In this comprehensive guide, we compare Deviniti and Voiceflow across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.
Overview
When choosing between Deviniti and Voiceflow, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose Deviniti if: you value strong compliance and security focus
Choose Voiceflow if: you value visual workflow builder enables non-technical teams to build complex agents
About Deviniti
Deviniti is self-hosted genai solutions for compliance-critical industries. Deviniti is an AI development company specializing in secure, self-hosted AI agents and LLM solutions for highly regulated industries like finance, healthcare, and legal, with expertise in RAG architecture and custom AI development. Founded in 2010, headquartered in Kraków, Poland, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
77/100
Starting Price
Custom
About Voiceflow
Voiceflow is collaborative ai agent building platform for teams. Voiceflow is a collaborative workflow-first platform for building, deploying, and scaling AI agents. Born from Alexa skill development (2017-2019), it evolved into a full-stack agent platform with visual canvas design, function calling, and enterprise-grade observability. Used by Mercedes-Benz, JP Morgan, and 200K+ teams. Founded in 2017, headquartered in Toronto, Canada, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
90/100
Starting Price
$40/mo
Key Differences at a Glance
In terms of user ratings, Voiceflow in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, Deviniti starts at a lower price point. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: AI Development versus AI Agent Platform. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.
⚠️ What This Comparison Covers
We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.
Detailed Feature Comparison
Deviniti
Voiceflow
CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
Builds custom pipelines to pull in pretty much any source—internal docs, FAQs, websites, databases, even proprietary APIs.
Works with all the usual suspects (PDF, DOCX, etc.) and can tap uncommon sources if the project needs it.
Project case study
Designs scalable setups—hardware, storage, indexing—to handle huge data sets and keep everything fresh with automated pipelines.
Learn more
Knowledge Base (KB) feature with RAG-powered document retrieval
Supports file uploads: PDF, Word docs, plain text, CSV
Website crawling with sitemap ingestion
Note: Accuracy concerns: User reviews note KB "often inaccurate" and "too general"
Manual document chunking and preprocessing required for optimal results
Integrations for knowledge: Google Drive, Notion, Confluence, Zendesk
Auto-sync available for connected sources (Pro+)
Vector search with semantic matching for knowledge retrieval
Custom metadata tagging for organized knowledge management
No explicit document limits on plans - scales based on storage tier
Lets you ingest more than 1,400 file formats—PDF, DOCX, TXT, Markdown, HTML, and many more—via simple drag-and-drop or API.
Crawls entire sites through sitemaps and URLs, automatically indexing public help-desk articles, FAQs, and docs.
Turns multimedia into text on the fly: YouTube videos, podcasts, and other media are auto-transcribed with built-in OCR and speech-to-text.
View Transcription Guide
Connects to Google Drive, SharePoint, Notion, Confluence, HubSpot, and more through API connectors or Zapier.
See Zapier Connectors
Supports both manual uploads and auto-sync retraining, so your knowledge base always stays up to date.
Integrations & Channels
Plugs the chatbot into any channel you need—web, mobile, Slack, Teams, or even legacy apps—tailored to your stack.
Spins up custom API endpoints or webhooks to hook into CRMs, ERPs, or ITSM tools (dev work included).
Integration approach
Documentation: Comprehensive guides, video tutorials, API docs
Training resources: Voiceflow Academy with certification programs
Partner program: Agency partnerships for white-label development
Supplies rich docs, tutorials, cookbooks, and FAQs to get you started fast.
Developer Docs
Offers quick email and in-app chat support—Premium and Enterprise plans add dedicated managers and faster SLAs.
Enterprise Solutions
Benefits from an active user community plus integrations through Zapier and GitHub resources.
Additional Considerations
Can build hybrid agents that run complex, transactional tasks—not just Q&A.
You own the solution end-to-end and can evolve it as AI tech moves forward.
Custom governance
Workflow-first vs. RAG-first: Voiceflow excels at complex workflows, but KB accuracy lags specialized RAG platforms
Learning curve: Steeper than simple chatbot builders despite visual interface
Visual canvas can become overwhelming for very complex agents (100+ blocks)
Best use case: Multi-step workflows requiring orchestration, API integrations, and team collaboration
Not ideal for: Simple document Q&A or pure knowledge retrieval use cases
Competitive positioning: More sophisticated than no-code chatbots (Chatbase, WonderChat), less specialized than pure RAG (CustomGPT)
Voice capabilities: Strong for voice assistants (Alexa, Google), but not general telephony
Enterprise customers praise collaboration features and workflow flexibility
Pricing can escalate quickly with additional seats and agents
Slashes engineering overhead with an all-in-one RAG platform—no in-house ML team required.
Gets you to value quickly: launch a functional AI assistant in minutes.
Stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements, so you’re always on the latest tech.
Balances top-tier accuracy with ease of use, perfect for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects.
No- Code Interface & Usability
No out-of-the-box no-code dashboard—IT or bespoke admin panels handle config.
Everyday users chat with the bot; deeper tweaks live with the tech team.
Visual canvas builder with drag-and-drop simplicity
Google Docs-style collaboration: 10+ people editing simultaneously
Real-time cursor tracking, comments, and mentions
Block-based architecture: 50+ pre-built blocks for common tasks
No coding required for 80% of use cases
Custom code option: JavaScript blocks for advanced logic when needed
Template library: Start from 100+ pre-built templates
Component library for reusable workflow sections
Testing tools: Built-in chat simulator for real-time testing
One-click deployment: Publish to channels with single button
Ease of use rating: 8.7/10 (G2 reviews) - complex features require training
Voiceflow Academy provides certification and training for team ramp-up
Offers a wizard-style web dashboard so non-devs can upload content, brand the widget, and monitor performance.
Supports drag-and-drop uploads, visual theme editing, and in-browser chatbot testing.
User Experience Review
Uses role-based access so business users and devs can collaborate smoothly.
Competitive Positioning
Market position: Custom AI development agency (200+ clients served) specializing in self-hosted, enterprise RAG solutions with domain-specific fine-tuning and legacy system integration
Target customers: Large enterprises needing fully custom AI solutions, organizations with legacy systems requiring specialized integration, and companies requiring on-premises deployment with complete data sovereignty and compliance control
Key competitors: Azumo, internal AI development teams, Contextual.ai (enterprise), and other custom AI consulting firms
Competitive advantages: 200+ enterprise clients demonstrating proven track record, model-agnostic approach with fine-tuning on proprietary data, on-prem/private cloud deployment for full data control, custom API/workflow development tailored to exact specifications, white-glove support with direct dev team access, and complete solution ownership with bespoke UI/branding
Pricing advantage: Project-based pricing plus optional maintenance; higher upfront cost than SaaS but provides long-term ownership without subscription fees; best value for unique enterprise needs that can't be met with off-the-shelf solutions and require custom integrations
Use case fit: Ideal for enterprises with legacy systems needing specialized AI integration, organizations requiring domain-tuned models with insider terminology, companies needing hybrid AI agents handling complex transactional tasks beyond Q&A, and businesses demanding on-premises deployment with complete data sovereignty and custom compliance measures
Market position: Workflow-first conversational AI platform (founded 2017, $28M funding) specializing in complex multi-step orchestration and team collaboration, not pure RAG tool
Target customers: Enterprise teams (200K+ users, customers: Mercedes-Benz, JP Morgan, Shopify) needing sophisticated multi-agent workflows, organizations requiring team collaboration (10+ simultaneous editors), and companies building voice assistants for Alexa/Google/telephony beyond simple Q&A
Key competitors: Botpress, Rasa, Microsoft Power Virtual Agents, and workflow automation platforms; less comparable to pure RAG tools (CustomGPT, Botsonic)
Competitive advantages: Visual workflow canvas with 50+ drag-and-drop blocks for complex orchestration, Google Docs-style real-time collaboration (10+ editors), multi-model support (GPT-4, GPT-3.5, Claude, Gemini) with per-step selection, 15+ native integrations (CRM, helpdesk, messaging, e-commerce), SOC 2/GDPR/HIPAA compliance with on-prem deployment, comprehensive API/SDKs (JS, Python) with webhook system, 99.9% uptime SLA (Enterprise), A/B testing framework, and Voiceflow Academy for training/certification
Pricing advantage: Free Sandbox tier (2 agents, unlimited interactions); Pro at $50/month reasonable for startups; Team ($625/month) and Enterprise (custom) can escalate quickly with per-seat charges ($15-25/user) and per-agent fees ($20-50); best value for teams needing complex workflows and collaboration over simple RAG; Knowledge Base accuracy concerns make it less suitable for pure document Q&A
Use case fit: Ideal for enterprises building complex multi-step workflows requiring API integrations and orchestration, teams needing real-time collaboration (10+ people) on conversational AI development, and organizations building voice assistants (Alexa, Google) or sophisticated customer journeys; NOT ideal for simple document Q&A due to Knowledge Base accuracy issues ("often inaccurate" per reviews)
Market position: Leading all-in-one RAG platform balancing enterprise-grade accuracy with developer-friendly APIs and no-code usability for rapid deployment
Target customers: Mid-market to enterprise organizations needing production-ready AI assistants, development teams wanting robust APIs without building RAG infrastructure, and businesses requiring 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription (YouTube, podcasts)
Key competitors: OpenAI Assistants API, Botsonic, Chatbase.co, Azure AI, and custom RAG implementations using LangChain
Competitive advantages: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling included, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, hosted MCP Server support (Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT), generous data limits (60M words Standard, 300M Premium), and flat monthly pricing without per-query charges
Pricing advantage: Transparent flat-rate pricing at $99/month (Standard) and $449/month (Premium) with generous included limits; no hidden costs for API access, branding removal, or basic features; best value for teams needing both no-code dashboard and developer APIs in one platform
Use case fit: Ideal for businesses needing both rapid no-code deployment and robust API capabilities, organizations handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), teams requiring white-label chatbots with source citations for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects, and companies wanting all-in-one RAG without managing ML infrastructure
A I Models
Model-agnostic approach: Supports any LLM - GPT-4, Claude, Llama 2, Falcon, Cohere, or custom models based on client needs
Custom model fine-tuning: Fine-tune models on proprietary data for domain-specific terminology and insider jargon
Local LLM deployment: On-premises model hosting for complete data sovereignty and offline operation
Multiple model support: Deploy different models for different use cases within same infrastructure
Model flexibility: Swap models through new build/deploy cycle as requirements evolve
Custom training pipelines: Build specialized training workflows for continuous model improvement
Multi-model support: GPT-4, GPT-3.5-turbo, Claude (Anthropic), Google Gemini with per-agent or per-step model selection
Function calling: GPT-4 and Claude function calling for real-time action triggering during conversations
Custom model integration: Integrate proprietary LLMs via API for specialized domain requirements
Temperature and token controls: Configurable per request for balancing creativity vs predictability (0.0-2.0 range)
Automatic fallback models: Configure backup models for reliability when primary model unavailable
Cost optimization routing: Route simple queries to GPT-3.5, complex queries to GPT-4 for cost management
Prompt engineering tools: System prompts, few-shot examples, response formatting templates for domain-specific behavior
Primary models: GPT-5.1 and 4 series from OpenAI, and Anthropic's Claude 4.5 (opus and sonnet) for enterprise needs
Automatic model selection: Balances cost and performance by automatically selecting the appropriate model for each request
Model Selection Details
Proprietary optimizations: Custom prompt engineering and retrieval enhancements for high-quality, citation-backed answers
Managed infrastructure: All model management handled behind the scenes - no API keys or fine-tuning required from users
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms ensure chatbot only answers based on provided content, improving trust and factual accuracy
R A G Capabilities
Custom RAG architecture: Best-practice retrieval with multi-index strategies and tuned prompts for precise answers
Domain-specific fine-tuning: Train on proprietary data to eliminate hallucinations and improve accuracy for insider terminology
Custom channel deployment: Integrate into any channel - web, mobile, Slack, Teams, or legacy applications
Domain-tuned assistants: Specialized agents with fine-tuned models for technical or medical terminology
Complex multi-step workflows: API integrations, orchestration, and multi-agent coordination requiring sophisticated flow logic
Team collaboration: Real-time simultaneous editing (10+ people) with Google Docs-style cursor tracking and comments
Voice assistants: Alexa, Google Assistant, custom telephony integration for voice-based conversational AI
Customer service automation: 15+ native integrations (Zendesk, Salesforce, HubSpot, Intercom, Freshdesk) for support workflows
Lead generation: Conversational marketing with Calendly scheduling, form-based data collection, CRM sync
E-commerce: Shopify integration for order management and product recommendations within conversation flows
NOT ideal for: Simple document Q&A (Knowledge Base accuracy issues), teams needing advanced RAG features, budget-constrained startups (pricing escalates with seats/agents)
Customer support automation: AI assistants handling common queries, reducing support ticket volume, providing 24/7 instant responses with source citations
Internal knowledge management: Employee self-service for HR policies, technical documentation, onboarding materials, company procedures across 1,400+ file formats
Sales enablement: Product information chatbots, lead qualification, customer education with white-labeled widgets on websites and apps
Documentation assistance: Technical docs, help centers, FAQs with automatic website crawling and sitemap indexing
Educational platforms: Course materials, research assistance, student support with multimedia content (YouTube transcriptions, podcasts)
Healthcare information: Patient education, medical knowledge bases (SOC 2 Type II compliant for sensitive data)
Per-seat charges: Additional editors $50/month on Pro, $15-25/month on Team tier
Per-agent fees: Extra agents $20-50/month depending on tier beyond plan limits
Annual discount: ~20% savings when billed annually vs monthly across all paid tiers
Note: Call costs separate: Pricing does not include Twilio/Vonage telephony fees ($0.01-$0.03/minute)
Standard Plan: $99/month or $89/month annual - 10 custom chatbots, 5,000 items per chatbot, 60 million words per bot, basic helpdesk support, standard security
View Pricing
Premium Plan: $499/month or $449/month annual - 100 custom chatbots, 20,000 items per chatbot, 300 million words per bot, advanced support, enhanced security, additional customization
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing - Comprehensive AI solutions, highest security and compliance, dedicated account managers, custom SSO, token authentication, priority support with faster SLAs
Enterprise Solutions
7-Day Free Trial: Full access to Standard features without charges - available to all users
Annual billing discount: Save 10% by paying upfront annually ($89/mo Standard, $449/mo Premium)
Flat monthly rates: No per-query charges, no hidden costs for API access or white-labeling (included in all plans)
Managed infrastructure: Auto-scaling cloud infrastructure included - no additional hosting or scaling fees
Support & Documentation
White-glove support: Direct access to development team from kickoff through post-launch
Custom documentation: Tailored documentation for your specific implementation and tech stack
Training programs: Custom training for IT teams and end users on solution usage and maintenance
Dedicated project manager: Single point of contact throughout development lifecycle
Post-launch support: Optional maintenance contracts with SLA guarantees and priority response
Integration support: Hands-on help connecting to existing enterprise systems and workflows
Knowledge transfer: Complete handoff of code, architecture docs, and operational runbooks
Enterprise focus: Proven experience with large-scale deployments and complex requirements
Company background: Founded 2017, $28M raised (Series A: $20M from Felicis, OpenAI Startup Fund, Tiger Global)
Customer base: 200K+ teams including Mercedes-Benz, JP Morgan, Shopify demonstrating enterprise validation
Community: 15K+ developers on Discord/Slack with active forum for peer support and knowledge sharing
Template marketplace: 100+ pre-built agent templates for common use cases and rapid deployment
Support tiers: Sandbox (community), Pro (priority email 24-48hr), Team (priority email + chat), Enterprise (dedicated Slack, CSM, 24/7, SLA)
Documentation: Comprehensive guides, video tutorials, API docs at docs.voiceflow.com
Training: Voiceflow Academy with certification programs for team ramp-up and skill development
Partner program: Agency partnerships for white-label development and reseller opportunities
Documentation hub: Rich docs, tutorials, cookbooks, FAQs, API references for rapid onboarding
Developer Docs
Email and in-app support: Quick support via email and in-app chat for all users
Premium support: Premium and Enterprise plans include dedicated account managers and faster SLAs
Code samples: Cookbooks, step-by-step guides, and examples for every skill level
API Documentation
Active community: User community plus 5,000+ app integrations through Zapier ecosystem
Regular updates: Platform stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements automatically
Limitations & Considerations
High upfront cost: $50K-$500K+ initial development vs $29-$999/month SaaS solutions
Longer time to value: 2-6 month development cycle vs instant SaaS deployment
Custom maintenance required: Updates and changes require development work, not self-service
No out-of-box features: Everything built from scratch - no pre-built templates or no-code tools
Technical expertise required: IT team needed for ongoing management and infrastructure
Project-based approach: Each enhancement or change may require additional development sprint
Not for budget-constrained SMBs: Best suited for large enterprises with significant AI budgets
Best for unique needs only: Only justified when off-the-shelf solutions cannot meet requirements
Knowledge Base accuracy issues: Multiple reviews cite KB as "often inaccurate" - not ideal for pure document Q&A use cases
Workflow-first, not RAG-first: Excels at complex orchestration but lags specialized RAG platforms for knowledge retrieval
Steep learning curve: More complex than simple chatbot builders despite visual interface - requires training
Pricing complexity: Per-seat charges and per-agent fees can escalate quickly beyond base plan costs
Visual canvas overwhelm: Very complex agents (100+ blocks) become difficult to manage and visualize
No SOC 2 on lower tiers: SOC 2 compliance only available on Enterprise tier, blocking some enterprise sales
Limited analytics depth: 8.7/10 ease of use but analytics require improvement for enterprise needs
99.9% uptime SLA Enterprise-only: No SLA guarantees on Pro/Team tiers for mission-critical deployments
Managed service approach: Less control over underlying RAG pipeline configuration compared to build-your-own solutions like LangChain
Vendor lock-in: Proprietary platform - migration to alternative RAG solutions requires rebuilding knowledge bases
Model selection: Limited to OpenAI (GPT-5.1 and 4 series) and Anthropic (Claude, opus and sonnet 4.5) - no support for other LLM providers (Cohere, AI21, open-source models)
Pricing at scale: Flat-rate pricing may become expensive for very high-volume use cases (millions of queries/month) compared to pay-per-use models
Customization limits: While highly configurable, some advanced RAG techniques (custom reranking, hybrid search strategies) may not be exposed
Language support: Supports 90+ languages but performance may vary for less common languages or specialized domains
Real-time data: Knowledge bases require re-indexing for updates - not ideal for real-time data requirements (stock prices, live inventory)
Enterprise features: Some advanced features (custom SSO, token authentication) only available on Enterprise plan with custom pricing
Core Agent Features
Custom AI Agents: Build autonomous agents using advanced LLM architecture with planning modules, memory systems, and RAG pipelines tailored to exact business requirements
Agent Development
Planning Module: Agents break down complex tasks into smaller manageable steps using task decomposition methods - enabling multi-step autonomous workflows
Memory System: Retains past interactions ensuring consistent responses in long-running workflows, maintaining context to improve handling of complex tasks over time
RAG Integration: Agents use specialized RAG pipelines, code interpreters, and external APIs to gather and process data efficiently - enhancing ability to access and use external resources for accurate outcomes
RAG Implementation
Tool & API Integration: Agents execute actions beyond Q&A - integrate with CRMs, ERPs, ITSM tools, proprietary APIs, and legacy systems through custom webhooks and endpoints
Domain-Tuned Behavior: Fine-tune on proprietary data for insider terminology, multi-turn memory with context preservation, and any language support including local LLM deployment
Hybrid Agent Capabilities: Build agents that run complex transactional tasks beyond simple Q&A - handle workflows like IT ticket creation, CRM updates, and approval processes
Hybrid Agents
Real-World Proven: Deployed AI Agent in Credit Agricole bank for customer service automation - routes simple queries automatically, flags complex ones for human support, and drafts personalized replies
Agent step (2024): Autonomous AI conversation flow with tool use and decision making - Agent step decides when to use tools, access knowledge base, or call other Agent steps
Multi-agent orchestration: Connect multiple Agent steps to create sophisticated frameworks including Supervisor pattern where specialized agents handle different conversation aspects
Conversation context management: Multi-turn conversations with context preservation across sessions, persistent history, and comprehensive conversation management
Hybrid architecture: Combine hard business logic with Agent networks layered on top for both risk mitigation and conversational flexibility
Human handoff protocols: Smooth transitions for complex situations with full conversation history transfer, enabling training sales teams to take over seamlessly when prospects request "real person"
Lead capture & CRM integration: Automatic lead creation in HubSpot, Salesforce, or Pipedrive, log call outcomes, and update deal stages based on conversation results
Multi-channel orchestration: Combine outbound calling with email sequences and SMS outreach for comprehensive customer engagement
Custom Action step: Trigger live chat handoff when customers request human assistance, with services like hitlchat enabling WhatsApp integration with live agents
Intent recognition & entity extraction: NLU models with slot filling for form-based data collection and hybrid Intent + RAG capabilities (March 2024 research)
100+ language support: Leverages underlying LLM multilingual capabilities with locale-based routing for global deployments
Analytics & optimization: Dashboard tracking sessions, users, completion rates, drop-offs with A/B testing framework for agent performance optimization
LIMITATION: Knowledge Base accuracy: User reviews note KB "often inaccurate" and "too general" - manual document chunking and preprocessing required for optimal results
LIMITATION: Workflow complexity: Steep learning curve despite visual interface - more complex than simple chatbot builders, requires training for team ramp-up
Custom AI Agents: Build autonomous agents powered by GPT-4 and Claude that can perform tasks independently and make real-time decisions based on business knowledge
Decision-Support Capabilities: AI agents analyze proprietary data to provide insights, recommendations, and actionable responses specific to your business domain
Multi-Agent Systems: Deploy multiple specialized AI agents that can collaborate and optimize workflows in areas like customer support, sales, and internal knowledge management
Memory & Context Management: Agents maintain conversation history and persistent context for coherent multi-turn interactions
View Agent Documentation
Tool Integration: Agents can trigger actions, integrate with external APIs via webhooks, and connect to 5,000+ apps through Zapier for automated workflows
Hyper-Accurate Responses: Leverages advanced RAG technology and retrieval mechanisms to deliver context-aware, citation-backed responses grounded in your knowledge base
Continuous Learning: Agents improve over time through automatic re-indexing of knowledge sources and integration of new data without manual retraining
R A G-as-a- Service Assessment
Platform Type: CUSTOM AI DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANCY - not a platform but professional services firm building bespoke enterprise RAG solutions and AI agents from scratch (200+ clients served)
Core Offering: Project-based custom development of self-hosted AI agents, RAG architectures, and LLM applications tailored to exact specifications - not pre-built software or SaaS
Agent Capabilities: Build fully autonomous AI agents with planning modules, memory systems, RAG pipelines, and tool integration - proven in regulated industries like banking (Credit Agricole deployment)
Agent Services
Developer Experience: White-glove professional services with dedicated dev team, project-specific API development (JSON over HTTP), custom documentation and samples, hands-on support from kickoff through post-launch
No-Code Capabilities: NONE - everything requires custom development work. No dashboard, visual builders, or self-service tools. IT teams or bespoke admin panels handle configuration post-delivery
Target Market: Large enterprises with legacy systems needing specialized AI integration, organizations requiring on-premises deployment with complete data sovereignty, companies with unique needs that can't be met with off-the-shelf solutions
RAG Technology Approach: Best-practice retrieval with multi-index strategies, tuned prompts, fine-tuning on proprietary data to eliminate hallucinations, custom vector DB selection, and hybrid search strategies tailored to data characteristics
RAG Approach
Deployment Model: On-prem or private cloud only - complete data control with no cloud vendor dependencies, custom infrastructure managed by client, strong encryption and access controls integrated with existing security stack
Enterprise Readiness: ISO 27001 certification, GDPR and CCPA compliance, custom compliance measures for HIPAA or industry-specific requirements, AES-256 encryption, RBAC integrated with existing identity management
Pricing Model: Project-based $50K-$500K+ initial development plus optional ongoing maintenance contracts - higher upfront cost but no recurring SaaS fees, full solution ownership
Use Case Fit: Enterprises with legacy systems needing specialized AI integration, domain-tuned models with insider terminology, hybrid AI agents handling complex transactional tasks, on-premises deployment with complete data sovereignty
NOT A PLATFORM: Does not offer self-service software, API-as-a-service, or turnkey solutions - exclusively custom development consultancy requiring sales engagement and multi-month build cycles
Competitive Positioning: Competes with other AI consultancies (Azumo, internal AI teams) and enterprise RAG platforms - differentiates through 200+ client track record, regulated industry expertise (banking, legal), and complete customization
Platform Type: WORKFLOW-FIRST PLATFORM WITH RAG CAPABILITIES - specialized in complex multi-step orchestration and team collaboration, NOT a pure RAG-as-a-Service platform
Core Architecture: Visual workflow canvas with 50+ drag-and-drop blocks combining intent-based approaches with RAG integration for knowledge-based responses (hybrid Intent + RAG architecture)
RAG Integration: Knowledge Base feature with vector search (Qdrant) querying documents using GPT-4, but RAG is secondary to workflow automation capabilities
Developer Experience: Comprehensive REST API, JavaScript/TypeScript and Python SDKs, custom code blocks (JavaScript execution within workflows), GraphQL API for flexible querying
No-Code Alternative: Google Docs-style collaboration with visual canvas builder - 10+ people editing simultaneously with real-time cursor tracking, comments, and mentions
Hybrid Target Market: Enterprise teams (200K+ users, Mercedes-Benz, JP Morgan, Shopify) needing sophisticated multi-agent workflows beyond simple Q&A - less suitable for pure document retrieval use cases
RAG Limitations: Knowledge Base "often inaccurate" per reviews, no configurable RAG parameters (chunking strategy, embedding models, similarity thresholds), manual preprocessing required
Workflow Strengths: Excels at complex orchestration with API integrations, multi-agent coordination, human handoff, CRM/helpdesk integrations (15+), and sophisticated customer journeys
Industry Positioning (2024): Moved toward hybrid approaches combining workflows, intent recognition, and RAG - pure vector databases lead to low recall/hit rates, workflows remain essential for integrating systems and controlled task execution
Deployment Flexibility: 15+ channel integrations (Slack, Teams, WhatsApp, Alexa, Google Assistant), webhook support, website embed widget, native mobile SDKs (iOS/Android)
Use Case Fit: Ideal for complex multi-step workflows requiring API integrations/orchestration, real-time team collaboration (10+ editors), voice assistants (Alexa/Google/telephony); NOT ideal for simple document Q&A due to KB accuracy issues
Competitive Positioning: More sophisticated than no-code chatbots (Chatbase, WonderChat) but less specialized than pure RAG platforms (CustomGPT) - competes with Botpress, Rasa, Microsoft Power Virtual Agents
LIMITATION: Not pure RAG: Workflow-first platform where RAG is feature, not core offering - organizations needing advanced RAG controls should consider specialized platforms (CustomGPT, Ragie, Vertex AI)
LIMITATION: Pricing escalation: Per-seat charges ($15-25/user) and per-agent fees ($20-50) can escalate quickly - best value for teams needing collaboration and workflows over simple RAG
Core Architecture: Serverless RAG infrastructure with automatic embedding generation, vector search optimization, and LLM orchestration fully managed behind API endpoints
API-First Design: Comprehensive REST API with well-documented endpoints for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data (1,400+ formats), and querying chat
API Documentation
Developer Experience: Open-source Python SDK (customgpt-client), Postman collections, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, and extensive cookbooks for rapid integration
No-Code Alternative: Wizard-style web dashboard enables non-developers to upload content, brand widgets, and deploy chatbots without touching code
Hybrid Target Market: Serves both developer teams wanting robust APIs AND business users seeking no-code RAG deployment - unique positioning vs pure API platforms (Cohere) or pure no-code tools (Jotform)
RAG Technology Leadership: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, proprietary anti-hallucination mechanisms, and citation-backed responses
Benchmark Details
Deployment Flexibility: Cloud-hosted SaaS with auto-scaling, API integrations, embedded chat widgets, ChatGPT Plugin support, and hosted MCP Server for Claude/Cursor/ChatGPT
Enterprise Readiness: SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling, domain allowlisting, RBAC with 2FA/SSO, and flat-rate pricing without per-query charges
Use Case Fit: Ideal for organizations needing both rapid no-code deployment AND robust API capabilities, teams handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), and businesses requiring production-ready RAG without building ML infrastructure from scratch
Competitive Positioning: Bridges the gap between developer-first platforms (Cohere, Deepset) requiring heavy coding and no-code chatbot builders (Jotform, Kommunicate) lacking API depth - offers best of both worlds
After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both Deviniti and Voiceflow are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.
When to Choose Deviniti
You value strong compliance and security focus
Self-hosted solutions for data privacy
Domain expertise in regulated industries
Best For: Strong compliance and security focus
When to Choose Voiceflow
You value visual workflow builder enables non-technical teams to build complex agents
Real-time collaboration features rival Figma - 10+ people editing simultaneously
Function calling and API integrations allow true action-taking agents
Best For: Visual workflow builder enables non-technical teams to build complex agents
Migration & Switching Considerations
Switching between Deviniti and Voiceflow requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.
Pricing Comparison Summary
Deviniti starts at custom pricing, while Voiceflow begins at $40/month. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.
Our Recommendation Process
Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality
For most organizations, the decision between Deviniti and Voiceflow comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.
📚 Next Steps
Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.
• Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
• Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
• Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
• Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements
Last updated: December 14, 2025 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.
The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.
DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.
People Also Compare
Explore more AI tool comparisons to find the perfect solution for your needs
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...