In this comprehensive guide, we compare Glean and Stonly across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.
Overview
When choosing between Glean and Stonly, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose Glean if: you value permissions-aware ai is genuinely differentiated - real-time enforcement across 100+ datasources addresses critical enterprise concern
Choose Stonly if: you value exceptional ease of use - 4.8/5 g2 rating with intuitive visual editor praised in 32 reviews
About Glean
Glean is enterprise work ai with permissions-aware rag across 100+ apps. Glean is a premium enterprise RAG platform with permissions-aware AI as its core differentiator. Founded by ex-Google Search engineers, Glean achieved $100M ARR in three years and a $7.2B valuation (2025). It connects 100+ enterprise apps with real-time access controls, supports 15+ LLMs, and offers comprehensive APIs with 4-language SDKs. Trade-offs: enterprise-only sales (~$50/user/month, ~$60K minimum), no consumer messaging channels, and premium positioning over plug-and-play simplicity. Founded in 2019, headquartered in Palo Alto, CA, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
96/100
Starting Price
$50/mo
About Stonly
Stonly is interactive knowledge base platform with enterprise ai-powered answers. Stonly is a customer support knowledge management platform with embedded AI capabilities focused on interactive step-by-step guides and help desk agent assistance. Its AI Answers feature (Enterprise-only add-on) achieves 71% self-serve success rates, but it's fundamentally a knowledge base platform with AI features—not a pure RAG-as-a-Service solution. Founded in 2017, headquartered in San Francisco, CA, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
96/100
Starting Price
$249/mo
Key Differences at a Glance
In terms of user ratings, both platforms score similarly in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, Glean starts at a lower price point. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: Enterprise RAG versus Knowledge Management. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.
⚠️ What This Comparison Covers
We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.
Detailed Feature Comparison
Glean
Stonly
CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
100+ native connectors covering major enterprise categories
Cloud Storage: Google Drive, SharePoint, OneDrive, Dropbox, Box
Communication: Slack, Microsoft Teams, Gmail, Outlook, Zoom
Indexing API: 10 requests/second for bulk operations, ProcessAll limited to once per 3 hours
PDF uploads confirmed
Public website crawling: Pages not requiring authentication
Zendesk help center content indexing
Proprietary interactive guide format as primary content model
Note: No Google Drive, Dropbox, Notion, or SharePoint integrations for data ingestion
Note: No YouTube transcript extraction (videos can be embedded but not processed)
Note: No direct Word document (.docx) or HTML file imports confirmed
Note: No automatic content syncing from external sources - updates are manual through Stonly's visual editor
Content limits by tier: Basic (5 guides, 400 views/mo), Small Business (unlimited guides, 4K views/mo), Enterprise (custom)
Content versioning: Side-by-side comparison and instant restore on Business and Enterprise plans
Lets you ingest more than 1,400 file formats—PDF, DOCX, TXT, Markdown, HTML, and many more—via simple drag-and-drop or API.
Crawls entire sites through sitemaps and URLs, automatically indexing public help-desk articles, FAQs, and docs.
Turns multimedia into text on the fly: YouTube videos, podcasts, and other media are auto-transcribed with built-in OCR and speech-to-text.
View Transcription Guide
Connects to Google Drive, SharePoint, Notion, Confluence, HubSpot, and more through API connectors or Zapier.
See Zapier Connectors
Supports both manual uploads and auto-sync retraining, so your knowledge base always stays up to date.
L L M Model Options
Model Hub supports 15+ LLMs across multiple hosting providers
OpenAI: GPT-3.5, GPT-4
Azure OpenAI: GPT models
Google Vertex AI: Gemini 1.5 Pro
Amazon Bedrock: Claude 3 Sonnet
Per-step model selection: Different LLMs for each workflow step
Temperature controls: Factual, balanced, or creative output settings
Model tiers: Basic, Standard, Premium (premium consumes FlexCredits on Enterprise Flex)
Two access options: Glean Universal Key (managed) or Customer Key (BYOK)
Zero data retention: Customer data never used for model training
Automatic model updates: Deprecated models replaced with latest versions
Automatic routing: Optimizes using best-in-class models per query type
Note: Undisclosed proprietary LLM - Stonly does not disclose the specific model powering AI Answers
Note: No model selection - users cannot choose between GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Claude, or other models
Note: No temperature controls, fine-tuning, or model routing
AI Profiles: Up to 20 per team for tone and behavior customization
Custom Instructions: Up to 100 per team defining boundaries and style
Guided AI Answers: Define specific questions that trigger predetermined answers, bypassing AI generation for sensitive scenarios
Automatic fallback: When AI confidence is low, system falls back to ML-powered search rather than forcing an answer
Knowledge-grounded approach: AI responses anchored in Stonly guides, external websites, and selected PDFs to reduce hallucinations
Taps into top models—OpenAI’s GPT-4, GPT-3.5 Turbo, and even Anthropic’s Claude for enterprise needs.
Automatically balances cost and performance by picking the right model for each request.
Model Selection Details
Uses proprietary prompt engineering and retrieval tweaks to return high-quality, citation-backed answers.
Handles all model management behind the scenes—no extra API keys or fine-tuning steps for you.
Performance & Accuracy
74% human-agreement rate on AI Evaluator benchmarks
25% precision increases reported in customer case studies
20% response time decreases documented
141% ROI over 3 years (Forrester Total Economic Impact study)
$15.6M NPV for composite organizations
110 hours saved per employee annually
AI Evaluator metrics: Context relevance, recall, answer relevance, completeness, groundedness
Core Architecture: Serverless RAG infrastructure with automatic embedding generation, vector search optimization, and LLM orchestration fully managed behind API endpoints
API-First Design: Comprehensive REST API with well-documented endpoints for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data (1,400+ formats), and querying chat
API Documentation
Developer Experience: Open-source Python SDK (customgpt-client), Postman collections, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, and extensive cookbooks for rapid integration
No-Code Alternative: Wizard-style web dashboard enables non-developers to upload content, brand widgets, and deploy chatbots without touching code
Hybrid Target Market: Serves both developer teams wanting robust APIs AND business users seeking no-code RAG deployment - unique positioning vs pure API platforms (Cohere) or pure no-code tools (Jotform)
RAG Technology Leadership: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, proprietary anti-hallucination mechanisms, and citation-backed responses
Benchmark Details
Deployment Flexibility: Cloud-hosted SaaS with auto-scaling, API integrations, embedded chat widgets, ChatGPT Plugin support, and hosted MCP Server for Claude/Cursor/ChatGPT
Enterprise Readiness: SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling, domain allowlisting, RBAC with 2FA/SSO, and flat-rate pricing without per-query charges
Use Case Fit: Ideal for organizations needing both rapid no-code deployment AND robust API capabilities, teams handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), and businesses requiring production-ready RAG without building ML infrastructure from scratch
Competitive Positioning: Bridges the gap between developer-first platforms (Cohere, Deepset) requiring heavy coding and no-code chatbot builders (Jotform, Kommunicate) lacking API depth - offers best of both worlds
Competitive Positioning
vs CustomGPT: Enterprise-premium vs developer-friendly; permissions-aware AI vs flexible customization
vs Zendesk: Enterprise search + RAG vs customer service platform
Unique strength: Real-time permissions-aware AI across 100+ datasources (no competitor matches this)
Target audience: Large enterprises (1K-100K users) with complex permission hierarchies
Pricing barrier: ~$50/user/month with ~$60K minimum excludes SMBs
Enterprise focus: Security, governance, compliance over plug-and-play simplicity
Unique strength: Interactive guide format for structured support content
vs CustomGPT: Not comparable - different product categories (knowledge base vs RAG-as-a-Service)
vs Zendesk: Lighter-weight alternative focused on self-service guides vs full customer service platform
vs traditional chatbots: Interactive guides provide structured paths vs free-form conversation
Target audience: Support teams using Zendesk/Salesforce, not developers building RAG applications
70-76% ticket reduction documented in case studies
71% self-serve success rate with AI Answers
Enterprise compliance suitable for regulated industries
Market position: Leading all-in-one RAG platform balancing enterprise-grade accuracy with developer-friendly APIs and no-code usability for rapid deployment
Target customers: Mid-market to enterprise organizations needing production-ready AI assistants, development teams wanting robust APIs without building RAG infrastructure, and businesses requiring 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription (YouTube, podcasts)
Key competitors: OpenAI Assistants API, Botsonic, Chatbase.co, Azure AI, and custom RAG implementations using LangChain
Competitive advantages: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling included, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, hosted MCP Server support (Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT), generous data limits (60M words Standard, 300M Premium), and flat monthly pricing without per-query charges
Pricing advantage: Transparent flat-rate pricing at $99/month (Standard) and $449/month (Premium) with generous included limits; no hidden costs for API access, branding removal, or basic features; best value for teams needing both no-code dashboard and developer APIs in one platform
Use case fit: Ideal for businesses needing both rapid no-code deployment and robust API capabilities, organizations handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), teams requiring white-label chatbots with source citations for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects, and companies wanting all-in-one RAG without managing ML infrastructure
A I Models
Model Hub supports 15+ LLMs across multiple hosting providers with per-step model selection
OpenAI: GPT-3.5, GPT-4 via OpenAI or Azure OpenAI endpoints
Google Vertex AI: Gemini 1.5 Pro with multimodal capabilities
Amazon Bedrock: Claude 3 Sonnet for high-accuracy enterprise use cases
Temperature controls: Factual, balanced, or creative output settings per workflow
Model tiers: Basic, Standard, Premium (premium consumes FlexCredits on Enterprise Flex plan)
Two access options: Glean Universal Key (managed) or Customer Key (BYOK) for data sovereignty
Zero data retention: Customer data never used for model training with automatic model updates
Automatic routing: Optimizes using best-in-class models per query type for accuracy and cost
Undisclosed Proprietary LLM: Stonly does not publicly disclose the specific model powering AI Answers feature
No Model Selection: Users cannot choose between GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, or other LLM providers
No Temperature Controls: No user-facing controls for adjusting response creativity, randomness, or formatting
No Fine-Tuning or Model Routing: Cannot customize model behavior beyond predefined AI Profiles and Custom Instructions
AI Profiles (Up to 20): Define tone, boundaries, and behavior for different use cases or audiences
Custom Instructions (Up to 100): Set specific rules and style guidelines for AI response generation
Guided AI Answers: Predefined responses for specific questions bypassing AI generation for sensitive scenarios
Automatic Fallback: Low-confidence scenarios trigger fallback to ML-powered search rather than forcing unreliable AI answer
Knowledge-Grounded Approach: AI responses anchored in Stonly guides, external websites, and PDFs to reduce hallucinations
Primary models: GPT-4, GPT-3.5 Turbo from OpenAI, and Anthropic's Claude for enterprise needs
Automatic model selection: Balances cost and performance by automatically selecting the appropriate model for each request
Model Selection Details
Proprietary optimizations: Custom prompt engineering and retrieval enhancements for high-quality, citation-backed answers
Managed infrastructure: All model management handled behind the scenes - no API keys or fine-tuning required from users
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms ensure chatbot only answers based on provided content, improving trust and factual accuracy
R A G Capabilities
Hybrid search: Combines semantic (vector-based) and lexical (keyword) approaches for maximum accuracy
Knowledge Graph Framework: Proprietary anchors and signals across enterprise data with rich, scalable crawler
LLM Control Layer: Optimizes and controls LLM outputs with permission-safe document retrieval and ranking
Real-time permissions enforcement: Users only see authorized content with identity crawling and connector-level permission mirroring
Context-aware query rewriting: LLM determines optimal query set with enterprise-specific rewrites
Hallucination prevention: RAG grounding, permission-aware retrieval, citation/source attribution for every answer
74% human-agreement rate on AI Evaluator benchmarks with 25% precision increases in customer case studies
141% ROI over 3 years: $15.6M NPV for composite organizations, 110 hours saved per employee annually (Forrester)
Permissions-aware AI (unique): Real-time access control enforcement across all 100+ datasources - no competitor matches this capability
AI Answers (Enterprise Add-On): Generative AI responses grounded in Stonly guides, external websites, and selected PDFs
Knowledge-Grounding: Responses anchored to structured content (interactive guides, decision trees, checklists) reducing hallucinations vs generic chatbots
Confidence-Based Fallback: Automatic switch to ML-powered search when AI confidence is low preventing unreliable answers
Multi-Source Ingestion: PDF uploads, public website crawling, Zendesk help center content indexing
Interactive Guide Format: Proprietary content model combining structured workflows with AI-generated answers
Limited Data Sources: No Google Drive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint, or YouTube transcript extraction
Manual Content Updates: Updates through Stonly's visual editor—no automatic syncing from external sources
71% Self-Serve Success Rate: Documented effectiveness of AI Answers in reducing support escalations
Hallucination Controls: Strong grounding in structured content vs open-ended conversational AI
Core architecture: GPT-4 combined with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology, outperforming OpenAI in RAG benchmarks
RAG Performance
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms reduce hallucinations and ensure responses are grounded in provided content
Benchmark Details
Automatic citations: Each response includes clickable citations pointing to original source documents for transparency and verification
Optimized pipeline: Efficient vector search, smart chunking, and caching for sub-second reply times
Scalability: Maintains speed and accuracy for massive knowledge bases with tens of millions of words
Context-aware conversations: Multi-turn conversations with persistent history and comprehensive conversation management
Source verification: Always cites sources so users can verify facts on the spot
Use Cases
Enterprise knowledge retrieval: Unified search across 100+ datasources (Google Drive, SharePoint, Confluence, Salesforce, Zendesk, GitHub, Slack) for 10K-100K user organizations
Permissions-aware search: Complex permission hierarchies requiring real-time enforcement - healthcare, finance, legal industries with sensitive data access controls
AI agents and automation: 30+ prebuilt agents for sales, engineering, IT, HR use cases with workflow automation capabilities
Developer-friendly RAG: Official SDKs (Python, Java, Go, TypeScript), LangChain integration, MCP Server for Claude Desktop/Cursor/VS Code
Active Data Governance: Continuous scanning with 100+ predefined infotypes (PII, PCI, M&A) and customizable policies with auto-hide
Cloud-Prem deployment: Customer-hosted in AWS or GCP for regulated industries requiring full data residency control
NOT suitable for: SMBs with <100 users or <$60K budgets, simple document Q&A without permission requirements, consumer messaging channels (WhatsApp, Telegram)
Customer Support Ticket Deflection: 70-76% ticket reduction through interactive self-service guides and AI Answers
Help Desk Integration: Deep Zendesk, Salesforce Service Cloud, Freshdesk, ServiceNow integration for unified support workflows
Interactive Onboarding: Step-by-step guides, decision trees, and checklists for product onboarding and user education
Knowledge Base Enhancement: Augment traditional help centers with interactive guides and AI-powered search
Agent Assistance: Provide support agents with guided workflows and AI answers during live interactions
Multi-Language Support: Auto-translation on Enterprise plan for global support teams and multilingual customers
Complex Troubleshooting: Decision tree logic guides users through multi-step troubleshooting processes
Compliance & Training: Structured guides ensuring consistent information delivery for regulated industries
Customer support automation: AI assistants handling common queries, reducing support ticket volume, providing 24/7 instant responses with source citations
Internal knowledge management: Employee self-service for HR policies, technical documentation, onboarding materials, company procedures across 1,400+ file formats
Sales enablement: Product information chatbots, lead qualification, customer education with white-labeled widgets on websites and apps
Documentation assistance: Technical docs, help centers, FAQs with automatic website crawling and sitemap indexing
Educational platforms: Course materials, research assistance, student support with multimedia content (YouTube transcriptions, podcasts)
Healthcare information: Patient education, medical knowledge bases (SOC 2 Type II compliant for sensitive data)
Automatic Tier Upgrades: Exceeding limits for 2 consecutive months triggers automatic upgrade and billing adjustment
Enterprise-Gated Features: AI Answers, Mobile SDKs, SAML SSO, white-labeling all require Enterprise plan
Average Enterprise Contract: ~$39,000 annually according to Vendr procurement data
Standard Plan: $99/month or $89/month annual - 10 custom chatbots, 5,000 items per chatbot, 60 million words per bot, basic helpdesk support, standard security
View Pricing
Premium Plan: $499/month or $449/month annual - 100 custom chatbots, 20,000 items per chatbot, 300 million words per bot, advanced support, enhanced security, additional customization
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing - Comprehensive AI solutions, highest security and compliance, dedicated account managers, custom SSO, token authentication, priority support with faster SLAs
Enterprise Solutions
7-Day Free Trial: Full access to Standard features without charges - available to all users
Annual billing discount: Save 10% by paying upfront annually ($89/mo Standard, $449/mo Premium)
Flat monthly rates: No per-query charges, no hidden costs for API access or white-labeling (included in all plans)
Managed infrastructure: Auto-scaling cloud infrastructure included - no additional hosting or scaling fees
Support & Documentation
Standard support: 24x5 (Mon-Fri) via portal, email, Slack Connect channels
Premium support: 24x7 for critical issues with additional fee
Dedicated CSMs: Enterprise accounts with hands-on onboarding and regular business reviews
Excellent documentation: developers.glean.com with OpenAPI specs, CodeSandbox demos, comprehensive API references
Official SDKs: Python (pip install glean), Java (Maven), Go, TypeScript with async support and framework integrations
Web SDK: @gleanwork/web-sdk for embeddable components (chat, search, autocomplete, recommendations)
GitHub repositories: github.com/gleanwork with SDK repositories and sample projects
NO FedRAMP certification: Not suitable for US federal government deployments
Limited consumer channels: No native WhatsApp, Telegram integrations - designed for internal enterprise use only
Complex implementation: Initial indexing takes "few days" depending on data volume, requires enterprise IT coordination
Cross-language queries in early access: English query finding Spanish documents still in testing phase
Best for: Large enterprises (1K-100K users) with complex permission hierarchies, $60K+ budgets, and need for permissions-aware AI across 100+ datasources
NOT suitable for: SMBs, startups, simple document Q&A without permission requirements, organizations prioritizing transparent pricing
NOT a RAG-as-a-Service Platform: Fundamentally a knowledge base tool with embedded AI—not a flexible RAG backend
AI Answers Enterprise-Gated: Core AI capabilities require expensive Enterprise plan (~$39K/year)—not available on $249/month Small Business tier
Undisclosed AI Model: No transparency on LLM provider—users cannot select or customize models
Limited Data Source Flexibility: PDF, public web, Zendesk only—missing Google Drive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint, YouTube
No Automatic Content Syncing: Manual updates through visual editor—no real-time integration with external knowledge sources
Missing Consumer Messaging: No Slack, WhatsApp, Telegram, Microsoft Teams native integrations (confirmed by user reviews)
No Omnichannel Messaging: Primarily website embedding and help desk integration—limited multi-channel support
Cannot Edit on Mobile: Guide creation and editing restricted to desktop—mobile limitation for on-the-go teams
No Real-Time Analytics: Flow reports update every 15 minutes—not true real-time monitoring
Limited Developer API: No Python/Node.js SDKs, GraphQL, Swagger specs, or API sandbox for testing
Overage Pricing Escalation: View limits can trigger expensive automatic upgrades after 2 consecutive months
Not Ideal For: Developers seeking pure RAG API, multi-tenant SaaS RAG backends, use cases needing model selection/fine-tuning, or flexible data source integration
Managed service approach: Less control over underlying RAG pipeline configuration compared to build-your-own solutions like LangChain
Vendor lock-in: Proprietary platform - migration to alternative RAG solutions requires rebuilding knowledge bases
Model selection: Limited to OpenAI (GPT-4, GPT-3.5) and Anthropic (Claude) - no support for other LLM providers (Cohere, AI21, open-source models)
Pricing at scale: Flat-rate pricing may become expensive for very high-volume use cases (millions of queries/month) compared to pay-per-use models
Customization limits: While highly configurable, some advanced RAG techniques (custom reranking, hybrid search strategies) may not be exposed
Language support: Supports 90+ languages but performance may vary for less common languages or specialized domains
Real-time data: Knowledge bases require re-indexing for updates - not ideal for real-time data requirements (stock prices, live inventory)
Enterprise features: Some advanced features (custom SSO, token authentication) only available on Enterprise plan with custom pricing
Core Agent Features
Autonomous AI agents: Agents use AI to understand tasks and take action on behalf of users from answering questions and retrieving information to executing work autonomously
Natural language agent builder: Build agents by describing desired output in simple natural language - Glean understands goal and designs complex multi-step workflows
Agentic reasoning engine: LLM-agnostic engine enables agents to go beyond retrieval and generation - powers sophisticated automation and decision-making by understanding outcomes, building multi-step plans, and using action library
100+ native actions: Supports 100+ new native actions across Slack, Microsoft Teams, Salesforce, Jira, GitHub, Google Workspace and other applications
MCP host support: Gives agents dramatically larger surface area to operate across enterprise applications
Human-in-the-loop design: Agents can autonomously do work end-to-end with human review checkpoints - process customer support tickets, conduct research, prepare responses for employee review before execution
Vibe coding: Upgraded builder makes agent creation as simple as chatting - anyone (not just developers) can create and refine agents without understanding or interacting with code
Grounded in enterprise data: Autonomous agents grounded in most relevant authoritative information for confident work automation
Automatic agent triggering: Orchestrates agents automatically based on schedules or events and surfaces agent recommendations across enterprise
Visual and conversational workflow design: Turn ideas into structured workflows using simple natural language prompts or visual builder
Conversational AI Bot: Delivers confident answers backed by verified structured knowledge unlike generic LLMs that can hallucinate or invent answers
Knowledge-grounded responses: Provides answers backed by verified structured knowledge from guides you create preventing fabricated information
AI Agent Assist: Automatically summarizes tickets, suggests right path to resolution, and generates responses for support agents
Three core automation functions: Automatically analyzes and summarizes support ticket content, recommends most relevant Stonly guide/knowledge path to resolve issues, drafts complete responses for agents to review/edit/send
Process automation: Define processes to be followed and link them to different back-office tools to resolve customer requests before they reach support
Personalized knowledge: AI-powered solutions and process automation allow creation of guides, walkthroughs, checklists, knowledge bases adapting to each customer's needs
71% self-serve success rate: With AI Answers feature documented in company data
Hallucination reduction: Knowledge-grounding approach vs generic chatbots reduces off-topic responses
Custom AI Agents: Build autonomous agents powered by GPT-4 and Claude that can perform tasks independently and make real-time decisions based on business knowledge
Decision-Support Capabilities: AI agents analyze proprietary data to provide insights, recommendations, and actionable responses specific to your business domain
Multi-Agent Systems: Deploy multiple specialized AI agents that can collaborate and optimize workflows in areas like customer support, sales, and internal knowledge management
Memory & Context Management: Agents maintain conversation history and persistent context for coherent multi-turn interactions
View Agent Documentation
Tool Integration: Agents can trigger actions, integrate with external APIs via webhooks, and connect to 5,000+ apps through Zapier for automated workflows
Hyper-Accurate Responses: Leverages advanced RAG technology and retrieval mechanisms to deliver context-aware, citation-backed responses grounded in your knowledge base
Continuous Learning: Agents improve over time through automatic re-indexing of knowledge sources and integration of new data without manual retraining
Additional Considerations
Cannot create content directly: Glean focuses purely on search and retrieval - not suitable for organizations needing content creation within platform
Platform designed for large organizations: Feature set and pricing optimized for large enterprises - smaller teams may find it overkill and less cost-effective
AI production challenges: 68% of organizations report moving only 30% or fewer AI experiments into full production highlighting persistent scaling difficulties beyond proof-of-concept
Integration complexity: Requires strategic overhaul of processes to ensure seamless technology incorporation into existing workflows
Change management: Overcoming resistance to change demands strong leadership and commitment to fostering innovation and adaptability environment
Data reliability monitoring: Potential for inaccuracies in AI outputs necessitates rigorous monitoring frameworks to ensure data reliability and trustworthiness
Cybersecurity concerns: As AI deployment expands, cybersecurity threats become more pronounced requiring enhanced protective measures for sensitive information
Bias in AI models: Models can inadvertently learn and replicate biases in training data leading to unfair or discriminatory outcomes particularly in hiring, customer service, legal decisions
Training investment required: Enterprises must invest in training workforce to effectively use AI tools - upskilling employees, hiring AI talent, or partnering with consultants
Security risks and shadow IT: Many organizations hesitate due to uncertainties from security risks and shadow IT - ad hoc generative AI adoption comes with heavy risks and costs
Limited UI customization: Limited ability to customize user interface and workflows to match specific brand requirements is primary user concern
Basic collaboration tools: Without real-time editing or advanced team management features can hinder team productivity when multiple people need to work together
No offline access: Guides unavailable without internet connectivity reducing usability in areas with unreliable internet
Performance degradation: Can degrade with very large or complex guides causing slower responsiveness indicating scalability concerns
Restricted language options: Limit efficient creation of multilingual content which may be barrier for global organizations
Mixed media support missing: Users find missing features wishing for mixed media support and enhanced reporting tools
Step ordering difficulties: Users report limitations in feature usability and difficulties with step ordering though support offers helpful workarounds
Requires coding knowledge: Unlike most competitors, doesn't advertise as no-code platform - need coding knowledge to track events, target users, stream data, and style content
Image workflow limitations: Inability to use images in base offering limits utility in some workflows with some advanced features requiring extra costs
View-based pricing: Charges additional fees based on guide views - customers exceeding 4,000 guide views/month pay extra $250-500 monthly depending on volume
Integration reliability: Users find lack of integrations limits ability to fully connect Stonly with other tools - Stonly/Zendesk integration isn't as reliable as desired (stops working every few weeks)
Slashes engineering overhead with an all-in-one RAG platform—no in-house ML team required.
Gets you to value quickly: launch a functional AI assistant in minutes.
Stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements, so you’re always on the latest tech.
Balances top-tier accuracy with ease of use, perfect for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects.
Core Chatbot Features
Glean Chat interface: Primary interface for interacting with Glean Assistant offering familiar chat-like experience enabling natural conversations with company knowledge base
Multi-turn conversations: Supports conversational AI with natural language and context awareness maintaining context across conversation turns
Streaming responses: Real-time response streaming for better user experience with automatic source citations for transparency
Chatbot context understanding: Understands thread and sequence of conversations tracking references like "their" and "they" across multiple exchanges
Enterprise knowledge integration: Works across all company apps and knowledge sources including Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Salesforce, Jira, GitHub and nearly 100 more applications
Personalization and security: Delivers answers highly customized to each user based on deep understanding of company content, employees, and activity while adhering to real-time enterprise data permissions and governance rules
Citation and transparency: Provides full linking to source information across documents, conversations and applications for transparency and trust
Simple chatbot API: Powerful tool for integrating conversational AI into products creating custom conversational interfaces leveraging Glean's AI capabilities
Use case flexibility: Build chatbots answering customer questions using help documentation, FAQs, knowledge bases or create internal tools helping employees find company policies, procedures, documentation
Natural language configuration: Build and configure agents by describing goals in plain language without technical expertise
Visual builder option: Alternative drag-and-drop workflow creation for those preferring visual interface
AI-assisted creation: Glean suggests starting points and auto-generates draft agents based on description
Agent Library templates: 30+ prebuilt agents for sales, engineering, IT, HR use cases as starting points
Per-step model selection: Different LLMs for each workflow step with temperature controls (factual, balanced, creative)
Model tiers: Basic, Standard, Premium models with FlexCredits for premium consumption on Enterprise Flex
Two access options: Glean Universal Key (managed) or Customer Key (BYOK) for data sovereignty
Zero data retention: Customer data never used for model training with automatic model updates
RBAC hierarchy: Setup Admin, Admin, Super Admin roles with granular permissions
Process knowledge integration: Glean uses underlying process knowledge to inform agent design and workflow optimization
CSS and HTML customization: Change layout and look of knowledge base with custom code capabilities
Intuitive customization tools: Easy-to-use tools that don't require code for basic customization
Layout customization: Decide how content is structured and presented with flexible options
Design controls: Manage visual components like colors, logo, or cover image for brand alignment
Personalized content: Use customer data to show personalized content from knowledge base for targeted experiences
Data-driven personalization: Customers see what they need right away when first accessing knowledge base
Analytics insights: Guide usage analytics provide insight into customer behavior for continuous improvement
Highly flexible platform: Users appreciate ability to use Stonly for knowledge bases and guided tours with target properties based on specific user needs
Rich media support: Add images, GIFs, videos, and annotations to bring knowledge base content to life
Third-party scripts: Install scripts from other tools like Google Analytics for extended functionality
Lets you add, remove, or tweak content on the fly—automatic re-indexing keeps everything current.
Shapes agent behavior through system prompts and sample Q&A, ensuring a consistent voice and focus.
Learn How to Update Sources
Supports multiple agents per account, so different teams can have their own bots.
Balances hands-on control with smart defaults—no deep ML expertise required to get tailored behavior.
Core Knowledge Base Features
N/A
Interactive step-by-step guides with visual flow builder
After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both Glean and Stonly are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.
When to Choose Glean
You value permissions-aware ai is genuinely differentiated - real-time enforcement across 100+ datasources addresses critical enterprise concern
Model flexibility without vendor lock-in - 15+ LLMs with per-step selection and bring-your-own-key option
Best For: Permissions-aware AI is genuinely differentiated - real-time enforcement across 100+ datasources addresses critical enterprise concern
When to Choose Stonly
You value exceptional ease of use - 4.8/5 g2 rating with intuitive visual editor praised in 32 reviews
Deep help desk integrations - bidirectional Zendesk, Salesforce, Freshdesk, ServiceNow connections
Strong compliance - SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, HIPAA, ISO 27001, PCI, CSA Star Level 1
Best For: Exceptional ease of use - 4.8/5 G2 rating with intuitive visual editor praised in 32 reviews
Migration & Switching Considerations
Switching between Glean and Stonly requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.
Pricing Comparison Summary
Glean starts at $50/month, while Stonly begins at $249/month. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.
Our Recommendation Process
Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality
For most organizations, the decision between Glean and Stonly comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.
📚 Next Steps
Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.
• Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
• Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
• Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
• Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements
Last updated: December 4, 2025 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.
The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.
DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.
People Also Compare
Explore more AI tool comparisons to find the perfect solution for your needs
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...