In this comprehensive guide, we compare Progress Agentic RAG and Supavec across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.
Overview
When choosing between Progress Agentic RAG and Supavec, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose Progress Agentic RAG if: you value proprietary remi v2 model (30x faster inference) addresses hallucination problem with continuous quality monitoring - differentiated capability absent from most competitors
Choose Supavec if: you value 100% open source with no vendor lock-in
About Progress Agentic RAG
Progress Agentic RAG is enterprise application development and deployment platform. Enterprise RAG-as-a-Service platform launched Sept 2025 following Progress Software's acquisition of Barcelona-based Nuclia. Combines SOC2/ISO 27001 security with proprietary REMi evaluation model for continuous answer quality monitoring. Built on open-source NucliaDB (710+ GitHub stars) with Python/JavaScript SDKs. Starting at $700/month. Founded in 2019 (Nuclia), acquired 2025, headquartered in Barcelona, Spain (Nuclia) / Bedford, MA, USA (Progress), the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
82/100
Starting Price
$700/mo
About Supavec
Supavec is the open source rag as a service platform. SupaVec is an open-source RAG platform that serves as an alternative to Carbon.ai. Built on transparency and data sovereignty, it allows developers to build powerful RAG applications with complete control over their infrastructure, supporting any data source at any scale. Founded in 2024, headquartered in Remote, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
84/100
Starting Price
Custom
Key Differences at a Glance
In terms of user ratings, both platforms score similarly in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, Supavec offers more competitive entry pricing. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: Enterprise Software versus RAG Platform. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.
⚠️ What This Comparison Covers
We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.
Detailed Feature Comparison
Progress Agentic RAG
Supavec
CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
60+ Document Formats: PDF, Word (.docx), Excel, PowerPoint, plain text, email formats with automatic parsing
Multimedia Processing: Automatic speech-to-text (MP3, WAV, AIFF), video transcript extraction (MP4, etc.), OCR for scanned documents/images
Cloud Connectors: SharePoint, Confluence, OneDrive, Google Drive, Amazon S3 with direct integration
Sync Agent Desktop App: 60-minute automatic sync with content hashing to prevent redundant reindexing
Manual Upload Interface: Files, folders, web links, sitemaps, Q&A pairs via dashboard
Fast Deployment: 2-hour initial ingestion, 48-hour full deployment timeline
CRITICAL GAPS: NO Dropbox integration, NO Notion integration, NO explicit YouTube transcript extraction documented
Architecture Focus: Comprehensive knowledge retrieval vs lead conversion focus (unlike Drift)
No one-click Google Drive or Notion connectors—you’ll script the fetch and hit the API yourself.
Because it’s open source, you can build connectors to anything—Postgres, Mongo, S3, you name it.
Runs on Supabase and scales sideways, chunking millions of docs for fast retrieval.
Lets you ingest more than 1,400 file formats—PDF, DOCX, TXT, Markdown, HTML, and many more—via simple drag-and-drop or API.
Crawls entire sites through sitemaps and URLs, automatically indexing public help-desk articles, FAQs, and docs.
Turns multimedia into text on the fly: YouTube videos, podcasts, and other media are auto-transcribed with built-in OCR and speech-to-text.
View Transcription Guide
Connects to Google Drive, SharePoint, Notion, Confluence, HubSpot, and more through API connectors or Zapier.
See Zapier Connectors
Supports both manual uploads and auto-sync retraining, so your knowledge base always stays up to date.
CSS Customization: Shadow DOM architecture with cssPath attribute for advanced styling
White-Labeling: Full OEM deployment support via API-first design
MISSING FEATURES: NO lead capture, NO human handoff/escalation workflows, NO proactive alerting (monitoring exists, alerting undocumented)
Stateless RAG Architecture: Pure retrieval and generation without built-in conversation state—developers implement multi-turn context and session management in application layer
Model-Agnostic Generation: Defaults to GPT-3.5 but supports GPT-4, self-hosted LLMs (Llama, Mistral), and any OpenAI-compatible models—no vendor lock-in for generation
Postgres Vector Search: Fast approximate nearest neighbor search using pgvector extension with cosine similarity—handles millions of chunks efficiently at enterprise scale
Metadata Filtering: Custom metadata tagging and filtering capabilities enabling organized knowledge management and multi-tenant architectures
Real-Time Re-Indexing: Almost instant document re-embedding when updating or overwriting knowledge sources—no lengthy reprocessing delays
REST API Foundation: Straightforward endpoints for file uploads, text uploads, and search with plain-JSON responses—easy integration from any programming language
Supabase Integration: Built on Supabase infrastructure leveraging PostgreSQL, Row-Level Security (RLS), and battle-tested backend for familiar deployment
LIMITATION - No Built-In Chat UI: API-only platform requiring developers to build custom chat interfaces—not a turnkey chatbot solution with widgets
LIMITATION - No Lead Capture: No built-in lead generation, email collection, or CRM integration capabilities—must be implemented at application layer
LIMITATION - No Human Handoff: No escalation workflows, live agent transfer, or fallback mechanisms—conversational features are developer responsibility
LIMITATION - No Multi-Channel Integrations: No native Slack, Teams, WhatsApp, or messaging platform connectors—developers build integration layer
LIMITATION - No Session Management: Stateless API design without conversation history tracking or multi-turn context retention—application must manage state
LIMITATION - No Advanced RAG: Missing hybrid search, reranking, knowledge graphs, multi-query retrieval, query expansion found in enterprise platforms
LIMITATION - No Observability Dashboard: No analytics, conversation metrics, or performance monitoring UI—must integrate external logging tools
Custom AI Agents: Build autonomous agents powered by GPT-4 and Claude that can perform tasks independently and make real-time decisions based on business knowledge
Decision-Support Capabilities: AI agents analyze proprietary data to provide insights, recommendations, and actionable responses specific to your business domain
Multi-Agent Systems: Deploy multiple specialized AI agents that can collaborate and optimize workflows in areas like customer support, sales, and internal knowledge management
Memory & Context Management: Agents maintain conversation history and persistent context for coherent multi-turn interactions
View Agent Documentation
Tool Integration: Agents can trigger actions, integrate with external APIs via webhooks, and connect to 5,000+ apps through Zapier for automated workflows
Hyper-Accurate Responses: Leverages advanced RAG technology and retrieval mechanisms to deliver context-aware, citation-backed responses grounded in your knowledge base
Continuous Learning: Agents improve over time through automatic re-indexing of knowledge sources and integration of new data without manual retraining
Additional Considerations
Recent Acquisition (June 2025): Progress Software acquired Nuclia for $50M - platform transitioning under new ownership with potential strategic direction changes
Genuine No-Code + Developer Appeal: Dual-track value proposition - non-technical teams use dashboard, developers leverage API/SDKs for custom builds
REMi Quality Differentiator: Proprietary continuous evaluation model (30x faster in v2) addresses hallucination problem absent from most RAG competitors
Open-Source Trust Factor: NucliaDB (710+ GitHub stars, AGPLv3) provides code transparency vs black-box platforms - security audits possible
Multimodal Strength: OCR for images, speech-to-text for audio/video creates comprehensive searchable corpus beyond text-only competitors
Enterprise RAG Focus: Platform optimized for knowledge retrieval and semantic search - not conversational marketing/sales engagement like Drift/Yellow.ai
Progress Ecosystem Integration: OpenEdge database connector, Sitefinity CMS integration provides distribution channels unavailable to standalone platforms
Documentation Fragmentation: Dual portals (docs.rag.progress.cloud + legacy docs.nuclia.dev) during transition may cause developer confusion
Competitive Pricing Entry: $700/month Fly tier undercuts enterprise RAG alternatives while providing genuine capabilities vs limited free tiers
Best For: Organizations wanting model flexibility (7 providers), multimodal indexing, open-source transparency, and developer API access without managing infrastructure
No vendor lock-in: transparent code, offline option, host wherever you like.
Focuses on core RAG—no SSO, dashboards, or fancy UI included.
Great for devs who want full control or must keep data in-house.
Conversation flow, advanced prompts, fancy UI—all yours to build.
Slashes engineering overhead with an all-in-one RAG platform—no in-house ML team required.
Gets you to value quickly: launch a functional AI assistant in minutes.
Stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements, so you’re always on the latest tech.
Balances top-tier accuracy with ease of use, perfect for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects.
Customization & Branding
Prompt Lab: Test LLMs side-by-side using actual customer data with real-time comparison
Four Index Types: Document Index (property filtering), Full Text (keyword/fuzzy search), Chunk/Vector (semantic similarity), Knowledge Graph (entity relationships)
Dynamic Sharding: Automatic shard creation as vectors grow with index node replication for fault tolerance
Open-Source Transparency: NucliaDB foundation (710+ GitHub stars) provides visibility into retrieval mechanisms vs black-box platforms (Lindy.ai)
Comparison Alignment: Direct architectural comparison to CustomGPT.ai is valid - both are RAG-as-a-Service platforms with API-first design
Use Case Fit: Organizations prioritizing knowledge retrieval, semantic search, and generative Q&A over conversational marketing/sales engagement
Platform Type: TRUE RAG-AS-A-SERVICE API - Lightweight MIT-licensed open-source RAG backend built on Supabase with self-hosting capability and minimal API surface
Core Mission: Provide transparent, open-source alternative to proprietary RAG services (Carbon.ai shutdown response) with full cost control and no vendor lock-in
Target Market: Developers building custom RAG applications on budget, startups minimizing costs with self-hosting, organizations requiring data sovereignty with Supabase infrastructure
RAG Implementation: Standard RAG architecture with document chunking, OpenAI embeddings, Postgres pgvector semantic search—focused on simplicity over advanced techniques
API-First Design: Pure REST API for retrieval and generation without GUI, widgets, or conversational features—intentionally minimal abstraction for developer control
Self-Hosting Advantage: MIT license enables complete on-premises deployment keeping all data on your servers—ideal for GDPR, HIPAA, data residency compliance
Managed Service Option: Cloud-hosted plans (Free: 100 calls/month, Basic: $190/year for 750 calls/month, Enterprise: $1,490/year for 5K calls/month) eliminate infrastructure management
Pricing Model: Free self-hosting (MIT license) or extremely affordable hosted plans—40-90% cheaper than commercial RAG platforms with no per-document charges or user seat fees
Data Sources: File uploads (PDF, Markdown, TXT) via REST API or raw text ingestion—NO pre-built Google Drive, Notion, or cloud storage connectors (manual scripting required)
Model Flexibility: Model-agnostic with GPT-3.5 default, GPT-4, or self-hosted LLM support—users connect own OpenAI API keys without Supavec markup on AI costs
Security Foundation: Supabase Row-Level Security (RLS) for multi-tenant data isolation, HTTPS encryption, AES-256 at-rest encryption—self-hosting enables GDPR/HIPAA compliance
Support Model: Community GitHub/Discord support for free tier, email support for paid plans—no dedicated CSMs, SLAs, or enterprise account management
Open-Source Ecosystem: Transparent code on GitHub welcoming PRs, forks, and community contributions—no proprietary components or vendor lock-in
LIMITATION - Developer-Only Platform: Requires coding skills for setup, integration, and maintenance—non-technical teams cannot use without developer support
LIMITATION - Basic RAG Features: Standard retrieval without hybrid search, reranking, knowledge graphs, multi-query fusion, or hallucination detection—advanced features require custom development
LIMITATION - No Turnkey Features: No GUI dashboard, conversation management, lead capture, analytics, or multi-channel integrations—pure RAG API requiring application layer development
Comparison Validity: Architectural comparison to full-featured chatbot platforms like CustomGPT.ai requires context—Supavec is lightweight RAG backend API vs complete no-code chatbot builder
Use Case Fit: Perfect for developers wanting lightweight RAG backend without heavy frameworks, startups minimizing costs with Supabase self-hosting, teams building custom chatbots needing simple REST API for retrieval without paying for unused dashboard features
Core Architecture: Serverless RAG infrastructure with automatic embedding generation, vector search optimization, and LLM orchestration fully managed behind API endpoints
API-First Design: Comprehensive REST API with well-documented endpoints for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data (1,400+ formats), and querying chat
API Documentation
Developer Experience: Open-source Python SDK (customgpt-client), Postman collections, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, and extensive cookbooks for rapid integration
No-Code Alternative: Wizard-style web dashboard enables non-developers to upload content, brand widgets, and deploy chatbots without touching code
Hybrid Target Market: Serves both developer teams wanting robust APIs AND business users seeking no-code RAG deployment - unique positioning vs pure API platforms (Cohere) or pure no-code tools (Jotform)
RAG Technology Leadership: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, proprietary anti-hallucination mechanisms, and citation-backed responses
Benchmark Details
Deployment Flexibility: Cloud-hosted SaaS with auto-scaling, API integrations, embedded chat widgets, ChatGPT Plugin support, and hosted MCP Server for Claude/Cursor/ChatGPT
Enterprise Readiness: SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling, domain allowlisting, RBAC with 2FA/SSO, and flat-rate pricing without per-query charges
Use Case Fit: Ideal for organizations needing both rapid no-code deployment AND robust API capabilities, teams handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), and businesses requiring production-ready RAG without building ML infrastructure from scratch
Competitive Positioning: Bridges the gap between developer-first platforms (Cohere, Deepset) requiring heavy coding and no-code chatbot builders (Jotform, Kommunicate) lacking API depth - offers best of both worlds
Competitive Positioning
Market Position: Enterprise RAG-as-a-Service with genuine no-code accessibility + developer-first API design (dual-track appeal)
vs. CustomGPT: Similar RAG-as-a-Service category, Progress emphasizes REMi quality monitoring + open-source foundation differentiation
vs. Drift/Yellow.ai: TRUE RAG platform vs conversational marketing/sales engagement platforms (fundamentally different categories)
vs. Lindy.ai: Full API/SDK access vs NO public API (Progress developer-friendly, Lindy no-code only)
Integration Gaps: NO native messaging channels (Slack/WhatsApp/Teams) vs omnichannel competitors - requires custom development
HIPAA Gap: No documented certification creates healthcare trust gap vs compliant competitors (Drift has HIPAA)
Recent Acquisition Risk: June 2025 Progress purchase means platform still maturing under new ownership with potential direction changes
Progress Ecosystem Advantage: Integration with OpenEdge, Sitefinity CMS provides distribution channels unavailable to standalone competitors
Market position: MIT-licensed open-source RAG API built on Supabase, offering lightweight alternative to Carbon.ai with self-hosting capability and minimal API surface
Target customers: Developers building custom RAG applications on budget, startups wanting to avoid RAG platform costs, and organizations requiring self-hosted solutions with Supabase infrastructure for data sovereignty
Key competitors: Carbon.ai, LangChain, SimplyRetrieve, and hosted RAG APIs like CustomGPT/Pinecone Assistant
Competitive advantages: MIT open-source license with no vendor lock-in, Supabase foundation for familiar infrastructure, model-agnostic with easy LLM swapping (GPT-3.5, GPT-4, self-hosted), REST API simplicity with straightforward endpoints, privacy-focused with self-hosting option keeping data on your servers, and minimal abstraction enabling deep customization
Pricing advantage: Free (MIT license) for self-hosting; hosted plans extremely affordable ($190/year Basic for 750 calls/month, $1,490/year Enterprise for 5K calls/month); best value for low-volume applications or teams with Supabase expertise wanting to avoid expensive RAG platforms; 40-90% cheaper than commercial alternatives
Use case fit: Perfect for developers wanting lightweight RAG backend without heavy frameworks, startups minimizing costs with self-hosting on existing Supabase infrastructure, and teams building custom chatbot front-ends needing simple REST API for retrieval without paying for unused dashboard features
Market position: Leading all-in-one RAG platform balancing enterprise-grade accuracy with developer-friendly APIs and no-code usability for rapid deployment
Target customers: Mid-market to enterprise organizations needing production-ready AI assistants, development teams wanting robust APIs without building RAG infrastructure, and businesses requiring 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription (YouTube, podcasts)
Key competitors: OpenAI Assistants API, Botsonic, Chatbase.co, Azure AI, and custom RAG implementations using LangChain
Competitive advantages: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling included, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, hosted MCP Server support (Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT), generous data limits (60M words Standard, 300M Premium), and flat monthly pricing without per-query charges
Pricing advantage: Transparent flat-rate pricing at $99/month (Standard) and $449/month (Premium) with generous included limits; no hidden costs for API access, branding removal, or basic features; best value for teams needing both no-code dashboard and developer APIs in one platform
Use case fit: Ideal for businesses needing both rapid no-code deployment and robust API capabilities, organizations handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), teams requiring white-label chatbots with source citations for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects, and companies wanting all-in-one RAG without managing ML infrastructure
Deployment & Infrastructure
Fully Managed Cloud: EU (primary) and US data centers with regional API routing (https://{region}.rag.progress.cloud/api/v1/)
Hybrid Deployment: Cloud processing with on-premise NucliaDB storage for data sovereignty requirements
Complete On-Premise: Enterprise tier supports 100% on-premise deployment for maximum data governance
AWS Marketplace: Available November 2025 for streamlined enterprise procurement with existing cloud spend
Dynamic Scaling: Automatic shard creation as vector counts grow with index node replication
Web Component Embedding: <nuclia-search-bar> and <nuclia-chat> for website integration
Multi-Region Support: Regional data residency options (EU/US) for compliance requirements
N/A
N/A
Customer Base & Case Studies
SRS Distribution (Wholesale Building Materials): "Progress Agentic RAG has fundamentally changed how we access and act on information across our organisation. Its ability to deliver fast, accurate, and verifiable insights from our unstructured data has been a game-changer for productivity and decision-making."
BrokerChooser (Financial Services): Replaced keyword search with generative AI, reporting significant conversion increases and better user experience
NAFEMS (Engineering Simulation Association): Knowledge discovery across thousands of technical publications for international membership community
Althaia Hospitals (Spain's Largest Central Catalonia Hospital): Medical protocol search supporting 5,000+ healthcare professionals
Columbia Business School: Academic knowledge discovery and research support
Barry University: Education sector deployment for institutional knowledge management
CCOO (Spain's Largest Trade Union): 1M+ members served with knowledge retrieval platform
Buff Sportswear: Commercial deployment for product and customer knowledge management
Pre-Acquisition Scale: ~20 customers across healthcare, pharmaceutical, education, public administration sectors
N/A
N/A
A I Models
Anthropic Models: Claude 3.7, Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 for safety-focused, high-quality generation
OpenAI Models: ChatGPT 4o, 4o mini for industry-leading language capabilities
Google Models: Gemini Flash 2.5, PaLM2 for multimodal and search-optimized tasks
Meta Models: Llama 3.2 for open-source flexibility and customization
Microsoft/Azure: Mistral Large 2 for enterprise deployments with Azure integration
Cohere Models: Command-R suite for retrieval-optimized generation
Nuclia Private GenAI: 100% data isolation mode for maximum security without third-party LLM exposure
Model Switching: Change providers without architectural changes via Prompt Lab for side-by-side testing
Model-agnostic architecture: Defaults to GPT-3.5 Turbo for cost-effectiveness, with full support for GPT-4, GPT-4-turbo, and any OpenAI-compatible models
Self-hosted model support: Bring your own LLM - compatible with self-hosted models like Llama, Mistral, or custom fine-tuned models via API endpoints
No model lock-in: Switch between models by changing configuration or prompt path in code without platform restrictions
No markup on AI costs: Users connect their own OpenAI API keys or self-hosted endpoints, paying providers directly without Supavec markup
Note: No built-in model routing: No automatic model selection or load balancing - developers must implement routing logic manually
Note: No prompt optimization layer: Plain RAG implementation without advanced prompt engineering or anti-hallucination guardrails
Quality dependency: Output quality rests entirely on chosen LLM and developer's prompt engineering skills
Primary models: GPT-5.1 and 4 series from OpenAI, and Anthropic's Claude 4.5 (opus and sonnet) for enterprise needs
Automatic model selection: Balances cost and performance by automatically selecting the appropriate model for each request
Model Selection Details
Proprietary optimizations: Custom prompt engineering and retrieval enhancements for high-quality, citation-backed answers
Managed infrastructure: All model management handled behind the scenes - no API keys or fine-tuning required from users
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms ensure chatbot only answers based on provided content, improving trust and factual accuracy
R A G Capabilities
Agentic RAG Engine: Retrieval agents autonomously select optimal strategies based on query characteristics
Four-Index Hybrid Search: Document (property filtering), Full Text (keyword/fuzzy), Vector/Chunk (semantic), Knowledge Graph (entity relationships)
Multimodal Processing: OCR for scanned documents/images, automatic speech-to-text for audio (MP3, WAV, AIFF), video transcript extraction
60+ Document Formats: PDF, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, plain text, email formats with automatic parsing
Open-Source Foundation: NucliaDB (710+ GitHub stars, AGPLv3) provides transparency into retrieval mechanisms vs black-box platforms
Standard RAG architecture: Document chunking with vector embeddings stored in Postgres pgvector extension for semantic search
Embedding generation: Automatic embedding creation during document upload using OpenAI embedding models or custom embedding endpoints
Vector search: Postgres vector search with cosine similarity for retrieval, handling millions of chunks efficiently
Re-indexing speed: Almost instant document re-embedding when updating or overwriting knowledge sources
Metadata support: Custom metadata tagging and filtering capabilities for organized knowledge management
Note: No advanced RAG features: No hybrid search (semantic + keyword), no reranking, no multi-query retrieval, no query expansion
Note: No hallucination detection: No built-in citation validation, factual consistency scoring, or confidence thresholds - developers must implement manually
Note: No retrieval parameter controls: Chunking strategy, similarity thresholds, and top-k configuration require code-level changes
Core architecture: GPT-4 combined with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology, outperforming OpenAI in RAG benchmarks
RAG Performance
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms reduce hallucinations and ensure responses are grounded in provided content
Benchmark Details
Automatic citations: Each response includes clickable citations pointing to original source documents for transparency and verification
Optimized pipeline: Efficient vector search, smart chunking, and caching for sub-second reply times
Scalability: Maintains speed and accuracy for massive knowledge bases with tens of millions of words
Context-aware conversations: Multi-turn conversations with persistent history and comprehensive conversation management
Source verification: Always cites sources so users can verify facts on the spot
Use Cases
Enterprise Knowledge Management: Non-technical teams (marketing, HR, legal, customer support) deploying knowledge bases in minutes
Healthcare & Pharma: Althaia Hospitals medical protocol search for 5,000+ healthcare professionals with HIPAA-grade security needs
Financial Services: BrokerChooser replaced keyword search with generative AI for significant conversion increases
Education: Columbia Business School and Barry University for academic knowledge discovery and institutional knowledge management
Engineering & Research: NAFEMS knowledge discovery across thousands of technical publications for international membership
Trade Organizations: CCOO (Spain's largest union) serving 1M+ members with knowledge retrieval platform
Dynamic Knowledge Management: Continuous updates, gap identification, and automatic documentation generation
Developer RAG Backend: API-first infrastructure for building custom AI applications with Prompt Lab experimentation
Custom chatbot backends: Ideal for developers building custom chat interfaces needing simple RAG API without heavy platform overhead
Self-hosted knowledge retrieval: Perfect for organizations requiring data sovereignty with Supabase infrastructure for compliance (GDPR, HIPAA when self-hosted)
Budget-conscious RAG applications: Startups and small teams minimizing costs with MIT open-source license and affordable hosted plans ($190-$1,490/year)
Supabase-native projects: Teams already using Supabase can integrate Supavec seamlessly without additional infrastructure complexity
Developer-first RAG: Code-first teams wanting full control over RAG implementation, eschewing GUI dashboards for API-driven workflows
Not ideal for: Non-technical users requiring no-code interfaces, enterprises needing advanced RAG features (hybrid search, reranking), or teams requiring built-in analytics/monitoring
Not ideal for: Production applications requiring hallucination detection, citation validation, or confidence scoring without custom development
Customer support automation: AI assistants handling common queries, reducing support ticket volume, providing 24/7 instant responses with source citations
Internal knowledge management: Employee self-service for HR policies, technical documentation, onboarding materials, company procedures across 1,400+ file formats
Sales enablement: Product information chatbots, lead qualification, customer education with white-labeled widgets on websites and apps
Documentation assistance: Technical docs, help centers, FAQs with automatic website crawling and sitemap indexing
Educational platforms: Course materials, research assistance, student support with multimedia content (YouTube transcriptions, podcasts)
Healthcare information: Patient education, medical knowledge bases (SOC 2 Type II compliant for sensitive data)
E-commerce: Product recommendations, order assistance, customer inquiries with API integration to 5,000+ apps via Zapier
SaaS onboarding: User guides, feature explanations, troubleshooting with multi-agent support for different teams
Security & Compliance
SOC2 Type 2: Annually audited for enterprise security assurance
ISO 27001: Annually audited information security management certification
GDPR Compliant: Built-in PII anonymization automatically detects and removes personal data
Encryption: AES-256 at rest, TLS in transit for comprehensive data protection
AI Risk Classification: Low to minimal AI risk category with policy-as-code guardrails
Human-in-the-Loop: Validation options for critical workflows requiring human oversight
Tenant Isolation: Customer data separation ensures multi-tenant security with isolated Knowledge Boxes
Audit Logs: Standard across all pricing tiers for compliance tracking and security monitoring
API Key Management: Temporal keys and rotation for security hygiene
CRITICAL LIMITATION: NO HIPAA certification documented - healthcare organizations processing PHI must contact sales for compliance clarification
Data Governance: Enterprise tier supports complete on-premise deployment for 100% data control and sovereignty
Self-hosting advantage: MIT license enables complete data sovereignty - all data stays on your servers for strict compliance requirements
[Privacy note]
Supabase security foundation: Row-level security (RLS) fences off each team's data when using hosted Supavec on Supabase infrastructure
No model training: Your documents never used for LLM training - data remains yours with zero retention by OpenAI or other providers
GDPR/HIPAA ready: Self-hosting enables GDPR and HIPAA compliance when deployed on compliant infrastructure - enterprises can go dedicated or on-premises
Encryption: Standard HTTPS encryption for API calls; at-rest encryption depends on hosting infrastructure (Supabase provides AES-256)
Note: No SOC 2 certification: Open-source project lacks formal SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, or other enterprise compliance certifications for hosted plans
Note: No built-in access controls: Authentication, authorization, and RBAC must be implemented by developers in their application layer
Note: Limited hosted security features: Hosted plans lack SSO/SAML, IP whitelisting, or advanced security controls without custom configuration
Encryption: SSL/TLS for data in transit, 256-bit AES encryption for data at rest
SOC 2 Type II certification: Industry-leading security standards with regular third-party audits
Security Certifications
GDPR compliance: Full compliance with European data protection regulations, ensuring data privacy and user rights
Access controls: Role-based access control (RBAC), two-factor authentication (2FA), SSO integration for enterprise security
Data isolation: Customer data stays isolated and private - platform never trains on user data
Domain allowlisting: Ensures chatbot appears only on approved sites for security and brand protection
Secure deployments: ChatGPT Plugin support for private use cases with controlled access
Pricing & Plans
Fly Tier: $700/month - 10GB/15K resources, 750MB max file, 1 Knowledge Box, cloud only, 10K tokens/month included
Scaling Consideration: Token-based consumption pricing requires careful usage forecasting for budget predictability beyond included tier
Best Value For: Organizations wanting to control costs through usage optimization vs fixed seat-based or per-project pricing models
Open-source (Free): MIT-licensed for self-hosting - pay only your infrastructure costs (Supabase, server, storage) with unlimited API calls and no vendor fees
Hosted Free tier: 100 API calls per month for development and testing
[Pricing]
Basic Plan: $190/year ($15.83/month equivalent) - 750 API calls per month, hosted infrastructure, automatic backups, email support
Enterprise Plan: $1,490/year ($124.17/month equivalent) - 5,000 API calls per month, priority support, SLA guarantees, dedicated resources
No per-document charges: Storage not metered separately - only query volume counts toward plan limits
No user seat fees: Pricing based purely on API call volume, not team size or number of developers
Need more calls? Negotiate custom limits with hosted provider or self-host to eliminate caps entirely
Value proposition: 40-90% cheaper than commercial RAG platforms - Basic plan costs less than 1 month of competing platforms while providing annual service
Standard Plan: $99/month or $89/month annual - 10 custom chatbots, 5,000 items per chatbot, 60 million words per bot, basic helpdesk support, standard security
View Pricing
Premium Plan: $499/month or $449/month annual - 100 custom chatbots, 20,000 items per chatbot, 300 million words per bot, advanced support, enhanced security, additional customization
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing - Comprehensive AI solutions, highest security and compliance, dedicated account managers, custom SSO, token authentication, priority support with faster SLAs
Enterprise Solutions
7-Day Free Trial: Full access to Standard features without charges - available to all users
Annual billing discount: Save 10% by paying upfront annually ($89/mo Standard, $449/mo Premium)
Flat monthly rates: No per-query charges, no hidden costs for API access or white-labeling (included in all plans)
Managed infrastructure: Auto-scaling cloud infrastructure included - no additional hosting or scaling fees
Active community: User community plus 5,000+ app integrations through Zapier ecosystem
Regular updates: Platform stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements automatically
Limitations & Considerations
NO HIPAA Certification Documented: Healthcare organizations processing PHI must contact sales - major compliance gap vs competitors with documented HIPAA
NO Native Messaging Channels: No Slack, WhatsApp, Telegram, or Microsoft Teams integrations - requires custom API-based development
Documentation Fragmentation: Dual portals (docs.rag.progress.cloud + docs.nuclia.dev) during Progress acquisition transition may cause confusion
Recent Acquisition Risk: June 2025 Progress purchase means platform still maturing under new ownership with potential direction changes
Scalability Concerns: Multiple problems limit scalability - hard to scale nodes up/down, write operations affect concurrent search performance
NO Dropbox Integration: Missing Dropbox connector vs competitors - limits cloud storage sync options
NO Notion Integration: Missing Notion connector - gap for knowledge management workflows
NO YouTube Transcript Extraction: Not explicitly documented vs competitors with video indexing features
Missing Features: NO lead capture, NO human handoff/escalation workflows, NO proactive alerting (monitoring exists, alerting undocumented)
Learning Curve: 30+ RAG parameters and Prompt Lab may feel technical for non-developer teams despite no-code dashboard
Best For: Development teams and technical users - powerful for experts but may overwhelm business users wanting simple deployment
No GUI/dashboard: Everything via API or CLI - no business-user interface for content management, analytics, or configuration
Developer-only tool: Requires coding skills for setup, integration, and maintenance - non-technical teams cannot use without developer support
Basic RAG only: Standard retrieval-augmented generation without advanced features like hybrid search, query reranking, multi-query fusion, or query expansion
No observability built-in: No metrics dashboard, conversation analytics, or performance monitoring - must wire up your own logging layer
Manual hallucination handling: No built-in citation validation, confidence scoring, or factual consistency checks - developers must implement safeguards
Limited connectors: No one-click Google Drive, Notion, or cloud storage integrations - must script data fetching and API uploads manually
No conversation management: Stateless API calls without chat history, multi-turn context, or session management - build conversation layer yourself
Infrastructure knowledge required: Self-hosting requires Supabase, Postgres, and vector database expertise - not plug-and-play for non-DevOps teams
Minimal abstraction: Intentionally low-level API design provides control but requires more integration work than higher-level RAG platforms
Managed service approach: Less control over underlying RAG pipeline configuration compared to build-your-own solutions like LangChain
Vendor lock-in: Proprietary platform - migration to alternative RAG solutions requires rebuilding knowledge bases
Model selection: Limited to OpenAI (GPT-5.1 and 4 series) and Anthropic (Claude, opus and sonnet 4.5) - no support for other LLM providers (Cohere, AI21, open-source models)
Pricing at scale: Flat-rate pricing may become expensive for very high-volume use cases (millions of queries/month) compared to pay-per-use models
Customization limits: While highly configurable, some advanced RAG techniques (custom reranking, hybrid search strategies) may not be exposed
Language support: Supports 90+ languages but performance may vary for less common languages or specialized domains
Real-time data: Knowledge bases require re-indexing for updates - not ideal for real-time data requirements (stock prices, live inventory)
Enterprise features: Some advanced features (custom SSO, token authentication) only available on Enterprise plan with custom pricing
After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both Progress Agentic RAG and Supavec are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.
When to Choose Progress Agentic RAG
You value proprietary remi v2 model (30x faster inference) addresses hallucination problem with continuous quality monitoring - differentiated capability absent from most competitors
Open-source NucliaDB transparency (710+ GitHub stars) with managed infrastructure removes operational burden while maintaining technical visibility
Genuine no-code accessibility: business users (marketing, HR, legal, support) can deploy functional RAG pipelines in minutes via visual dashboard
Best For: Proprietary REMi v2 model (30x faster inference) addresses hallucination problem with continuous quality monitoring - differentiated capability absent from most competitors
When to Choose Supavec
You value 100% open source with no vendor lock-in
Complete control over data and infrastructure
Strong privacy with Supabase RLS integration
Best For: 100% open source with no vendor lock-in
Migration & Switching Considerations
Switching between Progress Agentic RAG and Supavec requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.
Pricing Comparison Summary
Progress Agentic RAG starts at $700/month, while Supavec begins at custom pricing. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.
Our Recommendation Process
Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality
For most organizations, the decision between Progress Agentic RAG and Supavec comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.
📚 Next Steps
Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.
• Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
• Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
• Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
• Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements
Last updated: December 11, 2025 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.
The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.
DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.
People Also Compare
Explore more AI tool comparisons to find the perfect solution for your needs
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...