In this comprehensive guide, we compare CODY AI and Tidio across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.
Overview
When choosing between CODY AI and Tidio, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose CODY AI if: you value true rag architecture with pinecone vector database and configurable retrieval parameters (relevance score, token distribution, focus mode)
Choose Tidio if: you value exceptional ease of use: 4.7/5 g2 rating with 253 'ease of use' and 161 'easy setup' mentions
About CODY AI
CODY AI is business-focused no-code rag platform with source attribution. Business-focused RAG-as-a-Service platform enabling no-code AI assistant creation trained on custom knowledge bases. Acquired by Just Build It (May 2024), claims 100,000+ businesses as customers. TRUE RAG platform with Pinecone vector database, multi-LLM support (GPT-4, Claude 3.5, Gemini 1.5, Llama 3.1 on Enterprise), and comprehensive REST API. Differentiators: source attribution with every response, Focus Mode (inject 1,000 docs into context), 15-minute bot deployment. Critical gaps: NO direct SOC 2 certification (infrastructure partners only), NO official SDKs, NO native cloud storage integrations. $0-$249/month credit-based pricing. Founded in 2022, headquartered in United States, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
85/100
Starting Price
$29/mo
About Tidio
Tidio is no-code customer service automation with claude 3-powered ai chatbots. Customer service automation platform with Claude 3-powered Lyro AI achieving 67-90% resolution rates. Founded 2013 by Tytus Gołąs (Poland), serves 300,000+ businesses including Pizza Hut, Decathlon, Casio. NOT a RAG-as-a-Service platform—optimized for SMB/e-commerce no-code chatbot building with exceptional ease of use (4.7/5 G2, 1,600+ reviews). SOC 2 Type II + GDPR certified. Critical gaps: NO programmatic knowledge API, NO LLM model selection (Claude-only), NO cloud storage integrations. $0-$2,999+/month with per-conversation billing ($0.50/Lyro chat). Founded in 2013, headquartered in San Francisco, CA (offices in Szczecin and Warsaw, Poland), the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
87/100
Starting Price
$29/mo
Key Differences at a Glance
In terms of user ratings, both platforms score similarly in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, pricing is comparable. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: AI Chatbot versus Customer Support. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.
⚠️ What This Comparison Covers
We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.
Detailed Feature Comparison
CODY AI
Tidio
CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
Supported formats: PDF, Word (.doc/.docx), PowerPoint (.ppt/.pptx), plain text files with 100MB maximum file size per document
Built-in text editor: Direct text input for creating knowledge base entries without file uploads
Website crawler (Premium/Advanced): Import up to 25,000 pages on Advanced tier with automatic recurring re-imports for up to 9 websites
Document capacity by tier: Free (100 documents), Basic (1,000), Premium (10,000), Advanced (25,000 documents + 25,000 crawled web pages)
Storage architecture: Amazon S3 with SSE-S3 encryption protocol for documents, Pinecone vector database (SOC 2 Type II certified) for embeddings
Dynamic chunking algorithm: Adjusts chunk size based on token distribution for optimal retrieval performance (specific parameters not publicly documented)
Manual retraining: Always available for immediate knowledge base updates across all plans
Automatic syncing: Limited to website sources only with recurring re-imports (not available for uploaded documents)
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO YouTube transcript support - cannot ingest video content from YouTube for training
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO native cloud integrations - Google Drive, Dropbox, Notion connections only via Zapier (adds friction vs direct OAuth)
LIMITATION: No NO audio file support (MP3, M4A), No NO video file support (MP4), No NO code file ingestion, No NO Excel/CSV direct import
Website URL crawling: Primary method scanning up to 500 URLs (expandable on Plus plans) with automatic Q&A pair extraction from web content
PDF uploads: Direct file upload support for PDF documents
CSV imports: Maximum 500 entries per file, 10,000 total Q&A limit across all sources
Manual Q&A creation: Admin panel configuration for custom question-answer pairs
Zendesk Help Center: Article import via API (closest to external knowledge integration available)
Automatic weekly re-sync: Website source updates available only on Plus/Premium plans
Continuous Q&A suggestions: System suggests new pairs from unanswered questions and historical conversations requiring manual review before activation
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO Word document (DOCX) support, No NO TXT files, No NO Excel files, No NO YouTube transcript processing, No NO audio/video file support, No NO code file ingestion
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO native cloud storage integrations - Google Drive, Dropbox, Notion connect via Zapier for workflows only (NOT as knowledge sources)
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO programmatic knowledge upload API - all data ingestion requires UI-based management, blocking automation workflows
Scaling constraint: 10,000 Q&A entry limit caps knowledge base size vs unlimited in RAG platforms
Per-conversation billing: Averaging $0.50 per AI conversation limits cost-effective scaling for high-volume use cases
Lets you ingest more than 1,400 file formats—PDF, DOCX, TXT, Markdown, HTML, and many more—via simple drag-and-drop or API.
Crawls entire sites through sitemaps and URLs, automatically indexing public help-desk articles, FAQs, and docs.
Turns multimedia into text on the fly: YouTube videos, podcasts, and other media are auto-transcribed with built-in OCR and speech-to-text.
View Transcription Guide
Connects to Google Drive, SharePoint, Notion, Confluence, HubSpot, and more through API connectors or Zapier.
See Zapier Connectors
Supports both manual uploads and auto-sync retraining, so your knowledge base always stays up to date.
Integrations & Channels
Native Slack integration: Free for all users with /assign-bot command for channel-specific bot assignment and @mentions for queries
Native Discord integration: Users mention @Cody for queries within Discord servers (free for all users)
Zapier integration: Connects to 5,000+ apps including Telegram, Facebook Messenger, Google Sheets, Google Docs, WhatsApp (via ecosystem)
Website embedding (3 methods): Shareable links (direct URLs without site modification), inline embeds (widgets within page sections), popup embeds (floating chat bubbles)
REST API v1.0: Full API access on all paid plans with documentation at developers.meetcody.ai
CRITICAL GAPS: No NO Microsoft Teams native integration (Zapier workaround required), No NO WhatsApp Business native integration (Zapier only), No NO Google Drive/Dropbox/Notion native connections
LIMITATION: No NO webhook functionality explicitly documented in API - potential constraint for event-driven architectures and real-time notifications
Omnichannel unified inbox: Website live chat, email ticketing, Facebook Messenger, Instagram DMs, WhatsApp Business API managed in single dashboard
Zapier integration: Connects to 8,000+ apps, available free on all plans for workflow automation
CRM integrations: Salesforce, HubSpot, Zendesk, Pipedrive for customer data sync
E-commerce platforms: Shopify (deep integration with order management, cart preview, product recommendations), WooCommerce, BigCommerce, Wix
Webhooks: Require Plus subscription ($749/month) for bidirectional data sync via Tray.io with real-time event notifications
Marketing tools: Google Analytics, Mailchimp, ActiveCampaign
CRITICAL GAPS: No NO native Slack integration (Zapier notifications only, not bidirectional chat), No NO Microsoft Teams integration, No NO Telegram native support (requires third-party Zapier/Make tools)
Embeds easily—a lightweight script or iframe drops the chat widget into any website or mobile app.
Offers ready-made hooks for Slack, Zendesk, Confluence, YouTube, Sharepoint, 100+ more.
Explore API Integrations
Connects with 5,000+ apps via Zapier and webhooks to automate your workflows.
Supports secure deployments with domain allowlisting and a ChatGPT Plugin for private use cases.
Hosted CustomGPT.ai offers hosted MCP Server with support for Claude Web, Claude Desktop, Cursor, ChatGPT, Windsurf, Trae, etc.
Read more here.
Slack /assign-bot command: Assign specific bots to dedicated channels for departmental organization (e.g., IT bot in #it-support, HR bot in #hr-questions)
Free for all users: Native integrations available even on Free plan ($0/month) vs competitors requiring paid tiers or Zapier workarounds
Discord @Cody mentions: Direct mention-based querying within Discord servers for community support or team collaboration
Context preservation: Conversation history maintained within Slack/Discord threads for multi-turn interactions
Competitive advantage: Zero-friction deployment for Slack/Discord workspaces vs API-based integrations requiring developer involvement (7.5/10 rated differentiator)
Use case fit: Internal documentation assistants, IT support bots, HR policy Q&A within existing communication channels
Automatic citation: Every AI response includes links to exact documents used for generation enabling click-through verification
Source verification interface: Centralized conversation logs allow examination of which documents informed each response for audit trails
Trust building: Users can validate AI answers against source material reducing hallucination concerns and increasing adoption confidence
Knowledge gap identification: Responses lacking sufficient sources highlight areas needing additional training data
Compliance advantage: Source traceability supports regulatory requirements for explainable AI in regulated industries (healthcare, finance, legal)
Competitive positioning: Explicit citation vs black-box responses in competitors positions CODY for accuracy-critical use cases (9/10 rated differentiator)
User feedback: Reviews highlight source attribution as primary trust-building feature reducing manual fact-checking burden
N/A
N/A
Focus Mode ( Core Differentiator)
Targeted context injection: Inject up to 1,000 specific documents into single conversation context vs retrieving from full knowledge base
Use cases: Department-specific queries (HR policies for HR team, engineering docs for dev team), project-scoped assistance, client-specific information isolation
Noise reduction: Constrains retrieval to relevant subset preventing irrelevant information from interfering with responses
API support: Focus Mode available via REST API conversations endpoint with document ID array parameter for programmatic control
Performance advantage: Smaller search space improves retrieval speed and relevance vs full-corpus semantic search
Unique capability: Few RAG platforms offer explicit context scoping at this granularity - most retrieve from entire knowledge base (8.5/10 rated differentiator)
N/A
N/A
Core Chatbot Features
Multilingual support: Build and interact with chatbots in any language with no language restrictions or translation layers
Conversation memory: Context retention with configurable token distribution (e.g., 70% context, 10% history, 20% response) for multi-turn interactions
Conversation history logging: Centralized interface with filtering by bot or date range, tiered retention (14 days Basic, 30 days Premium, 90 days Advanced)
Conversational Interface: Securely upload documents (PowerPoints, PDFs) or crawl entire websites to build company-specific knowledge base and quickly retrieve precise information
Traceable Source Attribution: Every answer comes with traceable sources letting users verify accuracy and track where specific information originated
Prompt templates: Shareable custom prompts with variables across team members for consistent bot behavior
Conversation sharing: Share conversations with team via dedicated sharing option for collaboration and quality review
Scratchpad feature: Save, refine, and use derivatives of AI-generated responses to improve specificity over time with micro-management capabilities
Bot Personality Customization: Complete control over bot personality and description to define how bot presents itself and engages with users when creating new bot
LIMITATION: No NO native lead capture - requires custom implementation via API or Zapier workflows (vs built-in form capture in competitors)
LIMITATION: No NO automated human handoff - escalation achieved only through prompt engineering with manual contact info (no automated queue routing or agent assignment)
LIMITATION: Note: Basic analytics only - conversation logs and usage monitoring without advanced dashboards for funnel analysis or trend identification
Lyro AI (Claude 3): 79-87% success rates (up from 50-70% pre-Claude 3 upgrade) with strict knowledge base boundaries preventing hallucinations beyond provided sources
Lyro Guidance (beta): Tone customization (Neutral/Friendly/Formal), emoji toggles, source link display, custom escalation rules, communication style instructions for brand voice consistency
Human Handoff Logic: Transfer to unassigned queue, keep conversation with rephrasing, or create ticket with email follow-up - preserves full chat history and context for seamless transitions
Smart Insights: AI-generated recommendations for improving metrics based on conversation pattern analysis - identifies optimization opportunities automatically
Live Visitor Tracking: Real-time monitoring with typing preview and conversation takeover capabilities for immediate human intervention when needed
45+ Language Support: Automatic browser-based detection with native multilingual processing (no internal English translation layer reduces accuracy loss)
Visual Flow Builder: Drag-and-drop interface for conversation flows with intent detection nodes, entity extraction, event triggers, variable management, memory retention
NO Anti-Hallucination Controls: Responses cannot be traced to source documents with citations - no citation attribution, source verification, or granular confidence scoring vs RAG platforms
NO Retrieval Parameter Configuration: Users cannot adjust similarity thresholds, implement hybrid search, configure confidence scoring, or tune retrieval mechanisms
Reduces hallucinations by grounding replies in your data and adding source citations for transparency.
Benchmark Details
Handles multi-turn, context-aware chats with persistent history and solid conversation management.
Speaks 90+ languages, making global rollouts straightforward.
Includes extras like lead capture (email collection) and smooth handoff to a human when needed.
Widget Customization & White- Labeling
Header customization: Layout alignment, business logo upload, color schemes, title and subtitle text configuration
Chat interface styling: Message bubble size, background colors, bot and human avatar customization
Composer controls: Placeholder text customization, send button icon selection
Full translation support: Widget UI fully translatable to any language for global deployment consistency
White-labeling (Premium/Advanced): Complete CODY branding removal requires Premium ($99/month) or Advanced ($249/month) - not available on Free/Basic tiers
LIMITATION: No NO domain restriction capabilities documented - cannot limit widget usage to specific domains (security consideration for production deployments)
LIMITATION: Role-based access includes team member limits by tier (3/10/30 members on Basic/Premium/Advanced) with per-chatbot permission enforcement
Visual customization: Live editor with theme presets, color pickers (custom hex supported), logo uploads, position controls (left/right)
Light/dark modes: Built-in theme switching with automatic user preference detection
Custom CSS: Advanced styling via JavaScript SDK for design control beyond presets
Operating hours display: Show availability status to visitors automatically
Mobile responsiveness: Separate mobile widget settings with device-specific hiding options
Domain restrictions: Control which websites can embed widget through trusted domains configuration
Role-based access: Admin, Moderator, and Agent roles with configurable permissions (Growth+ plans) plus agent groups for departmental routing
White-labeling pricing: Note: $20/month addon on Growth tier OR included with Plus ($749+/month) - not available on Free/Starter
Custom avatars: Branded agent avatars and logos require Plus plans minimum
N/A
L L M Model Options
Basic plan: GPT-3.5 Turbo only (1 credit per query)
Enterprise plan: Six LLM providers - Llama 3.1, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5, Mixtral-8x7B, GPT-3.5 Turbo
Credit-based consumption: GPT-3.5 Turbo (1 credit), GPT-3.5 16K (5 credits), GPT-4 (10 credits) per query with transparent per-model costs
API model field: REST API returns 'model' field indicating which LLM generated each response for tracking and analysis
Proprietary optimizations: Scratchpad (micro-managing responses), Template Mode (pre-defined prompts), Reverse Vector Search (merging AI and user responses for relevance)
LIMITATION: No NO automatic model routing - users must manually select models, no dynamic routing based on query complexity or cost optimization (vs intelligent routing in competitors)
LIMITATION: Enterprise-only access to advanced models (Claude 3.5, Gemini 1.5, Llama 3.1) locks out SMBs on lower tiers from latest LLM capabilities
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No Claude 3 LLM ONLY - NO model selection or routing available
Proprietary implementation: Tidio uses Claude 3 combined with proprietary control mechanisms (not publicly documented architecture)
Fixed processing: Cannot switch between GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Gemini, Llama, or custom models based on query complexity or cost optimization
NO BYOLLM: No No bring-your-own-model capabilities for enterprise customization or fine-tuning
Response personalization: Limited to Lyro Guidance instructions (tone, emoji, escalation rules) rather than direct prompt engineering
Competitive gap: Eliminates LLM flexibility entirely vs RAG platforms offering multi-provider model selection (rated 3/10 for model flexibility - major architectural limitation)
Taps into top models—OpenAI’s GPT-5.1 series, GPT-4 series, and even Anthropic’s Claude for enterprise needs (4.5 opus and sonnet, etc ).
Automatically balances cost and performance by picking the right model for each request.
Model Selection Details
Uses proprietary prompt engineering and retrieval tweaks to return high-quality, citation-backed answers.
Handles all model management behind the scenes—no extra API keys or fine-tuning steps for you.
Developer Experience ( A P I & S D Ks)
REST API v1.0: Comprehensive with Bearer token authentication, last updated May 2024
Bots endpoint: List bots with keyword filtering for discovery and management
Conversations endpoint: Full CRUD operations with Focus Mode parameter (inject specific document IDs into context)
Messages endpoint: Send/receive with optional SSE streaming for real-time responses and progressive answer display
Documents endpoint: Upload files (up to 100MB max), create from text/HTML, import webpages programmatically
Folders endpoint: Organizational structure management for knowledge base hierarchy
Uploads endpoint: AWS S3 signed URLs for direct file uploads bypassing API size limits
Rate limiting: Standard headers (x-ratelimit-limit, x-ratelimit-remaining, x-ratelimit-reset, retry-after) with limits viewable in account settings
API changelog: Tracks breaking changes with explicit "Breaking" labels for version management
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO official SDKs for Python, JavaScript, Node.js, or any language - all integrations require direct REST API calls (development friction)
LIMITATION: No NO webhook functionality explicitly documented - limits event-driven architectures and real-time notification patterns
LIMITATION: Documentation quality functional but limited - clear endpoint docs with curl examples and response schemas but lacking tutorials, cookbooks, comprehensive code samples
Three API tiers: Widget SDK (tidioChatAPI - free), OpenAPI REST (Plus $749/month), Webhooks (Plus $749/month)
Widget SDK (free): Controls widget open/close, user identification, event tracking via JavaScript tidioChatAPI interface
OpenAPI (REST): Manages contacts, tickets, conversations, operators with 10-120 requests/minute based on plan (Starter/Growth: 10/min, Plus: 60/min, Premium: 120/min)
Webhooks (Plus+): Real-time event notifications for conversations, tickets, customer satisfaction with 10-second response timeouts
Mobile SDKs: iOS and Android with full Lyro AI support and 15-30 minute implementation time, customizable UI styling within apps
Documentation: developers.tidio.com (beta status) with code snippets and interactive testing but limited depth for advanced use cases
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO official SDKs for any programming language (Python, JavaScript, Node.js) - requires direct HTTP calls to REST API
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO programmatic knowledge management endpoints - cannot upload documents, manage Q&A pairs, or configure knowledge base via API
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO Lyro AI querying API - cannot trigger AI responses or access retrieval endpoints programmatically
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO RAG-specific APIs for semantic search, embedding management, chunking configuration, or retrieval parameters
Support gap: Tidio explicitly states 'cannot provide direct assistance with API implementations' - developer support severely limited
Ships a well-documented REST API for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data, and querying chat.
API Documentation
Backs you up with cookbooks, code samples, and step-by-step guides for every skill level.
R A G Implementation & Accuracy
TRUE RAG architecture: Pinecone vector database (SOC 2 Type II certified) with Amazon S3 document storage and SSE-S3 encryption
Dynamic chunking: Algorithm adjusts chunk size based on token distribution for optimal retrieval (specific parameters not publicly documented)
Relevance Score configuration: Adjustable trade-off between accuracy and completeness for retrieval tuning
Token Distribution control: Split configuration between context, history, and response (e.g., 70% context, 10% history, 20% response) for resource allocation
Persist Prompt feature: Continuous re-emphasis of system prompt for instruction compliance and behavior consistency
Reverse Vector Search: Proprietary technique merging AI and user responses for improved relevance matching
Creativity Settings: Options for "creative," "balanced," or "factual" outputs controlling temperature and generation style
Hallucination mitigation: Source citation with every response enables verification, Focus Mode constrains responses to specific documents reducing irrelevant injection
LIMITATION: No NO published benchmark results or quantitative accuracy metrics - no public validation of RAG performance claims vs competitors
LIMITATION: User reviews note "accuracy relies heavily on the quality of uploaded documents" with occasional struggles reported about document facts
CRITICAL ARCHITECTURAL GAP: No NOT a RAG-as-a-Service platform - lacks vector databases, embedding controls, and configurable retrieval pipelines
Knowledge processing: Q&A extraction from URLs/PDFs/CSVs through opaque internal system without transparency into methodology
NO chunking parameters: No Chunk size, overlap, and strategy not exposed for optimization or tuning
NO embedding model selection: No Cannot choose between OpenAI, Cohere, or custom embedding models for vector generation
NO similarity threshold controls: No Cannot configure cosine similarity thresholds, retrieval scoring, or confidence levels
NO hybrid search: No No combination of keyword and semantic search strategies or BM25 integration
NO anti-hallucination mechanisms: No No citation attribution, source verification, or granular confidence scoring - responses cannot be traced to source documents
Hallucination prevention: Relies solely on strict knowledge base boundaries - Lyro answers only from provided sources and escalates when uncertain
Competitive positioning: Customer service automation platform, NOT autonomous knowledge retrieval system - fundamentally different architecture from RAG platforms (rated 2/10 as RAG platform)
N/A
Performance & Accuracy
Response time: Sub-500ms end-to-end latency target for typical queries on Premium/Advanced plans using GPT-3.5 Turbo (verified from user reports and platform specifications)
Accuracy metrics: No publicly published accuracy benchmarks or F1 scores; user reviews on G2 (4.7/5 stars, 150+ reviews) and Capterra (4.8/5, 50+ reviews) report generally high satisfaction with answer quality when knowledge base is well-curated
Scalability: AWS infrastructure with isolated Kubernetes containers on Enterprise plan supports high-volume deployments; Free plan supports 250 queries/month, scales to "unlimited" on Enterprise with custom infrastructure
Reliability: No public SLA or uptime guarantees on Free/Basic/Premium/Advanced plans; Enterprise plan offers SLA guarantees with dedicated infrastructure (specific uptime % requires sales engagement)
Benchmarks: No published performance benchmarks comparing retrieval speed, accuracy, or latency against competitors (ChatBase, Vectara, CustomGPT); users report "accuracy relies heavily on quality of uploaded documents" with occasional struggles on complex queries
Quality indicators: Source attribution feature enables verification of AI responses; G2 reviews highlight accuracy as strength when knowledge base is comprehensive, with some users noting need for careful prompt engineering
Response time: Real-time chat delivery optimized for sub-second messaging; exact latency benchmarks not publicly disclosed but consistently praised for responsiveness in G2 reviews (4.7/5, 1,600+ reviews)
Accuracy metrics: 79-87% Lyro AI success rate after Claude 3 upgrade (up from 50-70% pre-upgrade); customer case studies report 89-90% automation rates for well-configured implementations (Pizza Hut, Decathlon, Casio)
Context retrieval: Q&A extraction from URLs/PDFs/CSVs with automatic knowledge base building; strict knowledge base boundaries prevent hallucinations; no configurable similarity thresholds or hybrid search strategies exposed
Scalability: 300,000+ businesses served globally demonstrating SMB/e-commerce market fit; infrastructure supports high-volume deployments but per-conversation pricing model ($0.50/Lyro chat) constrains cost scaling vs unlimited usage platforms
Reliability: SLA guarantees on Premium tier ($2,999+/month) with 50% resolution guarantee and uptime commitments; platform stability consistently praised in reviews with "reliable" as common theme
Benchmarks: No published performance benchmarks comparing retrieval speed, accuracy, or latency against competitors; Claude 3 upgrade validation through customer case studies (89-90% automation rates)
Quality indicators: G2 rating 4.7/5 (1,600+ reviews, 68% five-star ratings); users praise ease of use, Shopify integration, visual Flow Builder, but note analytics depth limitations and per-conversation pricing at scale
Delivers sub-second replies with an optimized pipeline—efficient vector search, smart chunking, and caching.
Independent tests rate median answer accuracy at 5/5—outpacing many alternatives.
Benchmark Results
Always cites sources so users can verify facts on the spot.
Maintains speed and accuracy even for massive knowledge bases with tens of millions of words.
Customization & Branding
UI customization: Full widget customization including header layout alignment, message bubble size/colors, background colors, bot and human avatars, composer placeholder text, send button icons
Branding control: Business logo upload, color schemes (header, chat interface, launcher button), title and subtitle text configuration, full translation support for widget UI in any language
White-labeling: Complete removal of Cody branding available on Premium ($99/month) and Advanced ($249/month) plans; Free and Basic plans display Cody branding on widgets
Custom domain: Not explicitly documented in public materials; likely requires Enterprise plan with custom deployment infrastructure (specifics require sales engagement)
Design flexibility: Launcher configuration with size adjustment, screen position (left/right/bottom), custom launcher icons; three embedding methods (shareable links, inline embeds, popup embeds) for flexible deployment
Mobile customization: Responsive widget design adapts to mobile devices; mobile-specific branding controls not separately documented (inherits desktop configuration)
LIMITATION: No documented domain restriction capabilities to limit widget usage to specific domains (security consideration for production deployments)
Role-based access: Team member limits by tier (3/10/30 members on Basic/Premium/Advanced) with per-chatbot permission enforcement and real-time updates
UI customization: Visual live editor with theme presets, color pickers supporting custom hex codes, logo uploads, position controls (left/right), operating hours display automatically showing availability status
Branding control: Light/dark mode built-in theme switching with automatic user preference detection, custom CSS via JavaScript SDK for advanced styling beyond presets
White-labeling: $20/month addon on Growth tier OR included with Plus ($749+/month); not available on Free/Starter plans; custom branded agent avatars and logos require Plus plans minimum
Custom domain: Not explicitly documented in public materials; likely requires Plus or Premium plan with custom deployment infrastructure (specifics require sales engagement)
Design flexibility: Separate mobile widget settings with device-specific hiding options, mobile responsiveness with mobile-specific configuration separate from web widget
Mobile customization: Responsive widget adapts to mobile devices; mobile-specific branding controls inherit desktop configuration; mobile app functionality limitations noted in user reviews
Domain restrictions: Control which websites can embed widget through trusted domains configuration for security
Role-based access: Admin, Moderator, and Agent roles with configurable permissions on Growth+ plans; agent groups for departmental routing enabling organizational structure
Fully white-labels the widget—colors, logos, icons, CSS, everything can match your brand.
White-label Options
Provides a no-code dashboard to set welcome messages, bot names, and visual themes.
Lets you shape the AI’s persona and tone using pre-prompts and system instructions.
Uses domain allowlisting to ensure the chatbot appears only on approved sites.
No- Code Interface & Usability
Visual builder: Three-step bot creation process - (1) add data to knowledge base, (2) define bot purpose/personality, (3) test and share; no drag-and-drop interface, but prompt engineering UI with visual prompt builder including variables and template sharing
Setup complexity: 15-minute bot deployment from account creation to live widget (verified from marketing materials and user reviews); no technical expertise required for basic deployment
Learning curve: User reviews on G2 note "easy to set up" with "intuitive interface," but some users report learning curve for customizing bots to specific business needs despite no-code design; Capterra reviews highlight quick adoption for non-technical teams
Pre-built templates: 11+ templates including Marketing Assistant, HR Chatbot, IT Support, Customer Support, Sales Assistant, Training Bot, Translator AI, Hiring Assistant; each template includes sample prompts, recommended knowledge base content, and example queries
No-code workflows: Model switching (GPT-3.5/GPT-4/Claude/Gemini) without technical reconfiguration; conversation sharing and scratchpad feature for response refinement; testing simulator for pre-launch validation
User experience: G2 rating 4.7/5 (150+ reviews), Capterra 4.8/5 (50+ reviews); users praise ease of deployment and source attribution, note occasional need for prompt engineering expertise to optimize bot behavior
LIMITATION: No drag-and-drop conversation flow builder or visual automation designer like Botpress/Voiceflow; focuses on prompt-based configuration rather than graphical flow design
Visual builder: Drag-and-drop Flow Builder for conversation automation with NLP intent recognition; no programming knowledge required (253 G2 'Ease of Use' mentions)
Setup complexity: 2-minute JavaScript snippet installation for website embedding; consistently praised in reviews for "easy setup" (161 G2 mentions) and rapid deployment
Learning curve: G2 rating 4.7/5 (1,600+ reviews) with "intuitive" interface for non-technical users; designed for business teams without developer resources vs API-centric platforms
Pre-built templates: 40+ pre-built templates for sales, lead generation, support scenarios reducing time-to-deployment; templates include common conversation flows and automation patterns
No-code workflows: Testing simulator validates flows before publishing with built-in emulation preventing production errors; export/import functionality for sharing flows between accounts or backup configurations
User experience: Lyro knowledge setup through simple URL or file upload with AI extracting Q&A pairs automatically - no technical skills required for configuration; HTTP request support (GET, POST, PATCH, PUT, DELETE) within chatbot automation supporting JSON, Text, GraphQL formats with multiple authentication methods
Competitive advantage: SMBs and non-technical teams deploy chatbots in minutes vs hours/days in API-centric platforms (9.5/10 rated differentiator for ease of use)
Offers a wizard-style web dashboard so non-devs can upload content, brand the widget, and monitor performance.
Supports drag-and-drop uploads, visual theme editing, and in-browser chatbot testing.
User Experience Review
Uses role-based access so business users and devs can collaborate smoothly.
Security & Privacy
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No CODY itself NOT SOC 2 certified - Help Center explicitly states "As an early stage startup, we are diligently working towards earning SOC 2 compliance"
Infrastructure compliance: Pinecone vector database (SOC 2 Type II certified), AWS S3 (PCI-DSS, HIPAA/HITECH, FedRAMP, FISMA compliant via AWS certification)
GDPR Compliant: Via AWS infrastructure in EU regions for European data residency and privacy requirements
Document storage: Amazon S3 with SSE-S3 encryption protocol for data at rest, TLS for transit
AI training policy: Customer data explicitly NOT used for training - "Your data will not be used to train any existing or new language model"
OpenAI data retention: API policy ensures data retained maximum 30 days for abuse monitoring only (not for model training)
Access controls: Per-chatbot permissions with real-time updates, API key management, role-based team member access
Enterprise security: Isolated Kubernetes containers on AWS with role-based security and custom infrastructure options
Procurement concern: Lack of direct SOC 2 certification may block enterprise adoption in regulated industries requiring vendor compliance attestations
SOC 2 Type II: Achieved October 2025 through A-LIGN audit covering Security, Availability, and Confidentiality trust criteria
GDPR Compliant: May 2018 certification with designated Data Protection Officer and full subject rights support (access, rectification, erasure, portability)
AWS infrastructure: All customer data resides on AWS in EEA member countries for European data sovereignty
Encryption: TLS 1.2+ with 256-bit SSL for transit, AES-256 for data at rest, irreversible password hashing (no plaintext storage)
Two-factor authentication: TOTP-based 2FA available on all plans for account security
Role-based access control: Admin, Moderator, and Agent roles with configurable permissions on Growth+ plans
SSO: Single sign-on on Enterprise plans for centralized identity management
30-day audit logs: Available on Business plan for compliance tracking and security monitoring
AI data privacy: Lyro conversations NOT used for training public AI models - Anthropic's Claude processes in-session only without persistent data storage
LIMITATION: No NO HIPAA certification - SOC 2 Type II + GDPR only (Tidio indicates working toward healthcare compliance but no timeline)
Protects data in transit with SSL/TLS and at rest with 256-bit AES encryption.
Holds SOC 2 Type II certification and complies with GDPR, so your data stays isolated and private.
Security Certifications
Offers fine-grained access controls—RBAC, two-factor auth, and SSO integration—so only the right people get in.
Observability & Monitoring
Conversation logs: Centralized view of all interactions across interface, API, and website widgets with searchability
Filtering capabilities: By bot or date range for quick access to specific conversation subsets
Source verification: Click-through to examine exact documents used for each response enabling audit trails
Usage tracking: Real-time credit consumption monitoring in dedicated usage tab for cost management
Tiered log retention: 14 days (Basic), 30 days (Premium), 90 days (Advanced) - historical analysis constrained on lower plans
Third-party mentions: Usage pattern monitoring, performance metrics, common question tracking, knowledge gap identification (features lack detailed public documentation)
LIMITATION: Note: Advanced analytics dashboard features mentioned in sources lack public screenshots or comprehensive documentation (transparency gap)
LIMITATION: No NO real-time alerting for conversation volume spikes, error rates, or performance degradation
LIMITATION: No NO funnel analytics or conversion tracking for lead generation use cases
Agent-level performance: Individual response times, handled conversation counts, workload distribution for team optimization
Real-time monitoring: Live visitor lists, typing preview, conversation takeover capabilities for immediate intervention
Lyro-specific analytics: Resolution rates, unanswered questions tracking, knowledge base gap identification for continuous improvement
Smart Insights: AI-generated recommendations for metric improvement based on conversation pattern analysis
Scheduled reports: Daily/weekly/monthly delivery via email with CSV export for custom analysis in external tools
LIMITATION: Note: Analytics depth falls short of enterprise expectations - users report 'helpful but not as detailed as enterprise tools' with limited funnel and flow-level analytics
LIMITATION: No NO AI performance metrics - no retrieval accuracy dashboards, semantic search performance tracking, hallucination rate monitoring (focuses on operational metrics)
Comes with a real-time analytics dashboard tracking query volumes, token usage, and indexing status.
Lets you export logs and metrics via API to plug into third-party monitoring or BI tools.
Analytics API
Provides detailed insights for troubleshooting and ongoing optimization.
15-minute bot deployment: Three-step process - (1) add data to knowledge base, (2) define bot purpose/personality, (3) test and share
11+ pre-built templates: Marketing Assistant, HR Chatbot, IT Support, Customer Support, Sales Assistant, Training Bot, Translator AI, Hiring Assistant
Template components: Sample prompts, recommended knowledge base content, example queries for rapid deployment
Model-agnostic interface: Switch between GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Claude, Gemini without technical reconfiguration
Prompt engineering UI: Visual prompt builder with variables, template sharing across team members, version control
Testing simulator: Test bot responses before publishing with conversation preview and refinement loops
Role-based access: Team member limits (3/10/30 by tier), per-chatbot permission enforcement, real-time permission updates
Target audience advantage: Business teams deploy knowledge assistants without developer resources vs API-centric platforms requiring technical expertise (9/10 rated differentiator for non-technical users)
N/A
N/A
Proprietary R A G Optimizations ( Differentiator)
Scratchpad: Save, refine, and use derivatives of AI-generated responses to improve specificity through micro-management and iterative enhancement
Template Mode: Pre-defined prompts with variables for consistent behavior patterns across conversations and use cases
Reverse Vector Search: Proprietary technique merging AI responses and user inputs for improved relevance matching and context awareness
Dynamic chunking: Algorithm adjusts chunk size based on token distribution rather than fixed-size chunks (adaptive optimization)
Persist Prompt: Continuous re-emphasis of system prompt throughout conversation preventing instruction drift in long conversations
Creativity Settings: Granular control over "creative," "balanced," or "factual" outputs for use-case-specific tone adjustment
Competitive positioning: Proprietary optimizations differentiate from standard RAG implementations but lack published performance benchmarks (7/10 rated differentiator)
N/A
N/A
Pricing & Scalability
Free plan: $0/month - 100 credits, 100 documents, 1 team member, 1 widget, NO API access, NO crawler, monthly query limit 250
Basic plan: $29/month - 2,500 credits, 1,000 documents, 3 team members, 14-day conversation logs, API access, GPT-3.5 only
Plus: $749/month - Custom billable (2,000+ conversations), up to 5,000 Lyro conversations, API access, webhooks, white-labeling, Customer Success Manager
Premium: $2,999+/month - Unlimited billable conversations, up to 10,000 Lyro conversations, 50% resolution guarantee, SLAs, unlimited operators
Per-conversation billing: Lyro AI costs approximately $0.50 per conversation (1 conversation = 1 customer interaction with AI reply, auto-closes after 15 minutes inactivity)
10-operator cap: Note: All self-serve plans (Free through Plus) limited to 10 operators - unlimited seats require Premium tier ($2,999+/month)
API access locked: Note: OpenAPI and Webhooks require Plus plan minimum ($749/month) - unavailable on Free/Starter/Growth tiers
White-labeling cost: Note: $20/month addon on Growth tier OR included with Plus ($749+/month)
Annual savings: ~20% discount when paying annually vs monthly billing
Cost scaling concern: Per-conversation model at $0.50/Lyro chat escalates costs at high volume vs unlimited usage in RAG platforms
Runs on straightforward subscriptions: Standard (~$99/mo), Premium (~$449/mo), and customizable Enterprise plans.
Gives generous limits—Standard covers up to 60 million words per bot, Premium up to 300 million—all at flat monthly rates.
View Pricing
Handles scaling for you: the managed cloud infra auto-scales with demand, keeping things fast and available.
Support & Ecosystem
API documentation: developers.meetcody.ai with endpoint reference, curl examples, response schemas, API changelog with breaking change labels
Help Center: intercom.help/cody/en/ with getting started guides, compliance information, security bulletins
Active Discord community: Peer support and user knowledge sharing for troubleshooting and best practices
Email support: support@meetcody.ai for all users across all plans
Blog: Tutorials and guides for use case implementation and platform features
Advanced plan: Dedicated account manager for onboarding and optimization guidance
Enterprise SLA: Guaranteed response times and uptime commitments (specifics require sales engagement, not publicly documented)
LIMITATION: No NO phone support available on any tier (email and community only)
LIMITATION: No NO live chat support documented for real-time assistance
Documentation quality: Functional but limited - clear endpoint docs and response schemas but lacking tutorials, cookbooks, comprehensive code samples for advanced implementations
User feedback: Reviews note learning curve for customizing bots to specific business needs despite no-code interface
Live chat support: Available with faster response times on higher tiers (24/7 on Plus/Premium)
Email support: All plans with tier-based priority levels
Customer Success Manager: Dedicated CSM on Plus ($749/month) for onboarding and optimization guidance
SLA guarantees: Premium tier ($2,999+/month) with 50% resolution guarantee and uptime commitments
Knowledge base: Self-service articles and video tutorials for common setup and troubleshooting scenarios
User satisfaction: 4.7/5 G2 rating (1,600+ reviews) with support quality consistently praised
LIMITATION: No NO public community forums or user groups for peer support and knowledge sharing
LIMITATION: No NO phone support available on any tier (chat and email only)
Developer support gap: Tidio explicitly states 'cannot provide direct assistance with API implementations' - technical support severely limited for custom integrations
Supplies rich docs, tutorials, cookbooks, and FAQs to get you started fast.
Developer Docs
Offers quick email and in-app chat support—Premium and Enterprise plans add dedicated managers and faster SLAs.
Enterprise Solutions
Benefits from an active user community plus integrations through Zapier and GitHub resources.
R A G-as-a- Service Assessment
Platform classification: TRUE RAG-as-a-Service platform with Pinecone vector database, dynamic chunking, and configurable retrieval parameters
Architecture validation: Amazon S3 (document storage) + Pinecone (embeddings) + multi-LLM support confirms genuine RAG implementation vs chatbot platforms
Target audience: Business teams needing no-code deployment with 15-minute bot creation vs developer-centric platforms requiring technical expertise
Enterprise considerations: Lack of direct SOC 2 certification (infrastructure-partner-only compliance) may block regulated industry adoption requiring vendor attestations
Developer experience: Comprehensive REST API with SSE streaming but NO official SDKs requiring direct HTTP calls vs SDK-equipped platforms
Competitive positioning: Business-focused RAG platform emphasizing no-code deployment and source transparency vs developer-centric platforms with enterprise compliance (rated 7.5/10 as RAG platform)
Platform classification: CUSTOMER SERVICE AUTOMATION PLATFORM with AI assistance, NOT a RAG-as-a-Service platform
Architecture philosophy: Designed for no-code chatbot building and agent productivity enhancement, not autonomous knowledge retrieval
Target audience: SMBs and e-commerce businesses needing easy chatbot deployment vs developers requiring programmatic RAG control
Missing RAG foundations: NO vector database, NO embedding controls, NO LLM model selection, NO anti-hallucination mechanisms, NO retrieval configuration APIs
Knowledge source gap: Limited to URLs, PDFs, CSVs (max 10,000 Q&A entries) vs 1,400+ formats and unlimited scaling in RAG platforms
API focus: Chat operations (contacts, tickets, conversations) vs RAG operations (semantic search, retrieval, embeddings, chunking)
Use case fit: Excellent for SMB customer service automation and e-commerce support, inappropriate for enterprise-scale document retrieval requiring accuracy controls
Competitive positioning: Different category from CustomGPT - customer service automation vs RAG-as-a-Service (rated 2/10 as RAG platform - fundamentally different architecture)
Core Architecture: Serverless RAG infrastructure with automatic embedding generation, vector search optimization, and LLM orchestration fully managed behind API endpoints
API-First Design: Comprehensive REST API with well-documented endpoints for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data (1,400+ formats), and querying chat
API Documentation
Developer Experience: Open-source Python SDK (customgpt-client), Postman collections, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, and extensive cookbooks for rapid integration
No-Code Alternative: Wizard-style web dashboard enables non-developers to upload content, brand widgets, and deploy chatbots without touching code
Hybrid Target Market: Serves both developer teams wanting robust APIs AND business users seeking no-code RAG deployment - unique positioning vs pure API platforms (Cohere) or pure no-code tools (Jotform)
RAG Technology Leadership: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, proprietary anti-hallucination mechanisms, and citation-backed responses
Benchmark Details
Deployment Flexibility: Cloud-hosted SaaS with auto-scaling, API integrations, embedded chat widgets, ChatGPT Plugin support, and hosted MCP Server for Claude/Cursor/ChatGPT
Enterprise Readiness: SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling, domain allowlisting, RBAC with 2FA/SSO, and flat-rate pricing without per-query charges
Use Case Fit: Ideal for organizations needing both rapid no-code deployment AND robust API capabilities, teams handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), and businesses requiring production-ready RAG without building ML infrastructure from scratch
Competitive Positioning: Bridges the gap between developer-first platforms (Cohere, Deepset) requiring heavy coding and no-code chatbot builders (Jotform, Kommunicate) lacking API depth - offers best of both worlds
Competitive Positioning
vs CustomGPT: CODY excels in no-code deployment and source attribution; CustomGPT excels in enterprise compliance (direct SOC 2) and official SDKs
vs Vectara: CODY offers simpler pricing and no-code interface; Vectara provides enterprise-grade accuracy benchmarks and HHEM hallucination detection
vs Pinecone Assistant: Both use Pinecone vector database; CODY differentiates with Focus Mode and business templates; Pinecone Assistant offers deeper infrastructure control
vs ChatBase/SiteGPT: CODY provides TRUE RAG architecture vs simpler chatbot platforms; Focus Mode and multi-LLM support vs single-model implementations
Market niche: Business-focused RAG platform for teams needing no-code deployment with source transparency, NOT developer tool requiring technical implementation
vs CustomGPT: Tidio excels in no-code ease of use and e-commerce integration; CustomGPT excels in RAG architecture and programmatic control
vs Intercom/LiveChat/Zendesk: Tidio competes in customer service automation with comparable features, lower pricing, stronger Shopify integration
vs Drift: Both focus on conversational automation - Tidio emphasizes SMB/e-commerce support, Drift emphasizes enterprise sales teams
vs RAG platforms (Vectara, Pinecone Assistant, Ragie): Fundamentally different architecture - Tidio not designed for autonomous retrieval, lacks RAG infrastructure
Market niche: No-code customer service automation for SMBs and e-commerce with exceptional ease of use (4.7/5 G2), NOT a RAG alternative for knowledge retrieval
Market position: Leading all-in-one RAG platform balancing enterprise-grade accuracy with developer-friendly APIs and no-code usability for rapid deployment
Target customers: Mid-market to enterprise organizations needing production-ready AI assistants, development teams wanting robust APIs without building RAG infrastructure, and businesses requiring 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription (YouTube, podcasts)
Key competitors: OpenAI Assistants API, Botsonic, Chatbase.co, Azure AI, and custom RAG implementations using LangChain
Competitive advantages: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling included, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, hosted MCP Server support (Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT), generous data limits (60M words Standard, 300M Premium), and flat monthly pricing without per-query charges
Pricing advantage: Transparent flat-rate pricing at $99/month (Standard) and $449/month (Premium) with generous included limits; no hidden costs for API access, branding removal, or basic features; best value for teams needing both no-code dashboard and developer APIs in one platform
Use case fit: Ideal for businesses needing both rapid no-code deployment and robust API capabilities, organizations handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), teams requiring white-label chatbots with source citations for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects, and companies wanting all-in-one RAG without managing ML infrastructure
Customer Base & Case Studies
Scale claim: 100,000+ businesses served (unverified, company-provided claim)
Acquisition: Acquired by Just Build It in May 2024 demonstrating market validation and growth trajectory
Use case examples: Customer support automation, HR policy Q&A, IT support documentation, sales enablement, internal knowledge management, training assistants
Target market: SMBs and mid-market companies seeking knowledge base automation without dedicated AI/ML engineering resources
User feedback themes: Ease of deployment praised, source attribution valued for trust, accuracy concerns noted for complex document sets
Common use cases: "AI virtual employee" positioning for customer support, HR, IT support, sales assistance, marketing, training, and hiring workflows
Scale: 300,000+ businesses served globally demonstrating SMB/e-commerce market fit
Named customers: Pizza Hut (89-90% automation rates), Decathlon, Casio (enterprise validation)
WordPress adoption: 60,000+ plugin installations demonstrate strong small business penetration
User satisfaction: 4.7/5 G2 rating (1,600+ reviews) with 68% five-star ratings
Review themes - Praise: Ease of use (253 mentions), easy setup (161 mentions), Shopify integration, visual Flow Builder, responsive support
Review themes - Criticisms: Analytics depth limitations, per-conversation pricing at scale, API access locked to Plus tier ($749/month), 10-operator cap on self-serve plans
Claude 3 upgrade impact: Success rates jumped from 50-70% to 79-87% with customer case studies reporting 89-90% automation after upgrade
N/A
Company Background
Acquisition: Acquired by Just Build It in May 2024 (acquisition terms undisclosed)
Credit-Based Consumption: GPT-3.5 Turbo (1 credit), GPT-3.5 16K (5 credits), GPT-4 (10 credits) per query with transparent per-model costs
Model-Agnostic Architecture: Users stay current with latest LLM updates without retraining bots; bring your own API key for supported LLMs (Claude, Mistral, GPT, Gemini)
Claude 3 Default: Defaults to Claude 3 from Anthropic for code generation, autocomplete, and chat features vs competitors relying solely on GPT models
LIMITATION: No automatic model routing based on query complexity or cost optimization - users must manually select models
Fixed Claude 3 implementation: Lyro AI exclusively powered by Anthropic's Claude 3 with proprietary control mechanisms - no model selection available
Model selection rationale: Claude chosen for being "developed with the goal of becoming helpful, honest, and harmless" - explicit decision prioritizing safety over GPT alternatives
Success rate improvement: 79-87% automation rate after Claude 3 upgrade (up from 50-70% with pre-Claude 3 models) demonstrating significant performance gains
Customer automation rates: Case studies report 89-90% automation for well-configured implementations (Pizza Hut, Decathlon, Casio validation)
CRITICAL LIMITATION: NO model switching: Cannot switch between GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Gemini, Llama, or custom models based on query complexity or cost optimization needs
CRITICAL LIMITATION: NO BYOLLM: No bring-your-own-model capabilities for enterprise customization or fine-tuning on proprietary data
CRITICAL LIMITATION: NO automatic routing: No intelligent model routing, fallback strategies, or load balancing across different LLM providers
Response personalization limits: Customization restricted to Lyro Guidance instructions (tone, emoji, escalation rules) rather than direct prompt engineering or system prompts
Competitive gap: Eliminates LLM flexibility entirely vs RAG platforms offering multi-provider model selection (rated 3/10 for model flexibility - major architectural limitation)
Primary models: GPT-5.1 and 4 series from OpenAI, and Anthropic's Claude 4.5 (opus and sonnet) for enterprise needs
Automatic model selection: Balances cost and performance by automatically selecting the appropriate model for each request
Model Selection Details
Proprietary optimizations: Custom prompt engineering and retrieval enhancements for high-quality, citation-backed answers
Managed infrastructure: All model management handled behind the scenes - no API keys or fine-tuning required from users
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms ensure chatbot only answers based on provided content, improving trust and factual accuracy
R A G Capabilities
TRUE RAG Architecture: Pinecone vector database (SOC 2 Type II certified) with Amazon S3 document storage using SSE-S3 encryption protocol
Dynamic Chunking Algorithm: Adjusts chunk size based on token distribution for optimal retrieval performance (specific parameters not publicly documented)
Relevance Score Configuration: Adjustable trade-off between accuracy and completeness for retrieval tuning
Token Distribution Control: Split configuration between context, history, and response (e.g., 70% context, 10% history, 20% response)
Reverse Vector Search: Proprietary technique merging AI and user responses for improved relevance matching
Context Window: Claude 2 integration provides up to 100K context windows for comprehensive codebase analysis
Advanced Chunking: Comprehensive data segmentation including metadata for superior data management across various file formats
LIMITATION: No published benchmark results or quantitative accuracy metrics for RAG performance validation
CRITICAL ARCHITECTURAL GAP: NOT a RAG-as-a-Service platform: Lacks vector databases, embedding controls, and configurable retrieval pipelines found in true RAG systems
Q&A extraction system: Automatic Q&A pair generation from URLs/PDFs/CSVs through opaque internal processing - methodology not publicly documented
Knowledge base boundaries: Strict knowledge base boundaries prevent hallucinations - Lyro answers only from provided sources and automatically escalates when uncertain
NO chunking parameters exposed: Chunk size, overlap strategy, and chunking methodology not accessible for optimization or tuning
NO embedding model selection: Cannot choose between OpenAI, Cohere, custom embedding models, or configure embedding dimensions
NO similarity threshold controls: Cannot configure cosine similarity thresholds, retrieval scoring, confidence levels, or top-k results
NO hybrid search: No combination of keyword (BM25) and semantic search strategies or configurable weighting between approaches
NO anti-hallucination mechanisms: No citation attribution, source verification, or granular confidence scoring - responses cannot be traced to specific source documents
NO retrieval APIs: No programmatic access to semantic search, embedding management, or retrieval endpoints - knowledge management UI-only
Competitive positioning: Customer service automation platform with AI assistance, NOT autonomous knowledge retrieval system - fundamentally different architecture from RAG platforms (rated 2/10 as RAG platform)
Core architecture: GPT-4 combined with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology, outperforming OpenAI in RAG benchmarks
RAG Performance
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms reduce hallucinations and ensure responses are grounded in provided content
Benchmark Details
Automatic citations: Each response includes clickable citations pointing to original source documents for transparency and verification
Optimized pipeline: Efficient vector search, smart chunking, and caching for sub-second reply times
Scalability: Maintains speed and accuracy for massive knowledge bases with tens of millions of words
Context-aware conversations: Multi-turn conversations with persistent history and comprehensive conversation management
Source verification: Always cites sources so users can verify facts on the spot
Use Cases
Primary Departments: Marketing teams (creative strategies, campaign insights), HR departments (employee communication, query management), IT support (technical troubleshooting), Sales departments (AI-driven assistance)
Internal Operations: Answering internal or customer FAQs automatically, training new team members with AI support, generating reports/email replies/summaries using company data, searching thousands of documents instantly
Code Assistance: Engineers saving 5-6 hours per week, writing code 2x faster with AI-powered context-aware code generation and autocomplete
Industries: Financial services (trusted by 4/6 top US banks), technology companies (7/10 top public tech companies), healthcare, professional service firms, government agencies (15+ US agencies)
Team Sizes: Startups managing internal documentation to enterprises coordinating teams across regions; 100,000+ businesses served globally
Educational Use Cases: Educational institutions training students in AI applications, legal firms organizing and retrieving case documents
SMB customer service automation: Perfect for small-to-medium businesses needing easy chatbot deployment for basic support queries (4.7/5 G2 rating, 1,600+ reviews)
E-commerce support: Deep Shopify/WooCommerce integration for order management, cart recovery, and product recommendations - 60,000+ WordPress installations demonstrate e-commerce fit
Multi-channel support: Unified inbox for website live chat, Facebook Messenger, Instagram DMs, WhatsApp Business API, email ticketing (omnichannel deployment)
No-code chatbot building: Visual Flow Builder with 40+ templates enables non-technical teams to deploy chatbots in minutes without developer resources
Lead generation and qualification: Capture visitor information, qualify leads through conversation flows, sync to CRM platforms (Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive)
NOT ideal for: Enterprise-scale document retrieval requiring accuracy controls, RAG applications needing semantic search and embedding configuration, or knowledge-intensive use cases requiring citation validation
NOT ideal for: Organizations requiring programmatic knowledge management APIs, LLM model flexibility (GPT-4/Gemini switching), or advanced RAG features (hybrid search, reranking, query expansion)
NOT ideal for: High-volume automation (per-conversation pricing at $0.50/chat escalates costs vs unlimited usage platforms), teams needing more than 10 operators (Premium tier required at $2,999+/month)
Customer support automation: AI assistants handling common queries, reducing support ticket volume, providing 24/7 instant responses with source citations
Internal knowledge management: Employee self-service for HR policies, technical documentation, onboarding materials, company procedures across 1,400+ file formats
Sales enablement: Product information chatbots, lead qualification, customer education with white-labeled widgets on websites and apps
Documentation assistance: Technical docs, help centers, FAQs with automatic website crawling and sitemap indexing
Educational platforms: Course materials, research assistance, student support with multimedia content (YouTube transcriptions, podcasts)
Healthcare information: Patient education, medical knowledge bases (SOC 2 Type II compliant for sensitive data)
E-commerce: Product recommendations, order assistance, customer inquiries with API integration to 5,000+ apps via Zapier
SaaS onboarding: User guides, feature explanations, troubleshooting with multi-agent support for different teams
Security & Compliance
CRITICAL LIMITATION: Cody itself NOT SOC 2 certified - "As an early stage startup, we are diligently working towards earning SOC 2 compliance"
Infrastructure Compliance: Pinecone vector database (SOC 2 Type II certified), AWS S3 (PCI-DSS, HIPAA/HITECH, FedRAMP, FISMA compliant via AWS certification)
GDPR Compliant: Via AWS infrastructure in EU regions for European data residency and privacy requirements; Data Processing Addendums available
Document Encryption: Amazon S3 with SSE-S3 encryption protocol for data at rest, TLS for transit
AI Training Policy: Customer data explicitly NOT used for training - "Your data will not be used to train any existing or new language model"
OpenAI Data Retention: API policy ensures data retained maximum 30 days for abuse monitoring only (not for model training)
Access Controls: Per-chatbot permissions with real-time updates, API key management, role-based team member access
Enterprise Security: Isolated Kubernetes containers on AWS with role-based security and custom infrastructure options
Procurement Concern: Lack of direct SOC 2 certification may block enterprise adoption in regulated industries requiring vendor compliance attestations
SOC 2 Type II certified: Achieved October 2025 through A-LIGN audit covering Security, Availability, and Confidentiality trust criteria - demonstrates enterprise-grade security controls
GDPR Compliant: May 2018 certification with designated Data Protection Officer and full subject rights support (access, rectification, erasure, portability, restriction)
AWS infrastructure: All customer data resides on AWS in EEA member countries for European data sovereignty and GDPR compliance
Encryption standards: TLS 1.2+ with 256-bit SSL for data in transit, AES-256 for data at rest, irreversible password hashing (no plaintext storage)
Two-factor authentication: TOTP-based 2FA available on all plans for account security hardening
Role-based access control: Admin, Moderator, and Agent roles with configurable permissions on Growth+ plans; agent groups for departmental routing
SSO: Single sign-on available on Enterprise plans for centralized identity management and authentication
30-day audit logs: Available on Business plan for compliance tracking, security monitoring, and incident investigation
AI data privacy: Lyro conversations NOT used for training public AI models - Anthropic's Claude processes in-session only without persistent data storage or model training
LIMITATION: NO HIPAA certification: SOC 2 Type II + GDPR only - Tidio indicates working toward healthcare compliance but no timeline or BAA availability
LIMITATION: Limited compliance scope: No ISO 27001, PCI DSS Level 1, or FedRAMP certifications limiting adoption in regulated industries beyond basic GDPR
Encryption: SSL/TLS for data in transit, 256-bit AES encryption for data at rest
SOC 2 Type II certification: Industry-leading security standards with regular third-party audits
Security Certifications
GDPR compliance: Full compliance with European data protection regulations, ensuring data privacy and user rights
Access controls: Role-based access control (RBAC), two-factor authentication (2FA), SSO integration for enterprise security
Data isolation: Customer data stays isolated and private - platform never trains on user data
Domain allowlisting: Ensures chatbot appears only on approved sites for security and brand protection
Secure deployments: ChatGPT Plugin support for private use cases with controlled access
Pricing & Plans
Free Plan: $0/month - 100 credits (250 queries/month), 100 documents, 1 team member, 1 widget, NO API access, NO crawler
Basic Plan: $29/month - 2,500 credits, 1,000 documents, 3 team members, 14-day conversation logs, API access, GPT-3.5 only
Growth: $59-$349/month - 250-2,000 billable conversations, Lyro separate addon, advanced analytics, Shopify actions, 10 operators, agent groups
Plus: $749/month - Custom billable (2,000+ conversations), up to 5,000 Lyro conversations, API access, webhooks, white-labeling, Customer Success Manager, 10 operators
Premium: $2,999+/month - Unlimited billable conversations, up to 10,000 Lyro conversations, 50% resolution guarantee, SLAs, unlimited operators, dedicated support
Lyro AI pricing: Approximately $0.50 per conversation (1 conversation = 1 customer interaction with AI reply, auto-closes after 15 minutes inactivity) - separate addon on Growth tier
10-operator cap NOTE: All self-serve plans (Free through Plus) limited to 10 operators - unlimited seats require Premium tier ($2,999+/month) blocking team scalability
API access locked: OpenAPI REST endpoints and Webhooks require Plus plan minimum ($749/month) - unavailable on Free/Starter/Growth tiers limiting integration options
White-labeling cost: $20/month addon on Growth tier OR included with Plus ($749+/month) - not available on Free/Starter plans
Annual savings: Approximately 20% discount when paying annually vs monthly billing across all tiers
Cost scaling concern: Per-conversation model at $0.50/Lyro chat escalates costs significantly at high volume vs unlimited usage in RAG platforms - $500/month for 1,000 AI conversations
Standard Plan: $99/month or $89/month annual - 10 custom chatbots, 5,000 items per chatbot, 60 million words per bot, basic helpdesk support, standard security
View Pricing
Premium Plan: $499/month or $449/month annual - 100 custom chatbots, 20,000 items per chatbot, 300 million words per bot, advanced support, enhanced security, additional customization
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing - Comprehensive AI solutions, highest security and compliance, dedicated account managers, custom SSO, token authentication, priority support with faster SLAs
Enterprise Solutions
7-Day Free Trial: Full access to Standard features without charges - available to all users
Annual billing discount: Save 10% by paying upfront annually ($89/mo Standard, $449/mo Premium)
Flat monthly rates: No per-query charges, no hidden costs for API access or white-labeling (included in all plans)
Managed infrastructure: Auto-scaling cloud infrastructure included - no additional hosting or scaling fees
Support & Documentation
API Documentation: developers.meetcody.ai with endpoint reference, curl examples, response schemas, API changelog with breaking change labels
Help Center: intercom.help/cody/en/ with getting started guides, compliance information, security bulletins
Community Support: Active Discord community for peer support, troubleshooting, and best practices; GitHub discussions for developer engagement
Email Support: support@meetcody.ai available for all users across all plans
Response Times: Generally praised for responsiveness; Advanced plan includes dedicated account manager for onboarding and optimization guidance
Learning Resources: Blog with tutorials and guides for use case implementation and platform features
Enterprise SLA: Guaranteed response times and uptime commitments (specifics require sales engagement, not publicly documented)
LIMITATION: NO phone support or live chat on any tier (email and community only)
Documentation Quality: Functional but limited - clear endpoint docs with response schemas but lacking tutorials, cookbooks, comprehensive code samples for advanced implementations
Live chat support: Available on all plans with tier-based response times (24/7 on Plus/Premium vs business hours on lower tiers)
Email support: All plans with priority levels based on subscription tier - fastest response on Premium
Customer Success Manager: Dedicated CSM on Plus ($749/month) for onboarding guidance, optimization strategy, and ongoing consultation
SLA guarantees: Premium tier ($2,999+/month) with 50% resolution guarantee and uptime commitments for mission-critical deployments
Knowledge base: Self-service articles and video tutorials for common setup scenarios, troubleshooting guides, and feature configuration
User satisfaction: 4.7/5 G2 rating (1,600+ reviews) with support quality consistently praised; 68% five-star ratings demonstrate high satisfaction
LIMITATION: NO public community forums: No user community, Slack workspace, or Discord server for peer support and knowledge sharing among users
LIMITATION: NO phone support: No phone support available on any tier (chat and email only) limiting support options for urgent issues
Developer support gap: Tidio explicitly states 'cannot provide direct assistance with API implementations' - technical support severely limited for custom integrations requiring code
Documentation hub: Rich docs, tutorials, cookbooks, FAQs, API references for rapid onboarding
Developer Docs
Email and in-app support: Quick support via email and in-app chat for all users
Premium support: Premium and Enterprise plans include dedicated account managers and faster SLAs
Code samples: Cookbooks, step-by-step guides, and examples for every skill level
API Documentation
Real-Time Knowledge Updates: Always available manual retraining for immediate knowledge base updates across all plans
Automatic Syncing: Limited to website sources only with recurring re-imports - not available for uploaded documents
Bot Personality Customization: Create custom conversation starters tailored to specific tasks, adjust behavior, tone, and focus to suit each use case
Focus Mode: Generate highly specialized responses based on selected documents for targeted tasks with up to 1,000 specific documents injected into conversation context
Scratchpad for Fine-Tuning: Fine-tune bot responses and knowledge base interactions improving accuracy and relevance of future responses
Custom Prompts: Define bot purpose and personality during creation with shareable prompt templates across team members
Configurable Token Distribution: Adjust split between context, history, and response (e.g., 70% context, 10% history, 20% response)
LIMITATION: No NO programmatic personality management - tone/behavior settings dashboard-only, cannot modify per-user or via API (global configuration only)
LIMITATION: Knowledge base updates require manual intervention - no real-time sync from cloud sources (Google Drive, Dropbox, Notion) except website crawling
Knowledge Base Building: URL crawling (500 URLs expandable on Plus), PDF uploads, CSV imports (max 500 entries/file, 10,000 total Q&A limit), manual Q&A creation, Zendesk Help Center article import
Automatic Weekly Re-Sync: Website source updates available on Plus/Premium plans ensuring knowledge stays current without manual refresh
Continuous Q&A Suggestions: System suggests new pairs from unanswered questions and historical conversations requiring manual review before activation
Behavior Customization: Lyro Guidance enables tone (Neutral/Friendly/Formal), emoji toggles, escalation rules, communication style instructions without coding requirements
Visual Flow Builder: No-code workflow creation with real-time testing simulator, one-click deployment, automatic versioning with rollback capabilities for rapid iteration
HTTP Request Support: GET, POST, PATCH, PUT, DELETE within chatbot automation supporting JSON, Text, GraphQL formats with multiple authentication methods
40+ Pre-Built Templates: Sales, lead generation, support scenarios reduce time-to-deployment with industry-specific conversation flows
Widget Customization: Visual live editor with theme presets, color pickers (custom hex), logo uploads, position controls (left/right), operating hours display
CRITICAL LIMITATION - Opaque Q&A Extraction: Knowledge processing methodology not publicly documented - no transparency into chunking strategies, embedding models, or retrieval mechanisms
CRITICAL LIMITATION - NO Programmatic Knowledge API: Cannot upload documents, manage Q&A pairs, or configure knowledge base via API - all data ingestion requires UI-based management
CRITICAL LIMITATION - 10,000 Q&A Entry Limit: Hard cap on knowledge base size vs unlimited in RAG platforms constrains large-scale deployments
Lets you add, remove, or tweak content on the fly—automatic re-indexing keeps everything current.
Shapes agent behavior through system prompts and sample Q&A, ensuring a consistent voice and focus.
Learn How to Update Sources
Supports multiple agents per account, so different teams can have their own bots.
Balances hands-on control with smart defaults—no deep ML expertise required to get tailored behavior.
Additional Considerations
Accuracy Heavily Data-Dependent: Response quality relies on quality and comprehensiveness of uploaded knowledge base - "accuracy relies heavily on quality of uploaded documents"
Learning Curve Exists: Initial setup and customization can be complex for new users despite "easy to set up" reputation - learning curve for customizing bots to specific business needs
Limited Complex Coding: Performs well for simple tasks but struggles with deeper logic, scalability issues, or nuanced multi-step coding challenges
Data Quality Critical: Occasional struggles with document facts - difficulty counting references, performing word counts, handling complex document sets
Cost for Small Businesses: Advanced features and Enterprise-only access (Claude 3.5, Gemini 1.5, Llama 3.1) expensive for smaller businesses
White-Label Minimum: Complete Cody branding removal requires Premium ($99/month) or Advanced ($249/month) - not available on Free/Basic tiers
Performance with Large Data: Speed may slow with large datasets or complex codebases on less powerful systems; requires stable internet (cloud-based)
Compliance Gap: Cody itself NOT SOC 2 certified as early-stage startup "diligently working towards earning SOC 2 compliance" - may block enterprise procurement
Infrastructure Compliance Only: Pinecone (SOC 2 Type II), AWS S3 (PCI-DSS, HIPAA/HITECH, FedRAMP) certified but Cody platform not directly certified
Best For: Business teams needing no-code deployment with 15-minute bot creation and source transparency for internal knowledge management
NOT Ideal For: Enterprises requiring direct SOC 2 vendor certification, native cloud storage sync, YouTube content ingestion, or deep technical problem-solving
Platform Classification: CUSTOMER SERVICE AUTOMATION PLATFORM with AI assistance, NOT a RAG-as-a-Service platform - designed for no-code chatbot building and agent productivity
Target Audience Fit: SMBs and e-commerce businesses needing easy chatbot deployment without developer dependency vs enterprises requiring programmatic RAG control
Primary Strength: Exceptional ease of use (4.7/5 G2, 253 'Ease of Use' mentions) with Visual Flow Builder enabling non-technical teams to deploy chatbots in minutes vs hours/days in API-centric platforms
Claude 3 AI Performance: 79-87% success rates (up from 50-70% pre-Claude 3 upgrade) with customer case studies reporting 89-90% automation for well-configured implementations (Pizza Hut, Decathlon, Casio)
Multilingual Excellence: 45+ languages with native processing (no internal English translation layer) and automatic browser detection reduces accuracy loss vs translation-based competitors
Shopify Integration Depth: Order management, cart preview/recovery, product catalog access directly from chat interface - 60,000+ WordPress installations validate e-commerce market fit
CRITICAL LIMITATION - NOT a RAG Platform: Missing RAG foundations (NO vector database, NO embedding controls, NO LLM model selection, NO anti-hallucination mechanisms, NO retrieval configuration APIs)
CRITICAL LIMITATION - Knowledge Source Gap: Limited to URLs, PDFs, CSVs with 10,000 Q&A entry limit vs unlimited documents and 1,400+ formats in RAG platforms
CRITICAL LIMITATION - Fixed Claude 3 Model: NO model selection, routing, or BYOLLM capabilities - eliminates LLM flexibility entirely (rated 3/10 for model flexibility)
API Limitations: OpenAPI and Webhooks require Plus plan minimum ($749/month) - unavailable on Free/Starter/Growth tiers limiting integration options
Cost Scaling Concern: Per-conversation model at $0.50/Lyro chat escalates quickly at high volume (1,000 AI conversations = $500/month) vs unlimited usage platforms
10-Operator Cap: All self-serve plans limited to 10 operators until Premium tier ($2,999+/month) restricting team scalability for growing businesses
Use Case Mismatch: Excellent for SMB customer service automation and e-commerce support; inappropriate for enterprise-scale document retrieval requiring accuracy controls
Slashes engineering overhead with an all-in-one RAG platform—no in-house ML team required.
Gets you to value quickly: launch a functional AI assistant in minutes.
Stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements, so you’re always on the latest tech.
Balances top-tier accuracy with ease of use, perfect for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects.
Limitations & Considerations
Learning Curve: Initial setup and customization complex for new users; G2 users note "easy to set up" but learning curve exists for customizing bots to specific business needs despite no-code design
Accuracy Dependencies: Response quality heavily relies on quality and comprehensiveness of uploaded knowledge base; user reviews note "accuracy relies heavily on quality of uploaded documents" with occasional struggles on complex queries
Complex Coding Challenges: Limited ability to handle complex, multi-step coding challenges; performs well for simple tasks but struggles with deeper logic, scalability issues, or nuanced coding questions
Data Quality Critical: Occasional struggles with facts about documents - difficulty counting references, performing word counts, handling complex document sets
NO YouTube Transcripts: Cannot ingest video content from YouTube for training
NO Native Cloud Integrations: Google Drive, Dropbox, Notion connections only via Zapier (adds friction vs direct OAuth)
Performance Issues: Performance speed may slow with large datasets or complex codebases on less powerful systems; requires stable internet connection (cloud-based)
Cost Considerations: Advanced features and Enterprise-only access (Claude 3.5, Gemini 1.5, Llama 3.1) can be expensive for smaller businesses; white-labeling requires Premium ($99/month) minimum
NOT Ideal For: Enterprises requiring direct SOC 2 certification (infrastructure-only compliance may block procurement), teams needing deep technical problem-solving for critical systems without traditional development practices, organizations needing native cloud storage sync or YouTube content ingestion
NOT a RAG platform: Customer service automation platform, NOT RAG-as-a-Service - lacks vector databases, embedding controls, configurable retrieval pipelines (rated 2/10 as RAG alternative)
Limited knowledge sources: Restricted to URLs, PDFs, CSVs with 10,000 Q&A entry limit vs unlimited documents and 1,400+ formats in RAG platforms
No programmatic knowledge API: Cannot upload documents, manage Q&A pairs, or configure knowledge base via API - all knowledge management requires UI interaction
No Lyro AI querying API: Cannot trigger AI responses or access retrieval endpoints programmatically - API limited to chat operations (contacts, tickets, conversations)
Fixed Claude 3 model: NO model selection, routing, or BYOLLM capabilities - eliminates LLM flexibility entirely (rated 3/10 for model flexibility)
Analytics depth limitations: Users report analytics "helpful but not as detailed as enterprise tools" with limited funnel and flow-level analytics vs specialized platforms
No AI performance metrics: No retrieval accuracy dashboards, semantic search performance tracking, hallucination rate monitoring, or confidence scoring visibility
Per-conversation pricing scaling: $0.50/Lyro chat costs escalate quickly at high volumes (1,000 AI conversations = $500/month) vs unlimited usage competitors
10-operator cap constraint: Self-serve plans limited to 10 operators until Premium tier ($2,999+/month) restricting team scalability for growing businesses
No native Slack/Teams integration: Only Zapier notifications available - no bidirectional chat or native bot deployment in workplace messaging platforms
Knowledge Base accuracy concerns: Opaque Q&A extraction methodology without retrieval parameter controls or hybrid search capabilities limiting accuracy vs specialized RAG platforms
Managed service approach: Less control over underlying RAG pipeline configuration compared to build-your-own solutions like LangChain
Vendor lock-in: Proprietary platform - migration to alternative RAG solutions requires rebuilding knowledge bases
Model selection: Limited to OpenAI (GPT-5.1 and 4 series) and Anthropic (Claude, opus and sonnet 4.5) - no support for other LLM providers (Cohere, AI21, open-source models)
Pricing at scale: Flat-rate pricing may become expensive for very high-volume use cases (millions of queries/month) compared to pay-per-use models
Customization limits: While highly configurable, some advanced RAG techniques (custom reranking, hybrid search strategies) may not be exposed
Language support: Supports 90+ languages but performance may vary for less common languages or specialized domains
Real-time data: Knowledge bases require re-indexing for updates - not ideal for real-time data requirements (stock prices, live inventory)
Enterprise features: Some advanced features (custom SSO, token authentication) only available on Enterprise plan with custom pricing
Shopify Deep Integration ( Core Differentiator)
N/A
Order management: View customer order history, track shipments, process refunds directly from chat interface without leaving conversation
Cart preview and recovery: See abandoned carts, send automated recovery messages, provide product recommendations based on browsing
Product catalog access: Search and display products from Shopify store within chat with images, pricing, and direct purchase links
Customer data sync: Automatic synchronization of customer profiles, purchase history, preferences for personalized support
Competitive positioning: Deep Shopify/WooCommerce capabilities vs RAG platforms' generic web integrations position Tidio strongly for e-commerce use cases
No-code automation: Drag-and-drop interface for conversation flow creation without programming knowledge (253 G2 'Ease of Use' mentions)
40+ pre-built templates: Sales, lead generation, support scenarios reduce time-to-deployment for common use cases
Testing simulator: Validate flows before publishing with built-in emulation preventing production errors
Export/import functionality: Share flows between accounts or backup configurations for versioning
HTTP request support: GET, POST, PATCH, PUT, DELETE within chatbot automation supporting JSON, Text, GraphQL formats with multiple authentication methods
Target audience advantage: Non-technical business users can deploy chatbots in minutes vs developer-required platforms (9/10 rated differentiator for SMBs)
User feedback: G2 reviews cite 'Easy Setup' (161 mentions) and 'intuitive' workflow design as primary strengths
N/A
Core Agent Features
N/A
Lyro AI (Claude 3): 79-87% success rates (up from 50-70% pre-Claude 3 upgrade) with strict knowledge base boundaries preventing hallucinations
Lyro Guidance (beta): Tone customization (Neutral/Friendly/Formal), emoji toggles, source link display, custom escalation rules, communication style instructions
Human handoff: Transfer to unassigned queue, keep conversation with rephrasing, or create ticket with email follow-up - preserves full chat history and context
Smart Insights: AI-generated recommendations for improving metrics based on conversation analysis
Live visitor tracking: Real-time monitoring with typing preview and conversation takeover capabilities
45+ language support: Automatic browser-based detection with native multilingual processing (no internal English translation layer)
LIMITATION: No NO anti-hallucination controls beyond knowledge base boundaries - responses cannot be traced to source documents with citations (vs RAG platforms)
LIMITATION: No NO retrieval parameter configuration - users cannot adjust similarity thresholds, implement hybrid search, or configure confidence scoring
Custom AI Agents: Build autonomous agents powered by GPT-4 and Claude that can perform tasks independently and make real-time decisions based on business knowledge
Decision-Support Capabilities: AI agents analyze proprietary data to provide insights, recommendations, and actionable responses specific to your business domain
Multi-Agent Systems: Deploy multiple specialized AI agents that can collaborate and optimize workflows in areas like customer support, sales, and internal knowledge management
Memory & Context Management: Agents maintain conversation history and persistent context for coherent multi-turn interactions
View Agent Documentation
Tool Integration: Agents can trigger actions, integrate with external APIs via webhooks, and connect to 5,000+ apps through Zapier for automated workflows
Hyper-Accurate Responses: Leverages advanced RAG technology and retrieval mechanisms to deliver context-aware, citation-backed responses grounded in your knowledge base
Continuous Learning: Agents improve over time through automatic re-indexing of knowledge sources and integration of new data without manual retraining
Claude 3 A I Performance ( Differentiator)
N/A
Model selection rationale: Anthropic's Claude chosen for being "developed with the goal of becoming helpful, honest, and harmless" - explicit decision over GPT
Success rate improvement: Jumped from 50-70% to 79-87% after Claude 3 upgrade demonstrating significant model advancement
Customer automation rates: Case studies report 89-90% automation for well-configured implementations (Pizza Hut, Decathlon, Casio use cases)
Hallucination prevention: Strict knowledge base boundaries - Lyro answers only from provided sources and automatically escalates when uncertain
Privacy advantage: Anthropic processes conversations in-session only without saving data unnecessarily vs competitors using data for training
LIMITATION: No Fixed Claude 3 implementation - NO model switching, NO automatic routing, NO GPT/Gemini/custom model options (7/10 rated as limitation vs flexible RAG platforms)
N/A
Ease of Use & No- Code Interface ( Core Differentiator)
N/A
User satisfaction: 4.7/5 G2 rating with 1,600+ reviews citing exceptional usability as primary strength
45+ languages: English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Norwegian, Polish, plus 35+ additional languages
Native processing: Lyro processes data sources directly in original language without internal English translation layer (reduces accuracy loss)
Automatic browser detection: Switches widget to visitor locale based on browser settings for seamless user experience
Multiple language packs: Allow department routing to language-specific teams for specialized support
Language limiting: Administrators can restrict which languages Lyro uses and set fallback behaviors for unsupported languages
20+ pre-translated packs: Chat widget language packs with manual translation options for additional coverage
Global reach advantage: Single knowledge base serves multiple languages vs competitors requiring separate configurations per locale (7.5/10 rated differentiator)
After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both CODY AI and Tidio are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.
When to Choose CODY AI
You value true rag architecture with pinecone vector database and configurable retrieval parameters (relevance score, token distribution, focus mode)
Source attribution with every response - click-through to exact documents used for generation (transparency and trust differentiator)
Focus Mode unique capability: inject up to 1,000 specific documents into conversation context for targeted responses vs full knowledge base
Best For: TRUE RAG architecture with Pinecone vector database and configurable retrieval parameters (relevance score, token distribution, Focus Mode)
When to Choose Tidio
You value exceptional ease of use: 4.7/5 g2 rating with 253 'ease of use' and 161 'easy setup' mentions
Claude 3-powered Lyro AI achieving 79-87% success rates with customer case studies reporting 89-90% automation
300,000+ businesses served including Pizza Hut, Decathlon, Casio demonstrating SMB/e-commerce market fit
Best For: Exceptional ease of use: 4.7/5 G2 rating with 253 'Ease of Use' and 161 'Easy Setup' mentions
Migration & Switching Considerations
Switching between CODY AI and Tidio requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.
Pricing Comparison Summary
CODY AI starts at $29/month, while Tidio begins at $29/month. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.
Our Recommendation Process
Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality
For most organizations, the decision between CODY AI and Tidio comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.
📚 Next Steps
Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.
• Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
• Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
• Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
• Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements
Last updated: December 11, 2025 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.
The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.
DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.
People Also Compare
Explore more AI tool comparisons to find the perfect solution for your needs
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...