CODY AI vs Pyx

Make an informed decision with our comprehensive comparison. Discover which RAG solution perfectly fits your needs.

Priyansh Khodiyar's avatar
Priyansh KhodiyarDevRel at CustomGPT.ai

Fact checked and reviewed by Bill Cava

Published: 01.04.2025Updated: 25.04.2025

In this comprehensive guide, we compare CODY AI and Pyx across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.

Overview

When choosing between CODY AI and Pyx, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.

Quick Decision Guide

  • Choose CODY AI if: you value true rag architecture with pinecone vector database and configurable retrieval parameters (relevance score, token distribution, focus mode)
  • Choose Pyx if: you value very quick setup (30-60 minutes)

About CODY AI

CODY AI Landing Page Screenshot

CODY AI is business-focused no-code rag platform with source attribution. Business-focused RAG-as-a-Service platform enabling no-code AI assistant creation trained on custom knowledge bases. Acquired by Just Build It (May 2024), claims 100,000+ businesses as customers. TRUE RAG platform with Pinecone vector database, multi-LLM support (GPT-4, Claude 3.5, Gemini 1.5, Llama 3.1 on Enterprise), and comprehensive REST API. Differentiators: source attribution with every response, Focus Mode (inject 1,000 docs into context), 15-minute bot deployment. Critical gaps: NO direct SOC 2 certification (infrastructure partners only), NO official SDKs, NO native cloud storage integrations. $0-$249/month credit-based pricing. Founded in 2022, headquartered in United States, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.

Overall Rating
85/100
Starting Price
$29/mo

About Pyx

Pyx Landing Page Screenshot

Pyx is find. don't search.. Pyx AI is an enterprise conversational search tool that leverages Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to deliver real-time answers from company data. It continuously synchronizes with data sources and enables natural language queries across unstructured documents without keywords or pre-sorting. Founded in 2022, headquartered in Europe, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.

Overall Rating
83/100
Starting Price
$30/mo

Key Differences at a Glance

In terms of user ratings, both platforms score similarly in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, pricing is comparable. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: AI Chatbot versus AI Search. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.

⚠️ What This Comparison Covers

We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.

Detailed Feature Comparison

logo of cody
CODY AI
logo of pyx
Pyx
logo of customGPT logo
CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
  • Supported formats – PDF, Word, PowerPoint, plain text up to 100MB per file
  • Website crawler – Import up to 25,000 pages with auto re-imports (Premium/Advanced)
  • Document capacity – Free (100), Basic (1K), Premium (10K), Advanced (50K total)
  • Storage – Amazon S3 SSE-S3 encryption, Pinecone vector database (SOC 2 Type II)
  • ⚠️ NO YouTube/cloud integrations – No video transcripts, requires Zapier for Drive/Dropbox/Notion
  • ✅ Auto-Indexing – Points at files, indexes unstructured data automatically without manual setup
  • ✅ Auto-Sync – Connected repositories sync automatically, document changes reflected almost instantly
  • File Formats – Supports PDF, DOCX, PPT, TXT and common enterprise formats
  • ⚠️ Limited Scope – No website crawling or YouTube ingestion, narrower than CustomGPT
  • Enterprise Scale – Handles large corporate data sets, exact limits not published
  • 1,400+ file formats – PDF, DOCX, Excel, PowerPoint, Markdown, HTML + auto-extraction from ZIP/RAR/7Z archives
  • Website crawling – Sitemap indexing with configurable depth for help docs, FAQs, and public content
  • Multimedia transcription – AI Vision, OCR, YouTube/Vimeo/podcast speech-to-text built-in
  • Cloud integrations – Google Drive, SharePoint, OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion with auto-sync
  • Knowledge platforms – Zendesk, Freshdesk, HubSpot, Confluence, Shopify connectors
  • Massive scale – 60M words (Standard) / 300M words (Premium) per bot with no performance degradation
Integrations & Channels
  • Native Slack/Discord – Free for all users with /assign-bot command and @mentions
  • Zapier integration – 5,000+ apps including Telegram, Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp
  • REST API v1.0 – Full API access on all paid plans at developers.meetcody.ai
  • ⚠️ NO Teams/webhooks – Requires Zapier for Microsoft Teams, no event-driven notifications
  • ⚠️ Standalone Only – Own chat/search interface, not a "deploy everywhere" platform
  • ⚠️ No External Channels – No Slack bot, Zapier connector, or public API
  • Web/Desktop UI – Users interact through Pyx's interface, minimal third-party chat synergy
  • Custom Integration – Deeper integrations require custom dev work or future updates
  • Website embedding – Lightweight JS widget or iframe with customizable positioning
  • CMS plugins – WordPress, WIX, Webflow, Framer, SquareSpace native support
  • 5,000+ app ecosystem – Zapier connects CRMs, marketing, e-commerce tools
  • MCP Server – Integrate with Claude Desktop, Cursor, ChatGPT, Windsurf
  • OpenAI SDK compatible – Drop-in replacement for OpenAI API endpoints
  • LiveChat + Slack – Native chat widgets with human handoff capabilities
Native Slack & Discord Integration ( Differentiator)
  • ✅ Free on all plans – Native Slack/Discord integrations even on Free tier
  • /assign-bot command – Dedicate bots to channels for departmental organization
  • Context preservation – History maintained in threads for multi-turn interactions
  • Competitive advantage – Zero-friction vs API integrations (7.5/10 differentiator)
N/A
N/A
Source Attribution & Transparency ( Core Differentiator)
  • ✅ Automatic citation – Every response includes links to exact documents used for verification
  • Source verification interface – Centralized logs show which documents informed each response for audits
  • Trust building – Users validate AI answers against sources reducing hallucination concerns
  • Compliance advantage – Source traceability supports explainable AI requirements in regulated industries (9/10 differentiator)
N/A
N/A
Focus Mode ( Core Differentiator)
  • ✅ Targeted context injection – Inject up to 1,000 specific documents into conversation context
  • Use cases – Department-specific queries, project-scoped assistance, client-specific information isolation
  • Noise reduction – Constrains retrieval to relevant subset preventing irrelevant information interference
  • Performance advantage – Smaller search space improves retrieval speed and relevance (8.5/10 differentiator)
N/A
N/A
Core Chatbot Features
  • Multilingual support – Build and interact in any language
  • Conversation memory – Configurable token distribution (70% context, 10% history, 20% response)
  • History retention – 14 days (Basic), 30 days (Premium), 90 days (Advanced)
  • ⚠️ NO lead capture/handoff – Requires API/Zapier, prompt-based escalation
  • Conversational Search – Context-aware Q&A over enterprise documents with follow-up questions
  • ⚠️ Internal Focus – Designed for knowledge management, no lead capture or human handoff
  • Multi-Language – Likely supports multiple languages, though not a headline feature
  • ⚠️ Basic Analytics – Stores chat history, fewer business insights than customer-facing tools
  • ✅ #1 accuracy – Median 5/5 in independent benchmarks, 10% lower hallucination than OpenAI
  • ✅ Source citations – Every response includes clickable links to original documents
  • ✅ 93% resolution rate – Handles queries autonomously, reducing human workload
  • ✅ 92 languages – Native multilingual support without per-language config
  • ✅ Lead capture – Built-in email collection, custom forms, real-time notifications
  • ✅ Human handoff – Escalation with full conversation context preserved
Widget Customization & White- Labeling
  • Header & chat styling – Layout, logo, colors, message bubbles, avatars customization
  • Launcher config – Size, position (left/right/bottom), color, custom icons
  • White-labeling – Complete branding removal requires Premium ($99) or Advanced ($249)
  • ⚠️ NO domain restrictions – Cannot limit widget usage to specific domains
N/A
N/A
L L M Model Options
  • Basic plan – GPT-3.5 Turbo only (1 credit per query)
  • Premium/Advanced – GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-3.5 16K (5 credits), GPT-4 (10 credits), Claude Sonnet
  • Enterprise – 6 providers: Llama 3.1, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5, Mixtral-8x7B
  • ⚠️ NO automatic routing – Manual selection only, credit-based transparent pricing
  • ⚠️ Undisclosed Model – Likely GPT-3.5/GPT-4 but exact model not publicly documented
  • ⚠️ No Model Selection – Cannot switch LLMs or configure speed vs accuracy tradeoffs
  • ⚠️ Single Configuration – Every query uses same model, no toggles or fine-tuning
  • Closed Architecture – Model details, context window, capabilities hidden from users intentionally
  • GPT-5.1 models – Latest thinking models (Optimal & Smart variants)
  • GPT-4 series – GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-4o available
  • Claude 4.5 – Anthropic's Opus available for Enterprise
  • Auto model routing – Balances cost/performance automatically
  • Zero API key management – All models managed behind the scenes
Developer Experience ( A P I & S D Ks)
  • REST API v1.0 – Bearer token auth, comprehensive endpoints (updated May 2024)
  • Messages/Documents endpoints – SSE streaming, file upload (100MB), webpage import
  • Rate limiting – Standard headers (x-ratelimit-limit, -remaining, -reset)
  • ⚠️ NO SDKs/limited docs – Direct REST calls required, lacks tutorials/samples
  • ⚠️ No API – No open API or SDKs, everything through Pyx interface
  • ⚠️ No Embedding – Cannot integrate into other apps or call programmatically
  • Closed Ecosystem – No GitHub examples, community plug-ins, or extensibility options
  • Turnkey Only – Great for ready-made tool, limits deep customization or extensions
  • REST API – Full-featured for agents, projects, data ingestion, chat queries
  • Python SDK – Open-source customgpt-client with full API coverage
  • Postman collections – Pre-built requests for rapid prototyping
  • Webhooks – Real-time event notifications for conversations and leads
  • OpenAI compatible – Use existing OpenAI SDK code with minimal changes
R A G Implementation & Accuracy
  • ✅ TRUE RAG architecture – Pinecone vector database (SOC 2 Type II) with Amazon S3 storage
  • Dynamic chunking – Algorithm adjusts chunk size based on token distribution for optimal retrieval
  • Relevance Score configuration – Adjustable trade-off between accuracy and completeness
  • Reverse Vector Search – Proprietary technique merging AI and user responses for improved relevance
  • ⚠️ NO published benchmarks – No quantitative accuracy metrics or validation vs competitors
N/A
N/A
Performance & Accuracy
  • Response time – Sub-500ms target for queries on Premium/Advanced with GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • User reviews – G2 4.7/5 (150+ reviews), Capterra 4.8/5 (50+ reviews)
  • Scalability – AWS infrastructure with isolated Kubernetes containers (Enterprise)
  • ⚠️ NO public SLA – No uptime guarantees except Enterprise (requires sales)
  • Real-Time Answers – Serves accurate responses from internal documents, sparse public benchmarks
  • Auto-Sync Freshness – Connected repositories keep retrieval context always current automatically
  • ⚠️ Limited Transparency – No anti-hallucination metrics or advanced re-ranking details published
  • Competitive RAG – Likely comparable to standard GPT-based systems on relevance control
  • Sub-second responses – Optimized RAG with vector search and multi-layer caching
  • Benchmark-proven – 13% higher accuracy, 34% faster than OpenAI Assistants API
  • Anti-hallucination tech – Responses grounded only in your provided content
  • OpenGraph citations – Rich visual cards with titles, descriptions, images
  • 99.9% uptime – Auto-scaling infrastructure handles traffic spikes
No- Code Interface & Usability
  • ✅ 15-minute deployment – Three-step: add data, define purpose, test and share
  • 11+ templates – Marketing, HR, IT Support, Sales, Training, Translator
  • Visual prompt builder – Variables, template sharing, intuitive UI
  • User ratings – G2 4.7/5, Capterra 4.8/5; easy setup, learning curve for customization
  • ⚠️ NO flow builder – Prompt-based only, no drag-and-drop designer
  • ✅ Straightforward UI – Users log in, ask questions, get answers without coding
  • ✅ No-Code Admin – Admins connect data sources, Pyx indexes automatically
  • Minimal Customization – UI stays consistent and uncluttered by design
  • Internal Q&A Hub – Perfect for employee use, not external embedding or branding
  • 2-minute deployment – Fastest time-to-value in the industry
  • Wizard interface – Step-by-step with visual previews
  • Drag-and-drop – Upload files, paste URLs, connect cloud storage
  • In-browser testing – Test before deploying to production
  • Zero learning curve – Productive on day one
Security & Privacy
  • ⚠️ CODY NOT SOC 2 certified – Early stage startup, infrastructure partners certified
  • Infrastructure compliance – Pinecone (SOC 2 Type II), AWS S3 (PCI-DSS, HIPAA, FedRAMP)
  • GDPR & encryption – AWS EU regions, SSE-S3 at rest, TLS in transit
  • AI training policy – Customer data NOT used for training, OpenAI retains max 30 days
  • ✅ GDPR Compliance – Germany-based, implicit EU data protection and regional sovereignty
  • ✅ Enterprise Privacy – Data isolated per customer, encrypted in transit and rest
  • ✅ No Model Training – Customer data not used for external LLM training
  • ✅ Role-Based Access – Built-in controls, admins set document visibility per role
  • ⚠️ Limited Certifications – On-prem or SOC 2/ISO 27001/HIPAA not publicly documented
  • SOC 2 Type II + GDPR – Third-party audited compliance
  • Encryption – 256-bit AES at rest, SSL/TLS in transit
  • Access controls – RBAC, 2FA, SSO, domain allowlisting
  • Data isolation – Never trains on your data
Observability & Monitoring
  • Conversation logs – Centralized view with search, filtering by bot/date
  • Source verification – Click-through to examine documents used for auditing
  • Retention – 14 days (Basic), 30 days (Premium), 90 days (Advanced)
  • ⚠️ NO alerting/analytics – No real-time alerts, error rates, or funnel tracking
  • Basic Stats – User activity, query counts, top-referenced documents for admins
  • ⚠️ No Deep Analytics – No conversation analytics dashboards or real-time logging
  • Adoption Tracking – Useful for usage monitoring, lighter insights than full suites
  • Set-and-Forget – Minimal monitoring overhead, contact support for issues
  • Real-time dashboard – Query volumes, token usage, response times
  • Customer Intelligence – User behavior patterns, popular queries, knowledge gaps
  • Conversation analytics – Full transcripts, resolution rates, common questions
  • Export capabilities – API export to BI tools and data warehouses
Proprietary R A G Optimizations ( Differentiator)
  • Scratchpad – Save, refine, use derivatives of AI responses for micro-management and iterative enhancement
  • Template Mode – Pre-defined prompts with variables for consistent behavior across conversations
  • Reverse Vector Search – Proprietary technique merging AI and user responses for improved relevance
  • Persist Prompt – Continuous re-emphasis of system prompt preventing instruction drift in long conversations
N/A
N/A
Pricing & Scalability
  • Free – $0/month: 100 credits, 100 docs, 1 member, NO API/crawler
  • Basic – $29/month: 2,500 credits, 1K docs, 3 members, API, GPT-3.5 only
  • Premium – $99/month: 10K credits, 10K docs, 10 members, crawler, white-labeling
  • Advanced – $249/month: 25K credits, 50K docs total, 30 members, 90-day logs
  • Enterprise – Custom: Unlimited credits, SLA, dedicated infrastructure, 6 LLM providers
  • Seat-Based Pricing – ~$30 per user per month, predictable monthly costs
  • ✅ Cost-Effective Small Teams – Affordable for teams under 50 users
  • ⚠️ Large Team Costs – 100 users = $3,000/month, can scale expensively
  • Unlimited Content – Document/token limits not published, gated only by user seats
  • Free Trial + Enterprise – Hands-on trial available, custom pricing for large deployments
  • Standard: $99/mo – 60M words, 10 bots
  • Premium: $449/mo – 300M words, 100 bots
  • Auto-scaling – Managed cloud scales with demand
  • Flat rates – No per-query charges
Support & Ecosystem
  • API docs – developers.meetcody.ai with endpoint reference, curl examples
  • Help Center – intercom.help/cody/en/ with guides, compliance, security bulletins
  • Active Discord – Peer support for troubleshooting and best practices
  • ⚠️ NO phone/live chat – Email and community only; Advanced gets account manager
  • ✅ Direct Support – Email, phone, chat with hands-on onboarding approach
  • ⚠️ No Open Community – Closed solution, no plug-ins or user-built extensions
  • Internal Roadmap – Product updates from Pyx only, no community marketplace
  • Quick Setup Focus – Emphasizes minimal admin overhead for internal knowledge search
  • Comprehensive docs – Tutorials, cookbooks, API references
  • Email + in-app support – Under 24hr response time
  • Premium support – Dedicated account managers for Premium/Enterprise
  • Open-source SDK – Python SDK, Postman, GitHub examples
  • 5,000+ Zapier apps – CRMs, e-commerce, marketing integrations
R A G-as-a- Service Assessment
  • ✅ TRUE RAG platform – Pinecone vector database, dynamic chunking, configurable retrieval parameters
  • Target audience – Business teams needing no-code deployment vs developer-centric platforms
  • Differentiators – Source attribution, Focus Mode, native Slack/Discord integrations
  • Enterprise considerations – Lack of direct SOC 2 may block regulated industry adoption
  • ⚠️ NOT TRUE RAG-AS-A-SERVICE – Standalone internal app, not API-accessible RAG platform
  • Turnkey Application – Self-contained Q&A tool vs developer-accessible RAG infrastructure
  • ⚠️ No API Access – No REST API, SDKs, programmatic access unlike CustomGPT/Vectara
  • Closed Application – Web/desktop interface only, cannot build custom applications on top
  • SaaS vs RaaS – Software-as-a-Service (standalone app) NOT Retrieval-as-a-Service (API infrastructure)
  • Best Comparison Category – Internal search tools (Glean, Guru), not developer RAG platforms
  • Platform type – TRUE RAG-AS-A-SERVICE with managed infrastructure
  • API-first – REST API, Python SDK, OpenAI compatibility, MCP Server
  • No-code option – 2-minute wizard deployment for non-developers
  • Hybrid positioning – Serves both dev teams (APIs) and business users (no-code)
  • Enterprise ready – SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, WCAG 2.0, flat-rate pricing
Competitive Positioning
  • vs CustomGPT – Cody excels in no-code and source attribution; CustomGPT excels in SOC 2 and SDKs
  • vs Vectara – Cody offers simpler pricing and no-code; Vectara provides enterprise-grade benchmarks
  • vs ChatBase/SiteGPT – Cody provides TRUE RAG architecture vs simpler chatbot platforms
  • Market niche – Business-focused RAG for no-code deployment with source transparency
  • Market Position – Turnkey internal knowledge search (Germany), not embeddable chatbot platform
  • Target Customers – Small-mid European teams needing GDPR compliance and simple deployment
  • Key Competitors – Glean, Guru, Notion AI; not customer-facing chatbots like CustomGPT
  • ✅ Advantages – Simple scope, auto-sync, GDPR compliance, ~$30/user/month predictable pricing
  • ⚠️ Use Case Fit – Perfect for <50 user teams, not API integrations or public chatbots
  • Market position – Leading RAG platform balancing enterprise accuracy with no-code usability. Trusted by 6,000+ orgs including Adobe, MIT, Dropbox.
  • Key differentiators – #1 benchmarked accuracy • 1,400+ formats • Full white-labeling included • Flat-rate pricing
  • vs OpenAI – 10% lower hallucination, 13% higher accuracy, 34% faster
  • vs Botsonic/Chatbase – More file formats, source citations, no hidden costs
  • vs LangChain – Production-ready in 2 min vs weeks of development
Use Cases
  • Primary departments – Marketing, HR, IT support, Sales with AI-powered assistance
  • Internal operations – FAQs, training, report generation, document search (1000s files)
  • Code assistance – Engineers save 5-6 hours/week, write code 2x faster
  • Industries – Financial (4/6 top US banks), tech (7/10 top), healthcare, government (15+ agencies)
  • ✅ Internal Knowledge Search – Employees asking questions about company documents and policies
  • ✅ Team Onboarding – New hires finding information without bothering colleagues
  • ✅ Policy Lookup – HR, compliance, operational procedure retrieval for staff
  • ✅ Small European Teams – GDPR-compliant internal search with EU data residency
  • ⚠️ NOT SUITABLE FOR – Public chatbots, customer support, API integrations, multi-channel deployment
  • Customer support – 24/7 AI handling common queries with citations
  • Internal knowledge – HR policies, onboarding, technical docs
  • Sales enablement – Product info, lead qualification, education
  • Documentation – Help centers, FAQs with auto-crawling
  • E-commerce – Product recommendations, order assistance
A I Models
  • Multi-LLM support – GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-3.5 16K, GPT-4, Claude Sonnet (paid tiers)
  • Enterprise (6 providers) – Llama 3.1, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5, Mixtral-8x7B
  • Model-agnostic – Stay current with latest LLM updates without retraining
  • ⚠️ NO automatic routing – Manual model selection, no cost/complexity optimization
  • ⚠️ Undisclosed LLM – Likely GPT-3.5/GPT-4 but model details not publicly documented
  • ⚠️ No Model Selection – Cannot switch LLMs or choose speed vs accuracy configurations
  • ⚠️ Opaque Architecture – Context window size and capabilities not exposed to users
  • Simplicity Focus – Hides technical complexity, users ask questions and get answers
  • ⚠️ No Fine-Tuning – Cannot customize model on domain data for specialized responses
  • OpenAI – GPT-5.1 (Optimal/Smart), GPT-4 series
  • Anthropic – Claude 4.5 Opus/Sonnet (Enterprise)
  • Auto-routing – Intelligent model selection for cost/performance
  • Managed – No API keys or fine-tuning required
R A G Capabilities
  • ✅ Pinecone vector database – SOC 2 Type II certified, Amazon S3 storage (SSE-S3)
  • Dynamic chunking – Adjusts chunk size based on token distribution for optimal retrieval
  • Token distribution – Split between context, history, response (70%/10%/20%)
  • Context window – Claude 2 integration provides up to 100K tokens
  • Conversational RAG – Context-aware search over enterprise documents with follow-up support
  • ✅ Auto-Sync – Repositories sync automatically, changes reflected almost instantly
  • Document Formats – PDF, DOCX, PPT, TXT and common enterprise formats supported
  • ⚠️ No Advanced Controls – Chunking, embedding models, similarity thresholds not exposed
  • ⚠️ Limited Transparency – No citation metrics or anti-hallucination details published
  • Closed System – Optimized for internal Q&A, limited visibility into retrieval architecture
  • GPT-4 + RAG – Outperforms OpenAI in independent benchmarks
  • Anti-hallucination – Responses grounded in your content only
  • Automatic citations – Clickable source links in every response
  • Sub-second latency – Optimized vector search and caching
  • Scale to 300M words – No performance degradation at scale
Customization & Flexibility ( Behavior & Knowledge)
  • Real-time knowledge updates – Manual retraining available for immediate updates
  • Focus Mode – Inject up to 1,000 specific documents for targeted context
  • Bot personality – Adjust behavior, tone, focus with custom starters
  • ⚠️ NO programmatic personality – Dashboard-only, cannot modify per-user or via API
  • ✅ Auto-Sync Updates – Knowledge base updated without manual uploads or scheduling
  • ⚠️ No Persona Controls – AI voice stays neutral, no tone or behavior customization
  • ✅ Access Controls – Strong role-based permissions, admins set document visibility per user
  • Closed Environment – Great for content updates, limited for AI behavior or deployment
  • Live content updates – Add/remove content with automatic re-indexing
  • System prompts – Shape agent behavior and voice through instructions
  • Multi-agent support – Different bots for different teams
  • Smart defaults – No ML expertise required for custom behavior
Limitations & Considerations
  • Learning curve – Easy setup but customization requires expertise for specific needs
  • Accuracy data-dependent – Response quality relies heavily on knowledge base quality
  • Complex coding challenges – Struggles with deeper logic, scalability, multi-step coding
  • ⚠️ NO YouTube/cloud integrations – No video transcripts, Google Drive/Dropbox/Notion need Zapier
  • Performance with large data – Speed may slow with large datasets on lower-end systems
  • ⚠️ No Public API – Cannot embed or call programmatically, standalone UI only
  • ⚠️ No Messaging Integrations – No Slack, Teams, WhatsApp or chat platform connectors
  • ⚠️ Limited Branding – Minimal customization, not white-label solution for public deployment
  • ⚠️ No Advanced Controls – Cannot configure RAG parameters, model selection, retrieval strategies
  • ⚠️ Seat-Based Scaling – Expensive for large orgs vs usage-based pricing models
  • ✅ Best For – Small European teams (<50 users) prioritizing simplicity and GDPR over flexibility
  • Managed service – Less control over RAG pipeline vs build-your-own
  • Model selection – OpenAI + Anthropic only; no Cohere, AI21, open-source
  • Real-time data – Requires re-indexing; not ideal for live inventory/prices
  • Enterprise features – Custom SSO only on Enterprise plan
Customization & Branding
N/A
  • ⚠️ Minimal Branding – Logo/color tweaks only, designed as internal tool not white-label
  • ⚠️ No Embedding – Standalone interface, no domain-embed or widget options available
  • Pyx UI Only – Look stays "Pyx AI" by design, public branding not supported
  • Security Focus – Emphasis on user management and access controls over theming
  • Full white-labeling included – Colors, logos, CSS, custom domains at no extra cost
  • 2-minute setup – No-code wizard with drag-and-drop interface
  • Persona customization – Control AI personality, tone, response style via pre-prompts
  • Visual theme editor – Real-time preview of branding changes
  • Domain allowlisting – Restrict embedding to approved sites only
Additional Considerations
N/A
  • ✅ No-Fuss Internal Search – Employees use without coding, simple deployment for teams
  • ⚠️ Not Public-Facing – Not ideal for customer chatbots or developer-heavy customization
  • Siloed Environment – Single AI search environment, not broad extensible platform
  • Simpler Scope – Less flexible than CustomGPT, but faster setup for internal use
  • Time-to-value – 2-minute deployment vs weeks with DIY
  • Always current – Auto-updates to latest GPT models
  • Proven scale – 6,000+ organizations, millions of queries
  • Multi-LLM – OpenAI + Claude reduces vendor lock-in
Security & Compliance
N/A
  • ✅ GDPR Compliance – Germany-based with implicit EU data protection compliance
  • ✅ German Data Residency – EU storage location for regional data sovereignty requirements
  • ✅ Enterprise Privacy – Customer data isolated, encrypted in transit and at rest
  • ✅ Role-Based Access – Built-in controls, admins set document visibility per user
  • ⚠️ Limited Certifications – SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA not publicly documented
  • SOC 2 Type II + GDPR – Regular third-party audits, full EU compliance
  • 256-bit AES encryption – Data at rest; SSL/TLS in transit
  • SSO + 2FA + RBAC – Enterprise access controls with role-based permissions
  • Data isolation – Never trains on customer data
  • Domain allowlisting – Restrict chatbot to approved domains
Pricing & Plans
N/A
  • Seat-Based Pricing – ~$30 per user per month
  • ✅ Small Team Value – Affordable for teams under 50 users, predictable costs
  • ⚠️ Scalability Cost – 100 users = $3,000/month, expensive for large organizations
  • Unlimited Content – No published document limits, gated only by user seats
  • Free Trial + Enterprise – Evaluation available, custom pricing for volume discounts
  • Standard: $99/mo – 10 chatbots, 60M words, 5K items/bot
  • Premium: $449/mo – 100 chatbots, 300M words, 20K items/bot
  • Enterprise: Custom – SSO, dedicated support, custom SLAs
  • 7-day free trial – Full Standard access, no charges
  • Flat-rate pricing – No per-query charges, no hidden costs
Support & Documentation
N/A
  • ✅ Direct Support – Email, phone, chat with hands-on onboarding approach
  • ✅ Quick Deployment – Minimal admin overhead, connect sources and start asking questions
  • ⚠️ No Open Community – Closed solution, no plug-ins or user extensions
  • ⚠️ No Developer Docs – No API documentation or programmatic access guides
  • Internal Roadmap – Updates from Pyx only, no user-contributed features
  • Documentation hub – Docs, tutorials, API references
  • Support channels – Email, in-app chat, dedicated managers (Premium+)
  • Open-source – Python SDK, Postman, GitHub examples
  • Community – User community + 5,000 Zapier integrations
Core Agent Features
N/A
  • ⚠️ NO Agent Capabilities – No autonomous agents, tool calling, or multi-agent orchestration
  • Conversational Search Only – Context-aware dialogue for Q&A, not agentic or autonomous behavior
  • Basic RAG Architecture – Standard retrieval without function calling, tool use, or workflows
  • ⚠️ No External Actions – Cannot invoke APIs, execute code, query databases, or interact externally
  • Internal Knowledge Focus – Employee Q&A about documents, not task automation or workflows
  • Custom AI Agents – Autonomous GPT-4/Claude agents for business tasks
  • Multi-Agent Systems – Specialized agents for support, sales, knowledge
  • Memory & Context – Persistent conversation history across sessions
  • Tool Integration – Webhooks + 5,000 Zapier apps for automation
  • Continuous Learning – Auto re-indexing without manual retraining

Ready to experience the CustomGPT difference?

Start Free Trial →

Final Thoughts

Final Verdict: CODY AI vs Pyx

After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both CODY AI and Pyx are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.

When to Choose CODY AI

  • You value true rag architecture with pinecone vector database and configurable retrieval parameters (relevance score, token distribution, focus mode)
  • Source attribution with every response - click-through to exact documents used for generation (transparency and trust differentiator)
  • Focus Mode unique capability: inject up to 1,000 specific documents into conversation context for targeted responses vs full knowledge base

Best For: TRUE RAG architecture with Pinecone vector database and configurable retrieval parameters (relevance score, token distribution, Focus Mode)

When to Choose Pyx

  • You value very quick setup (30-60 minutes)
  • No manual data imports required
  • Excellent ease of use with conversational interface

Best For: Very quick setup (30-60 minutes)

Migration & Switching Considerations

Switching between CODY AI and Pyx requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.

Pricing Comparison Summary

CODY AI starts at $29/month, while Pyx begins at $30/month. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.

Our Recommendation Process

  1. Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
  2. Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
  3. Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
  4. Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
  5. Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality

For most organizations, the decision between CODY AI and Pyx comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.

📚 Next Steps

Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.

  • Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
  • Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
  • Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
  • Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements

Last updated: February 20, 2026 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.

Ready to Get Started with CustomGPT?

Join thousands of businesses that trust CustomGPT for their AI needs. Choose the path that works best for you.

Why Choose CustomGPT?

97% Accuracy

Industry-leading benchmarks

5-Min Setup

Get started instantly

24/7 Support

Expert help when you need it

Enterprise Ready

Scale with confidence

Trusted by leading companies worldwide

Fortune 500Fortune 500Fortune 500Fortune 500Fortune 500Fortune 500

CustomGPT

The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.

Get in touch
Contact Us

Join the Discussion

Loading comments...

Priyansh Khodiyar's avatar

Priyansh Khodiyar

DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.

Watch: Understanding AI Tool Comparisons