In this comprehensive guide, we compare Tidio and Yellow.ai across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.
Overview
When choosing between Tidio and Yellow.ai, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose Tidio if: you value exceptional ease of use: 4.7/5 g2 rating with 253 'ease of use' and 161 'easy setup' mentions
Choose Yellow.ai if: you value genuinely comprehensive 35+ channel coverage: whatsapp bsp, messenger, instagram, telegram, slack, teams, voice, sms
About Tidio
Tidio is no-code customer service automation with claude 3-powered ai chatbots. Customer service automation platform with Claude 3-powered Lyro AI achieving 67-90% resolution rates. Founded 2013 by Tytus Gołąs (Poland), serves 300,000+ businesses including Pizza Hut, Decathlon, Casio. NOT a RAG-as-a-Service platform—optimized for SMB/e-commerce no-code chatbot building with exceptional ease of use (4.7/5 G2, 1,600+ reviews). SOC 2 Type II + GDPR certified. Critical gaps: NO programmatic knowledge API, NO LLM model selection (Claude-only), NO cloud storage integrations. $0-$2,999+/month with per-conversation billing ($0.50/Lyro chat). Founded in 2013, headquartered in San Francisco, CA (offices in Szczecin and Warsaw, Poland), the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
87/100
Starting Price
$29/mo
About Yellow.ai
Yellow.ai is enterprise conversational ai platform with multi-llm orchestration. Enterprise conversational AI platform with embedded RAG capabilities processing 16 billion+ conversations annually. Multi-LLM orchestration across 35+ channels and 135+ languages with proprietary YellowG LLM claiming <1% hallucination rates. Founded in 2016, headquartered in San Mateo, CA, USA / Bengaluru, India, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
85/100
Starting Price
Custom
Key Differences at a Glance
In terms of user ratings, both platforms score similarly in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, Yellow.ai offers more competitive entry pricing. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: Customer Support versus Conversational AI. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.
⚠️ What This Comparison Covers
We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.
Detailed Feature Comparison
Tidio
Yellow.ai
CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
Website URL crawling: Primary method scanning up to 500 URLs (expandable on Plus plans) with automatic Q&A pair extraction from web content
PDF uploads: Direct file upload support for PDF documents
CSV imports: Maximum 500 entries per file, 10,000 total Q&A limit across all sources
Manual Q&A creation: Admin panel configuration for custom question-answer pairs
Zendesk Help Center: Article import via API (closest to external knowledge integration available)
Automatic weekly re-sync: Website source updates available only on Plus/Premium plans
Continuous Q&A suggestions: System suggests new pairs from unanswered questions and historical conversations requiring manual review before activation
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO Word document (DOCX) support, No NO TXT files, No NO Excel files, No NO YouTube transcript processing, No NO audio/video file support, No NO code file ingestion
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO native cloud storage integrations - Google Drive, Dropbox, Notion connect via Zapier for workflows only (NOT as knowledge sources)
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO programmatic knowledge upload API - all data ingestion requires UI-based management, blocking automation workflows
Scaling constraint: 10,000 Q&A entry limit caps knowledge base size vs unlimited in RAG platforms
Per-conversation billing: Averaging $0.50 per AI conversation limits cost-effective scaling for high-volume use cases
Document Cognition (DocCog) Engine: 75-85% accuracy depending on document complexity using T5 model fine-tuned on SQuAD/TriviaQA
Supported Formats: PDF, DOCX, DOC, PPTX, PPT, TXT via manual upload through platform UI only (no API upload)
Automatic Synchronization: Configurable intervals - hourly, daily, weekly for external knowledge base updates
Website Crawling: URL ingestion and sitemap.xml parsing for structured site content extraction
Missing Integrations: No Google Drive, Dropbox, or Notion support - significant gap vs competitors
YouTube Limitation: Transcript ingestion not natively supported
API Gap: No programmatic document upload or knowledge base management via API
Q&A Extraction: T5 model-based question-answer pair generation from ingested documents
Lets you ingest more than 1,400 file formats—PDF, DOCX, TXT, Markdown, HTML, and many more—via simple drag-and-drop or API.
Crawls entire sites through sitemaps and URLs, automatically indexing public help-desk articles, FAQs, and docs.
Turns multimedia into text on the fly: YouTube videos, podcasts, and other media are auto-transcribed with built-in OCR and speech-to-text.
View Transcription Guide
Connects to Google Drive, SharePoint, Notion, Confluence, HubSpot, and more through API connectors or Zapier.
See Zapier Connectors
Supports both manual uploads and auto-sync retraining, so your knowledge base always stays up to date.
Integrations & Channels
Omnichannel unified inbox: Website live chat, email ticketing, Facebook Messenger, Instagram DMs, WhatsApp Business API managed in single dashboard
Zapier integration: Connects to 8,000+ apps, available free on all plans for workflow automation
CRM integrations: Salesforce, HubSpot, Zendesk, Pipedrive for customer data sync
E-commerce platforms: Shopify (deep integration with order management, cart preview, product recommendations), WooCommerce, BigCommerce, Wix
Webhooks: Require Plus subscription ($749/month) for bidirectional data sync via Tray.io with real-time event notifications
Marketing tools: Google Analytics, Mailchimp, ActiveCampaign
CRITICAL GAPS: No NO native Slack integration (Zapier notifications only, not bidirectional chat), No NO Microsoft Teams integration, No NO Telegram native support (requires third-party Zapier/Make tools)
Competitive positioning: Deep Shopify/WooCommerce capabilities vs RAG platforms' generic web integrations position Tidio strongly for e-commerce use cases
No-code automation: Drag-and-drop interface for conversation flow creation without programming knowledge (253 G2 'Ease of Use' mentions)
40+ pre-built templates: Sales, lead generation, support scenarios reduce time-to-deployment for common use cases
Testing simulator: Validate flows before publishing with built-in emulation preventing production errors
Export/import functionality: Share flows between accounts or backup configurations for versioning
HTTP request support: GET, POST, PATCH, PUT, DELETE within chatbot automation supporting JSON, Text, GraphQL formats with multiple authentication methods
Target audience advantage: Non-technical business users can deploy chatbots in minutes vs developer-required platforms (9/10 rated differentiator for SMBs)
User feedback: G2 reviews cite 'Easy Setup' (161 mentions) and 'intuitive' workflow design as primary strengths
N/A
N/A
Core Agent Features
Lyro AI (Claude 3): 79-87% success rates (up from 50-70% pre-Claude 3 upgrade) with strict knowledge base boundaries preventing hallucinations
Lyro Guidance (beta): Tone customization (Neutral/Friendly/Formal), emoji toggles, source link display, custom escalation rules, communication style instructions
Human handoff: Transfer to unassigned queue, keep conversation with rephrasing, or create ticket with email follow-up - preserves full chat history and context
Smart Insights: AI-generated recommendations for improving metrics based on conversation analysis
Live visitor tracking: Real-time monitoring with typing preview and conversation takeover capabilities
45+ language support: Automatic browser-based detection with native multilingual processing (no internal English translation layer)
LIMITATION: No NO anti-hallucination controls beyond knowledge base boundaries - responses cannot be traced to source documents with citations (vs RAG platforms)
LIMITATION: No NO retrieval parameter configuration - users cannot adjust similarity thresholds, implement hybrid search, or configure confidence scoring
Massive Scale: 16 billion+ conversations processed annually across enterprise deployments
Multi-Lingual: 135+ languages supported with regional variants (Komodo-7B for 11+ Indonesian languages)
Hallucination Prevention: YellowG LLM claims <1% hallucination rate vs GPT-3's 22.7% in vendor benchmarks
Dynamic AI Agent: Zero-training deployment with automatic model routing and next-action determination
Multi-Intent Detection: Handles complex user queries with context-aware orchestration across conversation turns
Response Speed: 0.6-second average response time (YellowG LLM performance claim)
Automatic Guardrails: Policy compliance and response relevance filtering from deployment without manual configuration
Case Study Performance: Lulu Hypermarket 3M+ unique users in 4 weeks, Sony 21,000+ voice calls in 2 months
Custom AI Agents: Build autonomous agents powered by GPT-4 and Claude that can perform tasks independently and make real-time decisions based on business knowledge
Decision-Support Capabilities: AI agents analyze proprietary data to provide insights, recommendations, and actionable responses specific to your business domain
Multi-Agent Systems: Deploy multiple specialized AI agents that can collaborate and optimize workflows in areas like customer support, sales, and internal knowledge management
Memory & Context Management: Agents maintain conversation history and persistent context for coherent multi-turn interactions
View Agent Documentation
Tool Integration: Agents can trigger actions, integrate with external APIs via webhooks, and connect to 5,000+ apps through Zapier for automated workflows
Hyper-Accurate Responses: Leverages advanced RAG technology and retrieval mechanisms to deliver context-aware, citation-backed responses grounded in your knowledge base
Continuous Learning: Agents improve over time through automatic re-indexing of knowledge sources and integration of new data without manual retraining
Claude 3 A I Performance ( Differentiator)
Model selection rationale: Anthropic's Claude chosen for being "developed with the goal of becoming helpful, honest, and harmless" - explicit decision over GPT
Success rate improvement: Jumped from 50-70% to 79-87% after Claude 3 upgrade demonstrating significant model advancement
Customer automation rates: Case studies report 89-90% automation for well-configured implementations (Pizza Hut, Decathlon, Casio use cases)
Hallucination prevention: Strict knowledge base boundaries - Lyro answers only from provided sources and automatically escalates when uncertain
Privacy advantage: Anthropic processes conversations in-session only without saving data unnecessarily vs competitors using data for training
LIMITATION: No Fixed Claude 3 implementation - NO model switching, NO automatic routing, NO GPT/Gemini/custom model options (7/10 rated as limitation vs flexible RAG platforms)
N/A
N/A
Widget Customization & White- Labeling
Visual customization: Live editor with theme presets, color pickers (custom hex supported), logo uploads, position controls (left/right)
Light/dark modes: Built-in theme switching with automatic user preference detection
Custom CSS: Advanced styling via JavaScript SDK for design control beyond presets
Operating hours display: Show availability status to visitors automatically
Mobile responsiveness: Separate mobile widget settings with device-specific hiding options
Domain restrictions: Control which websites can embed widget through trusted domains configuration
Role-based access: Admin, Moderator, and Agent roles with configurable permissions (Growth+ plans) plus agent groups for departmental routing
White-labeling pricing: Note: $20/month addon on Growth tier OR included with Plus ($749+/month) - not available on Free/Starter
Custom avatars: Branded agent avatars and logos require Plus plans minimum
N/A
N/A
L L M Model Options
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No Claude 3 LLM ONLY - NO model selection or routing available
Proprietary implementation: Tidio uses Claude 3 combined with proprietary control mechanisms (not publicly documented architecture)
Fixed processing: Cannot switch between GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Gemini, Llama, or custom models based on query complexity or cost optimization
NO BYOLLM: No No bring-your-own-model capabilities for enterprise customization or fine-tuning
Response personalization: Limited to Lyro Guidance instructions (tone, emoji, escalation rules) rather than direct prompt engineering
Competitive gap: Eliminates LLM flexibility entirely vs RAG platforms offering multi-provider model selection (rated 3/10 for model flexibility - major architectural limitation)
Proprietary YellowG LLM: Claims <1% hallucination rate vs GPT-3's 22.7% (vendor benchmarks), 0.6s avg response time
Komodo-7B: Indonesia-focused with 11+ regional language variants for Southeast Asian market
T5 Fine-Tuned: SQuAD/TriviaQA training for Document Cognition Q&A extraction (75-85% accuracy)
GPT Integration: GPT-3 and GPT-3.5 integrations documented in platform materials
GPT-4/Claude: Support not explicitly confirmed in documentation - unclear availability
Dynamic Model Routing: Automatic selection via Dynamic AI Agent based on query complexity and context requirements
Enterprise Tuning: Proprietary models trained on anonymized customer interactions with PII masking at data layer
Focus: Enterprise-specific tuning prioritized over raw model access and flexibility
Abstracted Selection: Model routing handled automatically - minimal user control over specific model choice
Taps into top models—OpenAI’s GPT-5.1 series, GPT-4 series, and even Anthropic’s Claude for enterprise needs (4.5 opus and sonnet, etc ).
Automatically balances cost and performance by picking the right model for each request.
Model Selection Details
Uses proprietary prompt engineering and retrieval tweaks to return high-quality, citation-backed answers.
Handles all model management behind the scenes—no extra API keys or fine-tuning steps for you.
Developer Experience ( A P I & S D Ks)
Three API tiers: Widget SDK (tidioChatAPI - free), OpenAPI REST (Plus $749/month), Webhooks (Plus $749/month)
Widget SDK (free): Controls widget open/close, user identification, event tracking via JavaScript tidioChatAPI interface
OpenAPI (REST): Manages contacts, tickets, conversations, operators with 10-120 requests/minute based on plan (Starter/Growth: 10/min, Plus: 60/min, Premium: 120/min)
Webhooks (Plus+): Real-time event notifications for conversations, tickets, customer satisfaction with 10-second response timeouts
Mobile SDKs: iOS and Android with full Lyro AI support and 15-30 minute implementation time, customizable UI styling within apps
Documentation: developers.tidio.com (beta status) with code snippets and interactive testing but limited depth for advanced use cases
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO official SDKs for any programming language (Python, JavaScript, Node.js) - requires direct HTTP calls to REST API
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO programmatic knowledge management endpoints - cannot upload documents, manage Q&A pairs, or configure knowledge base via API
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO Lyro AI querying API - cannot trigger AI responses or access retrieval endpoints programmatically
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO RAG-specific APIs for semantic search, embedding management, chunking configuration, or retrieval parameters
Support gap: Tidio explicitly states 'cannot provide direct assistance with API implementations' - developer support severely limited
Platform-First Architecture: Designed for UI-based development with APIs serving supplementary functions (not primary access)
Available via API: User management (create/update/delete/list), event pushing for custom triggers, outbound notifications, webhook integrations
NOT Available via API: Bot/agent creation or management, document upload, knowledge base management, direct RAG query endpoints, embedding/vector store access, analytics data export
Mobile SDKs: Well-documented Android (Java), iOS (Swift), React Native, Flutter, Cordova with complete code examples, Postman collections, demo applications
Python SDK: Does not exist - major limitation for backend developers and data science teams
Web SDK: Script tag injection only (no npm package) - documentation criticized as incomplete by G2 reviewers
Rate Limits: Not publicly documented - no transparency for production capacity planning
OpenAPI Spec: Not published - no Swagger documentation for API exploration
Critical Limitation: Cannot use Yellow.ai as RAG backend - queries must flow through platform conversation flows vs direct API calls
Ships a well-documented REST API for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data, and querying chat.
API Documentation
Backs you up with cookbooks, code samples, and step-by-step guides for every skill level.
R A G Implementation & Accuracy
CRITICAL ARCHITECTURAL GAP: No NOT a RAG-as-a-Service platform - lacks vector databases, embedding controls, and configurable retrieval pipelines
Knowledge processing: Q&A extraction from URLs/PDFs/CSVs through opaque internal system without transparency into methodology
NO chunking parameters: No Chunk size, overlap, and strategy not exposed for optimization or tuning
NO embedding model selection: No Cannot choose between OpenAI, Cohere, or custom embedding models for vector generation
NO similarity threshold controls: No Cannot configure cosine similarity thresholds, retrieval scoring, or confidence levels
NO hybrid search: No No combination of keyword and semantic search strategies or BM25 integration
NO anti-hallucination mechanisms: No No citation attribution, source verification, or granular confidence scoring - responses cannot be traced to source documents
Hallucination prevention: Relies solely on strict knowledge base boundaries - Lyro answers only from provided sources and escalates when uncertain
Competitive positioning: Customer service automation platform, NOT autonomous knowledge retrieval system - fundamentally different architecture from RAG platforms (rated 2/10 as RAG platform)
N/A
N/A
Performance & Accuracy
Response time: Real-time chat delivery optimized for sub-second messaging; exact latency benchmarks not publicly disclosed but consistently praised for responsiveness in G2 reviews (4.7/5, 1,600+ reviews)
Accuracy metrics: 79-87% Lyro AI success rate after Claude 3 upgrade (up from 50-70% pre-upgrade); customer case studies report 89-90% automation rates for well-configured implementations (Pizza Hut, Decathlon, Casio)
Context retrieval: Q&A extraction from URLs/PDFs/CSVs with automatic knowledge base building; strict knowledge base boundaries prevent hallucinations; no configurable similarity thresholds or hybrid search strategies exposed
Scalability: 300,000+ businesses served globally demonstrating SMB/e-commerce market fit; infrastructure supports high-volume deployments but per-conversation pricing model ($0.50/Lyro chat) constrains cost scaling vs unlimited usage platforms
Reliability: SLA guarantees on Premium tier ($2,999+/month) with 50% resolution guarantee and uptime commitments; platform stability consistently praised in reviews with "reliable" as common theme
Benchmarks: No published performance benchmarks comparing retrieval speed, accuracy, or latency against competitors; Claude 3 upgrade validation through customer case studies (89-90% automation rates)
Quality indicators: G2 rating 4.7/5 (1,600+ reviews, 68% five-star ratings); users praise ease of use, Shopify integration, visual Flow Builder, but note analytics depth limitations and per-conversation pricing at scale
YellowG Hallucination Rate: Vendor claims <1% vs GPT-3's 22.7% (Yellow.ai internal benchmarks - no independent validation)
Response Latency: 0.6-second average response time (YellowG LLM performance claim)
Document Cognition: 75-85% accuracy depending on complexity (T5 model fine-tuned on SQuAD/TriviaQA)
Delivers sub-second replies with an optimized pipeline—efficient vector search, smart chunking, and caching.
Independent tests rate median answer accuracy at 5/5—outpacing many alternatives.
Benchmark Results
Always cites sources so users can verify facts on the spot.
Maintains speed and accuracy even for massive knowledge bases with tens of millions of words.
Customization & Branding
UI customization: Visual live editor with theme presets, color pickers supporting custom hex codes, logo uploads, position controls (left/right), operating hours display automatically showing availability status
Branding control: Light/dark mode built-in theme switching with automatic user preference detection, custom CSS via JavaScript SDK for advanced styling beyond presets
White-labeling: $20/month addon on Growth tier OR included with Plus ($749+/month); not available on Free/Starter plans; custom branded agent avatars and logos require Plus plans minimum
Custom domain: Not explicitly documented in public materials; likely requires Plus or Premium plan with custom deployment infrastructure (specifics require sales engagement)
Design flexibility: Separate mobile widget settings with device-specific hiding options, mobile responsiveness with mobile-specific configuration separate from web widget
Mobile customization: Responsive widget adapts to mobile devices; mobile-specific branding controls inherit desktop configuration; mobile app functionality limitations noted in user reviews
Domain restrictions: Control which websites can embed widget through trusted domains configuration for security
Role-based access: Admin, Moderator, and Agent roles with configurable permissions on Growth+ plans; agent groups for departmental routing enabling organizational structure
Visual Studio: Drag-and-drop conversation flow builder with no-code interface for business users
White-Labeling: Custom branding, domains, widget appearance on Enterprise plan
Orchestration Flows: Multi-checkpoint validation workflows with custom policy compliance rules
Regional Control: Customer-selected data residency across 6 regions (US, EU, Singapore, India, Indonesia, UAE)
RBAC: Six permission levels for granular access control across teams and departments
Widget Customization: JavaScript configuration for appearance, behavior, proactive triggers
PWA Customization: Progressive Web App with shareable links and custom branding for conversational landing pages
Webhook Integration: Custom workflow triggers and event-driven automation for external system connectivity
Fully white-labels the widget—colors, logos, icons, CSS, everything can match your brand.
White-label Options
Provides a no-code dashboard to set welcome messages, bot names, and visual themes.
Lets you shape the AI’s persona and tone using pre-prompts and system instructions.
Uses domain allowlisting to ensure the chatbot appears only on approved sites.
No- Code Interface & Usability
Visual builder: Drag-and-drop Flow Builder for conversation automation with NLP intent recognition; no programming knowledge required (253 G2 'Ease of Use' mentions)
Setup complexity: 2-minute JavaScript snippet installation for website embedding; consistently praised in reviews for "easy setup" (161 G2 mentions) and rapid deployment
Learning curve: G2 rating 4.7/5 (1,600+ reviews) with "intuitive" interface for non-technical users; designed for business teams without developer resources vs API-centric platforms
Pre-built templates: 40+ pre-built templates for sales, lead generation, support scenarios reducing time-to-deployment; templates include common conversation flows and automation patterns
No-code workflows: Testing simulator validates flows before publishing with built-in emulation preventing production errors; export/import functionality for sharing flows between accounts or backup configurations
User experience: Lyro knowledge setup through simple URL or file upload with AI extracting Q&A pairs automatically - no technical skills required for configuration; HTTP request support (GET, POST, PATCH, PUT, DELETE) within chatbot automation supporting JSON, Text, GraphQL formats with multiple authentication methods
Competitive advantage: SMBs and non-technical teams deploy chatbots in minutes vs hours/days in API-centric platforms (9.5/10 rated differentiator for ease of use)
Visual Studio: Drag-and-drop conversation flow builder positioned as "no-code" platform
Dynamic AI Agent: Zero-training deployment with automatic model routing reduces manual configuration
Multi-Intent Detection: Automatic handling of complex queries without manual flow definition
Pre-Built Templates: Industry-specific conversation templates for faster deployment
Channel Configuration: Guided setup for 35+ messaging and voice channel integrations
Knowledge Management UI: Manual document upload and external system connection configuration
Policy Builder: Visual configuration for multi-checkpoint validation rules and guardrails
RBAC Management: Six permission levels with team access control configuration
Offers a wizard-style web dashboard so non-devs can upload content, brand the widget, and monitor performance.
Supports drag-and-drop uploads, visual theme editing, and in-browser chatbot testing.
User Experience Review
Uses role-based access so business users and devs can collaborate smoothly.
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 Type II: Achieved October 2025 through A-LIGN audit covering Security, Availability, and Confidentiality trust criteria
GDPR Compliant: May 2018 certification with designated Data Protection Officer and full subject rights support (access, rectification, erasure, portability)
AWS infrastructure: All customer data resides on AWS in EEA member countries for European data sovereignty
Encryption: TLS 1.2+ with 256-bit SSL for transit, AES-256 for data at rest, irreversible password hashing (no plaintext storage)
Two-factor authentication: TOTP-based 2FA available on all plans for account security
Role-based access control: Admin, Moderator, and Agent roles with configurable permissions on Growth+ plans
SSO: Single sign-on on Enterprise plans for centralized identity management
30-day audit logs: Available on Business plan for compliance tracking and security monitoring
AI data privacy: Lyro conversations NOT used for training public AI models - Anthropic's Claude processes in-session only without persistent data storage
LIMITATION: No NO HIPAA certification - SOC 2 Type II + GDPR only (Tidio indicates working toward healthcare compliance but no timeline)
SOC 2 Type II: Independently audited security controls and compliance certification
ISO Certifications: ISO 27001 (Information Security), ISO 27018 (Cloud Privacy), ISO 27701 (Privacy Management)
HIPAA Compliant: Suitable for healthcare use cases requiring protected health information handling
GDPR Compliant: Data protection and privacy rights for European users
PCI DSS Certified: Payment card industry data security standard compliance for financial transactions
FedRAMP Authorized: Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program for US government deployments
Encryption: AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.3 in transit for maximum data protection
Regional Data Centers: US, EU, Singapore, India, Indonesia, UAE with customer-selected data residency
SSO/SAML: Integration with Google, Microsoft, Azure AD, LDAP for enterprise identity management
RBAC: Six permission levels for granular access control across teams
IP Whitelisting: Network-level access restrictions for enhanced security
Audit Logs: 15-day retention for API activity tracking and compliance reporting
On-Premise Options: Private cloud and on-premise deployment for complete data sovereignty
Agent-level performance: Individual response times, handled conversation counts, workload distribution for team optimization
Real-time monitoring: Live visitor lists, typing preview, conversation takeover capabilities for immediate intervention
Lyro-specific analytics: Resolution rates, unanswered questions tracking, knowledge base gap identification for continuous improvement
Smart Insights: AI-generated recommendations for metric improvement based on conversation pattern analysis
Scheduled reports: Daily/weekly/monthly delivery via email with CSV export for custom analysis in external tools
LIMITATION: Note: Analytics depth falls short of enterprise expectations - users report 'helpful but not as detailed as enterprise tools' with limited funnel and flow-level analytics
LIMITATION: No NO AI performance metrics - no retrieval accuracy dashboards, semantic search performance tracking, hallucination rate monitoring (focuses on operational metrics)
Analytics Dashboard: Comprehensive conversation metrics, user engagement tracking across 35+ channels
Deflection Metrics: Automation success rates and ticket deflection measurement
Voice Analytics: IVR and telephony integration performance tracking
Audit Logs: 15-day retention for API activity with compliance reporting capabilities
Case Study Benchmarks: Lulu Hypermarket 3M+ unique users in 4 weeks, Sony 21,000+ calls in 2 months
45+ languages: English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Norwegian, Polish, plus 35+ additional languages
Native processing: Lyro processes data sources directly in original language without internal English translation layer (reduces accuracy loss)
Automatic browser detection: Switches widget to visitor locale based on browser settings for seamless user experience
Multiple language packs: Allow department routing to language-specific teams for specialized support
Language limiting: Administrators can restrict which languages Lyro uses and set fallback behaviors for unsupported languages
20+ pre-translated packs: Chat widget language packs with manual translation options for additional coverage
Global reach advantage: Single knowledge base serves multiple languages vs competitors requiring separate configurations per locale (7.5/10 rated differentiator)
Plus: $749/month - Custom billable (2,000+ conversations), up to 5,000 Lyro conversations, API access, webhooks, white-labeling, Customer Success Manager
Premium: $2,999+/month - Unlimited billable conversations, up to 10,000 Lyro conversations, 50% resolution guarantee, SLAs, unlimited operators
Per-conversation billing: Lyro AI costs approximately $0.50 per conversation (1 conversation = 1 customer interaction with AI reply, auto-closes after 15 minutes inactivity)
10-operator cap: Note: All self-serve plans (Free through Plus) limited to 10 operators - unlimited seats require Premium tier ($2,999+/month)
API access locked: Note: OpenAPI and Webhooks require Plus plan minimum ($749/month) - unavailable on Free/Starter/Growth tiers
White-labeling cost: Note: $20/month addon on Growth tier OR included with Plus ($749+/month)
Annual savings: ~20% discount when paying annually vs monthly billing
Cost scaling concern: Per-conversation model at $0.50/Lyro chat escalates costs at high volume vs unlimited usage in RAG platforms
Knowledge base: Self-service articles and video tutorials for common setup and troubleshooting scenarios
User satisfaction: 4.7/5 G2 rating (1,600+ reviews) with support quality consistently praised
LIMITATION: No NO public community forums or user groups for peer support and knowledge sharing
LIMITATION: No NO phone support available on any tier (chat and email only)
Developer support gap: Tidio explicitly states 'cannot provide direct assistance with API implementations' - technical support severely limited for custom integrations
Multi-Channel Support: Email, chat, phone support with tier-based access levels
Enterprise Support: Dedicated customer success managers, priority support, SLA guarantees on Enterprise plan
Implementation Services: Professional services included with typical 4-month deployment timeline
Documentation: Available at docs.yellow.ai with API references, mobile SDK guides, Postman collections
Training & Onboarding: Included in enterprise packages with dedicated resources
Community Forums: Available for peer support and knowledge sharing
G2 Feedback: Mixed support quality post-onboarding noted by reviewers, documentation gaps cited
Gartner Recognition: Magic Quadrant 'Challenger' status (2023/2025) provides analyst validation
Customer Base: Enterprise brands including Sony, Domino's, Hyundai, Volkswagen, Ferrellgas across 85+ countries
Learning Curve: Steep curve noted - one G2 reviewer: "Setup felt akin to solving a Rubik's cube blindfolded"
Developer Resources: Mobile SDK documentation praised, web SDK documentation criticized as incomplete
Supplies rich docs, tutorials, cookbooks, and FAQs to get you started fast.
Developer Docs
Offers quick email and in-app chat support—Premium and Enterprise plans add dedicated managers and faster SLAs.
Enterprise Solutions
Benefits from an active user community plus integrations through Zapier and GitHub resources.
R A G-as-a- Service Assessment
Platform classification: CUSTOMER SERVICE AUTOMATION PLATFORM with AI assistance, NOT a RAG-as-a-Service platform
Architecture philosophy: Designed for no-code chatbot building and agent productivity enhancement, not autonomous knowledge retrieval
Target audience: SMBs and e-commerce businesses needing easy chatbot deployment vs developers requiring programmatic RAG control
Missing RAG foundations: NO vector database, NO embedding controls, NO LLM model selection, NO anti-hallucination mechanisms, NO retrieval configuration APIs
Knowledge source gap: Limited to URLs, PDFs, CSVs (max 10,000 Q&A entries) vs 1,400+ formats and unlimited scaling in RAG platforms
API focus: Chat operations (contacts, tickets, conversations) vs RAG operations (semantic search, retrieval, embeddings, chunking)
Use case fit: Excellent for SMB customer service automation and e-commerce support, inappropriate for enterprise-scale document retrieval requiring accuracy controls
Competitive positioning: Different category from CustomGPT - customer service automation vs RAG-as-a-Service (rated 2/10 as RAG platform - fundamentally different architecture)
Platform Type: NOT A RAG-AS-A-SERVICE PLATFORM - Full-stack enterprise conversational AI with embedded RAG
Critical Distinction: RAG functions as embedded feature, not exposed API service - cannot use Yellow.ai purely as knowledge/RAG backend
Document Cognition: 75-85% accuracy with T5 model fine-tuned on SQuAD/TriviaQA for Q&A extraction
Knowledge Architecture: Closed system - no direct RAG query endpoints, embedding access, or vector store API
API Limitations: No programmatic document upload, knowledge base management, or direct retrieval capabilities
Query Flow: Queries must flow through platform conversation flows vs direct API calls to knowledge backend
Core Architecture: Serverless RAG infrastructure with automatic embedding generation, vector search optimization, and LLM orchestration fully managed behind API endpoints
API-First Design: Comprehensive REST API with well-documented endpoints for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data (1,400+ formats), and querying chat
API Documentation
Developer Experience: Open-source Python SDK (customgpt-client), Postman collections, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, and extensive cookbooks for rapid integration
No-Code Alternative: Wizard-style web dashboard enables non-developers to upload content, brand widgets, and deploy chatbots without touching code
Hybrid Target Market: Serves both developer teams wanting robust APIs AND business users seeking no-code RAG deployment - unique positioning vs pure API platforms (Cohere) or pure no-code tools (Jotform)
RAG Technology Leadership: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, proprietary anti-hallucination mechanisms, and citation-backed responses
Benchmark Details
Deployment Flexibility: Cloud-hosted SaaS with auto-scaling, API integrations, embedded chat widgets, ChatGPT Plugin support, and hosted MCP Server for Claude/Cursor/ChatGPT
Enterprise Readiness: SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling, domain allowlisting, RBAC with 2FA/SSO, and flat-rate pricing without per-query charges
Use Case Fit: Ideal for organizations needing both rapid no-code deployment AND robust API capabilities, teams handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), and businesses requiring production-ready RAG without building ML infrastructure from scratch
Competitive Positioning: Bridges the gap between developer-first platforms (Cohere, Deepset) requiring heavy coding and no-code chatbot builders (Jotform, Kommunicate) lacking API depth - offers best of both worlds
Competitive Positioning
vs CustomGPT: Tidio excels in no-code ease of use and e-commerce integration; CustomGPT excels in RAG architecture and programmatic control
vs Intercom/LiveChat/Zendesk: Tidio competes in customer service automation with comparable features, lower pricing, stronger Shopify integration
vs Drift: Both focus on conversational automation - Tidio emphasizes SMB/e-commerce support, Drift emphasizes enterprise sales teams
vs RAG platforms (Vectara, Pinecone Assistant, Ragie): Fundamentally different architecture - Tidio not designed for autonomous retrieval, lacks RAG infrastructure
Market niche: No-code customer service automation for SMBs and e-commerce with exceptional ease of use (4.7/5 G2), NOT a RAG alternative for knowledge retrieval
Primary Advantage: Complete enterprise conversational AI platform with unmatched 35+ channel coverage and 135+ language support
Compliance Leadership: SOC 2, ISO 27001/27018/27701, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, FedRAMP exceeds most AI platform competitors
Proprietary Innovation: YellowG LLM claims <1% hallucination rate, Komodo-7B for Indonesia, 0.6s response times (vendor benchmarks)
Proven Scale: 16 billion+ conversations annually, customers include Sony, Domino's, Hyundai, Volkswagen across 85+ countries
Regional Strength: Multi-region data centers (US, EU, Singapore, India, Indonesia, UAE) with Komodo-7B for Southeast Asia
Primary Challenge: NOT a RAG-as-a-Service platform - embedded RAG within closed conversational system blocks API-first use cases
Developer Friction: No Python SDK, no knowledge base API, no dedicated RAG endpoints, web SDK documentation gaps
Pricing Barrier: ~$10K-$25K annual minimum with 4-month implementation vs competitors with sub-$100/month self-service tiers
Learning Curve: G2 reviews cite steep complexity - "setup felt akin to solving a Rubik's cube blindfolded"
Market Position: Competes with enterprise CX platforms (Genesys, Twilio, LivePerson) vs RAG API services (CustomGPT.ai, Pinecone Assistant)
Use Case Fit: Exceptional for enterprises needing omnichannel CX automation at scale; poor fit for developers seeking programmable RAG capabilities
Architectural Mismatch: Platform-first vs API-first design makes direct RAG platform comparison fundamentally misleading
Market position: Leading all-in-one RAG platform balancing enterprise-grade accuracy with developer-friendly APIs and no-code usability for rapid deployment
Target customers: Mid-market to enterprise organizations needing production-ready AI assistants, development teams wanting robust APIs without building RAG infrastructure, and businesses requiring 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription (YouTube, podcasts)
Key competitors: OpenAI Assistants API, Botsonic, Chatbase.co, Azure AI, and custom RAG implementations using LangChain
Competitive advantages: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling included, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, hosted MCP Server support (Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT), generous data limits (60M words Standard, 300M Premium), and flat monthly pricing without per-query charges
Pricing advantage: Transparent flat-rate pricing at $99/month (Standard) and $449/month (Premium) with generous included limits; no hidden costs for API access, branding removal, or basic features; best value for teams needing both no-code dashboard and developer APIs in one platform
Use case fit: Ideal for businesses needing both rapid no-code deployment and robust API capabilities, organizations handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), teams requiring white-label chatbots with source citations for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects, and companies wanting all-in-one RAG without managing ML infrastructure
Customer Base & Case Studies
Scale: 300,000+ businesses served globally demonstrating SMB/e-commerce market fit
Named customers: Pizza Hut (89-90% automation rates), Decathlon, Casio (enterprise validation)
WordPress adoption: 60,000+ plugin installations demonstrate strong small business penetration
User satisfaction: 4.7/5 G2 rating (1,600+ reviews) with 68% five-star ratings
Review themes - Praise: Ease of use (253 mentions), easy setup (161 mentions), Shopify integration, visual Flow Builder, responsive support
Review themes - Criticisms: Analytics depth limitations, per-conversation pricing at scale, API access locked to Plus tier ($749/month), 10-operator cap on self-serve plans
Claude 3 upgrade impact: Success rates jumped from 50-70% to 79-87% with customer case studies reporting 89-90% automation after upgrade
N/A
N/A
Company Background
Founding: 2013 by Tytus Gołąs in Poland (12+ years of platform development and refinement)
Customer base: 300,000+ businesses globally with focus on SMBs and e-commerce segment
Market positioning: No-code customer service automation leader for small-to-medium businesses vs enterprise-focused competitors
Product evolution: Claude 3 integration (recent upgrade from earlier models) demonstrates commitment to AI advancement
Geographic focus: Global SaaS distribution with strong European presence and EEA data residency compliance
Compliance achievement: SOC 2 Type II certification (October 2025) demonstrates enterprise security maturity despite SMB focus
N/A
N/A
Additional Considerations
Platform Classification: CUSTOMER SERVICE AUTOMATION PLATFORM with AI assistance, NOT a RAG-as-a-Service platform - designed for no-code chatbot building and agent productivity
Target Audience Fit: SMBs and e-commerce businesses needing easy chatbot deployment without developer dependency vs enterprises requiring programmatic RAG control
Primary Strength: Exceptional ease of use (4.7/5 G2, 253 'Ease of Use' mentions) with Visual Flow Builder enabling non-technical teams to deploy chatbots in minutes vs hours/days in API-centric platforms
Claude 3 AI Performance: 79-87% success rates (up from 50-70% pre-Claude 3 upgrade) with customer case studies reporting 89-90% automation for well-configured implementations (Pizza Hut, Decathlon, Casio)
Multilingual Excellence: 45+ languages with native processing (no internal English translation layer) and automatic browser detection reduces accuracy loss vs translation-based competitors
Shopify Integration Depth: Order management, cart preview/recovery, product catalog access directly from chat interface - 60,000+ WordPress installations validate e-commerce market fit
CRITICAL LIMITATION - NOT a RAG Platform: Missing RAG foundations (NO vector database, NO embedding controls, NO LLM model selection, NO anti-hallucination mechanisms, NO retrieval configuration APIs)
CRITICAL LIMITATION - Knowledge Source Gap: Limited to URLs, PDFs, CSVs with 10,000 Q&A entry limit vs unlimited documents and 1,400+ formats in RAG platforms
CRITICAL LIMITATION - Fixed Claude 3 Model: NO model selection, routing, or BYOLLM capabilities - eliminates LLM flexibility entirely (rated 3/10 for model flexibility)
API Limitations: OpenAPI and Webhooks require Plus plan minimum ($749/month) - unavailable on Free/Starter/Growth tiers limiting integration options
Cost Scaling Concern: Per-conversation model at $0.50/Lyro chat escalates quickly at high volume (1,000 AI conversations = $500/month) vs unlimited usage platforms
10-Operator Cap: All self-serve plans limited to 10 operators until Premium tier ($2,999+/month) restricting team scalability for growing businesses
Use Case Mismatch: Excellent for SMB customer service automation and e-commerce support; inappropriate for enterprise-scale document retrieval requiring accuracy controls
Platform Classification: ENTERPRISE CONVERSATIONAL AI PLATFORM with RAG capabilities, NOT a pure RAG-as-a-Service API platform - emphasis on multi-channel automation and workflow orchestration
Target Audience: Mid-market to enterprise organizations (1,000+ employees) with complex conversational workflows vs individual developers or SMBs requiring simple knowledge retrieval
Primary Strength: Exceptional for enterprise-grade conversational AI across 35+ channels (WhatsApp, voice, web, social) with 150+ language support and 60%+ automation rates in regulated industries
Vertical Expertise: 50% customer concentration in financial services with deep BFSI (Banking, Financial Services, Insurance) domain knowledge and compliance capabilities (PCI DSS, SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA)
Voice AI Excellence: Real-time voice agents in 50+ languages with sentiment analysis, IVR integration, call center deflection capabilities differentiate from text-only RAG platforms
CRITICAL LIMITATION - Enterprise Sales Motion: Custom pricing requires sales engagement (2-6 week cycle) with no self-serve option - unsuitable for quick testing or developer experimentation
CRITICAL LIMITATION - Pricing Opacity: No published pricing, user reviews report costs 'much higher than competitors', estimated $1,500-$3,500/month minimum vs $99-$299 in RAG platforms
CRITICAL LIMITATION - Implementation Complexity: 8-12 week implementation timelines common with mandatory professional services vs instant deployment in self-serve platforms
Developer API Limitations: APIs oriented toward conversation orchestration vs programmatic RAG operations (semantic search, embedding controls, retrieval configuration)
Lock-In Concerns: Heavy professional services dependency and complex multi-system integrations create significant switching costs vs API-first RAG platforms
Use Case Mismatch: Exceptional for large-scale enterprise conversational AI deployments across multiple channels; inappropriate for simple document Q&A or developer-centric RAG use cases
Slashes engineering overhead with an all-in-one RAG platform—no in-house ML team required.
Gets you to value quickly: launch a functional AI assistant in minutes.
Stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements, so you’re always on the latest tech.
Balances top-tier accuracy with ease of use, perfect for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects.
Core Chatbot Features
Lyro AI (Claude 3): 79-87% success rates (up from 50-70% pre-Claude 3 upgrade) with strict knowledge base boundaries preventing hallucinations beyond provided sources
Lyro Guidance (beta): Tone customization (Neutral/Friendly/Formal), emoji toggles, source link display, custom escalation rules, communication style instructions for brand voice consistency
Human Handoff Logic: Transfer to unassigned queue, keep conversation with rephrasing, or create ticket with email follow-up - preserves full chat history and context for seamless transitions
Smart Insights: AI-generated recommendations for improving metrics based on conversation pattern analysis - identifies optimization opportunities automatically
Live Visitor Tracking: Real-time monitoring with typing preview and conversation takeover capabilities for immediate human intervention when needed
45+ Language Support: Automatic browser-based detection with native multilingual processing (no internal English translation layer reduces accuracy loss)
Visual Flow Builder: Drag-and-drop interface for conversation flows with intent detection nodes, entity extraction, event triggers, variable management, memory retention
NO Anti-Hallucination Controls: Responses cannot be traced to source documents with citations - no citation attribution, source verification, or granular confidence scoring vs RAG platforms
NO Retrieval Parameter Configuration: Users cannot adjust similarity thresholds, implement hybrid search, configure confidence scoring, or tune retrieval mechanisms
Multi-Turn Conversations: Super Agent maintains conversation context across turns with intent detection, entity extraction, slot filling, and dialogue state management
150+ Language Support: Automatic language detection with native multilingual processing across all 150+ supported languages reducing accuracy loss vs translation-based systems
Human Handoff: Configurable escalation triggers with full conversation history transfer, agent workload balancing, queue management, and SLA tracking
Analytics & Insights: Comprehensive dashboards with containment rates, CSAT scores, conversation flows, drop-off points, user journey analytics, and business KPI tracking
Agent Performance Monitoring: Bot accuracy scoring, user satisfaction metrics, conversation success rates, A/B testing capabilities for continuous improvement
Voice AI Capabilities: Real-time voice agents in 50+ languages with sentiment analysis during calls, IVR integration, call deflection, automated transcription
Lead Capture & Qualification: Real-time lead scoring, CRM integration (Salesforce, HubSpot, Zoho), automatic contact creation, lead routing based on firmographics
Safety & Conduct Controls: Configurable filters ensuring ethical communication, avoiding harmful topics, handling sensitive data responsibly with compliance guardrails
Conversational Behavior Rules: Define conversation rules guiding agent responses in different situations ensuring consistent interactions across channels and use cases
Reduces hallucinations by grounding replies in your data and adding source citations for transparency.
Benchmark Details
Handles multi-turn, context-aware chats with persistent history and solid conversation management.
Speaks 90+ languages, making global rollouts straightforward.
Includes extras like lead capture (email collection) and smooth handoff to a human when needed.
Knowledge Base Building: URL crawling (500 URLs expandable on Plus), PDF uploads, CSV imports (max 500 entries/file, 10,000 total Q&A limit), manual Q&A creation, Zendesk Help Center article import
Automatic Weekly Re-Sync: Website source updates available on Plus/Premium plans ensuring knowledge stays current without manual refresh
Continuous Q&A Suggestions: System suggests new pairs from unanswered questions and historical conversations requiring manual review before activation
Behavior Customization: Lyro Guidance enables tone (Neutral/Friendly/Formal), emoji toggles, escalation rules, communication style instructions without coding requirements
Visual Flow Builder: No-code workflow creation with real-time testing simulator, one-click deployment, automatic versioning with rollback capabilities for rapid iteration
HTTP Request Support: GET, POST, PATCH, PUT, DELETE within chatbot automation supporting JSON, Text, GraphQL formats with multiple authentication methods
40+ Pre-Built Templates: Sales, lead generation, support scenarios reduce time-to-deployment with industry-specific conversation flows
Widget Customization: Visual live editor with theme presets, color pickers (custom hex), logo uploads, position controls (left/right), operating hours display
CRITICAL LIMITATION - Opaque Q&A Extraction: Knowledge processing methodology not publicly documented - no transparency into chunking strategies, embedding models, or retrieval mechanisms
CRITICAL LIMITATION - NO Programmatic Knowledge API: Cannot upload documents, manage Q&A pairs, or configure knowledge base via API - all data ingestion requires UI-based management
CRITICAL LIMITATION - 10,000 Q&A Entry Limit: Hard cap on knowledge base size vs unlimited in RAG platforms constrains large-scale deployments
Agent Profile & Persona: Configure name, role, scope, tone (formal/friendly/witty), communication style, expertise areas defining core agent identity
Conversation Rules: Define custom rules guiding agent behavior in specific situations ensuring consistent interactions and brand voice compliance
Welcome Messages & Greetings: Personalized welcome messages for different channels, user segments, and conversation contexts with dynamic variable substitution
Fallback Behaviors: Configurable responses for knowledge gaps, API failures, validation errors, low-confidence scenarios with escalation path options
Multi-KB Support: Multiple knowledge bases per organization with role-based access, departmental segregation, and cross-KB search capabilities
Auto-Reindexing: Automatic knowledge base refresh when source content changes in connected systems ensuring always-current information
Dynamic Prompt Engineering: Custom system prompts, temperature controls, response length limits, creativity settings configurable per use case
Channel-Specific Customization: Different agent behaviors, response formats, media handling per channel (WhatsApp, voice, web, email)
CRITICAL LIMITATION - Opaque RAG Implementation: Retrieval mechanisms, embedding models, chunking strategies, similarity thresholds not exposed for developer configuration
CRITICAL LIMITATION - NO Programmatic Knowledge API: Knowledge base management requires UI interaction - no API for document upload, embedding updates, or retrieval tuning
Lets you add, remove, or tweak content on the fly—automatic re-indexing keeps everything current.
Shapes agent behavior through system prompts and sample Q&A, ensuring a consistent voice and focus.
Learn How to Update Sources
Supports multiple agents per account, so different teams can have their own bots.
Balances hands-on control with smart defaults—no deep ML expertise required to get tailored behavior.
A I Models
Fixed Claude 3 implementation: Lyro AI exclusively powered by Anthropic's Claude 3 with proprietary control mechanisms - no model selection available
Model selection rationale: Claude chosen for being "developed with the goal of becoming helpful, honest, and harmless" - explicit decision prioritizing safety over GPT alternatives
Success rate improvement: 79-87% automation rate after Claude 3 upgrade (up from 50-70% with pre-Claude 3 models) demonstrating significant performance gains
Customer automation rates: Case studies report 89-90% automation for well-configured implementations (Pizza Hut, Decathlon, Casio validation)
CRITICAL LIMITATION: NO model switching: Cannot switch between GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Gemini, Llama, or custom models based on query complexity or cost optimization needs
CRITICAL LIMITATION: NO BYOLLM: No bring-your-own-model capabilities for enterprise customization or fine-tuning on proprietary data
CRITICAL LIMITATION: NO automatic routing: No intelligent model routing, fallback strategies, or load balancing across different LLM providers
Response personalization limits: Customization restricted to Lyro Guidance instructions (tone, emoji, escalation rules) rather than direct prompt engineering or system prompts
Competitive gap: Eliminates LLM flexibility entirely vs RAG platforms offering multi-provider model selection (rated 3/10 for model flexibility - major architectural limitation)
Proprietary YellowG LLM: Custom-trained model with vendor-claimed <1% hallucination rate vs GPT-3's 22.7%, 0.6-second average response time
Komodo-7B: Specialized Indonesia-focused model supporting 11+ regional language variants for Southeast Asian market dominance
Orchestrator LLM: Context switching and multi-intent detection engine with zero-training deployment capability
T5 Fine-Tuned: SQuAD/TriviaQA trained model for Document Cognition with 75-85% accuracy depending on complexity
GPT-3 & GPT-3.5: Integration documented for supplemental processing and model routing
15+ LLM Models: Multi-model architecture combining proprietary and third-party models for optimal task routing
Dynamic Model Routing: Automatic selection based on query complexity, language requirements, and performance optimization
Note: GPT-4/Claude support not explicitly confirmed - availability unclear in documentation
Enterprise Training: Models trained on 16 billion+ anonymized customer conversations with PII masking at data layer
Limited Flexibility: Users cannot manually select models - system handles routing automatically without direct control
Primary models: GPT-5.1 and 4 series from OpenAI, and Anthropic's Claude 4.5 (opus and sonnet) for enterprise needs
Automatic model selection: Balances cost and performance by automatically selecting the appropriate model for each request
Model Selection Details
Proprietary optimizations: Custom prompt engineering and retrieval enhancements for high-quality, citation-backed answers
Managed infrastructure: All model management handled behind the scenes - no API keys or fine-tuning required from users
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms ensure chatbot only answers based on provided content, improving trust and factual accuracy
R A G Capabilities
CRITICAL ARCHITECTURAL GAP: NOT a RAG-as-a-Service platform: Lacks vector databases, embedding controls, and configurable retrieval pipelines found in true RAG systems
Q&A extraction system: Automatic Q&A pair generation from URLs/PDFs/CSVs through opaque internal processing - methodology not publicly documented
Knowledge base boundaries: Strict knowledge base boundaries prevent hallucinations - Lyro answers only from provided sources and automatically escalates when uncertain
NO chunking parameters exposed: Chunk size, overlap strategy, and chunking methodology not accessible for optimization or tuning
NO embedding model selection: Cannot choose between OpenAI, Cohere, custom embedding models, or configure embedding dimensions
NO similarity threshold controls: Cannot configure cosine similarity thresholds, retrieval scoring, confidence levels, or top-k results
NO hybrid search: No combination of keyword (BM25) and semantic search strategies or configurable weighting between approaches
NO anti-hallucination mechanisms: No citation attribution, source verification, or granular confidence scoring - responses cannot be traced to specific source documents
NO retrieval APIs: No programmatic access to semantic search, embedding management, or retrieval endpoints - knowledge management UI-only
Competitive positioning: Customer service automation platform with AI assistance, NOT autonomous knowledge retrieval system - fundamentally different architecture from RAG platforms (rated 2/10 as RAG platform)
Agentic RAG Architecture: Multi-checkpoint validation combining intelligent retrieval with reasoning and action - Yellow.ai's AI Agents don't just retrieve, they think, act, and learn
Document Cognition (DocCog): T5 model-based Q&A extraction with 75-85% accuracy depending on document complexity
Hallucination Prevention: Proprietary YellowG LLM approach with vendor-claimed <1% rate vs industry averages through training optimization
Automatic Guardrails: Policy compliance and response filtering from deployment without manual configuration requirements
Knowledge Synchronization: Configurable intervals (hourly, daily, weekly) for external sources including Salesforce, ServiceNow, Confluence, SharePoint
Website Crawling: URL ingestion and sitemap.xml parsing for structured site content extraction and Q&A generation
Enterprise Integrations: Bi-directional sync with AWS S3, Prismic, and major enterprise knowledge bases
Note: Closed Architecture: RAG embedded within platform - no direct endpoints, embedding customization, or vector store API access for developers
Note: No API Upload: Document upload requires manual platform UI interaction - cannot programmatically manage knowledge base
Core architecture: GPT-4 combined with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology, outperforming OpenAI in RAG benchmarks
RAG Performance
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms reduce hallucinations and ensure responses are grounded in provided content
Benchmark Details
Automatic citations: Each response includes clickable citations pointing to original source documents for transparency and verification
Optimized pipeline: Efficient vector search, smart chunking, and caching for sub-second reply times
Scalability: Maintains speed and accuracy for massive knowledge bases with tens of millions of words
Context-aware conversations: Multi-turn conversations with persistent history and comprehensive conversation management
Source verification: Always cites sources so users can verify facts on the spot
Use Cases
SMB customer service automation: Perfect for small-to-medium businesses needing easy chatbot deployment for basic support queries (4.7/5 G2 rating, 1,600+ reviews)
E-commerce support: Deep Shopify/WooCommerce integration for order management, cart recovery, and product recommendations - 60,000+ WordPress installations demonstrate e-commerce fit
Multi-channel support: Unified inbox for website live chat, Facebook Messenger, Instagram DMs, WhatsApp Business API, email ticketing (omnichannel deployment)
No-code chatbot building: Visual Flow Builder with 40+ templates enables non-technical teams to deploy chatbots in minutes without developer resources
Lead generation and qualification: Capture visitor information, qualify leads through conversation flows, sync to CRM platforms (Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive)
NOT ideal for: Enterprise-scale document retrieval requiring accuracy controls, RAG applications needing semantic search and embedding configuration, or knowledge-intensive use cases requiring citation validation
NOT ideal for: Organizations requiring programmatic knowledge management APIs, LLM model flexibility (GPT-4/Gemini switching), or advanced RAG features (hybrid search, reranking, query expansion)
NOT ideal for: High-volume automation (per-conversation pricing at $0.50/chat escalates costs vs unlimited usage platforms), teams needing more than 10 operators (Premium tier required at $2,999+/month)
Customer Service Automation: 90% query automation across 35+ channels with 60% operational cost reduction - handles 16 billion+ conversations annually
Employee Experience (EX): IT support automation (password resets, hardware requests), HR policy FAQs, leave applications, pay slip access, conference room bookings with rapid response delivery even in low bandwidth environments
24/7 Support Operations: Minimal human involvement for routine queries, autonomous account issue resolution, transaction execution, multi-department coordination with full context preservation
E-commerce & Retail: Personal shopping assistance (inventory browsing, price comparison, order placement, returns handling), real-time transaction monitoring with suspicious activity blocking
Travel & Hospitality: Booking management for travel, hotels, restaurants with automatic rebooking during disruptions and 24/7 availability
Financial Services: Fraud detection workflows with automated investigation initiation and PCI DSS compliance for payment transactions
Healthcare: HIPAA-compliant patient engagement and support with protected health information handling capabilities
Government & Federal: FedRAMP authorized platform for US federal deployments with complete compliance and security requirements
Real-World Results: Lulu Hypermarket 3M+ unique users in 4 weeks, Sony 21,000+ voice calls in 2 months, Lion Parcel 85% automation rate, AirAsia employee experience transformation
Enterprise Scale: Customers include Sony, Domino's, Hyundai, Volkswagen, Ferrellgas across 85+ countries with billion+ conversation processing
Customer support automation: AI assistants handling common queries, reducing support ticket volume, providing 24/7 instant responses with source citations
Internal knowledge management: Employee self-service for HR policies, technical documentation, onboarding materials, company procedures across 1,400+ file formats
Sales enablement: Product information chatbots, lead qualification, customer education with white-labeled widgets on websites and apps
Documentation assistance: Technical docs, help centers, FAQs with automatic website crawling and sitemap indexing
Educational platforms: Course materials, research assistance, student support with multimedia content (YouTube transcriptions, podcasts)
Healthcare information: Patient education, medical knowledge bases (SOC 2 Type II compliant for sensitive data)
E-commerce: Product recommendations, order assistance, customer inquiries with API integration to 5,000+ apps via Zapier
SaaS onboarding: User guides, feature explanations, troubleshooting with multi-agent support for different teams
Security & Compliance
SOC 2 Type II certified: Achieved October 2025 through A-LIGN audit covering Security, Availability, and Confidentiality trust criteria - demonstrates enterprise-grade security controls
GDPR Compliant: May 2018 certification with designated Data Protection Officer and full subject rights support (access, rectification, erasure, portability, restriction)
AWS infrastructure: All customer data resides on AWS in EEA member countries for European data sovereignty and GDPR compliance
Encryption standards: TLS 1.2+ with 256-bit SSL for data in transit, AES-256 for data at rest, irreversible password hashing (no plaintext storage)
Two-factor authentication: TOTP-based 2FA available on all plans for account security hardening
Role-based access control: Admin, Moderator, and Agent roles with configurable permissions on Growth+ plans; agent groups for departmental routing
SSO: Single sign-on available on Enterprise plans for centralized identity management and authentication
30-day audit logs: Available on Business plan for compliance tracking, security monitoring, and incident investigation
AI data privacy: Lyro conversations NOT used for training public AI models - Anthropic's Claude processes in-session only without persistent data storage or model training
LIMITATION: NO HIPAA certification: SOC 2 Type II + GDPR only - Tidio indicates working toward healthcare compliance but no timeline or BAA availability
LIMITATION: Limited compliance scope: No ISO 27001, PCI DSS Level 1, or FedRAMP certifications limiting adoption in regulated industries beyond basic GDPR
SOC 2 Type II: Independently audited security controls and compliance certification with annual penetration testing validation
ISO Certifications: ISO 27001 (Information Security Management), ISO 27018 (Cloud Privacy Controls), ISO 27701 (Privacy Information Management)
HIPAA Compliant: Healthcare industry ready for protected health information (PHI) handling with Business Associate Agreement support
GDPR Compliant: European data protection and privacy rights with regional data centers in EU for data residency requirements
PCI DSS Certified: Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Level 1 compliance for financial transaction security
FedRAMP Authorized: Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program certification for US government cloud deployments
Encryption Standards: AES-256 encryption at rest, TLS 1.3 for data in transit exceeding industry baseline requirements
Regional Data Centers: 6 global regions (US, EU, Singapore, India, Indonesia, UAE) with customer-selected data residency for compliance and latency optimization
Enterprise Identity Management: SSO/SAML integration with Google, Microsoft, Azure AD, LDAP for unified access control
RBAC Controls: Six permission levels for granular team access control with IP whitelisting for network-level security
Audit Logs: 15-day API activity retention for compliance reporting and security monitoring
On-Premise Options: Private cloud and complete on-premise deployment available for air-gapped environments and complete data sovereignty
AI Training Privacy: Models trained on anonymized customer interactions with PII masking at data layer before processing
Growth: $59-$349/month - 250-2,000 billable conversations, Lyro separate addon, advanced analytics, Shopify actions, 10 operators, agent groups
Plus: $749/month - Custom billable (2,000+ conversations), up to 5,000 Lyro conversations, API access, webhooks, white-labeling, Customer Success Manager, 10 operators
Premium: $2,999+/month - Unlimited billable conversations, up to 10,000 Lyro conversations, 50% resolution guarantee, SLAs, unlimited operators, dedicated support
Lyro AI pricing: Approximately $0.50 per conversation (1 conversation = 1 customer interaction with AI reply, auto-closes after 15 minutes inactivity) - separate addon on Growth tier
10-operator cap NOTE: All self-serve plans (Free through Plus) limited to 10 operators - unlimited seats require Premium tier ($2,999+/month) blocking team scalability
API access locked: OpenAPI REST endpoints and Webhooks require Plus plan minimum ($749/month) - unavailable on Free/Starter/Growth tiers limiting integration options
White-labeling cost: $20/month addon on Growth tier OR included with Plus ($749+/month) - not available on Free/Starter plans
Annual savings: Approximately 20% discount when paying annually vs monthly billing across all tiers
Cost scaling concern: Per-conversation model at $0.50/Lyro chat escalates costs significantly at high volume vs unlimited usage in RAG platforms - $500/month for 1,000 AI conversations
Basic Plan (AWS Marketplace): ~$10,000/year minimum for single use case implementation with limited channel access
Standard Plan: ~$25,000/year for up to 4 use cases with expanded capabilities and additional channels
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing requiring sales engagement - unlimited bots, channels, integrations with dedicated support and SLA guarantees
Implementation Timeline: Typically 4 months from contract to full deployment with professional services included (G2 user data)
Additional Costs: Voice AI features and advanced generative AI capabilities incur separate charges beyond base platform subscription
Sales-Led Process: All paid plans beyond free tier require sales contact - no self-service purchasing or transparent public pricing
Payment Terms: Annual contracts standard for commercial plans with monthly billing unavailable for most tiers
Entry Barrier: $10K minimum annual spend creates significant barrier for small businesses, startups, and individual developers
On-Premise Pricing: Custom enterprise pricing for private cloud and on-premise deployments with additional implementation costs
Regional Variations: Pricing may vary by selected data center region and compliance requirements
Scale Justification: 16 billion+ conversations annually and enterprise customer base (Sony, Domino's, Hyundai) validates high-end positioning
Standard Plan: $99/month or $89/month annual - 10 custom chatbots, 5,000 items per chatbot, 60 million words per bot, basic helpdesk support, standard security
View Pricing
Premium Plan: $499/month or $449/month annual - 100 custom chatbots, 20,000 items per chatbot, 300 million words per bot, advanced support, enhanced security, additional customization
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing - Comprehensive AI solutions, highest security and compliance, dedicated account managers, custom SSO, token authentication, priority support with faster SLAs
Enterprise Solutions
7-Day Free Trial: Full access to Standard features without charges - available to all users
Annual billing discount: Save 10% by paying upfront annually ($89/mo Standard, $449/mo Premium)
Flat monthly rates: No per-query charges, no hidden costs for API access or white-labeling (included in all plans)
Managed infrastructure: Auto-scaling cloud infrastructure included - no additional hosting or scaling fees
Support & Documentation
Live chat support: Available on all plans with tier-based response times (24/7 on Plus/Premium vs business hours on lower tiers)
Email support: All plans with priority levels based on subscription tier - fastest response on Premium
Customer Success Manager: Dedicated CSM on Plus ($749/month) for onboarding guidance, optimization strategy, and ongoing consultation
SLA guarantees: Premium tier ($2,999+/month) with 50% resolution guarantee and uptime commitments for mission-critical deployments
Knowledge base: Self-service articles and video tutorials for common setup scenarios, troubleshooting guides, and feature configuration
User satisfaction: 4.7/5 G2 rating (1,600+ reviews) with support quality consistently praised; 68% five-star ratings demonstrate high satisfaction
LIMITATION: NO public community forums: No user community, Slack workspace, or Discord server for peer support and knowledge sharing among users
LIMITATION: NO phone support: No phone support available on any tier (chat and email only) limiting support options for urgent issues
Developer support gap: Tidio explicitly states 'cannot provide direct assistance with API implementations' - technical support severely limited for custom integrations requiring code
Multi-Channel Support: Email, live chat, phone support with tier-based response time guarantees
Enterprise Support: Dedicated customer success managers, priority support queues, SLA guarantees with 1-hour response times on critical issues
Professional Services: Implementation services included in enterprise packages with typical 4-month deployment timeline and project management
Documentation Portal: Available at docs.yellow.ai with API references, integration guides, mobile SDK documentation with code examples
Mobile SDK Resources: Comprehensive Android, iOS, React Native, Flutter, Cordova documentation with complete code examples, Postman collections, demo applications
Training & Onboarding: Included in enterprise packages with dedicated training resources and guided implementation support
Community Forums: Available for peer support, knowledge sharing, and best practices discussion among Yellow.ai users
Gartner Recognition: Magic Quadrant 'Challenger' status (2023/2025) provides third-party analyst validation and market positioning
Customer Base: Enterprise brands including Sony, Domino's, Hyundai, Volkswagen, Ferrellgas deployed across 85+ countries
G2 Feedback: 4.4/5 overall (106 reviews) with 9.3/10 customization, 9.2/10 proactive engagement - mixed post-onboarding support quality noted
Documentation Gaps: Web SDK documentation criticized as "hit and miss" by reviewers - mobile SDKs better documented than web integration
Learning Curve: Steep complexity curve noted by users - G2 reviewer: "Setup felt akin to solving a Rubik's cube blindfolded"
Developer Resources: Strong mobile SDK documentation, weak Python SDK (doesn't exist), limited API cookbook/advanced tutorial content
Documentation hub: Rich docs, tutorials, cookbooks, FAQs, API references for rapid onboarding
Developer Docs
Email and in-app support: Quick support via email and in-app chat for all users
Premium support: Premium and Enterprise plans include dedicated account managers and faster SLAs
Code samples: Cookbooks, step-by-step guides, and examples for every skill level
API Documentation
Active community: User community plus 5,000+ app integrations through Zapier ecosystem
Regular updates: Platform stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements automatically
Limitations & Considerations
NOT a RAG platform: Customer service automation platform, NOT RAG-as-a-Service - lacks vector databases, embedding controls, configurable retrieval pipelines (rated 2/10 as RAG alternative)
Limited knowledge sources: Restricted to URLs, PDFs, CSVs with 10,000 Q&A entry limit vs unlimited documents and 1,400+ formats in RAG platforms
No programmatic knowledge API: Cannot upload documents, manage Q&A pairs, or configure knowledge base via API - all knowledge management requires UI interaction
No Lyro AI querying API: Cannot trigger AI responses or access retrieval endpoints programmatically - API limited to chat operations (contacts, tickets, conversations)
Fixed Claude 3 model: NO model selection, routing, or BYOLLM capabilities - eliminates LLM flexibility entirely (rated 3/10 for model flexibility)
Analytics depth limitations: Users report analytics "helpful but not as detailed as enterprise tools" with limited funnel and flow-level analytics vs specialized platforms
No AI performance metrics: No retrieval accuracy dashboards, semantic search performance tracking, hallucination rate monitoring, or confidence scoring visibility
Per-conversation pricing scaling: $0.50/Lyro chat costs escalate quickly at high volumes (1,000 AI conversations = $500/month) vs unlimited usage competitors
10-operator cap constraint: Self-serve plans limited to 10 operators until Premium tier ($2,999+/month) restricting team scalability for growing businesses
No native Slack/Teams integration: Only Zapier notifications available - no bidirectional chat or native bot deployment in workplace messaging platforms
Knowledge Base accuracy concerns: Opaque Q&A extraction methodology without retrieval parameter controls or hybrid search capabilities limiting accuracy vs specialized RAG platforms
NOT a RAG-as-a-Service Platform: Full-stack enterprise conversational AI with embedded RAG - cannot use Yellow.ai purely as knowledge/RAG backend for custom applications
No API-First Development: Cannot programmatically create bots/agents, upload documents, manage knowledge bases, or directly query RAG endpoints - platform-centric architecture
Missing Developer Tools: No Python SDK (major gap for backend developers), no npm package for web SDK (script tag injection only), no OpenAPI specification published
Knowledge Ingestion Gaps: No Google Drive, Dropbox, Notion integration support - significant gap vs competitors like CustomGPT and YourGPT
YouTube & Audio Limitations: No YouTube transcript ingestion, no native audio/video file processing support
High Entry Barrier: $10K-$25K annual minimum with 4-month implementation timeline vs competitors offering $19-99/month self-service tiers
Use Case Mismatch: Excellent for enterprises needing omnichannel CX automation; poor fit for developers seeking programmable RAG APIs or simple chatbot embedding
Vendor Lock-In Risk: Proprietary platform with limited portability - difficult to migrate conversation flows, knowledge bases, and integrations to alternative solutions
Managed service approach: Less control over underlying RAG pipeline configuration compared to build-your-own solutions like LangChain
Vendor lock-in: Proprietary platform - migration to alternative RAG solutions requires rebuilding knowledge bases
Model selection: Limited to OpenAI (GPT-5.1 and 4 series) and Anthropic (Claude, opus and sonnet 4.5) - no support for other LLM providers (Cohere, AI21, open-source models)
Pricing at scale: Flat-rate pricing may become expensive for very high-volume use cases (millions of queries/month) compared to pay-per-use models
Customization limits: While highly configurable, some advanced RAG techniques (custom reranking, hybrid search strategies) may not be exposed
Language support: Supports 90+ languages but performance may vary for less common languages or specialized domains
Real-time data: Knowledge bases require re-indexing for updates - not ideal for real-time data requirements (stock prices, live inventory)
Enterprise features: Some advanced features (custom SSO, token authentication) only available on Enterprise plan with custom pricing
Customization & Flexibility
N/A
Knowledge Updates: Manual via UI only - no API for programmatic document upload or management
After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both Tidio and Yellow.ai are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.
When to Choose Tidio
You value exceptional ease of use: 4.7/5 g2 rating with 253 'ease of use' and 161 'easy setup' mentions
Claude 3-powered Lyro AI achieving 79-87% success rates with customer case studies reporting 89-90% automation
300,000+ businesses served including Pizza Hut, Decathlon, Casio demonstrating SMB/e-commerce market fit
Best For: Exceptional ease of use: 4.7/5 G2 rating with 253 'Ease of Use' and 161 'Easy Setup' mentions
When to Choose Yellow.ai
You value genuinely comprehensive 35+ channel coverage: whatsapp bsp, messenger, instagram, telegram, slack, teams, voice, sms
Switching between Tidio and Yellow.ai requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.
Pricing Comparison Summary
Tidio starts at $29/month, while Yellow.ai begins at custom pricing. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.
Our Recommendation Process
Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality
For most organizations, the decision between Tidio and Yellow.ai comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.
📚 Next Steps
Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.
• Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
• Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
• Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
• Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements
Last updated: December 11, 2025 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.
The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.
DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.
People Also Compare
Explore more AI tool comparisons to find the perfect solution for your needs
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...