In this comprehensive guide, we compare Guru and Progress Agentic RAG across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.
Overview
When choosing between Guru and Progress Agentic RAG, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose Guru if: you value permission-aware ai is unique differentiator - answers respect real-time access control
Choose Progress Agentic RAG if: you value proprietary remi v2 model (30x faster inference) addresses hallucination problem with continuous quality monitoring - differentiated capability absent from most competitors
About Guru
Guru is ai-powered knowledge management and search platform. Enterprise AI knowledge platform with permission-aware Knowledge Agents that deliver trusted, cited answers from your company's verified knowledge base across all workflows. Founded in 2015, headquartered in Philadelphia, PA, USA, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
86/100
Starting Price
$25/mo
About Progress Agentic RAG
Progress Agentic RAG is enterprise application development and deployment platform. Enterprise RAG-as-a-Service platform launched Sept 2025 following Progress Software's acquisition of Barcelona-based Nuclia. Combines SOC2/ISO 27001 security with proprietary REMi evaluation model for continuous answer quality monitoring. Built on open-source NucliaDB (710+ GitHub stars) with Python/JavaScript SDKs. Starting at $700/month. Founded in 2019 (Nuclia), acquired 2025, headquartered in Barcelona, Spain (Nuclia) / Bedford, MA, USA (Progress), the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
82/100
Starting Price
$700/mo
Key Differences at a Glance
In terms of user ratings, both platforms score similarly in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, Guru starts at a lower price point. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: Knowledge Management versus Enterprise Software. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.
⚠️ What This Comparison Covers
We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.
Detailed Feature Comparison
Guru
Progress Agentic RAG
CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
Native Knowledge Base: Guru Cards - verified knowledge articles with expert ownership and verification workflows
External Sources: Optionally approved public websites and web content
Content Types: Structured (Cards, wikis) and unstructured (documents, conversations, attachments)
Automated Syncing: API/SDK for automated Card creation, Zapier/Workato/Prismatic integrations for continuous sync
Real-Time Indexing: Knowledge updates reflected immediately in AI agent responses
Verification System: Regular verification intervals prompt content owners to review and update knowledge
Enterprise Scale: Handles millions of knowledge items across large organizations (thousands of employees)
Single Source of Truth: Centralized, verified company knowledge accessible to all AI agents
60+ Document Formats: PDF, Word (.docx), Excel, PowerPoint, plain text, email formats with automatic parsing
Multimedia Processing: Automatic speech-to-text (MP3, WAV, AIFF), video transcript extraction (MP4, etc.), OCR for scanned documents/images
Cloud Connectors: SharePoint, Confluence, OneDrive, Google Drive, Amazon S3 with direct integration
Sync Agent Desktop App: 60-minute automatic sync with content hashing to prevent redundant reindexing
Manual Upload Interface: Files, folders, web links, sitemaps, Q&A pairs via dashboard
Fast Deployment: 2-hour initial ingestion, 48-hour full deployment timeline
CRITICAL GAPS: NO Dropbox integration, NO Notion integration, NO explicit YouTube transcript extraction documented
Architecture Focus: Comprehensive knowledge retrieval vs lead conversion focus (unlike Drift)
Lets you ingest more than 1,400 file formats—PDF, DOCX, TXT, Markdown, HTML, and many more—via simple drag-and-drop or API.
Crawls entire sites through sitemaps and URLs, automatically indexing public help-desk articles, FAQs, and docs.
Turns multimedia into text on the fly: YouTube videos, podcasts, and other media are auto-transcribed with built-in OCR and speech-to-text.
View Transcription Guide
Connects to Google Drive, SharePoint, Notion, Confluence, HubSpot, and more through API connectors or Zapier.
See Zapier Connectors
Supports both manual uploads and auto-sync retraining, so your knowledge base always stays up to date.
Integrations & Channels
Native Workplace Apps: Slack workspace bot, Microsoft Teams bot, browser extension for any web app
AI Tool Integration: ChatGPT, Claude, GitHub Copilot via MCP (Model Context Protocol) Server
Business Apps: Salesforce knowledge integration, Zendesk support integration, intranet portals
Automation Platforms: Zapier (1,000+ apps), Workato, Prismatic for custom workflows
Developer Access: REST API, Python SDK, webhooks for event-driven integrations
Mobile Apps: iOS and Android native apps for on-the-go knowledge access
Embedded Knowledge: Widgets for internal portals, API-driven custom chat interfaces
MCP Server: Universal connector for any AI tool to access Guru's permission-aware knowledge layer
Focus: Strong internal channel support (Slack/Teams), less emphasis on public consumer channels (WhatsApp, Telegram)
Conversational AI: Multi-turn dialogue with context retention - feels like talking to a knowledgeable co-worker
Multi-Lingual: Content in all languages supported, instant translation to 50+ languages (UI English-only)
Grounded Answers: All responses backed by verified company knowledge with automatic citations
Customizable Knowledge Agents: Create and deploy specialized AI agents for any team or project tailoring knowledge sources, tone, and focus to provide highly relevant role-specific insights that improve over time
Research Mode: Complex queries generate structured multi-source reports with detailed analysis
Permission-Aware: Answers automatically tailored to user's role and access permissions
Content Assist Features: Actions include "Fix grammar," "Summarize," "Make more concise," or custom prompts to match team tone or formatting needs
Admin Customization Controls: Admins can toggle specific actions on or off and create custom assist actions for different user groups ensuring alignment across teams
Conversation Logging: Complete audit trail via AI Agent Center - every question, answer, and source tracked
Analytics Dashboard: Usage stats, deflection rates, time saved, trending questions, knowledge gap identification
Human Escalation: Seamless handoff to subject-matter experts when AI cannot answer, convert queries to Card requests
Internal Focus: Optimized for employee knowledge access vs. external customer engagement features (lead capture not core)
AI Search & Generative Answers: Semantic search and Q&A across knowledge bases with trusted, source-linked answers
Multi-Turn Conversations: Context-aware dialogue with conversation history maintained for follow-up questions
Source Citations: Every answer includes citations linking to source documents for verification and transparency
Auto-Summarization: Automatic summarization of long documents for quick understanding
Entity Recognition: AI classification and entity extraction enriching corpus for better Q&A
Answer-Only Mode: Widget configuration for concise answers vs detailed responses based on use case
Multilingual Support: Nuclia multilingual embedding model handles multiple languages out-of-box
MISSING FEATURES: NO lead capture, NO human handoff/escalation workflows, NO chat history export for users
Reduces hallucinations by grounding replies in your data and adding source citations for transparency.
Benchmark Details
Handles multi-turn, context-aware chats with persistent history and solid conversation management.
Speaks 90+ languages, making global rollouts straightforward.
Includes extras like lead capture (email collection) and smooth handoff to a human when needed.
Customization & Branding
Custom Agents: Each Knowledge Agent has unique name, avatar, scope, and purpose (IT, HR, Sales, Marketing, Product)
Prompt Configuration: Custom instructions and system messages per agent to shape behavior and response style
Permission Scoping: Agents automatically respect user roles - managers see more detail than general employees
Department Specialization: Create specialized agents for different teams using relevant knowledge Collections
Portal Branding: Guru Pages/Portal can include company logos, colors, custom styling for internal knowledge sites
Limited White-Labeling: Guru branding typically present in web app and extension (internal tool focus, not external)
Core Architecture: Serverless RAG infrastructure with automatic embedding generation, vector search optimization, and LLM orchestration fully managed behind API endpoints
API-First Design: Comprehensive REST API with well-documented endpoints for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data (1,400+ formats), and querying chat
API Documentation
Developer Experience: Open-source Python SDK (customgpt-client), Postman collections, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, and extensive cookbooks for rapid integration
No-Code Alternative: Wizard-style web dashboard enables non-developers to upload content, brand widgets, and deploy chatbots without touching code
Hybrid Target Market: Serves both developer teams wanting robust APIs AND business users seeking no-code RAG deployment - unique positioning vs pure API platforms (Cohere) or pure no-code tools (Jotform)
RAG Technology Leadership: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, proprietary anti-hallucination mechanisms, and citation-backed responses
Benchmark Details
Deployment Flexibility: Cloud-hosted SaaS with auto-scaling, API integrations, embedded chat widgets, ChatGPT Plugin support, and hosted MCP Server for Claude/Cursor/ChatGPT
Enterprise Readiness: SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling, domain allowlisting, RBAC with 2FA/SSO, and flat-rate pricing without per-query charges
Use Case Fit: Ideal for organizations needing both rapid no-code deployment AND robust API capabilities, teams handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), and businesses requiring production-ready RAG without building ML infrastructure from scratch
Competitive Positioning: Bridges the gap between developer-first platforms (Cohere, Deepset) requiring heavy coding and no-code chatbot builders (Jotform, Kommunicate) lacking API depth - offers best of both worlds
Competitive Positioning
Primary Advantage: Permission-aware AI with real-time access control - unique in market
Knowledge Foundation: 10+ years enterprise KM expertise ensures verified, trustworthy knowledge base
Enterprise Focus: Built for large organizations with complex permission structures and compliance needs
Integration Breadth: MCP Server enables universal AI tool connectivity without custom RAG
Primary Challenge: Per-user pricing can be expensive for very large deployments vs. query-based models
Internal Focus: Optimized for internal knowledge vs. external customer-facing chatbots
Market Position: Premium enterprise knowledge platform with AI vs. pure-play RAG chatbot services
Use Case Fit: Ideal for enterprises prioritizing trust, governance, and internal knowledge access
Proven Scale: Handles thousands of users and millions of knowledge items in production deployments
Market Position: Enterprise RAG-as-a-Service with genuine no-code accessibility + developer-first API design (dual-track appeal)
vs. CustomGPT: Similar RAG-as-a-Service category, Progress emphasizes REMi quality monitoring + open-source foundation differentiation
vs. Drift/Yellow.ai: TRUE RAG platform vs conversational marketing/sales engagement platforms (fundamentally different categories)
vs. Lindy.ai: Full API/SDK access vs NO public API (Progress developer-friendly, Lindy no-code only)
Integration Gaps: NO native messaging channels (Slack/WhatsApp/Teams) vs omnichannel competitors - requires custom development
HIPAA Gap: No documented certification creates healthcare trust gap vs compliant competitors (Drift has HIPAA)
Recent Acquisition Risk: June 2025 Progress purchase means platform still maturing under new ownership with potential direction changes
Progress Ecosystem Advantage: Integration with OpenEdge, Sitefinity CMS provides distribution channels unavailable to standalone competitors
Market position: Leading all-in-one RAG platform balancing enterprise-grade accuracy with developer-friendly APIs and no-code usability for rapid deployment
Target customers: Mid-market to enterprise organizations needing production-ready AI assistants, development teams wanting robust APIs without building RAG infrastructure, and businesses requiring 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription (YouTube, podcasts)
Key competitors: OpenAI Assistants API, Botsonic, Chatbase.co, Azure AI, and custom RAG implementations using LangChain
Competitive advantages: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling included, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, hosted MCP Server support (Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT), generous data limits (60M words Standard, 300M Premium), and flat monthly pricing without per-query charges
Pricing advantage: Transparent flat-rate pricing at $99/month (Standard) and $449/month (Premium) with generous included limits; no hidden costs for API access, branding removal, or basic features; best value for teams needing both no-code dashboard and developer APIs in one platform
Use case fit: Ideal for businesses needing both rapid no-code deployment and robust API capabilities, organizations handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), teams requiring white-label chatbots with source citations for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects, and companies wanting all-in-one RAG without managing ML infrastructure
A I Models
Abstracted Model Architecture: LLM selection handled internally - likely OpenAI GPT (GPT-3.5/GPT-4) by default for standard operations
No User-Facing Selection: No UI toggle for model choice - platform optimized for trust and simplicity over technical control
LLM-Agnostic Design: Architecture designed to work with different models providing enterprise flexibility for future model changes
Private Model Options: Enterprise can opt for dedicated private AI model instance (e.g., Azure OpenAI in customer tenant) for data sovereignty
Zero Data Retention: Third-party LLM endpoints configured to never store or train on customer data - critical privacy guarantee
Automatic Optimization: System may use different models for simple FAQ responses vs. complex Research Mode queries for cost/quality balance
Security-First Selection: Model choice prioritizes compliance, data sovereignty, and zero leakage guarantees over raw performance metrics
Quality Assurance Layer: All answers cited and permission-aware regardless of underlying model - trust layer above LLM capabilities
Anthropic Models: Claude 3.7, Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 for safety-focused, high-quality generation
OpenAI Models: ChatGPT 4o, 4o mini for industry-leading language capabilities
Google Models: Gemini Flash 2.5, PaLM2 for multimodal and search-optimized tasks
Meta Models: Llama 3.2 for open-source flexibility and customization
Microsoft/Azure: Mistral Large 2 for enterprise deployments with Azure integration
Cohere Models: Command-R suite for retrieval-optimized generation
Nuclia Private GenAI: 100% data isolation mode for maximum security without third-party LLM exposure
Model Switching: Change providers without architectural changes via Prompt Lab for side-by-side testing
Dynamic Knowledge Management: Continuous updates, gap identification, and automatic documentation generation
Developer RAG Backend: API-first infrastructure for building custom AI applications with Prompt Lab experimentation
Customer support automation: AI assistants handling common queries, reducing support ticket volume, providing 24/7 instant responses with source citations
Internal knowledge management: Employee self-service for HR policies, technical documentation, onboarding materials, company procedures across 1,400+ file formats
Sales enablement: Product information chatbots, lead qualification, customer education with white-labeled widgets on websites and apps
Documentation assistance: Technical docs, help centers, FAQs with automatic website crawling and sitemap indexing
Educational platforms: Course materials, research assistance, student support with multimedia content (YouTube transcriptions, podcasts)
Healthcare information: Patient education, medical knowledge bases (SOC 2 Type II compliant for sensitive data)
Scaling Consideration: Token-based consumption pricing requires careful usage forecasting for budget predictability beyond included tier
Best Value For: Organizations wanting to control costs through usage optimization vs fixed seat-based or per-project pricing models
Standard Plan: $99/month or $89/month annual - 10 custom chatbots, 5,000 items per chatbot, 60 million words per bot, basic helpdesk support, standard security
View Pricing
Premium Plan: $499/month or $449/month annual - 100 custom chatbots, 20,000 items per chatbot, 300 million words per bot, advanced support, enhanced security, additional customization
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing - Comprehensive AI solutions, highest security and compliance, dedicated account managers, custom SSO, token authentication, priority support with faster SLAs
Enterprise Solutions
7-Day Free Trial: Full access to Standard features without charges - available to all users
Annual billing discount: Save 10% by paying upfront annually ($89/mo Standard, $449/mo Premium)
Flat monthly rates: No per-query charges, no hidden costs for API access or white-labeling (included in all plans)
Managed infrastructure: Auto-scaling cloud infrastructure included - no additional hosting or scaling fees
Support & Documentation
Multi-Channel Support: Help Center with comprehensive guides, Community forum for peer learning, live chat for paying customers
Enterprise Support: Dedicated Customer Success Manager, priority support queues, SLA guarantees for response times
Guru University: Training programs, workshops, office hours, certification courses for user skill development
Active Community: User forum for peer learning, knowledge sharing, best practice discussions across industries
Developer Resources: Extensive API docs at developer.getguru.com, Python SDK, integration examples, developer blog
Real-Time Knowledge Updates: Always available manual retraining across all plans through browser extension and integration sync triggers
Automatic Syncing: Continuous synchronization with integrated systems (Confluence, SharePoint, Notion, Google Drive, Salesforce, Zendesk) for real-time knowledge base updates
Custom Knowledge Agents: Each agent has unique name, avatar, scope, and purpose (IT, HR, Sales, Marketing, Product) with prompt configuration to shape behavior and response style
Department Specialization: Create specialized agents for different teams using relevant knowledge Collections with permission scoping automatically respecting user roles
Permission-Aware Responses: Answers automatically tailored to user's role and access permissions - managers see more detail than general employees
Content Assist Customization: Create custom assist actions for different user groups with admin controls to toggle specific actions on or off ensuring alignment across teams
Verification Workflows: Collaborative knowledge management where Card Owners receive verification reminders, experts can trigger out-of-cycle reviews, and verification intervals are configurable
Knowledge Attribution: Every Card has designated Owner (subject-matter expert), last verified timestamp, trusted status indicator, audit trail of changes
LIMITATION: No programmatic personality management - agent configuration dashboard-only, cannot modify per-user or via API (no /agents endpoint for creating/updating agents)
LIMITATION: Model Abstraction - no user control over LLM selection optimized for simplicity but reduces flexibility for technical users
30+ RAG Optimization Parameters: Fine-grained control over retrieval behavior
Custom Chunking Strategies: Configurable text segmentation for optimal context windows
Context Size Configuration: Adjust context sent to LLMs based on use case
Hybrid Search Weighting: Balance keyword vs semantic search relevance
Retrieval Agent Autonomy: Automatically select optimal strategies per query characteristics
Embedding Model Flexibility: Switch per Knowledge Box (Nuclia multilingual + OpenAI options)
Prompt Lab Experimentation: Test configurations with actual data before production deployment
Lets you add, remove, or tweak content on the fly—automatic re-indexing keeps everything current.
Shapes agent behavior through system prompts and sample Q&A, ensuring a consistent voice and focus.
Learn How to Update Sources
Supports multiple agents per account, so different teams can have their own bots.
Balances hands-on control with smart defaults—no deep ML expertise required to get tailored behavior.
Additional Considerations
Content Maintenance Requirements: Platform value depends on organizational discipline in refreshing knowledge base regularly - requires disciplined maintenance where teams must actively verify cards and keep ownership clear
Search Limitations: Guru's search struggles when knowledge isn't perfectly documented and tagged within its system of Cards - if answer exists only in Slack thread or past conversation, Guru's search won't find it leading to "no results found" dead ends
Enterprise-Specific Limitations: Version history for published cards but not for drafts making collaborative edits hard to track or revert; editor cannot create step-by-step guides or decision trees requiring employees to scan long text
UI Performance Concerns: UI becomes laggy when Knowledge base and team grows - performance degradation at scale
Initial Setup Complexity: New users may find UI slightly complex particularly when managing large collections or reorganizing knowledge across departments - initial setup defining collections, permissions, and verification rules can take time especially for companies with many departments
Pricing Consideration: Per-user seat-based model can be expensive for very large deployments (1,000+ users) vs query-based alternatives - pricing structure requires consideration especially for smaller businesses
Limited Customization: User interface while generally user-friendly may lack flexibility in terms of customization potentially limiting company's ability to fully brand experience or tailor to specific visual preferences
Integration Gaps: While Guru integrates with popular tools like Slack users desire more native integrations with other platforms to further streamline workflows and data synchronization
No Built-In Customer Portal: Guru offers no built-in portal for customers - publishing content online needs extra API work
Internal Focus Trade-off: Platform designed for internal teams - NOT optimized for external customer support chatbots, public-facing agents, or lead capture capabilities
Best For: Companies prioritizing internal knowledge management with verified content workflows and distributed expertise capture
NOT Ideal For: External customer support chatbots, public-facing conversational AI, organizations without verification workflow culture, teams needing deep LLM customization
Recent Acquisition (June 2025): Progress Software acquired Nuclia for $50M - platform transitioning under new ownership with potential strategic direction changes
Genuine No-Code + Developer Appeal: Dual-track value proposition - non-technical teams use dashboard, developers leverage API/SDKs for custom builds
REMi Quality Differentiator: Proprietary continuous evaluation model (30x faster in v2) addresses hallucination problem absent from most RAG competitors
Open-Source Trust Factor: NucliaDB (710+ GitHub stars, AGPLv3) provides code transparency vs black-box platforms - security audits possible
Multimodal Strength: OCR for images, speech-to-text for audio/video creates comprehensive searchable corpus beyond text-only competitors
Enterprise RAG Focus: Platform optimized for knowledge retrieval and semantic search - not conversational marketing/sales engagement like Drift/Yellow.ai
Progress Ecosystem Integration: OpenEdge database connector, Sitefinity CMS integration provides distribution channels unavailable to standalone platforms
Documentation Fragmentation: Dual portals (docs.rag.progress.cloud + legacy docs.nuclia.dev) during transition may cause developer confusion
Competitive Pricing Entry: $700/month Fly tier undercuts enterprise RAG alternatives while providing genuine capabilities vs limited free tiers
Best For: Organizations wanting model flexibility (7 providers), multimodal indexing, open-source transparency, and developer API access without managing infrastructure
Slashes engineering overhead with an all-in-one RAG platform—no in-house ML team required.
Gets you to value quickly: launch a functional AI assistant in minutes.
Stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements, so you’re always on the latest tech.
Balances top-tier accuracy with ease of use, perfect for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects.
Limitations & Considerations
Per-User Pricing Challenges: Seat-based model can be expensive for very large deployments (1,000+ users) vs query-based alternatives
Internal Focus Trade-off: Optimized for internal knowledge access vs external customer-facing chatbot capabilities (lead capture not core)
Limited White-Labeling: Guru branding typically present in web app and extension - internal tool focus vs external customer experiences
English-Only UI: Content supports all languages with translation to 50+, but user interface remains English-only for administrators
Model Abstraction: No user control over LLM selection - optimized for simplicity but reduces flexibility for technical users
AI Credit Management: Usage limits require monitoring and management - organizations may need to purchase additional credits
Enterprise Requirements: Advanced features (IP whitelisting, SSO, SCIM, private models) require Enterprise plan with custom pricing
Setup Complexity: Initial configuration of integrations, permissions, and verification workflows requires thoughtful planning
Change Management: Successful deployment requires organizational adoption of verification workflows and knowledge ownership culture
External Use Limitations: Platform designed for internal teams - not optimized for external customer support chatbots or public-facing agents
NO HIPAA Certification Documented: Healthcare organizations processing PHI must contact sales - major compliance gap vs competitors with documented HIPAA
NO Native Messaging Channels: No Slack, WhatsApp, Telegram, or Microsoft Teams integrations - requires custom API-based development
Documentation Fragmentation: Dual portals (docs.rag.progress.cloud + docs.nuclia.dev) during Progress acquisition transition may cause confusion
Recent Acquisition Risk: June 2025 Progress purchase means platform still maturing under new ownership with potential direction changes
Scalability Concerns: Multiple problems limit scalability - hard to scale nodes up/down, write operations affect concurrent search performance
NO Dropbox Integration: Missing Dropbox connector vs competitors - limits cloud storage sync options
NO Notion Integration: Missing Notion connector - gap for knowledge management workflows
NO YouTube Transcript Extraction: Not explicitly documented vs competitors with video indexing features
Missing Features: NO lead capture, NO human handoff/escalation workflows, NO proactive alerting (monitoring exists, alerting undocumented)
Learning Curve: 30+ RAG parameters and Prompt Lab may feel technical for non-developer teams despite no-code dashboard
Best For: Development teams and technical users - powerful for experts but may overwhelm business users wanting simple deployment
Managed service approach: Less control over underlying RAG pipeline configuration compared to build-your-own solutions like LangChain
Vendor lock-in: Proprietary platform - migration to alternative RAG solutions requires rebuilding knowledge bases
Model selection: Limited to OpenAI (GPT-5.1 and 4 series) and Anthropic (Claude, opus and sonnet 4.5) - no support for other LLM providers (Cohere, AI21, open-source models)
Pricing at scale: Flat-rate pricing may become expensive for very high-volume use cases (millions of queries/month) compared to pay-per-use models
Customization limits: While highly configurable, some advanced RAG techniques (custom reranking, hybrid search strategies) may not be exposed
Language support: Supports 90+ languages but performance may vary for less common languages or specialized domains
Real-time data: Knowledge bases require re-indexing for updates - not ideal for real-time data requirements (stock prices, live inventory)
Enterprise features: Some advanced features (custom SSO, token authentication) only available on Enterprise plan with custom pricing
Core Agent Features
N/A
Retrieval Agents: Autonomously select optimal retrieval strategies based on query characteristics
CSS Customization: Shadow DOM architecture with cssPath attribute for advanced styling
White-Labeling: Full OEM deployment support via API-first design
MISSING FEATURES: NO lead capture, NO human handoff/escalation workflows, NO proactive alerting (monitoring exists, alerting undocumented)
Custom AI Agents: Build autonomous agents powered by GPT-4 and Claude that can perform tasks independently and make real-time decisions based on business knowledge
Decision-Support Capabilities: AI agents analyze proprietary data to provide insights, recommendations, and actionable responses specific to your business domain
Multi-Agent Systems: Deploy multiple specialized AI agents that can collaborate and optimize workflows in areas like customer support, sales, and internal knowledge management
Memory & Context Management: Agents maintain conversation history and persistent context for coherent multi-turn interactions
View Agent Documentation
Tool Integration: Agents can trigger actions, integrate with external APIs via webhooks, and connect to 5,000+ apps through Zapier for automated workflows
Hyper-Accurate Responses: Leverages advanced RAG technology and retrieval mechanisms to deliver context-aware, citation-backed responses grounded in your knowledge base
Continuous Learning: Agents improve over time through automatic re-indexing of knowledge sources and integration of new data without manual retraining
R E Mi Evaluation Model ( Core Differentiator)
N/A
Proprietary Investment: Significant R&D differentiator addressing hallucination problem - absent from most competitors
REMi v2 (Current): Llama-REMi v1 based on Llama 3.2-3B with 30x faster inference vs original Mistral implementation
Continuous Quality Monitoring: Evaluates EVERY interaction across four dimensions (0-5 scale)
Answer Relevance: Measures how directly response addresses the query
Context Relevance: Assesses quality of retrieved passages relative to question
Groundedness: Evaluates degree to which answers derive from source context (hallucination detection)
Answer Correctness: Alignment with ground truth when available (optional dimension)
Benchmark Validation: Nuclia with OpenAI embeddings achieved highest scores vs Vectara on Docmatix 1.4k dataset across answer relevance, context relevance, correctness
Real-Time Visibility: Dashboard health displays with 7-day rolling averages and performance graphs (24h to 30d)
Competitive Advantage: Most RAG platforms lack continuous quality evaluation - Progress makes this core differentiator
N/A
Open- Source Nuclia D B Foundation
N/A
GitHub Presence: 710+ stars, AGPLv3 license provides full transparency into core retrieval mechanisms
Technology Stack: Python and Rust implementation for performance and reliability
Managed Infrastructure: Progress removes operational burden while maintaining technical transparency
Four Index Types: Document Index (property filtering), Full Text (keyword/fuzzy search), Chunk/Vector (semantic similarity), Knowledge Graph (entity relationships)
Dynamic Sharding: Automatic shard creation as vectors grow with index node replication for fault tolerance
Dynamic Scaling: Automatic shard creation as vector counts grow with index node replication
Web Component Embedding: <nuclia-search-bar> and <nuclia-chat> for website integration
Multi-Region Support: Regional data residency options (EU/US) for compliance requirements
N/A
Customer Base & Case Studies
N/A
SRS Distribution (Wholesale Building Materials): "Progress Agentic RAG has fundamentally changed how we access and act on information across our organisation. Its ability to deliver fast, accurate, and verifiable insights from our unstructured data has been a game-changer for productivity and decision-making."
BrokerChooser (Financial Services): Replaced keyword search with generative AI, reporting significant conversion increases and better user experience
NAFEMS (Engineering Simulation Association): Knowledge discovery across thousands of technical publications for international membership community
Althaia Hospitals (Spain's Largest Central Catalonia Hospital): Medical protocol search supporting 5,000+ healthcare professionals
Columbia Business School: Academic knowledge discovery and research support
Barry University: Education sector deployment for institutional knowledge management
CCOO (Spain's Largest Trade Union): 1M+ members served with knowledge retrieval platform
Buff Sportswear: Commercial deployment for product and customer knowledge management
Pre-Acquisition Scale: ~20 customers across healthcare, pharmaceutical, education, public administration sectors
After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both Guru and Progress Agentic RAG are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.
When to Choose Guru
You value permission-aware ai is unique differentiator - answers respect real-time access control
Enterprise-grade security: SOC 2, GDPR, zero LLM data retention, private models
Verified knowledge base with expert verification workflows ensures accuracy
Best For: Permission-aware AI is unique differentiator - answers respect real-time access control
When to Choose Progress Agentic RAG
You value proprietary remi v2 model (30x faster inference) addresses hallucination problem with continuous quality monitoring - differentiated capability absent from most competitors
Open-source NucliaDB transparency (710+ GitHub stars) with managed infrastructure removes operational burden while maintaining technical visibility
Genuine no-code accessibility: business users (marketing, HR, legal, support) can deploy functional RAG pipelines in minutes via visual dashboard
Best For: Proprietary REMi v2 model (30x faster inference) addresses hallucination problem with continuous quality monitoring - differentiated capability absent from most competitors
Migration & Switching Considerations
Switching between Guru and Progress Agentic RAG requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.
Pricing Comparison Summary
Guru starts at $25/month, while Progress Agentic RAG begins at $700/month. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.
Our Recommendation Process
Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality
For most organizations, the decision between Guru and Progress Agentic RAG comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.
📚 Next Steps
Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.
• Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
• Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
• Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
• Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements
Last updated: December 11, 2025 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.
The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.
DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.
People Also Compare
Explore more AI tool comparisons to find the perfect solution for your needs
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...