Lindy.ai vs OpenAI

Make an informed decision with our comprehensive comparison. Discover which RAG solution perfectly fits your needs.

Priyansh Khodiyar's avatar
Priyansh KhodiyarDevRel at CustomGPT.ai

Fact checked and reviewed by Bill Cava

Published: 01.04.2025Updated: 25.04.2025

In this comprehensive guide, we compare Lindy.ai and OpenAI across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.

Overview

When choosing between Lindy.ai and OpenAI, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.

Quick Decision Guide

  • Choose Lindy.ai if: you value exceptional no-code usability: 4.9/5 g2 rating, 30-second setup vs 15-60 min with zapier/make
  • Choose OpenAI if: you value industry-leading model performance

About Lindy.ai

Lindy.ai Landing Page Screenshot

Lindy.ai is ai-powered personal assistant for workflow automation. No-code AI agent platform positioning as 'AI employees' for workflow automation, NOT developer-focused RAG platform. 5,000+ integrations via Pipedream, Claude Sonnet 4.5 default, $5.1M revenue (Oct 2024), 4.9/5 G2 rating. Critical limitation: No public API or SDKs available. Founded in 2023, headquartered in San Francisco, CA, USA, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.

Overall Rating
81/100
Starting Price
Custom

About OpenAI

OpenAI Landing Page Screenshot

OpenAI is leading ai research company and api provider. OpenAI provides state-of-the-art language models and AI capabilities through APIs, including GPT-4, assistants with retrieval capabilities, and various AI tools for developers and enterprises. Founded in 2015, headquartered in San Francisco, CA, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.

Overall Rating
90/100
Starting Price
Custom

Key Differences at a Glance

In terms of user ratings, OpenAI in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, pricing is comparable. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: AI Assistant versus AI Platform. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.

⚠️ What This Comparison Covers

We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.

Detailed Feature Comparison

logo of lindy
Lindy.ai
logo of openai
OpenAI
logo of customGPT logo
CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
  • Document Formats – PDF, DOCX, XLSX, CSV, TXT, HTML (20MB per file)
  • Cloud Integrations – Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint, auto 24-hour sync
  • ⚠️ Storage Limits – 1M chars (Free), 20M (Pro), 50M (Business)
  • ⚠️ Search Constraint – Fuzziness <100 limits to first 1,500 files
  • ✅ Embeddings API – text-embedding models generate vectors for semantic search workflows
  • ⚠️ DIY Pipeline – No ready-made ingestion; build chunking, indexing, refreshing yourself
  • Azure File Search – Beta preview tool accepts uploads for semantic search
  • Manual Architecture – Embed docs → vector DB → retrieve chunks at query time
  • 1,400+ file formats – PDF, DOCX, Excel, PowerPoint, Markdown, HTML + auto-extraction from ZIP/RAR/7Z archives
  • Website crawling – Sitemap indexing with configurable depth for help docs, FAQs, and public content
  • Multimedia transcription – AI Vision, OCR, YouTube/Vimeo/podcast speech-to-text built-in
  • Cloud integrations – Google Drive, SharePoint, OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion with auto-sync
  • Knowledge platforms – Zendesk, Freshdesk, HubSpot, Confluence, Shopify connectors
  • Massive scale – 60M words (Standard) / 300M words (Premium) per bot with no performance degradation
Integrations & Channels
  • 5,000+ Apps – Via Pipedream Connect with 2,500+ ready actions
  • Messaging – Slack, WhatsApp, Teams, Telegram, Discord, Twilio SMS
  • CRM – Salesforce (24 actions), HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho CRM
  • Productivity – Notion, Airtable, Google Workspace (Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Sheets, Drive)
  • Webhooks + HTTP – Inbound triggers and outbound API calls
  • ⚠️ No First-Party Channels – Build Slack bots, widgets, integrations yourself or use third-party
  • ✅ API Flexibility – Run GPT anywhere; channel-agnostic engine for custom implementations
  • Community Tools – Zapier, community Slack bots exist but aren't official OpenAI
  • Manual Wiring – Everything is code-based; no out-of-the-box UI or connectors
  • Website embedding – Lightweight JS widget or iframe with customizable positioning
  • CMS plugins – WordPress, WIX, Webflow, Framer, SquareSpace native support
  • 5,000+ app ecosystem – Zapier connects CRMs, marketing, e-commerce tools
  • MCP Server – Integrate with Claude Desktop, Cursor, ChatGPT, Windsurf
  • OpenAI SDK compatible – Drop-in replacement for OpenAI API endpoints
  • LiveChat + Slack – Native chat widgets with human handoff capabilities
Core Agent Features
  • Agent Autonomy Focus – Task execution vs conversational chatbot
  • Multi-Lingual – 30+ (voice), 50+ (transcription), 85+ (text)
  • ✅ Lead Capture – Real-time qualification, CRM sync (70% higher conversion claimed)
  • Agent Evals – Benchmarking with regression prevention
  • ✅ Assistants API (v2) – Built-in conversation history, persistent threads, tool access management
  • ✅ Function Calling – Models invoke external functions/tools; describe structure, receive calls with arguments
  • ✅ Parallel Tool Execution – Access Code Interpreter, File Search, custom functions simultaneously
  • Responses API (2024) – New primitive with web search, file search, computer use
  • ✅ Structured Outputs – strict: true guarantees arguments match JSON Schema for reliable parsing
  • ⚠️ Agent Limitations – Less control vs LangChain for complex workflows; simpler assistant paradigm
  • Custom AI Agents – Autonomous GPT-4/Claude agents for business tasks
  • Multi-Agent Systems – Specialized agents for support, sales, knowledge
  • Memory & Context – Persistent conversation history across sessions
  • Tool Integration – Webhooks + 5,000 Zapier apps for automation
  • Continuous Learning – Auto re-indexing without manual retraining
Customization & Branding
  • Widget – Custom name, accent color, logo for expanded/collapsed states
  • Domain Restrictions – Control allowed deployment domains
  • Memory Snippets – Learning preferences saved across sessions
  • ⚠️ White-Label Unclear – Complete branding removal not explicitly confirmed
  • ⚠️ No Turnkey UI – Build branded front-end yourself; no theming layer provided
  • System Messages – Set tone/style via prompts; white-label chat requires development
  • ChatGPT Custom Instructions – Apply only inside ChatGPT app, not embedded widgets
  • Developer Project – All branding, UI customization is your responsibility
  • Full white-labeling included – Colors, logos, CSS, custom domains at no extra cost
  • 2-minute setup – No-code wizard with drag-and-drop interface
  • Persona customization – Control AI personality, tone, response style via pre-prompts
  • Visual theme editor – Real-time preview of branding changes
  • Domain allowlisting – Restrict embedding to approved sites only
L L M Model Options
  • Anthropic Claude – Sonnet 4.5 (default), Sonnet 3.7, Haiku 3.5
  • OpenAI – GPT-5, GPT-5 Codex, GPT-4o, GPT-4 Turbo, o3, o1
  • Google Gemini – 2.5 Pro, 2.5 Flash, 2.0 Flash
  • Per-Action Selection – Manual model choice affects credit consumption
  • ⚠️ No Auto-Routing – No dynamic model switching
  • ✅ GPT-4 Family – GPT-4 (8k/32k), GPT-4 Turbo (128k), GPT-4o top-tier performance
  • ✅ GPT-3.5 Family – GPT-3.5 Turbo (4k/16k) cost-effective for high-volume use
  • ⚠️ OpenAI-Only – Cannot swap to Claude, Gemini; locked to OpenAI ecosystem
  • Manual Routing – Developer chooses model per request; no automatic selection
  • ✅ Frequent Upgrades – Regular releases with larger context windows and better benchmarks
  • GPT-5.1 models – Latest thinking models (Optimal & Smart variants)
  • GPT-4 series – GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-4o available
  • Claude 4.5 – Anthropic's Opus available for Enterprise
  • Auto model routing – Balances cost/performance automatically
  • Zero API key management – All models managed behind the scenes
Developer Experience ( A P I & S D Ks)
  • ⚠️ CRITICAL LIMITATION – NO public REST API, GraphQL, or SDKs
  • Workarounds Only – Inbound webhooks, HTTP actions, Code sandboxes (~150ms)
  • User-Focused Docs – Lindy Academy for business users, NO API reference
  • ✅ Excellent Docs – Official Python/Node.js SDKs; comprehensive API reference and guides
  • Function Calling – Simplifies prompting; you build RAG pipeline (indexing, retrieval, assembly)
  • Framework Support – Works with LangChain/LlamaIndex (third-party tools, not OpenAI products)
  • ⚠️ No Reference Architecture – Vast community examples but no official RAG blueprint
  • REST API – Full-featured for agents, projects, data ingestion, chat queries
  • Python SDK – Open-source customgpt-client with full API coverage
  • Postman collections – Pre-built requests for rapid prototyping
  • Webhooks – Real-time event notifications for conversations and leads
  • OpenAI compatible – Use existing OpenAI SDK code with minimal changes
Performance & Accuracy
  • Hybrid Search – Semantic + keyword with Fuzziness slider (0-100)
  • Hallucination Reduction – Human confirmation before actions
  • ⚠️ NO Published Benchmarks – No RAG accuracy or latency metrics
  • ⚠️ Black Box – Vector database and embedding models undisclosed
  • ✅ GPT-4 Top-Tier – Leading performance for language tasks; requires RAG for domain accuracy
  • ⚠️ Hallucination Risk – Can hallucinate on private/recent data without retrieval implementation
  • Well-Built RAG Delivers – High accuracy achievable with proper indexing, chunking, prompt design
  • Latency Considerations – Larger models (128k context) add latency; scales well under load
  • Sub-second responses – Optimized RAG with vector search and multi-layer caching
  • Benchmark-proven – 13% higher accuracy, 34% faster than OpenAI Assistants API
  • Anti-hallucination tech – Responses grounded only in your provided content
  • OpenGraph citations – Rich visual cards with titles, descriptions, images
  • 99.9% uptime – Auto-scaling infrastructure handles traffic spikes
Pricing & Scalability
  • Free: $0 – 400 credits, 1M char knowledge base
  • Pro: $49.99 – 5,000 credits, 20M chars, phone calls, Lindy branding
  • Business: $199.99-$299.99 – 20K-30K credits, 50M chars, custom branding
  • Enterprise: Custom – SSO, SCIM, dedicated support, custom training
  • ⚠️ Unpredictable Costs – Credit depletion speed is primary user complaint
  • ✅ Pay-As-You-Go – $0.0015/1K tokens GPT-3.5; ~$0.03-0.06/1K GPT-4 token pricing
  • ⚠️ Scale Costs – Great low usage; bills spike at scale with rate limits
  • No Flat Rate – Consumption-based only; cover external hosting (vector DB) separately
  • Enterprise Contracts – Higher concurrency, compliance features, dedicated capacity via sales
  • Standard: $99/mo – 60M words, 10 bots
  • Premium: $449/mo – 300M words, 100 bots
  • Auto-scaling – Managed cloud scales with demand
  • Flat rates – No per-query charges
Security & Privacy
  • SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, PIPEDA, CCPA – Comprehensive compliance
  • Encryption – AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.2+ in transit
  • Enterprise SSO + SCIM – Automated user lifecycle management
  • ⚠️ US Data Residency Only – No explicit EU option documented
  • ✅ API Data Privacy – Not used for training; 30-day retention for abuse checks
  • ✅ Encryption Standard – TLS in transit, at rest encryption; ChatGPT Enterprise adds SOC 2/SSO
  • ⚠️ Developer Responsibility – You secure user inputs, logs, auth, HIPAA/GDPR compliance
  • No User Portal – Build auth/access control in your own front-end
  • SOC 2 Type II + GDPR – Third-party audited compliance
  • Encryption – 256-bit AES at rest, SSL/TLS in transit
  • Access controls – RBAC, 2FA, SSO, domain allowlisting
  • Data isolation – Never trains on your data
Observability & Monitoring
  • Workflow Performance – Agent action visibility with recent runs
  • Audit Logs – User actions, data access on Business/Enterprise plans
  • ⚠️ Log Retention – 1 day (Free) severely constrains troubleshooting
  • ⚠️ NO RAG Metrics – Cannot track retrieval precision or recall
  • ⚠️ Basic Dashboard – Tracks monthly token spend, rate limits; no conversation analytics
  • DIY Logging – Log Q&A traffic yourself; no specialized RAG metrics
  • Status Page – Uptime monitoring, error codes, rate-limit headers available
  • Community Solutions – Datadog/Splunk setups shared; you build monitoring pipeline
  • Real-time dashboard – Query volumes, token usage, response times
  • Customer Intelligence – User behavior patterns, popular queries, knowledge gaps
  • Conversation analytics – Full transcripts, resolution rates, common questions
  • Export capabilities – API export to BI tools and data warehouses
Support & Ecosystem
  • Email Support – support@lindy.ai, security@lindy.ai, privacy@lindy.ai
  • Slack + Forum – community.lindy.ai for peer support
  • 100+ Templates – Pre-built workflow automation scenarios
  • ⚠️ Support Inconsistency – Mixed reviews on responsiveness for lower tiers
  • ✅ Massive Community – Thorough docs, code samples; direct support requires Enterprise
  • Third-Party Frameworks – Slack bots, LangChain, LlamaIndex building blocks abound
  • Broad AI Focus – Text, speech, images; RAG is one of many use cases
  • Enterprise Premium Support – Success managers, SLAs, compliance environment for Enterprise customers
  • Comprehensive docs – Tutorials, cookbooks, API references
  • Email + in-app support – Under 24hr response time
  • Premium support – Dedicated account managers for Premium/Enterprise
  • Open-source SDK – Python SDK, Postman, GitHub examples
  • 5,000+ Zapier apps – CRMs, e-commerce, marketing integrations
No- Code Interface & Usability
  • ✅ 4.9/5 G2 Rating – 109+ reviews validate ease of use
  • Agent Builder – Natural language prompts create complex agents
  • Setup Speed – 30 seconds vs 15-60 minutes with Zapier/Make
  • Drag-Drop Builder – Visual workflow construction, zero coding
  • ⚠️ Not No-Code – Requires coding embeddings, retrieval, chat UI; no-code OpenAI options minimal
  • ChatGPT Web App – User-friendly but not embeddable with your data/branding by default
  • Third-Party Tools – Zapier/Bubble offer partial integrations; not official OpenAI solutions
  • Developer-Focused – Extremely capable for coders; less for non-technical teams wanting self-serve
  • 2-minute deployment – Fastest time-to-value in the industry
  • Wizard interface – Step-by-step with visual previews
  • Drag-and-drop – Upload files, paste URLs, connect cloud storage
  • In-browser testing – Test before deploying to production
  • Zero learning curve – Productive on day one
Autopilot & Computer Use ( Core Differentiator)
  • Unique Capability – AI agents operate cloud-based virtual computers
  • No API Required – Interact with any website/application through computer vision
  • E2B Sandboxes – Secure Python/JavaScript execution (~150ms startup)
  • ✅ Market Differentiation – Computer Use unique among no-code automation platforms
N/A
N/A
Multi- Agent Collaboration
  • Societies of Lindies – Multiple specialized agents with delegation rules
  • Context Preservation – Full conversation history passed between agents
  • Use Cases – Sales (SDR → AE → CS), Support (Triage → Technical → Escalation)
  • Learning Shared – Feedback across agent society for collective improvement
N/A
N/A
Lead Capture & Conversion
  • Real-Time Qualification – AI evaluates lead quality during conversation
  • Enrichment – Firmographic data, UTM attribution, validation
  • Auto CRM Sync – Qualified leads flow to Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho
  • ✅ 70% Higher Conversion – Claimed vs traditional forms (vendor claim)
N/A
N/A
R A G-as-a- Service Assessment
  • ⚠️ NOT a RAG Platform – Workflow automation for business users vs developers
  • Black-Box RAG – Hybrid search with no exposed retrieval controls
  • NO API, SDKs, CLI – No programmatic access for developers
  • ⚠️ NOT RAG-AS-A-SERVICE – Provides LLM models/APIs, not managed RAG infrastructure
  • DIY RAG Architecture – Embed docs → external vector DB → retrieve → inject into prompt
  • File Search (Beta) – Azure preview includes minimal semantic search; not production RAG
  • ⚠️ No Managed Infrastructure – Unlike CustomGPT/Vectara, leaves chunking, indexing, retrieval to developers
  • Framework vs Service – Compare to LLM APIs (Claude, Gemini), not managed RAG platforms
  • External Costs – RAG needs vector DBs (Pinecone $70+/month), hosting, embeddings API
  • Platform type – TRUE RAG-AS-A-SERVICE with managed infrastructure
  • API-first – REST API, Python SDK, OpenAI compatibility, MCP Server
  • No-code option – 2-minute wizard deployment for non-developers
  • Hybrid positioning – Serves both dev teams (APIs) and business users (no-code)
  • Enterprise ready – SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, WCAG 2.0, flat-rate pricing
Competitive Positioning
  • ✅ Primary Advantage – 4.9/5 G2 usability with 5,000+ integrations
  • Financial Validation – $5.1M revenue, $50M+ funding (Menlo, Battery, Coatue)
  • Claude Sonnet 4.5 Default – Drove 10x customer growth
  • ⚠️ Pricing Unpredictability – Credit-based model most common complaint
  • Market Position – Leading AI model provider; top GPT models as custom AI building blocks
  • Target Customers – Dev teams building bespoke solutions; enterprises needing flexibility beyond RAG
  • Key Competitors – Anthropic Claude API, Google Gemini, Azure AI, AWS Bedrock, RAG platforms
  • ✅ Competitive Advantages – Top GPT-4 performance, frequent upgrades, excellent docs, massive ecosystem, Enterprise SOC 2/SSO
  • ✅ Pricing Advantage – Pay-as-you-go highly cost-effective at small scale; best value low-volume use
  • Use Case Fit – Ideal for custom AI requiring flexibility; less suitable for turnkey RAG without dev resources
  • Market position – Leading RAG platform balancing enterprise accuracy with no-code usability. Trusted by 6,000+ orgs including Adobe, MIT, Dropbox.
  • Key differentiators – #1 benchmarked accuracy • 1,400+ formats • Full white-labeling included • Flat-rate pricing
  • vs OpenAI – 10% lower hallucination, 13% higher accuracy, 34% faster
  • vs Botsonic/Chatbase – More file formats, source citations, no hidden costs
  • vs LangChain – Production-ready in 2 min vs weeks of development
A I Models
  • Default: Claude Sonnet 4.5 – 'Almost no one overrides' per Anthropic
  • Claude Family – Sonnet 4.5, 3.7, Haiku 3.5 (200K context)
  • OpenAI – GPT-5, GPT-4o, GPT-4 Turbo, o3, o1
  • Google – Gemini 2.5 Pro, 2.5 Flash, 2.0 Flash
  • ✅ GPT-4 Family – GPT-4 (8k/32k), GPT-4 Turbo (128k), GPT-4o - top language understanding/generation
  • ✅ GPT-3.5 Family – GPT-3.5 Turbo (4k/16k) cost-effective with good performance
  • ✅ Frequent Upgrades – Regular releases with improved capabilities, larger context windows
  • ⚠️ OpenAI-Only – Cannot swap to Claude, Gemini; locked to OpenAI models
  • ✅ Fine-Tuning – GPT-3.5 fine-tuning for domain-specific customization with training data
  • OpenAI – GPT-5.1 (Optimal/Smart), GPT-4 series
  • Anthropic – Claude 4.5 Opus/Sonnet (Enterprise)
  • Auto-routing – Intelligent model selection for cost/performance
  • Managed – No API keys or fine-tuning required
R A G Capabilities
  • Hybrid Search – Semantic + keyword with Fuzziness slider (0-100)
  • Document Processing – PDF, DOCX, XLSX, CSV, TXT, HTML (20MB)
  • Cloud Integration – Auto 24-hour sync (Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint)
  • ⚠️ Black Box – Vector database, embedding models undisclosed
  • ⚠️ NO Developer Control – Cannot customize retrieval parameters
  • ⚠️ NO Built-In RAG – LLM models only; build entire RAG pipeline yourself
  • ✅ Embeddings API – text-embedding-ada-002 and newer for vector embeddings/semantic search
  • DIY Architecture – Embed docs → external vector DB → retrieve → inject into prompt
  • Azure Assistants Preview – Beta File Search tool; minimal, preview-stage only
  • Framework Integration – Works with LangChain/LlamaIndex (third-party, not OpenAI products)
  • ⚠️ Developer Responsibility – Chunking, indexing, retrieval optimization all require custom code
  • GPT-4 + RAG – Outperforms OpenAI in independent benchmarks
  • Anti-hallucination – Responses grounded in your content only
  • Automatic citations – Clickable source links in every response
  • Sub-second latency – Optimized vector search and caching
  • Scale to 300M words – No performance degradation at scale
Use Cases
  • Sales Automation – Lead qualification, scoring, enrichment, CRM syncing
  • Customer Support – Email triage, routing, FAQ, escalation
  • Voice Agents (Gaia) – 30+ language phone automation with call transfer
  • ⚠️ NOT Ideal For – Developers needing RAG APIs, EU residency
  • ✅ Custom AI Applications – Bespoke solutions requiring maximum flexibility beyond pre-packaged platforms
  • ✅ Code Generation – GitHub Copilot-style tools, IDE integrations, automated review
  • ✅ Creative Writing – Content generation, marketing copy, storytelling at scale
  • ✅ Data Analysis – Natural language queries over structured data, report generation
  • Customer Service – Custom chatbots integrated with business systems and knowledge bases
  • ⚠️ NOT IDEAL FOR – Non-technical teams wanting turnkey RAG chatbot without coding
  • Customer support – 24/7 AI handling common queries with citations
  • Internal knowledge – HR policies, onboarding, technical docs
  • Sales enablement – Product info, lead qualification, education
  • Documentation – Help centers, FAQs with auto-crawling
  • E-commerce – Product recommendations, order assistance
Security & Compliance
  • SOC 2 Type II + HIPAA with BAA – Independently audited
  • GDPR + PIPEDA + CCPA – Multi-region privacy compliance
  • AES-256 + TLS 1.2+ – Encryption at rest and in transit
  • ⚠️ NO ISO 27001 – May limit enterprise procurement
  • ✅ API Data Privacy – Not used for training; 30-day retention for abuse checks only
  • ✅ ChatGPT Enterprise – SOC 2 Type II, SSO, stronger privacy, enterprise-grade security
  • ✅ Encryption – TLS in transit, at rest encryption with enterprise standards
  • ✅ GDPR/HIPAA – DPA for GDPR; BAA for HIPAA; regional data residency available
  • ✅ Zero-Retention Option – Enterprise/API customers can opt for no data retention
  • ⚠️ Developer Responsibility – User auth, input validation, logging entirely on you
  • SOC 2 Type II + GDPR – Regular third-party audits, full EU compliance
  • 256-bit AES encryption – Data at rest; SSL/TLS in transit
  • SSO + 2FA + RBAC – Enterprise access controls with role-based permissions
  • Data isolation – Never trains on customer data
  • Domain allowlisting – Restrict chatbot to approved domains
Pricing & Plans
  • Free: $0 – 400 credits, 1M chars, 1-day logs
  • Pro: $49.99 – 5K credits, 20M chars, phone calls
  • Business: $199.99-$299.99 – 20K-30K credits, 50M chars, branding
  • ⚠️ PRIMARY COMPLAINT – Unpredictable credit consumption difficult to budget
  • ✅ Pay-As-You-Go – $0.0015/1K tokens GPT-3.5; ~$0.03-0.06/1K GPT-4 token pricing
  • ✅ No Platform Fees – Pure consumption pricing; no subscriptions, monthly minimums
  • Rate Limits by Tier – Usage tiers auto-increase limits as spending grows
  • ⚠️ Cost at Scale – Bills spike without optimization; high-volume needs token management
  • External Costs – RAG incurs vector DB (Pinecone, Weaviate) and hosting costs
  • ✅ Best Value For – Low-volume use or teams with existing infrastructure
  • Standard: $99/mo – 10 chatbots, 60M words, 5K items/bot
  • Premium: $449/mo – 100 chatbots, 300M words, 20K items/bot
  • Enterprise: Custom – SSO, dedicated support, custom SLAs
  • 7-day free trial – Full Standard access, no charges
  • Flat-rate pricing – No per-query charges, no hidden costs
Support & Documentation
  • Lindy Academy – Step-by-step tutorials for business users
  • 100+ Templates – Pre-built workflows for common scenarios
  • Slack + Forum – community.lindy.ai for peer support
  • ⚠️ NO Developer Docs – No API reference or technical architecture
  • ✅ Excellent Documentation – Comprehensive guides, API reference, code samples at platform.openai.com
  • ✅ Official SDKs – Well-maintained Python, Node.js libraries with examples
  • ✅ Massive Community – Extensive tutorials, LangChain/LlamaIndex integrations, ecosystem resources
  • ⚠️ Limited Direct Support – Community forums for standard users; Enterprise gets premium support
  • OpenAI Cookbook – Practical examples and recipes for common use cases including RAG
  • Documentation hub – Docs, tutorials, API references
  • Support channels – Email, in-app chat, dedicated managers (Premium+)
  • Open-source – Python SDK, Postman, GitHub examples
  • Community – User community + 5,000 Zapier integrations
Limitations & Considerations
  • NO Public REST API – Cannot manage agents programmatically
  • Black Box RAG – Vector database, embeddings undisclosed
  • Search Constraint – Fuzziness <100 limits to 1,500 files
  • Credit Unpredictability – Most common user complaint about costs
  • ⚠️ Platform Mismatch – Workflow automation vs RAG comparison misleading
  • ⚠️ NO Built-In RAG – Entire retrieval infrastructure must be built by developers
  • ⚠️ Developer-Only – Requires coding expertise; no no-code interface for non-technical teams
  • ⚠️ Rate Limits – Usage tiers start restrictive (Tier 1: 500 RPM GPT-4)
  • ⚠️ Model Lock-In – Cannot use Claude, Gemini; tied to OpenAI ecosystem
  • ⚠️ NO Chat UI – ChatGPT web interface not embeddable or customizable for business
  • ⚠️ Cost at Scale – Token pricing can spike without optimization; needs cost management
  • Managed service – Less control over RAG pipeline vs build-your-own
  • Model selection – OpenAI + Anthropic only; no Cohere, AI21, open-source
  • Real-time data – Requires re-indexing; not ideal for live inventory/prices
  • Enterprise features – Custom SSO only on Enterprise plan
Core Chatbot Features
N/A
  • ✅ Multi-Turn Chat – GPT-4/3.5 handle conversations; you resend history for context
  • ⚠️ No Agent Memory – OpenAI doesn't store conversational state; you manage it
  • Function Calling – Model triggers your functions (search endpoints); you wire retrieval
  • ChatGPT Web UI – Separate from API; not brand-customizable for private data
  • ✅ #1 accuracy – Median 5/5 in independent benchmarks, 10% lower hallucination than OpenAI
  • ✅ Source citations – Every response includes clickable links to original documents
  • ✅ 93% resolution rate – Handles queries autonomously, reducing human workload
  • ✅ 92 languages – Native multilingual support without per-language config
  • ✅ Lead capture – Built-in email collection, custom forms, real-time notifications
  • ✅ Human handoff – Escalation with full conversation context preserved
Customization & Flexibility ( Behavior & Knowledge)
N/A
  • ✅ Fine-Tuning Available – GPT-3.5 fine-tuning for style; knowledge injection via RAG code
  • ⚠️ Content Freshness – Re-embed, re-fine-tune, or pass context each call; developer overhead
  • Tool Calling Power – Powerful moderation/tools but requires thoughtful design; no unified UI
  • Maximum Flexibility – Extremely flexible for general AI; lacks built-in document management
  • Live content updates – Add/remove content with automatic re-indexing
  • System prompts – Shape agent behavior and voice through instructions
  • Multi-agent support – Different bots for different teams
  • Smart defaults – No ML expertise required for custom behavior
Additional Considerations
N/A
  • ✅ Maximum Freedom – Best for bespoke AI solutions beyond RAG (code gen, creative writing)
  • ✅ Regular Upgrades – Frequent model releases with bigger context windows keep tech current
  • ⚠️ Coding Required – Near-infinite customization comes with setup complexity; developer-friendly only
  • Cost Management – Token pricing cost-effective at small scale; maintaining RAG adds ongoing effort
  • Time-to-value – 2-minute deployment vs weeks with DIY
  • Always current – Auto-updates to latest GPT models
  • Proven scale – 6,000+ organizations, millions of queries
  • Multi-LLM – OpenAI + Claude reduces vendor lock-in

Ready to experience the CustomGPT difference?

Start Free Trial →

Final Thoughts

Final Verdict: Lindy.ai vs OpenAI

After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both Lindy.ai and OpenAI are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.

When to Choose Lindy.ai

  • You value exceptional no-code usability: 4.9/5 g2 rating, 30-second setup vs 15-60 min with zapier/make
  • Massive integration ecosystem: 5,000+ apps via Pipedream Connect with 2,500+ pre-built actions
  • Claude Sonnet 4.5 default drives 10x customer growth - best-in-class language understanding

Best For: Exceptional no-code usability: 4.9/5 G2 rating, 30-second setup vs 15-60 min with Zapier/Make

When to Choose OpenAI

  • You value industry-leading model performance
  • Comprehensive API features
  • Regular model updates

Best For: Industry-leading model performance

Migration & Switching Considerations

Switching between Lindy.ai and OpenAI requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.

Pricing Comparison Summary

Lindy.ai starts at custom pricing, while OpenAI begins at custom pricing. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.

Our Recommendation Process

  1. Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
  2. Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
  3. Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
  4. Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
  5. Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality

For most organizations, the decision between Lindy.ai and OpenAI comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.

📚 Next Steps

Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.

  • Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
  • Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
  • Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
  • Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements

Last updated: February 3, 2026 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.

Ready to Get Started with CustomGPT?

Join thousands of businesses that trust CustomGPT for their AI needs. Choose the path that works best for you.

Why Choose CustomGPT?

97% Accuracy

Industry-leading benchmarks

5-Min Setup

Get started instantly

24/7 Support

Expert help when you need it

Enterprise Ready

Scale with confidence

Trusted by leading companies worldwide

Fortune 500Fortune 500Fortune 500Fortune 500Fortune 500Fortune 500

CustomGPT

The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.

Get in touch
Contact Us

Join the Discussion

Loading comments...

Priyansh Khodiyar's avatar

Priyansh Khodiyar

DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.

Watch: Understanding AI Tool Comparisons