In this comprehensive guide, we compare Progress Agentic RAG and UChat across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.
Overview
When choosing between Progress Agentic RAG and UChat, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose Progress Agentic RAG if: you value proprietary remi v2 model (30x faster inference) addresses hallucination problem with continuous quality monitoring - differentiated capability absent from most competitors
Choose UChat if: you value exceptional value - $10/month for 12+ channels vs manychat's $15/month for 4 channels
About Progress Agentic RAG
Progress Agentic RAG is enterprise application development and deployment platform. Enterprise RAG-as-a-Service platform launched Sept 2025 following Progress Software's acquisition of Barcelona-based Nuclia. Combines SOC2/ISO 27001 security with proprietary REMi evaluation model for continuous answer quality monitoring. Built on open-source NucliaDB (710+ GitHub stars) with Python/JavaScript SDKs. Starting at $700/month. Founded in 2019 (Nuclia), acquired 2025, headquartered in Barcelona, Spain (Nuclia) / Bedford, MA, USA (Progress), the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
82/100
Starting Price
$700/mo
About UChat
UChat is no-code omnichannel chatbot builder for social commerce. UChat is a no-code omnichannel chatbot platform optimized for social commerce and customer engagement across 15+ messaging channels including WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, Instagram, Telegram, and more. Built for agencies with comprehensive white-labeling at $199/month. Founded in 2018, headquartered in Australia, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
98/100
Starting Price
$10/mo
Key Differences at a Glance
In terms of user ratings, UChat in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, UChat offers more competitive entry pricing. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: Enterprise Software versus Chatbot Platform. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.
⚠️ What This Comparison Covers
We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.
Detailed Feature Comparison
Progress Agentic RAG
UChat
CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
60+ Document Formats: PDF, Word (.docx), Excel, PowerPoint, plain text, email formats with automatic parsing
Multimedia Processing: Automatic speech-to-text (MP3, WAV, AIFF), video transcript extraction (MP4, etc.), OCR for scanned documents/images
Cloud Connectors: SharePoint, Confluence, OneDrive, Google Drive, Amazon S3 with direct integration
Sync Agent Desktop App: 60-minute automatic sync with content hashing to prevent redundant reindexing
Manual Upload Interface: Files, folders, web links, sitemaps, Q&A pairs via dashboard
Fast Deployment: 2-hour initial ingestion, 48-hour full deployment timeline
CRITICAL GAPS: NO Dropbox integration, NO Notion integration, NO explicit YouTube transcript extraction documented
Architecture Focus: Comprehensive knowledge retrieval vs lead conversion focus (unlike Drift)
OpenAI Assistant API integration (not native RAG architecture)
Upload documents up to 200MB per file to OpenAI's embedding system
Supported formats: PDF, DOCX, TXT, CSV, HTML
Note: No native website crawling - content must be extracted and uploaded manually
Note: No YouTube transcript ingestion
Note: No direct Google Drive, Dropbox, or Notion integrations for knowledge sources
Cloud storage access possible via Zapier, Make, Pabbly Connect middleware (manual workflow)
Note: No auto-sync or scheduled refresh - all knowledge updates require manual file re-upload
Lets you ingest more than 1,400 file formats—PDF, DOCX, TXT, Markdown, HTML, and many more—via simple drag-and-drop or API.
Crawls entire sites through sitemaps and URLs, automatically indexing public help-desk articles, FAQs, and docs.
Turns multimedia into text on the fly: YouTube videos, podcasts, and other media are auto-transcribed with built-in OCR and speech-to-text.
View Transcription Guide
Connects to Google Drive, SharePoint, Notion, Confluence, HubSpot, and more through API connectors or Zapier.
See Zapier Connectors
Supports both manual uploads and auto-sync retraining, so your knowledge base always stays up to date.
CSS Customization: Shadow DOM architecture with cssPath attribute for advanced styling
White-Labeling: Full OEM deployment support via API-first design
MISSING FEATURES: NO lead capture, NO human handoff/escalation workflows, NO proactive alerting (monitoring exists, alerting undocumented)
AI-driven workflows: Deploy AI-driven workflows with visual drag-and-drop builder to automate sales, support, and engagement across 15+ social channels
Multi-channel deployment: WhatsApp, Instagram, Messenger and 12+ other platforms with unified management
Smart AI agents: Build and deploy smart AI agents with visual flows for no-code automation
Omnichannel messaging: Manage messaging across all channels from single platform
5,000+ app integrations: Connect with thousands of apps through native integrations and middleware (Zapier, Pabbly Connect, Make)
No coding needed: Visual interface allows both developers and business owners to enhance chatbot capabilities without programming
Core skill sets: Scheduling, data collection, and other configurable agent capabilities
AI Actions integration: Integrate AI agents into workflows through Flow Builder by selecting "AI Actions" and choosing primary AI agent
Secondary agent enrichment: Add secondary agents (Customer Support, CRM Manager) to enrich primary agent with additional functionalities
Multi-agent connectivity: Connect multiple agents using "Plus Additional AI Agents" for complex workflows
Dynamic routing: Ensures relevant responses based on user needs with context-aware conversation management
Live agent handoff: Instant transfer of complex queries to live agents when automation reaches limits
Custom AI Agents: Build autonomous agents powered by GPT-4 and Claude that can perform tasks independently and make real-time decisions based on business knowledge
Decision-Support Capabilities: AI agents analyze proprietary data to provide insights, recommendations, and actionable responses specific to your business domain
Multi-Agent Systems: Deploy multiple specialized AI agents that can collaborate and optimize workflows in areas like customer support, sales, and internal knowledge management
Memory & Context Management: Agents maintain conversation history and persistent context for coherent multi-turn interactions
View Agent Documentation
Tool Integration: Agents can trigger actions, integrate with external APIs via webhooks, and connect to 5,000+ apps through Zapier for automated workflows
Hyper-Accurate Responses: Leverages advanced RAG technology and retrieval mechanisms to deliver context-aware, citation-backed responses grounded in your knowledge base
Continuous Learning: Agents improve over time through automatic re-indexing of knowledge sources and integration of new data without manual retraining
Additional Considerations
Recent Acquisition (June 2025): Progress Software acquired Nuclia for $50M - platform transitioning under new ownership with potential strategic direction changes
Genuine No-Code + Developer Appeal: Dual-track value proposition - non-technical teams use dashboard, developers leverage API/SDKs for custom builds
REMi Quality Differentiator: Proprietary continuous evaluation model (30x faster in v2) addresses hallucination problem absent from most RAG competitors
Open-Source Trust Factor: NucliaDB (710+ GitHub stars, AGPLv3) provides code transparency vs black-box platforms - security audits possible
Multimodal Strength: OCR for images, speech-to-text for audio/video creates comprehensive searchable corpus beyond text-only competitors
Enterprise RAG Focus: Platform optimized for knowledge retrieval and semantic search - not conversational marketing/sales engagement like Drift/Yellow.ai
Progress Ecosystem Integration: OpenEdge database connector, Sitefinity CMS integration provides distribution channels unavailable to standalone platforms
Documentation Fragmentation: Dual portals (docs.rag.progress.cloud + legacy docs.nuclia.dev) during transition may cause developer confusion
Competitive Pricing Entry: $700/month Fly tier undercuts enterprise RAG alternatives while providing genuine capabilities vs limited free tiers
Best For: Organizations wanting model flexibility (7 providers), multimodal indexing, open-source transparency, and developer API access without managing infrastructure
Platform still young: Room for improvement including server resource limits that some users encounter
Asset limitations: Times when limitations on assets were forced by the group affecting flexibility
Channel integration structure: Users desire integrated omnichannel structure instead of separate channels - would reduce building time and allow interaction from single inbox regardless of channel
Current multi-channel management: Need to login to each individual channel rather than unified interface for all customer interactions
Control and management tradeoffs: Less control over system performance, updates, and configurations compared to self-hosted solutions
Internet connectivity dependency: Heavily relies on internet connectivity - may experience unpredictable quality of service (QoS) especially for voice and video
BYOC integration challenges: Bring-your-own-carrier (BYOC) approach may encounter integration or configuration challenges when connecting existing telephony services
Multi-vendor troubleshooting: Troubleshooting across multiple vendors can complicate support and increase time to resolution
Integration compatibility: Not all solutions seamlessly integrate particularly during collaborative sessions like virtual meetings
Security alignment: Need to align provider practices with internal security policies for voice and video application vulnerabilities
Slashes engineering overhead with an all-in-one RAG platform—no in-house ML team required.
Gets you to value quickly: launch a functional AI assistant in minutes.
Stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements, so you’re always on the latest tech.
Balances top-tier accuracy with ease of use, perfect for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects.
Customization & Branding
Prompt Lab: Test LLMs side-by-side using actual customer data with real-time comparison
Rapid Deployment: Progress explicitly markets minutes-to-production capability for business users
Shadow DOM Architecture: Advanced users can apply CSS styling via cssPath attribute for customization
Visual builder: Drag-and-drop Visual flow builder with no coding required; multi-agent orchestration with role-based task routing; conversation context handoff between agents without technical implementation
Setup complexity: Script tag website embedding with domain verification; build once, launch on 8 channels simultaneously with unified inbox; 160+ template library (vs ManyChat's 35 templates) reduces time-to-deployment
Learning curve: UChat Academy 4-module structured training program with certifications (Certified Chatbot Builder, Mini App Builder Certification); specialized courses for Dialogflow, WooCommerce, Shopify, WhatsApp commerce; 700+ YouTube tutorial videos for visual learning
Pre-built templates: 160+ template library covering e-commerce, customer service, lead generation, appointment scheduling, and industry-specific scenarios; significantly more comprehensive than competitors (ManyChat: 35 templates)
No-code workflows: JavaScript function nodes for custom code execution within flows (documentation via video tutorials); 6 variable types (text, number, boolean, date, datetime, JSON); Mathematical formulas (abs(), ceil(), floor(), log(), pow(), sqrt(), trigonometric functions); HTTP request nodes support all methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH, HEAD, OPTIONS) with JSON/form/multipart/raw body formats
User experience: 4.9/5 overall Capterra rating (72 reviews) with 4.8/5 customer service rating; Facebook community 75,000+ members (claimed) demonstrates active user engagement; Partner-exclusive Discord channel for advanced users
Target audience: Optimized for agencies and resellers with Partner plan ($199/month) offering full white-labeling, custom pricing, 100% profit retention; Mini-App ecosystem (119 third-party apps) extends functionality without technical development
STRENGTH: Best value in market at $10/month for 12+ omnichannel deployment vs ManyChat $15/month for 4 channels, Chatfuel $49.49/month WhatsApp only
Offers a wizard-style web dashboard so non-devs can upload content, brand the widget, and monitor performance.
Supports drag-and-drop uploads, visual theme editing, and in-browser chatbot testing.
User Experience Review
Uses role-based access so business users and devs can collaborate smoothly.
R E Mi Evaluation Model ( Core Differentiator)
Proprietary Investment: Significant R&D differentiator addressing hallucination problem - absent from most competitors
REMi v2 (Current): Llama-REMi v1 based on Llama 3.2-3B with 30x faster inference vs original Mistral implementation
Continuous Quality Monitoring: Evaluates EVERY interaction across four dimensions (0-5 scale)
Answer Relevance: Measures how directly response addresses the query
Context Relevance: Assesses quality of retrieved passages relative to question
Groundedness: Evaluates degree to which answers derive from source context (hallucination detection)
Answer Correctness: Alignment with ground truth when available (optional dimension)
Benchmark Validation: Nuclia with OpenAI embeddings achieved highest scores vs Vectara on Docmatix 1.4k dataset across answer relevance, context relevance, correctness
Real-Time Visibility: Dashboard health displays with 7-day rolling averages and performance graphs (24h to 30d)
Competitive Advantage: Most RAG platforms lack continuous quality evaluation - Progress makes this core differentiator
N/A
N/A
Open- Source Nuclia D B Foundation
GitHub Presence: 710+ stars, AGPLv3 license provides full transparency into core retrieval mechanisms
Technology Stack: Python and Rust implementation for performance and reliability
Managed Infrastructure: Progress removes operational burden while maintaining technical transparency
Four Index Types: Document Index (property filtering), Full Text (keyword/fuzzy search), Chunk/Vector (semantic similarity), Knowledge Graph (entity relationships)
Dynamic Sharding: Automatic shard creation as vectors grow with index node replication for fault tolerance
Open-Source Transparency: NucliaDB foundation (710+ GitHub stars) provides visibility into retrieval mechanisms vs black-box platforms (Lindy.ai)
Comparison Alignment: Direct architectural comparison to CustomGPT.ai is valid - both are RAG-as-a-Service platforms with API-first design
Use Case Fit: Organizations prioritizing knowledge retrieval, semantic search, and generative Q&A over conversational marketing/sales engagement
Platform type: CONVERSATIONAL AI PLATFORM WITH OPENAI ASSISTANT API (not pure RAG-as-a-Service) - chatbot builder with OpenAI-powered knowledge retrieval
RAG architecture: OpenAI Assistant API integration (not native RAG) - relies on OpenAI's embedding and retrieval system
Document support: PDF, DOCX, TXT, CSV, HTML with 200MB per file upload limit
Knowledge limitations: No native website crawling, no YouTube transcript ingestion, no direct cloud storage integrations (Google Drive, Dropbox, Notion)
Manual knowledge management: All knowledge updates require manual file re-upload - no auto-sync or scheduled refresh capabilities
Cloud storage workaround: Zapier, Make, Pabbly Connect middleware required for accessing cloud storage as knowledge sources
Multi-agent orchestration: Good - Role-based task routing with conversation context handoff between agents for complex workflows
LLM flexibility: Excellent - OpenAI (GPT-4, GPT-3.5), Claude (Anthropic), Gemini (Google) with configurable temperature and token limits per agent
Compliance gaps: Poor - No SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, ISO 27001 certifications blocking regulated industry adoption
Enterprise features: Limited - Basic RBAC (3 roles only), no SSO/SAML, no official SDKs for programmatic integration
Best for: Multi-channel customer engagement (WhatsApp, Instagram, Messenger focus), SMBs and agencies prioritizing omnichannel deployment over enterprise RAG features
Core Architecture: Serverless RAG infrastructure with automatic embedding generation, vector search optimization, and LLM orchestration fully managed behind API endpoints
API-First Design: Comprehensive REST API with well-documented endpoints for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data (1,400+ formats), and querying chat
API Documentation
Developer Experience: Open-source Python SDK (customgpt-client), Postman collections, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, and extensive cookbooks for rapid integration
No-Code Alternative: Wizard-style web dashboard enables non-developers to upload content, brand widgets, and deploy chatbots without touching code
Hybrid Target Market: Serves both developer teams wanting robust APIs AND business users seeking no-code RAG deployment - unique positioning vs pure API platforms (Cohere) or pure no-code tools (Jotform)
RAG Technology Leadership: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, proprietary anti-hallucination mechanisms, and citation-backed responses
Benchmark Details
Deployment Flexibility: Cloud-hosted SaaS with auto-scaling, API integrations, embedded chat widgets, ChatGPT Plugin support, and hosted MCP Server for Claude/Cursor/ChatGPT
Enterprise Readiness: SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling, domain allowlisting, RBAC with 2FA/SSO, and flat-rate pricing without per-query charges
Use Case Fit: Ideal for organizations needing both rapid no-code deployment AND robust API capabilities, teams handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), and businesses requiring production-ready RAG without building ML infrastructure from scratch
Competitive Positioning: Bridges the gap between developer-first platforms (Cohere, Deepset) requiring heavy coding and no-code chatbot builders (Jotform, Kommunicate) lacking API depth - offers best of both worlds
Competitive Positioning
Market Position: Enterprise RAG-as-a-Service with genuine no-code accessibility + developer-first API design (dual-track appeal)
vs. CustomGPT: Similar RAG-as-a-Service category, Progress emphasizes REMi quality monitoring + open-source foundation differentiation
vs. Drift/Yellow.ai: TRUE RAG platform vs conversational marketing/sales engagement platforms (fundamentally different categories)
vs. Lindy.ai: Full API/SDK access vs NO public API (Progress developer-friendly, Lindy no-code only)
Integration Gaps: NO native messaging channels (Slack/WhatsApp/Teams) vs omnichannel competitors - requires custom development
HIPAA Gap: No documented certification creates healthcare trust gap vs compliant competitors (Drift has HIPAA)
Recent Acquisition Risk: June 2025 Progress purchase means platform still maturing under new ownership with potential direction changes
Progress Ecosystem Advantage: Integration with OpenEdge, Sitefinity CMS provides distribution channels unavailable to standalone competitors
Market position: Mid-market omnichannel automation platform positioned as affordable alternative to ManyChat and Chatfuel with superior channel coverage (15+ messaging platforms vs 4-5 in competitors); strong agency/reseller focus with Partner plan white-labeling
Target customers: Agencies and resellers requiring white-label capabilities and multi-client management; e-commerce businesses needing WhatsApp Product Catalogue and native checkout; businesses requiring voice/IVR capabilities alongside chat automation
Competitive advantages: $10/month for 12+ channels vs ManyChat $15/month for 4 channels represents 40% lower cost with 3x channel coverage; 160+ template library vs ManyChat 35 templates; voice payment processing during IVR calls (unique capability); Partner plan with 100% profit retention for resellers; QR code channel switching (start web chat, continue on WhatsApp with context preservation); Mini-App ecosystem (119 third-party apps) extends functionality
Pricing advantage: Best value proposition in market - Business plan $10/month for 1,000 users across 8 channels with AI Hub and omnichannel deployment vs competitors charging $15-50/month for fewer channels; no AI cost markup - users connect their own API keys directly to OpenAI/Anthropic/Google
Use case fit: Best for agencies requiring white-label reselling capabilities; e-commerce businesses needing WhatsApp commerce and voice payment processing; multi-channel customer engagement across messaging platforms (WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, Telegram, Line, Viber, WeChat, VK); businesses requiring 99.7% uptime SLA commitment with maximum 10 hours scheduled maintenance annually
Limitations vs. competitors: Analytics described as "pretty basic" vs ManyChat's pixel tracking and advanced funnel analytics; no SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, or ISO 27001 certifications limiting enterprise adoption in regulated industries; limited RBAC with only 3 roles (Owner, Admin, Member) insufficient for complex enterprise needs; no SSO/SAML support constrains identity management integration
Strategic positioning: Competes on price and channel breadth rather than enterprise features or compliance certifications; targets SMBs, agencies, and resellers prioritizing affordability and multi-channel reach over regulatory compliance and advanced analytics
Market position: Leading all-in-one RAG platform balancing enterprise-grade accuracy with developer-friendly APIs and no-code usability for rapid deployment
Target customers: Mid-market to enterprise organizations needing production-ready AI assistants, development teams wanting robust APIs without building RAG infrastructure, and businesses requiring 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription (YouTube, podcasts)
Key competitors: OpenAI Assistants API, Botsonic, Chatbase.co, Azure AI, and custom RAG implementations using LangChain
Competitive advantages: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling included, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, hosted MCP Server support (Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT), generous data limits (60M words Standard, 300M Premium), and flat monthly pricing without per-query charges
Pricing advantage: Transparent flat-rate pricing at $99/month (Standard) and $449/month (Premium) with generous included limits; no hidden costs for API access, branding removal, or basic features; best value for teams needing both no-code dashboard and developer APIs in one platform
Use case fit: Ideal for businesses needing both rapid no-code deployment and robust API capabilities, organizations handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), teams requiring white-label chatbots with source citations for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects, and companies wanting all-in-one RAG without managing ML infrastructure
Deployment & Infrastructure
Fully Managed Cloud: EU (primary) and US data centers with regional API routing (https://{region}.rag.progress.cloud/api/v1/)
Hybrid Deployment: Cloud processing with on-premise NucliaDB storage for data sovereignty requirements
Complete On-Premise: Enterprise tier supports 100% on-premise deployment for maximum data governance
AWS Marketplace: Available November 2025 for streamlined enterprise procurement with existing cloud spend
Dynamic Scaling: Automatic shard creation as vector counts grow with index node replication
Web Component Embedding: <nuclia-search-bar> and <nuclia-chat> for website integration
Multi-Region Support: Regional data residency options (EU/US) for compliance requirements
N/A
N/A
Customer Base & Case Studies
SRS Distribution (Wholesale Building Materials): "Progress Agentic RAG has fundamentally changed how we access and act on information across our organisation. Its ability to deliver fast, accurate, and verifiable insights from our unstructured data has been a game-changer for productivity and decision-making."
BrokerChooser (Financial Services): Replaced keyword search with generative AI, reporting significant conversion increases and better user experience
NAFEMS (Engineering Simulation Association): Knowledge discovery across thousands of technical publications for international membership community
Althaia Hospitals (Spain's Largest Central Catalonia Hospital): Medical protocol search supporting 5,000+ healthcare professionals
Columbia Business School: Academic knowledge discovery and research support
Barry University: Education sector deployment for institutional knowledge management
CCOO (Spain's Largest Trade Union): 1M+ members served with knowledge retrieval platform
Buff Sportswear: Commercial deployment for product and customer knowledge management
Pre-Acquisition Scale: ~20 customers across healthcare, pharmaceutical, education, public administration sectors
N/A
N/A
A I Models
Anthropic Models: Claude 3.7, Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 for safety-focused, high-quality generation
OpenAI Models: ChatGPT 4o, 4o mini for industry-leading language capabilities
Google Models: Gemini Flash 2.5, PaLM2 for multimodal and search-optimized tasks
Meta Models: Llama 3.2 for open-source flexibility and customization
Microsoft/Azure: Mistral Large 2 for enterprise deployments with Azure integration
Cohere Models: Command-R suite for retrieval-optimized generation
Nuclia Private GenAI: 100% data isolation mode for maximum security without third-party LLM exposure
Model Switching: Change providers without architectural changes via Prompt Lab for side-by-side testing
Multi-model support: GPT-4-turbo, GPT-4-vision, GPT-4-32k, GPT-3.5-turbo-1106, Claude (Anthropic), Google Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok (X.AI), Coze
Manual model selection: Per-agent model configuration - no automatic routing or intelligent model switching based on query complexity
OpenAI Assistant API integration: Knowledge retrieval powered by OpenAI's embedding system (not native RAG architecture) with 200MB per file upload limit
Function calling (AI Functions): AI agents can trigger real-time actions during conversations for dynamic workflow automation
Temperature control: Configurable temperature settings per agent for balancing creativity vs predictability in responses
Token limits: 500 tokens for general text generation, 1,000 tokens for complex tasks (configurable per agent)
No AI cost markup: Users connect their own API keys directly to OpenAI/Anthropic/Google - pay providers directly without UChat fees
BYOK (Bring Your Own Key): All LLM costs pass-through to users' own accounts enabling cost transparency and control
Primary models: GPT-5.1 and 4 series from OpenAI, and Anthropic's Claude 4.5 (opus and sonnet) for enterprise needs
Automatic model selection: Balances cost and performance by automatically selecting the appropriate model for each request
Model Selection Details
Proprietary optimizations: Custom prompt engineering and retrieval enhancements for high-quality, citation-backed answers
Managed infrastructure: All model management handled behind the scenes - no API keys or fine-tuning required from users
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms ensure chatbot only answers based on provided content, improving trust and factual accuracy
R A G Capabilities
Agentic RAG Engine: Retrieval agents autonomously select optimal strategies based on query characteristics
Four-Index Hybrid Search: Document (property filtering), Full Text (keyword/fuzzy), Vector/Chunk (semantic), Knowledge Graph (entity relationships)
Multimodal Processing: OCR for scanned documents/images, automatic speech-to-text for audio (MP3, WAV, AIFF), video transcript extraction
60+ Document Formats: PDF, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, plain text, email formats with automatic parsing
Open-Source Foundation: NucliaDB (710+ GitHub stars, AGPLv3) provides transparency into retrieval mechanisms vs black-box platforms
OpenAI Assistant API integration: Document upload via OpenAI's embedding system (not native RAG infrastructure) - relies on OpenAI's vector search capabilities
Document support: PDF, DOCX, TXT, CSV, HTML up to 200MB per file uploaded to OpenAI's knowledge base
LIMITATION: No native website crawling: Content must be extracted and uploaded manually - no automatic URL ingestion or sitemap processing
LIMITATION: No YouTube transcript ingestion: Video content requires manual transcription and text upload
LIMITATION: No cloud storage integrations: No direct Google Drive, Dropbox, or Notion integrations for knowledge sources - possible via Zapier/Make middleware with manual workflow
LIMITATION: No auto-sync: All knowledge updates require manual file re-upload - no scheduled refresh or continuous ingestion
LIMITATION: No RAG parameter controls: Cannot configure chunking strategy, embedding models, similarity thresholds, or retrieval settings - controlled by OpenAI API
Multi-agent orchestration: Role-based task routing with conversation context handoff between specialized agents for complex workflows
Conversation summarization: Automatic summarization after 10-100 messages to maintain context within token limits
Core architecture: GPT-4 combined with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology, outperforming OpenAI in RAG benchmarks
RAG Performance
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms reduce hallucinations and ensure responses are grounded in provided content
Benchmark Details
Automatic citations: Each response includes clickable citations pointing to original source documents for transparency and verification
Optimized pipeline: Efficient vector search, smart chunking, and caching for sub-second reply times
Scalability: Maintains speed and accuracy for massive knowledge bases with tens of millions of words
Context-aware conversations: Multi-turn conversations with persistent history and comprehensive conversation management
Source verification: Always cites sources so users can verify facts on the spot
Use Cases
Enterprise Knowledge Management: Non-technical teams (marketing, HR, legal, customer support) deploying knowledge bases in minutes
Healthcare & Pharma: Althaia Hospitals medical protocol search for 5,000+ healthcare professionals with HIPAA-grade security needs
Financial Services: BrokerChooser replaced keyword search with generative AI for significant conversion increases
Education: Columbia Business School and Barry University for academic knowledge discovery and institutional knowledge management
Engineering & Research: NAFEMS knowledge discovery across thousands of technical publications for international membership
Trade Organizations: CCOO (Spain's largest union) serving 1M+ members with knowledge retrieval platform
Dynamic Knowledge Management: Continuous updates, gap identification, and automatic documentation generation
Developer RAG Backend: API-first infrastructure for building custom AI applications with Prompt Lab experimentation
Agency/reseller white-labeling: Partner plan ($199/month) with full white-labeling, custom domain, branded login/signup pages, 100% profit retention for multi-client management
Omnichannel customer engagement: 15+ messaging platforms (WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, Telegram, Line, Viber, WeChat, VK, Google Business Messenger) with unified inbox
E-commerce automation: WhatsApp Product Catalogue, native checkout within conversations, abandoned cart recovery, Shopify/WooCommerce/Stripe integration for order management
Lead generation: Conversational marketing bots with form-based data collection, CRM sync (Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive), qualification workflows
Multi-step workflow automation: Visual flow builder with 160+ templates, JavaScript function nodes, HTTP requests (GET/POST/PUT/DELETE/PATCH), 6 variable types, mathematical formulas
NOT ideal for: Advanced RAG use cases (no native vector database or embedding controls), enterprise compliance needs (no SOC 2/HIPAA/ISO 27001), complex RBAC requirements (only 3 roles), organizations requiring SSO/SAML integration
Customer support automation: AI assistants handling common queries, reducing support ticket volume, providing 24/7 instant responses with source citations
Internal knowledge management: Employee self-service for HR policies, technical documentation, onboarding materials, company procedures across 1,400+ file formats
Sales enablement: Product information chatbots, lead qualification, customer education with white-labeled widgets on websites and apps
Documentation assistance: Technical docs, help centers, FAQs with automatic website crawling and sitemap indexing
Educational platforms: Course materials, research assistance, student support with multimedia content (YouTube transcriptions, podcasts)
Healthcare information: Patient education, medical knowledge bases (SOC 2 Type II compliant for sensitive data)
Scaling Consideration: Token-based consumption pricing requires careful usage forecasting for budget predictability beyond included tier
Best Value For: Organizations wanting to control costs through usage optimization vs fixed seat-based or per-project pricing models
Free plan: 1 bot, 200 users, 1 member, basic features, 1 channel for development and testing
Business ($10/mo): 1 bot, 1,000 users, 5 members, omnichannel (8 channels), AI Hub with multi-model support, all pro features
Partner ($199/mo): 5 bots, 10,000 users, 5 members, full white-labeling with custom domain, custom pricing capability, 100% profit retention for resellers
Add-ons Business/Partner: Extra bot $10/$5, extra member $10/$5, extra 1K users $5/$5, extra 10K users $30, IP whitelisting (Partner only, paid addon)
Auto-scaling: Plans automatically upgrade when usage limits exceeded to prevent service interruption
No AI cost markup: Users pay OpenAI/Anthropic/Google directly via their own API keys - no UChat margin on LLM costs
No channel fees markup: WhatsApp, SMS, voice costs paid directly to providers (Twilio, Meta, carriers) without UChat markup
Value proposition: $10/month for 12+ channels vs ManyChat $15/month for 4 channels, Chatfuel $49.49/month WhatsApp only - 40-90% cheaper with broader channel support
14-day free trial: No credit card required, access to all features for evaluation before purchase commitment
Standard Plan: $99/month or $89/month annual - 10 custom chatbots, 5,000 items per chatbot, 60 million words per bot, basic helpdesk support, standard security
View Pricing
Premium Plan: $499/month or $449/month annual - 100 custom chatbots, 20,000 items per chatbot, 300 million words per bot, advanced support, enhanced security, additional customization
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing - Comprehensive AI solutions, highest security and compliance, dedicated account managers, custom SSO, token authentication, priority support with faster SLAs
Enterprise Solutions
7-Day Free Trial: Full access to Standard features without charges - available to all users
Annual billing discount: Save 10% by paying upfront annually ($89/mo Standard, $449/mo Premium)
Flat monthly rates: No per-query charges, no hidden costs for API access or white-labeling (included in all plans)
Managed infrastructure: Auto-scaling cloud infrastructure included - no additional hosting or scaling fees
Active community: User community plus 5,000+ app integrations through Zapier ecosystem
Regular updates: Platform stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements automatically
Limitations & Considerations
NO HIPAA Certification Documented: Healthcare organizations processing PHI must contact sales - major compliance gap vs competitors with documented HIPAA
NO Native Messaging Channels: No Slack, WhatsApp, Telegram, or Microsoft Teams integrations - requires custom API-based development
Documentation Fragmentation: Dual portals (docs.rag.progress.cloud + docs.nuclia.dev) during Progress acquisition transition may cause confusion
Recent Acquisition Risk: June 2025 Progress purchase means platform still maturing under new ownership with potential direction changes
Scalability Concerns: Multiple problems limit scalability - hard to scale nodes up/down, write operations affect concurrent search performance
NO Dropbox Integration: Missing Dropbox connector vs competitors - limits cloud storage sync options
NO Notion Integration: Missing Notion connector - gap for knowledge management workflows
NO YouTube Transcript Extraction: Not explicitly documented vs competitors with video indexing features
Missing Features: NO lead capture, NO human handoff/escalation workflows, NO proactive alerting (monitoring exists, alerting undocumented)
Learning Curve: 30+ RAG parameters and Prompt Lab may feel technical for non-developer teams despite no-code dashboard
Best For: Development teams and technical users - powerful for experts but may overwhelm business users wanting simple deployment
Basic analytics: Metrics described as "pretty basic" vs ManyChat's pixel tracking - no open rate/click rate tracking for individual messages, no unrecognized input analytics
OpenAI dependency for RAG: Knowledge retrieval relies on OpenAI Assistant API (not native RAG) - accuracy limited by OpenAI's embedding system and retrieval quality
No native knowledge connectors: Must manually upload documents - no Google Drive, Notion, Confluence, Zendesk integrations for automatic knowledge sync
Limited compliance certifications: No SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, ISO 27001 restricting adoption in regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government)
Basic RBAC: Only 3 roles (Owner, Admin, Member) insufficient for enterprise departmental segregation and granular permission controls
No SSO/SAML: Cannot integrate with enterprise identity providers (Okta, Azure AD, OneLogin) for centralized authentication and user provisioning
No official SDKs: No programming language SDKs (Python, JavaScript, Node.js) - requires direct HTTP calls to REST API for programmatic integrations
Data center transparency: Specific geographic data residency locations not documented publicly - may concern organizations with strict data sovereignty requirements
Manual model selection: No automatic LLM routing based on query complexity - users must configure model per agent manually
Managed service approach: Less control over underlying RAG pipeline configuration compared to build-your-own solutions like LangChain
Vendor lock-in: Proprietary platform - migration to alternative RAG solutions requires rebuilding knowledge bases
Model selection: Limited to OpenAI (GPT-5.1 and 4 series) and Anthropic (Claude, opus and sonnet 4.5) - no support for other LLM providers (Cohere, AI21, open-source models)
Pricing at scale: Flat-rate pricing may become expensive for very high-volume use cases (millions of queries/month) compared to pay-per-use models
Customization limits: While highly configurable, some advanced RAG techniques (custom reranking, hybrid search strategies) may not be exposed
Language support: Supports 90+ languages but performance may vary for less common languages or specialized domains
Real-time data: Knowledge bases require re-indexing for updates - not ideal for real-time data requirements (stock prices, live inventory)
Enterprise features: Some advanced features (custom SSO, token authentication) only available on Enterprise plan with custom pricing
Mini- App Ecosystem
N/A
119 third-party apps available in Mini-App Store
Two development approaches: JSON-based (v1) with explicit auth/API definitions, flow-based (v2) with visual drag-and-drop
Private app stores for Partners
Third-party developer community contributing extensions
N/A
Human Handoff & Live Chat
N/A
Native UChat mobile apps: iOS ("UChat Live Chat"), Android ("UChat")
After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both Progress Agentic RAG and UChat are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.
When to Choose Progress Agentic RAG
You value proprietary remi v2 model (30x faster inference) addresses hallucination problem with continuous quality monitoring - differentiated capability absent from most competitors
Open-source NucliaDB transparency (710+ GitHub stars) with managed infrastructure removes operational burden while maintaining technical visibility
Genuine no-code accessibility: business users (marketing, HR, legal, support) can deploy functional RAG pipelines in minutes via visual dashboard
Best For: Proprietary REMi v2 model (30x faster inference) addresses hallucination problem with continuous quality monitoring - differentiated capability absent from most competitors
When to Choose UChat
You value exceptional value - $10/month for 12+ channels vs manychat's $15/month for 4 channels
Industry-leading white-label capabilities at $199/month with 100% profit retention for agencies
QR code channel switching enables seamless web-to-WhatsApp handoff with conversation context
Best For: Exceptional value - $10/month for 12+ channels vs ManyChat's $15/month for 4 channels
Migration & Switching Considerations
Switching between Progress Agentic RAG and UChat requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.
Pricing Comparison Summary
Progress Agentic RAG starts at $700/month, while UChat begins at $10/month. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.
Our Recommendation Process
Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality
For most organizations, the decision between Progress Agentic RAG and UChat comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.
📚 Next Steps
Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.
• Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
• Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
• Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
• Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements
Last updated: December 12, 2025 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.
The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.
DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.
People Also Compare
Explore more AI tool comparisons to find the perfect solution for your needs
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...