Fini AI vs Lindy.ai

Make an informed decision with our comprehensive comparison. Discover which RAG solution perfectly fits your needs.

More about Lindy.aiMore about Fini AIGet Started Today
Priyansh Khodiyar's avatar
Priyansh KhodiyarDevRel at CustomGPT.ai

Fact checked and reviewed by Bill Cava

Published: 01.04.2025Updated: 25.04.2025

In this comprehensive guide, we compare Fini AI and Lindy.ai across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.

Overview

When choosing between Fini AI and Lindy.ai, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.

Quick Decision Guide

  • Choose Fini AI if: you value industry-leading 97-98% accuracy claim backed by customer testimonials
  • Choose Lindy.ai if: you value exceptional no-code usability: 4.9/5 g2 rating, 30-second setup vs 15-60 min with zapier/make

About Fini AI

Fini AI Landing Page Screenshot

Fini AI is ragless ai agent for customer support automation. Fini AI is a next-generation customer support platform built on proprietary RAGless architecture, claiming 97-98% accuracy. Founded by ex-Uber engineers and backed by Y Combinator, Fini specializes in action-taking AI agents that execute refunds, update accounts, and verify identities—going beyond traditional RAG document retrieval. Founded in 2022, headquartered in Amsterdam, Netherlands, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.

Overall Rating
91/100
Starting Price
Custom

About Lindy.ai

Lindy.ai Landing Page Screenshot

Lindy.ai is ai-powered personal assistant for workflow automation. No-code AI agent platform positioning as 'AI employees' for workflow automation, NOT developer-focused RAG platform. 5,000+ integrations via Pipedream, Claude Sonnet 4.5 default, $5.1M revenue (Oct 2024), 4.9/5 G2 rating. Critical limitation: No public API or SDKs available. Founded in 2023, headquartered in San Francisco, CA, USA, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.

Overall Rating
81/100
Starting Price
Custom

Key Differences at a Glance

In terms of user ratings, Fini AI in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, pricing is comparable. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: AI Agent versus AI Assistant. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.

⚠️ What This Comparison Covers

We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.

Detailed Feature Comparison

logo of finai
Fini AI
logo of lindy
Lindy.ai
logo of customGPT logo
CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
  • File Support – PDF, Word, text, JSON, YAML, CSV; full website crawling
  • Cloud Integrations – Native Google Drive, Notion, Confluence, Guru (⚠️ no Dropbox)
  • Chat2KB (Growth/Enterprise) – Auto-extracts Q&A from conversations with conflict resolution
  • Real-time Updates – Starter 50 docs → Growth 1K → Enterprise unlimited
  • ⚠️ YouTube transcripts NOT supported – LLMs "not great at video interpretation"
  • Document Formats – PDF, DOCX, XLSX, CSV, TXT, HTML (20MB per file)
  • Cloud Integrations – Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint, auto 24-hour sync
  • ⚠️ Storage Limits – 1M chars (Free), 20M (Pro), 50M (Business)
  • ⚠️ Search Constraint – Fuzziness <100 limits to first 1,500 files
  • 1,400+ file formats – PDF, DOCX, Excel, PowerPoint, Markdown, HTML + auto-extraction from ZIP/RAR/7Z archives
  • Website crawling – Sitemap indexing with configurable depth for help docs, FAQs, and public content
  • Multimedia transcription – AI Vision, OCR, YouTube/Vimeo/podcast speech-to-text built-in
  • Cloud integrations – Google Drive, SharePoint, OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion with auto-sync
  • Knowledge platforms – Zendesk, Freshdesk, HubSpot, Confluence, Shopify connectors
  • Massive scale – 60M words (Standard) / 300M words (Premium) per bot with no performance degradation
Integrations & Channels
  • 20+ Native Helpdesk Integrations – Zendesk, Intercom, Salesforce, Front, Gorgias, HubSpot (⚠️ no Zapier)
  • Omnichannel – Slack, Discord, Teams; WhatsApp/Messenger via Zendesk/Intercom (⚠️ not Telegram)
  • Website Options – Fini Widget, Search Bar, Standalone; Chrome Extension for agents
  • 5,000+ Apps – Via Pipedream Connect with 2,500+ ready actions
  • Messaging – Slack, WhatsApp, Teams, Telegram, Discord, Twilio SMS
  • CRM – Salesforce (24 actions), HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho CRM
  • Productivity – Notion, Airtable, Google Workspace (Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Sheets, Drive)
  • Webhooks + HTTP – Inbound triggers and outbound API calls
  • Website embedding – Lightweight JS widget or iframe with customizable positioning
  • CMS plugins – WordPress, WIX, Webflow, Framer, SquareSpace native support
  • 5,000+ app ecosystem – Zapier connects CRMs, marketing, e-commerce tools
  • MCP Server – Integrate with Claude Desktop, Cursor, ChatGPT, Windsurf
  • OpenAI SDK compatible – Drop-in replacement for OpenAI API endpoints
  • LiveChat + Slack – Native chat widgets with human handoff capabilities
Core Chatbot Features
  • Sophie AI Agent – 5-layer execution: Safety, LLM Supervisor, Skills, Feedback, Traceability
  • 100+ Languages – Locale-based routing with real-time translation
  • Human Handoff – Context-preserving escalation via keywords, sentiment, confidence thresholds
  • ✅ 80% Ticket Resolution – End-to-end without human intervention claim
N/A
  • ✅ #1 accuracy – Median 5/5 in independent benchmarks, 10% lower hallucination than OpenAI
  • ✅ Source citations – Every response includes clickable links to original documents
  • ✅ 93% resolution rate – Handles queries autonomously, reducing human workload
  • ✅ 92 languages – Native multilingual support without per-language config
  • ✅ Lead capture – Built-in email collection, custom forms, real-time notifications
  • ✅ Human handoff – Escalation with full conversation context preserved
Customization & Branding
  • GUI Widget Editor – Logo, colors, title, messages, FAQs (⚠️ CSS not documented)
  • White-Labeling – Custom domain (CNAME), full logo replacement, agent identity renaming
  • 100+ Tone Options – Friendly, Professional, TaxAssistant, Finance advisor, Casual, polite
  • Dynamic Routing – User context (VIP, first-time, veteran) for metadata-driven personalization
  • Widget – Custom name, accent color, logo for expanded/collapsed states
  • Domain Restrictions – Control allowed deployment domains
  • Memory Snippets – Learning preferences saved across sessions
  • ⚠️ White-Label Unclear – Complete branding removal not explicitly confirmed
  • Full white-labeling included – Colors, logos, CSS, custom domains at no extra cost
  • 2-minute setup – No-code wizard with drag-and-drop interface
  • Persona customization – Control AI personality, tone, response style via pre-prompts
  • Visual theme editor – Real-time preview of branding changes
  • Domain allowlisting – Restrict embedding to approved sites only
L L M Model Options
  • Starter (Free) – GPT-4o mini only
  • Growth – GPT-4o mini + Claude
  • Enterprise – GPT-4o + Multi-layer automatic routing per query part
  • RAGless Architecture – Query-writing AI; "no embeddings, no hallucinations"
  • ⚠️ No Runtime Switching – Plan-based selection only
  • Anthropic Claude – Sonnet 4.5 (default), Sonnet 3.7, Haiku 3.5
  • OpenAI – GPT-5, GPT-5 Codex, GPT-4o, GPT-4 Turbo, o3, o1
  • Google Gemini – 2.5 Pro, 2.5 Flash, 2.0 Flash
  • Per-Action Selection – Manual model choice affects credit consumption
  • ⚠️ No Auto-Routing – No dynamic model switching
  • GPT-5.1 models – Latest thinking models (Optimal & Smart variants)
  • GPT-4 series – GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-4o available
  • Claude 4.5 – Anthropic's Opus available for Enterprise
  • Auto model routing – Balances cost/performance automatically
  • Zero API key management – All models managed behind the scenes
Developer Experience ( A P I & S D Ks)
  • Base URL – https://api-prod.usefini.com (v2, Bearer Token auth)
  • Core Endpoints – /v2/bots/ask-question, /v2/bots/links/*, feedback, chat history
  • ⚠️ NO Official SDKs – Only Python and Node.js examples
  • Documentation Quality – 3/5 completeness, 2/5 error handling, 1/5 rate limits
  • Paramount – Open-source tool (github.com/ask-fini/paramount) for accuracy measurement
  • ⚠️ CRITICAL LIMITATION – NO public REST API, GraphQL, or SDKs
  • Workarounds Only – Inbound webhooks, HTTP actions, Code sandboxes (~150ms)
  • User-Focused Docs – Lindy Academy for business users, NO API reference
  • REST API – Full-featured for agents, projects, data ingestion, chat queries
  • Python SDK – Open-source customgpt-client with full API coverage
  • Postman collections – Pre-built requests for rapid prototyping
  • Webhooks – Real-time event notifications for conversations and leads
  • OpenAI compatible – Use existing OpenAI SDK code with minimal changes
Performance & Accuracy
  • ✅ 97-98% Accuracy Claim – Column Tax (94%, 98% resolved), Qogita (90%, 121% SLA)
  • 6 Hallucination Prevention – RAGless, LLM filtering, confidence gating, guardrails, skill modules
  • Accuracy Tools – Sophia AI Evaluator (Growth/Enterprise), Paramount, CXACT Benchmarking
  • ✅ 80% Ticket Resolution – End-to-end without human intervention
  • Hybrid Search – Semantic + keyword with Fuzziness slider (0-100)
  • Hallucination Reduction – Human confirmation before actions
  • ⚠️ NO Published Benchmarks – No RAG accuracy or latency metrics
  • ⚠️ Black Box – Vector database and embedding models undisclosed
  • Sub-second responses – Optimized RAG with vector search and multi-layer caching
  • Benchmark-proven – 13% higher accuracy, 34% faster than OpenAI Assistants API
  • Anti-hallucination tech – Responses grounded only in your provided content
  • OpenGraph citations – Rich visual cards with titles, descriptions, images
  • 99.9% uptime – Auto-scaling infrastructure handles traffic spikes
Customization & Flexibility ( Behavior & Knowledge)
  • Guidelines System – Tone, phrases, forbidden terms, formatting, response length
  • Bot Management – Starter 2 bots → Growth/Enterprise unlimited
  • Real-time Learning – Chat2KB auto-learning (MECE), Flows for specialized workflows
  • Dynamic Personalization – User context from backend, segment-based routing
N/A
  • Live content updates – Add/remove content with automatic re-indexing
  • System prompts – Shape agent behavior and voice through instructions
  • Multi-agent support – Different bots for different teams
  • Smart defaults – No ML expertise required for custom behavior
Pricing & Scalability
  • ⚠️ Pricing NOT Publicly Disclosed – Requires sales contact
  • Starter (Free) – GPT-4o mini, ~50 questions/month, ~50 docs, 2 bots
  • Growth (est. $999/mo) – GPT-4o mini/Claude, 1K docs, unlimited users, SOC 2, RBAC, Chat2KB
  • Enterprise (Custom) – GPT-4o, Multi-layer models, unlimited docs, AI Actions, white-glove onboarding
  • ✅ Zero-Pay Guarantee – Only pay if >80% accuracy met
  • Free: $0 – 400 credits, 1M char knowledge base
  • Pro: $49.99 – 5,000 credits, 20M chars, phone calls, Lindy branding
  • Business: $199.99-$299.99 – 20K-30K credits, 50M chars, custom branding
  • Enterprise: Custom – SSO, SCIM, dedicated support, custom training
  • ⚠️ Unpredictable Costs – Credit depletion speed is primary user complaint
  • Standard: $99/mo – 60M words, 10 bots
  • Premium: $449/mo – 300M words, 100 bots
  • Auto-scaling – Managed cloud scales with demand
  • Flat rates – No per-query charges
Security & Privacy
  • ✅ Certifications – SOC 2 Type II (zero findings), ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR
  • ⚠️ HIPAA Conflicting – Marketing claims vs. case study "next up" (verify)
  • ⚠️ PCI DSS – Claimed but not on official security section (verify)
  • PII Shield – Auto-masks SSN, passport, license, taxpayer ID, credit cards
  • Encryption – AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.3 in transit; "no training" policy
  • Access Controls – RBAC (Growth/Enterprise), SSO, audit logging, EU/US data residency
  • SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, PIPEDA, CCPA – Comprehensive compliance
  • Encryption – AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.2+ in transit
  • Enterprise SSO + SCIM – Automated user lifecycle management
  • ⚠️ US Data Residency Only – No explicit EU option documented
  • SOC 2 Type II + GDPR – Third-party audited compliance
  • Encryption – 256-bit AES at rest, SSL/TLS in transit
  • Access controls – RBAC, 2FA, SSO, domain allowlisting
  • Data isolation – Never trains on your data
Observability & Monitoring
  • Fini 2.0 (Jan 2025) – AI resolution, quality, confidence, CSAT, agent productivity, drop-off analysis
  • Chat History (Feb 2025) – Centralized view with filtering; CSV/JSON export for Looker/Tableau
  • AI Categorization – Auto-tags by topic (returns, login, pricing, shipping)
  • Knowledge Gap Analysis – Identifies unanswerable questions with improvement suggestions
  • Workflow Performance – Agent action visibility with recent runs
  • Audit Logs – User actions, data access on Business/Enterprise plans
  • ⚠️ Log Retention – 1 day (Free) severely constrains troubleshooting
  • ⚠️ NO RAG Metrics – Cannot track retrieval precision or recall
  • Real-time dashboard – Query volumes, token usage, response times
  • Customer Intelligence – User behavior patterns, popular queries, knowledge gaps
  • Conversation analytics – Full transcripts, resolution rates, common questions
  • Export capabilities – API export to BI tools and data warehouses
Support & Ecosystem
  • Founding Team – Ex-Uber engineers; CEO led 4M+ interactions/month at Uber
  • Backed By – Y Combinator S22 ($125K), Matrix Partners, angels from Uber/Intercom/Softbank
  • Customers – HackerRank, Qogita, Column Tax, Bitdefender, Duolingo, Meesho, TrainingPeaks
  • Implementation – 60-day program; Enterprise gets dedicated AI engineers, 24/7 Slack
  • Email Support – support@lindy.ai, security@lindy.ai, privacy@lindy.ai
  • Slack + Forum – community.lindy.ai for peer support
  • 100+ Templates – Pre-built workflow automation scenarios
  • ⚠️ Support Inconsistency – Mixed reviews on responsiveness for lower tiers
  • Comprehensive docs – Tutorials, cookbooks, API references
  • Email + in-app support – Under 24hr response time
  • Premium support – Dedicated account managers for Premium/Enterprise
  • Open-source SDK – Python SDK, Postman, GitHub examples
  • 5,000+ Zapier apps – CRMs, e-commerce, marketing integrations
Additional Considerations
  • RAGless Positioning – Criticizes RAG as "search engines" claiming "will become obsolete"
  • Action-Taking Focus – Actions vs. information ("Done! Refund processed" vs. "Find details here")
  • Target Customer – Enterprise B2C high-volume (fintech, e-commerce, healthcare)
  • vs. Intercom Fin – Claims 95%+ accuracy vs. ~80%; platform agnostic
  • ⚠️ Less Suitable For – General Q&A, content generation, standalone chatbots
N/A
  • Time-to-value – 2-minute deployment vs weeks with DIY
  • Always current – Auto-updates to latest GPT models
  • Proven scale – 6,000+ organizations, millions of queries
  • Multi-LLM – OpenAI + Claude reduces vendor lock-in
No- Code Interface & Usability
  • ✅ Time to Go Live – "2 minutes" setup, <1 week full integration, 1-2 weeks Enterprise
  • No-Code Deployment – Widget (JS snippet), Search Bar, Standalone, native helpdesk one-click, Chrome Extension
  • Admin Dashboard – Agent creation, Knowledge Hub (Notion/Confluence/Drive), Prompt Configurator (escalation, guardrails)
  • Pre-Built Templates – E-commerce, fintech, SaaS onboarding workflows
  • ✅ 4.9/5 G2 Rating – 109+ reviews validate ease of use
  • Agent Builder – Natural language prompts create complex agents
  • Setup Speed – 30 seconds vs 15-60 minutes with Zapier/Make
  • Drag-Drop Builder – Visual workflow construction, zero coding
  • 2-minute deployment – Fastest time-to-value in the industry
  • Wizard interface – Step-by-step with visual previews
  • Drag-and-drop – Upload files, paste URLs, connect cloud storage
  • In-browser testing – Test before deploying to production
  • Zero learning curve – Productive on day one
Competitive Positioning
  • Market Position – Agentic AI for customer support; Sophie's 5-layer + RAGless claiming 97-98% accuracy
  • Key Competitors – Intercom Fin, Zendesk Answer Bot, Ada, Ultimate.ai, traditional RAG chatbots
  • ✅ Competitive Advantages – 97-98% accuracy vs. ~80%, 20+ native integrations, RAGless, 100+ languages, Zero-Pay Guarantee
  • Best Value For – Enterprises prioritizing accuracy, action-taking AI, regulated industries (fintech, healthcare)
  • ✅ Primary Advantage – 4.9/5 G2 usability with 5,000+ integrations
  • Financial Validation – $5.1M revenue, $50M+ funding (Menlo, Battery, Coatue)
  • Claude Sonnet 4.5 Default – Drove 10x customer growth
  • ⚠️ Pricing Unpredictability – Credit-based model most common complaint
  • Market position – Leading RAG platform balancing enterprise accuracy with no-code usability. Trusted by 6,000+ orgs including Adobe, MIT, Dropbox.
  • Key differentiators – #1 benchmarked accuracy • 1,400+ formats • Full white-labeling included • Flat-rate pricing
  • vs OpenAI – 10% lower hallucination, 13% higher accuracy, 34% faster
  • vs Botsonic/Chatbase – More file formats, source citations, no hidden costs
  • vs LangChain – Production-ready in 2 min vs weeks of development
A I Models
  • Starter (Free) – GPT-4o mini only (~50 questions/month)
  • Growth – GPT-4o mini + Claude, 1K docs, unlimited users
  • Enterprise – GPT-4o + Multi-layer automatic routing per query part
  • ✅ Target Accuracy – 97-98% claim with human-in-the-loop customization
  • ⚠️ No Manual Switching – Plan-based model selection only
  • Default: Claude Sonnet 4.5 – 'Almost no one overrides' per Anthropic
  • Claude Family – Sonnet 4.5, 3.7, Haiku 3.5 (200K context)
  • OpenAI – GPT-5, GPT-4o, GPT-4 Turbo, o3, o1
  • Google – Gemini 2.5 Pro, 2.5 Flash, 2.0 Flash
  • OpenAI – GPT-5.1 (Optimal/Smart), GPT-4 series
  • Anthropic – Claude 4.5 Opus/Sonnet (Enterprise)
  • Auto-routing – Intelligent model selection for cost/performance
  • Managed – No API keys or fine-tuning required
R A G Capabilities
  • RAGless Architecture – Query-writing AI; "no embeddings, no hallucinations" with precise attribution
  • 6-Mechanism Prevention – LLM filtering, confidence gating, guardrails, deterministic skill modules
  • Real-time Knowledge – Content used immediately after ingestion without retraining
  • Chat2KB (Growth/Enterprise) – Auto-extracts Q&A with MECE classification, conflict resolution
  • ✅ Customer Results – Column Tax (94%, 98% resolved), Qogita (90%, 121% SLA)
  • Hybrid Search – Semantic + keyword with Fuzziness slider (0-100)
  • Document Processing – PDF, DOCX, XLSX, CSV, TXT, HTML (20MB)
  • Cloud Integration – Auto 24-hour sync (Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint)
  • ⚠️ Black Box – Vector database, embedding models undisclosed
  • ⚠️ NO Developer Control – Cannot customize retrieval parameters
  • GPT-4 + RAG – Outperforms OpenAI in independent benchmarks
  • Anti-hallucination – Responses grounded in your content only
  • Automatic citations – Clickable source links in every response
  • Sub-second latency – Optimized vector search and caching
  • Scale to 300M words – No performance degradation at scale
Use Cases
  • ✅ Enterprise B2C Support – High-volume fintech, e-commerce, healthcare (80% resolution, 97-98% accuracy)
  • ✅ Action-Taking AI – Autonomous refunds, updates, CRM sync (Salesforce, Stripe, Shopify)
  • ✅ Helpdesk Integration – 20+ native platforms (Zendesk, Intercom, Salesforce, Front) without Zapier
  • ✅ PII-Sensitive Industries – Auto-masking SSN, passport, license, credit cards with PII Shield
  • ⚠️ NOT Suitable For – General Q&A, content generation, no existing helpdesk
  • Sales Automation – Lead qualification, scoring, enrichment, CRM syncing
  • Customer Support – Email triage, routing, FAQ, escalation
  • Voice Agents (Gaia) – 30+ language phone automation with call transfer
  • ⚠️ NOT Ideal For – Developers needing RAG APIs, EU residency
  • Customer support – 24/7 AI handling common queries with citations
  • Internal knowledge – HR policies, onboarding, technical docs
  • Sales enablement – Product info, lead qualification, education
  • Documentation – Help centers, FAQs with auto-crawling
  • E-commerce – Product recommendations, order assistance
Security & Compliance
  • ✅ SOC 2 Type II – Zero audit findings per Sprinto
  • ✅ ISO 27001 & 42001 – Information security + AI governance
  • ✅ GDPR Compliant – Full data subject rights, EU data residency
  • ⚠️ HIPAA Conflicting – Marketing claims vs. case study "next up" (verify)
  • ⚠️ PCI DSS – Claimed but not on official security page (verify)
  • "No Training on Data" – OpenAI DPA; PII Shield; AES-256, TLS 1.3
  • SOC 2 Type II + HIPAA with BAA – Independently audited
  • GDPR + PIPEDA + CCPA – Multi-region privacy compliance
  • AES-256 + TLS 1.2+ – Encryption at rest and in transit
  • ⚠️ NO ISO 27001 – May limit enterprise procurement
  • SOC 2 Type II + GDPR – Regular third-party audits, full EU compliance
  • 256-bit AES encryption – Data at rest; SSL/TLS in transit
  • SSO + 2FA + RBAC – Enterprise access controls with role-based permissions
  • Data isolation – Never trains on customer data
  • Domain allowlisting – Restrict chatbot to approved domains
Pricing & Plans
  • ⚠️ Pricing NOT Publicly Disclosed – Requires sales contact
  • Starter (Free) – GPT-4o mini, ~50 questions/month, ~50 docs, 2 bots
  • Growth (est. $999/mo) – GPT-4o mini/Claude, 1K docs, unlimited users, SOC 2, RBAC, Chat2KB
  • Enterprise (Custom) – GPT-4o, Multi-layer models, unlimited docs, AI Actions, white-glove onboarding
  • ✅ Zero-Pay Guarantee – Only pay if >80% accuracy met (unique risk mitigation)
  • Free: $0 – 400 credits, 1M chars, 1-day logs
  • Pro: $49.99 – 5K credits, 20M chars, phone calls
  • Business: $199.99-$299.99 – 20K-30K credits, 50M chars, branding
  • ⚠️ PRIMARY COMPLAINT – Unpredictable credit consumption difficult to budget
  • Standard: $99/mo – 10 chatbots, 60M words, 5K items/bot
  • Premium: $449/mo – 100 chatbots, 300M words, 20K items/bot
  • Enterprise: Custom – SSO, dedicated support, custom SLAs
  • 7-day free trial – Full Standard access, no charges
  • Flat-rate pricing – No per-query charges, no hidden costs
Support & Documentation
  • Founding Team – Ex-Uber engineers; CEO led 4M+ interactions/month; Y Combinator S22, Matrix Partners
  • Customers – HackerRank, Qogita, Column Tax, Bitdefender, Duolingo, Meesho
  • 60-Day Implementation – Discovery → Deployment → Optimization → Production with dedicated managers
  • Enterprise Support – Dedicated AI engineers, CSMs, 24/7 Slack channels
  • ⚠️ Documentation Quality – 3/5 completeness, 2/5 error handling, 1/5 rate limits; NO SDKs
  • Lindy Academy – Step-by-step tutorials for business users
  • 100+ Templates – Pre-built workflows for common scenarios
  • Slack + Forum – community.lindy.ai for peer support
  • ⚠️ NO Developer Docs – No API reference or technical architecture
  • Documentation hub – Docs, tutorials, API references
  • Support channels – Email, in-app chat, dedicated managers (Premium+)
  • Open-source – Python SDK, Postman, GitHub examples
  • Community – User community + 5,000 Zapier integrations
Limitations & Considerations
  • ⚠️ Pricing Opacity – No public pricing creates evaluation friction
  • ⚠️ HIPAA & PCI DSS Unverified – Conflicting claims require verification
  • ⚠️ Documentation Limitations – Basic API docs (3/5, 2/5, 1/5), no SDKs
  • ⚠️ Small Team (14 employees) – Limited capacity vs. enterprise competitors
  • ⚠️ Platform Lock-In – Requires existing helpdesk (Zendesk/Intercom/Salesforce)
  • ✅ Best For – Enterprise B2C high-volume prioritizing 97-98% accuracy, 60-day commitment
  • NO Public REST API – Cannot manage agents programmatically
  • Black Box RAG – Vector database, embeddings undisclosed
  • Search Constraint – Fuzziness <100 limits to 1,500 files
  • Credit Unpredictability – Most common user complaint about costs
  • ⚠️ Platform Mismatch – Workflow automation vs RAG comparison misleading
  • Managed service – Less control over RAG pipeline vs build-your-own
  • Model selection – OpenAI + Anthropic only; no Cohere, AI21, open-source
  • Real-time data – Requires re-indexing; not ideal for live inventory/prices
  • Enterprise features – Custom SSO only on Enterprise plan
Core Agent Features
  • Sophie AI Agent – Fully autonomous resolving 80% of tickets end-to-end without human intervention
  • 5-Layer Execution – Safety Guardrails (40+ filters, PII), LLM Supervisor, Skills, Feedback, Traceability
  • Multi-Layer Architecture (Enterprise) – Automatic routing to best LLM per query part; specialized agents
  • Action-Taking – Autonomous refunds, updates, CRM sync (Salesforce, Stripe, Shopify)
  • ✅ 100+ Languages – Automatic translation with locale-based routing
  • Agent Autonomy Focus – Task execution vs conversational chatbot
  • Multi-Lingual – 30+ (voice), 50+ (transcription), 85+ (text)
  • ✅ Lead Capture – Real-time qualification, CRM sync (70% higher conversion claimed)
  • Agent Evals – Benchmarking with regression prevention
  • Custom AI Agents – Autonomous GPT-4/Claude agents for business tasks
  • Multi-Agent Systems – Specialized agents for support, sales, knowledge
  • Memory & Context – Persistent conversation history across sessions
  • Tool Integration – Webhooks + 5,000 Zapier apps for automation
  • Continuous Learning – Auto re-indexing without manual retraining
R A G-as-a- Service Assessment
  • Platform Type – AGENTIC AI CUSTOMER SUPPORT with RAGless architecture, NOT traditional RAG-as-a-Service
  • Architectural Approach – Query-writing AI; "no embeddings, no hallucinations" with deterministic results
  • Sophie's 5-Layer Framework – 97-98% accuracy vs. ~80% competitors; Zero-Pay Guarantee
  • ⚠️ Developer Experience – Basic REST API (v2), NO SDKs, docs (3/5, 2/5, 1/5)
  • No-Code Capabilities – "2 minutes" setup, 20+ native helpdesk integrations, "Day 1 Ready-to-Use"
  • ⚠️ NOT A RAG PLATFORM – Explicitly positions AGAINST traditional RAG; fundamentally different
  • ⚠️ NOT Suitable For – General Q&A, content generation, no helpdesk, programmatic RAG API needs
  • ⚠️ NOT a RAG Platform – Workflow automation for business users vs developers
  • Black-Box RAG – Hybrid search with no exposed retrieval controls
  • NO API, SDKs, CLI – No programmatic access for developers
  • Platform type – TRUE RAG-AS-A-SERVICE with managed infrastructure
  • API-first – REST API, Python SDK, OpenAI compatibility, MCP Server
  • No-code option – 2-minute wizard deployment for non-developers
  • Hybrid positioning – Serves both dev teams (APIs) and business users (no-code)
  • Enterprise ready – SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, WCAG 2.0, flat-rate pricing
Autopilot & Computer Use ( Core Differentiator)
N/A
  • Unique Capability – AI agents operate cloud-based virtual computers
  • No API Required – Interact with any website/application through computer vision
  • E2B Sandboxes – Secure Python/JavaScript execution (~150ms startup)
  • ✅ Market Differentiation – Computer Use unique among no-code automation platforms
N/A
Multi- Agent Collaboration
N/A
  • Societies of Lindies – Multiple specialized agents with delegation rules
  • Context Preservation – Full conversation history passed between agents
  • Use Cases – Sales (SDR → AE → CS), Support (Triage → Technical → Escalation)
  • Learning Shared – Feedback across agent society for collective improvement
N/A
Lead Capture & Conversion
N/A
  • Real-Time Qualification – AI evaluates lead quality during conversation
  • Enrichment – Firmographic data, UTM attribution, validation
  • Auto CRM Sync – Qualified leads flow to Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho
  • ✅ 70% Higher Conversion – Claimed vs traditional forms (vendor claim)
N/A

Ready to experience the CustomGPT difference?

Start Free Trial →

Final Thoughts

Final Verdict: Fini AI vs Lindy.ai

After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both Fini AI and Lindy.ai are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.

When to Choose Fini AI

  • You value industry-leading 97-98% accuracy claim backed by customer testimonials
  • True action-taking capabilities - executes refunds, KYC, account updates beyond Q&A
  • RAGless architecture eliminates hallucinations with precise source attribution

Best For: Industry-leading 97-98% accuracy claim backed by customer testimonials

When to Choose Lindy.ai

  • You value exceptional no-code usability: 4.9/5 g2 rating, 30-second setup vs 15-60 min with zapier/make
  • Massive integration ecosystem: 5,000+ apps via Pipedream Connect with 2,500+ pre-built actions
  • Claude Sonnet 4.5 default drives 10x customer growth - best-in-class language understanding

Best For: Exceptional no-code usability: 4.9/5 G2 rating, 30-second setup vs 15-60 min with Zapier/Make

Migration & Switching Considerations

Switching between Fini AI and Lindy.ai requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.

Pricing Comparison Summary

Fini AI starts at custom pricing, while Lindy.ai begins at custom pricing. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.

Our Recommendation Process

  1. Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
  2. Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
  3. Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
  4. Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
  5. Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality

For most organizations, the decision between Fini AI and Lindy.ai comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.

📚 Next Steps

Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.

  • • Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
  • • Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
  • • Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
  • • Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements

Last updated: February 3, 2026 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.

See Also

Ready to Get Started with CustomGPT?

Join thousands of businesses that trust CustomGPT for their AI needs. Choose the path that works best for you.

Start Your Free Trial

Experience the full power of CustomGPT risk-free.

Get Started
RECOMMENDED

Request a Demo

See how CustomGPT can transform your business operations.

Get Started

Contact Sales

Get personalized guidance from our expert team.

Get Started

Why Choose CustomGPT?

97% Accuracy

Industry-leading benchmarks

5-Min Setup

Get started instantly

24/7 Support

Expert help when you need it

Enterprise Ready

Scale with confidence

Trusted by leading companies worldwide

Fortune 500Fortune 500Fortune 500Fortune 500Fortune 500Fortune 500

CustomGPT

The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.

Get API KeyDocumentationRead our benchmarks
Get in touch
Contact Us

Join the Discussion

Loading comments...

Priyansh Khodiyar's avatar

Priyansh Khodiyar

DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.

Watch: Understanding AI Tool Comparisons