In this comprehensive guide, we compare Lindy.ai and OpenAI across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.
Overview
When choosing between Lindy.ai and OpenAI, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose Lindy.ai if: you value exceptional no-code usability: 4.9/5 g2 rating, 30-second setup vs 15-60 min with zapier/make
Choose OpenAI if: you value industry-leading model performance
About Lindy.ai
Lindy.ai is ai-powered personal assistant for workflow automation. No-code AI agent platform positioning as 'AI employees' for workflow automation, NOT developer-focused RAG platform. 5,000+ integrations via Pipedream, Claude Sonnet 4.5 default, $5.1M revenue (Oct 2024), 4.9/5 G2 rating. Critical limitation: No public API or SDKs available. Founded in 2023, headquartered in San Francisco, CA, USA, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
81/100
Starting Price
Custom
About OpenAI
OpenAI is leading ai research company and api provider. OpenAI provides state-of-the-art language models and AI capabilities through APIs, including GPT-4, assistants with retrieval capabilities, and various AI tools for developers and enterprises. Founded in 2015, headquartered in San Francisco, CA, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
90/100
Starting Price
Custom
Key Differences at a Glance
In terms of user ratings, OpenAI in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, pricing is comparable. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: AI Assistant versus AI Platform. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.
⚠️ What This Comparison Covers
We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.
Detailed Feature Comparison
Lindy.ai
OpenAI
CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
Document Formats: PDF, DOCX, XLSX, CSV, TXT, HTML with 20MB per-file size limit
Audio Support: Full audio file support with automatic transcription included in workflow
YouTube Integration: Dedicated action for YouTube transcript extraction and processing
Website Crawling: Single page or full-site crawling with automatic link following capability
Cloud Integrations: Google Drive (including shared drives), OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint, Intercom, Freshdesk with automatic syncing
Automatic Refresh: Knowledge bases refresh every 24 hours automatically with manual 'Resync Knowledge Base' actions for immediate updates
Search Constraint: When search fuzziness drops below 100, searches limited to first 1,500 files - meaningful constraint for large enterprise deployments
Marketing vs Reality: Documentation claims 'no limit to data you can feed' but practical constraints exist around character limits and file counts
OpenAI gives you the GPT brains, but no ready-made pipeline for feeding it your documents—if you want RAG, you’ll build it yourself.
The typical recipe: embed your docs with the OpenAI Embeddings API, stash them in a vector DB, then pull back the right chunks at query time.
If you’re using Azure, the “Assistants” preview includes a beta File Search tool that accepts uploads for semantic search, though it’s still minimal and in preview.
You’re in charge of chunking, indexing, and refreshing docs—there’s no turnkey ingestion service straight from OpenAI.
Lets you ingest more than 1,400 file formats—PDF, DOCX, TXT, Markdown, HTML, and many more—via simple drag-and-drop or API.
Crawls entire sites through sitemaps and URLs, automatically indexing public help-desk articles, FAQs, and docs.
Turns multimedia into text on the fly: YouTube videos, podcasts, and other media are auto-transcribed with built-in OCR and speech-to-text.
View Transcription Guide
Connects to Google Drive, SharePoint, Notion, Confluence, HubSpot, and more through API connectors or Zapier.
See Zapier Connectors
Supports both manual uploads and auto-sync retraining, so your knowledge base always stays up to date.
Integrations & Channels
Conservative Marketing: Platform claims '200+ integrations' but actually offers 5,000+ apps via Pipedream Connect partnership
Pre-Built Actions: 2,500+ ready-to-use actions across Pipedream integration ecosystem
Messaging Platforms: Slack (full integration with triggers/actions), WhatsApp (Personal/Business APIs with templates), Microsoft Teams, Telegram, Discord, Twilio SMS
CRM Systems: Salesforce (24 actions, 8 triggers with SOQL/SOSL queries), HubSpot (deep integration for contacts/tickets/deals), Pipedrive, Zoho CRM
Productivity Tools: Notion (16 actions, 7 triggers), Airtable (full CRUD with webhooks), Google Workspace (Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Sheets, Drive complete integration)
Embedding Options: Popup chat widgets, iFrame embeds, unique public links with domain restriction capabilities
Platform Deployment: Specific instructions available for Webflow, WordPress, Squarespace, Wix, Framer implementations
Webhook Support: Inbound webhooks trigger workflows via POST requests with bearer token authentication
HTTP Actions: Call external APIs from within workflows for custom integration needs
OpenAI doesn’t ship Slack bots or website widgets—you wire GPT into those channels yourself (or lean on third-party libraries).
The API is flexible enough to run anywhere, but everything is manual—no out-of-the-box UI or integration connectors.
Plenty of community and partner options exist (Slack GPT bots, Zapier actions, etc.), yet none are first-party OpenAI products.
Bottom line: OpenAI is channel-agnostic—you get the engine and decide where it lives.
Embeds easily—a lightweight script or iframe drops the chat widget into any website or mobile app.
Offers ready-made hooks for Slack, Zendesk, Confluence, YouTube, Sharepoint, 100+ more.
Explore API Integrations
Connects with 5,000+ apps via Zapier and webhooks to automate your workflows.
Supports secure deployments with domain allowlisting and a ChatGPT Plugin for private use cases.
Hosted CustomGPT.ai offers hosted MCP Server with support for Claude Web, Claude Desktop, Cursor, ChatGPT, Windsurf, Trae, etc.
Read more here.
Agent Autonomy Focus: Differentiates through autonomous operation rather than traditional chatbot conversation functionality
Multi-Lingual Support: Voice agents (Gaia) support 30+ languages, transcription covers 50+ languages, text agents operate in 85+ languages with automatic detection
Lead Capture Excellence: Real-time qualification, email/phone validation, firmographic enrichment, UTM attribution, automatic CRM syncing - claims up to 70% higher conversion vs traditional forms
Human Handoff: Configurable escalation conditions with phone agents able to transfer calls directly to human team members with full context
Conversation Memory: Tracks conversation history within and across sessions through memory feature, but differs from typical RAG retrieval - context persists through workflow execution vs vector similarity search
Weekly Digests: Automated email summaries of task usage and agent performance
Agent Evals: Dedicated feature for benchmarking agent performance against quality standards and preventing regression
Workflow-Centric: Emphasizes autonomous task execution over conversational interaction - fundamentally different from chatbot platforms
Assistants API (v2): Build AI assistants with built-in conversation history management, persistent threads, and tool access - removes need to manually track context
Function Calling: Models can describe and invoke external functions/tools - describe structure to Assistant and receive function calls with arguments to execute
Parallel Tool Execution: Assistants access multiple tools simultaneously - Code Interpreter, File Search, and custom functions via function calling in parallel
Built-In Tools: OpenAI-hosted Code Interpreter (Python code execution in sandbox), File Search (retrieval over uploaded files in beta), web search (Responses API only)
Responses API (New 2024): New primitive combining Chat Completions simplicity with Assistants tool-use capabilities - supports web search, file search, computer use
Structured Outputs: Launched June 2024 - strict: true in function definition guarantees arguments match JSON Schema exactly for reliable parsing
Assistants API Deprecation: Plans to deprecate Assistants API after Responses API achieves feature parity - target sunset H1 2026
Custom Tool Integration: Build and host custom tools accessed through function calling - agents can invoke your APIs, databases, services
Multi-Turn Conversations: Assistants maintain conversation state across multiple turns without manual history management
Agent Limitations: Less control vs LangChain/LlamaIndex for complex agentic workflows - simpler assistant paradigm not full autonomous agents
NO Multi-Agent Orchestration: No built-in support for coordinating multiple specialized agents - requires custom implementation
Tool Use Growth: Function calling enables agentic behavior where model decides when to take action vs always responding with text
Custom AI Agents: Build autonomous agents powered by GPT-4 and Claude that can perform tasks independently and make real-time decisions based on business knowledge
Decision-Support Capabilities: AI agents analyze proprietary data to provide insights, recommendations, and actionable responses specific to your business domain
Multi-Agent Systems: Deploy multiple specialized AI agents that can collaborate and optimize workflows in areas like customer support, sales, and internal knowledge management
Memory & Context Management: Agents maintain conversation history and persistent context for coherent multi-turn interactions
View Agent Documentation
Tool Integration: Agents can trigger actions, integrate with external APIs via webhooks, and connect to 5,000+ apps through Zapier for automated workflows
Hyper-Accurate Responses: Leverages advanced RAG technology and retrieval mechanisms to deliver context-aware, citation-backed responses grounded in your knowledge base
Continuous Learning: Agents improve over time through automatic re-indexing of knowledge sources and integration of new data without manual retraining
Customization & Branding
Widget Customization: Display name (e.g., 'Technical Support Assistant'), accent color for brand alignment, logo/icon upload for expanded/collapsed states
Messaging Customization: Custom greeting and callout messages for initial engagement prompts
Domain Restrictions: Specify allowed deployment domains for access control and security
White-Labeling Uncertainty: Documentation doesn't explicitly confirm complete Lindy branding removal - unclear if available outside enterprise agreements
No Deep CSS Control: Limited to essential branding elements vs full CSS customization or brandless deployments on standard plans
Persona Customization: Agent-level prompts define personality, tone, and expertise areas
Settings Context: Persists across all task runs for consistent agent behavior
Per-Run Context: Allows dynamic customization per execution for adaptive responses
Memory Snippets: Learning capability saves preferences like 'Don't schedule meetings before 11am' across all sessions
RBAC Controls: Admins can lock configurations and set credit allocation limits per user or team
No turnkey chat UI to re-skin—if you want a branded front-end, you’ll build it.
System messages help set tone and style, yet a polished white-label chat solution remains a developer project.
ChatGPT custom instructions apply only inside ChatGPT itself, not in an embedded widget.
In short, branding is all on you—the API focuses purely on text generation, with no theming layer.
Fully white-labels the widget—colors, logos, icons, CSS, everything can match your brand.
White-label Options
Provides a no-code dashboard to set welcome messages, bot names, and visual themes.
Lets you shape the AI’s persona and tone using pre-prompts and system instructions.
Uses domain allowlisting to ensure the chatbot appears only on approved sites.
L L M Model Options
Anthropic Claude: Sonnet 4.5 (default - 'almost no one overrides' per Anthropic case study), Sonnet 3.7, Haiku 3.5
Google Gemini: Gemini 2.5 Pro, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Gemini 2.0 Flash for varied performance/cost trade-offs
Default Selection Rationale: Claude Sonnet 4.5 excels at 'navigating ambiguity in large context windows' and handling 'deeply nested data structures requiring nuanced reasoning'
Business Impact: Lindy achieved 10x customer growth after implementing Claude as default LLM
Per-Action Granularity: Users manually select models per workflow step through visual builder interface
Credit Impact: Model selection affects credit consumption - larger models (Sonnet 4.5) consume more credits than smaller models (Haiku 3.5)
No Automatic Routing: No dynamic model switching or automatic model selection based on query complexity
Manual Configuration: Each workflow action requires explicit model selection vs intelligent automatic routing
Choose from GPT-3.5 (including 16k context), GPT-4 (8k / 32k), and newer variants like GPT-4 128k or “GPT-4o.”
It’s an OpenAI-only clubhouse—you can’t swap in Anthropic or other providers within their service.
Frequent releases bring larger context windows and better models, but you stay locked to the OpenAI ecosystem.
No built-in auto-routing between GPT-3.5 and GPT-4—you decide which model to call and when.
Taps into top models—OpenAI’s GPT-5.1 series, GPT-4 series, and even Anthropic’s Claude for enterprise needs (4.5 opus and sonnet, etc ).
Automatically balances cost and performance by picking the right model for each request.
Model Selection Details
Uses proprietary prompt engineering and retrieval tweaks to return high-quality, citation-backed answers.
Handles all model management behind the scenes—no extra API keys or fine-tuning steps for you.
Developer Experience ( A P I & S D Ks)
CRITICAL LIMITATION: Lindy deliberately prioritizes no-code accessibility over developer tooling - most significant gap for RAG platform comparison
NO Public REST API: Cannot manage agents, create workflows, or query knowledge base programmatically
NO GraphQL Endpoint: No alternative API architecture available for data querying
NO Official SDKs: No Python, JavaScript, Ruby, Go, or any other language SDK exists
NO OpenAPI/Swagger: No machine-readable API specification for automated client generation
NO CLI Tools: No command-line interface for automation or scripting
NO Developer Console: No API sandbox or testing environment available
Available Workarounds: Inbound webhooks (external systems trigger workflows via POST with bearer token), HTTP Request actions (call external APIs from workflows), Code Action (run Python/JavaScript in E2B sandboxes ~150ms startup), Callback URLs (bidirectional webhook communication)
Minimal GitHub Presence: github.com/lindy-ai contains only 3 repositories - build caching utility, ML engineer hiring challenge, no public SDKs or integration libraries
Documentation Quality: User-focused Lindy Academy with step-by-step tutorials, but NO API reference, code samples, or technical architecture documentation
Developer Path: For programmatic RAG control, custom retrieval pipelines, or embedding integration - Lindy offers no viable path forward
Excellent docs and official libraries (Python, Node.js, more) make hitting ChatCompletion or Embedding endpoints straightforward.
You still assemble the full RAG pipeline—indexing, retrieval, and prompt assembly—or lean on frameworks like LangChain.
Function calling simplifies prompting, but you’ll write code to store and fetch context data.
Vast community examples and tutorials help, but OpenAI doesn’t ship a reference RAG architecture.
Ships a well-documented REST API for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data, and querying chat.
API Documentation
Backs you up with cookbooks, code samples, and step-by-step guides for every skill level.
Performance & Accuracy
Hybrid Search: Semantic + keyword search with configurable 'Search Fuzziness' (0-100 scale) - at 100 (pure semantic) no file limit, lower values add keyword matching but limit to 1,500 files
Default Results: 4 search results returned (adjustable up to 10 maximum)
Vector Database: NOT disclosed - no documentation mentions Pinecone, Chroma, Qdrant, or any specific vector store
Embedding Models: Undocumented - no information about which embedding models power semantic search
Hallucination Reduction: Architectural constraints vs retrieval optimization - 'poor man's RLHF' with human confirmation before action execution
Learning Integration: Corrections from feedback embedded in vector storage for future retrieval improvement
Structured Workflows: 'Agents on rails' philosophy constrains LLM behavior through predefined workflow steps
NO Published Benchmarks: No RAG accuracy metrics, retrieval precision/recall scores, or latency measurements available
Black Box Implementation: RAG treated as opaque system - no transparency into vector similarity scores, embedding quality, or retrieval mechanisms
Enterprise Concern: Opacity may concern organizations requiring transparency into AI decision-making for compliance or auditing
GPT-4 is top-tier for language tasks, but domain accuracy needs RAG or fine-tuning.
Without retrieval, GPT can hallucinate on brand-new or private info outside its training set.
A well-built RAG layer delivers high accuracy, but indexing, chunking, and prompt design are on you.
Larger models (GPT-4 32k/128k) can add latency, though OpenAI generally scales well under load.
Delivers sub-second replies with an optimized pipeline—efficient vector search, smart chunking, and caching.
Independent tests rate median answer accuracy at 5/5—outpacing many alternatives.
Benchmark Results
Always cites sources so users can verify facts on the spot.
Maintains speed and accuracy even for massive knowledge bases with tens of millions of words.
Customization & Flexibility
Knowledge Updates: Automatic refresh every 24 hours for all connected cloud sources
Manual Resync: 'Resync Knowledge Base' actions available for immediate updates when needed
Cloud Source Syncing: Google Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint, Intercom, Freshdesk automatically stay current
Settings Context: Agent-level configuration persists across all task runs for consistent behavior
Per-Run Context: Dynamic customization per execution allows adaptive agent responses
Memory Snippets: Learning preferences saved across sessions (e.g., scheduling constraints, communication style preferences)
Workflow Customization: Visual builder allows business users to modify agent logic without coding
Agent Personality: Configurable tone, expertise areas, and communication style through prompt configuration
No Embedding Control: Cannot customize embedding models, vector similarity thresholds, or retrieval parameters
Limited Developer Flexibility: Black-box RAG implementation prevents optimization of retrieval pipeline or tuning of vector search
N/A
N/A
Pricing & Scalability
Free Plan: $0/month, 400 credits, 1M character knowledge base, basic automations with 100+ integrations
Pro Plan: $49.99/month, 5,000 credits, 20M character knowledge base, phone calls, full integrations, Lindy branding on embed
Business Plans: $199.99-$299.99/month, 20,000-30,000 credits, 50M character knowledge base, custom branding, 30+ languages, unlimited calls
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing with SSO, SCIM provisioning, dedicated support, custom training
Additional Costs: Phone calls $0.19/minute (GPT-4o), team members $19.99/member/month (Pro/Business), custom automation building $500 one-time, credits $19-$1,199/month (10,000-1,000,000 credits)
Credit Consumption: Varies by model choice and complexity - larger models (Claude Sonnet 4.5) consume more credits than smaller models
Primary User Complaint: Unpredictable costs - credit depletion speed consistently frustrating in reviews, particularly for complex workflows with premium actions
Pricing Transparency Issue: Credit system creates forecasting difficulty vs fixed per-seat or usage-based pricing
Scalability: Character limits constrain large knowledge bases - 50M character cap on Business tier may limit enterprise deployments
Pay-as-you-go token billing: GPT-3.5 is cheap (~$0.0015/1K tokens) while GPT-4 costs more (~$0.03-0.06/1K). [OpenAI API Rates]
Great for low usage, but bills can spike at scale; rate limits also apply.
No flat-rate plan—everything is consumption-based, plus you cover any external hosting (e.g., vector DB). [API Reference]
Enterprise contracts unlock higher concurrency, compliance features, and dedicated capacity after a chat with sales.
Runs on straightforward subscriptions: Standard (~$99/mo), Premium (~$449/mo), and customizable Enterprise plans.
Gives generous limits—Standard covers up to 60 million words per bot, Premium up to 300 million—all at flat monthly rates.
View Pricing
Handles scaling for you: the managed cloud infra auto-scales with demand, keeping things fast and available.
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 Type II: Certified by Johanson Group audit - independently validated security controls
HIPAA Compliant: Business Associate Agreement (BAA) available for healthcare deployments
GDPR Compliant: EU data protection and privacy rights compliance
PIPEDA Compliant: Canadian Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act
CCPA Compliant: California Consumer Privacy Act compliance
No AI Training: Customer data NEVER used for AI model training - explicitly stated in privacy policy
Encryption: AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.2+ in transit for comprehensive data protection
Infrastructure: Google Cloud Platform hosting with multi-zone redundancy for high availability
Backups: Daily encrypted backups with secure key management
Access Controls: RBAC (Role-Based Access Control), MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication), Enterprise SSO via existing identity providers, SCIM provisioning for automated user lifecycle
Audit Logs: Track agent activity, data access, configuration changes - available on Business/Enterprise plans
Data Residency Limitation: US-based only - no explicit EU data residency option documented (enterprise inquiries required for region-specific deployments)
No ISO 27001: Information security management certification not documented
API data isn’t used for training and is deleted after 30 days (abuse checks only). [Data Policy]
Data is encrypted in transit and at rest; ChatGPT Enterprise adds SOC 2, SSO, and stronger privacy guarantees.
Developers must secure user inputs, logs, and compliance (HIPAA, GDPR, etc.) on their side.
No built-in access portal for your users—you build auth in your own front-end.
Protects data in transit with SSL/TLS and at rest with 256-bit AES encryption.
Holds SOC 2 Type II certification and complies with GDPR, so your data stays isolated and private.
Security Certifications
Offers fine-grained access controls—RBAC, two-factor auth, and SSO integration—so only the right people get in.
Error Tracking: Built-in retry mechanisms with detailed failure monitoring and debugging
Trigger History: Task completion logs track every workflow execution and result
Qualification Metrics: Lead conversion rates and response time tracking for sales/marketing workflows
Completion Rates: Workflow success measurement and handling time analysis
Weekly Digests: Automated email summaries of task usage delivered to administrators
Agent Evals: Benchmarking feature against quality standards with regression prevention
Log Retention: 1 day (Free tier - severely constrains troubleshooting) to 30+ days (Enterprise tier)
Audit Logs: User actions, data access, configuration changes tracked on Business/Enterprise plans
Export Capabilities: Available but SIEM integration specifics require sales confirmation
No RAG-Specific Metrics: Cannot track retrieval precision, recall, embedding quality, or vector similarity scores
Workflow-Centric: Focuses on output quality rather than retrieval precision - notable gap for RAG-specific monitoring vs platforms like LangSmith or Arize
A basic dashboard tracks monthly token spend and rate limits in the dev portal.
No conversation-level analytics—you’ll log Q&A traffic yourself.
Status page, error codes, and rate-limit headers help monitor uptime, but no specialized RAG metrics.
Large community shares logging setups (Datadog, Splunk, etc.), yet you build the monitoring pipeline.
Comes with a real-time analytics dashboard tracking query volumes, token usage, and indexing status.
Lets you export logs and metrics via API to plug into third-party monitoring or BI tools.
Analytics API
Provides detailed insights for troubleshooting and ongoing optimization.
Market Differentiation: Computer Use capability unique among no-code automation platforms - significant competitive advantage
N/A
N/A
Additional Considerations
Best Use Cases: Operations teams automating repetitive workflows without developer resources - lead qualification, email triage, meeting scheduling, CRM updates, customer support routing excel
Primary Strength: Zero-training deployment with Agent Builder ('vibe coding') creates sophisticated automations in 30 seconds vs 15-60 minutes with Zapier/Make for equivalent workflows
Unique Capabilities: Autopilot (Computer Use) enables automations impossible through traditional integrations - can interact with any web-based application without published APIs through AI-powered browser control
Multi-Agent Societies: Multiple specialized Lindies collaborate on complex tasks through delegation rules - Sales (SDR → AE → CS), Support (Triage → Technical → Escalation), Research with specialized investigators
Credit-Based Pricing Reality: Most common user complaint is unpredictable costs - 'credits consumed quickly and unpredictably' makes budget forecasting difficult vs fixed per-seat or usage-based pricing in competitors
Enterprise Limitations: Character limits (50M cap on Business tier) may constrain large deployments, US-only data residency blocks EU customers with strict localization requirements, no ISO 27001 certification may limit procurement
Developer Friction: Deliberately prioritizes no-code accessibility over developer tooling - NO public REST API, NO SDKs, NO CLI tools, NO programmatic RAG control makes it unsuitable for API-first use cases
Support Inconsistency: User reviews note 'inconsistent responsiveness on lower tiers' and 'writing to support twice with no response' - support quality varies significantly by plan tier
Platform Comparison Warning: Fundamentally different architecture from RAG-as-a-Service platforms - comparing Lindy to CustomGPT is misleading as they serve different product categories (workflow automation vs knowledge retrieval)
Great when you need maximum freedom to build bespoke AI solutions, or tasks beyond RAG (code gen, creative writing, etc.).
Regular model upgrades and bigger context windows keep the tech cutting-edge.
Best suited to teams comfortable writing code—near-infinite customization comes with setup complexity.
Token pricing is cost-effective at small scale but can climb quickly; maintaining RAG adds ongoing dev effort.
Slashes engineering overhead with an all-in-one RAG platform—no in-house ML team required.
Gets you to value quickly: launch a functional AI assistant in minutes.
Stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements, so you’re always on the latest tech.
Balances top-tier accuracy with ease of use, perfect for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects.
Core Chatbot Features
Chatbot vs Agent Philosophy: Lindy differentiates through autonomous agent operation rather than traditional chatbot conversation - emphasizes task execution over conversational interaction
Multi-Lingual Voice Agents (Gaia): 30+ language support for voice agents, transcription covers 50+ languages, text agents operate in 85+ languages with automatic detection - no manual language configuration required
Lead Capture Excellence: Real-time qualification with email/phone validation, firmographic enrichment, UTM attribution tracking, automatic CRM syncing - claims up to 70% higher conversion vs traditional forms
Human Handoff Logic: Configurable escalation conditions with phone agents able to transfer calls directly to human team members with full conversation context and history preservation
Conversation Memory System: Tracks conversation history within and across sessions through memory feature - context persists through workflow execution vs vector similarity search in traditional RAG systems
Analytics & Performance Tracking: Qualification rates, response times, completion rates, handling times monitored comprehensively with weekly automated email summaries of task usage and agent performance
Agent Evals Feature: Dedicated benchmarking system for measuring agent performance against quality standards and preventing regression over time with automated quality monitoring
Workflow-Centric Design: Emphasizes autonomous task execution over conversational chatbot patterns - structured workflows with 'agents on rails' philosophy constraining LLM behavior through predefined steps
Hallucination Prevention: Architectural constraints vs retrieval optimization - 'poor man's RLHF' with human confirmation before action execution prevents costly mistakes
Learning Integration: Corrections from user feedback embedded in vector storage for future retrieval improvement - system learns from mistakes through Memory Snippets saving preferences like scheduling constraints
GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 handle multi-turn chat as long as you resend the conversation history; OpenAI doesn’t store “agent memory” for you.
Out of the box, GPT has no live data hook—you supply retrieval logic or rely on the model’s built-in knowledge.
“Function calling” lets the model trigger your own functions (like a search endpoint), but you still wire up the retrieval flow.
The ChatGPT web interface is separate from the API and isn’t brand-customizable or tied to your private data by default.
Reduces hallucinations by grounding replies in your data and adding source citations for transparency.
Benchmark Details
Handles multi-turn, context-aware chats with persistent history and solid conversation management.
Speaks 90+ languages, making global rollouts straightforward.
Includes extras like lead capture (email collection) and smooth handoff to a human when needed.
Behavior Customization Layers: Settings Context (agent-level configuration persisting across all task runs), Per-Run Context (dynamic customization per execution for adaptive responses), Memory Snippets (learning preferences saved across sessions)
Workflow Flexibility: Visual builder allows business users to modify agent logic without coding - drag-and-drop interface for conversation flows, conditional logic, API integrations, data transformations
Agent Personality Configuration: Configurable tone, expertise areas, communication style through prompt configuration - define professional vs casual voice, technical depth, response verbosity
Knowledge Base Management: Automatic refresh every 24 hours for all connected cloud sources (Google Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint, Intercom, Freshdesk) with manual 'Resync Knowledge Base' actions for immediate updates
Search Fuzziness Controls: Configurable slider (0-100 scale) balancing semantic vs keyword search - at 100 (pure semantic) no file limit, lower values add keyword matching but constrain to 1,500 files
Retrieval Configuration: Default 4 search results returned (adjustable up to 10 maximum) with hybrid search combining semantic similarity and keyword matching for precision
RBAC Controls: Admins can lock configurations and set credit allocation limits per user or team - prevents unauthorized changes and controls spending across organization
CRITICAL LIMITATION - No Embedding Control: Cannot customize embedding models, vector similarity thresholds, or retrieval parameters - black-box RAG implementation prevents optimization of retrieval pipeline
Developer Flexibility Gap: No programmatic access to knowledge base management, no API for document upload or retrieval configuration, no ability to tune vector search parameters or chunking strategies
You can fine-tune (GPT-3.5) or craft prompts for style, but real-time knowledge injection happens only through your RAG code.
Keeping content fresh means re-embedding, re-fine-tuning, or passing context each call—developer overhead.
Tool calling and moderation are powerful but require thoughtful design; no single UI manages persona or knowledge over time.
Extremely flexible for general AI work, but lacks a built-in document-management layer for live updates.
Lets you add, remove, or tweak content on the fly—automatic re-indexing keeps everything current.
Shapes agent behavior through system prompts and sample Q&A, ensuring a consistent voice and focus.
Learn How to Update Sources
Supports multiple agents per account, so different teams can have their own bots.
Balances hands-on control with smart defaults—no deep ML expertise required to get tailored behavior.
Multi- Agent Collaboration
Societies of Lindies: Multiple specialized agents collaborate on complex tasks through delegation rules
Agent Specialization: Each Lindy can have unique expertise, knowledge base access, and capabilities
Delegation Rules: Define when and how agents hand off tasks to specialized team members
Workflow Orchestration: Coordinate multi-step processes across different agent specializations
Context Preservation: Full conversation and task history passed between collaborating agents
Use Cases: Sales (SDR → Account Executive → Customer Success), Support (Triage → Technical → Escalation), Complex research with specialized investigators
Learning Across Agents: Feedback and corrections shared across agent society for collective improvement
Sophisticated Workflows: Enable enterprise-grade automation previously requiring human coordination
Agent Builder Integration: Natural language creation of multi-agent systems vs manual workflow mapping
N/A
N/A
Lead Capture & Conversion
Real-Time Qualification: AI evaluates lead quality during initial conversation vs post-submission scoring
Email/Phone Validation: Automatic verification prevents fake submissions and improves data quality
Firmographic Enrichment: Company data appended to leads automatically (size, industry, revenue, etc.)
UTM Attribution: Marketing source tracking preserved through entire lead journey
Automatic CRM Syncing: Qualified leads flow directly to Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho without manual data entry
Conversion Claims: Up to 70% higher conversion vs traditional forms (vendor claim - not independently validated)
Conversational Forms: Natural dialogue collection vs static form fields improves completion rates
Routing Logic: Automatically assign leads to appropriate sales reps based on territory, product interest, company size
Follow-Up Automation: Trigger email sequences, meeting scheduling, nurture campaigns based on qualification results
N/A
N/A
R A G-as-a- Service Assessment
Platform Type: NOT A RAG-AS-A-SERVICE PLATFORM - No-code AI agent/workflow automation platform targeting business users vs developers
Critical Distinction: Lindy prioritizes business user accessibility over programmatic RAG control - fundamentally different design philosophy
RAG Implementation: Black-box hybrid search (semantic + keyword) with configurable fuzziness but no exposed retrieval controls
Vector Database: Undisclosed - no documentation of Pinecone, Chroma, Qdrant, or specific vector store
Embedding Models: Undocumented - no information about which models power semantic search
API Availability: NO public REST API, GraphQL endpoint, or official SDKs for programmatic access
Developer Tools: NO OpenAPI spec, CLI tools, developer console, API sandbox, or technical documentation
Benchmarks: No published RAG accuracy, latency, or performance metrics available
Target Audience: Operations teams automating workflows vs developers building custom RAG applications
Use Case Mismatch: Comparing Lindy to CustomGPT.ai is architecturally misleading - fundamentally different product categories serving different user personas
Platform Type: NOT RAG-AS-A-SERVICE - OpenAI provides LLM models and basic tool APIs, not managed RAG infrastructure
Core Focus: Best-in-class language models (GPT-4, GPT-3.5) as building blocks - RAG implementation entirely on developers
DIY RAG Architecture: Typical workflow: embed docs with Embeddings API → store in external vector DB (Pinecone/Weaviate) → retrieve at query time → inject into prompt
File Search Tool (Beta): Azure OpenAI Assistants preview includes minimal File Search for semantic search over uploads - still preview-stage, not production RAG service
No Managed Infrastructure: Unlike true RaaS (CustomGPT, Vectara, Nuclia), OpenAI leaves chunking, indexing, retrieval, vector storage to developers
Framework Integration: Works with LangChain, LlamaIndex for RAG scaffolding - but these are third-party tools, not OpenAI products
Framework vs Service: Comparison to RAG-as-a-Service platforms invalid - fundamentally different category (LLM API vs managed RAG platform)
Best Comparison Category: Direct LLM APIs (Anthropic Claude API, Google Gemini API, AWS Bedrock) or developer frameworks (LangChain) NOT managed RAG services
Use Case Fit: Teams building custom AI applications requiring maximum LLM flexibility vs organizations wanting turnkey RAG chatbot without coding
Core Architecture: Serverless RAG infrastructure with automatic embedding generation, vector search optimization, and LLM orchestration fully managed behind API endpoints
API-First Design: Comprehensive REST API with well-documented endpoints for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data (1,400+ formats), and querying chat
API Documentation
Developer Experience: Open-source Python SDK (customgpt-client), Postman collections, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, and extensive cookbooks for rapid integration
No-Code Alternative: Wizard-style web dashboard enables non-developers to upload content, brand widgets, and deploy chatbots without touching code
Hybrid Target Market: Serves both developer teams wanting robust APIs AND business users seeking no-code RAG deployment - unique positioning vs pure API platforms (Cohere) or pure no-code tools (Jotform)
RAG Technology Leadership: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, proprietary anti-hallucination mechanisms, and citation-backed responses
Benchmark Details
Deployment Flexibility: Cloud-hosted SaaS with auto-scaling, API integrations, embedded chat widgets, ChatGPT Plugin support, and hosted MCP Server for Claude/Cursor/ChatGPT
Enterprise Readiness: SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling, domain allowlisting, RBAC with 2FA/SSO, and flat-rate pricing without per-query charges
Use Case Fit: Ideal for organizations needing both rapid no-code deployment AND robust API capabilities, teams handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), and businesses requiring production-ready RAG without building ML infrastructure from scratch
Competitive Positioning: Bridges the gap between developer-first platforms (Cohere, Deepset) requiring heavy coding and no-code chatbot builders (Jotform, Kommunicate) lacking API depth - offers best of both worlds
Competitive Positioning
Primary Advantage: Exceptional no-code usability (4.9/5 G2) with 5,000+ integrations via Pipedream and Autopilot (Computer Use) unique capabilities
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Default: Best-in-class language understanding driving 10x customer growth - 'almost no one overrides' per Anthropic
Multi-Agent Sophistication: Societies of Lindies enable complex task delegation impossible with single-bot platforms
Strong Compliance: SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA with BAA, GDPR, PIPEDA, CCPA enables regulated industry adoption
Financial Validation: $5.1M revenue (Oct 2024), $50M+ funding from Menlo Ventures, Battery Ventures, Coatue validates market fit
Setup Speed: 30 seconds vs 15-60 minutes with Zapier/Make - dramatic productivity advantage for business users
Primary Challenge: NOT a developer-focused RAG platform - no API, no SDKs, opaque RAG implementation blocks technical evaluation
Pricing Unpredictability: Credit-based model most common user complaint - costs difficult to forecast vs fixed tiers
Data Residency Limitation: US-only hosting blocks EU customers with strict data localization requirements
Market Position: Competes with Zapier, Make, n8n for workflow automation budget vs RAG API platforms (CustomGPT.ai, Pinecone Assistant)
Use Case Fit: Exceptional for business users automating workflows without developers; poor fit for developers requiring programmatic RAG capabilities
Comparison Warning: Direct feature comparison with RAG-as-a-Service platforms is misleading - different product categories, target audiences, and value propositions
Market position: Leading AI model provider offering state-of-the-art GPT models (GPT-4, GPT-3.5) as building blocks for custom AI applications, requiring developer implementation for RAG functionality
Target customers: Development teams building bespoke AI solutions, enterprises needing maximum flexibility for diverse AI use cases beyond RAG (code generation, creative writing, analysis), and organizations comfortable with DIY RAG implementation using LangChain/LlamaIndex frameworks
Key competitors: Anthropic Claude API, Google Gemini API, Azure AI, AWS Bedrock, and complete RAG platforms like CustomGPT/Vectara that bundle retrieval infrastructure
Competitive advantages: Industry-leading GPT-4 model performance, frequent model upgrades with larger context windows (128k), excellent developer documentation with official Python/Node.js SDKs, massive community ecosystem with extensive tutorials and third-party integrations, ChatGPT Enterprise for compliance-friendly deployment with SOC 2/SSO, and API data not used for training (30-day retention for abuse checks only)
Pricing advantage: Pay-as-you-go token pricing highly cost-effective at small scale ($0.0015/1K tokens GPT-3.5, $0.03-0.06/1K GPT-4); no platform fees or subscriptions beyond API usage; best value for low-volume use cases or teams with existing infrastructure (vector DB, embeddings) who only need LLM layer; can become expensive at scale without optimization
Use case fit: Ideal for developers building custom AI solutions requiring maximum flexibility, teams working on diverse AI tasks beyond RAG (code generation, creative writing, analysis), and organizations with existing ML infrastructure who want best-in-class LLM without bundled RAG platform; less suitable for teams wanting turnkey RAG chatbot without development resources
Market position: Leading all-in-one RAG platform balancing enterprise-grade accuracy with developer-friendly APIs and no-code usability for rapid deployment
Target customers: Mid-market to enterprise organizations needing production-ready AI assistants, development teams wanting robust APIs without building RAG infrastructure, and businesses requiring 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription (YouTube, podcasts)
Key competitors: OpenAI Assistants API, Botsonic, Chatbase.co, Azure AI, and custom RAG implementations using LangChain
Competitive advantages: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling included, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, hosted MCP Server support (Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT), generous data limits (60M words Standard, 300M Premium), and flat monthly pricing without per-query charges
Pricing advantage: Transparent flat-rate pricing at $99/month (Standard) and $449/month (Premium) with generous included limits; no hidden costs for API access, branding removal, or basic features; best value for teams needing both no-code dashboard and developer APIs in one platform
Use case fit: Ideal for businesses needing both rapid no-code deployment and robust API capabilities, organizations handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), teams requiring white-label chatbots with source citations for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects, and companies wanting all-in-one RAG without managing ML infrastructure
A I Models
Default Model - Claude Sonnet 4.5: Primary LLM 'almost no one overrides' according to Anthropic case study - excels at navigating ambiguity in large context windows
Anthropic Claude Family: Sonnet 4.5 (default, best performance), Sonnet 3.7 (balanced), Haiku 3.5 (fast, cost-effective) with 200K token context windows
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Rationale: Selected for 'navigating ambiguity in large context windows' and handling 'deeply nested data structures requiring nuanced reasoning'
Business Impact: Lindy achieved 10x customer growth after implementing Claude as default LLM - significant competitive advantage
Model Switching: Each workflow action requires explicit model selection - no automatic routing based on query complexity or cost optimization
No Dynamic Model Routing: Cannot intelligently switch between models based on task requirements - manual configuration only vs AI-powered model selection
Limited Model Experimentation: No A/B testing capabilities or automatic model performance comparison across different LLMs
GPT-4 Family: GPT-4 (8k/32k context), GPT-4 Turbo (128k context), GPT-4o (optimized) - industry-leading language understanding and generation
GPT-3.5 Family: GPT-3.5 Turbo (4k/16k context) - cost-effective for high-volume applications with good performance
Frequent Model Upgrades: Regular releases with improved capabilities, larger context windows, and better performance benchmarks
OpenAI-Only Ecosystem: Cannot swap to Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, or other providers - locked to OpenAI models
No Auto-Routing: Developers explicitly choose which model to call per request - no automatic GPT-3.5/GPT-4 selection based on complexity
Fine-Tuning Available: GPT-3.5 fine-tuning for domain-specific customization with training data
Cutting-Edge Performance: GPT-4 consistently ranks top-tier for language tasks, reasoning, and complex problem-solving in benchmarks
Primary models: GPT-5.1 and 4 series from OpenAI, and Anthropic's Claude 4.5 (opus and sonnet) for enterprise needs
Automatic model selection: Balances cost and performance by automatically selecting the appropriate model for each request
Model Selection Details
Proprietary optimizations: Custom prompt engineering and retrieval enhancements for high-quality, citation-backed answers
Managed infrastructure: All model management handled behind the scenes - no API keys or fine-tuning required from users
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms ensure chatbot only answers based on provided content, improving trust and factual accuracy
Search Fuzziness: 100 = pure semantic search (no file limit), lower values add keyword matching but limit to first 1,500 files - trade-off between precision and scale
Default Retrieval: 4 search results returned per query (adjustable up to 10 maximum) for context-aware responses
Document Processing: PDF, DOCX, XLSX, CSV, TXT, HTML with 20MB per-file size limit and automatic text extraction
Audio & Video: Full audio file support with automatic transcription, YouTube transcript extraction via dedicated action
Website Crawling: Single page or full-site crawling with automatic link following and sitemap discovery
Cloud Integration: Google Drive (shared drives), OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint, Intercom, Freshdesk with automatic 24-hour sync
Manual Refresh: 'Resync Knowledge Base' actions for immediate updates when 24-hour sync insufficient
Vector Database: NOT disclosed - no documentation mentions Pinecone, Chroma, Qdrant, or proprietary implementation
Embedding Models: Undocumented - no information about which embedding models power semantic search or customization options
Chunking Strategy: Not configurable - automatic text segmentation with undisclosed chunk size and overlap parameters
Hallucination Reduction: 'Agents on rails' philosophy constrains LLM behavior through predefined workflow steps - architectural constraints vs retrieval optimization
Learning Integration: Human feedback corrections embedded in vector storage for future retrieval improvement
CRITICAL LIMITATION - Black Box Implementation: RAG treated as opaque system - no transparency into vector similarity scores, embedding quality, retrieval mechanisms
CRITICAL LIMITATION - No Published Benchmarks: No RAG accuracy metrics, retrieval precision/recall scores, or latency measurements available
CRITICAL LIMITATION - No Developer Control: Cannot customize embedding models, similarity thresholds, reranking, or retrieval parameters
Enterprise Concern: Opacity may concern organizations requiring transparency into AI decision-making for compliance auditing or regulatory requirements
NO Built-In RAG: OpenAI provides LLM models only - developers must build entire RAG pipeline (embeddings, vector DB, retrieval, prompting)
Embeddings API: text-embedding-ada-002 and newer models for generating vector embeddings from text for semantic search
DIY Architecture: Typical RAG implementation: embed documents → store in external vector DB (Pinecone, Weaviate) → retrieve at query time → inject into GPT prompt
Azure Assistants Preview: Azure OpenAI Service offers beta File Search tool with uploads for semantic search (minimal, preview-stage)
Function Calling: Enables GPT to trigger external functions (like retrieval endpoints) but requires developer implementation
Framework Integration: Works with LangChain, LlamaIndex for RAG scaffolding - but these are third-party tools, not OpenAI products
NO Turnkey RAG Service: Unlike RAG platforms with managed infrastructure, OpenAI leaves retrieval architecture entirely to developers
Core architecture: GPT-4 combined with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology, outperforming OpenAI in RAG benchmarks
RAG Performance
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms reduce hallucinations and ensure responses are grounded in provided content
Benchmark Details
Automatic citations: Each response includes clickable citations pointing to original source documents for transparency and verification
Optimized pipeline: Efficient vector search, smart chunking, and caching for sub-second reply times
Scalability: Maintains speed and accuracy for massive knowledge bases with tens of millions of words
Context-aware conversations: Multi-turn conversations with persistent history and comprehensive conversation management
Source verification: Always cites sources so users can verify facts on the spot
Use Cases
Primary Use Case: No-code workflow automation for operations teams, sales teams, marketing teams requiring AI-powered task execution without developers
Sales Automation: Lead qualification with real-time scoring, email/phone validation, firmographic enrichment, CRM syncing (Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive)
Customer Support: Email triage, ticket routing, FAQ responses, escalation workflows with human handoff and context transfer
Healthcare: Patient appointment scheduling, medical record processing (HIPAA-compliant), insurance verification, billing automation
Legal: Document review, contract analysis, case research, deadline tracking with confidentiality controls
Voice Agents (Gaia): Phone call automation with 30+ language support, call transcription in 50+ languages, call transfer to humans
Team Sizes: Individual contributors to enterprise teams (1-500+ users) - scales from solopreneurs to Fortune 500 companies
Industries: Technology, professional services, healthcare, legal, financial services, e-commerce, real estate - any industry with repetitive workflows
Implementation Speed: 30 seconds with Agent Builder ('vibe coding') vs 15-60 minutes with Zapier/Make - fastest setup in automation category
NOT Ideal For: Developers needing programmatic RAG APIs, custom retrieval pipeline tuning, embedding model experimentation, transparent RAG implementation details, organizations requiring EU data residency
Custom AI Applications: Building bespoke solutions requiring maximum flexibility beyond pre-packaged chatbot platforms
Code Generation: GitHub Copilot-style tools, IDE integrations, automated code review, and development acceleration
Creative Writing: Content generation, marketing copy, storytelling, and creative ideation at scale
Data Analysis: Natural language queries over structured data, report generation, and insight extraction
Customer Service: Custom chatbots for support workflows integrated with business systems and knowledge bases
Education: Tutoring systems, adaptive learning platforms, and educational content generation
Research & Summarization: Document analysis, literature review, and multi-document summarization
Enterprise Automation: Workflow automation, document processing, and business intelligence with ChatGPT Enterprise
NOT IDEAL FOR: Non-technical teams wanting turnkey RAG chatbot without coding - better served by complete RAG platforms
Customer support automation: AI assistants handling common queries, reducing support ticket volume, providing 24/7 instant responses with source citations
Internal knowledge management: Employee self-service for HR policies, technical documentation, onboarding materials, company procedures across 1,400+ file formats
Sales enablement: Product information chatbots, lead qualification, customer education with white-labeled widgets on websites and apps
Documentation assistance: Technical docs, help centers, FAQs with automatic website crawling and sitemap indexing
Educational platforms: Course materials, research assistance, student support with multimedia content (YouTube transcriptions, podcasts)
Healthcare information: Patient education, medical knowledge bases (SOC 2 Type II compliant for sensitive data)
E-commerce: Product recommendations, order assistance, customer inquiries with API integration to 5,000+ apps via Zapier
SaaS onboarding: User guides, feature explanations, troubleshooting with multi-agent support for different teams
Security & Compliance
SOC 2 Type II Certified: Independently audited by Johanson Group validating security controls for data protection, availability, processing integrity
HIPAA Compliant: Business Associate Agreement (BAA) available for healthcare organizations handling Protected Health Information (PHI)
GDPR Compliant: EU General Data Protection Regulation compliance with data processing agreements, right to deletion, consent management
PIPEDA Compliant: Canadian Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act for Canadian customer data
CCPA Compliant: California Consumer Privacy Act compliance for California residents with data access/deletion rights
No AI Training on Customer Data: Explicitly stated in privacy policy - customer data NEVER used for AI model training or improvement
Encryption Standards: AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.2+ in transit for comprehensive data protection across all storage and transmission
Infrastructure: Google Cloud Platform hosting with multi-zone redundancy for 99.9%+ uptime and disaster recovery
Daily Backups: Encrypted backups with secure key management and point-in-time recovery capabilities
Access Controls: RBAC (Role-Based Access Control), MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication), audit logs tracking agent activity and data access
Enterprise SSO: Single Sign-On via existing identity providers (Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace) for centralized authentication
SCIM Provisioning: Automated user lifecycle management with automatic provisioning/deprovisioning for enterprise security
Admin Controls: Lock configurations, set credit allocation limits per user/team, monitor usage for cost control and security
Audit Logs: Track agent activity, data access, configuration changes on Business/Enterprise plans for compliance and security monitoring
Log Retention: 1 day (Free - severely limits troubleshooting), 7-30 days (Pro/Business), 30+ days (Enterprise with custom retention)
LIMITATION - No ISO 27001: Information Security Management System certification not documented - may limit enterprise procurement
LIMITATION - US Data Residency Only: No explicit EU data residency option documented - enterprise inquiries required for region-specific deployments
LIMITATION - Free Tier Log Retention: 1 day severely constrains security incident investigation and compliance auditing vs 30+ day industry standard
API Data Privacy: API data not used for training - deleted after 30 days (abuse check retention only)
ChatGPT Enterprise: SOC 2 Type II compliant with SSO, stronger privacy guarantees, and enterprise-grade security
Encryption: Data encrypted in transit (TLS) and at rest with enterprise-grade standards
GDPR Support: Data Processing Addendum (DPA) available for API and enterprise customers for GDPR compliance
HIPAA Compliance: Business Associate Agreement (BAA) available for API healthcare customers supporting HIPAA requirements
Regional Data Residency: Eligible customers (Enterprise, Edu, API) can select regional data residency (e.g., Europe)
Zero-Retention Option: Enterprise/API customers can opt for no data retention at all for maximum privacy
Developer Responsibility: Application-level security (user auth, input validation, logging) entirely on developers - not provided by OpenAI
Third-Party Audits: SOC 2 Type 2 evaluated by independent auditors for API and enterprise products
Encryption: SSL/TLS for data in transit, 256-bit AES encryption for data at rest
SOC 2 Type II certification: Industry-leading security standards with regular third-party audits
Security Certifications
GDPR compliance: Full compliance with European data protection regulations, ensuring data privacy and user rights
Access controls: Role-based access control (RBAC), two-factor authentication (2FA), SSO integration for enterprise security
Data isolation: Customer data stays isolated and private - platform never trains on user data
Domain allowlisting: Ensures chatbot appears only on approved sites for security and brand protection
Secure deployments: ChatGPT Plugin support for private use cases with controlled access
Pricing & Plans
Free Plan - $0/month: 400 credits, 1M character knowledge base, 100+ integrations, basic automations, 1-day log retention for evaluation
Pro Plan - $49.99/month: 5,000 credits, 20M character knowledge base, phone calls, full integrations, Lindy branding on embed, 7-day logs
Business Plan - $199.99-$299.99/month: 20,000-30,000 credits, 50M character knowledge base, custom branding, 30+ languages, unlimited calls, 30-day logs
Enterprise Plan - Custom Pricing: Unlimited credits/users, custom knowledge base limits, SSO, SCIM provisioning, dedicated support, custom SLAs, custom training
Additional Team Members: $19.99/member/month on Pro/Business plans for expanding user access and collaboration
Phone Calls: $0.19/minute using GPT-4o for voice interactions - additional cost on top of plan credits
Custom Automation Building: $500 one-time fee for professional automation development by Lindy team
Credit Add-Ons: $19-$1,199/month for 10,000-1,000,000 credits for high-volume usage beyond plan limits
Credit Consumption Variability: Varies by model choice (Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Haiku 3.5), workflow complexity, premium actions - unpredictable costs
Billing Cycle: Monthly subscription with automatic renewal, credit rollover not documented (likely use-it-or-lose-it monthly)
Payment Methods: Credit card, Enterprise invoicing with wire transfer options for annual contracts
Comparison: vs Zapier ($19.99-$69/month), Make ($9-$29/month), n8n (self-hosted free) - Lindy premium pricing justified by AI capabilities
PRIMARY USER COMPLAINT - Unpredictable Costs: Credit depletion speed consistently frustrating in reviews - 'credits consumed quickly and unpredictably'
CRITICAL LIMITATION - Pricing Transparency: Credit system creates forecasting difficulty vs fixed per-seat or usage-based pricing - budget planning challenging
LIMITATION - Character Limits: 50M character cap on Business tier may limit large enterprise deployments vs unlimited competitors
Pay-As-You-Go Tokens: $0.0015/1K tokens GPT-3.5 Turbo (input), ~$0.03-0.06/1K tokens GPT-4 depending on model variant
No Platform Fees: Pure consumption pricing - no subscriptions, monthly minimums, or seat-based fees beyond API usage
Embeddings Pricing: Separate cost for text-embedding models used in RAG workflows (~$0.0001/1K tokens)
Rate Limits by Tier: Usage tiers automatically increase limits as spending grows (Tier 1: 3,500 RPM / 200K TPM for GPT-3.5)
ChatGPT Enterprise: Custom pricing with higher rate limits, dedicated capacity, and compliance features after sales engagement
Cost at Scale: Bills can spike without optimization - high-volume applications need token management strategies
External Costs: RAG implementations incur additional costs for vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate) and hosting infrastructure
Best Value For: Low-volume use cases or teams with existing infrastructure who only need LLM layer - becomes expensive at scale
No Free Tier: Trial credits may be available for new accounts, but ongoing usage requires payment
Standard Plan: $99/month or $89/month annual - 10 custom chatbots, 5,000 items per chatbot, 60 million words per bot, basic helpdesk support, standard security
View Pricing
Premium Plan: $499/month or $449/month annual - 100 custom chatbots, 20,000 items per chatbot, 300 million words per bot, advanced support, enhanced security, additional customization
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing - Comprehensive AI solutions, highest security and compliance, dedicated account managers, custom SSO, token authentication, priority support with faster SLAs
Enterprise Solutions
7-Day Free Trial: Full access to Standard features without charges - available to all users
Annual billing discount: Save 10% by paying upfront annually ($89/mo Standard, $449/mo Premium)
Flat monthly rates: No per-query charges, no hidden costs for API access or white-labeling (included in all plans)
Managed infrastructure: Auto-scaling cloud infrastructure included - no additional hosting or scaling fees
Support & Documentation
Email Support: support@lindy.ai (general), security@lindy.ai (security issues), privacy@lindy.ai (privacy concerns) with tier-based response times
Slack Community: Peer support network for knowledge sharing among Lindy users and automation best practices
Community Forum: community.lindy.ai for discussions, troubleshooting, feature requests with active user participation
Documentation: Lindy Academy with step-by-step tutorials for business users, video walkthroughs, use case examples
Onboarding: Self-service for Free/Pro, guided onboarding for Business, white-glove implementation for Enterprise with custom training
User-Focused Resources: Strong for business user adoption with non-technical language, visual guides, practical examples
CRITICAL GAP - No Developer Documentation: No API reference, code samples, technical architecture documentation, OpenAPI specs
CRITICAL GAP - No Phone Support: Email and community only for Free/Pro/Business tiers - phone access restricted to Enterprise only
LIMITATION - Support Quality Inconsistency: User reviews note 'inconsistent responsiveness on lower tiers' - common Trustpilot criticism
LIMITATION - Slow Response Times: Some users report 'writing to support twice with no response' - support quality concerns for non-enterprise customers
Excellent Documentation: Comprehensive at platform.openai.com with API reference, guides, code samples, and best practices
Official SDKs: Python, Node.js, and other language libraries with well-maintained code examples and tutorials
Active community: User community plus 5,000+ app integrations through Zapier ecosystem
Regular updates: Platform stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements automatically
Limitations & Considerations
NO Public REST API: Cannot manage agents, create workflows, or query knowledge base programmatically - blocks developer integration
NO Official SDKs: No Python, JavaScript, Ruby, Go, or any language SDK for programmatic access - workflow automation only
NO CLI Tools: No command-line interface for automation or scripting - dashboard-only management
NO Developer Console: No API sandbox, testing environment, or technical documentation for developers
Black Box RAG Implementation: Vector database, embedding models, similarity thresholds completely undisclosed - no transparency
No RAG Benchmarks: No published accuracy metrics, retrieval precision/recall, or latency measurements for evaluation
Search Fuzziness Constraint: Lower fuzziness values limit searches to first 1,500 files - meaningful limitation for large deployments
Character Storage Limits: 50M character maximum on Business tier - may constrain large enterprise knowledge bases vs unlimited competitors
Unpredictable Credit Consumption: Most common user complaint - 'credits depleted quickly and unpredictably' makes budgeting difficult
US-Only Data Residency: No documented EU data residency option - blocks customers with strict data localization requirements (GDPR, Digital Sovereignty)
No ISO 27001 Certification: Only SOC 2 Type II documented - ISO 27001 absence may limit enterprise procurement in regulated industries
1-Day Free Tier Log Retention: Severely limits troubleshooting and security incident investigation vs 30+ day industry standard
Learning Curve for Complex Workflows: Despite 'vibe coding' simplicity, sophisticated multi-agent systems and delegation rules require workflow design expertise
Support Quality Inconsistency: Mixed reviews noting slow/unresponsive support for non-enterprise tiers - support quality varies significantly by plan
No Manual Model Performance Comparison: Cannot A/B test different LLMs or compare model performance - manual experimentation required
Credit-Based Pricing Opacity: Difficult to forecast costs vs fixed per-seat or per-query pricing - budget planning challenging
NOT Ideal For: Developers needing RAG APIs, teams requiring transparent RAG implementation, EU data residency requirements, organizations needing predictable pricing, technical teams wanting embedding/retrieval control
Platform Category Mismatch: Fundamentally a workflow automation platform (competes with Zapier/Make) NOT a RAG-as-a-Service platform - architectural comparison to CustomGPT.ai is misleading
NO Built-In RAG: Entire retrieval infrastructure must be built by developers - not turnkey knowledge base solution
NO Managed Vector DB: Must integrate external vector databases (Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant) for embeddings storage
Developer-Only: Requires coding expertise - no no-code interface for non-technical teams
Rate Limits: Usage tiers start restrictive (Tier 1: 500 RPM for GPT-4) - high-volume apps need tier upgrades
Model Lock-In: Cannot use Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, or other providers - tied to OpenAI ecosystem
Hallucination Without RAG: GPT-4 can hallucinate on private/recent data without proper retrieval implementation
NO Chat UI: ChatGPT web interface separate from API - not embeddable or customizable for business use
DIY Monitoring: Application-level logging, analytics, and observability entirely on developers to implement
RAG Maintenance: Ongoing effort for keeping embeddings updated, managing vector DB, and optimizing retrieval pipelines
Cost at Scale: Token pricing can spike without careful optimization - high-volume applications need cost management
Best For Developers: Maximum flexibility for technical teams, but inappropriate for non-coders wanting self-serve chatbot
Managed service approach: Less control over underlying RAG pipeline configuration compared to build-your-own solutions like LangChain
Vendor lock-in: Proprietary platform - migration to alternative RAG solutions requires rebuilding knowledge bases
Model selection: Limited to OpenAI (GPT-5.1 and 4 series) and Anthropic (Claude, opus and sonnet 4.5) - no support for other LLM providers (Cohere, AI21, open-source models)
Pricing at scale: Flat-rate pricing may become expensive for very high-volume use cases (millions of queries/month) compared to pay-per-use models
Customization limits: While highly configurable, some advanced RAG techniques (custom reranking, hybrid search strategies) may not be exposed
Language support: Supports 90+ languages but performance may vary for less common languages or specialized domains
Real-time data: Knowledge bases require re-indexing for updates - not ideal for real-time data requirements (stock prices, live inventory)
Enterprise features: Some advanced features (custom SSO, token authentication) only available on Enterprise plan with custom pricing
After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both Lindy.ai and OpenAI are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.
When to Choose Lindy.ai
You value exceptional no-code usability: 4.9/5 g2 rating, 30-second setup vs 15-60 min with zapier/make
Massive integration ecosystem: 5,000+ apps via Pipedream Connect with 2,500+ pre-built actions
Claude Sonnet 4.5 default drives 10x customer growth - best-in-class language understanding
Best For: Exceptional no-code usability: 4.9/5 G2 rating, 30-second setup vs 15-60 min with Zapier/Make
When to Choose OpenAI
You value industry-leading model performance
Comprehensive API features
Regular model updates
Best For: Industry-leading model performance
Migration & Switching Considerations
Switching between Lindy.ai and OpenAI requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.
Pricing Comparison Summary
Lindy.ai starts at custom pricing, while OpenAI begins at custom pricing. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.
Our Recommendation Process
Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality
For most organizations, the decision between Lindy.ai and OpenAI comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.
📚 Next Steps
Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.
• Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
• Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
• Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
• Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements
Last updated: December 11, 2025 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.
The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.
DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.
People Also Compare
Explore more AI tool comparisons to find the perfect solution for your needs
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...