completely free and open source
About Deepset
Deepset is open-source framework and enterprise platform for llm orchestration. Deepset is the creator of Haystack, the leading open-source framework for building production-ready LLM applications, and offers an enterprise AI platform for developing and deploying custom AI agents and applications. Founded in 2018, headquartered in Berlin, Germany, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
83/100
Starting Price
Custom
About SimplyRetrieve
SimplyRetrieve is lightweight retrieval-centric generative ai platform. SimplyRetrieve is an open-source tool providing a fully localized, lightweight, and user-friendly GUI and API platform for Retrieval-Centric Generation (RCG). It emphasizes privacy and can run on a single GPU while maintaining clear separation between LLM context interpretation and knowledge memorization. Founded in 2019, headquartered in Tokyo, Japan, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
82/100
Starting Price
Custom
Key Differences at a Glance
In terms of user ratings, both platforms score similarly in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, pricing is comparable. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: AI Development Platform versus RAG Platform. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.
⚠️ What This Comparison Covers
We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.
Detailed Feature Comparison
Deepset
SimplyRetrieve
CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
Gives developers a flexible framework to wire up connectors and process nearly any file type or data source with libraries like Unstructured.
Lets you push content into vector stores such as OpenSearch, Pinecone, Weaviate, or Snowflake—pick the backend that fits best. Learn more
Setup is hands-on, but the payoff is deep, domain-specific customization of your ingestion pipelines.
Uses a hands-on, file-based flow: drop PDFs, text, DOCX, PPTX, HTML, etc. into a folder and run a script to embed them.
A new GUI Knowledge-Base editor lets you add docs on the fly, but there’s no web crawler or auto-refresh yet.
Lets you ingest more than 1,400 file formats—PDF, DOCX, TXT, Markdown, HTML, and many more—via simple drag-and-drop or API.
Crawls entire sites through sitemaps and URLs, automatically indexing public help-desk articles, FAQs, and docs.
Turns multimedia into text on the fly: YouTube videos, podcasts, and other media are auto-transcribed with built-in OCR and speech-to-text.
View Transcription Guide
Connects to Google Drive, SharePoint, Notion, Confluence, HubSpot, and more through API connectors or Zapier.
See Zapier Connectors
Supports both manual uploads and auto-sync retraining, so your knowledge base always stays up to date.
Integrations & Channels
API-first approach—drop the RAG system into your own app through REST endpoints or the Haystack SDK.
Shareable pipeline prototypes are great for demos, but production channels (Slack bots, web chat, etc.) need a bit of custom code. See prototype feature
Ships with a local Gradio GUI and Python scripts for queries—no out-of-the-box Slack or site widget.
Want other channels? Write a small wrapper that forwards messages to your local chatbot.
Embeds easily—a lightweight script or iframe drops the chat widget into any website or mobile app.
Offers ready-made hooks for Slack, Zendesk, Confluence, YouTube, Sharepoint, 100+ more.
Explore API Integrations
Connects with 5,000+ apps via Zapier and webhooks to automate your workflows.
Supports secure deployments with domain allowlisting and a ChatGPT Plugin for private use cases.
Hosted CustomGPT.ai offers hosted MCP Server with support for Claude Web, Claude Desktop, Cursor, ChatGPT, Windsurf, Trae, etc.
Read more here.
Detailed logs integrate with Prometheus, Splunk, and more for deep observability. Monitoring features
An “Analysis” tab shows which docs were pulled and how the query was built; logs print to the console.
No fancy dashboard—add your own logging or monitoring if you need broader stats.
Comes with a real-time analytics dashboard tracking query volumes, token usage, and indexing status.
Lets you export logs and metrics via API to plug into third-party monitoring or BI tools.
Analytics API
Provides detailed insights for troubleshooting and ongoing optimization.
Support & Ecosystem
Lean on the Haystack open-source community (Discord, GitHub) or paid enterprise support. Community insights
Wide ecosystem of vector DBs, model providers, and ML tools means plenty of plug-ins and extensions.
Open-source on GitHub; support is community-driven via issues and lightweight docs.
Smaller ecosystem: you’re free to fork or extend, but there’s no paid SLA or enterprise help desk.
Supplies rich docs, tutorials, cookbooks, and FAQs to get you started fast.
Developer Docs
Offers quick email and in-app chat support—Premium and Enterprise plans add dedicated managers and faster SLAs.
Enterprise Solutions
Benefits from an active user community plus integrations through Zapier and GitHub resources.
Additional Considerations
Perfect for teams that need heavily customized, domain-specific RAG solutions.
Full control and future portability—but expect a steeper learning curve and more dev effort. More details
Great for offline / on-prem labs where data never leaves the server—perfect for tinkering.
Takes more hands-on upkeep and won’t match proprietary giants in sheer capability out of the box.
Slashes engineering overhead with an all-in-one RAG platform—no in-house ML team required.
Gets you to value quickly: launch a functional AI assistant in minutes.
Stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements, so you’re always on the latest tech.
Balances top-tier accuracy with ease of use, perfect for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects.
No- Code Interface & Usability
Deepset Studio offers low-code drag-and-drop, yet it's still aimed at developers and ML engineers.
Non-tech users may need help, and production UIs will be custom-built.
Basic Gradio UI is developer-focused; non-tech users might find the settings overwhelming.
No slick, no-code admin—if you need polish or branding, you'll build your own front end.
Offers a wizard-style web dashboard so non-devs can upload content, brand the widget, and monitor performance.
Supports drag-and-drop uploads, visual theme editing, and in-browser chatbot testing.
User Experience Review
Uses role-based access so business users and devs can collaborate smoothly.
Competitive Positioning
Market position: Developer-first RAG framework (Haystack) with enterprise cloud offering (Deepset Cloud) for heavily customized, domain-specific RAG solutions
Target customers: ML engineers and development teams needing deep RAG customization, enterprises requiring domain-specific solutions with modular pipeline architecture, and organizations wanting future portability with open-source foundation
Key competitors: LangChain/LangSmith, Contextual.ai, Dataworkz, Vectara.ai, and custom implementations using Pinecone/Weaviate
Competitive advantages: Open-source Haystack framework for full portability, model-agnostic with easy model switching via Connections UI, Deepset Studio visual pipeline editor with YAML export for version control, modular components (retriever, reader, reranker) for maximum flexibility, wide ecosystem of vector DB integrations (OpenSearch, Pinecone, Weaviate, Snowflake), and SOC 2/ISO 27001/GDPR/HIPAA compliance with cloud/VPC/on-prem deployment
Pricing advantage: Free Deepset Studio for development, then usage-based Enterprise plans; competitive for teams wanting deep customization without vendor lock-in; best value comes from open-source foundation enabling future migration if needed
Use case fit: Perfect for teams needing heavily customized, domain-specific RAG with multi-hop retrieval and custom rerankers, organizations requiring modular pipeline architecture for complex workflows, and ML engineers wanting developer-friendly APIs with future portability through open-source Haystack foundation
Market position: MIT-licensed open-source local RAG solution running entirely on-premises with open-source LLMs (no cloud dependency), designed for developers and tinkerers
Target customers: Developers experimenting with RAG locally, organizations with strict data isolation requirements (healthcare, government, defense), and teams wanting complete control without cloud costs or vendor dependencies
Key competitors: LangChain/LlamaIndex (frameworks), PrivateGPT, LocalGPT, and cloud RAG platforms for teams needing simplicity
Competitive advantages: Completely free and open-source (MIT license) with no fees or subscriptions, 100% local execution keeping all data on-premises, full control over model choice (any Hugging Face model), Python-based with full source code access for customization, "Retrieval Tuning Module" for transparency into answer generation, and zero external dependencies beyond local compute
Pricing advantage: Completely free with MIT license; only cost is GPU hardware or cloud compute; best value for teams with existing GPU infrastructure wanting to avoid subscription costs; requires technical expertise and hands-on maintenance
Use case fit: Ideal for offline/air-gapped environments requiring complete data isolation (defense, healthcare with strict PHI requirements), developers learning RAG internals and experimenting locally, and organizations with GPU infrastructure wanting zero cloud costs and complete control over LLM stack without vendor dependencies
Market position: Leading all-in-one RAG platform balancing enterprise-grade accuracy with developer-friendly APIs and no-code usability for rapid deployment
Target customers: Mid-market to enterprise organizations needing production-ready AI assistants, development teams wanting robust APIs without building RAG infrastructure, and businesses requiring 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription (YouTube, podcasts)
Key competitors: OpenAI Assistants API, Botsonic, Chatbase.co, Azure AI, and custom RAG implementations using LangChain
Competitive advantages: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling included, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, hosted MCP Server support (Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT), generous data limits (60M words Standard, 300M Premium), and flat monthly pricing without per-query charges
Pricing advantage: Transparent flat-rate pricing at $99/month (Standard) and $449/month (Premium) with generous included limits; no hidden costs for API access, branding removal, or basic features; best value for teams needing both no-code dashboard and developer APIs in one platform
Use case fit: Ideal for businesses needing both rapid no-code deployment and robust API capabilities, organizations handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), teams requiring white-label chatbots with source citations for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects, and companies wanting all-in-one RAG without managing ML infrastructure
A I Models
Model-agnostic architecture: Supports GPT-4, GPT-3.5, Claude (Anthropic), Llama 2, Cohere, and 80+ model providers through unified interface
Easy model switching: Change models via Connections UI with just a few clicks without code changes
Research and analysis: Multi-hop retrieval for complex research questions across large document corpora
Technical documentation: Developer-focused RAG for code documentation, API references, and technical guides
Compliance and legal: HIPAA/GDPR-compliant RAG systems for regulated industries requiring on-prem deployment
Custom AI agents: Build specialized agents with external API calls, tool use, and multi-step reasoning
Enterprise search: Large-scale search across millions of documents with hybrid retrieval and reranking
Future-proof AI: Migrate between LLM providers, vector databases, and hosting options without vendor lock-in
Air-Gapped Environments: Defense, classified research, and secure facilities requiring complete offline operation without external connectivity
Healthcare PHI Compliance: HIPAA-regulated organizations needing 100% data isolation for protected health information
RAG Research & Education: Developers learning RAG internals with full visibility into retrieval and generation processes
Local Experimentation: Prototype RAG applications locally before committing to cloud infrastructure and subscription costs
Data Sovereignty: Organizations with strict data residency requirements preventing cloud storage or processing
Zero-Cost RAG: Teams with existing GPU infrastructure wanting to avoid subscription fees for RAG capabilities
Custom Model Development: Research teams fine-tuning and testing custom LLMs and embedding models for specific domains
Customer support automation: AI assistants handling common queries, reducing support ticket volume, providing 24/7 instant responses with source citations
Internal knowledge management: Employee self-service for HR policies, technical documentation, onboarding materials, company procedures across 1,400+ file formats
Sales enablement: Product information chatbots, lead qualification, customer education with white-labeled widgets on websites and apps
Documentation assistance: Technical docs, help centers, FAQs with automatic website crawling and sitemap indexing
Educational platforms: Course materials, research assistance, student support with multimedia content (YouTube transcriptions, podcasts)
Healthcare information: Patient education, medical knowledge bases (SOC 2 Type II compliant for sensitive data)
Compliance Flexibility: Can be configured to meet HIPAA, FedRAMP, GDPR, or other regulatory requirements through deployment architecture
Encryption: SSL/TLS for data in transit, 256-bit AES encryption for data at rest
SOC 2 Type II certification: Industry-leading security standards with regular third-party audits
Security Certifications
GDPR compliance: Full compliance with European data protection regulations, ensuring data privacy and user rights
Access controls: Role-based access control (RBAC), two-factor authentication (2FA), SSO integration for enterprise security
Data isolation: Customer data stays isolated and private - platform never trains on user data
Domain allowlisting: Ensures chatbot appears only on approved sites for security and brand protection
Secure deployments: ChatGPT Plugin support for private use cases with controlled access
Pricing & Plans
Deepset Studio (Free): Development environment with unlimited files and core features for prototyping
Enterprise pricing: Custom usage-based pricing based on queries, documents indexed, and compute resources
Deployment options pricing: Cloud (managed SaaS), hybrid, or on-premises with separate pricing tiers
No per-seat charges: Usage-based model scales with actual platform usage, not team size
Professional services: Optional consulting, integration support, and custom pipeline development available
Scaling flexibility: Enterprise plans handle huge corpora (millions of documents) and heavy traffic loads
Open-source advantage: Haystack framework free forever - only pay for managed cloud services if needed
Completely Free: MIT open-source license with no subscription fees, API charges, or usage limits
Infrastructure Costs Only: GPU hardware or cloud compute (AWS/GCP/Azure GPU instances) are the only expenses
No Per-Query Charges: Unlimited queries without per-request pricing or rate limits
No Vendor Fees: Zero payments to SaaS providers or LLM API vendors (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)
GPU Requirements: Single GPU sufficient for development; scale hardware based on throughput needs
Open-Source Ecosystem: Leverage free Hugging Face models, FAISS library, and PyTorch without licensing costs
Best Value For: Teams with existing GPU infrastructure or ability to provision cloud GPU instances economically
Standard Plan: $99/month or $89/month annual - 10 custom chatbots, 5,000 items per chatbot, 60 million words per bot, basic helpdesk support, standard security
View Pricing
Premium Plan: $499/month or $449/month annual - 100 custom chatbots, 20,000 items per chatbot, 300 million words per bot, advanced support, enhanced security, additional customization
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing - Comprehensive AI solutions, highest security and compliance, dedicated account managers, custom SSO, token authentication, priority support with faster SLAs
Enterprise Solutions
7-Day Free Trial: Full access to Standard features without charges - available to all users
Annual billing discount: Save 10% by paying upfront annually ($89/mo Standard, $449/mo Premium)
Flat monthly rates: No per-query charges, no hidden costs for API access or white-labeling (included in all plans)
Managed infrastructure: Auto-scaling cloud infrastructure included - no additional hosting or scaling fees
Support & Documentation
Haystack community: Active Discord server and GitHub community (14,000+ stars) with responsive maintainers
Enterprise support tiers: Email, Slack Connect channels, and dedicated support engineers for paid customers
Comprehensive documentation: docs.cloud.deepset.ai with tutorials, API references, and integration guides
Video tutorials: YouTube channel with pipeline building guides and best practices
GitHub examples: Open-source example projects and starter templates for common use cases
Integration ecosystem: Wide community of vector DB providers, model vendors, and tool developers
Professional services: Custom development, architecture consulting, and hands-on implementation support available
GitHub Repository: Open-source at github.com/RCGAI/SimplyRetrieve with code, documentation, and examples
Research Paper: Academic publication on arXiv (2308.03983) explaining RCG approach and architecture
Community Support: GitHub Issues for bug reports, feature requests, and community troubleshooting
Lightweight Documentation: README and docs directory with setup instructions and usage examples
No Paid Support: Community-driven support only; no SLAs or enterprise help desk available
Code Examples: Example scripts and Jupyter notebooks demonstrating core functionality
Academic Background: Built on established libraries (Hugging Face, Gradio, PyTorch, FAISS) with extensive external documentation
Documentation hub: Rich docs, tutorials, cookbooks, FAQs, API references for rapid onboarding
Developer Docs
Email and in-app support: Quick support via email and in-app chat for all users
Premium support: Premium and Enterprise plans include dedicated account managers and faster SLAs
Code samples: Cookbooks, step-by-step guides, and examples for every skill level
API Documentation
Active community: User community plus 5,000+ app integrations through Zapier ecosystem
Regular updates: Platform stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements automatically
Limitations & Considerations
Steeper learning curve: Developer-first platform requires ML/engineering skills - not ideal for non-technical users
Custom UI required: No drag-and-drop chat widget - must build production interfaces from scratch
Hands-on setup: More initial configuration effort compared to plug-and-play SaaS platforms
Deepset Studio limitations: Visual editor still aimed at technical users - requires understanding of RAG concepts
Production readiness: Moving from Studio prototype to production deployment requires additional DevOps work
Enterprise costs: Usage-based pricing can become expensive at high query volumes without careful optimization
Best for technical teams: Maximum value requires ML engineers and developers - not suited for business users seeking no-code solutions
Integration effort: Native integrations like Slack bots require custom code vs turnkey options from competitors
Developer-Only Tool: Requires Python expertise, GPU knowledge, and technical setup—not suitable for non-technical users
GPU Infrastructure Required: Needs dedicated GPU hardware or cloud GPU instances with associated costs and management overhead
Basic UI: Gradio interface is functional but not polished—requires custom front-end development for production use
Limited Scalability: Scaling requires manual infrastructure management and load balancing vs auto-scaling cloud platforms
No Enterprise Features: Missing multi-tenancy, user management, advanced analytics, and production-grade monitoring
Slower Inference: Open-source models on single GPU (few to 10+ seconds per reply) vs sub-second cloud API responses
Manual Knowledge Base Updates: No automatic web crawling, syncing, or scheduled reindexing capabilities
No Pre-Built Integrations: Requires custom development to integrate with Slack, websites, or support platforms
Limited Context Memory: Primarily single-turn Q&A with minimal conversation history retention
Maintenance Burden: User responsible for updates, model management, troubleshooting, and infrastructure maintenance
Managed service approach: Less control over underlying RAG pipeline configuration compared to build-your-own solutions like LangChain
Vendor lock-in: Proprietary platform - migration to alternative RAG solutions requires rebuilding knowledge bases
Model selection: Limited to OpenAI (GPT-5.1 and 4 series) and Anthropic (Claude, opus and sonnet 4.5) - no support for other LLM providers (Cohere, AI21, open-source models)
Pricing at scale: Flat-rate pricing may become expensive for very high-volume use cases (millions of queries/month) compared to pay-per-use models
Customization limits: While highly configurable, some advanced RAG techniques (custom reranking, hybrid search strategies) may not be exposed
Language support: Supports 90+ languages but performance may vary for less common languages or specialized domains
Real-time data: Knowledge bases require re-indexing for updates - not ideal for real-time data requirements (stock prices, live inventory)
Enterprise features: Some advanced features (custom SSO, token authentication) only available on Enterprise plan with custom pricing
Core Agent Features
AI Agents with Haystack: Build LLM-powered autonomous agents that can reason, reflect, and act using tools, data, and critical introspection into their own decision-making processes
Building Agents
Spectrum Approach: Combines structured workflows with autonomous capabilities - AI systems exist on a spectrum between linearity and autonomy based on decision-making capability needs
Agentic Spectrum
Planning Mechanisms: Agents break tasks into steps using chain-of-thought or tree-of-thought planning, enabling complex multi-step reasoning and execution
Dynamic Routing: LLMs serve as "brains" of decision systems, using reasoning capabilities to evaluate and choose among multiple tools, courses of action, databases, and resources based on context and goals
Reflection & Self-Correction: Agents analyze intermediate results through reflection mechanisms, improving accuracy and adapting strategies based on outcomes
Tool Integration: Modular pipeline design allows agents to use retriever, reader, reranker components, external API calls, and custom tools for richer autonomous behavior
Agentic RAG Enhancement: Build agentic RAG pipelines in Deepset Studio that combine graphs, agentic properties, multimodal capabilities, and innovations to significantly reduce inaccurate or misleading information
Agentic RAG Guide
Custom Workflows: Create anything from multi-hop retrieval to custom logic to bespoke prompts - modular components enable building specialized agents for domain-specific autonomous workflows
Retrieval-Centric Generation (RCG): Research-backed approach separating LLM reasoning capabilities from knowledge memorization—more efficient than traditional RAG architectures
Retrieval Tuning Module: Developer-focused transparency layer showing which documents were retrieved, how queries were constructed, and how answers were generated
Knowledge Base Mixing (MoKB): Route queries across multiple selectable knowledge bases with intelligent source selection and weighting
Explicit Prompt Weighting (EPW): Fine-grained control over retrieved knowledge base influence in final answer generation
Single-Turn Q&A Focus: Primarily designed for single-turn question answering—limited multi-turn conversation and context memory
Analysis Tab Transparency: Visual debugging interface showing document retrieval process and query construction for answer inspection
Local Agent Execution: All agent processing happens on-premises with zero external API calls—complete control over agent behavior and data
LIMITATION - No Chatbot UI: Gradio interface for developers only—no polished conversational interface for end users or production deployment
LIMITATION - No Lead Capture: No built-in lead generation, email collection, or CRM integration capabilities—manual implementation required
LIMITATION - No Human Handoff: No escalation workflows, live agent transfer, or fallback mechanisms for complex queries—developer must build these features
LIMITATION - No Multi-Channel Support: No native integrations with Slack, Teams, WhatsApp, or website widgets—requires custom wrapper development
LIMITATION - No Session Management: Stateless interactions without conversation history tracking or multi-turn context retention
Custom AI Agents: Build autonomous agents powered by GPT-4 and Claude that can perform tasks independently and make real-time decisions based on business knowledge
Decision-Support Capabilities: AI agents analyze proprietary data to provide insights, recommendations, and actionable responses specific to your business domain
Multi-Agent Systems: Deploy multiple specialized AI agents that can collaborate and optimize workflows in areas like customer support, sales, and internal knowledge management
Memory & Context Management: Agents maintain conversation history and persistent context for coherent multi-turn interactions
View Agent Documentation
Tool Integration: Agents can trigger actions, integrate with external APIs via webhooks, and connect to 5,000+ apps through Zapier for automated workflows
Hyper-Accurate Responses: Leverages advanced RAG technology and retrieval mechanisms to deliver context-aware, citation-backed responses grounded in your knowledge base
Continuous Learning: Agents improve over time through automatic re-indexing of knowledge sources and integration of new data without manual retraining
R A G-as-a- Service Assessment
Platform Type: HYBRID RAG FRAMEWORK + CLOUD SERVICE - open-source Haystack foundation with enterprise Deepset Cloud offering for heavily customized, domain-specific RAG solutions
Core Architecture: Modular pipeline architecture with retriever + reader + optional reranker components, full control over embedding models, vector databases (OpenSearch, Pinecone, Weaviate, Snowflake), and chunking strategies
Agentic Capabilities: Build autonomous AI agents with planning, routing, reflection mechanisms using Haystack framework - supports agentic RAG pipelines with graphs and multimodal capabilities
Agent Development
Developer Experience: Comprehensive REST API, open-source Haystack SDK, Deepset Studio visual pipeline editor with YAML export for version control - targets ML engineers and development teams
Studio Overview
No-Code Capabilities: Deepset Studio offers drag-and-drop visual editor for pipeline building, but still aimed at developers and ML engineers - not accessible to non-technical users
Target Market: ML engineers and development teams needing deep RAG customization, enterprises requiring domain-specific solutions with modular pipeline architecture, organizations wanting future portability with open-source foundation
RAG Technology Leadership: Advanced RAG with multi-step retrieval, hybrid search (semantic + keyword), custom rerankers for maximum accuracy, model-agnostic support (GPT-4, Llama 2, Claude, Cohere, 80+ providers), and benchmark-proven performance on MTEB
Benchmark Insights
Deployment Flexibility: Free Deepset Studio for development, usage-based Enterprise plans, cloud/VPC/on-prem deployment options, and SOC 2/ISO 27001/GDPR/HIPAA compliance with flexible data residency
Enterprise Readiness: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA compliance, cloud/hybrid/on-prem deployment, no model training on customer data, and comprehensive audit trails
Use Case Fit: Perfect for teams needing heavily customized domain-specific RAG with multi-hop retrieval and custom rerankers, organizations requiring modular pipeline architecture for complex workflows, ML engineers wanting developer-friendly APIs with future portability
Open-Source Advantage: Haystack framework (14,000+ GitHub stars) free forever with full portability - only pay for managed Deepset Cloud services if needed, avoiding vendor lock-in
NOT Suitable For: Non-technical teams seeking turnkey chatbots, business users wanting no-code deployment, organizations needing pre-built chat widgets or Slack/WhatsApp integrations
Competitive Positioning: Competes with LangChain/LangSmith, Contextual.ai, Dataworkz - differentiates through open-source Haystack foundation, model-agnostic flexibility, visual pipeline editor, and wide vector DB ecosystem
Platform Type: NOT A RAG-AS-A-SERVICE PLATFORM - Open-source academic research project for local Retrieval-Centric Generation experimentation and learning
Core Mission: Provide localized, lightweight, user-friendly interface to Retrieval-Centric Generation (RCG) approach for machine learning community exploration and research
Academic Foundation: Published research tool from RCGAI with arXiv paper (2308.03983) explaining RCG methodology and architectural design decisions
Target Market: Researchers, developers, and organizations experimenting with RAG locally without cloud dependencies—NOT commercial service users
Self-Hosted Infrastructure: MIT-licensed tool requiring user-managed GPU hardware or cloud compute—no managed infrastructure, APIs, or service-level agreements
Developer-First Design: Python-based with Gradio GUI and script execution—intended for technical users comfortable with GPU infrastructure and model management
RAG Implementation: Retrieval-Centric Generation (RCG) philosophy emphasizing retrieval over memorization—FAISS vector search with open-source LLMs (WizardVicuna-13B default, any Hugging Face model supported)
API Availability: NO formal REST API or SDKs—interaction via Python scripts and local Gradio interface requiring subprocess calls or custom wrappers
Data Privacy Advantage: 100% local execution with zero external transmission—ideal for classified, PHI, PII, or confidential data requiring air-gapped processing
Pricing Model: Completely free (MIT license) with no subscription fees—only cost is GPU hardware or cloud compute infrastructure
Support Model: Community-driven GitHub Issues and lightweight documentation—no paid support, SLAs, or customer success teams
LIMITATION vs Managed Services: NO managed infrastructure, automatic scaling, production-grade monitoring, enterprise security controls, or commercial support—users responsible for all operational aspects
LIMITATION - No Service Features: NO authentication systems, multi-tenancy, user management, analytics dashboards, or SaaS conveniences—pure research/development tool
Comparison Validity: Architectural comparison to commercial RAG-as-a-Service platforms like CustomGPT.ai is MISLEADING—SimplyRetrieve is open-source research tool for on-premises experimentation, not production service
Use Case Fit: Perfect for offline/air-gapped RAG research, developers learning RAG internals with full transparency, organizations with strict data isolation requirements (defense, healthcare PHI compliance), and teams wanting zero cloud costs with existing GPU infrastructure
Core Architecture: Serverless RAG infrastructure with automatic embedding generation, vector search optimization, and LLM orchestration fully managed behind API endpoints
API-First Design: Comprehensive REST API with well-documented endpoints for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data (1,400+ formats), and querying chat
API Documentation
Developer Experience: Open-source Python SDK (customgpt-client), Postman collections, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, and extensive cookbooks for rapid integration
No-Code Alternative: Wizard-style web dashboard enables non-developers to upload content, brand widgets, and deploy chatbots without touching code
Hybrid Target Market: Serves both developer teams wanting robust APIs AND business users seeking no-code RAG deployment - unique positioning vs pure API platforms (Cohere) or pure no-code tools (Jotform)
RAG Technology Leadership: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, proprietary anti-hallucination mechanisms, and citation-backed responses
Benchmark Details
Deployment Flexibility: Cloud-hosted SaaS with auto-scaling, API integrations, embedded chat widgets, ChatGPT Plugin support, and hosted MCP Server for Claude/Cursor/ChatGPT
Enterprise Readiness: SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling, domain allowlisting, RBAC with 2FA/SSO, and flat-rate pricing without per-query charges
Use Case Fit: Ideal for organizations needing both rapid no-code deployment AND robust API capabilities, teams handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), and businesses requiring production-ready RAG without building ML infrastructure from scratch
Competitive Positioning: Bridges the gap between developer-first platforms (Cohere, Deepset) requiring heavy coding and no-code chatbot builders (Jotform, Kommunicate) lacking API depth - offers best of both worlds
After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both Deepset and SimplyRetrieve are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.
When to Choose Deepset
You value mature open-source framework (since 2020)
Production-ready from day one
Highly modular and customizable
Best For: Mature open-source framework (since 2020)
When to Choose SimplyRetrieve
You value completely free and open source
Strong privacy focus - fully localized
Lightweight - runs on single GPU
Best For: Completely free and open source
Migration & Switching Considerations
Switching between Deepset and SimplyRetrieve requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.
Pricing Comparison Summary
Deepset starts at custom pricing, while SimplyRetrieve begins at custom pricing. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.
Our Recommendation Process
Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality
For most organizations, the decision between Deepset and SimplyRetrieve comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.
📚 Next Steps
Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.
• Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
• Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
• Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
• Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements
Last updated: December 11, 2025 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.
The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.
DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.
People Also Compare
Explore more AI tool comparisons to find the perfect solution for your needs
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...