In this comprehensive guide, we compare Pyx and SearchUnify across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.
Overview
When choosing between Pyx and SearchUnify, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose Pyx if: you value very quick setup (30-60 minutes)
Choose SearchUnify if: you value g2 leader for 21 consecutive quarters (5+ years) in enterprise search - exceptional market validation vs newer rag startups
About Pyx
Pyx is find. don't search.. Pyx AI is an enterprise conversational search tool that leverages Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to deliver real-time answers from company data. It continuously synchronizes with data sources and enables natural language queries across unstructured documents without keywords or pre-sorting. Founded in 2022, headquartered in Europe, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
83/100
Starting Price
$30/mo
About SearchUnify
SearchUnify is ai-powered unified enterprise search and knowledge management. Enterprise cognitive search platform with proprietary Federated RAG (FRAG™) architecture, 100+ pre-built connectors, and mature Salesforce integration. G2 Leader for 21 consecutive quarters (5+ years). Parent company Grazitti Interactive (founded 2008) maintains SOC 2 Type 2 + ISO 27001 + HIPAA compliance. BYOLLM flexibility supports OpenAI, Azure, Google Gemini, Hugging Face, custom models. Critical gaps: NO WhatsApp/Telegram messaging, NO public pricing (AWS Marketplace: $0.01-$0.025/request), NO Zapier integration. Enterprise search heritage vs RAG-first positioning. Founded in 2008 (Grazitti), SearchUnify product launched ~2012, headquartered in Panchkula, India / San Jose, CA, USA, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
84/100
Starting Price
Custom
Key Differences at a Glance
In terms of user ratings, both platforms score similarly in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, SearchUnify offers more competitive entry pricing. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: AI Search versus Enterprise Search. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.
⚠️ What This Comparison Covers
We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.
Detailed Feature Comparison
Pyx
SearchUnify
CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
Focuses on unstructured data—you simply point it at your files and it indexes them right away.
Appvizer mention
Keeps connected file repositories in sync automatically, so any document changes show up almost instantly.
Works with common formats (PDF, DOCX, PPT, text, and more) and turns them into a chat-ready knowledge store.
Doesn’t try to crawl whole websites or YouTube—the ingestion scope is intentionally narrower than CustomGPT’s.
Built for enterprise-scale volumes (exact limits not published) and aims for near-real-time indexing of large corporate data sets.
12MB Size Limit: Upper limit per document field - may constrain large PDF processing vs unlimited competitors
Website Crawling: Public and gated sites (excluding CAPTCHA-protected), configurable depth, JavaScript-enabled, sitemap support (.txt/.xml), custom HTML selectors
LMS Systems: Docebo, Absorb LMS, LearnUpon, Saba Cloud for training content
Video Platforms: YouTube, Vimeo, Wistia, Vidyard with transcript extraction
Universal Content API: Custom connector development for unsupported platforms
Lets you ingest more than 1,400 file formats—PDF, DOCX, TXT, Markdown, HTML, and many more—via simple drag-and-drop or API.
Crawls entire sites through sitemaps and URLs, automatically indexing public help-desk articles, FAQs, and docs.
Turns multimedia into text on the fly: YouTube videos, podcasts, and other media are auto-transcribed with built-in OCR and speech-to-text.
View Transcription Guide
Connects to Google Drive, SharePoint, Notion, Confluence, HubSpot, and more through API connectors or Zapier.
See Zapier Connectors
Supports both manual uploads and auto-sync retraining, so your knowledge base always stays up to date.
Integrations & Channels
Comes with its own chat/search interface rather than a “deploy everywhere” model.
No built-in Slack bot, Zapier connector, or public API for external embeds.
Most users interact through Pyx’s web or desktop UI; synergy with other chat platforms is minimal for now.
Any deeper integration (say, Slack commands) would require custom dev work or future product updates.
Native Search Clients: Salesforce Service Console/Communities, ServiceNow, Zendesk Support/Help Center, Khoros Aurora/Classic, Slack
White-Labeling: Supported through custom branding elements (explicit 'white-label' documentation not found)
Domain Restrictions: Platform-specific deployment configurations and role-based content permissions
Visual Search Tuning: Boost or downgrade document rankings without code via admin UI
NLP Manager: Synonym, acronym, keyword configuration via visual interface
Temperature Controls: Per-persona, use case, and audience type creativity adjustment for LLM responses
Fully white-labels the widget—colors, logos, icons, CSS, everything can match your brand.
White-label Options
Provides a no-code dashboard to set welcome messages, bot names, and visual themes.
Lets you shape the AI’s persona and tone using pre-prompts and system instructions.
Uses domain allowlisting to ensure the chatbot appears only on approved sites.
L L M Model Options
Doesn’t expose model choice—Pyx likely runs GPT-3.5 or GPT-4 under the hood, but you can’t switch or fine-tune it.
No toggles for speed vs. accuracy; every query uses the same model configuration.
Focuses on its RAG engine with a single, undisclosed LLM—less flexible than tools that let you pick GPT-3.5 or GPT-4 explicitly.
No advanced re-ranking or multi-model routing options are mentioned.
BYOLLM Architecture: Bring Your Own LLM flexibility avoiding vendor lock-in
Partner-Provisioned: Claude via Amazon Bedrock (14-day trial), OpenAI Service
Self-Provisioned OpenAI: GPT models via API key with full configuration control
Azure OpenAI Service: Complete endpoint configuration for enterprise Azure deployments
Google Gemini: Integration for Google's multimodal LLM capabilities
Hugging Face: Open-source model support for custom or community models
In-House Custom Models: Support for proprietary inference models and custom deployments
Multiple LLM Connections: Connect multiple providers simultaneously with activation toggles
Fallback Mechanisms: Automatic failover when primary LLMs become inaccessible
Temperature Controls: Adjust creativity by persona, use case, audience type for each LLM
CRITICAL: NO Automatic Model Routing: No intelligent selection based on query characteristics - manual configuration required vs competitors with query complexity-based routing
Taps into top models—OpenAI’s GPT-5.1 series, GPT-4 series, and even Anthropic’s Claude for enterprise needs (4.5 opus and sonnet, etc ).
Automatically balances cost and performance by picking the right model for each request.
Model Selection Details
Uses proprietary prompt engineering and retrieval tweaks to return high-quality, citation-backed answers.
Handles all model management behind the scenes—no extra API keys or fine-tuning steps for you.
Developer Experience ( A P I & S D Ks)
No open API or official SDKs—everything happens through the Pyx interface.
Embedding Pyx into other apps or calling it programmatically isn’t supported today.
Closed ecosystem: no GitHub examples or community plug-ins.
Great for teams wanting a turnkey tool, but it limits deep customization or dev-driven extensions.
Three Official SDKs: JavaScript/Node.js (su-sdk on NPM), Python (searchunify on PyPI), Java (Maven artifact)
Python SDK: Full API coverage with 22+ analytics methods for data analysis and reporting
Java SDK: Non-blocking I/O, high concurrency, data marshaling for enterprise Java applications
RESTful API v2: Swagger documentation at each instance with v2-prefixed endpoints
API Categories: Search (/v2_search/), Content Source management (/v2_cs/), Analytics (/api/v2/)
OAuth 2.0 Authentication: Password grant and client credentials with 4-hour access tokens, 14-day refresh tokens
MCP (Model Context Protocol) Support: su-mcp library for Claude Desktop and similar LLM tooling integration
Documentation Quality: Solid core API coverage with curl examples and authentication guides
CRITICAL: CRITICAL GAPS - Rate Limits: Specific limits require community documentation access - transparency gap vs competitors with public rate limit tables
CRITICAL: NO API Versioning Policy: No documented deprecation policy - potential breaking change risk
CRITICAL: LIMITED Cookbook Examples: Basic code samples but not comprehensive practical examples vs competitors with extensive cookbook libraries
Ships a well-documented REST API for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data, and querying chat.
API Documentation
Supplies rich docs, tutorials, cookbooks, and FAQs to get you started fast.
Developer Docs
Offers quick email and in-app chat support—Premium and Enterprise plans add dedicated managers and faster SLAs.
Enterprise Solutions
Benefits from an active user community plus integrations through Zapier and GitHub resources.
Additional Considerations
Great if you want a no-fuss, internal knowledge chat that employees can use without coding.
Not ideal for public-facing chatbots or developer-heavy customization.
Shines as a single, siloed AI search environment rather than a broad, extensible platform.
Simpler in scope than CustomGPT—less flexible, but easier to stand up quickly for internal use cases.
Enterprise-First Platform: Designed for large organizations with complex, federated knowledge ecosystems - may be overwhelming for small businesses seeking simple chatbot solutions
Implementation Complexity: While pre-built connectors accelerate deployment (7-14 days), proper configuration of 100+ sources, FRAG™ architecture, and SUVA agents requires thoughtful planning and technical expertise
Learning Curve for Advanced Features: Temperature controls, NLP Manager, visual search tuning, and multi-LLM configuration provide powerful customization but require understanding of AI/RAG concepts for optimal utilization
Cost Structure Opacity: Lack of public pricing transparency creates evaluation friction - potential customers must engage sales for quotes, making competitive comparison difficult without significant time investment
Annual Price Escalation Risk: User reviews consistently mention "guaranteed price increase every year" - organizations should factor long-term budget growth into ROI calculations and contract negotiations
Integration Gaps for Modern Workflows: Missing Zapier (7,000+ app ecosystem), Notion (popular knowledge base), and consumer messaging platforms (WhatsApp, Telegram) limit use cases vs competitors with broader integration catalogs
Limited Customization for External Use: Platform optimized for internal employee support and customer self-service portals - not designed for white-labeled external chatbot products or complex conversational commerce applications
Cloud-Only Deployment Constraint: Organizations requiring air-gapped environments, on-premise data residency, or hybrid cloud architectures cannot use SearchUnify (vs competitors like Cohere offering private deployment options)
Document Size Limitations: 12MB per document field may constrain processing of large technical manuals, legal documents, or comprehensive training materials vs competitors with unlimited document ingestion
Manual LLM Configuration Required: No automatic model routing based on query complexity - IT teams must manually configure which LLM handles which scenarios vs intelligent routing competitors
API Documentation Transparency Gaps: Rate limits require community access, no public API versioning policy, limited cookbook examples compared to developer-first platforms with comprehensive API documentation and sandbox environments
Best For: Large enterprises with Salesforce-centric operations, organizations with 100+ fragmented knowledge sources, regulated industries requiring SOC 2/HIPAA/GDPR compliance, teams prioritizing federated search accuracy over rapid deployment simplicity
NOT Ideal For: Small businesses with limited budgets, startups needing rapid prototyping without sales engagement, organizations requiring consumer messaging platform support, teams seeking white-labeled external chatbot products, companies needing air-gapped/on-premise deployment
Slashes engineering overhead with an all-in-one RAG platform—no in-house ML team required.
Gets you to value quickly: launch a functional AI assistant in minutes.
Stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements, so you’re always on the latest tech.
Balances top-tier accuracy with ease of use, perfect for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects.
No- Code Interface & Usability
Presents a straightforward web/desktop UI: users log in, ask questions, and get answers—no coding needed.
Admins connect data sources through a no-code interface, and Pyx indexes them automatically.
Offers minimal customization controls on purpose—keeps the UI consistent and uncluttered.
Perfect for an internal Q&A hub, but not for external embedding or heavy brand customization.
97-98% G2 Usability Satisfaction: Consistently high ratings for "Ease of Doing Business With"
Visual Content Source Configuration: OAuth flows handled through admin UI without manual setup
Pre-Built Templates: Knowbler for KCS-aligned knowledge articles with structured creation workflows
Drag-and-Drop Components: Salesforce Console search client components for visual customization
NLP Manager: Synonym, acronym, keyword configuration without coding requirements
Visual Search Tuning: Boost or downgrade document rankings via UI sliders and controls
SUVA Agent Builder: Visual configuration for up to 5 virtual agents per instance
Analytics Dashboard: Point-and-click metric exploration with AI-generated Actionable Insights
Guided Workflows: Step-by-step contextual help for common admin tasks
Offers a wizard-style web dashboard so non-devs can upload content, brand the widget, and monitor performance.
Supports drag-and-drop uploads, visual theme editing, and in-browser chatbot testing.
User Experience Review
Uses role-based access so business users and devs can collaborate smoothly.
Competitive Positioning
Market position: Turnkey internal knowledge search tool (Germany-based) designed as standalone application for employee Q&A, not embeddable chatbot platform
Target customers: Small to mid-size European teams needing simple internal knowledge search, organizations prioritizing GDPR compliance and German data residency, and companies wanting no-fuss deployment without developer involvement
Key competitors: Glean, Guru, notion AI, and traditional enterprise search tools; less comparable to customer-facing chatbots like CustomGPT/Botsonic
Competitive advantages: Intentionally simple scope with minimal configuration overhead, auto-sync keeping knowledge base current without manual uploads, Germany-based with implicit GDPR compliance and EU data residency, seat-based pricing (~$30/user/month) clear and predictable, and strong access controls with role-based permissions for secure internal deployment
Pricing advantage: ~$30 per user per month seat-based pricing; cost-effective for small teams but can scale expensively for large organizations; simpler pricing than usage-based platforms but less economical for high user counts; best value for teams <50 users needing internal search only
Use case fit: Perfect for small European teams wanting simple internal knowledge Q&A without coding, organizations needing GDPR-compliant employee knowledge base with German data residency, and companies prioritizing quick setup over flexibility; not suitable for public-facing chatbots, API integrations, or heavy customization requirements
Market Position: Enterprise cognitive search leader with RAG enhancement vs pure-play RAG startups
5+ Years Market Leadership: G2 Leader 21 consecutive quarters in Enterprise Search - exceptional validation vs newer RAG platforms
IDC/Forrester Recognition: IDC MarketScape 2024 Major Player (Knowledge Management), Forrester Wave Q3 2021 Strong Performer (Cognitive Search)
FRAG™ Differentiator: Proprietary 3-layer federated architecture specifically designed for enterprise hallucination mitigation vs generic RAG implementations
100+ Connector Advantage: Dramatically reduced integration effort vs platforms requiring custom connector development for enterprise systems
Salesforce Strength: Summit Partner status with native Service Console/Communities clients, drag-and-drop components, AppExchange - unmatched depth vs API-only Salesforce integrations
YouTube Capability: Transcript-based timestamped search rare among RAG platforms - strong for video training content
BYOLLM Flexibility: Claude, OpenAI, Azure, Google Gemini, Hugging Face, custom models vs vendor lock-in from single-provider platforms
Enterprise Security: SOC 1/2/3 + ISO 27001/27701 + HIPAA + GDPR with single-tenant architecture competitive with Cohere, Progress enterprise offerings
vs. CustomGPT: SearchUnify enterprise search platform + RAG vs likely more developer-first RAG API - different target markets
vs. Cohere: SearchUnify 100+ connectors + no-code usability vs Cohere superior AI models + air-gapped deployment
vs. Progress: SearchUnify FRAG™ + Salesforce depth vs Progress REMi quality monitoring + open-source NucliaDB
vs. Chatling/Jotform: SearchUnify enterprise cognitive search vs SMB no-code chatbot tools - fundamentally different scales
CRITICAL: Pricing Transparency Gap: NO public pricing vs competitors with published tiers - requires sales engagement and annual escalation clauses
CRITICAL: Consumer Messaging Absent: NO WhatsApp, Telegram, Zapier vs omnichannel competitors - enterprise support channels only
CRITICAL: Cloud-Only Limitation: NO on-premise/air-gapped deployment vs Cohere's private deployment options for highly regulated industries
Market position: Leading all-in-one RAG platform balancing enterprise-grade accuracy with developer-friendly APIs and no-code usability for rapid deployment
Target customers: Mid-market to enterprise organizations needing production-ready AI assistants, development teams wanting robust APIs without building RAG infrastructure, and businesses requiring 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription (YouTube, podcasts)
Key competitors: OpenAI Assistants API, Botsonic, Chatbase.co, Azure AI, and custom RAG implementations using LangChain
Competitive advantages: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling included, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, hosted MCP Server support (Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT), generous data limits (60M words Standard, 300M Premium), and flat monthly pricing without per-query charges
Pricing advantage: Transparent flat-rate pricing at $99/month (Standard) and $449/month (Premium) with generous included limits; no hidden costs for API access, branding removal, or basic features; best value for teams needing both no-code dashboard and developer APIs in one platform
Use case fit: Ideal for businesses needing both rapid no-code deployment and robust API capabilities, organizations handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), teams requiring white-label chatbots with source citations for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects, and companies wanting all-in-one RAG without managing ML infrastructure
A I Models
Undisclosed LLM: Likely runs GPT-3.5 or GPT-4 under the hood but exact model not publicly documented
NO Model Selection: Cannot switch or choose between different LLMs - single model configuration for all queries
NO Model Toggles: No speed vs accuracy options - every query uses same model configuration
Opaque Architecture: Model details, context window size, and capabilities not exposed to users
Focus on Simplicity: Intentionally hides technical complexity - users ask questions, get answers
NO Fine-Tuning: Cannot customize or train model on specific domain data for specialized responses
Single RAG Engine: Less flexible than tools offering explicit GPT-3.5/GPT-4 choice or multi-model support
BYOLLM (Bring Your Own LLM) Architecture: Avoid vendor lock-in with flexible model selection
Partner-Provisioned LLMs: Claude via Amazon Bedrock (14-day trial), OpenAI GPT models with managed service
Self-Provisioned OpenAI: Connect your own OpenAI API key with full configuration control (GPT-4, GPT-3.5-turbo, etc.)
Azure OpenAI Service: Complete endpoint configuration for enterprise Azure deployments with data residency control
Google Gemini: Integration for Google's multimodal LLM capabilities and competitive pricing
Hugging Face Models: Open-source model support for custom or community models (Llama, Falcon, etc.)
Custom In-House Models: Support for proprietary inference models and custom deployments
Multiple LLM Connections: Connect multiple providers simultaneously with activation toggles and automatic failover
Temperature Controls: Adjust creativity by persona, use case, and audience type for each LLM
No Automatic Model Routing: Manual configuration required vs competitors with query complexity-based routing
Primary models: GPT-5.1 and 4 series from OpenAI, and Anthropic's Claude 4.5 (opus and sonnet) for enterprise needs
Automatic model selection: Balances cost and performance by automatically selecting the appropriate model for each request
Model Selection Details
Proprietary optimizations: Custom prompt engineering and retrieval enhancements for high-quality, citation-backed answers
Managed infrastructure: All model management handled behind the scenes - no API keys or fine-tuning required from users
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms ensure chatbot only answers based on provided content, improving trust and factual accuracy
R A G Capabilities
Basic RAG Implementation: Conversational search over enterprise documents with context-aware follow-up questions
Document Formats: Supports PDF, DOCX, PPT, TXT and more common enterprise formats
NO Advanced Controls: No chunking parameters, embedding model selection, or similarity threshold configuration exposed
NO Anti-Hallucination Metrics: No detailed transparency on citation attribution or confidence scoring mechanisms
NO Re-Ranking: No advanced re-ranking or turbo retrieval options mentioned
Closed System: RAG engine optimized for internal Q&A - limited visibility into underlying retrieval architecture
Competitive Performance: Likely competitive with standard GPT-based RAG for relevance but lacks published benchmarks
FRAG™ (Federated RAG) Architecture: Proprietary 3-layer framework specifically designed for hallucination mitigation in enterprise knowledge retrieval
Federation Layer: Constructs 360-degree enterprise context by unifying data across all 100+ connected sources simultaneously
Retrieval Layer: Filters responses using keyword matching, semantic similarity, and vector search for comprehensive result accuracy
Augmented Generation Layer: Produces responses using neural networks with temperature-controlled creativity balancing accuracy and natural language
Vector Search Integration: Semantic embedding-based retrieval combined with traditional keyword matching
Hybrid Search: Reciprocal rank fusion combines dense and sparse retrieval for best-of-both-worlds accuracy
Multi-Repository Context: Documentation, forums, LMS, CRM, support tickets unified for comprehensive answer grounding
SUVA "World's First Federated RAG Chatbot": Analyzes 20+ attributes (customer history, similar cases, past resolutions) across federated enterprise sources
Hallucination Mitigation: 3-layer FRAG architecture with sensitive data removal before LLM transmission and response analysis preventing leakage
User Feedback Loops: Continuous improvement through response validation and audit mechanisms
Fallback Generation: Maintains service during LLM downtime with alternative response mechanisms
Core architecture: GPT-4 combined with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology, outperforming OpenAI in RAG benchmarks
RAG Performance
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms reduce hallucinations and ensure responses are grounded in provided content
Benchmark Details
Automatic citations: Each response includes clickable citations pointing to original source documents for transparency and verification
Optimized pipeline: Efficient vector search, smart chunking, and caching for sub-second reply times
Scalability: Maintains speed and accuracy for massive knowledge bases with tens of millions of words
Context-aware conversations: Multi-turn conversations with persistent history and comprehensive conversation management
Source verification: Always cites sources so users can verify facts on the spot
Use Cases
Internal Knowledge Search: Primary use case - employees asking questions about company documents and policies
Document Q&A: Quick answers from internal documentation without manual searching through files
Team Onboarding: New employees finding information in knowledge base without bothering colleagues
Policy & Procedure Lookup: HR, compliance, and operational procedure retrieval for staff
Small European Teams: GDPR-compliant internal search for EU organizations prioritizing data residency
No-Code Deployment: Non-technical teams wanting simple setup without developer involvement
NOT SUITABLE FOR: Public-facing chatbots, customer support, API integrations, multi-channel deployment, or heavy customization requirements
Enterprise Customer Support: SUVA virtual assistant deflects support tickets with federated knowledge across all enterprise systems (99.7% cost savings at Accela)
Salesforce Service Cloud Enhancement: Native Service Console and Communities integration for unified knowledge search within Salesforce workflows
Multi-System Knowledge Unification: Consolidate fragmented knowledge across 100+ systems (CRM, LMS, forums, documentation, SharePoint, etc.)
Employee Self-Service: Internal help desks and HR portals with federated search across all internal knowledge sources
Customer Community Portals: Self-service communities with SearchUnifyGPT™ answers and traditional search results side-by-side
Training & LMS Search: Unified search across Docebo, Absorb LMS, YouTube transcripts, and documentation for training content discovery
Contact Center Optimization: Agent Helper provides real-time knowledge suggestions during live support interactions to improve resolution times
Case Deflection: 98% self-service resolution (Cornerstone OnDemand) reducing support ticket volume and operational costs
Customer support automation: AI assistants handling common queries, reducing support ticket volume, providing 24/7 instant responses with source citations
Internal knowledge management: Employee self-service for HR policies, technical documentation, onboarding materials, company procedures across 1,400+ file formats
Sales enablement: Product information chatbots, lead qualification, customer education with white-labeled widgets on websites and apps
Documentation assistance: Technical docs, help centers, FAQs with automatic website crawling and sitemap indexing
Educational platforms: Course materials, research assistance, student support with multimedia content (YouTube transcriptions, podcasts)
Healthcare information: Patient education, medical knowledge bases (SOC 2 Type II compliant for sensitive data)
E-commerce: Product recommendations, order assistance, customer inquiries with API integration to 5,000+ apps via Zapier
SaaS onboarding: User guides, feature explanations, troubleshooting with multi-agent support for different teams
Security & Compliance
GDPR Compliance: Germany-based with implicit EU data protection compliance
German Data Residency: EU data storage location for organizations requiring regional data sovereignty
Enterprise Privacy: Each customer's data isolated and encrypted in transit and at rest
NO Model Training: Customer data not used to train external LLMs - queries stay private beyond internal indexing
Role-Based Access: Built-in access controls - admins set who can see what documents
NO Cross-Account Data: Data never mixed between customers - strict tenant isolation
Limited Certifications: On-prem deployment or detailed security certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001) not publicly documented
NO HIPAA Certification: Not documented for healthcare PHI processing - not suitable for regulated medical data
Best For: European SMBs needing GDPR compliance without enterprise certification requirements
SOC Certifications: SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 from parent company Grazitti Interactive
ISO 27001:2013: Information Security Management System compliance for enterprise data protection
ISO 27701:2019: Privacy Information Management System certification for global privacy requirements
HIPAA Compliant: Healthcare data protection requirements met for medical organizations
GDPR Compliant: Acts as data processor with EU data protection compliance and Standard Contractual Clauses
Single-Tenant Architecture: Customer data isolation preventing cross-tenant information leakage
AES-256 Encryption: Data at rest protection with industry-standard encryption
TLS 1.3 in Transit: Latest transport layer security for data transmission
SSO Integration: SAML 2.0 with Okta, Azure AD, OneLogin, CyberArk, Google Workspace for centralized identity management
FRAG Security: Sensitive data removal before third-party LLM transmission, response analysis preventing leakage, zero-retention policies for LLM interactions
Detailed Audit Trails: Prompts and responses logged for compliance with 30-day retention and CSV export
RBAC: Super Admin, Admin, Moderator roles with configurable permissions and activity tracking
Encryption: SSL/TLS for data in transit, 256-bit AES encryption for data at rest
SOC 2 Type II certification: Industry-leading security standards with regular third-party audits
Security Certifications
GDPR compliance: Full compliance with European data protection regulations, ensuring data privacy and user rights
Access controls: Role-based access control (RBAC), two-factor authentication (2FA), SSO integration for enterprise security
Data isolation: Customer data stays isolated and private - platform never trains on user data
Domain allowlisting: Ensures chatbot appears only on approved sites for security and brand protection
Secure deployments: ChatGPT Plugin support for private use cases with controlled access
Pricing & Plans
Seat-Based Pricing: ~$30 per user per month
Cost-Effective for Small Teams: Affordable for teams under 50 users with predictable monthly costs
Scalability Challenge: Can become expensive for large organizations (100 users = $3,000/month)
NO Published Document Limits: Content may be "unlimited" - gated only by user seats rather than storage caps
Free Trial Available: Hands-on evaluation before committing to paid plan
Enterprise Deals: Custom pricing available for larger deployments with volume discounts
Simple Scaling: Add more seats as team grows - no complex usage-based billing
Best Value For: Small European teams (<50 users) needing predictable costs vs token/usage-based platforms
No Public Pricing: Website requires custom enterprise quotes - transparency gap vs competitors with published tiers
AWS Marketplace Pricing (Revealed): Up to 100K searches/month at $0.025/request, up to 200K at $0.015/request, up to 300K at $0.01/request
Unlimited Content Sources: Flat subscription pricing with no per-connector fees for 100+ pre-built integrations
Free Trials: Available without credit card requirement for evaluation and proof-of-concept
Annual Price Escalation: User reviews note "guaranteed price increase every year" - budget unpredictability concern
7-14 Day Deployment: Using pre-built connectors for rapid implementation timeframe
Multi-Geographic AWS: Automatic backups across regions for data redundancy and disaster recovery
Enterprise Consulting: Assess, Advise, Engage packages for implementation support and best practices guidance
Scalability: Platform scales from small teams to large organizations without architectural changes
Standard Plan: $99/month or $89/month annual - 10 custom chatbots, 5,000 items per chatbot, 60 million words per bot, basic helpdesk support, standard security
View Pricing
Premium Plan: $499/month or $449/month annual - 100 custom chatbots, 20,000 items per chatbot, 300 million words per bot, advanced support, enhanced security, additional customization
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing - Comprehensive AI solutions, highest security and compliance, dedicated account managers, custom SSO, token authentication, priority support with faster SLAs
Enterprise Solutions
7-Day Free Trial: Full access to Standard features without charges - available to all users
Annual billing discount: Save 10% by paying upfront annually ($89/mo Standard, $449/mo Premium)
Flat monthly rates: No per-query charges, no hidden costs for API access or white-labeling (included in all plans)
Managed infrastructure: Auto-scaling cloud infrastructure included - no additional hosting or scaling fees
Support & Documentation
Direct Support: Email, phone, and chat support with hands-on onboarding approach
User-Friendly Setup: Minimal admin overhead - connect data sources and employees start asking questions
NO Open-Source Community: Closed solution without external plug-ins or user-built extensions
NO Public API: No developer documentation or programmatic access for custom integrations
Product Roadmap: Updates come from Pyx's own roadmap - no user-contributed features or marketplace
Quick Deployment: Emphasizes fast setup and minimal configuration vs complex enterprise platforms
Limited Technical Depth: Support focused on basic usage - not extensive developer or API documentation
Best For: Non-technical teams wanting simple, reliable support without complex integration needs
SearchUnify Academy: Free self-paced training with certifications covering cognitive search fundamentals, search tuning, content source configuration, platform administration
Swagger Documentation: Per-instance API documentation with curl examples and authentication guides at each deployment
Three Official SDKs: JavaScript/Node.js (su-sdk on NPM), Python (searchunify on PyPI), Java (Maven artifact) with comprehensive method coverage
MCP (Model Context Protocol) Support: su-mcp library for Claude Desktop and similar LLM tooling integration
Community Forum: User forum and knowledge base access for peer support and best practices sharing
Enterprise Support Channels: Phone, email, chat support for enterprise customers with SLA guarantees
Implementation Consulting: Assess, Advise, Engage packages for deployment assistance and optimization
Dedicated Account Management: Enterprise tier with assigned account managers and quarterly business reviews
97-98% G2 Satisfaction: "Ease of Doing Business With" rating from customer reviews indicating strong relationship management
Guided Workflows: Contextual help suggestions for admin onboarding and platform navigation
Documentation hub: Rich docs, tutorials, cookbooks, FAQs, API references for rapid onboarding
Developer Docs
Email and in-app support: Quick support via email and in-app chat for all users
Premium support: Premium and Enterprise plans include dedicated account managers and faster SLAs
Code samples: Cookbooks, step-by-step guides, and examples for every skill level
API Documentation
No Consumer Messaging Platforms: Missing WhatsApp, Telegram, Facebook Messenger native integrations - enterprise support channels only
No Zapier Integration: Significant gap for no-code workflow automation - competitors offer 7,000-8,000+ app connections
Cloud-Only Deployment: No on-premise or air-gapped deployment options - may disqualify certain regulated industries
No Automatic Model Routing: Manual LLM configuration required vs intelligent query-based routing in competitors
12MB Document Size Limit: Upper limit per document field may constrain large PDF processing vs unlimited competitors
No Notion Integration: Notable absence from cloud storage connectors vs competitors supporting Notion knowledge bases
Rate Limits Not Public: Specific API rate limits require community documentation access - transparency gap
No API Versioning Policy: Undocumented deprecation policy - potential breaking change risk for integrations
Limited API Cookbook Examples: Basic code samples but not comprehensive practical examples vs competitors with extensive libraries
Managed service approach: Less control over underlying RAG pipeline configuration compared to build-your-own solutions like LangChain
Vendor lock-in: Proprietary platform - migration to alternative RAG solutions requires rebuilding knowledge bases
Model selection: Limited to OpenAI (GPT-5.1 and 4 series) and Anthropic (Claude, opus and sonnet 4.5) - no support for other LLM providers (Cohere, AI21, open-source models)
Pricing at scale: Flat-rate pricing may become expensive for very high-volume use cases (millions of queries/month) compared to pay-per-use models
Customization limits: While highly configurable, some advanced RAG techniques (custom reranking, hybrid search strategies) may not be exposed
Language support: Supports 90+ languages but performance may vary for less common languages or specialized domains
Real-time data: Knowledge bases require re-indexing for updates - not ideal for real-time data requirements (stock prices, live inventory)
Enterprise features: Some advanced features (custom SSO, token authentication) only available on Enterprise plan with custom pricing
Core Agent Features
NO Agent Capabilities: Pyx AI does not offer autonomous agents, tool calling, or multi-agent orchestration features
Conversational Search Only: Provides context-aware dialogue for internal knowledge Q&A - not agentic behavior or autonomous decision-making
Basic RAG Architecture: Standard retrieval-augmented generation without agent-specific enhancements (no function calling, no tool use, no workflows)
Follow-Up Questions: Maintains conversation context for multi-turn dialogue but no autonomous reasoning or task execution capabilities
Closed System: Standalone application without extensibility for agent frameworks (LangChain, CrewAI) or external tool integration
Auto-Sync Automation: Connected file repositories auto-sync (automation feature) but not agent-driven - simple scheduled indexing
No External Actions: Cannot invoke APIs, execute code, query databases, or interact with external systems - pure knowledge retrieval
Internal Knowledge Focus: Designed for employee Q&A about company documents - not task automation or agentic workflows
Platform Philosophy: Intentionally simple scope with minimal configuration - avoids complexity of agentic systems
Use Case Limitation: Suitable for knowledge search only - not for autonomous agents, workflow automation, or complex reasoning tasks
SUVA Virtual Assistant: "World's First Federated RAG Chatbot" analyzing 20+ attributes (customer history, similar cases, past resolutions)
Multi-Turn Conversation: Context retention across sessions with conversation memory
Lead Capture: Custom slots and in-chat case creation for lead generation
Human Handoff: Seamless escalation to Salesforce, Zendesk, Khoros with full conversation history transfer
Intent Recognition: Unsupervised ML with NER entity extraction and sentiment analysis
Voice Capabilities: Speech-to-Text and Text-to-Speech integration
35+ Languages: Native handling for Arabic, German, French, Mandarin Chinese with extended support via translation CSV
Up to 5 Virtual Agents: Per instance deployable across internal and customer-facing portals
Temperature Controls: Adjust response creativity by persona, use case, and audience type
SearchUnifyGPT™: LLM answers with inline citations above traditional search results
Custom AI Agents: Build autonomous agents powered by GPT-4 and Claude that can perform tasks independently and make real-time decisions based on business knowledge
Decision-Support Capabilities: AI agents analyze proprietary data to provide insights, recommendations, and actionable responses specific to your business domain
Multi-Agent Systems: Deploy multiple specialized AI agents that can collaborate and optimize workflows in areas like customer support, sales, and internal knowledge management
Memory & Context Management: Agents maintain conversation history and persistent context for coherent multi-turn interactions
View Agent Documentation
Tool Integration: Agents can trigger actions, integrate with external APIs via webhooks, and connect to 5,000+ apps through Zapier for automated workflows
Hyper-Accurate Responses: Leverages advanced RAG technology and retrieval mechanisms to deliver context-aware, citation-backed responses grounded in your knowledge base
Continuous Learning: Agents improve over time through automatic re-indexing of knowledge sources and integration of new data without manual retraining
R A G-as-a- Service Assessment
Platform Type: NOT TRUE RAG-AS-A-SERVICE - Pyx AI is a standalone internal knowledge search application, not API-accessible RAG platform
Core Focus: Turnkey internal Q&A tool for employees - self-contained application vs developer-accessible RAG infrastructure
NO API Access: No REST API, SDKs, or programmatic access - fundamentally different from API-first RaaS platforms (CustomGPT, Vectara, Nuclia)
Closed Application: Users access via web/desktop interface only - cannot build custom applications on top or integrate with other systems
No Developer Features: No embedding endpoints, chunking configuration, retrieval customization, or model selection - opaque RAG implementation
Comparison Category Mismatch: Invalid comparison to RAG-as-a-Service platforms - more comparable to internal search tools (Glean, Guru, Notion AI)
SaaS vs RaaS: Software-as-a-Service (standalone app) NOT Retrieval-as-a-Service (API infrastructure for developers)
Best Comparison Category: Internal knowledge management tools (Glean, Guru), NOT developer RAG platforms (CustomGPT, Pinecone Assistant)
Use Case Fit: Small teams (<50 users) wanting simple employee knowledge search - not organizations building custom AI applications
No Extensibility: Cannot embed in websites, build chatbots, integrate with business systems - siloed internal tool only
GDPR Appeal: Germany-based with implicit compliance - suitable for European SMBs prioritizing data residency over platform capabilities
Platform Recommendation: Should be compared to internal search tools (Glean, Guru), not listed alongside RAG-as-a-Service platforms
Platform Type: ENTERPRISE COGNITIVE SEARCH PLATFORM with RAG capabilities - NOT RAG-first product positioning
Market Heritage: 5+ years enterprise search leadership (G2 Leader 21 consecutive quarters) with RAG added as enhancement vs built RAG-first
FRAG™ Architecture: Proprietary Federated RAG specifically designed for enterprise knowledge unification and hallucination mitigation
Developer Access: Three official SDKs (JavaScript, Python, Java) + RESTful API + MCP support provide programmatic control
Comparison Validity: Architectural comparison to CustomGPT.ai is VALID but highlights different priorities - SearchUnify enterprise search platform with RAG vs likely more developer-first RAG API from CustomGPT
Use Case Fit: Large enterprises with fragmented knowledge across 100+ systems (Salesforce-centric orgs especially), organizations prioritizing enterprise security/compliance, teams needing mature analytics and no-code usability
NOT Ideal For: Developers seeking lightweight API-first RAG, SMBs without enterprise platform ecosystem, consumer-facing chatbot deployments (WhatsApp/Telegram absent)
Core Architecture: Serverless RAG infrastructure with automatic embedding generation, vector search optimization, and LLM orchestration fully managed behind API endpoints
API-First Design: Comprehensive REST API with well-documented endpoints for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data (1,400+ formats), and querying chat
API Documentation
Developer Experience: Open-source Python SDK (customgpt-client), Postman collections, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, and extensive cookbooks for rapid integration
No-Code Alternative: Wizard-style web dashboard enables non-developers to upload content, brand widgets, and deploy chatbots without touching code
Hybrid Target Market: Serves both developer teams wanting robust APIs AND business users seeking no-code RAG deployment - unique positioning vs pure API platforms (Cohere) or pure no-code tools (Jotform)
RAG Technology Leadership: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, proprietary anti-hallucination mechanisms, and citation-backed responses
Benchmark Details
Deployment Flexibility: Cloud-hosted SaaS with auto-scaling, API integrations, embedded chat widgets, ChatGPT Plugin support, and hosted MCP Server for Claude/Cursor/ChatGPT
Enterprise Readiness: SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling, domain allowlisting, RBAC with 2FA/SSO, and flat-rate pricing without per-query charges
Use Case Fit: Ideal for organizations needing both rapid no-code deployment AND robust API capabilities, teams handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), and businesses requiring production-ready RAG without building ML infrastructure from scratch
Competitive Positioning: Bridges the gap between developer-first platforms (Cohere, Deepset) requiring heavy coding and no-code chatbot builders (Jotform, Kommunicate) lacking API depth - offers best of both worlds
Federated R A G ( F R A G™) Architecture ( Core Differentiator)
N/A
Proprietary 3-Layer Framework: Specifically designed for hallucination mitigation in enterprise knowledge retrieval
Federation Layer: Constructs 360-degree enterprise context by unifying data across all 100+ connected sources simultaneously
Retrieval Layer: Filters responses using keyword matching, semantic similarity, and vector search for comprehensive result accuracy
Augmented Generation Layer: Produces responses using neural networks with temperature-controlled creativity balancing accuracy and natural language
Vector Search Integration: Semantic embedding-based retrieval combined with traditional keyword matching for best-of-both-worlds accuracy
Prompt Optimization: Local retrieval enhances prompts with relevant context from federated sources before LLM submission
Multi-Repository Context: Documentation, forums, LMS, CRM, support tickets unified for comprehensive answer grounding
User Feedback Loops: Continuous improvement through response validation and audit mechanisms
Fallback Generation: Maintains service during LLM downtime with alternative response mechanisms
SUVA "World's First Federated RAG Chatbot": Analyzes 20+ attributes (customer history, similar cases, past resolutions) across federated enterprise sources
Competitive Advantage: Most RAG platforms focus on single-source or simple multi-source retrieval - FRAG™ explicitly designed for complex enterprise federation
N/A
100+ Pre- Built Connectors ( Differentiator)
N/A
Dramatically Reduced Integration Effort: Out-of-box connectors vs custom development required by many RAG platforms
CRM/Support Systems: Salesforce, ServiceNow, Zendesk, Dynamics 365, Help Scout with bi-directional sync
Collaboration Platforms: Slack, MS Teams, Confluence, Jira for internal knowledge aggregation
After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both Pyx and SearchUnify are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.
When to Choose Pyx
You value very quick setup (30-60 minutes)
No manual data imports required
Excellent ease of use with conversational interface
Best For: Very quick setup (30-60 minutes)
When to Choose SearchUnify
You value g2 leader for 21 consecutive quarters (5+ years) in enterprise search - exceptional market validation vs newer rag startups
Proprietary FRAG™ architecture specifically designed for hallucination mitigation with 3-layer federation, retrieval, augmented generation
100+ pre-built connectors dramatically reduce integration effort - Google Drive, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Zendesk, Slack, MS Teams, YouTube, Adobe AEM
Best For: G2 Leader for 21 consecutive quarters (5+ years) in Enterprise Search - exceptional market validation vs newer RAG startups
Migration & Switching Considerations
Switching between Pyx and SearchUnify requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.
Pricing Comparison Summary
Pyx starts at $30/month, while SearchUnify begins at custom pricing. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.
Our Recommendation Process
Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality
For most organizations, the decision between Pyx and SearchUnify comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.
📚 Next Steps
Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.
• Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
• Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
• Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
• Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements
Last updated: December 11, 2025 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.
The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.
DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.
People Also Compare
Explore more AI tool comparisons to find the perfect solution for your needs
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...