What are the main differences between Azumo and SimplyRetrieve?

Azumo excels in Highly skilled nearshore developers in same timezone and Extensive AI/ML expertise since 2016, scoring 92/100 in user ratings with 91% accuracy. SimplyRetrieve leads in Completely free and open source and Strong privacy focus - fully localized with 82/100 overall rating and 86% accuracy. Key technical difference: Azumo focuses on Custom AI/ML development while SimplyRetrieve emphasizes Retrieval-Centric Generation (RCG). Pricing differs by $100000/month.

Which is better for enterprises: Azumo or SimplyRetrieve?

Azumo offers SOC 2 compliance for enterprise security. HIPAA compliance is available in SimplyRetrieve. For scalability, Azumo supports on-premise deployment for maximum control. Azumo leads with 92/100 enterprise readiness score (91/100 enterprise features).

How much does Azumo cost vs SimplyRetrieve?

Azumo starts at $100000/custom (enterprise model), while SimplyRetrieve begins at contact sales/forever (open-source model). SimplyRetrieve provides a free tier. This represents a significant price difference of $100000/month. See our detailed pricing breakdown for complete tier comparisons.

Can I migrate from SimplyRetrieve to Azumo?

Migration from SimplyRetrieve to Azumo typically requires manual data transfer since API access may be limited. Azumo offers good documentation for the migration process. Estimated migration time: 1-2 days for cloud setup. Contact Azumo support for migration assistance and best practices.

What integrations do Azumo and SimplyRetrieve support?

Azumo integrates with OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud (12 integrations total). SimplyRetrieve supports Hugging Face models, Gradio, PyTorch, FAISS, Various open-source LLMs (6 integrations available). SimplyRetrieve offers API capabilities. Azumo offers 100% more integrations, with webhook support for real-time data sync.

What are the main differences between Azumo and SimplyRetrieve?

Azumo offers strong capabilities, scoring 0/100 in user ratings. SimplyRetrieve provides unique strengths with 0/100 overall rating. Key technical difference: Azumo focuses on advanced features while SimplyRetrieve emphasizes specialized capabilities.

Which is better for enterprises: Azumo or SimplyRetrieve?

Both platforms provide enterprise-grade security. HIPAA compliance varies - contact vendors for details. For scalability, both offer cloud-based deployment options. SimplyRetrieve leads with strong/100 enterprise readiness score.

How much does Azumo cost vs SimplyRetrieve?

Azumo starts at custom pricing/month (subscription model), while SimplyRetrieve begins at contact sales/month (subscription model). Both require paid plans. Pricing is relatively comparable. See our detailed pricing breakdown for complete tier comparisons.

Can I migrate from Azumo to SimplyRetrieve?

Migration from Azumo to SimplyRetrieve typically requires manual data transfer since API access may be limited. SimplyRetrieve offers standard documentation for the migration process. Estimated migration time: 1-2 days for cloud setup. Contact SimplyRetrieve support for migration assistance and best practices.

What integrations do Azumo and SimplyRetrieve support?

Azumo integrates with (multiple platforms). SimplyRetrieve supports (various tools). API availability varies by plan. Integration coverage is comparable.

Azumo vs SimplyRetrieve

Make an informed decision with our comprehensive comparison. Discover which RAG solution perfectly fits your needs.

More about SimplyRetrieve More about Azumo Get Started Today

Priyansh KhodiyarDevRel at CustomGPT.ai

Fact checked and reviewed by Bill Cava

Published: 01.04.2025Updated: 25.04.2025

In this comprehensive guide, we compare Azumo and SimplyRetrieve across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.

Overview

When choosing between Azumo and SimplyRetrieve, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.

Quick Decision Guide

Choose Azumo if: you value highly skilled nearshore developers in same timezone
Choose SimplyRetrieve if: you value completely free and open source

About Azumo

Azumo is top-rated nearshore ai development services for custom solutions. Azumo is a leading nearshore software development company specializing in custom AI and machine learning solutions, offering dedicated teams and enterprise-grade development services for businesses looking to build intelligent applications. Founded in 2016, headquartered in San Francisco, CA, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.

Overall Rating

92/100

Starting Price

$100000/mo

About SimplyRetrieve

SimplyRetrieve is lightweight retrieval-centric generative ai platform. SimplyRetrieve is an open-source tool providing a fully localized, lightweight, and user-friendly GUI and API platform for Retrieval-Centric Generation (RCG). It emphasizes privacy and can run on a single GPU while maintaining clear separation between LLM context interpretation and knowledge memorization. Founded in 2019, headquartered in Tokyo, Japan, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.

Overall Rating

82/100

Starting Price

Custom

Key Differences at a Glance

In terms of user ratings, Azumo in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, SimplyRetrieve offers more competitive entry pricing. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: AI Development versus RAG Platform. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.

⚠️ What This Comparison Covers

We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.

Detailed Feature Comparison

Azumo	SimplyRetrieve	CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
Custom ETL Pipelines – Pulls from proprietary systems, SharePoint, wikis, cloud storage into single index Unstructured + Structured – PDFs, HTML, multimedia, databases, spreadsheets unified knowledge base Learn more Vector Databases – Pinecone, Weaviate integration for domain-specific data indexing and retrieval	File-Based Workflow – Drop PDFs, DOCX, PPTX, HTML into folder and embed via script GUI Knowledge Editor – Add documents on-the-fly through basic interface Manual Processing – ⚠️ No web crawler or automatic refresh capabilities Local Storage – ✅ All data stays on your machine for air-gapped deployments	1,400+ file formats – PDF, DOCX, Excel, PowerPoint, Markdown, HTML + auto-extraction from ZIP/RAR/7Z archives Website crawling – Sitemap indexing with configurable depth for help docs, FAQs, and public content Multimedia transcription – AI Vision, OCR, YouTube/Vimeo/podcast speech-to-text built-in Cloud integrations – Google Drive, SharePoint, OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion with auto-sync Knowledge platforms – Zendesk, Freshdesk, HubSpot, Confluence, Shopify connectors Massive scale – 60M words (Standard) / 300M words (Premium) per bot with no performance degradation
Integrations & Channels
Bespoke Connectors – Custom integrations for CRM, ERP, internal intranets, legacy systems Multi-Channel Deployment – Web, mobile, Slack, Microsoft Teams via custom interfaces Integration services	Local Gradio GUI – Python scripts for queries with no pre-built channels No Native Integrations – ⚠️ No Slack, Teams, or website widgets out-of-box Custom Wrappers Required – Build your own connectors to forward messages	Website embedding – Lightweight JS widget or iframe with customizable positioning CMS plugins – WordPress, WIX, Webflow, Framer, SquareSpace native support 5,000+ app ecosystem – Zapier connects CRMs, marketing, e-commerce tools MCP Server – Integrate with Claude Desktop, Cursor, ChatGPT, Windsurf OpenAI SDK compatible – Drop-in replacement for OpenAI API endpoints LiveChat + Slack – Native chat widgets with human handoff capabilities
Core Chatbot Features
RAG Agents – Context-rich answers via advanced relevancy search and prompt engineering Multi-Turn Conversations – Context retention with source attribution for trust See approach Multi-Agent Systems – Complex agent orchestration and multi-step reasoning for business workflows	Open-Source RAG Bot – Runs on local LLMs with streaming responses Single-Turn Q&A – ⚠️ Limited multi-turn conversation and long-term memory Retrieval Tuning Module – Transparency layer showing answer construction process Basic Interactions – No lead capture or human handoff features	✅ #1 accuracy – Median 5/5 in independent benchmarks, 10% lower hallucination than OpenAI ✅ Source citations – Every response includes clickable links to original documents ✅ 93% resolution rate – Handles queries autonomously, reducing human workload ✅ 92 languages – Native multilingual support without per-language config ✅ Lead capture – Built-in email collection, custom forms, real-time notifications ✅ Human handoff – Escalation with full conversation context preserved
Customization & Branding
✅ Unlimited Customization – Persona, tone, fully branded UI through bespoke development Brand Voice Matching – Voice, greetings, fonts, colors, layouts tailored collaboratively Learn more	Plain Gradio Interface – Minimal theming with developer-focused design Source Code Customization – Tweak code or build custom front-end for branding	Full white-labeling included – Colors, logos, CSS, custom domains at no extra cost 2-minute setup – No-code wizard with drag-and-drop interface Persona customization – Control AI personality, tone, response style via pre-prompts Visual theme editor – Real-time preview of branding changes Domain allowlisting – Restrict embedding to approved sites only
L L M Model Options
✅ Model-Agnostic – GPT-4, Claude, LLaMA, Gemini, Cohere, open-source alternatives supported Domain Fine-Tuning – Custom model tuning on business data for performance boost Learn more	WizardVicuna-13B Default – Instruction-tuned open-source model included Hugging Face Compatible – Swap any model with sufficient GPU resources Full Local Control – ✅ No external APIs or cloud dependencies Model Limitations – ⚠️ Smaller models won't match GPT-4 depth	GPT-5.1 models – Latest thinking models (Optimal & Smart variants) GPT-4 series – GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-4o available Claude 4.5 – Anthropic's Opus available for Enterprise Auto model routing – Balances cost/performance automatically Zero API key management – All models managed behind the scenes
Developer Experience ( A P I & S D Ks)
⚠️ Custom APIs Only – Tailor-made microservices, no off-the-shelf SDKs or self-service LangChain/Haystack – Internal frameworks with docs and code reviews on delivery See process	Python Script Interface – No formal REST API or SDK Subprocess Integration – Call scripts directly or build custom wrapper Open Source Access – ✅ Full code access for modification	REST API – Full-featured for agents, projects, data ingestion, chat queries Python SDK – Open-source `customgpt-client` with full API coverage Postman collections – Pre-built requests for rapid prototyping Webhooks – Real-time event notifications for conversations and leads OpenAI compatible – Use existing OpenAI SDK code with minimal changes
Performance & Accuracy
✅ High Accuracy – Fine-tuned retrieval, advanced reranking for relevant context only Scalable Infrastructure – Efficient vector search, low latency on complex queries Benchmarks	Slower Inference – ⚠️ 3-10+ seconds per reply on single GPU Decent Accuracy – Good when relevant docs found, struggles with complexity FAISS Vector Search – Fast retrieval using Facebook's library	Sub-second responses – Optimized RAG with vector search and multi-layer caching Benchmark-proven – 13% higher accuracy, 34% faster than OpenAI Assistants API Anti-hallucination tech – Responses grounded only in your provided content OpenGraph citations – Rich visual cards with titles, descriptions, images 99.9% uptime – Auto-scaling infrastructure handles traffic spikes
Customization & Flexibility ( Behavior & Knowledge)
✅ Complete Control – Multiple datastores, role-based access, custom system prompt tuning Continuous Refinement – Add training data, tune prompts, custom logic integration Learn more	Deep Parameter Control – Tweak retrieval params, system prompts, knowledge weighting Embedding Model Swap – Replace multilingual-e5-base with alternatives Pipeline Modification – ✅ Full source access for custom logic	Live content updates – Add/remove content with automatic re-indexing System prompts – Shape agent behavior and voice through instructions Multi-agent support – Different bots for different teams Smart defaults – No ML expertise required for custom behavior
Pricing & Scalability
⚠️ Project-Based Pricing – $10K+ minimum, higher upfront than SaaS subscriptions Pricing ✅ Enterprise Scale – Infrastructure scales with query volume and data growth automatically	MIT Licensed – ✅ Completely free with no subscription fees Infrastructure Costs – Pay only for GPU hardware or cloud servers Manual Scaling – ⚠️ Spin up and manage your own hardware	Standard: $99/mo – 60M words, 10 bots Premium: $449/mo – 300M words, 100 bots Auto-scaling – Managed cloud scales with demand Flat rates – No per-query charges
Security & Privacy
✅ Data Sovereignty – On-prem or VPC deployments for complete data control Enterprise Compliance – HIPAA, FINRA, GDPR with encryption and granular access Security	100% Local Execution – ✅ Perfect for sensitive data and air-gapped environments No External Transmission – All processing stays on-premises DIY Security – ⚠️ No built-in auth, you implement access controls	SOC 2 Type II + GDPR – Third-party audited compliance Encryption – 256-bit AES at rest, SSL/TLS in transit Access controls – RBAC, 2FA, SSO, domain allowlisting Data isolation – Never trains on your data
Observability & Monitoring
Comprehensive Logging – Query performance, retrieval success, response times tracked out-of-box Stack Integration – Splunk, CloudWatch integration for real-time alerts and analytics Learn more	Analysis Tab – Shows retrieved docs and query construction process Console Logging – Basic logs printed to terminal No Dashboard – ⚠️ Add your own monitoring for stats	Real-time dashboard – Query volumes, token usage, response times Customer Intelligence – User behavior patterns, popular queries, knowledge gaps Conversation analytics – Full transcripts, resolution rates, common questions Export capabilities – API export to BI tools and data warehouses
Support & Ecosystem
✅ White-Glove Support – Dedicated manager, direct dev team access during and post-deployment Details Technology Partnerships – Snowflake partnership, deep expertise across multiple AI platforms	Community-Driven – GitHub issues and lightweight documentation Research Foundation – Academic paper (arXiv 2308.03983) on RCG approach No Paid Support – ⚠️ No SLA or enterprise help desk	Comprehensive docs – Tutorials, cookbooks, API references Email + in-app support – Under 24hr response time Premium support – Dedicated account managers for Premium/Enterprise Open-source SDK – Python SDK, Postman, GitHub examples 5,000+ Zapier apps – CRMs, e-commerce, marketing integrations
Core Agent Features
Custom RAG – Context-rich answers via relevancy search and prompt engineering Approach Multi-Agent Systems – Orchestration and multi-step reasoning for complex workflows Voice & Text – Voice agents, text chatbots, hybrid solutions per channel CRM Integration – Salesforce, HubSpot, Dynamics integration for lead capture and management Human Handoff – Context transfer when AI confidence drops or queries complex ✅ Bespoke Development – No off-the-shelf limits on functionality or integration capabilities	Retrieval-Centric Generation – Research approach separating reasoning from knowledge Retrieval Tuning Module – ✅ Developer transparency showing document selection Knowledge Base Mixing – Route queries across multiple sources Single-Turn Focus – ⚠️ Limited multi-turn conversation memory No Chatbot UI – ⚠️ Gradio for developers only No Production Features – ⚠️ No lead capture, handoff, or multi-channel support	Custom AI Agents – Autonomous GPT-4/Claude agents for business tasks Multi-Agent Systems – Specialized agents for support, sales, knowledge Memory & Context – Persistent conversation history across sessions Tool Integration – Webhooks + 5,000 Zapier apps for automation Continuous Learning – Auto re-indexing without manual retraining
R A G-as-a- Service Assessment
⚠️ Custom Agency NOT SaaS – Bespoke RAG solutions, not self-service platform Target Audience – Enterprises with $10K+ budgets, complex needs, not rapid prototyping ✅ Complete Pipeline – Chunking, embeddings, vector DBs, retrieval, reranking customized Agentic RAG – Multi-agent reasoning, self-validation, real-time orchestration Approach ✅ Code Ownership – Clients own code and infrastructure for complete control ⚠️ Timeline – Weeks to months delivery, not instant API access	NOT RAG-AS-A-SERVICE – Open-source research project for local experimentation Academic Foundation – Published research tool from RCGAI (arXiv 2308.03983) Self-Hosted Only – ⚠️ No managed infrastructure, APIs, or SLAs Developer-First Design – Python with GPU infrastructure requirements 100% Local Execution – ✅ Perfect for air-gapped and classified environments No Service Features – ⚠️ No auth, multi-tenancy, analytics, or SaaS conveniences	Platform type – TRUE RAG-AS-A-SERVICE with managed infrastructure API-first – REST API, Python SDK, OpenAI compatibility, MCP Server No-code option – 2-minute wizard deployment for non-developers Hybrid positioning – Serves both dev teams (APIs) and business users (no-code) Enterprise ready – SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, WCAG 2.0, flat-rate pricing
Additional Considerations
✅ Best For – Mission-critical AI, legacy system integration, complex multi-step workflows ✅ Code Ownership – Ultimate flexibility to maintain or extend post-delivery Approach ⚠️ Investment – Higher upfront cost, longer rollout than SaaS tools	N/A	Time-to-value – 2-minute deployment vs weeks with DIY Always current – Auto-updates to latest GPT models Proven scale – 6,000+ organizations, millions of queries Multi-LLM – OpenAI + Claude reduces vendor lock-in
No- Code Interface & Usability
⚠️ No Pre-Built UI – Admin/user interfaces built as part of custom solution Developer Required – Non-developers need developer help for changes despite polished UI	N/A	2-minute deployment – Fastest time-to-value in the industry Wizard interface – Step-by-step with visual previews Drag-and-drop – Upload files, paste URLs, connect cloud storage In-browser testing – Test before deploying to production Zero learning curve – Productive on day one
Competitive Positioning
Market Position – Premium custom AI agency for mission-critical enterprise RAG solutions Target Customers – Large enterprises, regulated industries (HIPAA, FINRA) with legacy integration needs Key Competitors – Deviniti, Contextual.ai, Azure AI, OpenAI enterprise, internal dev teams ✅ Advantages – Model-agnostic, white-glove support, code ownership, on-prem/VPC deployment, Snowflake partnerships Pricing Value – Higher upfront, no recurring costs; best for complex unique requirements Ideal Use Cases – Legacy integration, specialized workflows, fine-tuning, compliance needing on-prem control	Market Position – MIT open-source local RAG for on-premises deployment Target Customers – Developers experimenting locally, strict data isolation orgs Key Competitors – LangChain, LlamaIndex, PrivateGPT, LocalGPT Advantages – ✅ Free MIT license, 100% local, full model control Best For – Offline environments, GPU infrastructure teams, zero cloud costs	Market position – Leading RAG platform balancing enterprise accuracy with no-code usability. Trusted by 6,000+ orgs including Adobe, MIT, Dropbox. Key differentiators – #1 benchmarked accuracy • 1,400+ formats • Full white-labeling included • Flat-rate pricing vs OpenAI – 10% lower hallucination, 13% higher accuracy, 34% faster vs Botsonic/Chatbase – More file formats, source citations, no hidden costs vs LangChain – Production-ready in 2 min vs weeks of development
A I Models
✅ Model-Agnostic – GPT-4, Claude 3.5, Gemini, LLaMA 3.3, Qwen, Cohere, open-source ⚠️ Selection Process – Azumo team determines during discovery, not self-service configuration Fine-Tuning – Domain-specific tuning on curated datasets reflecting real business environments Provider Relationships – OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, DeepSeek, xAI, Mistral partnerships	WizardVicuna-13B – Default uncensored instruction-tuned model Any Hugging Face Model – Llama 2, Falcon, Mistral with GPU capacity No Vendor Lock-In – ✅ Complete flexibility without API limits Performance Trade-Off – ⚠️ Open models slower than managed cloud APIs	OpenAI – GPT-5.1 (Optimal/Smart), GPT-4 series Anthropic – Claude 4.5 Opus/Sonnet (Enterprise) Auto-routing – Intelligent model selection for cost/performance Managed – No API keys or fine-tuning required
R A G Capabilities
Vector Databases – Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant integration for domain-specific data handling Semantic Chunking – Breaks docs by topic/intent, sizes vary by content type Advanced Retrieval – Relevancy search with reranking for high accuracy context 128K Context Window – Large document processing and complex queries supported ✅ Complete Pipeline – Chunking, embedding, vector search, reranking, answer generation with citations	Retrieval-Centric Generation – Research-backed approach separating LLM from knowledge memorization Mixtures-of-Knowledge-Bases – Multiple knowledge bases with intelligent routing Explicit Prompt-Weighting – Control retrieved content influence on answers Retrieval Transparency – ✅ Visual debugging showing document selection FAISS Search – Fast approximate nearest neighbor retrieval	GPT-4 + RAG – Outperforms OpenAI in independent benchmarks Anti-hallucination – Responses grounded in your content only Automatic citations – Clickable source links in every response Sub-second latency – Optimized vector search and caching Scale to 300M words – No performance degradation at scale
Use Cases
Primary Industries – E-commerce, healthcare, finance, manufacturing/logistics with complex AI needs Enterprise Apps – Custom ETL, wiki integration, SharePoint connectors, multi-agent systems Team Sizes – Large enterprises, 1-15 Azumo members working alongside client teams Common Projects – Legacy modernization, Azure migrations, health screening, CRM integration with AI ⚠️ Timeline – 12-18 month pilots typical before company-wide rollout, slower than SaaS	Air-Gapped Environments – ✅ Defense, classified research requiring offline operation Healthcare PHI Compliance – HIPAA organizations needing 100% data isolation RAG Research – Developers learning internals with full transparency Zero-Cost RAG – Teams with GPU infrastructure avoiding subscriptions Data Sovereignty – Strict data residency preventing cloud processing	Customer support – 24/7 AI handling common queries with citations Internal knowledge – HR policies, onboarding, technical docs Sales enablement – Product info, lead qualification, education Documentation – Help centers, FAQs with auto-crawling E-commerce – Product recommendations, order assistance
Security & Compliance
✅ Certifications – HIPAA with BAA, FINRA, GDPR compliance for regulated industries ✅ Deployment Options – On-premise or VPC for data sovereignty, cloud-agnostic architecture Encryption – Enterprise-grade at rest/transit, granular access controls, role-based permissions Custom Retention – Data retention policies tailored to industry compliance mandates Monitoring – Logging tied to Splunk, CloudWatch for real-time alerts and analytics Vulnerability Management – Continuous security scanning and threat detection for production systems	Complete Data Isolation – ✅ Ideal for classified, PHI, PII data No Third-Party APIs – Zero external calls to cloud providers Open-Source Auditing – Full code transparency for security reviews Self-Managed Security – ⚠️ You control all security layers	SOC 2 Type II + GDPR – Regular third-party audits, full EU compliance 256-bit AES encryption – Data at rest; SSL/TLS in transit SSO + 2FA + RBAC – Enterprise access controls with role-based permissions Data isolation – Never trains on customer data Domain allowlisting – Restrict chatbot to approved domains
Pricing & Plans
⚠️ Project-Based – $10K+ minimum, $4,200-$70K+ range, higher upfront than SaaS Hourly Rate – Average $25-49/hour, costs scale by scope and complexity Billing Flexibility – Week-by-week exploratory pricing, custom enterprise agreements (average 3.2+ years) Team Size – 1-15 members ensuring quality service and timely delivery ✅ Value – Full code ownership, no recurring costs, long-term investment payoff	MIT License – ✅ Free with no subscription or API charges GPU Costs Only – Hardware or cloud compute are sole expenses Unlimited Queries – No per-request pricing or rate limits	Standard: $99/mo – 10 chatbots, 60M words, 5K items/bot Premium: $449/mo – 100 chatbots, 300M words, 20K items/bot Enterprise: Custom – SSO, dedicated support, custom SLAs 7-day free trial – Full Standard access, no charges Flat-rate pricing – No per-query charges, no hidden costs
Support & Documentation
✅ White-Glove – Dedicated manager, direct dev team access during and post-deployment Project Management – Weekly meetings, backlog system, continuous engagement beyond original scope Custom Docs – Endpoint design, architecture diagrams, implementation guides delivered with code Training – In-person knowledge transfer sessions with client teams, clear docs ⚠️ No SLAs – Direct communication, high responsiveness reported but no formal SLAs ⚠️ No Community – Professional services model only, no public forums	GitHub Repository – Code, docs, and examples at RCGAI/SimplyRetrieve Academic Paper – arXiv 2308.03983 explaining RCG architecture Community Support – GitHub Issues for troubleshooting No Paid Support – ⚠️ Community-driven only, no SLAs	Documentation hub – Docs, tutorials, API references Support channels – Email, in-app chat, dedicated managers (Premium+) Open-source – Python SDK, Postman, GitHub examples Community – User community + 5,000 Zapier integrations
Limitations & Considerations
⚠️ High Initial Cost – $10K+ minimum, not suitable for small businesses ⚠️ Long Timeline – 12-18 month pilots, weeks to months vs. hours for SaaS ⚠️ Requires Dev Teams – Need internal developers to maintain and extend post-delivery ⚠️ Services-Driven – Azumo determines config, not self-service dashboard controls Learning Curve – Significant onboarding and training needed for client teams Not Ideal For – Simple use cases, rapid deployment needs, budget-constrained startups	Developer-Only Tool – ⚠️ Requires Python, GPU, and technical expertise GPU Infrastructure Required – ⚠️ Dedicated hardware or cloud GPU needed Basic UI – Gradio interface needs custom front-end for production Manual Scaling – ⚠️ No auto-scaling, you manage load balancing No Enterprise Features – Missing multi-tenancy, user management, analytics Slower Inference – ⚠️ 3-10+ seconds vs sub-second cloud APIs	Managed service – Less control over RAG pipeline vs build-your-own Model selection – OpenAI + Anthropic only; no Cohere, AI21, open-source Real-time data – Requires re-indexing; not ideal for live inventory/prices Enterprise features – Custom SSO only on Enterprise plan

Ready to experience the CustomGPT difference?

Start Free Trial →

Final Thoughts

Final Verdict: Azumo vs SimplyRetrieve

After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both Azumo and SimplyRetrieve are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.

When to Choose Azumo

You value highly skilled nearshore developers in same timezone
Extensive AI/ML expertise since 2016
Flexible engagement models (staff aug or project-based)

Best For: Highly skilled nearshore developers in same timezone

When to Choose SimplyRetrieve

You value completely free and open source
Strong privacy focus - fully localized
Lightweight - runs on single GPU

Best For: Completely free and open source

Migration & Switching Considerations

Switching between Azumo and SimplyRetrieve requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.

Pricing Comparison Summary

Azumo starts at $100000/month, while SimplyRetrieve begins at custom pricing. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.

Our Recommendation Process

Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality

For most organizations, the decision between Azumo and SimplyRetrieve comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.

📚 Next Steps

Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.

• Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
• Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
• Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
• Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements

Last updated: February 16, 2026 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.

Ready to Get Started with CustomGPT?

Join thousands of businesses that trust CustomGPT for their AI needs. Choose the path that works best for you.

Start Your Free Trial

Experience the full power of CustomGPT risk-free.

Get Started

RECOMMENDED

Request a Demo

See how CustomGPT can transform your business operations.

Get Started

Contact Sales

Get personalized guidance from our expert team.

Get Started

Why Choose CustomGPT?

97% Accuracy

Industry-leading benchmarks

5-Min Setup

Get started instantly

24/7 Support

Expert help when you need it

Enterprise Ready

Scale with confidence

Trusted by leading companies worldwide

CustomGPT

The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.

Get API Key Documentation Read our benchmarks

Get in touch
Contact Us

Join the Discussion

Loading comments...

Priyansh Khodiyar

DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.

Azumo vs SimplyRetrieve