In this comprehensive guide, we compare Lindy.ai and Yellow.ai across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.
Overview
When choosing between Lindy.ai and Yellow.ai, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose Lindy.ai if: you value exceptional no-code usability: 4.9/5 g2 rating, 30-second setup vs 15-60 min with zapier/make
Choose Yellow.ai if: you value genuinely comprehensive 35+ channel coverage: whatsapp bsp, messenger, instagram, telegram, slack, teams, voice, sms
About Lindy.ai
Lindy.ai is ai-powered personal assistant for workflow automation. No-code AI agent platform positioning as 'AI employees' for workflow automation, NOT developer-focused RAG platform. 5,000+ integrations via Pipedream, Claude Sonnet 4.5 default, $5.1M revenue (Oct 2024), 4.9/5 G2 rating. Critical limitation: No public API or SDKs available. Founded in 2023, headquartered in San Francisco, CA, USA, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
81/100
Starting Price
Custom
About Yellow.ai
Yellow.ai is enterprise conversational ai platform with multi-llm orchestration. Enterprise conversational AI platform with embedded RAG capabilities processing 16 billion+ conversations annually. Multi-LLM orchestration across 35+ channels and 135+ languages with proprietary YellowG LLM claiming <1% hallucination rates. Founded in 2016, headquartered in San Mateo, CA, USA / Bengaluru, India, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
85/100
Starting Price
Custom
Key Differences at a Glance
In terms of user ratings, both platforms score similarly in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, pricing is comparable. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: AI Assistant versus Conversational AI. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.
⚠️ What This Comparison Covers
We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.
Detailed Feature Comparison
Lindy.ai
Yellow.ai
CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
Document Formats: PDF, DOCX, XLSX, CSV, TXT, HTML with 20MB per-file size limit
Audio Support: Full audio file support with automatic transcription included in workflow
YouTube Integration: Dedicated action for YouTube transcript extraction and processing
Website Crawling: Single page or full-site crawling with automatic link following capability
Cloud Integrations: Google Drive (including shared drives), OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint, Intercom, Freshdesk with automatic syncing
Automatic Refresh: Knowledge bases refresh every 24 hours automatically with manual 'Resync Knowledge Base' actions for immediate updates
Search Constraint: When search fuzziness drops below 100, searches limited to first 1,500 files - meaningful constraint for large enterprise deployments
Marketing vs Reality: Documentation claims 'no limit to data you can feed' but practical constraints exist around character limits and file counts
Document Cognition (DocCog) Engine: 75-85% accuracy depending on document complexity using T5 model fine-tuned on SQuAD/TriviaQA
Supported Formats: PDF, DOCX, DOC, PPTX, PPT, TXT via manual upload through platform UI only (no API upload)
Automatic Synchronization: Configurable intervals - hourly, daily, weekly for external knowledge base updates
Website Crawling: URL ingestion and sitemap.xml parsing for structured site content extraction
Missing Integrations: No Google Drive, Dropbox, or Notion support - significant gap vs competitors
YouTube Limitation: Transcript ingestion not natively supported
API Gap: No programmatic document upload or knowledge base management via API
Q&A Extraction: T5 model-based question-answer pair generation from ingested documents
Lets you ingest more than 1,400 file formats—PDF, DOCX, TXT, Markdown, HTML, and many more—via simple drag-and-drop or API.
Crawls entire sites through sitemaps and URLs, automatically indexing public help-desk articles, FAQs, and docs.
Turns multimedia into text on the fly: YouTube videos, podcasts, and other media are auto-transcribed with built-in OCR and speech-to-text.
View Transcription Guide
Connects to Google Drive, SharePoint, Notion, Confluence, HubSpot, and more through API connectors or Zapier.
See Zapier Connectors
Supports both manual uploads and auto-sync retraining, so your knowledge base always stays up to date.
Integrations & Channels
Conservative Marketing: Platform claims '200+ integrations' but actually offers 5,000+ apps via Pipedream Connect partnership
Pre-Built Actions: 2,500+ ready-to-use actions across Pipedream integration ecosystem
Messaging Platforms: Slack (full integration with triggers/actions), WhatsApp (Personal/Business APIs with templates), Microsoft Teams, Telegram, Discord, Twilio SMS
CRM Systems: Salesforce (24 actions, 8 triggers with SOQL/SOSL queries), HubSpot (deep integration for contacts/tickets/deals), Pipedrive, Zoho CRM
Productivity Tools: Notion (16 actions, 7 triggers), Airtable (full CRUD with webhooks), Google Workspace (Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Sheets, Drive complete integration)
Embedding Options: Popup chat widgets, iFrame embeds, unique public links with domain restriction capabilities
Platform Deployment: Specific instructions available for Webflow, WordPress, Squarespace, Wix, Framer implementations
Webhook Support: Inbound webhooks trigger workflows via POST requests with bearer token authentication
HTTP Actions: Call external APIs from within workflows for custom integration needs
Agent Autonomy Focus: Differentiates through autonomous operation rather than traditional chatbot conversation functionality
Multi-Lingual Support: Voice agents (Gaia) support 30+ languages, transcription covers 50+ languages, text agents operate in 85+ languages with automatic detection
Lead Capture Excellence: Real-time qualification, email/phone validation, firmographic enrichment, UTM attribution, automatic CRM syncing - claims up to 70% higher conversion vs traditional forms
Human Handoff: Configurable escalation conditions with phone agents able to transfer calls directly to human team members with full context
Conversation Memory: Tracks conversation history within and across sessions through memory feature, but differs from typical RAG retrieval - context persists through workflow execution vs vector similarity search
Hallucination Prevention: YellowG LLM claims <1% hallucination rate vs GPT-3's 22.7% in vendor benchmarks
Dynamic AI Agent: Zero-training deployment with automatic model routing and next-action determination
Multi-Intent Detection: Handles complex user queries with context-aware orchestration across conversation turns
Response Speed: 0.6-second average response time (YellowG LLM performance claim)
Automatic Guardrails: Policy compliance and response relevance filtering from deployment without manual configuration
Case Study Performance: Lulu Hypermarket 3M+ unique users in 4 weeks, Sony 21,000+ voice calls in 2 months
Custom AI Agents: Build autonomous agents powered by GPT-4 and Claude that can perform tasks independently and make real-time decisions based on business knowledge
Decision-Support Capabilities: AI agents analyze proprietary data to provide insights, recommendations, and actionable responses specific to your business domain
Multi-Agent Systems: Deploy multiple specialized AI agents that can collaborate and optimize workflows in areas like customer support, sales, and internal knowledge management
Memory & Context Management: Agents maintain conversation history and persistent context for coherent multi-turn interactions
View Agent Documentation
Tool Integration: Agents can trigger actions, integrate with external APIs via webhooks, and connect to 5,000+ apps through Zapier for automated workflows
Hyper-Accurate Responses: Leverages advanced RAG technology and retrieval mechanisms to deliver context-aware, citation-backed responses grounded in your knowledge base
Continuous Learning: Agents improve over time through automatic re-indexing of knowledge sources and integration of new data without manual retraining
Customization & Branding
Widget Customization: Display name (e.g., 'Technical Support Assistant'), accent color for brand alignment, logo/icon upload for expanded/collapsed states
Messaging Customization: Custom greeting and callout messages for initial engagement prompts
Domain Restrictions: Specify allowed deployment domains for access control and security
White-Labeling Uncertainty: Documentation doesn't explicitly confirm complete Lindy branding removal - unclear if available outside enterprise agreements
No Deep CSS Control: Limited to essential branding elements vs full CSS customization or brandless deployments on standard plans
Persona Customization: Agent-level prompts define personality, tone, and expertise areas
Settings Context: Persists across all task runs for consistent agent behavior
Per-Run Context: Allows dynamic customization per execution for adaptive responses
Memory Snippets: Learning capability saves preferences like 'Don't schedule meetings before 11am' across all sessions
RBAC Controls: Admins can lock configurations and set credit allocation limits per user or team
Visual Studio: Drag-and-drop conversation flow builder with no-code interface for business users
White-Labeling: Custom branding, domains, widget appearance on Enterprise plan
Google Gemini: Gemini 2.5 Pro, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Gemini 2.0 Flash for varied performance/cost trade-offs
Default Selection Rationale: Claude Sonnet 4.5 excels at 'navigating ambiguity in large context windows' and handling 'deeply nested data structures requiring nuanced reasoning'
Business Impact: Lindy achieved 10x customer growth after implementing Claude as default LLM
Per-Action Granularity: Users manually select models per workflow step through visual builder interface
Credit Impact: Model selection affects credit consumption - larger models (Sonnet 4.5) consume more credits than smaller models (Haiku 3.5)
No Automatic Routing: No dynamic model switching or automatic model selection based on query complexity
Manual Configuration: Each workflow action requires explicit model selection vs intelligent automatic routing
Proprietary YellowG LLM: Claims <1% hallucination rate vs GPT-3's 22.7% (vendor benchmarks), 0.6s avg response time
Komodo-7B: Indonesia-focused with 11+ regional language variants for Southeast Asian market
T5 Fine-Tuned: SQuAD/TriviaQA training for Document Cognition Q&A extraction (75-85% accuracy)
GPT Integration: GPT-3 and GPT-3.5 integrations documented in platform materials
GPT-4/Claude: Support not explicitly confirmed in documentation - unclear availability
Dynamic Model Routing: Automatic selection via Dynamic AI Agent based on query complexity and context requirements
Enterprise Tuning: Proprietary models trained on anonymized customer interactions with PII masking at data layer
Focus: Enterprise-specific tuning prioritized over raw model access and flexibility
Abstracted Selection: Model routing handled automatically - minimal user control over specific model choice
Taps into top models—OpenAI’s GPT-5.1 series, GPT-4 series, and even Anthropic’s Claude for enterprise needs (4.5 opus and sonnet, etc ).
Automatically balances cost and performance by picking the right model for each request.
Model Selection Details
Uses proprietary prompt engineering and retrieval tweaks to return high-quality, citation-backed answers.
Handles all model management behind the scenes—no extra API keys or fine-tuning steps for you.
Developer Experience ( A P I & S D Ks)
CRITICAL LIMITATION: Lindy deliberately prioritizes no-code accessibility over developer tooling - most significant gap for RAG platform comparison
NO Public REST API: Cannot manage agents, create workflows, or query knowledge base programmatically
NO GraphQL Endpoint: No alternative API architecture available for data querying
NO Official SDKs: No Python, JavaScript, Ruby, Go, or any other language SDK exists
NO OpenAPI/Swagger: No machine-readable API specification for automated client generation
NO CLI Tools: No command-line interface for automation or scripting
NO Developer Console: No API sandbox or testing environment available
Available Workarounds: Inbound webhooks (external systems trigger workflows via POST with bearer token), HTTP Request actions (call external APIs from workflows), Code Action (run Python/JavaScript in E2B sandboxes ~150ms startup), Callback URLs (bidirectional webhook communication)
Minimal GitHub Presence: github.com/lindy-ai contains only 3 repositories - build caching utility, ML engineer hiring challenge, no public SDKs or integration libraries
Documentation Quality: User-focused Lindy Academy with step-by-step tutorials, but NO API reference, code samples, or technical architecture documentation
Developer Path: For programmatic RAG control, custom retrieval pipelines, or embedding integration - Lindy offers no viable path forward
Platform-First Architecture: Designed for UI-based development with APIs serving supplementary functions (not primary access)
Available via API: User management (create/update/delete/list), event pushing for custom triggers, outbound notifications, webhook integrations
NOT Available via API: Bot/agent creation or management, document upload, knowledge base management, direct RAG query endpoints, embedding/vector store access, analytics data export
Mobile SDKs: Well-documented Android (Java), iOS (Swift), React Native, Flutter, Cordova with complete code examples, Postman collections, demo applications
Python SDK: Does not exist - major limitation for backend developers and data science teams
Web SDK: Script tag injection only (no npm package) - documentation criticized as incomplete by G2 reviewers
Rate Limits: Not publicly documented - no transparency for production capacity planning
OpenAPI Spec: Not published - no Swagger documentation for API exploration
Critical Limitation: Cannot use Yellow.ai as RAG backend - queries must flow through platform conversation flows vs direct API calls
Ships a well-documented REST API for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data, and querying chat.
API Documentation
Dynamic Routing: Automatic model selection and next-action determination via Dynamic AI Agent
Multi-Intent Detection: Context-aware handling of complex queries spanning multiple domains
Regional Data Storage: Customer-selected data residency across 6 regions for compliance and latency optimization
Limitation: No embedding customization, vector store access, or retrieval parameter tuning exposed to users
Closed Architecture: RAG embedded within platform - cannot customize or access underlying retrieval mechanisms
N/A
Pricing & Scalability
Free Plan: $0/month, 400 credits, 1M character knowledge base, basic automations with 100+ integrations
Pro Plan: $49.99/month, 5,000 credits, 20M character knowledge base, phone calls, full integrations, Lindy branding on embed
Business Plans: $199.99-$299.99/month, 20,000-30,000 credits, 50M character knowledge base, custom branding, 30+ languages, unlimited calls
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing with SSO, SCIM provisioning, dedicated support, custom training
Additional Costs: Phone calls $0.19/minute (GPT-4o), team members $19.99/member/month (Pro/Business), custom automation building $500 one-time, credits $19-$1,199/month (10,000-1,000,000 credits)
Credit Consumption: Varies by model choice and complexity - larger models (Claude Sonnet 4.5) consume more credits than smaller models
Primary User Complaint: Unpredictable costs - credit depletion speed consistently frustrating in reviews, particularly for complex workflows with premium actions
Pricing Transparency Issue: Credit system creates forecasting difficulty vs fixed per-seat or usage-based pricing
Scalability: Character limits constrain large knowledge bases - 50M character cap on Business tier may limit enterprise deployments
Enterprise Scale: 16 billion+ conversations annually validates ability to handle massive production workloads
Case Study Scale: Lulu Hypermarket 3M+ users in 4 weeks, Sony 21,000+ calls in 2 months demonstrate scalability
Entry Barrier: ~$10K minimum annual spend limits accessibility for small businesses and startups
Runs on straightforward subscriptions: Standard (~$99/mo), Premium (~$449/mo), and customizable Enterprise plans.
Gives generous limits—Standard covers up to 60 million words per bot, Premium up to 300 million—all at flat monthly rates.
View Pricing
Handles scaling for you: the managed cloud infra auto-scales with demand, keeping things fast and available.
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 Type II: Certified by Johanson Group audit - independently validated security controls
HIPAA Compliant: Business Associate Agreement (BAA) available for healthcare deployments
GDPR Compliant: EU data protection and privacy rights compliance
PIPEDA Compliant: Canadian Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act
CCPA Compliant: California Consumer Privacy Act compliance
No AI Training: Customer data NEVER used for AI model training - explicitly stated in privacy policy
Encryption: AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.2+ in transit for comprehensive data protection
Infrastructure: Google Cloud Platform hosting with multi-zone redundancy for high availability
Backups: Daily encrypted backups with secure key management
Access Controls: RBAC (Role-Based Access Control), MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication), Enterprise SSO via existing identity providers, SCIM provisioning for automated user lifecycle
Audit Logs: Track agent activity, data access, configuration changes - available on Business/Enterprise plans
Data Residency Limitation: US-based only - no explicit EU data residency option documented (enterprise inquiries required for region-specific deployments)
No ISO 27001: Information security management certification not documented
SOC 2 Type II: Independently audited security controls and compliance certification
ISO Certifications: ISO 27001 (Information Security), ISO 27018 (Cloud Privacy), ISO 27701 (Privacy Management)
HIPAA Compliant: Suitable for healthcare use cases requiring protected health information handling
GDPR Compliant: Data protection and privacy rights for European users
PCI DSS Certified: Payment card industry data security standard compliance for financial transactions
FedRAMP Authorized: Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program for US government deployments
Encryption: AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.3 in transit for maximum data protection
Regional Data Centers: US, EU, Singapore, India, Indonesia, UAE with customer-selected data residency
SSO/SAML: Integration with Google, Microsoft, Azure AD, LDAP for enterprise identity management
RBAC: Six permission levels for granular access control across teams
IP Whitelisting: Network-level access restrictions for enhanced security
Audit Logs: 15-day retention for API activity tracking and compliance reporting
On-Premise Options: Private cloud and on-premise deployment for complete data sovereignty
Error Tracking: Built-in retry mechanisms with detailed failure monitoring and debugging
Trigger History: Task completion logs track every workflow execution and result
Qualification Metrics: Lead conversion rates and response time tracking for sales/marketing workflows
Completion Rates: Workflow success measurement and handling time analysis
Weekly Digests: Automated email summaries of task usage delivered to administrators
Agent Evals: Benchmarking feature against quality standards with regression prevention
Log Retention: 1 day (Free tier - severely constrains troubleshooting) to 30+ days (Enterprise tier)
Audit Logs: User actions, data access, configuration changes tracked on Business/Enterprise plans
Export Capabilities: Available but SIEM integration specifics require sales confirmation
No RAG-Specific Metrics: Cannot track retrieval precision, recall, embedding quality, or vector similarity scores
Workflow-Centric: Focuses on output quality rather than retrieval precision - notable gap for RAG-specific monitoring vs platforms like LangSmith or Arize
Analytics Dashboard: Comprehensive conversation metrics, user engagement tracking across 35+ channels
Deflection Metrics: Automation success rates and ticket deflection measurement
Voice Analytics: IVR and telephony integration performance tracking
Audit Logs: 15-day retention for API activity with compliance reporting capabilities
Case Study Benchmarks: Lulu Hypermarket 3M+ unique users in 4 weeks, Sony 21,000+ calls in 2 months
Market Differentiation: Computer Use capability unique among no-code automation platforms - significant competitive advantage
N/A
N/A
Additional Considerations
Best Use Cases: Operations teams automating repetitive workflows without developer resources - lead qualification, email triage, meeting scheduling, CRM updates, customer support routing excel
Primary Strength: Zero-training deployment with Agent Builder ('vibe coding') creates sophisticated automations in 30 seconds vs 15-60 minutes with Zapier/Make for equivalent workflows
Unique Capabilities: Autopilot (Computer Use) enables automations impossible through traditional integrations - can interact with any web-based application without published APIs through AI-powered browser control
Multi-Agent Societies: Multiple specialized Lindies collaborate on complex tasks through delegation rules - Sales (SDR → AE → CS), Support (Triage → Technical → Escalation), Research with specialized investigators
Credit-Based Pricing Reality: Most common user complaint is unpredictable costs - 'credits consumed quickly and unpredictably' makes budget forecasting difficult vs fixed per-seat or usage-based pricing in competitors
Enterprise Limitations: Character limits (50M cap on Business tier) may constrain large deployments, US-only data residency blocks EU customers with strict localization requirements, no ISO 27001 certification may limit procurement
Developer Friction: Deliberately prioritizes no-code accessibility over developer tooling - NO public REST API, NO SDKs, NO CLI tools, NO programmatic RAG control makes it unsuitable for API-first use cases
Support Inconsistency: User reviews note 'inconsistent responsiveness on lower tiers' and 'writing to support twice with no response' - support quality varies significantly by plan tier
Platform Comparison Warning: Fundamentally different architecture from RAG-as-a-Service platforms - comparing Lindy to CustomGPT is misleading as they serve different product categories (workflow automation vs knowledge retrieval)
Platform Classification: ENTERPRISE CONVERSATIONAL AI PLATFORM with RAG capabilities, NOT a pure RAG-as-a-Service API platform - emphasis on multi-channel automation and workflow orchestration
Target Audience: Mid-market to enterprise organizations (1,000+ employees) with complex conversational workflows vs individual developers or SMBs requiring simple knowledge retrieval
Primary Strength: Exceptional for enterprise-grade conversational AI across 35+ channels (WhatsApp, voice, web, social) with 150+ language support and 60%+ automation rates in regulated industries
Vertical Expertise: 50% customer concentration in financial services with deep BFSI (Banking, Financial Services, Insurance) domain knowledge and compliance capabilities (PCI DSS, SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA)
Voice AI Excellence: Real-time voice agents in 50+ languages with sentiment analysis, IVR integration, call center deflection capabilities differentiate from text-only RAG platforms
CRITICAL LIMITATION - Enterprise Sales Motion: Custom pricing requires sales engagement (2-6 week cycle) with no self-serve option - unsuitable for quick testing or developer experimentation
CRITICAL LIMITATION - Pricing Opacity: No published pricing, user reviews report costs 'much higher than competitors', estimated $1,500-$3,500/month minimum vs $99-$299 in RAG platforms
CRITICAL LIMITATION - Implementation Complexity: 8-12 week implementation timelines common with mandatory professional services vs instant deployment in self-serve platforms
Developer API Limitations: APIs oriented toward conversation orchestration vs programmatic RAG operations (semantic search, embedding controls, retrieval configuration)
Lock-In Concerns: Heavy professional services dependency and complex multi-system integrations create significant switching costs vs API-first RAG platforms
Use Case Mismatch: Exceptional for large-scale enterprise conversational AI deployments across multiple channels; inappropriate for simple document Q&A or developer-centric RAG use cases
Slashes engineering overhead with an all-in-one RAG platform—no in-house ML team required.
Gets you to value quickly: launch a functional AI assistant in minutes.
Stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements, so you’re always on the latest tech.
Balances top-tier accuracy with ease of use, perfect for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects.
Core Chatbot Features
Chatbot vs Agent Philosophy: Lindy differentiates through autonomous agent operation rather than traditional chatbot conversation - emphasizes task execution over conversational interaction
Multi-Lingual Voice Agents (Gaia): 30+ language support for voice agents, transcription covers 50+ languages, text agents operate in 85+ languages with automatic detection - no manual language configuration required
Lead Capture Excellence: Real-time qualification with email/phone validation, firmographic enrichment, UTM attribution tracking, automatic CRM syncing - claims up to 70% higher conversion vs traditional forms
Human Handoff Logic: Configurable escalation conditions with phone agents able to transfer calls directly to human team members with full conversation context and history preservation
Conversation Memory System: Tracks conversation history within and across sessions through memory feature - context persists through workflow execution vs vector similarity search in traditional RAG systems
Analytics & Performance Tracking: Qualification rates, response times, completion rates, handling times monitored comprehensively with weekly automated email summaries of task usage and agent performance
Agent Evals Feature: Dedicated benchmarking system for measuring agent performance against quality standards and preventing regression over time with automated quality monitoring
Workflow-Centric Design: Emphasizes autonomous task execution over conversational chatbot patterns - structured workflows with 'agents on rails' philosophy constraining LLM behavior through predefined steps
Hallucination Prevention: Architectural constraints vs retrieval optimization - 'poor man's RLHF' with human confirmation before action execution prevents costly mistakes
Learning Integration: Corrections from user feedback embedded in vector storage for future retrieval improvement - system learns from mistakes through Memory Snippets saving preferences like scheduling constraints
Multi-Turn Conversations: Super Agent maintains conversation context across turns with intent detection, entity extraction, slot filling, and dialogue state management
150+ Language Support: Automatic language detection with native multilingual processing across all 150+ supported languages reducing accuracy loss vs translation-based systems
Human Handoff: Configurable escalation triggers with full conversation history transfer, agent workload balancing, queue management, and SLA tracking
Analytics & Insights: Comprehensive dashboards with containment rates, CSAT scores, conversation flows, drop-off points, user journey analytics, and business KPI tracking
Agent Performance Monitoring: Bot accuracy scoring, user satisfaction metrics, conversation success rates, A/B testing capabilities for continuous improvement
Voice AI Capabilities: Real-time voice agents in 50+ languages with sentiment analysis during calls, IVR integration, call deflection, automated transcription
Lead Capture & Qualification: Real-time lead scoring, CRM integration (Salesforce, HubSpot, Zoho), automatic contact creation, lead routing based on firmographics
Safety & Conduct Controls: Configurable filters ensuring ethical communication, avoiding harmful topics, handling sensitive data responsibly with compliance guardrails
Conversational Behavior Rules: Define conversation rules guiding agent responses in different situations ensuring consistent interactions across channels and use cases
Reduces hallucinations by grounding replies in your data and adding source citations for transparency.
Benchmark Details
Handles multi-turn, context-aware chats with persistent history and solid conversation management.
Speaks 90+ languages, making global rollouts straightforward.
Includes extras like lead capture (email collection) and smooth handoff to a human when needed.
Behavior Customization Layers: Settings Context (agent-level configuration persisting across all task runs), Per-Run Context (dynamic customization per execution for adaptive responses), Memory Snippets (learning preferences saved across sessions)
Workflow Flexibility: Visual builder allows business users to modify agent logic without coding - drag-and-drop interface for conversation flows, conditional logic, API integrations, data transformations
Agent Personality Configuration: Configurable tone, expertise areas, communication style through prompt configuration - define professional vs casual voice, technical depth, response verbosity
Knowledge Base Management: Automatic refresh every 24 hours for all connected cloud sources (Google Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint, Intercom, Freshdesk) with manual 'Resync Knowledge Base' actions for immediate updates
Search Fuzziness Controls: Configurable slider (0-100 scale) balancing semantic vs keyword search - at 100 (pure semantic) no file limit, lower values add keyword matching but constrain to 1,500 files
Retrieval Configuration: Default 4 search results returned (adjustable up to 10 maximum) with hybrid search combining semantic similarity and keyword matching for precision
RBAC Controls: Admins can lock configurations and set credit allocation limits per user or team - prevents unauthorized changes and controls spending across organization
CRITICAL LIMITATION - No Embedding Control: Cannot customize embedding models, vector similarity thresholds, or retrieval parameters - black-box RAG implementation prevents optimization of retrieval pipeline
Developer Flexibility Gap: No programmatic access to knowledge base management, no API for document upload or retrieval configuration, no ability to tune vector search parameters or chunking strategies
Agent Profile & Persona: Configure name, role, scope, tone (formal/friendly/witty), communication style, expertise areas defining core agent identity
Conversation Rules: Define custom rules guiding agent behavior in specific situations ensuring consistent interactions and brand voice compliance
Welcome Messages & Greetings: Personalized welcome messages for different channels, user segments, and conversation contexts with dynamic variable substitution
Fallback Behaviors: Configurable responses for knowledge gaps, API failures, validation errors, low-confidence scenarios with escalation path options
Multi-KB Support: Multiple knowledge bases per organization with role-based access, departmental segregation, and cross-KB search capabilities
Auto-Reindexing: Automatic knowledge base refresh when source content changes in connected systems ensuring always-current information
Dynamic Prompt Engineering: Custom system prompts, temperature controls, response length limits, creativity settings configurable per use case
Channel-Specific Customization: Different agent behaviors, response formats, media handling per channel (WhatsApp, voice, web, email)
CRITICAL LIMITATION - Opaque RAG Implementation: Retrieval mechanisms, embedding models, chunking strategies, similarity thresholds not exposed for developer configuration
CRITICAL LIMITATION - NO Programmatic Knowledge API: Knowledge base management requires UI interaction - no API for document upload, embedding updates, or retrieval tuning
Lets you add, remove, or tweak content on the fly—automatic re-indexing keeps everything current.
Shapes agent behavior through system prompts and sample Q&A, ensuring a consistent voice and focus.
Learn How to Update Sources
Supports multiple agents per account, so different teams can have their own bots.
Balances hands-on control with smart defaults—no deep ML expertise required to get tailored behavior.
Multi- Agent Collaboration
Societies of Lindies: Multiple specialized agents collaborate on complex tasks through delegation rules
Agent Specialization: Each Lindy can have unique expertise, knowledge base access, and capabilities
Delegation Rules: Define when and how agents hand off tasks to specialized team members
Workflow Orchestration: Coordinate multi-step processes across different agent specializations
Context Preservation: Full conversation and task history passed between collaborating agents
Use Cases: Sales (SDR → Account Executive → Customer Success), Support (Triage → Technical → Escalation), Complex research with specialized investigators
Learning Across Agents: Feedback and corrections shared across agent society for collective improvement
Sophisticated Workflows: Enable enterprise-grade automation previously requiring human coordination
Agent Builder Integration: Natural language creation of multi-agent systems vs manual workflow mapping
N/A
N/A
Lead Capture & Conversion
Real-Time Qualification: AI evaluates lead quality during initial conversation vs post-submission scoring
Email/Phone Validation: Automatic verification prevents fake submissions and improves data quality
Firmographic Enrichment: Company data appended to leads automatically (size, industry, revenue, etc.)
UTM Attribution: Marketing source tracking preserved through entire lead journey
Automatic CRM Syncing: Qualified leads flow directly to Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho without manual data entry
Conversion Claims: Up to 70% higher conversion vs traditional forms (vendor claim - not independently validated)
Conversational Forms: Natural dialogue collection vs static form fields improves completion rates
Routing Logic: Automatically assign leads to appropriate sales reps based on territory, product interest, company size
Follow-Up Automation: Trigger email sequences, meeting scheduling, nurture campaigns based on qualification results
N/A
N/A
R A G-as-a- Service Assessment
Platform Type: NOT A RAG-AS-A-SERVICE PLATFORM - No-code AI agent/workflow automation platform targeting business users vs developers
Critical Distinction: Lindy prioritizes business user accessibility over programmatic RAG control - fundamentally different design philosophy
RAG Implementation: Black-box hybrid search (semantic + keyword) with configurable fuzziness but no exposed retrieval controls
Vector Database: Undisclosed - no documentation of Pinecone, Chroma, Qdrant, or specific vector store
Embedding Models: Undocumented - no information about which models power semantic search
API Availability: NO public REST API, GraphQL endpoint, or official SDKs for programmatic access
Developer Tools: NO OpenAPI spec, CLI tools, developer console, API sandbox, or technical documentation
Benchmarks: No published RAG accuracy, latency, or performance metrics available
Target Audience: Operations teams automating workflows vs developers building custom RAG applications
Use Case Mismatch: Comparing Lindy to CustomGPT.ai is architecturally misleading - fundamentally different product categories serving different user personas
Platform Type: NOT A RAG-AS-A-SERVICE PLATFORM - Full-stack enterprise conversational AI with embedded RAG
Critical Distinction: RAG functions as embedded feature, not exposed API service - cannot use Yellow.ai purely as knowledge/RAG backend
Document Cognition: 75-85% accuracy with T5 model fine-tuned on SQuAD/TriviaQA for Q&A extraction
Knowledge Architecture: Closed system - no direct RAG query endpoints, embedding access, or vector store API
API Limitations: No programmatic document upload, knowledge base management, or direct retrieval capabilities
Query Flow: Queries must flow through platform conversation flows vs direct API calls to knowledge backend
Core Architecture: Serverless RAG infrastructure with automatic embedding generation, vector search optimization, and LLM orchestration fully managed behind API endpoints
API-First Design: Comprehensive REST API with well-documented endpoints for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data (1,400+ formats), and querying chat
API Documentation
Developer Experience: Open-source Python SDK (customgpt-client), Postman collections, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, and extensive cookbooks for rapid integration
No-Code Alternative: Wizard-style web dashboard enables non-developers to upload content, brand widgets, and deploy chatbots without touching code
Hybrid Target Market: Serves both developer teams wanting robust APIs AND business users seeking no-code RAG deployment - unique positioning vs pure API platforms (Cohere) or pure no-code tools (Jotform)
RAG Technology Leadership: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, proprietary anti-hallucination mechanisms, and citation-backed responses
Benchmark Details
Deployment Flexibility: Cloud-hosted SaaS with auto-scaling, API integrations, embedded chat widgets, ChatGPT Plugin support, and hosted MCP Server for Claude/Cursor/ChatGPT
Enterprise Readiness: SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling, domain allowlisting, RBAC with 2FA/SSO, and flat-rate pricing without per-query charges
Use Case Fit: Ideal for organizations needing both rapid no-code deployment AND robust API capabilities, teams handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), and businesses requiring production-ready RAG without building ML infrastructure from scratch
Competitive Positioning: Bridges the gap between developer-first platforms (Cohere, Deepset) requiring heavy coding and no-code chatbot builders (Jotform, Kommunicate) lacking API depth - offers best of both worlds
Competitive Positioning
Primary Advantage: Exceptional no-code usability (4.9/5 G2) with 5,000+ integrations via Pipedream and Autopilot (Computer Use) unique capabilities
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Default: Best-in-class language understanding driving 10x customer growth - 'almost no one overrides' per Anthropic
Multi-Agent Sophistication: Societies of Lindies enable complex task delegation impossible with single-bot platforms
Strong Compliance: SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA with BAA, GDPR, PIPEDA, CCPA enables regulated industry adoption
Financial Validation: $5.1M revenue (Oct 2024), $50M+ funding from Menlo Ventures, Battery Ventures, Coatue validates market fit
Setup Speed: 30 seconds vs 15-60 minutes with Zapier/Make - dramatic productivity advantage for business users
Primary Challenge: NOT a developer-focused RAG platform - no API, no SDKs, opaque RAG implementation blocks technical evaluation
Pricing Unpredictability: Credit-based model most common user complaint - costs difficult to forecast vs fixed tiers
Data Residency Limitation: US-only hosting blocks EU customers with strict data localization requirements
Market Position: Competes with Zapier, Make, n8n for workflow automation budget vs RAG API platforms (CustomGPT.ai, Pinecone Assistant)
Use Case Fit: Exceptional for business users automating workflows without developers; poor fit for developers requiring programmatic RAG capabilities
Comparison Warning: Direct feature comparison with RAG-as-a-Service platforms is misleading - different product categories, target audiences, and value propositions
Primary Advantage: Complete enterprise conversational AI platform with unmatched 35+ channel coverage and 135+ language support
Compliance Leadership: SOC 2, ISO 27001/27018/27701, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, FedRAMP exceeds most AI platform competitors
Proprietary Innovation: YellowG LLM claims <1% hallucination rate, Komodo-7B for Indonesia, 0.6s response times (vendor benchmarks)
Proven Scale: 16 billion+ conversations annually, customers include Sony, Domino's, Hyundai, Volkswagen across 85+ countries
Regional Strength: Multi-region data centers (US, EU, Singapore, India, Indonesia, UAE) with Komodo-7B for Southeast Asia
Primary Challenge: NOT a RAG-as-a-Service platform - embedded RAG within closed conversational system blocks API-first use cases
Developer Friction: No Python SDK, no knowledge base API, no dedicated RAG endpoints, web SDK documentation gaps
Pricing Barrier: ~$10K-$25K annual minimum with 4-month implementation vs competitors with sub-$100/month self-service tiers
Learning Curve: G2 reviews cite steep complexity - "setup felt akin to solving a Rubik's cube blindfolded"
Market Position: Competes with enterprise CX platforms (Genesys, Twilio, LivePerson) vs RAG API services (CustomGPT.ai, Pinecone Assistant)
Use Case Fit: Exceptional for enterprises needing omnichannel CX automation at scale; poor fit for developers seeking programmable RAG capabilities
Architectural Mismatch: Platform-first vs API-first design makes direct RAG platform comparison fundamentally misleading
Market position: Leading all-in-one RAG platform balancing enterprise-grade accuracy with developer-friendly APIs and no-code usability for rapid deployment
Target customers: Mid-market to enterprise organizations needing production-ready AI assistants, development teams wanting robust APIs without building RAG infrastructure, and businesses requiring 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription (YouTube, podcasts)
Key competitors: OpenAI Assistants API, Botsonic, Chatbase.co, Azure AI, and custom RAG implementations using LangChain
Competitive advantages: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling included, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, hosted MCP Server support (Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT), generous data limits (60M words Standard, 300M Premium), and flat monthly pricing without per-query charges
Pricing advantage: Transparent flat-rate pricing at $99/month (Standard) and $449/month (Premium) with generous included limits; no hidden costs for API access, branding removal, or basic features; best value for teams needing both no-code dashboard and developer APIs in one platform
Use case fit: Ideal for businesses needing both rapid no-code deployment and robust API capabilities, organizations handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), teams requiring white-label chatbots with source citations for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects, and companies wanting all-in-one RAG without managing ML infrastructure
A I Models
Default Model - Claude Sonnet 4.5: Primary LLM 'almost no one overrides' according to Anthropic case study - excels at navigating ambiguity in large context windows
Anthropic Claude Family: Sonnet 4.5 (default, best performance), Sonnet 3.7 (balanced), Haiku 3.5 (fast, cost-effective) with 200K token context windows
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Rationale: Selected for 'navigating ambiguity in large context windows' and handling 'deeply nested data structures requiring nuanced reasoning'
Business Impact: Lindy achieved 10x customer growth after implementing Claude as default LLM - significant competitive advantage
Model Switching: Each workflow action requires explicit model selection - no automatic routing based on query complexity or cost optimization
No Dynamic Model Routing: Cannot intelligently switch between models based on task requirements - manual configuration only vs AI-powered model selection
Limited Model Experimentation: No A/B testing capabilities or automatic model performance comparison across different LLMs
Proprietary YellowG LLM: Custom-trained model with vendor-claimed <1% hallucination rate vs GPT-3's 22.7%, 0.6-second average response time
Komodo-7B: Specialized Indonesia-focused model supporting 11+ regional language variants for Southeast Asian market dominance
Orchestrator LLM: Context switching and multi-intent detection engine with zero-training deployment capability
T5 Fine-Tuned: SQuAD/TriviaQA trained model for Document Cognition with 75-85% accuracy depending on complexity
GPT-3 & GPT-3.5: Integration documented for supplemental processing and model routing
15+ LLM Models: Multi-model architecture combining proprietary and third-party models for optimal task routing
Dynamic Model Routing: Automatic selection based on query complexity, language requirements, and performance optimization
Note: GPT-4/Claude support not explicitly confirmed - availability unclear in documentation
Enterprise Training: Models trained on 16 billion+ anonymized customer conversations with PII masking at data layer
Limited Flexibility: Users cannot manually select models - system handles routing automatically without direct control
Primary models: GPT-5.1 and 4 series from OpenAI, and Anthropic's Claude 4.5 (opus and sonnet) for enterprise needs
Automatic model selection: Balances cost and performance by automatically selecting the appropriate model for each request
Model Selection Details
Proprietary optimizations: Custom prompt engineering and retrieval enhancements for high-quality, citation-backed answers
Managed infrastructure: All model management handled behind the scenes - no API keys or fine-tuning required from users
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms ensure chatbot only answers based on provided content, improving trust and factual accuracy
Search Fuzziness: 100 = pure semantic search (no file limit), lower values add keyword matching but limit to first 1,500 files - trade-off between precision and scale
Default Retrieval: 4 search results returned per query (adjustable up to 10 maximum) for context-aware responses
Document Processing: PDF, DOCX, XLSX, CSV, TXT, HTML with 20MB per-file size limit and automatic text extraction
Audio & Video: Full audio file support with automatic transcription, YouTube transcript extraction via dedicated action
Website Crawling: Single page or full-site crawling with automatic link following and sitemap discovery
Cloud Integration: Google Drive (shared drives), OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint, Intercom, Freshdesk with automatic 24-hour sync
Manual Refresh: 'Resync Knowledge Base' actions for immediate updates when 24-hour sync insufficient
Vector Database: NOT disclosed - no documentation mentions Pinecone, Chroma, Qdrant, or proprietary implementation
Embedding Models: Undocumented - no information about which embedding models power semantic search or customization options
Chunking Strategy: Not configurable - automatic text segmentation with undisclosed chunk size and overlap parameters
Hallucination Reduction: 'Agents on rails' philosophy constrains LLM behavior through predefined workflow steps - architectural constraints vs retrieval optimization
Learning Integration: Human feedback corrections embedded in vector storage for future retrieval improvement
CRITICAL LIMITATION - Black Box Implementation: RAG treated as opaque system - no transparency into vector similarity scores, embedding quality, retrieval mechanisms
CRITICAL LIMITATION - No Published Benchmarks: No RAG accuracy metrics, retrieval precision/recall scores, or latency measurements available
CRITICAL LIMITATION - No Developer Control: Cannot customize embedding models, similarity thresholds, reranking, or retrieval parameters
Enterprise Concern: Opacity may concern organizations requiring transparency into AI decision-making for compliance auditing or regulatory requirements
Agentic RAG Architecture: Multi-checkpoint validation combining intelligent retrieval with reasoning and action - Yellow.ai's AI Agents don't just retrieve, they think, act, and learn
Document Cognition (DocCog): T5 model-based Q&A extraction with 75-85% accuracy depending on document complexity
Hallucination Prevention: Proprietary YellowG LLM approach with vendor-claimed <1% rate vs industry averages through training optimization
Automatic Guardrails: Policy compliance and response filtering from deployment without manual configuration requirements
Knowledge Synchronization: Configurable intervals (hourly, daily, weekly) for external sources including Salesforce, ServiceNow, Confluence, SharePoint
Website Crawling: URL ingestion and sitemap.xml parsing for structured site content extraction and Q&A generation
Enterprise Integrations: Bi-directional sync with AWS S3, Prismic, and major enterprise knowledge bases
Note: Closed Architecture: RAG embedded within platform - no direct endpoints, embedding customization, or vector store API access for developers
Note: No API Upload: Document upload requires manual platform UI interaction - cannot programmatically manage knowledge base
Core architecture: GPT-4 combined with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology, outperforming OpenAI in RAG benchmarks
RAG Performance
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms reduce hallucinations and ensure responses are grounded in provided content
Benchmark Details
Automatic citations: Each response includes clickable citations pointing to original source documents for transparency and verification
Optimized pipeline: Efficient vector search, smart chunking, and caching for sub-second reply times
Scalability: Maintains speed and accuracy for massive knowledge bases with tens of millions of words
Context-aware conversations: Multi-turn conversations with persistent history and comprehensive conversation management
Source verification: Always cites sources so users can verify facts on the spot
Use Cases
Primary Use Case: No-code workflow automation for operations teams, sales teams, marketing teams requiring AI-powered task execution without developers
Sales Automation: Lead qualification with real-time scoring, email/phone validation, firmographic enrichment, CRM syncing (Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive)
Customer Support: Email triage, ticket routing, FAQ responses, escalation workflows with human handoff and context transfer
Healthcare: Patient appointment scheduling, medical record processing (HIPAA-compliant), insurance verification, billing automation
Legal: Document review, contract analysis, case research, deadline tracking with confidentiality controls
Voice Agents (Gaia): Phone call automation with 30+ language support, call transcription in 50+ languages, call transfer to humans
Team Sizes: Individual contributors to enterprise teams (1-500+ users) - scales from solopreneurs to Fortune 500 companies
Industries: Technology, professional services, healthcare, legal, financial services, e-commerce, real estate - any industry with repetitive workflows
Implementation Speed: 30 seconds with Agent Builder ('vibe coding') vs 15-60 minutes with Zapier/Make - fastest setup in automation category
NOT Ideal For: Developers needing programmatic RAG APIs, custom retrieval pipeline tuning, embedding model experimentation, transparent RAG implementation details, organizations requiring EU data residency
Customer Service Automation: 90% query automation across 35+ channels with 60% operational cost reduction - handles 16 billion+ conversations annually
Employee Experience (EX): IT support automation (password resets, hardware requests), HR policy FAQs, leave applications, pay slip access, conference room bookings with rapid response delivery even in low bandwidth environments
24/7 Support Operations: Minimal human involvement for routine queries, autonomous account issue resolution, transaction execution, multi-department coordination with full context preservation
E-commerce & Retail: Personal shopping assistance (inventory browsing, price comparison, order placement, returns handling), real-time transaction monitoring with suspicious activity blocking
Travel & Hospitality: Booking management for travel, hotels, restaurants with automatic rebooking during disruptions and 24/7 availability
Financial Services: Fraud detection workflows with automated investigation initiation and PCI DSS compliance for payment transactions
Healthcare: HIPAA-compliant patient engagement and support with protected health information handling capabilities
Government & Federal: FedRAMP authorized platform for US federal deployments with complete compliance and security requirements
Real-World Results: Lulu Hypermarket 3M+ unique users in 4 weeks, Sony 21,000+ voice calls in 2 months, Lion Parcel 85% automation rate, AirAsia employee experience transformation
Enterprise Scale: Customers include Sony, Domino's, Hyundai, Volkswagen, Ferrellgas across 85+ countries with billion+ conversation processing
Customer support automation: AI assistants handling common queries, reducing support ticket volume, providing 24/7 instant responses with source citations
Internal knowledge management: Employee self-service for HR policies, technical documentation, onboarding materials, company procedures across 1,400+ file formats
Sales enablement: Product information chatbots, lead qualification, customer education with white-labeled widgets on websites and apps
Documentation assistance: Technical docs, help centers, FAQs with automatic website crawling and sitemap indexing
Educational platforms: Course materials, research assistance, student support with multimedia content (YouTube transcriptions, podcasts)
Healthcare information: Patient education, medical knowledge bases (SOC 2 Type II compliant for sensitive data)
E-commerce: Product recommendations, order assistance, customer inquiries with API integration to 5,000+ apps via Zapier
SaaS onboarding: User guides, feature explanations, troubleshooting with multi-agent support for different teams
Security & Compliance
SOC 2 Type II Certified: Independently audited by Johanson Group validating security controls for data protection, availability, processing integrity
HIPAA Compliant: Business Associate Agreement (BAA) available for healthcare organizations handling Protected Health Information (PHI)
GDPR Compliant: EU General Data Protection Regulation compliance with data processing agreements, right to deletion, consent management
PIPEDA Compliant: Canadian Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act for Canadian customer data
CCPA Compliant: California Consumer Privacy Act compliance for California residents with data access/deletion rights
No AI Training on Customer Data: Explicitly stated in privacy policy - customer data NEVER used for AI model training or improvement
Encryption Standards: AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.2+ in transit for comprehensive data protection across all storage and transmission
Infrastructure: Google Cloud Platform hosting with multi-zone redundancy for 99.9%+ uptime and disaster recovery
Daily Backups: Encrypted backups with secure key management and point-in-time recovery capabilities
Access Controls: RBAC (Role-Based Access Control), MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication), audit logs tracking agent activity and data access
Enterprise SSO: Single Sign-On via existing identity providers (Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace) for centralized authentication
SCIM Provisioning: Automated user lifecycle management with automatic provisioning/deprovisioning for enterprise security
Admin Controls: Lock configurations, set credit allocation limits per user/team, monitor usage for cost control and security
Audit Logs: Track agent activity, data access, configuration changes on Business/Enterprise plans for compliance and security monitoring
Log Retention: 1 day (Free - severely limits troubleshooting), 7-30 days (Pro/Business), 30+ days (Enterprise with custom retention)
LIMITATION - No ISO 27001: Information Security Management System certification not documented - may limit enterprise procurement
LIMITATION - US Data Residency Only: No explicit EU data residency option documented - enterprise inquiries required for region-specific deployments
LIMITATION - Free Tier Log Retention: 1 day severely constrains security incident investigation and compliance auditing vs 30+ day industry standard
SOC 2 Type II: Independently audited security controls and compliance certification with annual penetration testing validation
ISO Certifications: ISO 27001 (Information Security Management), ISO 27018 (Cloud Privacy Controls), ISO 27701 (Privacy Information Management)
HIPAA Compliant: Healthcare industry ready for protected health information (PHI) handling with Business Associate Agreement support
GDPR Compliant: European data protection and privacy rights with regional data centers in EU for data residency requirements
PCI DSS Certified: Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard Level 1 compliance for financial transaction security
FedRAMP Authorized: Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program certification for US government cloud deployments
Encryption Standards: AES-256 encryption at rest, TLS 1.3 for data in transit exceeding industry baseline requirements
Regional Data Centers: 6 global regions (US, EU, Singapore, India, Indonesia, UAE) with customer-selected data residency for compliance and latency optimization
Enterprise Identity Management: SSO/SAML integration with Google, Microsoft, Azure AD, LDAP for unified access control
RBAC Controls: Six permission levels for granular team access control with IP whitelisting for network-level security
Audit Logs: 15-day API activity retention for compliance reporting and security monitoring
On-Premise Options: Private cloud and complete on-premise deployment available for air-gapped environments and complete data sovereignty
AI Training Privacy: Models trained on anonymized customer interactions with PII masking at data layer before processing
Basic Plan (AWS Marketplace): ~$10,000/year minimum for single use case implementation with limited channel access
Standard Plan: ~$25,000/year for up to 4 use cases with expanded capabilities and additional channels
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing requiring sales engagement - unlimited bots, channels, integrations with dedicated support and SLA guarantees
Implementation Timeline: Typically 4 months from contract to full deployment with professional services included (G2 user data)
Additional Costs: Voice AI features and advanced generative AI capabilities incur separate charges beyond base platform subscription
Sales-Led Process: All paid plans beyond free tier require sales contact - no self-service purchasing or transparent public pricing
Payment Terms: Annual contracts standard for commercial plans with monthly billing unavailable for most tiers
Entry Barrier: $10K minimum annual spend creates significant barrier for small businesses, startups, and individual developers
On-Premise Pricing: Custom enterprise pricing for private cloud and on-premise deployments with additional implementation costs
Regional Variations: Pricing may vary by selected data center region and compliance requirements
Scale Justification: 16 billion+ conversations annually and enterprise customer base (Sony, Domino's, Hyundai) validates high-end positioning
Standard Plan: $99/month or $89/month annual - 10 custom chatbots, 5,000 items per chatbot, 60 million words per bot, basic helpdesk support, standard security
View Pricing
Premium Plan: $499/month or $449/month annual - 100 custom chatbots, 20,000 items per chatbot, 300 million words per bot, advanced support, enhanced security, additional customization
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing - Comprehensive AI solutions, highest security and compliance, dedicated account managers, custom SSO, token authentication, priority support with faster SLAs
Enterprise Solutions
7-Day Free Trial: Full access to Standard features without charges - available to all users
Annual billing discount: Save 10% by paying upfront annually ($89/mo Standard, $449/mo Premium)
Flat monthly rates: No per-query charges, no hidden costs for API access or white-labeling (included in all plans)
Managed infrastructure: Auto-scaling cloud infrastructure included - no additional hosting or scaling fees
Support & Documentation
Email Support: support@lindy.ai (general), security@lindy.ai (security issues), privacy@lindy.ai (privacy concerns) with tier-based response times
Slack Community: Peer support network for knowledge sharing among Lindy users and automation best practices
Community Forum: community.lindy.ai for discussions, troubleshooting, feature requests with active user participation
Documentation: Lindy Academy with step-by-step tutorials for business users, video walkthroughs, use case examples
Onboarding: Self-service for Free/Pro, guided onboarding for Business, white-glove implementation for Enterprise with custom training
User-Focused Resources: Strong for business user adoption with non-technical language, visual guides, practical examples
CRITICAL GAP - No Developer Documentation: No API reference, code samples, technical architecture documentation, OpenAPI specs
CRITICAL GAP - No Phone Support: Email and community only for Free/Pro/Business tiers - phone access restricted to Enterprise only
LIMITATION - Support Quality Inconsistency: User reviews note 'inconsistent responsiveness on lower tiers' - common Trustpilot criticism
LIMITATION - Slow Response Times: Some users report 'writing to support twice with no response' - support quality concerns for non-enterprise customers
Multi-Channel Support: Email, live chat, phone support with tier-based response time guarantees
Enterprise Support: Dedicated customer success managers, priority support queues, SLA guarantees with 1-hour response times on critical issues
Professional Services: Implementation services included in enterprise packages with typical 4-month deployment timeline and project management
Documentation Portal: Available at docs.yellow.ai with API references, integration guides, mobile SDK documentation with code examples
Mobile SDK Resources: Comprehensive Android, iOS, React Native, Flutter, Cordova documentation with complete code examples, Postman collections, demo applications
Training & Onboarding: Included in enterprise packages with dedicated training resources and guided implementation support
Community Forums: Available for peer support, knowledge sharing, and best practices discussion among Yellow.ai users
Gartner Recognition: Magic Quadrant 'Challenger' status (2023/2025) provides third-party analyst validation and market positioning
Customer Base: Enterprise brands including Sony, Domino's, Hyundai, Volkswagen, Ferrellgas deployed across 85+ countries
G2 Feedback: 4.4/5 overall (106 reviews) with 9.3/10 customization, 9.2/10 proactive engagement - mixed post-onboarding support quality noted
Documentation Gaps: Web SDK documentation criticized as "hit and miss" by reviewers - mobile SDKs better documented than web integration
Learning Curve: Steep complexity curve noted by users - G2 reviewer: "Setup felt akin to solving a Rubik's cube blindfolded"
Developer Resources: Strong mobile SDK documentation, weak Python SDK (doesn't exist), limited API cookbook/advanced tutorial content
Documentation hub: Rich docs, tutorials, cookbooks, FAQs, API references for rapid onboarding
Developer Docs
Email and in-app support: Quick support via email and in-app chat for all users
Premium support: Premium and Enterprise plans include dedicated account managers and faster SLAs
Code samples: Cookbooks, step-by-step guides, and examples for every skill level
API Documentation
Active community: User community plus 5,000+ app integrations through Zapier ecosystem
Regular updates: Platform stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements automatically
Limitations & Considerations
NO Public REST API: Cannot manage agents, create workflows, or query knowledge base programmatically - blocks developer integration
NO Official SDKs: No Python, JavaScript, Ruby, Go, or any language SDK for programmatic access - workflow automation only
NO CLI Tools: No command-line interface for automation or scripting - dashboard-only management
NO Developer Console: No API sandbox, testing environment, or technical documentation for developers
Black Box RAG Implementation: Vector database, embedding models, similarity thresholds completely undisclosed - no transparency
No RAG Benchmarks: No published accuracy metrics, retrieval precision/recall, or latency measurements for evaluation
Search Fuzziness Constraint: Lower fuzziness values limit searches to first 1,500 files - meaningful limitation for large deployments
Character Storage Limits: 50M character maximum on Business tier - may constrain large enterprise knowledge bases vs unlimited competitors
Unpredictable Credit Consumption: Most common user complaint - 'credits depleted quickly and unpredictably' makes budgeting difficult
US-Only Data Residency: No documented EU data residency option - blocks customers with strict data localization requirements (GDPR, Digital Sovereignty)
No ISO 27001 Certification: Only SOC 2 Type II documented - ISO 27001 absence may limit enterprise procurement in regulated industries
1-Day Free Tier Log Retention: Severely limits troubleshooting and security incident investigation vs 30+ day industry standard
Learning Curve for Complex Workflows: Despite 'vibe coding' simplicity, sophisticated multi-agent systems and delegation rules require workflow design expertise
Support Quality Inconsistency: Mixed reviews noting slow/unresponsive support for non-enterprise tiers - support quality varies significantly by plan
No Manual Model Performance Comparison: Cannot A/B test different LLMs or compare model performance - manual experimentation required
Credit-Based Pricing Opacity: Difficult to forecast costs vs fixed per-seat or per-query pricing - budget planning challenging
NOT Ideal For: Developers needing RAG APIs, teams requiring transparent RAG implementation, EU data residency requirements, organizations needing predictable pricing, technical teams wanting embedding/retrieval control
Platform Category Mismatch: Fundamentally a workflow automation platform (competes with Zapier/Make) NOT a RAG-as-a-Service platform - architectural comparison to CustomGPT.ai is misleading
NOT a RAG-as-a-Service Platform: Full-stack enterprise conversational AI with embedded RAG - cannot use Yellow.ai purely as knowledge/RAG backend for custom applications
No API-First Development: Cannot programmatically create bots/agents, upload documents, manage knowledge bases, or directly query RAG endpoints - platform-centric architecture
Missing Developer Tools: No Python SDK (major gap for backend developers), no npm package for web SDK (script tag injection only), no OpenAPI specification published
Knowledge Ingestion Gaps: No Google Drive, Dropbox, Notion integration support - significant gap vs competitors like CustomGPT and YourGPT
YouTube & Audio Limitations: No YouTube transcript ingestion, no native audio/video file processing support
High Entry Barrier: $10K-$25K annual minimum with 4-month implementation timeline vs competitors offering $19-99/month self-service tiers
Use Case Mismatch: Excellent for enterprises needing omnichannel CX automation; poor fit for developers seeking programmable RAG APIs or simple chatbot embedding
Vendor Lock-In Risk: Proprietary platform with limited portability - difficult to migrate conversation flows, knowledge bases, and integrations to alternative solutions
Managed service approach: Less control over underlying RAG pipeline configuration compared to build-your-own solutions like LangChain
Vendor lock-in: Proprietary platform - migration to alternative RAG solutions requires rebuilding knowledge bases
Model selection: Limited to OpenAI (GPT-5.1 and 4 series) and Anthropic (Claude, opus and sonnet 4.5) - no support for other LLM providers (Cohere, AI21, open-source models)
Pricing at scale: Flat-rate pricing may become expensive for very high-volume use cases (millions of queries/month) compared to pay-per-use models
Customization limits: While highly configurable, some advanced RAG techniques (custom reranking, hybrid search strategies) may not be exposed
Language support: Supports 90+ languages but performance may vary for less common languages or specialized domains
Real-time data: Knowledge bases require re-indexing for updates - not ideal for real-time data requirements (stock prices, live inventory)
Enterprise features: Some advanced features (custom SSO, token authentication) only available on Enterprise plan with custom pricing
Proprietary L L M Architecture
N/A
YellowG LLM: Vendor claims <1% hallucination rate vs GPT-3's 22.7% (Yellow.ai internal benchmarks, no independent validation)
Response Speed: 0.6-second average response time optimized for conversational AI at enterprise scale
Orchestrator LLM: Context switching and multi-intent detection with zero-training deployment capability
Komodo-7B: Indonesia-focused model with 11+ regional language variants for Southeast Asian market dominance
T5 Fine-Tuning: SQuAD/TriviaQA training for Document Cognition Q&A extraction (75-85% accuracy claims)
Training Data: Anonymized historical customer interaction records with PII masking at data layer
Security Advantage: In-house LLM approach reduces exposure of sensitive enterprise data to external providers (OpenAI, Anthropic)
Enterprise Tuning: Models optimized for specific industries and use cases vs general-purpose capabilities
Dynamic Routing: Automatic model selection based on query complexity and context requirements
Limited Flexibility: Focus on enterprise-specific tuning vs raw model access and customization options
Benchmark Gap: No RAGAS scores, independent accuracy measurements, or third-party analyst validation published
N/A
Omnichannel Dominance
N/A
Messaging Platforms: WhatsApp (BSP provider status), Facebook Messenger, Instagram, Telegram, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Line, Viber, WeChat, Zalo, Google Chat
Voice Channels: IVR integration, Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa, telephony systems with full voice analytics
SMS & Email: Comprehensive support for text messaging and email communication workflows
Web Deployment: JavaScript widget (CDN-hosted), Progressive Web App with shareable links, iframe embedding
Mobile Native: SDKs for Android, iOS, React Native, Flutter, Cordova with complete code examples and demo apps
Unified Conversation: Cross-channel identity management and conversation continuity across all 35+ touchpoints
WhatsApp BSP Status: Official Business Solution Provider credentials for enhanced WhatsApp Business API features
Voice Analytics: IVR and telephony performance tracking with call quality metrics
After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both Lindy.ai and Yellow.ai are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.
When to Choose Lindy.ai
You value exceptional no-code usability: 4.9/5 g2 rating, 30-second setup vs 15-60 min with zapier/make
Massive integration ecosystem: 5,000+ apps via Pipedream Connect with 2,500+ pre-built actions
Claude Sonnet 4.5 default drives 10x customer growth - best-in-class language understanding
Best For: Exceptional no-code usability: 4.9/5 G2 rating, 30-second setup vs 15-60 min with Zapier/Make
When to Choose Yellow.ai
You value genuinely comprehensive 35+ channel coverage: whatsapp bsp, messenger, instagram, telegram, slack, teams, voice, sms
Switching between Lindy.ai and Yellow.ai requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.
Pricing Comparison Summary
Lindy.ai starts at custom pricing, while Yellow.ai begins at custom pricing. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.
Our Recommendation Process
Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality
For most organizations, the decision between Lindy.ai and Yellow.ai comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.
📚 Next Steps
Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.
• Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
• Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
• Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
• Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements
Last updated: December 11, 2025 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.
The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.
DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.
People Also Compare
Explore more AI tool comparisons to find the perfect solution for your needs
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...