In this comprehensive guide, we compare OpenAI and Stonly across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.
Overview
When choosing between OpenAI and Stonly, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose OpenAI if: you value industry-leading model performance
Choose Stonly if: you value exceptional ease of use - 4.8/5 g2 rating with intuitive visual editor praised in 32 reviews
About OpenAI
OpenAI is leading ai research company and api provider. OpenAI provides state-of-the-art language models and AI capabilities through APIs, including GPT-4, assistants with retrieval capabilities, and various AI tools for developers and enterprises. Founded in 2015, headquartered in San Francisco, CA, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
90/100
Starting Price
Custom
About Stonly
Stonly is interactive knowledge base platform with enterprise ai-powered answers. Stonly is a customer support knowledge management platform with embedded AI capabilities focused on interactive step-by-step guides and help desk agent assistance. Its AI Answers feature (Enterprise-only add-on) achieves 71% self-serve success rates, but it's fundamentally a knowledge base platform with AI features—not a pure RAG-as-a-Service solution. Founded in 2017, headquartered in San Francisco, CA, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
96/100
Starting Price
$249/mo
Key Differences at a Glance
In terms of user ratings, Stonly in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, OpenAI starts at a lower price point. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: AI Platform versus Knowledge Management. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.
⚠️ What This Comparison Covers
We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.
Detailed Feature Comparison
OpenAI
Stonly
CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
OpenAI gives you the GPT brains, but no ready-made pipeline for feeding it your documents—if you want RAG, you’ll build it yourself.
The typical recipe: embed your docs with the OpenAI Embeddings API, stash them in a vector DB, then pull back the right chunks at query time.
If you’re using Azure, the “Assistants” preview includes a beta File Search tool that accepts uploads for semantic search, though it’s still minimal and in preview.
You’re in charge of chunking, indexing, and refreshing docs—there’s no turnkey ingestion service straight from OpenAI.
PDF uploads confirmed
Public website crawling: Pages not requiring authentication
Zendesk help center content indexing
Proprietary interactive guide format as primary content model
Note: No Google Drive, Dropbox, Notion, or SharePoint integrations for data ingestion
Note: No YouTube transcript extraction (videos can be embedded but not processed)
Note: No direct Word document (.docx) or HTML file imports confirmed
Note: No automatic content syncing from external sources - updates are manual through Stonly's visual editor
Content limits by tier: Basic (5 guides, 400 views/mo), Small Business (unlimited guides, 4K views/mo), Enterprise (custom)
Content versioning: Side-by-side comparison and instant restore on Business and Enterprise plans
Lets you ingest more than 1,400 file formats—PDF, DOCX, TXT, Markdown, HTML, and many more—via simple drag-and-drop or API.
Crawls entire sites through sitemaps and URLs, automatically indexing public help-desk articles, FAQs, and docs.
Turns multimedia into text on the fly: YouTube videos, podcasts, and other media are auto-transcribed with built-in OCR and speech-to-text.
View Transcription Guide
Connects to Google Drive, SharePoint, Notion, Confluence, HubSpot, and more through API connectors or Zapier.
See Zapier Connectors
Supports both manual uploads and auto-sync retraining, so your knowledge base always stays up to date.
Integrations & Channels
OpenAI doesn’t ship Slack bots or website widgets—you wire GPT into those channels yourself (or lean on third-party libraries).
The API is flexible enough to run anywhere, but everything is manual—no out-of-the-box UI or integration connectors.
Plenty of community and partner options exist (Slack GPT bots, Zapier actions, etc.), yet none are first-party OpenAI products.
Bottom line: OpenAI is channel-agnostic—you get the engine and decide where it lives.
Deep help desk integrations: Zendesk, Salesforce Service Cloud, Freshdesk, ServiceNow
Zendesk features: Update tickets from guides, preserve guide progress in tickets, launch Zendesk Chat from widget
Zapier integration: Webhook triggers for form submissions and guide completions
Analytics integrations: Segment, Google Analytics
Embedding options: JavaScript widget, iframe, API deployment
Note: No native Slack, WhatsApp, Telegram, or Microsoft Teams integrations (confirmed by multiple user reviews)
Note: No omnichannel messaging support
Website embedding: All plans support JS widget and iframe embedding
Embeds easily—a lightweight script or iframe drops the chat widget into any website or mobile app.
Offers ready-made hooks for Slack, Zendesk, Confluence, YouTube, Sharepoint, 100+ more.
Explore API Integrations
Connects with 5,000+ apps via Zapier and webhooks to automate your workflows.
Supports secure deployments with domain allowlisting and a ChatGPT Plugin for private use cases.
Hosted CustomGPT.ai offers hosted MCP Server with support for Claude Web, Claude Desktop, Cursor, ChatGPT, Windsurf, Trae, etc.
Read more here.
You can fine-tune (GPT-3.5) or craft prompts for style, but real-time knowledge injection happens only through your RAG code.
Keeping content fresh means re-embedding, re-fine-tuning, or passing context each call—developer overhead.
Tool calling and moderation are powerful but require thoughtful design; no single UI manages persona or knowledge over time.
Extremely flexible for general AI work, but lacks a built-in document-management layer for live updates.
CSS and HTML customization: Change layout and look of knowledge base with custom code capabilities
Intuitive customization tools: Easy-to-use tools that don't require code for basic customization
Layout customization: Decide how content is structured and presented with flexible options
Design controls: Manage visual components like colors, logo, or cover image for brand alignment
Personalized content: Use customer data to show personalized content from knowledge base for targeted experiences
Data-driven personalization: Customers see what they need right away when first accessing knowledge base
Analytics insights: Guide usage analytics provide insight into customer behavior for continuous improvement
Highly flexible platform: Users appreciate ability to use Stonly for knowledge bases and guided tours with target properties based on specific user needs
Rich media support: Add images, GIFs, videos, and annotations to bring knowledge base content to life
Third-party scripts: Install scripts from other tools like Google Analytics for extended functionality
Lets you add, remove, or tweak content on the fly—automatic re-indexing keeps everything current.
Shapes agent behavior through system prompts and sample Q&A, ensuring a consistent voice and focus.
Learn How to Update Sources
Supports multiple agents per account, so different teams can have their own bots.
Balances hands-on control with smart defaults—no deep ML expertise required to get tailored behavior.
Pricing & Scalability
Pay-as-you-go token billing: GPT-3.5 is cheap (~$0.0015/1K tokens) while GPT-4 costs more (~$0.03-0.06/1K). [OpenAI API Rates]
Great for low usage, but bills can spike at scale; rate limits also apply.
No flat-rate plan—everything is consumption-based, plus you cover any external hosting (e.g., vector DB). [API Reference]
Enterprise contracts unlock higher concurrency, compliance features, and dedicated capacity after a chat with sales.
Basic (Free): 5 guides, 400 views/month, 1 seat, single language
Small Business ($249/mo, $199/mo annual): Unlimited guides, 4,000 views/month, 5 seats, 3 knowledge bases, CSS customization, Zapier, NPS surveys
Enterprise (Custom, ~$39K/year avg): Custom views, unlimited seats, AI Answers add-on, Mobile SDKs, SAML SSO, white-label, auto-translation, CSAT/CES surveys
Quick onboarding: Users report creating guides in under 30 minutes
Supplies rich docs, tutorials, cookbooks, and FAQs to get you started fast.
Developer Docs
Offers quick email and in-app chat support—Premium and Enterprise plans add dedicated managers and faster SLAs.
Enterprise Solutions
Benefits from an active user community plus integrations through Zapier and GitHub resources.
Additional Considerations
Great when you need maximum freedom to build bespoke AI solutions, or tasks beyond RAG (code gen, creative writing, etc.).
Regular model upgrades and bigger context windows keep the tech cutting-edge.
Best suited to teams comfortable writing code—near-infinite customization comes with setup complexity.
Token pricing is cost-effective at small scale but can climb quickly; maintaining RAG adds ongoing dev effort.
Limited UI customization: Limited ability to customize user interface and workflows to match specific brand requirements is primary user concern
Basic collaboration tools: Without real-time editing or advanced team management features can hinder team productivity when multiple people need to work together
No offline access: Guides unavailable without internet connectivity reducing usability in areas with unreliable internet
Performance degradation: Can degrade with very large or complex guides causing slower responsiveness indicating scalability concerns
Restricted language options: Limit efficient creation of multilingual content which may be barrier for global organizations
Mixed media support missing: Users find missing features wishing for mixed media support and enhanced reporting tools
Step ordering difficulties: Users report limitations in feature usability and difficulties with step ordering though support offers helpful workarounds
Requires coding knowledge: Unlike most competitors, doesn't advertise as no-code platform - need coding knowledge to track events, target users, stream data, and style content
Image workflow limitations: Inability to use images in base offering limits utility in some workflows with some advanced features requiring extra costs
View-based pricing: Charges additional fees based on guide views - customers exceeding 4,000 guide views/month pay extra $250-500 monthly depending on volume
Integration reliability: Users find lack of integrations limits ability to fully connect Stonly with other tools - Stonly/Zendesk integration isn't as reliable as desired (stops working every few weeks)
Slashes engineering overhead with an all-in-one RAG platform—no in-house ML team required.
Gets you to value quickly: launch a functional AI assistant in minutes.
Stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements, so you’re always on the latest tech.
Balances top-tier accuracy with ease of use, perfect for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects.
No- Code Interface & Usability
OpenAI alone isn't no-code for RAG—you'll code embeddings, retrieval, and the chat UI.
The ChatGPT web app is user-friendly, yet you can't embed it on your site with your data or branding by default.
No-code tools like Zapier or Bubble offer partial integrations, but official OpenAI no-code options are minimal.
Extremely capable for developers; less so for non-technical teams wanting a self-serve domain chatbot.
4.8/5 ease of use rating on G2
"Ease of use" mentioned 32 times in G2 reviews
Visual drag-and-drop editor requires no coding
Small learning curve - non-technical teams productive quickly
Guide creation in under 30 minutes reported by users
Pre-built templates for common scenarios
Intuitive interface for support teams
Note: Some navigation confusion reported in admin interface
Note: Cannot edit on mobile devices
Offers a wizard-style web dashboard so non-devs can upload content, brand the widget, and monitor performance.
Supports drag-and-drop uploads, visual theme editing, and in-browser chatbot testing.
User Experience Review
Uses role-based access so business users and devs can collaborate smoothly.
Competitive Positioning
Market position: Leading AI model provider offering state-of-the-art GPT models (GPT-4, GPT-3.5) as building blocks for custom AI applications, requiring developer implementation for RAG functionality
Target customers: Development teams building bespoke AI solutions, enterprises needing maximum flexibility for diverse AI use cases beyond RAG (code generation, creative writing, analysis), and organizations comfortable with DIY RAG implementation using LangChain/LlamaIndex frameworks
Key competitors: Anthropic Claude API, Google Gemini API, Azure AI, AWS Bedrock, and complete RAG platforms like CustomGPT/Vectara that bundle retrieval infrastructure
Competitive advantages: Industry-leading GPT-4 model performance, frequent model upgrades with larger context windows (128k), excellent developer documentation with official Python/Node.js SDKs, massive community ecosystem with extensive tutorials and third-party integrations, ChatGPT Enterprise for compliance-friendly deployment with SOC 2/SSO, and API data not used for training (30-day retention for abuse checks only)
Pricing advantage: Pay-as-you-go token pricing highly cost-effective at small scale ($0.0015/1K tokens GPT-3.5, $0.03-0.06/1K GPT-4); no platform fees or subscriptions beyond API usage; best value for low-volume use cases or teams with existing infrastructure (vector DB, embeddings) who only need LLM layer; can become expensive at scale without optimization
Use case fit: Ideal for developers building custom AI solutions requiring maximum flexibility, teams working on diverse AI tasks beyond RAG (code generation, creative writing, analysis), and organizations with existing ML infrastructure who want best-in-class LLM without bundled RAG platform; less suitable for teams wanting turnkey RAG chatbot without development resources
Unique strength: Interactive guide format for structured support content
vs CustomGPT: Not comparable - different product categories (knowledge base vs RAG-as-a-Service)
vs Zendesk: Lighter-weight alternative focused on self-service guides vs full customer service platform
vs traditional chatbots: Interactive guides provide structured paths vs free-form conversation
Target audience: Support teams using Zendesk/Salesforce, not developers building RAG applications
70-76% ticket reduction documented in case studies
71% self-serve success rate with AI Answers
Enterprise compliance suitable for regulated industries
Market position: Leading all-in-one RAG platform balancing enterprise-grade accuracy with developer-friendly APIs and no-code usability for rapid deployment
Target customers: Mid-market to enterprise organizations needing production-ready AI assistants, development teams wanting robust APIs without building RAG infrastructure, and businesses requiring 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription (YouTube, podcasts)
Key competitors: OpenAI Assistants API, Botsonic, Chatbase.co, Azure AI, and custom RAG implementations using LangChain
Competitive advantages: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling included, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, hosted MCP Server support (Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT), generous data limits (60M words Standard, 300M Premium), and flat monthly pricing without per-query charges
Pricing advantage: Transparent flat-rate pricing at $99/month (Standard) and $449/month (Premium) with generous included limits; no hidden costs for API access, branding removal, or basic features; best value for teams needing both no-code dashboard and developer APIs in one platform
Use case fit: Ideal for businesses needing both rapid no-code deployment and robust API capabilities, organizations handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), teams requiring white-label chatbots with source citations for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects, and companies wanting all-in-one RAG without managing ML infrastructure
A I Models
GPT-4 Family: GPT-4 (8k/32k context), GPT-4 Turbo (128k context), GPT-4o (optimized) - industry-leading language understanding and generation
GPT-3.5 Family: GPT-3.5 Turbo (4k/16k context) - cost-effective for high-volume applications with good performance
Frequent Model Upgrades: Regular releases with improved capabilities, larger context windows, and better performance benchmarks
OpenAI-Only Ecosystem: Cannot swap to Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, or other providers - locked to OpenAI models
No Auto-Routing: Developers explicitly choose which model to call per request - no automatic GPT-3.5/GPT-4 selection based on complexity
Fine-Tuning Available: GPT-3.5 fine-tuning for domain-specific customization with training data
Cutting-Edge Performance: GPT-4 consistently ranks top-tier for language tasks, reasoning, and complex problem-solving in benchmarks
Undisclosed Proprietary LLM: Stonly does not publicly disclose the specific model powering AI Answers feature
No Model Selection: Users cannot choose between GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, or other LLM providers
No Temperature Controls: No user-facing controls for adjusting response creativity, randomness, or formatting
No Fine-Tuning or Model Routing: Cannot customize model behavior beyond predefined AI Profiles and Custom Instructions
AI Profiles (Up to 20): Define tone, boundaries, and behavior for different use cases or audiences
Custom Instructions (Up to 100): Set specific rules and style guidelines for AI response generation
Guided AI Answers: Predefined responses for specific questions bypassing AI generation for sensitive scenarios
Automatic Fallback: Low-confidence scenarios trigger fallback to ML-powered search rather than forcing unreliable AI answer
Knowledge-Grounded Approach: AI responses anchored in Stonly guides, external websites, and PDFs to reduce hallucinations
Primary models: GPT-4, GPT-3.5 Turbo from OpenAI, and Anthropic's Claude for enterprise needs
Automatic model selection: Balances cost and performance by automatically selecting the appropriate model for each request
Model Selection Details
Proprietary optimizations: Custom prompt engineering and retrieval enhancements for high-quality, citation-backed answers
Managed infrastructure: All model management handled behind the scenes - no API keys or fine-tuning required from users
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms ensure chatbot only answers based on provided content, improving trust and factual accuracy
R A G Capabilities
NO Built-In RAG: OpenAI provides LLM models only - developers must build entire RAG pipeline (embeddings, vector DB, retrieval, prompting)
Embeddings API: text-embedding-ada-002 and newer models for generating vector embeddings from text for semantic search
DIY Architecture: Typical RAG implementation: embed documents → store in external vector DB (Pinecone, Weaviate) → retrieve at query time → inject into GPT prompt
Azure Assistants Preview: Azure OpenAI Service offers beta File Search tool with uploads for semantic search (minimal, preview-stage)
Function Calling: Enables GPT to trigger external functions (like retrieval endpoints) but requires developer implementation
Framework Integration: Works with LangChain, LlamaIndex for RAG scaffolding - but these are third-party tools, not OpenAI products
NO Turnkey RAG Service: Unlike RAG platforms with managed infrastructure, OpenAI leaves retrieval architecture entirely to developers
AI Answers (Enterprise Add-On): Generative AI responses grounded in Stonly guides, external websites, and selected PDFs
Knowledge-Grounding: Responses anchored to structured content (interactive guides, decision trees, checklists) reducing hallucinations vs generic chatbots
Confidence-Based Fallback: Automatic switch to ML-powered search when AI confidence is low preventing unreliable answers
Multi-Source Ingestion: PDF uploads, public website crawling, Zendesk help center content indexing
Interactive Guide Format: Proprietary content model combining structured workflows with AI-generated answers
Limited Data Sources: No Google Drive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint, or YouTube transcript extraction
Manual Content Updates: Updates through Stonly's visual editor—no automatic syncing from external sources
71% Self-Serve Success Rate: Documented effectiveness of AI Answers in reducing support escalations
Hallucination Controls: Strong grounding in structured content vs open-ended conversational AI
Core architecture: GPT-4 combined with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology, outperforming OpenAI in RAG benchmarks
RAG Performance
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms reduce hallucinations and ensure responses are grounded in provided content
Benchmark Details
Automatic citations: Each response includes clickable citations pointing to original source documents for transparency and verification
Optimized pipeline: Efficient vector search, smart chunking, and caching for sub-second reply times
Scalability: Maintains speed and accuracy for massive knowledge bases with tens of millions of words
Context-aware conversations: Multi-turn conversations with persistent history and comprehensive conversation management
Source verification: Always cites sources so users can verify facts on the spot
Use Cases
Custom AI Applications: Building bespoke solutions requiring maximum flexibility beyond pre-packaged chatbot platforms
Code Generation: GitHub Copilot-style tools, IDE integrations, automated code review, and development acceleration
Creative Writing: Content generation, marketing copy, storytelling, and creative ideation at scale
Data Analysis: Natural language queries over structured data, report generation, and insight extraction
Customer Service: Custom chatbots for support workflows integrated with business systems and knowledge bases
Education: Tutoring systems, adaptive learning platforms, and educational content generation
Research & Summarization: Document analysis, literature review, and multi-document summarization
Enterprise Automation: Workflow automation, document processing, and business intelligence with ChatGPT Enterprise
NOT IDEAL FOR: Non-technical teams wanting turnkey RAG chatbot without coding - better served by complete RAG platforms
Customer Support Ticket Deflection: 70-76% ticket reduction through interactive self-service guides and AI Answers
Help Desk Integration: Deep Zendesk, Salesforce Service Cloud, Freshdesk, ServiceNow integration for unified support workflows
Interactive Onboarding: Step-by-step guides, decision trees, and checklists for product onboarding and user education
Knowledge Base Enhancement: Augment traditional help centers with interactive guides and AI-powered search
Agent Assistance: Provide support agents with guided workflows and AI answers during live interactions
Multi-Language Support: Auto-translation on Enterprise plan for global support teams and multilingual customers
Complex Troubleshooting: Decision tree logic guides users through multi-step troubleshooting processes
Compliance & Training: Structured guides ensuring consistent information delivery for regulated industries
Customer support automation: AI assistants handling common queries, reducing support ticket volume, providing 24/7 instant responses with source citations
Internal knowledge management: Employee self-service for HR policies, technical documentation, onboarding materials, company procedures across 1,400+ file formats
Sales enablement: Product information chatbots, lead qualification, customer education with white-labeled widgets on websites and apps
Documentation assistance: Technical docs, help centers, FAQs with automatic website crawling and sitemap indexing
Educational platforms: Course materials, research assistance, student support with multimedia content (YouTube transcriptions, podcasts)
Healthcare information: Patient education, medical knowledge bases (SOC 2 Type II compliant for sensitive data)
Automatic Tier Upgrades: Exceeding limits for 2 consecutive months triggers automatic upgrade and billing adjustment
Enterprise-Gated Features: AI Answers, Mobile SDKs, SAML SSO, white-labeling all require Enterprise plan
Average Enterprise Contract: ~$39,000 annually according to Vendr procurement data
Standard Plan: $99/month or $89/month annual - 10 custom chatbots, 5,000 items per chatbot, 60 million words per bot, basic helpdesk support, standard security
View Pricing
Premium Plan: $499/month or $449/month annual - 100 custom chatbots, 20,000 items per chatbot, 300 million words per bot, advanced support, enhanced security, additional customization
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing - Comprehensive AI solutions, highest security and compliance, dedicated account managers, custom SSO, token authentication, priority support with faster SLAs
Enterprise Solutions
7-Day Free Trial: Full access to Standard features without charges - available to all users
Annual billing discount: Save 10% by paying upfront annually ($89/mo Standard, $449/mo Premium)
Flat monthly rates: No per-query charges, no hidden costs for API access or white-labeling (included in all plans)
Managed infrastructure: Auto-scaling cloud infrastructure included - no additional hosting or scaling fees
Support & Documentation
Excellent Documentation: Comprehensive at platform.openai.com with API reference, guides, code samples, and best practices
Official SDKs: Python, Node.js, and other language libraries with well-maintained code examples and tutorials
No Real-Time Analytics: Flow reports update every 15 minutes—not true real-time monitoring
Limited Developer API: No Python/Node.js SDKs, GraphQL, Swagger specs, or API sandbox for testing
Overage Pricing Escalation: View limits can trigger expensive automatic upgrades after 2 consecutive months
Not Ideal For: Developers seeking pure RAG API, multi-tenant SaaS RAG backends, use cases needing model selection/fine-tuning, or flexible data source integration
Managed service approach: Less control over underlying RAG pipeline configuration compared to build-your-own solutions like LangChain
Vendor lock-in: Proprietary platform - migration to alternative RAG solutions requires rebuilding knowledge bases
Model selection: Limited to OpenAI (GPT-4, GPT-3.5) and Anthropic (Claude) - no support for other LLM providers (Cohere, AI21, open-source models)
Pricing at scale: Flat-rate pricing may become expensive for very high-volume use cases (millions of queries/month) compared to pay-per-use models
Customization limits: While highly configurable, some advanced RAG techniques (custom reranking, hybrid search strategies) may not be exposed
Language support: Supports 90+ languages but performance may vary for less common languages or specialized domains
Real-time data: Knowledge bases require re-indexing for updates - not ideal for real-time data requirements (stock prices, live inventory)
Enterprise features: Some advanced features (custom SSO, token authentication) only available on Enterprise plan with custom pricing
Core Agent Features
Assistants API (v2): Build AI assistants with built-in conversation history management, persistent threads, and tool access - removes need to manually track context
Function Calling: Models can describe and invoke external functions/tools - describe structure to Assistant and receive function calls with arguments to execute
Parallel Tool Execution: Assistants access multiple tools simultaneously - Code Interpreter, File Search, and custom functions via function calling in parallel
Built-In Tools: OpenAI-hosted Code Interpreter (Python code execution in sandbox), File Search (retrieval over uploaded files in beta), web search (Responses API only)
Responses API (New 2024): New primitive combining Chat Completions simplicity with Assistants tool-use capabilities - supports web search, file search, computer use
Structured Outputs: Launched June 2024 - strict: true in function definition guarantees arguments match JSON Schema exactly for reliable parsing
Assistants API Deprecation: Plans to deprecate Assistants API after Responses API achieves feature parity - target sunset H1 2026
Custom Tool Integration: Build and host custom tools accessed through function calling - agents can invoke your APIs, databases, services
Multi-Turn Conversations: Assistants maintain conversation state across multiple turns without manual history management
Agent Limitations: Less control vs LangChain/LlamaIndex for complex agentic workflows - simpler assistant paradigm not full autonomous agents
NO Multi-Agent Orchestration: No built-in support for coordinating multiple specialized agents - requires custom implementation
Tool Use Growth: Function calling enables agentic behavior where model decides when to take action vs always responding with text
Conversational AI Bot: Delivers confident answers backed by verified structured knowledge unlike generic LLMs that can hallucinate or invent answers
Knowledge-grounded responses: Provides answers backed by verified structured knowledge from guides you create preventing fabricated information
AI Agent Assist: Automatically summarizes tickets, suggests right path to resolution, and generates responses for support agents
Three core automation functions: Automatically analyzes and summarizes support ticket content, recommends most relevant Stonly guide/knowledge path to resolve issues, drafts complete responses for agents to review/edit/send
Process automation: Define processes to be followed and link them to different back-office tools to resolve customer requests before they reach support
Personalized knowledge: AI-powered solutions and process automation allow creation of guides, walkthroughs, checklists, knowledge bases adapting to each customer's needs
71% self-serve success rate: With AI Answers feature documented in company data
Hallucination reduction: Knowledge-grounding approach vs generic chatbots reduces off-topic responses
Custom AI Agents: Build autonomous agents powered by GPT-4 and Claude that can perform tasks independently and make real-time decisions based on business knowledge
Decision-Support Capabilities: AI agents analyze proprietary data to provide insights, recommendations, and actionable responses specific to your business domain
Multi-Agent Systems: Deploy multiple specialized AI agents that can collaborate and optimize workflows in areas like customer support, sales, and internal knowledge management
Memory & Context Management: Agents maintain conversation history and persistent context for coherent multi-turn interactions
View Agent Documentation
Tool Integration: Agents can trigger actions, integrate with external APIs via webhooks, and connect to 5,000+ apps through Zapier for automated workflows
Hyper-Accurate Responses: Leverages advanced RAG technology and retrieval mechanisms to deliver context-aware, citation-backed responses grounded in your knowledge base
Continuous Learning: Agents improve over time through automatic re-indexing of knowledge sources and integration of new data without manual retraining
R A G-as-a- Service Assessment
Platform Type: NOT RAG-AS-A-SERVICE - OpenAI provides LLM models and basic tool APIs, not managed RAG infrastructure
Core Focus: Best-in-class language models (GPT-4, GPT-3.5) as building blocks - RAG implementation entirely on developers
DIY RAG Architecture: Typical workflow: embed docs with Embeddings API → store in external vector DB (Pinecone/Weaviate) → retrieve at query time → inject into prompt
File Search Tool (Beta): Azure OpenAI Assistants preview includes minimal File Search for semantic search over uploads - still preview-stage, not production RAG service
No Managed Infrastructure: Unlike true RaaS (CustomGPT, Vectara, Nuclia), OpenAI leaves chunking, indexing, retrieval, vector storage to developers
Framework Integration: Works with LangChain, LlamaIndex for RAG scaffolding - but these are third-party tools, not OpenAI products
Framework vs Service: Comparison to RAG-as-a-Service platforms invalid - fundamentally different category (LLM API vs managed RAG platform)
Best Comparison Category: Direct LLM APIs (Anthropic Claude API, Google Gemini API, AWS Bedrock) or developer frameworks (LangChain) NOT managed RAG services
Use Case Fit: Teams building custom AI applications requiring maximum LLM flexibility vs organizations wanting turnkey RAG chatbot without coding
Core Architecture: Serverless RAG infrastructure with automatic embedding generation, vector search optimization, and LLM orchestration fully managed behind API endpoints
API-First Design: Comprehensive REST API with well-documented endpoints for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data (1,400+ formats), and querying chat
API Documentation
Developer Experience: Open-source Python SDK (customgpt-client), Postman collections, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, and extensive cookbooks for rapid integration
No-Code Alternative: Wizard-style web dashboard enables non-developers to upload content, brand widgets, and deploy chatbots without touching code
Hybrid Target Market: Serves both developer teams wanting robust APIs AND business users seeking no-code RAG deployment - unique positioning vs pure API platforms (Cohere) or pure no-code tools (Jotform)
RAG Technology Leadership: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, proprietary anti-hallucination mechanisms, and citation-backed responses
Benchmark Details
Deployment Flexibility: Cloud-hosted SaaS with auto-scaling, API integrations, embedded chat widgets, ChatGPT Plugin support, and hosted MCP Server for Claude/Cursor/ChatGPT
Enterprise Readiness: SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling, domain allowlisting, RBAC with 2FA/SSO, and flat-rate pricing without per-query charges
Use Case Fit: Ideal for organizations needing both rapid no-code deployment AND robust API capabilities, teams handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), and businesses requiring production-ready RAG without building ML infrastructure from scratch
Competitive Positioning: Bridges the gap between developer-first platforms (Cohere, Deepset) requiring heavy coding and no-code chatbot builders (Jotform, Kommunicate) lacking API depth - offers best of both worlds
Core Knowledge Base Features
N/A
Interactive step-by-step guides with visual flow builder
After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both OpenAI and Stonly are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.
When to Choose OpenAI
You value industry-leading model performance
Comprehensive API features
Regular model updates
Best For: Industry-leading model performance
When to Choose Stonly
You value exceptional ease of use - 4.8/5 g2 rating with intuitive visual editor praised in 32 reviews
Deep help desk integrations - bidirectional Zendesk, Salesforce, Freshdesk, ServiceNow connections
Strong compliance - SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, HIPAA, ISO 27001, PCI, CSA Star Level 1
Best For: Exceptional ease of use - 4.8/5 G2 rating with intuitive visual editor praised in 32 reviews
Migration & Switching Considerations
Switching between OpenAI and Stonly requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.
Pricing Comparison Summary
OpenAI starts at custom pricing, while Stonly begins at $249/month. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.
Our Recommendation Process
Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality
For most organizations, the decision between OpenAI and Stonly comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.
📚 Next Steps
Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.
• Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
• Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
• Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
• Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements
Last updated: December 4, 2025 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.
The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.
DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.
People Also Compare
Explore more AI tool comparisons to find the perfect solution for your needs
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...