Lindy.ai vs Pyx

Make an informed decision with our comprehensive comparison. Discover which RAG solution perfectly fits your needs.

Priyansh Khodiyar's avatar
Priyansh KhodiyarDevRel at CustomGPT.ai

Fact checked and reviewed by Bill Cava

Published: 01.04.2025Updated: 25.04.2025

In this comprehensive guide, we compare Lindy.ai and Pyx across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.

Overview

When choosing between Lindy.ai and Pyx, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.

Quick Decision Guide

  • Choose Lindy.ai if: you value exceptional no-code usability: 4.9/5 g2 rating, 30-second setup vs 15-60 min with zapier/make
  • Choose Pyx if: you value very quick setup (30-60 minutes)

About Lindy.ai

Lindy.ai Landing Page Screenshot

Lindy.ai is ai-powered personal assistant for workflow automation. No-code AI agent platform positioning as 'AI employees' for workflow automation, NOT developer-focused RAG platform. 5,000+ integrations via Pipedream, Claude Sonnet 4.5 default, $5.1M revenue (Oct 2024), 4.9/5 G2 rating. Critical limitation: No public API or SDKs available. Founded in 2023, headquartered in San Francisco, CA, USA, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.

Overall Rating
81/100
Starting Price
Custom

About Pyx

Pyx Landing Page Screenshot

Pyx is find. don't search.. Pyx AI is an enterprise conversational search tool that leverages Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to deliver real-time answers from company data. It continuously synchronizes with data sources and enables natural language queries across unstructured documents without keywords or pre-sorting. Founded in 2022, headquartered in Europe, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.

Overall Rating
83/100
Starting Price
$30/mo

Key Differences at a Glance

In terms of user ratings, both platforms score similarly in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, Lindy.ai starts at a lower price point. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: AI Assistant versus AI Search. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.

⚠️ What This Comparison Covers

We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.

Detailed Feature Comparison

logo of lindy
Lindy.ai
logo of pyx
Pyx
logo of customGPT logo
CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
  • Document Formats – PDF, DOCX, XLSX, CSV, TXT, HTML (20MB per file)
  • Cloud Integrations – Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint, auto 24-hour sync
  • ⚠️ Storage Limits – 1M chars (Free), 20M (Pro), 50M (Business)
  • ⚠️ Search Constraint – Fuzziness <100 limits to first 1,500 files
  • ✅ Auto-Indexing – Points at files, indexes unstructured data automatically without manual setup
  • ✅ Auto-Sync – Connected repositories sync automatically, document changes reflected almost instantly
  • File Formats – Supports PDF, DOCX, PPT, TXT and common enterprise formats
  • ⚠️ Limited Scope – No website crawling or YouTube ingestion, narrower than CustomGPT
  • Enterprise Scale – Handles large corporate data sets, exact limits not published
  • 1,400+ file formats – PDF, DOCX, Excel, PowerPoint, Markdown, HTML + auto-extraction from ZIP/RAR/7Z archives
  • Website crawling – Sitemap indexing with configurable depth for help docs, FAQs, and public content
  • Multimedia transcription – AI Vision, OCR, YouTube/Vimeo/podcast speech-to-text built-in
  • Cloud integrations – Google Drive, SharePoint, OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion with auto-sync
  • Knowledge platforms – Zendesk, Freshdesk, HubSpot, Confluence, Shopify connectors
  • Massive scale – 60M words (Standard) / 300M words (Premium) per bot with no performance degradation
Integrations & Channels
  • 5,000+ Apps – Via Pipedream Connect with 2,500+ ready actions
  • Messaging – Slack, WhatsApp, Teams, Telegram, Discord, Twilio SMS
  • CRM – Salesforce (24 actions), HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho CRM
  • Productivity – Notion, Airtable, Google Workspace (Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Sheets, Drive)
  • Webhooks + HTTP – Inbound triggers and outbound API calls
  • ⚠️ Standalone Only – Own chat/search interface, not a "deploy everywhere" platform
  • ⚠️ No External Channels – No Slack bot, Zapier connector, or public API
  • Web/Desktop UI – Users interact through Pyx's interface, minimal third-party chat synergy
  • Custom Integration – Deeper integrations require custom dev work or future updates
  • Website embedding – Lightweight JS widget or iframe with customizable positioning
  • CMS plugins – WordPress, WIX, Webflow, Framer, SquareSpace native support
  • 5,000+ app ecosystem – Zapier connects CRMs, marketing, e-commerce tools
  • MCP Server – Integrate with Claude Desktop, Cursor, ChatGPT, Windsurf
  • OpenAI SDK compatible – Drop-in replacement for OpenAI API endpoints
  • LiveChat + Slack – Native chat widgets with human handoff capabilities
Core Agent Features
  • Agent Autonomy Focus – Task execution vs conversational chatbot
  • Multi-Lingual – 30+ (voice), 50+ (transcription), 85+ (text)
  • ✅ Lead Capture – Real-time qualification, CRM sync (70% higher conversion claimed)
  • Agent Evals – Benchmarking with regression prevention
  • ⚠️ NO Agent Capabilities – No autonomous agents, tool calling, or multi-agent orchestration
  • Conversational Search Only – Context-aware dialogue for Q&A, not agentic or autonomous behavior
  • Basic RAG Architecture – Standard retrieval without function calling, tool use, or workflows
  • ⚠️ No External Actions – Cannot invoke APIs, execute code, query databases, or interact externally
  • Internal Knowledge Focus – Employee Q&A about documents, not task automation or workflows
  • Custom AI Agents – Autonomous GPT-4/Claude agents for business tasks
  • Multi-Agent Systems – Specialized agents for support, sales, knowledge
  • Memory & Context – Persistent conversation history across sessions
  • Tool Integration – Webhooks + 5,000 Zapier apps for automation
  • Continuous Learning – Auto re-indexing without manual retraining
Customization & Branding
  • Widget – Custom name, accent color, logo for expanded/collapsed states
  • Domain Restrictions – Control allowed deployment domains
  • Memory Snippets – Learning preferences saved across sessions
  • ⚠️ White-Label Unclear – Complete branding removal not explicitly confirmed
  • ⚠️ Minimal Branding – Logo/color tweaks only, designed as internal tool not white-label
  • ⚠️ No Embedding – Standalone interface, no domain-embed or widget options available
  • Pyx UI Only – Look stays "Pyx AI" by design, public branding not supported
  • Security Focus – Emphasis on user management and access controls over theming
  • Full white-labeling included – Colors, logos, CSS, custom domains at no extra cost
  • 2-minute setup – No-code wizard with drag-and-drop interface
  • Persona customization – Control AI personality, tone, response style via pre-prompts
  • Visual theme editor – Real-time preview of branding changes
  • Domain allowlisting – Restrict embedding to approved sites only
L L M Model Options
  • Anthropic Claude – Sonnet 4.5 (default), Sonnet 3.7, Haiku 3.5
  • OpenAI – GPT-5, GPT-5 Codex, GPT-4o, GPT-4 Turbo, o3, o1
  • Google Gemini – 2.5 Pro, 2.5 Flash, 2.0 Flash
  • Per-Action Selection – Manual model choice affects credit consumption
  • ⚠️ No Auto-Routing – No dynamic model switching
  • ⚠️ Undisclosed Model – Likely GPT-3.5/GPT-4 but exact model not publicly documented
  • ⚠️ No Model Selection – Cannot switch LLMs or configure speed vs accuracy tradeoffs
  • ⚠️ Single Configuration – Every query uses same model, no toggles or fine-tuning
  • Closed Architecture – Model details, context window, capabilities hidden from users intentionally
  • GPT-5.1 models – Latest thinking models (Optimal & Smart variants)
  • GPT-4 series – GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-4o available
  • Claude 4.5 – Anthropic's Opus available for Enterprise
  • Auto model routing – Balances cost/performance automatically
  • Zero API key management – All models managed behind the scenes
Developer Experience ( A P I & S D Ks)
  • ⚠️ CRITICAL LIMITATION – NO public REST API, GraphQL, or SDKs
  • Workarounds Only – Inbound webhooks, HTTP actions, Code sandboxes (~150ms)
  • User-Focused Docs – Lindy Academy for business users, NO API reference
  • ⚠️ No API – No open API or SDKs, everything through Pyx interface
  • ⚠️ No Embedding – Cannot integrate into other apps or call programmatically
  • Closed Ecosystem – No GitHub examples, community plug-ins, or extensibility options
  • Turnkey Only – Great for ready-made tool, limits deep customization or extensions
  • REST API – Full-featured for agents, projects, data ingestion, chat queries
  • Python SDK – Open-source customgpt-client with full API coverage
  • Postman collections – Pre-built requests for rapid prototyping
  • Webhooks – Real-time event notifications for conversations and leads
  • OpenAI compatible – Use existing OpenAI SDK code with minimal changes
Performance & Accuracy
  • Hybrid Search – Semantic + keyword with Fuzziness slider (0-100)
  • Hallucination Reduction – Human confirmation before actions
  • ⚠️ NO Published Benchmarks – No RAG accuracy or latency metrics
  • ⚠️ Black Box – Vector database and embedding models undisclosed
  • Real-Time Answers – Serves accurate responses from internal documents, sparse public benchmarks
  • Auto-Sync Freshness – Connected repositories keep retrieval context always current automatically
  • ⚠️ Limited Transparency – No anti-hallucination metrics or advanced re-ranking details published
  • Competitive RAG – Likely comparable to standard GPT-based systems on relevance control
  • Sub-second responses – Optimized RAG with vector search and multi-layer caching
  • Benchmark-proven – 13% higher accuracy, 34% faster than OpenAI Assistants API
  • Anti-hallucination tech – Responses grounded only in your provided content
  • OpenGraph citations – Rich visual cards with titles, descriptions, images
  • 99.9% uptime – Auto-scaling infrastructure handles traffic spikes
Pricing & Scalability
  • Free: $0 – 400 credits, 1M char knowledge base
  • Pro: $49.99 – 5,000 credits, 20M chars, phone calls, Lindy branding
  • Business: $199.99-$299.99 – 20K-30K credits, 50M chars, custom branding
  • Enterprise: Custom – SSO, SCIM, dedicated support, custom training
  • ⚠️ Unpredictable Costs – Credit depletion speed is primary user complaint
  • Seat-Based Pricing – ~$30 per user per month, predictable monthly costs
  • ✅ Cost-Effective Small Teams – Affordable for teams under 50 users
  • ⚠️ Large Team Costs – 100 users = $3,000/month, can scale expensively
  • Unlimited Content – Document/token limits not published, gated only by user seats
  • Free Trial + Enterprise – Hands-on trial available, custom pricing for large deployments
  • Standard: $99/mo – 60M words, 10 bots
  • Premium: $449/mo – 300M words, 100 bots
  • Auto-scaling – Managed cloud scales with demand
  • Flat rates – No per-query charges
Security & Privacy
  • SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, PIPEDA, CCPA – Comprehensive compliance
  • Encryption – AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.2+ in transit
  • Enterprise SSO + SCIM – Automated user lifecycle management
  • ⚠️ US Data Residency Only – No explicit EU option documented
  • ✅ GDPR Compliance – Germany-based, implicit EU data protection and regional sovereignty
  • ✅ Enterprise Privacy – Data isolated per customer, encrypted in transit and rest
  • ✅ No Model Training – Customer data not used for external LLM training
  • ✅ Role-Based Access – Built-in controls, admins set document visibility per role
  • ⚠️ Limited Certifications – On-prem or SOC 2/ISO 27001/HIPAA not publicly documented
  • SOC 2 Type II + GDPR – Third-party audited compliance
  • Encryption – 256-bit AES at rest, SSL/TLS in transit
  • Access controls – RBAC, 2FA, SSO, domain allowlisting
  • Data isolation – Never trains on your data
Observability & Monitoring
  • Workflow Performance – Agent action visibility with recent runs
  • Audit Logs – User actions, data access on Business/Enterprise plans
  • ⚠️ Log Retention – 1 day (Free) severely constrains troubleshooting
  • ⚠️ NO RAG Metrics – Cannot track retrieval precision or recall
  • Basic Stats – User activity, query counts, top-referenced documents for admins
  • ⚠️ No Deep Analytics – No conversation analytics dashboards or real-time logging
  • Adoption Tracking – Useful for usage monitoring, lighter insights than full suites
  • Set-and-Forget – Minimal monitoring overhead, contact support for issues
  • Real-time dashboard – Query volumes, token usage, response times
  • Customer Intelligence – User behavior patterns, popular queries, knowledge gaps
  • Conversation analytics – Full transcripts, resolution rates, common questions
  • Export capabilities – API export to BI tools and data warehouses
Support & Ecosystem
  • Email Support – support@lindy.ai, security@lindy.ai, privacy@lindy.ai
  • Slack + Forum – community.lindy.ai for peer support
  • 100+ Templates – Pre-built workflow automation scenarios
  • ⚠️ Support Inconsistency – Mixed reviews on responsiveness for lower tiers
  • ✅ Direct Support – Email, phone, chat with hands-on onboarding approach
  • ⚠️ No Open Community – Closed solution, no plug-ins or user-built extensions
  • Internal Roadmap – Product updates from Pyx only, no community marketplace
  • Quick Setup Focus – Emphasizes minimal admin overhead for internal knowledge search
  • Comprehensive docs – Tutorials, cookbooks, API references
  • Email + in-app support – Under 24hr response time
  • Premium support – Dedicated account managers for Premium/Enterprise
  • Open-source SDK – Python SDK, Postman, GitHub examples
  • 5,000+ Zapier apps – CRMs, e-commerce, marketing integrations
No- Code Interface & Usability
  • ✅ 4.9/5 G2 Rating – 109+ reviews validate ease of use
  • Agent Builder – Natural language prompts create complex agents
  • Setup Speed – 30 seconds vs 15-60 minutes with Zapier/Make
  • Drag-Drop Builder – Visual workflow construction, zero coding
  • ✅ Straightforward UI – Users log in, ask questions, get answers without coding
  • ✅ No-Code Admin – Admins connect data sources, Pyx indexes automatically
  • Minimal Customization – UI stays consistent and uncluttered by design
  • Internal Q&A Hub – Perfect for employee use, not external embedding or branding
  • 2-minute deployment – Fastest time-to-value in the industry
  • Wizard interface – Step-by-step with visual previews
  • Drag-and-drop – Upload files, paste URLs, connect cloud storage
  • In-browser testing – Test before deploying to production
  • Zero learning curve – Productive on day one
Autopilot & Computer Use ( Core Differentiator)
  • Unique Capability – AI agents operate cloud-based virtual computers
  • No API Required – Interact with any website/application through computer vision
  • E2B Sandboxes – Secure Python/JavaScript execution (~150ms startup)
  • ✅ Market Differentiation – Computer Use unique among no-code automation platforms
N/A
N/A
Multi- Agent Collaboration
  • Societies of Lindies – Multiple specialized agents with delegation rules
  • Context Preservation – Full conversation history passed between agents
  • Use Cases – Sales (SDR → AE → CS), Support (Triage → Technical → Escalation)
  • Learning Shared – Feedback across agent society for collective improvement
N/A
N/A
Lead Capture & Conversion
  • Real-Time Qualification – AI evaluates lead quality during conversation
  • Enrichment – Firmographic data, UTM attribution, validation
  • Auto CRM Sync – Qualified leads flow to Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho
  • ✅ 70% Higher Conversion – Claimed vs traditional forms (vendor claim)
N/A
N/A
R A G-as-a- Service Assessment
  • ⚠️ NOT a RAG Platform – Workflow automation for business users vs developers
  • Black-Box RAG – Hybrid search with no exposed retrieval controls
  • NO API, SDKs, CLI – No programmatic access for developers
  • ⚠️ NOT TRUE RAG-AS-A-SERVICE – Standalone internal app, not API-accessible RAG platform
  • Turnkey Application – Self-contained Q&A tool vs developer-accessible RAG infrastructure
  • ⚠️ No API Access – No REST API, SDKs, programmatic access unlike CustomGPT/Vectara
  • Closed Application – Web/desktop interface only, cannot build custom applications on top
  • SaaS vs RaaS – Software-as-a-Service (standalone app) NOT Retrieval-as-a-Service (API infrastructure)
  • Best Comparison Category – Internal search tools (Glean, Guru), not developer RAG platforms
  • Platform type – TRUE RAG-AS-A-SERVICE with managed infrastructure
  • API-first – REST API, Python SDK, OpenAI compatibility, MCP Server
  • No-code option – 2-minute wizard deployment for non-developers
  • Hybrid positioning – Serves both dev teams (APIs) and business users (no-code)
  • Enterprise ready – SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, WCAG 2.0, flat-rate pricing
Competitive Positioning
  • ✅ Primary Advantage – 4.9/5 G2 usability with 5,000+ integrations
  • Financial Validation – $5.1M revenue, $50M+ funding (Menlo, Battery, Coatue)
  • Claude Sonnet 4.5 Default – Drove 10x customer growth
  • ⚠️ Pricing Unpredictability – Credit-based model most common complaint
  • Market Position – Turnkey internal knowledge search (Germany), not embeddable chatbot platform
  • Target Customers – Small-mid European teams needing GDPR compliance and simple deployment
  • Key Competitors – Glean, Guru, Notion AI; not customer-facing chatbots like CustomGPT
  • ✅ Advantages – Simple scope, auto-sync, GDPR compliance, ~$30/user/month predictable pricing
  • ⚠️ Use Case Fit – Perfect for <50 user teams, not API integrations or public chatbots
  • Market position – Leading RAG platform balancing enterprise accuracy with no-code usability. Trusted by 6,000+ orgs including Adobe, MIT, Dropbox.
  • Key differentiators – #1 benchmarked accuracy • 1,400+ formats • Full white-labeling included • Flat-rate pricing
  • vs OpenAI – 10% lower hallucination, 13% higher accuracy, 34% faster
  • vs Botsonic/Chatbase – More file formats, source citations, no hidden costs
  • vs LangChain – Production-ready in 2 min vs weeks of development
A I Models
  • Default: Claude Sonnet 4.5 – 'Almost no one overrides' per Anthropic
  • Claude Family – Sonnet 4.5, 3.7, Haiku 3.5 (200K context)
  • OpenAI – GPT-5, GPT-4o, GPT-4 Turbo, o3, o1
  • Google – Gemini 2.5 Pro, 2.5 Flash, 2.0 Flash
  • ⚠️ Undisclosed LLM – Likely GPT-3.5/GPT-4 but model details not publicly documented
  • ⚠️ No Model Selection – Cannot switch LLMs or choose speed vs accuracy configurations
  • ⚠️ Opaque Architecture – Context window size and capabilities not exposed to users
  • Simplicity Focus – Hides technical complexity, users ask questions and get answers
  • ⚠️ No Fine-Tuning – Cannot customize model on domain data for specialized responses
  • OpenAI – GPT-5.1 (Optimal/Smart), GPT-4 series
  • Anthropic – Claude 4.5 Opus/Sonnet (Enterprise)
  • Auto-routing – Intelligent model selection for cost/performance
  • Managed – No API keys or fine-tuning required
R A G Capabilities
  • Hybrid Search – Semantic + keyword with Fuzziness slider (0-100)
  • Document Processing – PDF, DOCX, XLSX, CSV, TXT, HTML (20MB)
  • Cloud Integration – Auto 24-hour sync (Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint)
  • ⚠️ Black Box – Vector database, embedding models undisclosed
  • ⚠️ NO Developer Control – Cannot customize retrieval parameters
  • Conversational RAG – Context-aware search over enterprise documents with follow-up support
  • ✅ Auto-Sync – Repositories sync automatically, changes reflected almost instantly
  • Document Formats – PDF, DOCX, PPT, TXT and common enterprise formats supported
  • ⚠️ No Advanced Controls – Chunking, embedding models, similarity thresholds not exposed
  • ⚠️ Limited Transparency – No citation metrics or anti-hallucination details published
  • Closed System – Optimized for internal Q&A, limited visibility into retrieval architecture
  • GPT-4 + RAG – Outperforms OpenAI in independent benchmarks
  • Anti-hallucination – Responses grounded in your content only
  • Automatic citations – Clickable source links in every response
  • Sub-second latency – Optimized vector search and caching
  • Scale to 300M words – No performance degradation at scale
Use Cases
  • Sales Automation – Lead qualification, scoring, enrichment, CRM syncing
  • Customer Support – Email triage, routing, FAQ, escalation
  • Voice Agents (Gaia) – 30+ language phone automation with call transfer
  • ⚠️ NOT Ideal For – Developers needing RAG APIs, EU residency
  • ✅ Internal Knowledge Search – Employees asking questions about company documents and policies
  • ✅ Team Onboarding – New hires finding information without bothering colleagues
  • ✅ Policy Lookup – HR, compliance, operational procedure retrieval for staff
  • ✅ Small European Teams – GDPR-compliant internal search with EU data residency
  • ⚠️ NOT SUITABLE FOR – Public chatbots, customer support, API integrations, multi-channel deployment
  • Customer support – 24/7 AI handling common queries with citations
  • Internal knowledge – HR policies, onboarding, technical docs
  • Sales enablement – Product info, lead qualification, education
  • Documentation – Help centers, FAQs with auto-crawling
  • E-commerce – Product recommendations, order assistance
Security & Compliance
  • SOC 2 Type II + HIPAA with BAA – Independently audited
  • GDPR + PIPEDA + CCPA – Multi-region privacy compliance
  • AES-256 + TLS 1.2+ – Encryption at rest and in transit
  • ⚠️ NO ISO 27001 – May limit enterprise procurement
  • ✅ GDPR Compliance – Germany-based with implicit EU data protection compliance
  • ✅ German Data Residency – EU storage location for regional data sovereignty requirements
  • ✅ Enterprise Privacy – Customer data isolated, encrypted in transit and at rest
  • ✅ Role-Based Access – Built-in controls, admins set document visibility per user
  • ⚠️ Limited Certifications – SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA not publicly documented
  • SOC 2 Type II + GDPR – Regular third-party audits, full EU compliance
  • 256-bit AES encryption – Data at rest; SSL/TLS in transit
  • SSO + 2FA + RBAC – Enterprise access controls with role-based permissions
  • Data isolation – Never trains on customer data
  • Domain allowlisting – Restrict chatbot to approved domains
Pricing & Plans
  • Free: $0 – 400 credits, 1M chars, 1-day logs
  • Pro: $49.99 – 5K credits, 20M chars, phone calls
  • Business: $199.99-$299.99 – 20K-30K credits, 50M chars, branding
  • ⚠️ PRIMARY COMPLAINT – Unpredictable credit consumption difficult to budget
  • Seat-Based Pricing – ~$30 per user per month
  • ✅ Small Team Value – Affordable for teams under 50 users, predictable costs
  • ⚠️ Scalability Cost – 100 users = $3,000/month, expensive for large organizations
  • Unlimited Content – No published document limits, gated only by user seats
  • Free Trial + Enterprise – Evaluation available, custom pricing for volume discounts
  • Standard: $99/mo – 10 chatbots, 60M words, 5K items/bot
  • Premium: $449/mo – 100 chatbots, 300M words, 20K items/bot
  • Enterprise: Custom – SSO, dedicated support, custom SLAs
  • 7-day free trial – Full Standard access, no charges
  • Flat-rate pricing – No per-query charges, no hidden costs
Support & Documentation
  • Lindy Academy – Step-by-step tutorials for business users
  • 100+ Templates – Pre-built workflows for common scenarios
  • Slack + Forum – community.lindy.ai for peer support
  • ⚠️ NO Developer Docs – No API reference or technical architecture
  • ✅ Direct Support – Email, phone, chat with hands-on onboarding approach
  • ✅ Quick Deployment – Minimal admin overhead, connect sources and start asking questions
  • ⚠️ No Open Community – Closed solution, no plug-ins or user extensions
  • ⚠️ No Developer Docs – No API documentation or programmatic access guides
  • Internal Roadmap – Updates from Pyx only, no user-contributed features
  • Documentation hub – Docs, tutorials, API references
  • Support channels – Email, in-app chat, dedicated managers (Premium+)
  • Open-source – Python SDK, Postman, GitHub examples
  • Community – User community + 5,000 Zapier integrations
Limitations & Considerations
  • NO Public REST API – Cannot manage agents programmatically
  • Black Box RAG – Vector database, embeddings undisclosed
  • Search Constraint – Fuzziness <100 limits to 1,500 files
  • Credit Unpredictability – Most common user complaint about costs
  • ⚠️ Platform Mismatch – Workflow automation vs RAG comparison misleading
  • ⚠️ No Public API – Cannot embed or call programmatically, standalone UI only
  • ⚠️ No Messaging Integrations – No Slack, Teams, WhatsApp or chat platform connectors
  • ⚠️ Limited Branding – Minimal customization, not white-label solution for public deployment
  • ⚠️ No Advanced Controls – Cannot configure RAG parameters, model selection, retrieval strategies
  • ⚠️ Seat-Based Scaling – Expensive for large orgs vs usage-based pricing models
  • ✅ Best For – Small European teams (<50 users) prioritizing simplicity and GDPR over flexibility
  • Managed service – Less control over RAG pipeline vs build-your-own
  • Model selection – OpenAI + Anthropic only; no Cohere, AI21, open-source
  • Real-time data – Requires re-indexing; not ideal for live inventory/prices
  • Enterprise features – Custom SSO only on Enterprise plan
Core Chatbot Features
N/A
  • Conversational Search – Context-aware Q&A over enterprise documents with follow-up questions
  • ⚠️ Internal Focus – Designed for knowledge management, no lead capture or human handoff
  • Multi-Language – Likely supports multiple languages, though not a headline feature
  • ⚠️ Basic Analytics – Stores chat history, fewer business insights than customer-facing tools
  • ✅ #1 accuracy – Median 5/5 in independent benchmarks, 10% lower hallucination than OpenAI
  • ✅ Source citations – Every response includes clickable links to original documents
  • ✅ 93% resolution rate – Handles queries autonomously, reducing human workload
  • ✅ 92 languages – Native multilingual support without per-language config
  • ✅ Lead capture – Built-in email collection, custom forms, real-time notifications
  • ✅ Human handoff – Escalation with full conversation context preserved
Customization & Flexibility ( Behavior & Knowledge)
N/A
  • ✅ Auto-Sync Updates – Knowledge base updated without manual uploads or scheduling
  • ⚠️ No Persona Controls – AI voice stays neutral, no tone or behavior customization
  • ✅ Access Controls – Strong role-based permissions, admins set document visibility per user
  • Closed Environment – Great for content updates, limited for AI behavior or deployment
  • Live content updates – Add/remove content with automatic re-indexing
  • System prompts – Shape agent behavior and voice through instructions
  • Multi-agent support – Different bots for different teams
  • Smart defaults – No ML expertise required for custom behavior
Additional Considerations
N/A
  • ✅ No-Fuss Internal Search – Employees use without coding, simple deployment for teams
  • ⚠️ Not Public-Facing – Not ideal for customer chatbots or developer-heavy customization
  • Siloed Environment – Single AI search environment, not broad extensible platform
  • Simpler Scope – Less flexible than CustomGPT, but faster setup for internal use
  • Time-to-value – 2-minute deployment vs weeks with DIY
  • Always current – Auto-updates to latest GPT models
  • Proven scale – 6,000+ organizations, millions of queries
  • Multi-LLM – OpenAI + Claude reduces vendor lock-in

Ready to experience the CustomGPT difference?

Start Free Trial →

Final Thoughts

Final Verdict: Lindy.ai vs Pyx

After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both Lindy.ai and Pyx are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.

When to Choose Lindy.ai

  • You value exceptional no-code usability: 4.9/5 g2 rating, 30-second setup vs 15-60 min with zapier/make
  • Massive integration ecosystem: 5,000+ apps via Pipedream Connect with 2,500+ pre-built actions
  • Claude Sonnet 4.5 default drives 10x customer growth - best-in-class language understanding

Best For: Exceptional no-code usability: 4.9/5 G2 rating, 30-second setup vs 15-60 min with Zapier/Make

When to Choose Pyx

  • You value very quick setup (30-60 minutes)
  • No manual data imports required
  • Excellent ease of use with conversational interface

Best For: Very quick setup (30-60 minutes)

Migration & Switching Considerations

Switching between Lindy.ai and Pyx requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.

Pricing Comparison Summary

Lindy.ai starts at custom pricing, while Pyx begins at $30/month. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.

Our Recommendation Process

  1. Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
  2. Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
  3. Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
  4. Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
  5. Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality

For most organizations, the decision between Lindy.ai and Pyx comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.

📚 Next Steps

Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.

  • Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
  • Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
  • Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
  • Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements

Last updated: February 24, 2026 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.

Ready to Get Started with CustomGPT?

Join thousands of businesses that trust CustomGPT for their AI needs. Choose the path that works best for you.

Why Choose CustomGPT?

97% Accuracy

Industry-leading benchmarks

5-Min Setup

Get started instantly

24/7 Support

Expert help when you need it

Enterprise Ready

Scale with confidence

Trusted by leading companies worldwide

Fortune 500Fortune 500Fortune 500Fortune 500Fortune 500Fortune 500

CustomGPT

The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.

Get in touch
Contact Us

Join the Discussion

Loading comments...

Priyansh Khodiyar's avatar

Priyansh Khodiyar

DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.

Watch: Understanding AI Tool Comparisons