In this comprehensive guide, we compare Crisp and Supavec across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.
Overview
When choosing between Crisp and Supavec, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose Crisp if: you value omnichannel messaging with native whatsapp, messenger, instagram, telegram, twitter/x, sms, line, slack integrations
Choose Supavec if: you value 100% open source with no vendor lock-in
About Crisp
Crisp is omnichannel customer messaging platform with ai assistance. Customer messaging platform with AI features serving 600,000+ businesses. Founded 2015 (France) by Baptiste Jamin and Valerian Saliou, bootstrapped with $1.4M revenue (2024). NOT a RAG-as-a-Service platform—designed for unified customer communication with AI assistance. Proprietary Mirage AI model + third-party LLM support (GPT-4o, Claude, Llama). Critical gaps: NO programmatic knowledge querying API, NO vector/embedding infrastructure, NO bot management API, NO cloud storage integrations, NO SOC 2 certification (claims compliance without audit). €0-€295/month ($0-$316) with 50 AI uses/month on Essentials, unlimited on Plus. Founded in 2015, headquartered in Paris, France, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
87/100
Starting Price
$45/mo
About Supavec
Supavec is the open source rag as a service platform. SupaVec is an open-source RAG platform that serves as an alternative to Carbon.ai. Built on transparency and data sovereignty, it allows developers to build powerful RAG applications with complete control over their infrastructure, supporting any data source at any scale. Founded in 2024, headquartered in Remote, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
84/100
Starting Price
Custom
Key Differences at a Glance
In terms of user ratings, both platforms score similarly in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, Supavec offers more competitive entry pricing. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: Customer Support versus RAG Platform. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.
⚠️ What This Comparison Covers
We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.
Detailed Feature Comparison
Crisp
Supavec
CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
Five primary data source types: Answer snippets (Q&A pairs up to 1,000 characters), automatic website crawling by domain, native Knowledge Base articles, past conversation history from human agents, file uploads via Data Importer
Supported file formats: PDF, Word (DOC/DOCX), plain text (TXT), CSV through Data Importer feature
Website crawling: Entire domain processing with sitemap support, manual refresh requests required for updates (NO automatic sync for web content)
Knowledge Base sync: Articles automatically sync to AI training when updated (only source type with automatic retraining)
Conversation history training: Past human agent conversations used for AI learning with explicit training triggers required
Training permissions: Only workspace owners can launch AI training sessions (team bottleneck for larger organizations)
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO YouTube transcript support - cannot ingest video content for knowledge base
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO native cloud storage integrations - Google Drive, Dropbox, Notion, OneDrive all absent without third-party workarounds
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO documented volume limits or scaling capabilities - significant gap vs enterprise RAG platforms handling millions of documents
LIMITATION: No NO API endpoint to trigger retraining programmatically, No NO webhook notification when training completes, No NO scheduled retraining automation
No one-click Google Drive or Notion connectors—you’ll script the fetch and hit the API yourself.
Because it’s open source, you can build connectors to anything—Postgres, Mongo, S3, you name it.
Runs on Supabase and scales sideways, chunking millions of docs for fast retrieval.
Lets you ingest more than 1,400 file formats—PDF, DOCX, TXT, Markdown, HTML, and many more—via simple drag-and-drop or API.
Crawls entire sites through sitemaps and URLs, automatically indexing public help-desk articles, FAQs, and docs.
Turns multimedia into text on the fly: YouTube videos, podcasts, and other media are auto-transcribed with built-in OCR and speech-to-text.
View Transcription Guide
Connects to Google Drive, SharePoint, Notion, Confluence, HubSpot, and more through API connectors or Zapier.
See Zapier Connectors
Supports both manual uploads and auto-sync retraining, so your knowledge base always stays up to date.
Integrations & Channels
Omnichannel messaging: Website chat, email, WhatsApp Business API (Official Business Solution Provider), Facebook Messenger, Instagram DM, Telegram, Twitter/X DM, SMS (via Twilio), Line, Slack
Zapier integration: Triggers (new contacts, messages, conversations, segment updates, status changes), Actions (state changes, contact creation, conversation search) - functional but basic depth vs dedicated automation platforms
Website embedding: JavaScript snippet for native chat widget, NPM packages for React/Vue/Angular (crisp-sdk-web), mobile SDKs (iOS Swift, Android Java), React Native support
REST API: Comprehensive conversation management, CRM operations, helpdesk CRUD with programmatic access on all paid plans
Webhooks: Website Hooks (simple setup, limited events) + Plugin Hooks (50+ event namespaces, signed payloads, retry on failure)
RTM API: WebSocket connectivity via Socket.IO for real-time event streaming
Third-party LLMs: ChatGPT/GPT-4o, Claude AI, Llama, Dialogflow integration through chatbot builder
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO Microsoft Teams native integration documented (Slack available, Teams absent)
LIMITATION: Note: Limited iframe embedding - restricted to plugin UI contexts rather than general-purpose chatbox deployment
Pure REST for retrieval and generation—no built-in widget or Slack bot.
You code the chat UI or Slack bridge, calling Supavec for answers.
No Zapier—webhooks and automations are DIY inside your app.
If it speaks HTTP, it can talk to Supavec—you just handle the front-end.
Embeds easily—a lightweight script or iframe drops the chat widget into any website or mobile app.
Offers ready-made hooks for Slack, Zendesk, Confluence, YouTube, Sharepoint, 100+ more.
Explore API Integrations
Connects with 5,000+ apps via Zapier and webhooks to automate your workflows.
Supports secure deployments with domain allowlisting and a ChatGPT Plugin for private use cases.
Hosted CustomGPT.ai offers hosted MCP Server with support for Claude Web, Claude Desktop, Cursor, ChatGPT, Windsurf, Trae, etc.
Read more here.
WhatsApp Official Business Solution Provider: Official partnership status demonstrates platform validation and enterprise-grade integration quality
Unified inbox advantage: All channels (website, email, WhatsApp, Messenger, Instagram, Telegram, Twitter/X, SMS, Line, Slack) managed in single dashboard
Channel-agnostic chatbot deployment: Single bot builder deploys across web, mobile, social media, messaging apps without reconfiguration
SMS via Twilio: Text message support for broader reach beyond digital-native channels
Social media coverage: Facebook Messenger, Instagram DM, Twitter/X DM, Telegram for comprehensive social presence
Competitive positioning: 600,000+ businesses use omnichannel capabilities vs competitors' narrower messaging focus (9/10 rated differentiator for customer communication)
Use case fit: Businesses needing unified customer communication across multiple touchpoints with consistent AI assistance
N/A
N/A
Magic Reply A I Features ( Core Differentiator)
AI-suggested responses: One-click suggested responses agents can send based on conversation context and training data
Conversation summarization: Automatic summaries for shift handoffs enabling context continuity between agent teams
MagicTranscribe: Speech-to-text transcription for voice message processing and accessibility
Live translation: Real-time multilingual support with automatic language detection from browser settings, phone prefixes, account preferences
Topic categorization: Automatic conversation categorization before opening for routing efficiency and analytics
Configurable confidence thresholds: Adjustable across all 4 AI search actions (MagicReply, Search Helpdesk, Search Webpages, Search Answer) to reduce hallucinations
Uncertainty admission: AI explicitly states when it cannot find relevant information rather than fabricating responses (hallucination prevention)
Competitive advantage: Agent productivity features vs autonomous chatbot platforms - designed for human-AI collaboration rather than full automation (8/10 rated differentiator)
N/A
N/A
Core Chatbot Features
Chatbot builder 4 AI actions: MagicReply (generated responses from training data), Search Helpdesk (AI) (knowledge base articles), Search Webpages (AI) (crawled content), Search Answer (AI) (Q&A snippets)
Confidence threshold system: Each AI action supports configurable thresholds to balance accuracy vs. coverage and reduce hallucinations
Multi-lingual support: Automatic language detection from browser settings, phone number prefixes, account preferences with chatbot block translation across locales
Conversational Workflow Builder: Tailor-made workflow builder empowering companies to customize chatbot behavior and responses to align with unique customer service strategy
Event-Driven Conversation Flow: Each scenario starts with Event (starts flow), Actions (send message, update user info), Conditions (if-then checks for personalization), Exits (forward/end conversation)
Chatbot personality: Custom prompts define tone and behavior, bot name customization, composition animations for human-like feel, brand voice alignment - personalities should never change, moods remain even and predictable
System Prompt Control: Advanced options allow shaping personality via instructions like "You are a very patient instructor" to guide MagicReply behavior
Human handoff capabilities: Seamless bot-to-agent transitions, 2-minute "Awaiting Operator" timeout detection, operator assignment/mentions within flows, routing rules, full conversation context
Co-browsing (MagicBrowse): Live assistance capability for complex support scenarios enabling screen sharing and guided troubleshooting
LIMITATION: No NO programmatic personality management - tone/behavior settings dashboard-only, cannot modify per-user or via API (global configuration only)
Just the essentials: retrieve chunks + LLM answer. Calls are stateless, no baked-in chat history.
No lead capture or human handoff—add those in your own layer.
Pulls the right text fast, then lets your LLM craft the reply.
Perfect if you only need raw RAG and will build the conversation bits yourself.
Reduces hallucinations by grounding replies in your data and adding source citations for transparency.
Benchmark Details
Handles multi-turn, context-aware chats with persistent history and solid conversation management.
Speaks 90+ languages, making global rollouts straightforward.
Includes extras like lead capture (email collection) and smooth handoff to a human when needed.
Pattern matching wildcards: Flexible message detection with wildcard support for conversational variety
November 2024 update: Bot builder improvements including merging action blocks and enhanced multilingual testing capabilities
Template functionality: Import/export flows for sharing and backup, example scenarios available but NO industry-specific templates (e-commerce, SaaS support, lead qualification) out of box
Non-technical user accessibility: SME teams can upload Q&A snippets, manage articles via WYSIWYG editor, trigger web crawls, build flows without coding (genuinely serves teams without developer dependencies)
LIMITATION: Note: Pre-built templates limited - users must build flows manually vs competitors with extensive template libraries (7/10 rated - functional but requires customization effort)
N/A
N/A
Widget Customization & White- Labeling
UI customization: Colors, branding, positioning, custom triggers per page, proactive messages with personalization tokens
A/B testing: Placement and copy testing for optimization of engagement and conversion rates
White-labeling (Plus €295/month): Remove "We run on Crisp" watermark, custom email domains, custom Knowledge Base domains
LIMITATION: Note: Advanced CSS customization capabilities unclear in documentation - platform favors preset options over deep styling control (vs competitors with full CSS access)
LIMITATION: Domain restrictions for widget deployment not explicitly documented - likely exist but transparency gap for security configuration
N/A
N/A
L L M Model Options
Proprietary Mirage AI model: Retrained November 2024 with 10x more data as foundation, leverages leading open-source LLMs
Third-party integrations: ChatGPT/GPT-4o, Claude AI, Llama, Dialogflow through chatbot builder
Mirage reranking model: Proprietary optimization mentioned but technical details undisclosed
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No Model selection and routing happen exclusively in dashboard - NO API endpoint to switch between models programmatically
LIMITATION: No NO automatic model routing based on query complexity or cost vs. performance optimization (vs intelligent routing in RAG platforms)
LIMITATION: No NO exposed configuration for developers - cannot programmatically adjust AI behavior, model selection, or fine-tune responses via API
LIMITATION: No NO documented proprietary optimizations beyond confidence threshold settings and "10x more training data" claim for Mirage (transparency gap)
Model-agnostic: defaults to GPT-3.5, but switch to GPT-4 or any self-hosted model if you’d like.
No fancy toggle—just change a config or prompt path in code.
No extra prompt magic or anti-hallucination layer—plain RAG.
Quality rests on the LLM you choose and how you prompt it.
Taps into top models—OpenAI’s GPT-5.1 series, GPT-4 series, and even Anthropic’s Claude for enterprise needs (4.5 opus and sonnet, etc ).
Automatically balances cost and performance by picking the right model for each request.
Model Selection Details
Uses proprietary prompt engineering and retrieval tweaks to return high-quality, citation-backed answers.
Handles all model management behind the scenes—no extra API keys or fine-tuning steps for you.
Developer Experience ( A P I & S D Ks)
REST API capabilities: Comprehensive conversation management (create/get/delete/send messages with 8+ message types including text, files, audio, carousels), People/CRM CRUD with bulk CSV import and custom data fields, Helpdesk API with full CRUD for localized articles and multi-locale support (ISO 639-1 codes)
Official SDKs (5 languages): Node.js (crisp-api on npm - actively maintained, designated "baseline"), Go (go-crisp-api - actively maintained), PHP/Python/Ruby (lag behind with 2023 API revisions)
Mobile SDKs: iOS (Swift), Android (Java), React Native for native app integration
Authentication: Basic Auth with token identifier/key pairs, user tokens and plugin tokens with granular scopes
Rate limiting: Multi-level (per-IP and per-user identifier), HTTP 429 or 420 on limit hits, plugin tokens exempt from per-minute limits but use daily quotas, specific limits undisclosed by design
Webhook support: Website Hooks (simple setup, limited events) + Plugin Hooks (50+ event namespaces, signed payloads, retry on failure)
RTM API: WebSocket connectivity via Socket.IO for real-time event streaming
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO API to create or manage bots programmatically - chatbots configured exclusively via dashboard's no-code builder (API documentation explicitly states this)
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO vector store endpoints, NO embedding generation API, NO semantic search API, NO context retrieval endpoint, NO prompt template management API
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO AI usage metrics exposure via API - all analytics dashboard-only without programmatic access
LIMITATION: No Cannot trigger AI responses or query knowledge base via API - workflows can send messages with automated: true flag but cannot invoke AI processing programmatically
LIMITATION: Enterprise scaling documentation minimal - no SLA guarantees in public docs, no specified throughput limits, user reports mention rate limiting under heavy API usage
Straightforward REST endpoints for file uploads, text uploads, and search.
[Examples]
No official SDKs—use fetch/axios or roll your own wrapper.
Docs are concise with JS snippets; Postman collection included.
Full source is on GitHub, welcoming community tweaks.
Ships a well-documented REST API for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data, and querying chat.
API Documentation
Backs you up with cookbooks, code samples, and step-by-step guides for every skill level.
R E S T A P I Comprehensiveness ( Differentiator)
Conversation management depth: Full CRUD operations with message type variety (text, files, audio, carousels, picker, field, carousel, note, event), compose/typing indicators, state transition management, list/pagination support
People/CRM capabilities: Full CRUD operations, bulk CSV import, custom data fields, segment filtering for targeted communication
Helpdesk API strength: Full CRUD for localized articles, category and section taxonomy management, multi-locale support using ISO 639-1 codes, external helpdesk import via URL crawling
Official SDK ecosystem: Node.js (baseline), Go (actively maintained), PHP/Python/Ruby (2023 revisions), iOS/Android/React Native mobile SDKs
Competitive positioning: API depth for messaging/CRM operations vs RAG platforms (8/10 rated for customer messaging API, 2/10 for RAG API - fundamentally different focus)
CRITICAL ARCHITECTURAL GAP: No NOT a RAG-as-a-Service platform - lacks vector databases, embedding controls, and configurable retrieval pipelines
AI Hub training sources: Knowledge base articles, crawled web content, conversation history, Q&A snippets processed through opaque system
Confidence scoring: Adjustable thresholds across 4 AI search actions with fallback branches when AI cannot find relevant information
Hallucination prevention: Relies on confidence threshold system and AI's trained behavior to admit uncertainty (no citation attribution or source verification)
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO RAG-specific technical details documented - chunking strategies, embedding model specifications, vector database architecture, retrieval algorithm details undisclosed
LIMITATION: No NO reranking methodology documentation beyond mention of "Mirage reranking model" (transparency gap vs RAG platforms)
LIMITATION: No NO benchmark results for accuracy in public documentation - no quantitative validation of RAG performance claims
LIMITATION: No NO mechanism for developers to inject context, provide examples, or fine-tune retrieval behavior programmatically
Competitive positioning: Customer messaging platform with practical AI assistance vs purpose-built RAG infrastructure (rated 2/10 as RAG platform - fundamentally different architecture)
N/A
N/A
Security & Privacy
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No SOC 2 certification notably absent - Crisp claims compliance with SOC 2 principles but has NOT completed formal audit (enterprise procurement blocker)
GDPR Compliant: Full compliance as French company (Crisp IM SAS) with Data Processing Agreements available and EU data storage
EU data residency: Messaging data stored in Netherlands, plugin data stored in Germany for European privacy requirements
Encryption: All public network channels encrypted, real-time chat encrypted in transit
Infrastructure security: Hardware token generators, aggressive firewalls, network isolation, VPN-only administrator access, bug bounty program for security researchers
Two-factor authentication: Available for user accounts with identity verification support
Workspace-level data isolation: Customer separation but not tenant-isolated in enterprise sense
Privacy features: Deferred session initialization until user interaction for minimal data collection
Uptime SLA: Historically exceeds 99.99% (>99.9945% reported for 2019) with public status page for transparency
LIMITATION: No NO HIPAA certification, No NO ISO 27001 certification - limits adoption in regulated industries (healthcare, financial services)
Self-hosting keeps everything on your servers—great for tight compliance.
[Privacy note]
Hosted Supavec runs on Supabase with row-level security—each team’s data is fenced off.
No training on your docs—data stays yours.
Enterprises can go dedicated or on-prem for HIPAA/GDPR peace of mind.
Protects data in transit with SSL/TLS and at rest with 256-bit AES encryption.
Holds SOC 2 Type II certification and complies with GDPR, so your data stays isolated and private.
Security Certifications
Offers fine-grained access controls—RBAC, two-factor auth, and SSO integration—so only the right people get in.
Observability & Monitoring
Analytics dashboard: Response time metrics, customer satisfaction scores, bot handoff rates, day-by-day support performance tracking
Advanced analytics (Plus plan): Enhanced metrics and reporting capabilities for deeper performance insights
Conversation logs: AI-user exchange review with ability to refine responses and identify knowledge gaps
Real-time monitoring: Conversation flow visibility for operators with queue status tracking
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No NO analytics API - all metrics dashboard-only, cannot programmatically pull performance data or export usage statistics
LIMITATION: No People Statistics endpoint provides only basic counts - no comprehensive analytics API for integration with external observability systems
LIMITATION: No Proactive alerting capabilities not documented - unclear support for monitoring platform integrations (DataDog, PagerDuty, etc.)
LIMITATION: No NO integration with external monitoring platforms appears in integration list (self-contained analytics only)
No dashboard baked in—log requests yourself or use Supabase metrics when self-hosting.
Hosted plan shows basic call counts; no transcript analytics out of the box.
Need deep insights? Wire up your own monitoring layer.
Designed to play nicely with external logging tools, not ship its own.
Comes with a real-time analytics dashboard tracking query volumes, token usage, and indexing status.
Lets you export logs and metrics via API to plug into third-party monitoring or BI tools.
Analytics API
Provides detailed insights for troubleshooting and ongoing optimization.
E U Data Residency & G D P R Compliance ( Differentiator)
French company advantage: Crisp IM SAS headquartered in France ensures native GDPR understanding and compliance culture
Geographic data isolation: Messaging data in Netherlands, plugin data in Germany within EU boundaries
Data Processing Agreements: Available for enterprise customers requiring formal privacy commitments
GDPR subject rights: Full support for access, rectification, erasure, portability requests built into platform
Privacy by design: Deferred session initialization until user interaction minimizes unnecessary data collection
Competitive positioning: EU businesses requiring data sovereignty and GDPR compliance favor EU-based vendors over US alternatives (8.5/10 rated differentiator for European market)
600,000+ business validation: Large customer base demonstrates trust in privacy and security practices
N/A
N/A
Pricing & Scalability
Free plan: €0/month ($0) - 2 seats, basic chat only, NO AI chatbot functionality
Mini plan: €45/month (~$48) - 4 seats, NO AI chatbot (messaging-only tier)
Essentials plan: €95/month (~$102) - 10 seats, AI chatbot with 50 uses/month limit (major constraint for automation)
Plus plan: €295/month (~$316) - 20+ seats, unlimited AI resolutions, white-labeling, advanced analytics, custom domains
Alternative pricing model: $95/month base + $45/month AI add-on + $0.10 per AI action (escalates costs at high volume)
Extra seats (Plus): €10/agent/month for additional team members
14-day free trials: All paid plans include trial period for evaluation
Per-workspace model: No per-conversation fees on base usage benefits predictable budgeting (vs per-message pricing competitors)
CONCERN: Note: AI usage caps on Essentials (50 uses/month at €95) create barriers for teams needing significant automation - unlimited requires €295 Plus tier
MIT-licensed open source: self-host for free (pay your own infra).
Need more calls? Negotiate or self-host to ditch caps.
Storage isn’t metered—only query volume counts toward the plan.
Runs on straightforward subscriptions: Standard (~$99/mo), Premium (~$449/mo), and customizable Enterprise plans.
Gives generous limits—Standard covers up to 60 million words per bot, Premium up to 300 million—all at flat monthly rates.
View Pricing
Handles scaling for you: the managed cloud infra auto-scales with demand, keeping things fast and available.
Support & Ecosystem
Developer Hub: Comprehensive documentation at docs.crisp.chat with REST API references, RTM API guides, webhook setup, SDK installation guides, Postman collections
Chappe documentation builder: 228 GitHub stars - powers docs site demonstrating technical investment in documentation infrastructure
Chat-based support: Generally praised for responsiveness with direct chat access to support team
Enhanced support (Plus): Higher tier plans receive prioritized assistance and faster response times
Bootstrapped team: 14-20 employees handle global customer base of 600,000+ businesses
Code examples: Available in official SDKs but real-world cookbook content sparse vs comprehensive tutorial libraries
LIMITATION: No NO public forum for developer knowledge sharing and community troubleshooting
LIMITATION: No Minimal GitHub community engagement - most repositories show single-digit external contributors indicating limited open-source collaboration
LIMITATION: No NO dedicated account management details specified for Enterprise customers (unclear what personalized support includes)
LIMITATION: Developer community engagement happens primarily through marketplace plugin development rather than open collaboration on core platform
Community help via GitHub/Discord; paid plans unlock email or priority support.
[Docs]
Open-source means forks, PRs, and home-grown connectors are welcome.
Docs are lean—mostly endpoint references rather than big tutorials.
Code samples pop up in the community, but it’s not a huge library yet.
Supplies rich docs, tutorials, cookbooks, and FAQs to get you started fast.
Developer Docs
Offers quick email and in-app chat support—Premium and Enterprise plans add dedicated managers and faster SLAs.
Enterprise Solutions
Benefits from an active user community plus integrations through Zapier and GitHub resources.
R A G-as-a- Service Assessment
Platform classification: CUSTOMER MESSAGING PLATFORM with AI features layered on top, NOT a dedicated RAG-as-a-Service solution
Architecture philosophy: Designed for unified customer communication with AI assistance, not custom AI application building
Target audience: SMBs wanting affordable customer messaging with AI-powered agent productivity vs developers requiring RAG infrastructure control
Missing RAG foundations: NO vector store endpoints, NO embedding APIs, NO semantic search endpoints, NO programmatic knowledge querying, NO bot management API
Use case fit: Excellent for businesses wanting to USE AI-powered customer support; does NOT serve developers wanting to BUILD custom RAG applications
Competitive positioning: Mature customer messaging platform (600,000+ businesses) competing with Intercom/Zendesk vs RAG platforms like Vectara/Pinecone Assistant (rated 2/10 as RAG platform - fundamentally different category)
Strengths alignment: Omnichannel messaging, EU data residency, affordable SMB pricing, visual no-code builders, MagicReply agent productivity
Critical gaps for RAG: NO programmatic knowledge querying, NO vector/embedding infrastructure, NO bot management API, NO cloud storage ingestion, NO model selection API, NO analytics API
Platform Type: TRUE RAG-AS-A-SERVICE API - Lightweight MIT-licensed open-source RAG backend built on Supabase with self-hosting capability and minimal API surface
Core Mission: Provide transparent, open-source alternative to proprietary RAG services (Carbon.ai shutdown response) with full cost control and no vendor lock-in
Target Market: Developers building custom RAG applications on budget, startups minimizing costs with self-hosting, organizations requiring data sovereignty with Supabase infrastructure
RAG Implementation: Standard RAG architecture with document chunking, OpenAI embeddings, Postgres pgvector semantic search—focused on simplicity over advanced techniques
API-First Design: Pure REST API for retrieval and generation without GUI, widgets, or conversational features—intentionally minimal abstraction for developer control
Self-Hosting Advantage: MIT license enables complete on-premises deployment keeping all data on your servers—ideal for GDPR, HIPAA, data residency compliance
Managed Service Option: Cloud-hosted plans (Free: 100 calls/month, Basic: $190/year for 750 calls/month, Enterprise: $1,490/year for 5K calls/month) eliminate infrastructure management
Pricing Model: Free self-hosting (MIT license) or extremely affordable hosted plans—40-90% cheaper than commercial RAG platforms with no per-document charges or user seat fees
Data Sources: File uploads (PDF, Markdown, TXT) via REST API or raw text ingestion—NO pre-built Google Drive, Notion, or cloud storage connectors (manual scripting required)
Model Flexibility: Model-agnostic with GPT-3.5 default, GPT-4, or self-hosted LLM support—users connect own OpenAI API keys without Supavec markup on AI costs
Security Foundation: Supabase Row-Level Security (RLS) for multi-tenant data isolation, HTTPS encryption, AES-256 at-rest encryption—self-hosting enables GDPR/HIPAA compliance
Support Model: Community GitHub/Discord support for free tier, email support for paid plans—no dedicated CSMs, SLAs, or enterprise account management
Open-Source Ecosystem: Transparent code on GitHub welcoming PRs, forks, and community contributions—no proprietary components or vendor lock-in
LIMITATION - Developer-Only Platform: Requires coding skills for setup, integration, and maintenance—non-technical teams cannot use without developer support
LIMITATION - Basic RAG Features: Standard retrieval without hybrid search, reranking, knowledge graphs, multi-query fusion, or hallucination detection—advanced features require custom development
LIMITATION - No Turnkey Features: No GUI dashboard, conversation management, lead capture, analytics, or multi-channel integrations—pure RAG API requiring application layer development
Comparison Validity: Architectural comparison to full-featured chatbot platforms like CustomGPT.ai requires context—Supavec is lightweight RAG backend API vs complete no-code chatbot builder
Use Case Fit: Perfect for developers wanting lightweight RAG backend without heavy frameworks, startups minimizing costs with Supabase self-hosting, teams building custom chatbots needing simple REST API for retrieval without paying for unused dashboard features
Core Architecture: Serverless RAG infrastructure with automatic embedding generation, vector search optimization, and LLM orchestration fully managed behind API endpoints
API-First Design: Comprehensive REST API with well-documented endpoints for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data (1,400+ formats), and querying chat
API Documentation
Developer Experience: Open-source Python SDK (customgpt-client), Postman collections, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, and extensive cookbooks for rapid integration
No-Code Alternative: Wizard-style web dashboard enables non-developers to upload content, brand widgets, and deploy chatbots without touching code
Hybrid Target Market: Serves both developer teams wanting robust APIs AND business users seeking no-code RAG deployment - unique positioning vs pure API platforms (Cohere) or pure no-code tools (Jotform)
RAG Technology Leadership: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, proprietary anti-hallucination mechanisms, and citation-backed responses
Benchmark Details
Deployment Flexibility: Cloud-hosted SaaS with auto-scaling, API integrations, embedded chat widgets, ChatGPT Plugin support, and hosted MCP Server for Claude/Cursor/ChatGPT
Enterprise Readiness: SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling, domain allowlisting, RBAC with 2FA/SSO, and flat-rate pricing without per-query charges
Use Case Fit: Ideal for organizations needing both rapid no-code deployment AND robust API capabilities, teams handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), and businesses requiring production-ready RAG without building ML infrastructure from scratch
Competitive Positioning: Bridges the gap between developer-first platforms (Cohere, Deepset) requiring heavy coding and no-code chatbot builders (Jotform, Kommunicate) lacking API depth - offers best of both worlds
Competitive Positioning
vs CustomGPT: Crisp excels in omnichannel customer messaging with AI assistance; CustomGPT excels in RAG-as-a-Service infrastructure with programmatic control
vs Intercom/Zendesk: Crisp competes directly in customer messaging space with comparable features, lower pricing (€295 vs $500+/month), EU data residency advantage
vs LiveChat/Drift: Similar customer communication focus with Crisp differentiating on proprietary Mirage AI model and WhatsApp Official Business Solution Provider status
vs RAG platforms (Vectara, Pinecone Assistant, Ragie): Fundamentally different category - Crisp not designed for RAG development, lacks vector databases and programmatic knowledge retrieval entirely
Market niche: Mature customer messaging platform for SMBs wanting affordable omnichannel communication with AI assistance, NOT a RAG alternative for knowledge retrieval applications
Market position: MIT-licensed open-source RAG API built on Supabase, offering lightweight alternative to Carbon.ai with self-hosting capability and minimal API surface
Target customers: Developers building custom RAG applications on budget, startups wanting to avoid RAG platform costs, and organizations requiring self-hosted solutions with Supabase infrastructure for data sovereignty
Key competitors: Carbon.ai, LangChain, SimplyRetrieve, and hosted RAG APIs like CustomGPT/Pinecone Assistant
Competitive advantages: MIT open-source license with no vendor lock-in, Supabase foundation for familiar infrastructure, model-agnostic with easy LLM swapping (GPT-3.5, GPT-4, self-hosted), REST API simplicity with straightforward endpoints, privacy-focused with self-hosting option keeping data on your servers, and minimal abstraction enabling deep customization
Pricing advantage: Free (MIT license) for self-hosting; hosted plans extremely affordable ($190/year Basic for 750 calls/month, $1,490/year Enterprise for 5K calls/month); best value for low-volume applications or teams with Supabase expertise wanting to avoid expensive RAG platforms; 40-90% cheaper than commercial alternatives
Use case fit: Perfect for developers wanting lightweight RAG backend without heavy frameworks, startups minimizing costs with self-hosting on existing Supabase infrastructure, and teams building custom chatbot front-ends needing simple REST API for retrieval without paying for unused dashboard features
Market position: Leading all-in-one RAG platform balancing enterprise-grade accuracy with developer-friendly APIs and no-code usability for rapid deployment
Target customers: Mid-market to enterprise organizations needing production-ready AI assistants, development teams wanting robust APIs without building RAG infrastructure, and businesses requiring 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription (YouTube, podcasts)
Key competitors: OpenAI Assistants API, Botsonic, Chatbase.co, Azure AI, and custom RAG implementations using LangChain
Competitive advantages: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling included, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, hosted MCP Server support (Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT), generous data limits (60M words Standard, 300M Premium), and flat monthly pricing without per-query charges
Pricing advantage: Transparent flat-rate pricing at $99/month (Standard) and $449/month (Premium) with generous included limits; no hidden costs for API access, branding removal, or basic features; best value for teams needing both no-code dashboard and developer APIs in one platform
Use case fit: Ideal for businesses needing both rapid no-code deployment and robust API capabilities, organizations handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), teams requiring white-label chatbots with source citations for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects, and companies wanting all-in-one RAG without managing ML infrastructure
Customer Base & Case Studies
Scale: 600,000+ businesses served globally demonstrating mature product-market fit for customer messaging segment
Bootstrapped success: $1.4M revenue in 2024 as bootstrapped company (no external funding) validates sustainable business model
Geographic distribution: Global customer base with strong European presence due to EU data residency and GDPR compliance
Target market: SMBs seeking affordable Intercom alternatives with unified customer communication across channels
Use case validation: Customer support teams, e-commerce businesses, SaaS companies using omnichannel messaging with AI assistance
WhatsApp validation: Official Business Solution Provider status demonstrates platform quality and enterprise-grade integration capabilities
Uptime track record: >99.9945% reported uptime in 2019 demonstrates operational reliability at scale
N/A
N/A
Company Background
Founding: 2015 by Baptiste Jamin and Valerian Saliou in France (10 years of platform development)
Legal entity: Crisp IM SAS, French company headquartered in France
Funding status: Bootstrapped with $1.4M revenue in 2024 (no external venture capital)
Team size: 14-20 employees handling global customer base of 600,000+ businesses
Customer base: 600,000+ businesses globally with strong SMB focus and European presence
Product evolution: Proprietary Mirage AI model retrained November 2024 with 10x more data demonstrates ongoing platform investment
Market positioning: Affordable Intercom alternative for SMBs with EU data residency and comprehensive omnichannel messaging
Geographic focus: Global SaaS distribution with EU data storage (Netherlands, Germany) for GDPR compliance
N/A
N/A
A I Models
Proprietary Mirage AI: Custom-built model retrained November 2024 with 10x more training data, leverages leading open-source LLMs as foundation
Third-party integrations: ChatGPT/GPT-4o, Claude AI, Llama, Dialogflow accessible through chatbot builder
LIMITATION: Model selection dashboard-only - no API endpoint for programmatic switching between models
LIMITATION: No automatic model routing based on query complexity or cost optimization
LIMITATION: No exposed configuration for developers to adjust AI behavior or fine-tune responses via API
Model-agnostic architecture: Defaults to GPT-3.5 Turbo for cost-effectiveness, with full support for GPT-4, GPT-4-turbo, and any OpenAI-compatible models
Self-hosted model support: Bring your own LLM - compatible with self-hosted models like Llama, Mistral, or custom fine-tuned models via API endpoints
No model lock-in: Switch between models by changing configuration or prompt path in code without platform restrictions
No markup on AI costs: Users connect their own OpenAI API keys or self-hosted endpoints, paying providers directly without Supavec markup
Note: No built-in model routing: No automatic model selection or load balancing - developers must implement routing logic manually
Note: No prompt optimization layer: Plain RAG implementation without advanced prompt engineering or anti-hallucination guardrails
Quality dependency: Output quality rests entirely on chosen LLM and developer's prompt engineering skills
Primary models: GPT-5.1 and 4 series from OpenAI, and Anthropic's Claude 4.5 (opus and sonnet) for enterprise needs
Automatic model selection: Balances cost and performance by automatically selecting the appropriate model for each request
Model Selection Details
Proprietary optimizations: Custom prompt engineering and retrieval enhancements for high-quality, citation-backed answers
Managed infrastructure: All model management handled behind the scenes - no API keys or fine-tuning required from users
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms ensure chatbot only answers based on provided content, improving trust and factual accuracy
R A G Capabilities
AI Hub training sources: Knowledge base articles, crawled website content, conversation history, Q&A snippets processed through proprietary system
Confidence scoring system: Adjustable thresholds across 4 AI search actions (MagicReply, Search Helpdesk, Search Webpages, Search Answer) to reduce hallucinations
Hallucination prevention: AI explicitly states when it cannot find relevant information rather than fabricating responses
CRITICAL LIMITATION: NOT a RAG-as-a-Service platform - lacks vector databases, embedding controls, and configurable retrieval pipelines
CRITICAL LIMITATION: No RAG technical details documented - chunking strategies, embedding model specifications, vector database architecture undisclosed
LIMITATION: No reranking methodology documentation beyond mention of "Mirage reranking model"
LIMITATION: No benchmark results for accuracy published - no quantitative validation of RAG performance claims
LIMITATION: No mechanism for developers to inject context, provide examples, or fine-tune retrieval behavior programmatically
Standard RAG architecture: Document chunking with vector embeddings stored in Postgres pgvector extension for semantic search
Embedding generation: Automatic embedding creation during document upload using OpenAI embedding models or custom embedding endpoints
Vector search: Postgres vector search with cosine similarity for retrieval, handling millions of chunks efficiently
Re-indexing speed: Almost instant document re-embedding when updating or overwriting knowledge sources
Metadata support: Custom metadata tagging and filtering capabilities for organized knowledge management
Note: No advanced RAG features: No hybrid search (semantic + keyword), no reranking, no multi-query retrieval, no query expansion
Note: No hallucination detection: No built-in citation validation, factual consistency scoring, or confidence thresholds - developers must implement manually
Note: No retrieval parameter controls: Chunking strategy, similarity thresholds, and top-k configuration require code-level changes
Core architecture: GPT-4 combined with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology, outperforming OpenAI in RAG benchmarks
RAG Performance
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms reduce hallucinations and ensure responses are grounded in provided content
Benchmark Details
Automatic citations: Each response includes clickable citations pointing to original source documents for transparency and verification
Optimized pipeline: Efficient vector search, smart chunking, and caching for sub-second reply times
Scalability: Maintains speed and accuracy for massive knowledge bases with tens of millions of words
Context-aware conversations: Multi-turn conversations with persistent history and comprehensive conversation management
Source verification: Always cites sources so users can verify facts on the spot
Use Cases
Customer support automation: Unified inbox across website, email, WhatsApp, Messenger, Instagram, Telegram, Twitter/X, SMS for omnichannel support
Agent productivity: MagicReply AI-suggested responses, conversation summarization, automatic categorization, live translation for international teams
Lead capture and qualification: Proactive chat triggers, visitor tracking, CRM integration with custom data fields
E-commerce support: Product inquiries, order tracking, multi-language customer service across social media and messaging apps
SaaS onboarding: Help desk integration, contextual chat based on page visited, seamless bot-to-human handoff
SMB communication hub: 600,000+ businesses use Crisp as affordable Intercom alternative with EU data residency
NOT suitable for: Custom RAG application development, programmatic knowledge retrieval, developer-facing AI APIs
Custom chatbot backends: Ideal for developers building custom chat interfaces needing simple RAG API without heavy platform overhead
Self-hosted knowledge retrieval: Perfect for organizations requiring data sovereignty with Supabase infrastructure for compliance (GDPR, HIPAA when self-hosted)
Budget-conscious RAG applications: Startups and small teams minimizing costs with MIT open-source license and affordable hosted plans ($190-$1,490/year)
Supabase-native projects: Teams already using Supabase can integrate Supavec seamlessly without additional infrastructure complexity
Developer-first RAG: Code-first teams wanting full control over RAG implementation, eschewing GUI dashboards for API-driven workflows
Not ideal for: Non-technical users requiring no-code interfaces, enterprises needing advanced RAG features (hybrid search, reranking), or teams requiring built-in analytics/monitoring
Not ideal for: Production applications requiring hallucination detection, citation validation, or confidence scoring without custom development
Customer support automation: AI assistants handling common queries, reducing support ticket volume, providing 24/7 instant responses with source citations
Internal knowledge management: Employee self-service for HR policies, technical documentation, onboarding materials, company procedures across 1,400+ file formats
Sales enablement: Product information chatbots, lead qualification, customer education with white-labeled widgets on websites and apps
Documentation assistance: Technical docs, help centers, FAQs with automatic website crawling and sitemap indexing
Educational platforms: Course materials, research assistance, student support with multimedia content (YouTube transcriptions, podcasts)
Healthcare information: Patient education, medical knowledge bases (SOC 2 Type II compliant for sensitive data)
Two-factor authentication: Available for user accounts with identity verification support
Uptime SLA: Historically exceeds 99.99% (>99.9945% reported for 2019) with public status page
CRITICAL LIMITATION: SOC 2 certification absent - claims compliance with principles but has NOT completed formal audit (enterprise procurement blocker)
LIMITATION: No HIPAA certification, no ISO 27001 certification - limits adoption in regulated industries (healthcare, financial services)
LIMITATION: Workspace-level data isolation but not tenant-isolated in enterprise sense
Self-hosting advantage: MIT license enables complete data sovereignty - all data stays on your servers for strict compliance requirements
[Privacy note]
Supabase security foundation: Row-level security (RLS) fences off each team's data when using hosted Supavec on Supabase infrastructure
No model training: Your documents never used for LLM training - data remains yours with zero retention by OpenAI or other providers
GDPR/HIPAA ready: Self-hosting enables GDPR and HIPAA compliance when deployed on compliant infrastructure - enterprises can go dedicated or on-premises
Encryption: Standard HTTPS encryption for API calls; at-rest encryption depends on hosting infrastructure (Supabase provides AES-256)
Note: No SOC 2 certification: Open-source project lacks formal SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, or other enterprise compliance certifications for hosted plans
Note: No built-in access controls: Authentication, authorization, and RBAC must be implemented by developers in their application layer
Note: Limited hosted security features: Hosted plans lack SSO/SAML, IP whitelisting, or advanced security controls without custom configuration
Encryption: SSL/TLS for data in transit, 256-bit AES encryption for data at rest
SOC 2 Type II certification: Industry-leading security standards with regular third-party audits
Security Certifications
GDPR compliance: Full compliance with European data protection regulations, ensuring data privacy and user rights
Access controls: Role-based access control (RBAC), two-factor authentication (2FA), SSO integration for enterprise security
Data isolation: Customer data stays isolated and private - platform never trains on user data
Domain allowlisting: Ensures chatbot appears only on approved sites for security and brand protection
Secure deployments: ChatGPT Plugin support for private use cases with controlled access
Pricing & Plans
Free plan: €0/month ($0) - 2 seats, basic chat only, NO AI chatbot functionality
Mini plan: €45/month (~$48) - 4 seats, NO AI chatbot (messaging-only tier)
Essentials plan: €95/month (~$102) - 10 seats, AI chatbot with 50 uses/month limit (major constraint for automation)
Plus plan: €295/month (~$316) - 20+ seats, unlimited AI resolutions, white-labeling, advanced analytics, custom domains
Alternative pricing model: $95/month base + $45/month AI add-on + $0.10 per AI action (escalates costs at high volume)
Extra seats (Plus): €10/agent/month for additional team members
14-day free trials: All paid plans include trial period for evaluation
White-labeling cost: Included in Plus plan at €295/month - removes "We run on Crisp" watermark, custom email domains, custom Knowledge Base domains
CONCERN: AI usage caps on Essentials (50 uses/month at €95) create barriers for teams needing significant automation - unlimited requires €295 Plus tier
Open-source (Free): MIT-licensed for self-hosting - pay only your infrastructure costs (Supabase, server, storage) with unlimited API calls and no vendor fees
Hosted Free tier: 100 API calls per month for development and testing
[Pricing]
Basic Plan: $190/year ($15.83/month equivalent) - 750 API calls per month, hosted infrastructure, automatic backups, email support
Enterprise Plan: $1,490/year ($124.17/month equivalent) - 5,000 API calls per month, priority support, SLA guarantees, dedicated resources
No per-document charges: Storage not metered separately - only query volume counts toward plan limits
No user seat fees: Pricing based purely on API call volume, not team size or number of developers
Need more calls? Negotiate custom limits with hosted provider or self-host to eliminate caps entirely
Value proposition: 40-90% cheaper than commercial RAG platforms - Basic plan costs less than 1 month of competing platforms while providing annual service
Standard Plan: $99/month or $89/month annual - 10 custom chatbots, 5,000 items per chatbot, 60 million words per bot, basic helpdesk support, standard security
View Pricing
Premium Plan: $499/month or $449/month annual - 100 custom chatbots, 20,000 items per chatbot, 300 million words per bot, advanced support, enhanced security, additional customization
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing - Comprehensive AI solutions, highest security and compliance, dedicated account managers, custom SSO, token authentication, priority support with faster SLAs
Enterprise Solutions
7-Day Free Trial: Full access to Standard features without charges - available to all users
Annual billing discount: Save 10% by paying upfront annually ($89/mo Standard, $449/mo Premium)
Flat monthly rates: No per-query charges, no hidden costs for API access or white-labeling (included in all plans)
Managed infrastructure: Auto-scaling cloud infrastructure included - no additional hosting or scaling fees
Support & Documentation
Developer Hub: Comprehensive documentation at docs.crisp.chat with REST API references, RTM API guides, webhook setup, SDK installation guides, Postman collections
Chappe documentation builder: 228 GitHub stars - powers docs site demonstrating technical investment in documentation infrastructure
Chat-based support: Generally praised for responsiveness with direct chat access to support team
Enhanced support (Plus): Higher tier plans receive prioritized assistance and faster response times
Code examples: Available in official SDKs (Node.js, Go, PHP, Python, Ruby, iOS, Android, React Native) but real-world cookbook content sparse
LIMITATION: No public forum for developer knowledge sharing and community troubleshooting
LIMITATION: Minimal GitHub community engagement - most repositories show single-digit external contributors
LIMITATION: No dedicated account management details specified for Enterprise customers
Documentation: Lean API reference docs focusing on endpoint usage with JavaScript code snippets - mostly technical rather than tutorial-heavy
[Docs]
Community support: GitHub Discussions and Discord for free tier and self-hosted users - community-driven help and troubleshooting
Email support: Paid plan users (Basic/Enterprise) get email support with priority levels based on tier
No dedicated CSM: No Customer Success Manager or account management even on Enterprise tier - support ticket-based
GitHub repository: Open-source code welcomes PRs, issues, and community contributions - active maintainer responses
Postman collection: API documentation includes Postman collection for quick testing and integration
Code samples: Community-contributed examples and integrations appearing in GitHub issues and Discord, but not extensive official library
Learning curve: Requires developer skills - no video tutorials, webinars, or certification programs like commercial platforms
Documentation hub: Rich docs, tutorials, cookbooks, FAQs, API references for rapid onboarding
Developer Docs
Email and in-app support: Quick support via email and in-app chat for all users
Premium support: Premium and Enterprise plans include dedicated account managers and faster SLAs
Code samples: Cookbooks, step-by-step guides, and examples for every skill level
API Documentation
Real-Time Knowledge Updates: Always available manual retraining across all plans - but automatic syncing only for Knowledge Base articles (not website crawls or docs)
Automatic Syncing: Limited to Knowledge Base articles - website crawls require manual refresh requests (NO automatic sync for web content)
Bot Personality Customization: Customize chatbot's personality and responses to cater to different user segments or scenarios enhancing engagement
Consistent Personality Traits: Bot should always communicate and respond in same tone, dialect, and manner - personalities should never change, moods remain even and predictable
System Prompt Customization: Advanced options allow giving instructions to MagicReply to shape personality (e.g., "You are a very patient instructor")
Custom Workflow Automation: Design automated workflows catering to business needs where user interactions dynamically managed based on specific conditions
Keyword-Based Routing: Automatically escalating chats to supervisor based on keyword detection or routing inquiries to appropriate department
Confidence Threshold Control: Each AI action supports configurable thresholds to balance accuracy vs coverage and reduce hallucinations
LIMITATION: No programmatic personality management - tone/behavior settings dashboard-only, cannot modify per-user or via API (global configuration only)
LIMITATION: Training permissions bottleneck - only workspace owners can launch AI training sessions (team bottleneck for larger organizations)
Upload or overwrite docs any time—re-embeds almost instantly.
Behavior lives in your prompts; there’s no GUI for personas.
Multi-lingual works fine—just tell the LLM in your prompt.
Add metadata, tweak chunking—then build logic around it as needed.
Lets you add, remove, or tweak content on the fly—automatic re-indexing keeps everything current.
Shapes agent behavior through system prompts and sample Q&A, ensuring a consistent voice and focus.
Learn How to Update Sources
Supports multiple agents per account, so different teams can have their own bots.
Balances hands-on control with smart defaults—no deep ML expertise required to get tailored behavior.
Additional Considerations
Steep Learning Curve: Users frequently report steep learning curve for AI chatbot builder with complex workflows requiring significant time and technical understanding to implement effectively
Not Intuitive Without Technical Background: Getting AI chatbot and automated workflows running way more complex and time-consuming than expected - not intuitive unless you have technical background
Limited AI on Essentials Plan: AI heavily limited on Essentials plan (just 50 uses/month) - far too low for any real support automation in 2025, requires €295/month Plus plan for unlimited AI
Reliability Concerns: Several reviews mention significant bugs with worrying concern being occasional failure to deliver agent replies to customers severely impacting trust and support quality
Fewer Integrations: Fewer integrations compared to Zendesk or Intercom with analytics less comprehensive than enterprise solutions
Limited Advanced Features: Lacks advanced reporting, complex workflow automation, and sophisticated user management needed for larger fast-growing teams
Pricing Transparency Issues: Users frequently express frustration with unclear or confusing pricing - core AI and automation features only available in higher-tier plans with additional costs or limitations on "AI-powered resolutions" not immediately apparent
Scaling Cost Challenges: High-traffic teams quickly outgrow lower tiers which cap features like maximum seats, automation triggers, and integrations with many key advanced features locked behind higher-priced plans
AI as Add-On: Crisp started as communication platform first with AI features feeling like added layer on top rather than solution built around AI from beginning
Best For: Small businesses needing one central place for all customer chats just starting to explore very basic automation with strongest capabilities being shared inbox and live chat tools
NOT Ideal For: Teams wanting to seriously use AI to automate support where weak spots (limited AI uses, complex setup, reliability issues) become hard to ignore
No vendor lock-in: transparent code, offline option, host wherever you like.
Focuses on core RAG—no SSO, dashboards, or fancy UI included.
Great for devs who want full control or must keep data in-house.
Conversation flow, advanced prompts, fancy UI—all yours to build.
Slashes engineering overhead with an all-in-one RAG platform—no in-house ML team required.
Gets you to value quickly: launch a functional AI assistant in minutes.
Stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements, so you’re always on the latest tech.
Balances top-tier accuracy with ease of use, perfect for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects.
Limitations & Considerations
Platform classification: CUSTOMER MESSAGING PLATFORM with AI features, NOT a dedicated RAG-as-a-Service solution
AI usage constraints: 50 AI uses/month on Essentials (€95) creates automation barriers - unlimited requires €295 Plus tier
Manual retraining required: Website crawls need manual refresh requests (NO automatic sync for web content), only Knowledge Base articles auto-sync
Training permissions bottleneck: Only workspace owners can launch AI training sessions (team bottleneck for larger organizations)
No cloud storage integrations: Google Drive, Dropbox, Notion, OneDrive all absent without third-party workarounds
No YouTube transcript support: Cannot ingest video content for knowledge base
No programmatic bot management: Chatbots configured exclusively via dashboard's no-code builder, no API for bot creation or management
Missing RAG APIs: No vector store endpoints, no embedding generation API, no semantic search API, no context retrieval endpoint
Analytics dashboard-only: No analytics API for programmatic access to performance data or usage statistics
Certification gaps: SOC 2 absent (claims compliance without formal audit), no HIPAA, no ISO 27001 - limits regulated industry adoption
Template library limited: Users must build flows manually vs competitors with extensive template libraries
Use case fit: Excellent for businesses wanting to USE AI-powered customer support; does NOT serve developers wanting to BUILD custom RAG applications
No GUI/dashboard: Everything via API or CLI - no business-user interface for content management, analytics, or configuration
Developer-only tool: Requires coding skills for setup, integration, and maintenance - non-technical teams cannot use without developer support
Basic RAG only: Standard retrieval-augmented generation without advanced features like hybrid search, query reranking, multi-query fusion, or query expansion
No observability built-in: No metrics dashboard, conversation analytics, or performance monitoring - must wire up your own logging layer
Manual hallucination handling: No built-in citation validation, confidence scoring, or factual consistency checks - developers must implement safeguards
Limited connectors: No one-click Google Drive, Notion, or cloud storage integrations - must script data fetching and API uploads manually
No conversation management: Stateless API calls without chat history, multi-turn context, or session management - build conversation layer yourself
Infrastructure knowledge required: Self-hosting requires Supabase, Postgres, and vector database expertise - not plug-and-play for non-DevOps teams
Minimal abstraction: Intentionally low-level API design provides control but requires more integration work than higher-level RAG platforms
Managed service approach: Less control over underlying RAG pipeline configuration compared to build-your-own solutions like LangChain
Vendor lock-in: Proprietary platform - migration to alternative RAG solutions requires rebuilding knowledge bases
Model selection: Limited to OpenAI (GPT-5.1 and 4 series) and Anthropic (Claude, opus and sonnet 4.5) - no support for other LLM providers (Cohere, AI21, open-source models)
Pricing at scale: Flat-rate pricing may become expensive for very high-volume use cases (millions of queries/month) compared to pay-per-use models
Customization limits: While highly configurable, some advanced RAG techniques (custom reranking, hybrid search strategies) may not be exposed
Language support: Supports 90+ languages but performance may vary for less common languages or specialized domains
Real-time data: Knowledge bases require re-indexing for updates - not ideal for real-time data requirements (stock prices, live inventory)
Enterprise features: Some advanced features (custom SSO, token authentication) only available on Enterprise plan with custom pricing
Customization & Branding
UI customization: Colors, branding, positioning, custom triggers per page, proactive messages with personalization tokens
Widget white-labeling (Plus €295/month): Remove "We run on Crisp" watermark, custom email domains, custom Knowledge Base domains
Chatbot personality: Custom prompts define tone and behavior, bot name customization, composition animations for human-like feel, brand voice alignment
A/B testing: Placement and copy testing for optimization of engagement and conversion rates
Multi-lingual support: Automatic language detection from browser settings, phone number prefixes, account preferences with chatbot block translation across locales
Domain allowlisting: Control where widget appears for security and brand protection
LIMITATION: Advanced CSS customization capabilities unclear - platform favors preset options over deep styling control (vs competitors with full CSS access)
LIMITATION: Domain restrictions for widget deployment not explicitly documented - transparency gap for security configuration
LIMITATION: Programmatic personality management absent - tone/behavior settings dashboard-only, cannot modify per-user or via API (global configuration only)
No pre-made UI, no theming—branding lives in whatever front-end you create.
Open source means zero “Supavec” label to hide—your app, your look.
Add domain checks or auth however you like in your code.
It’s “white-label” by default because Supavec is API-only.
Fully white-labels the widget—colors, logos, icons, CSS, everything can match your brand.
White-label Options
Provides a no-code dashboard to set welcome messages, bot names, and visual themes.
Lets you shape the AI’s persona and tone using pre-prompts and system instructions.
Uses domain allowlisting to ensure the chatbot appears only on approved sites.
Wizard-style setup: Guided configuration for data sources, AI training, widget embedding
LIMITATION: Pre-built templates limited - no industry-specific templates (e-commerce, SaaS support, lead qualification) out of box (7/10 rated - functional but requires customization effort)
LIMITATION: Setting up automated workflows can take time for users unfamiliar with automation tools
LIMITATION: While no-code, lacks advanced AI-powered features found in dedicated chatbot platforms like Intercom or Drift
No drag-and-drop dashboard—everything's via API or CLI.
Meant for code-first teams who'll bolt it into their own chat or workflow.
Self-hosters can craft custom GUIs on top, but Supavec keeps the slate blank.
If you want a business-user UI like CustomGPT, you'll layer that yourself.
Offers a wizard-style web dashboard so non-devs can upload content, brand the widget, and monitor performance.
Supports drag-and-drop uploads, visual theme editing, and in-browser chatbot testing.
User Experience Review
Uses role-based access so business users and devs can collaborate smoothly.
Confidence threshold system: Adjustable thresholds across 4 AI actions to balance accuracy vs. coverage and reduce hallucinations
Uncertainty admission: AI explicitly states when it cannot find relevant information rather than fabricating responses
Multi-lingual accuracy: Automatic language detection with real-time translation for global support consistency
Mirage AI improvements: November 2024 retrain with 10x more data for enhanced response quality
LIMITATION: Some reports of throttling or lag under heavy traffic with integrations or bots facing high volume
LIMITATION: Occasional delays in mobile notifications reported (not widespread)
LIMITATION: API usage quotas exist - enterprise scaling documentation minimal with no SLA guarantees in public docs
LIMITATION: No benchmark results for accuracy published - no quantitative validation of RAG performance claims
LIMITATION: No mechanism to programmatically inject context or fine-tune retrieval behavior for improved accuracy
Accuracy = GPT quality + standard RAG lift—no extra guardrails.
Postgres vector search keeps retrieval snappy, even with millions of chunks.
No public head-to-head benchmarks yet; expect “typical GPT-3.5/4 RAG” results.
If you want citations or extra checks, you’ll prompt-engineer them yourself.
Delivers sub-second replies with an optimized pipeline—efficient vector search, smart chunking, and caching.
Independent tests rate median answer accuracy at 5/5—outpacing many alternatives.
Benchmark Results
Always cites sources so users can verify facts on the spot.
Maintains speed and accuracy even for massive knowledge bases with tens of millions of words.
Core Agent Features
N/A
Stateless RAG Architecture: Pure retrieval and generation without built-in conversation state—developers implement multi-turn context and session management in application layer
Model-Agnostic Generation: Defaults to GPT-3.5 but supports GPT-4, self-hosted LLMs (Llama, Mistral), and any OpenAI-compatible models—no vendor lock-in for generation
Postgres Vector Search: Fast approximate nearest neighbor search using pgvector extension with cosine similarity—handles millions of chunks efficiently at enterprise scale
Metadata Filtering: Custom metadata tagging and filtering capabilities enabling organized knowledge management and multi-tenant architectures
Real-Time Re-Indexing: Almost instant document re-embedding when updating or overwriting knowledge sources—no lengthy reprocessing delays
REST API Foundation: Straightforward endpoints for file uploads, text uploads, and search with plain-JSON responses—easy integration from any programming language
Supabase Integration: Built on Supabase infrastructure leveraging PostgreSQL, Row-Level Security (RLS), and battle-tested backend for familiar deployment
LIMITATION - No Built-In Chat UI: API-only platform requiring developers to build custom chat interfaces—not a turnkey chatbot solution with widgets
LIMITATION - No Lead Capture: No built-in lead generation, email collection, or CRM integration capabilities—must be implemented at application layer
LIMITATION - No Human Handoff: No escalation workflows, live agent transfer, or fallback mechanisms—conversational features are developer responsibility
LIMITATION - No Multi-Channel Integrations: No native Slack, Teams, WhatsApp, or messaging platform connectors—developers build integration layer
LIMITATION - No Session Management: Stateless API design without conversation history tracking or multi-turn context retention—application must manage state
LIMITATION - No Advanced RAG: Missing hybrid search, reranking, knowledge graphs, multi-query retrieval, query expansion found in enterprise platforms
LIMITATION - No Observability Dashboard: No analytics, conversation metrics, or performance monitoring UI—must integrate external logging tools
Custom AI Agents: Build autonomous agents powered by GPT-4 and Claude that can perform tasks independently and make real-time decisions based on business knowledge
Decision-Support Capabilities: AI agents analyze proprietary data to provide insights, recommendations, and actionable responses specific to your business domain
Multi-Agent Systems: Deploy multiple specialized AI agents that can collaborate and optimize workflows in areas like customer support, sales, and internal knowledge management
Memory & Context Management: Agents maintain conversation history and persistent context for coherent multi-turn interactions
View Agent Documentation
Tool Integration: Agents can trigger actions, integrate with external APIs via webhooks, and connect to 5,000+ apps through Zapier for automated workflows
Hyper-Accurate Responses: Leverages advanced RAG technology and retrieval mechanisms to deliver context-aware, citation-backed responses grounded in your knowledge base
Continuous Learning: Agents improve over time through automatic re-indexing of knowledge sources and integration of new data without manual retraining
After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both Crisp and Supavec are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.
When to Choose Crisp
You value omnichannel messaging with native whatsapp, messenger, instagram, telegram, twitter/x, sms, line, slack integrations
600,000+ businesses served demonstrating mature product-market fit
Proprietary Mirage AI model plus third-party LLM support (GPT-4o, Claude, Llama, Dialogflow)
Best For: Omnichannel messaging with native WhatsApp, Messenger, Instagram, Telegram, Twitter/X, SMS, Line, Slack integrations
When to Choose Supavec
You value 100% open source with no vendor lock-in
Complete control over data and infrastructure
Strong privacy with Supabase RLS integration
Best For: 100% open source with no vendor lock-in
Migration & Switching Considerations
Switching between Crisp and Supavec requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.
Pricing Comparison Summary
Crisp starts at $45/month, while Supavec begins at custom pricing. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.
Our Recommendation Process
Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality
For most organizations, the decision between Crisp and Supavec comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.
📚 Next Steps
Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.
• Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
• Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
• Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
• Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements
Last updated: December 11, 2025 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.
The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.
DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.
People Also Compare
Explore more AI tool comparisons to find the perfect solution for your needs
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...