Lindy.ai vs Yellow.ai

Make an informed decision with our comprehensive comparison. Discover which RAG solution perfectly fits your needs.

More about Yellow.aiMore about Lindy.aiGet Started Today
Priyansh Khodiyar's avatar
Priyansh KhodiyarDevRel at CustomGPT.ai

Fact checked and reviewed by Bill Cava

Published: 01.04.2025Updated: 25.04.2025

In this comprehensive guide, we compare Lindy.ai and Yellow.ai across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.

Overview

When choosing between Lindy.ai and Yellow.ai, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.

Quick Decision Guide

  • Choose Lindy.ai if: you value exceptional no-code usability: 4.9/5 g2 rating, 30-second setup vs 15-60 min with zapier/make
  • Choose Yellow.ai if: you value genuinely comprehensive 35+ channel coverage: whatsapp bsp, messenger, instagram, telegram, slack, teams, voice, sms

About Lindy.ai

Lindy.ai Landing Page Screenshot

Lindy.ai is ai-powered personal assistant for workflow automation. No-code AI agent platform positioning as 'AI employees' for workflow automation, NOT developer-focused RAG platform. 5,000+ integrations via Pipedream, Claude Sonnet 4.5 default, $5.1M revenue (Oct 2024), 4.9/5 G2 rating. Critical limitation: No public API or SDKs available. Founded in 2023, headquartered in San Francisco, CA, USA, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.

Overall Rating
81/100
Starting Price
Custom

About Yellow.ai

Yellow.ai Landing Page Screenshot

Yellow.ai is enterprise conversational ai platform with multi-llm orchestration. Enterprise conversational AI platform with embedded RAG capabilities processing 16 billion+ conversations annually. Multi-LLM orchestration across 35+ channels and 135+ languages with proprietary YellowG LLM claiming <1% hallucination rates. Founded in 2016, headquartered in San Mateo, CA, USA / Bengaluru, India, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.

Overall Rating
85/100
Starting Price
Custom

Key Differences at a Glance

In terms of user ratings, both platforms score similarly in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, pricing is comparable. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: AI Assistant versus Conversational AI. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.

⚠️ What This Comparison Covers

We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.

Detailed Feature Comparison

logo of lindy
Lindy.ai
logo of yellow
Yellow.ai
logo of customGPT logo
CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
  • Document Formats – PDF, DOCX, XLSX, CSV, TXT, HTML (20MB per file)
  • Cloud Integrations – Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint, auto 24-hour sync
  • ⚠️ Storage Limits – 1M chars (Free), 20M (Pro), 50M (Business)
  • ⚠️ Search Constraint – Fuzziness <100 limits to first 1,500 files
  • DocCog Engine – 75-85% accuracy with T5 model fine-tuned on SQuAD/TriviaQA
  • Formats – PDF, DOCX, DOC, PPTX, PPT, TXT via platform UI only
  • Enterprise integrations – Salesforce, ServiceNow, Confluence, SharePoint, AWS S3
  • Auto-sync – Hourly, daily, weekly configurable intervals
  • ⚠️ No cloud storage – No Google Drive, Dropbox, or Notion support
  • ⚠️ No API upload – Document management via UI only
  • 1,400+ file formats – PDF, DOCX, Excel, PowerPoint, Markdown, HTML + auto-extraction from ZIP/RAR/7Z archives
  • Website crawling – Sitemap indexing with configurable depth for help docs, FAQs, and public content
  • Multimedia transcription – AI Vision, OCR, YouTube/Vimeo/podcast speech-to-text built-in
  • Cloud integrations – Google Drive, SharePoint, OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion with auto-sync
  • Knowledge platforms – Zendesk, Freshdesk, HubSpot, Confluence, Shopify connectors
  • Massive scale – 60M words (Standard) / 300M words (Premium) per bot with no performance degradation
Integrations & Channels
  • 5,000+ Apps – Via Pipedream Connect with 2,500+ ready actions
  • Messaging – Slack, WhatsApp, Teams, Telegram, Discord, Twilio SMS
  • CRM – Salesforce (24 actions), HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho CRM
  • Productivity – Notion, Airtable, Google Workspace (Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Sheets, Drive)
  • Webhooks + HTTP – Inbound triggers and outbound API calls
  • 35+ channels – WhatsApp (BSP), Messenger, Instagram, Telegram, Slack, Teams, Line
  • Voice channels – IVR, Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa, telephony
  • Enterprise systems – Salesforce, ServiceNow, Confluence, SharePoint
  • Mobile SDKs – Android, iOS, React Native, Flutter, Cordova
  • ⚠️ No Python SDK – Major gap for backend developers
  • Website embedding – Lightweight JS widget or iframe with customizable positioning
  • CMS plugins – WordPress, WIX, Webflow, Framer, SquareSpace native support
  • 5,000+ app ecosystem – Zapier connects CRMs, marketing, e-commerce tools
  • MCP Server – Integrate with Claude Desktop, Cursor, ChatGPT, Windsurf
  • OpenAI SDK compatible – Drop-in replacement for OpenAI API endpoints
  • LiveChat + Slack – Native chat widgets with human handoff capabilities
Core Agent Features
  • Agent Autonomy Focus – Task execution vs conversational chatbot
  • Multi-Lingual – 30+ (voice), 50+ (transcription), 85+ (text)
  • ✅ Lead Capture – Real-time qualification, CRM sync (70% higher conversion claimed)
  • Agent Evals – Benchmarking with regression prevention
  • 16B+ conversations – Massive scale annually across enterprise deployments
  • 135+ languages – Including 11+ Indonesian variants (Komodo-7B)
  • Agentic RAG – Multi-checkpoint validation with guardrails
  • YellowG LLM – Claims <1% hallucination vs GPT-3's 22.7%
  • 0.6s response time – Optimized for conversational AI
  • Custom AI Agents – Autonomous GPT-4/Claude agents for business tasks
  • Multi-Agent Systems – Specialized agents for support, sales, knowledge
  • Memory & Context – Persistent conversation history across sessions
  • Tool Integration – Webhooks + 5,000 Zapier apps for automation
  • Continuous Learning – Auto re-indexing without manual retraining
Customization & Branding
  • Widget – Custom name, accent color, logo for expanded/collapsed states
  • Domain Restrictions – Control allowed deployment domains
  • Memory Snippets – Learning preferences saved across sessions
  • ⚠️ White-Label Unclear – Complete branding removal not explicitly confirmed
  • Visual Studio – Drag-and-drop conversation flow builder
  • White-labeling – Custom branding on Enterprise plan
  • Agent personality – Configurable tone and response style
  • RBAC – Six permission levels for access control
  • Full white-labeling included – Colors, logos, CSS, custom domains at no extra cost
  • 2-minute setup – No-code wizard with drag-and-drop interface
  • Persona customization – Control AI personality, tone, response style via pre-prompts
  • Visual theme editor – Real-time preview of branding changes
  • Domain allowlisting – Restrict embedding to approved sites only
L L M Model Options
  • Anthropic Claude – Sonnet 4.5 (default), Sonnet 3.7, Haiku 3.5
  • OpenAI – GPT-5, GPT-5 Codex, GPT-4o, GPT-4 Turbo, o3, o1
  • Google Gemini – 2.5 Pro, 2.5 Flash, 2.0 Flash
  • Per-Action Selection – Manual model choice affects credit consumption
  • ⚠️ No Auto-Routing – No dynamic model switching
  • YellowG LLM – Proprietary with <1% hallucination claims, 0.6s response
  • Komodo-7B – Indonesia-focused with 11+ regional languages
  • T5 Fine-Tuned – SQuAD/TriviaQA for Q&A extraction
  • GPT-3/3.5 – Integration documented
  • ⚠️ GPT-4/Claude unclear – Not explicitly confirmed in docs
  • ⚠️ No manual selection – Dynamic routing handles automatically
  • GPT-5.1 models – Latest thinking models (Optimal & Smart variants)
  • GPT-4 series – GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-4o available
  • Claude 4.5 – Anthropic's Opus available for Enterprise
  • Auto model routing – Balances cost/performance automatically
  • Zero API key management – All models managed behind the scenes
Developer Experience ( A P I & S D Ks)
  • ⚠️ CRITICAL LIMITATION – NO public REST API, GraphQL, or SDKs
  • Workarounds Only – Inbound webhooks, HTTP actions, Code sandboxes (~150ms)
  • User-Focused Docs – Lindy Academy for business users, NO API reference
  • Platform-first – APIs supplementary, not primary access
  • Available via API – User management, event pushing, webhooks
  • Mobile SDKs – Well-documented Android, iOS, React Native, Flutter
  • ⚠️ NOT via API – Bot creation, document upload, RAG querying
  • ⚠️ No Python SDK – Only mobile SDKs available
  • REST API – Full-featured for agents, projects, data ingestion, chat queries
  • Python SDK – Open-source customgpt-client with full API coverage
  • Postman collections – Pre-built requests for rapid prototyping
  • Webhooks – Real-time event notifications for conversations and leads
  • OpenAI compatible – Use existing OpenAI SDK code with minimal changes
Performance & Accuracy
  • Hybrid Search – Semantic + keyword with Fuzziness slider (0-100)
  • Hallucination Reduction – Human confirmation before actions
  • ⚠️ NO Published Benchmarks – No RAG accuracy or latency metrics
  • ⚠️ Black Box – Vector database and embedding models undisclosed
  • YellowG claims – <1% hallucination vs GPT-3's 22.7%
  • 0.6s latency – Average response time claimed
  • DocCog accuracy – 75-85% depending on complexity
  • Scale validated – 16B+ conversations annually
  • ⚠️ No published benchmarks – No independent validation
  • Sub-second responses – Optimized RAG with vector search and multi-layer caching
  • Benchmark-proven – 13% higher accuracy, 34% faster than OpenAI Assistants API
  • Anti-hallucination tech – Responses grounded only in your provided content
  • OpenGraph citations – Rich visual cards with titles, descriptions, images
  • 99.9% uptime – Auto-scaling infrastructure handles traffic spikes
Pricing & Scalability
  • Free: $0 – 400 credits, 1M char knowledge base
  • Pro: $49.99 – 5,000 credits, 20M chars, phone calls, Lindy branding
  • Business: $199.99-$299.99 – 20K-30K credits, 50M chars, custom branding
  • Enterprise: Custom – SSO, SCIM, dedicated support, custom training
  • ⚠️ Unpredictable Costs – Credit depletion speed is primary user complaint
  • Free tier – 1 bot, 2 channels, 100 MTUs (evaluation only)
  • Basic – ~$10,000/year for single use case
  • Standard – ~$25,000/year for up to 4 use cases
  • Enterprise – Custom with unlimited bots, on-premise options
  • ⚠️ 4-month implementation – Typical deployment timeline
  • Standard: $99/mo – 60M words, 10 bots
  • Premium: $449/mo – 300M words, 100 bots
  • Auto-scaling – Managed cloud scales with demand
  • Flat rates – No per-query charges
Security & Privacy
  • SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, PIPEDA, CCPA – Comprehensive compliance
  • Encryption – AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.2+ in transit
  • Enterprise SSO + SCIM – Automated user lifecycle management
  • ⚠️ US Data Residency Only – No explicit EU option documented
N/A
  • SOC 2 Type II + GDPR – Third-party audited compliance
  • Encryption – 256-bit AES at rest, SSL/TLS in transit
  • Access controls – RBAC, 2FA, SSO, domain allowlisting
  • Data isolation – Never trains on your data
Observability & Monitoring
  • Workflow Performance – Agent action visibility with recent runs
  • Audit Logs – User actions, data access on Business/Enterprise plans
  • ⚠️ Log Retention – 1 day (Free) severely constrains troubleshooting
  • ⚠️ NO RAG Metrics – Cannot track retrieval precision or recall
  • Analytics dashboard – Comprehensive conversation metrics
  • Deflection metrics – Automation success rates
  • Voice analytics – IVR and telephony tracking
  • 15-day audit logs – API activity retention
  • Real-time dashboard – Query volumes, token usage, response times
  • Customer Intelligence – User behavior patterns, popular queries, knowledge gaps
  • Conversation analytics – Full transcripts, resolution rates, common questions
  • Export capabilities – API export to BI tools and data warehouses
Support & Ecosystem
  • Email Support – support@lindy.ai, security@lindy.ai, privacy@lindy.ai
  • Slack + Forum – community.lindy.ai for peer support
  • 100+ Templates – Pre-built workflow automation scenarios
  • ⚠️ Support Inconsistency – Mixed reviews on responsiveness for lower tiers
  • Multi-channel support – Email, chat, phone with tier-based access
  • Enterprise support – Dedicated CSMs, priority SLAs
  • Gartner recognition – Magic Quadrant 'Challenger' (2023/2025)
  • G2 ratings – 4.4/5 (106 reviews), 9.3 customization
  • ⚠️ Steep learning curve – "Rubik's cube blindfolded" G2 review
  • Comprehensive docs – Tutorials, cookbooks, API references
  • Email + in-app support – Under 24hr response time
  • Premium support – Dedicated account managers for Premium/Enterprise
  • Open-source SDK – Python SDK, Postman, GitHub examples
  • 5,000+ Zapier apps – CRMs, e-commerce, marketing integrations
No- Code Interface & Usability
  • ✅ 4.9/5 G2 Rating – 109+ reviews validate ease of use
  • Agent Builder – Natural language prompts create complex agents
  • Setup Speed – 30 seconds vs 15-60 minutes with Zapier/Make
  • Drag-Drop Builder – Visual workflow construction, zero coding
  • Visual Studio – Drag-and-drop flow builder
  • Dynamic AI Agent – Zero-training deployment
  • Pre-built templates – Industry-specific scenarios
  • ⚠️ Reality check – G2 reviews cite "steep learning curve"
  • ⚠️ Developer effort – Required for journey updates despite no-code claims
  • 2-minute deployment – Fastest time-to-value in the industry
  • Wizard interface – Step-by-step with visual previews
  • Drag-and-drop – Upload files, paste URLs, connect cloud storage
  • In-browser testing – Test before deploying to production
  • Zero learning curve – Productive on day one
Autopilot & Computer Use ( Core Differentiator)
  • Unique Capability – AI agents operate cloud-based virtual computers
  • No API Required – Interact with any website/application through computer vision
  • E2B Sandboxes – Secure Python/JavaScript execution (~150ms startup)
  • ✅ Market Differentiation – Computer Use unique among no-code automation platforms
N/A
N/A
Multi- Agent Collaboration
  • Societies of Lindies – Multiple specialized agents with delegation rules
  • Context Preservation – Full conversation history passed between agents
  • Use Cases – Sales (SDR → AE → CS), Support (Triage → Technical → Escalation)
  • Learning Shared – Feedback across agent society for collective improvement
N/A
N/A
Lead Capture & Conversion
  • Real-Time Qualification – AI evaluates lead quality during conversation
  • Enrichment – Firmographic data, UTM attribution, validation
  • Auto CRM Sync – Qualified leads flow to Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho
  • ✅ 70% Higher Conversion – Claimed vs traditional forms (vendor claim)
N/A
N/A
R A G-as-a- Service Assessment
  • ⚠️ NOT a RAG Platform – Workflow automation for business users vs developers
  • Black-Box RAG – Hybrid search with no exposed retrieval controls
  • NO API, SDKs, CLI – No programmatic access for developers
  • Platform type – Full-stack enterprise CX, NOT pure RAG-as-a-Service
  • Critical distinction – RAG embedded, not exposed as API
  • ⚠️ Cannot use as RAG backend – Queries must flow through platform
  • ⚠️ No RAG endpoints – No embedding access or vector store API
  • Comparison warning – vs CustomGPT is architecturally misleading
  • Platform type – TRUE RAG-AS-A-SERVICE with managed infrastructure
  • API-first – REST API, Python SDK, OpenAI compatibility, MCP Server
  • No-code option – 2-minute wizard deployment for non-developers
  • Hybrid positioning – Serves both dev teams (APIs) and business users (no-code)
  • Enterprise ready – SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, WCAG 2.0, flat-rate pricing
Competitive Positioning
  • ✅ Primary Advantage – 4.9/5 G2 usability with 5,000+ integrations
  • Financial Validation – $5.1M revenue, $50M+ funding (Menlo, Battery, Coatue)
  • Claude Sonnet 4.5 Default – Drove 10x customer growth
  • ⚠️ Pricing Unpredictability – Credit-based model most common complaint
  • 35+ channel coverage – Unmatched omnichannel with WhatsApp BSP
  • Compliance leadership – SOC 2, ISO, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, FedRAMP
  • Gartner validated – Magic Quadrant Challenger status
  • ⚠️ Not RAG-as-a-Service – Embedded RAG, closed API
  • ⚠️ High entry barrier – $10K+ annual minimum
  • Market position – Leading RAG platform balancing enterprise accuracy with no-code usability. Trusted by 6,000+ orgs including Adobe, MIT, Dropbox.
  • Key differentiators – #1 benchmarked accuracy • 1,400+ formats • Full white-labeling included • Flat-rate pricing
  • vs OpenAI – 10% lower hallucination, 13% higher accuracy, 34% faster
  • vs Botsonic/Chatbase – More file formats, source citations, no hidden costs
  • vs LangChain – Production-ready in 2 min vs weeks of development
A I Models
  • Default: Claude Sonnet 4.5 – 'Almost no one overrides' per Anthropic
  • Claude Family – Sonnet 4.5, 3.7, Haiku 3.5 (200K context)
  • OpenAI – GPT-5, GPT-4o, GPT-4 Turbo, o3, o1
  • Google – Gemini 2.5 Pro, 2.5 Flash, 2.0 Flash
  • YellowG LLM – Proprietary with <1% hallucination claims
  • Komodo-7B – 11+ Indonesian language variants
  • Orchestrator LLM – Context switching, multi-intent detection
  • T5 Fine-Tuned – DocCog Q&A extraction
  • ⚠️ Limited flexibility – No manual model selection
  • OpenAI – GPT-5.1 (Optimal/Smart), GPT-4 series
  • Anthropic – Claude 4.5 Opus/Sonnet (Enterprise)
  • Auto-routing – Intelligent model selection for cost/performance
  • Managed – No API keys or fine-tuning required
R A G Capabilities
  • Hybrid Search – Semantic + keyword with Fuzziness slider (0-100)
  • Document Processing – PDF, DOCX, XLSX, CSV, TXT, HTML (20MB)
  • Cloud Integration – Auto 24-hour sync (Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint)
  • ⚠️ Black Box – Vector database, embedding models undisclosed
  • ⚠️ NO Developer Control – Cannot customize retrieval parameters
  • Agentic RAG – Multi-checkpoint validation with guardrails
  • DocCog – 75-85% accuracy for Q&A extraction
  • Hallucination prevention – Proprietary training approach
  • Knowledge sync – Configurable intervals for external sources
  • ⚠️ Closed architecture – No direct API or embedding access
  • GPT-4 + RAG – Outperforms OpenAI in independent benchmarks
  • Anti-hallucination – Responses grounded in your content only
  • Automatic citations – Clickable source links in every response
  • Sub-second latency – Optimized vector search and caching
  • Scale to 300M words – No performance degradation at scale
Use Cases
  • Sales Automation – Lead qualification, scoring, enrichment, CRM syncing
  • Customer Support – Email triage, routing, FAQ, escalation
  • Voice Agents (Gaia) – 30+ language phone automation with call transfer
  • ⚠️ NOT Ideal For – Developers needing RAG APIs, EU residency
  • Customer service – 90% automation across 35+ channels
  • Employee experience – IT support, HR FAQs, leave applications
  • E-commerce – Shopping assistance, order tracking, fraud detection
  • Regulated industries – Healthcare, financial services, government
  • Customer support – 24/7 AI handling common queries with citations
  • Internal knowledge – HR policies, onboarding, technical docs
  • Sales enablement – Product info, lead qualification, education
  • Documentation – Help centers, FAQs with auto-crawling
  • E-commerce – Product recommendations, order assistance
Security & Compliance
  • SOC 2 Type II + HIPAA with BAA – Independently audited
  • GDPR + PIPEDA + CCPA – Multi-region privacy compliance
  • AES-256 + TLS 1.2+ – Encryption at rest and in transit
  • ⚠️ NO ISO 27001 – May limit enterprise procurement
  • SOC 2 Type II – Independently audited
  • ISO certifications – 27001, 27018, 27701
  • HIPAA/GDPR/PCI DSS – Healthcare, privacy, payment compliance
  • FedRAMP – US government authorized
  • 6 data regions – US, EU, Singapore, India, Indonesia, UAE
  • SOC 2 Type II + GDPR – Regular third-party audits, full EU compliance
  • 256-bit AES encryption – Data at rest; SSL/TLS in transit
  • SSO + 2FA + RBAC – Enterprise access controls with role-based permissions
  • Data isolation – Never trains on customer data
  • Domain allowlisting – Restrict chatbot to approved domains
Pricing & Plans
  • Free: $0 – 400 credits, 1M chars, 1-day logs
  • Pro: $49.99 – 5K credits, 20M chars, phone calls
  • Business: $199.99-$299.99 – 20K-30K credits, 50M chars, branding
  • ⚠️ PRIMARY COMPLAINT – Unpredictable credit consumption difficult to budget
N/A
  • Standard: $99/mo – 10 chatbots, 60M words, 5K items/bot
  • Premium: $449/mo – 100 chatbots, 300M words, 20K items/bot
  • Enterprise: Custom – SSO, dedicated support, custom SLAs
  • 7-day free trial – Full Standard access, no charges
  • Flat-rate pricing – No per-query charges, no hidden costs
Support & Documentation
  • Lindy Academy – Step-by-step tutorials for business users
  • 100+ Templates – Pre-built workflows for common scenarios
  • Slack + Forum – community.lindy.ai for peer support
  • ⚠️ NO Developer Docs – No API reference or technical architecture
N/A
  • Documentation hub – Docs, tutorials, API references
  • Support channels – Email, in-app chat, dedicated managers (Premium+)
  • Open-source – Python SDK, Postman, GitHub examples
  • Community – User community + 5,000 Zapier integrations
Limitations & Considerations
  • NO Public REST API – Cannot manage agents programmatically
  • Black Box RAG – Vector database, embeddings undisclosed
  • Search Constraint – Fuzziness <100 limits to 1,500 files
  • Credit Unpredictability – Most common user complaint about costs
  • ⚠️ Platform Mismatch – Workflow automation vs RAG comparison misleading
  • ⚠️ NOT RAG-as-a-Service – Embedded RAG, cannot use as knowledge backend
  • ⚠️ No API-first development – Cannot create bots or upload docs via API
  • ⚠️ Missing developer tools – No Python SDK, no npm package, no OpenAPI spec
  • ⚠️ No cloud storage – No Google Drive, Dropbox, Notion integration
  • ⚠️ High entry barrier – $10K-$25K annual, 4-month implementation
  • Best for – Enterprise omnichannel CX; poor fit for RAG API developers
  • Managed service – Less control over RAG pipeline vs build-your-own
  • Model selection – OpenAI + Anthropic only; no Cohere, AI21, open-source
  • Real-time data – Requires re-indexing; not ideal for live inventory/prices
  • Enterprise features – Custom SSO only on Enterprise plan
Core Chatbot Features
N/A
  • Multi-turn conversations – Context across turns with intent detection
  • 150+ languages – Automatic detection with native processing
  • Human handoff – Full context transfer with SLA tracking
  • Voice AI – 50+ language support with sentiment analysis
  • 170+ integrations – Complex workflow automation
  • ✅ #1 accuracy – Median 5/5 in independent benchmarks, 10% lower hallucination than OpenAI
  • ✅ Source citations – Every response includes clickable links to original documents
  • ✅ 93% resolution rate – Handles queries autonomously, reducing human workload
  • ✅ 92 languages – Native multilingual support without per-language config
  • ✅ Lead capture – Built-in email collection, custom forms, real-time notifications
  • ✅ Human handoff – Escalation with full conversation context preserved
Customization & Flexibility ( Behavior & Knowledge)
N/A
  • Agent persona – Name, role, tone, communication style
  • Conversation rules – Custom behavior for specific situations
  • Multi-KB support – Role-based access, cross-KB search
  • ⚠️ No embedding control – Retrieval mechanisms not exposed
  • ⚠️ No programmatic API – UI-only knowledge management
  • Live content updates – Add/remove content with automatic re-indexing
  • System prompts – Shape agent behavior and voice through instructions
  • Multi-agent support – Different bots for different teams
  • Smart defaults – No ML expertise required for custom behavior
Additional Considerations
N/A
  • Platform type – Enterprise CX platform with embedded RAG, NOT RaaS
  • ✅ 35+ channels – Exceptional omnichannel with 135+ languages
  • ✅ Compliance breadth – SOC 2, ISO, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, FedRAMP
  • ⚠️ Not for developers – No RAG API, Python SDK, or programmatic control
  • ⚠️ High entry barrier – $10K-$25K annual with 4-month implementation
  • Best for – Enterprises needing omnichannel CX automation at scale
  • Time-to-value – 2-minute deployment vs weeks with DIY
  • Always current – Auto-updates to latest GPT models
  • Proven scale – 6,000+ organizations, millions of queries
  • Multi-LLM – OpenAI + Claude reduces vendor lock-in

Ready to experience the CustomGPT difference?

Start Free Trial →

Final Thoughts

Final Verdict: Lindy.ai vs Yellow.ai

After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both Lindy.ai and Yellow.ai are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.

When to Choose Lindy.ai

  • You value exceptional no-code usability: 4.9/5 g2 rating, 30-second setup vs 15-60 min with zapier/make
  • Massive integration ecosystem: 5,000+ apps via Pipedream Connect with 2,500+ pre-built actions
  • Claude Sonnet 4.5 default drives 10x customer growth - best-in-class language understanding

Best For: Exceptional no-code usability: 4.9/5 G2 rating, 30-second setup vs 15-60 min with Zapier/Make

When to Choose Yellow.ai

  • You value genuinely comprehensive 35+ channel coverage: whatsapp bsp, messenger, instagram, telegram, slack, teams, voice, sms
  • Exceptional compliance credentials: SOC 2, ISO 27001/27018/27701, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, FedRAMP
  • Multi-region data centers (US, EU, Singapore, India, Indonesia, UAE) with customer-selected residency

Best For: Genuinely comprehensive 35+ channel coverage: WhatsApp BSP, Messenger, Instagram, Telegram, Slack, Teams, voice, SMS

Migration & Switching Considerations

Switching between Lindy.ai and Yellow.ai requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.

Pricing Comparison Summary

Lindy.ai starts at custom pricing, while Yellow.ai begins at custom pricing. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.

Our Recommendation Process

  1. Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
  2. Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
  3. Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
  4. Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
  5. Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality

For most organizations, the decision between Lindy.ai and Yellow.ai comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.

📚 Next Steps

Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.

  • • Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
  • • Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
  • • Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
  • • Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements

Last updated: February 24, 2026 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.

See Also

Ready to Get Started with CustomGPT?

Join thousands of businesses that trust CustomGPT for their AI needs. Choose the path that works best for you.

Start Your Free Trial

Experience the full power of CustomGPT risk-free.

Get Started
RECOMMENDED

Request a Demo

See how CustomGPT can transform your business operations.

Get Started

Contact Sales

Get personalized guidance from our expert team.

Get Started

Why Choose CustomGPT?

97% Accuracy

Industry-leading benchmarks

5-Min Setup

Get started instantly

24/7 Support

Expert help when you need it

Enterprise Ready

Scale with confidence

Trusted by leading companies worldwide

Fortune 500Fortune 500Fortune 500Fortune 500Fortune 500Fortune 500

CustomGPT

The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.

Get API KeyDocumentationRead our benchmarks
Get in touch
Contact Us

Join the Discussion

Loading comments...

Priyansh Khodiyar's avatar

Priyansh Khodiyar

DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.

Watch: Understanding AI Tool Comparisons