In this comprehensive guide, we compare Lindy.ai and Supavec across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.
Overview
When choosing between Lindy.ai and Supavec, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose Lindy.ai if: you value exceptional no-code usability: 4.9/5 g2 rating, 30-second setup vs 15-60 min with zapier/make
Choose Supavec if: you value 100% open source with no vendor lock-in
About Lindy.ai
Lindy.ai is ai-powered personal assistant for workflow automation. No-code AI agent platform positioning as 'AI employees' for workflow automation, NOT developer-focused RAG platform. 5,000+ integrations via Pipedream, Claude Sonnet 4.5 default, $5.1M revenue (Oct 2024), 4.9/5 G2 rating. Critical limitation: No public API or SDKs available. Founded in 2023, headquartered in San Francisco, CA, USA, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
81/100
Starting Price
Custom
About Supavec
Supavec is the open source rag as a service platform. SupaVec is an open-source RAG platform that serves as an alternative to Carbon.ai. Built on transparency and data sovereignty, it allows developers to build powerful RAG applications with complete control over their infrastructure, supporting any data source at any scale. Founded in 2024, headquartered in Remote, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
84/100
Starting Price
Custom
Key Differences at a Glance
In terms of user ratings, both platforms score similarly in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, pricing is comparable. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: AI Assistant versus RAG Platform. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.
⚠️ What This Comparison Covers
We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.
Detailed Feature Comparison
Lindy.ai
Supavec
CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
Document Formats: PDF, DOCX, XLSX, CSV, TXT, HTML with 20MB per-file size limit
Audio Support: Full audio file support with automatic transcription included in workflow
YouTube Integration: Dedicated action for YouTube transcript extraction and processing
Website Crawling: Single page or full-site crawling with automatic link following capability
Cloud Integrations: Google Drive (including shared drives), OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint, Intercom, Freshdesk with automatic syncing
Automatic Refresh: Knowledge bases refresh every 24 hours automatically with manual 'Resync Knowledge Base' actions for immediate updates
Search Constraint: When search fuzziness drops below 100, searches limited to first 1,500 files - meaningful constraint for large enterprise deployments
Marketing vs Reality: Documentation claims 'no limit to data you can feed' but practical constraints exist around character limits and file counts
No one-click Google Drive or Notion connectors—you’ll script the fetch and hit the API yourself.
Because it’s open source, you can build connectors to anything—Postgres, Mongo, S3, you name it.
Runs on Supabase and scales sideways, chunking millions of docs for fast retrieval.
Lets you ingest more than 1,400 file formats—PDF, DOCX, TXT, Markdown, HTML, and many more—via simple drag-and-drop or API.
Crawls entire sites through sitemaps and URLs, automatically indexing public help-desk articles, FAQs, and docs.
Turns multimedia into text on the fly: YouTube videos, podcasts, and other media are auto-transcribed with built-in OCR and speech-to-text.
View Transcription Guide
Connects to Google Drive, SharePoint, Notion, Confluence, HubSpot, and more through API connectors or Zapier.
See Zapier Connectors
Supports both manual uploads and auto-sync retraining, so your knowledge base always stays up to date.
Integrations & Channels
Conservative Marketing: Platform claims '200+ integrations' but actually offers 5,000+ apps via Pipedream Connect partnership
Pre-Built Actions: 2,500+ ready-to-use actions across Pipedream integration ecosystem
Messaging Platforms: Slack (full integration with triggers/actions), WhatsApp (Personal/Business APIs with templates), Microsoft Teams, Telegram, Discord, Twilio SMS
CRM Systems: Salesforce (24 actions, 8 triggers with SOQL/SOSL queries), HubSpot (deep integration for contacts/tickets/deals), Pipedrive, Zoho CRM
Productivity Tools: Notion (16 actions, 7 triggers), Airtable (full CRUD with webhooks), Google Workspace (Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Sheets, Drive complete integration)
Embedding Options: Popup chat widgets, iFrame embeds, unique public links with domain restriction capabilities
Platform Deployment: Specific instructions available for Webflow, WordPress, Squarespace, Wix, Framer implementations
Webhook Support: Inbound webhooks trigger workflows via POST requests with bearer token authentication
HTTP Actions: Call external APIs from within workflows for custom integration needs
Pure REST for retrieval and generation—no built-in widget or Slack bot.
You code the chat UI or Slack bridge, calling Supavec for answers.
No Zapier—webhooks and automations are DIY inside your app.
If it speaks HTTP, it can talk to Supavec—you just handle the front-end.
Embeds easily—a lightweight script or iframe drops the chat widget into any website or mobile app.
Offers ready-made hooks for Slack, Zendesk, Confluence, YouTube, Sharepoint, 100+ more.
Explore API Integrations
Connects with 5,000+ apps via Zapier and webhooks to automate your workflows.
Supports secure deployments with domain allowlisting and a ChatGPT Plugin for private use cases.
Hosted CustomGPT.ai offers hosted MCP Server with support for Claude Web, Claude Desktop, Cursor, ChatGPT, Windsurf, Trae, etc.
Read more here.
Agent Autonomy Focus: Differentiates through autonomous operation rather than traditional chatbot conversation functionality
Multi-Lingual Support: Voice agents (Gaia) support 30+ languages, transcription covers 50+ languages, text agents operate in 85+ languages with automatic detection
Lead Capture Excellence: Real-time qualification, email/phone validation, firmographic enrichment, UTM attribution, automatic CRM syncing - claims up to 70% higher conversion vs traditional forms
Human Handoff: Configurable escalation conditions with phone agents able to transfer calls directly to human team members with full context
Conversation Memory: Tracks conversation history within and across sessions through memory feature, but differs from typical RAG retrieval - context persists through workflow execution vs vector similarity search
Weekly Digests: Automated email summaries of task usage and agent performance
Agent Evals: Dedicated feature for benchmarking agent performance against quality standards and preventing regression
Workflow-Centric: Emphasizes autonomous task execution over conversational interaction - fundamentally different from chatbot platforms
Stateless RAG Architecture: Pure retrieval and generation without built-in conversation state—developers implement multi-turn context and session management in application layer
Model-Agnostic Generation: Defaults to GPT-3.5 but supports GPT-4, self-hosted LLMs (Llama, Mistral), and any OpenAI-compatible models—no vendor lock-in for generation
Postgres Vector Search: Fast approximate nearest neighbor search using pgvector extension with cosine similarity—handles millions of chunks efficiently at enterprise scale
Metadata Filtering: Custom metadata tagging and filtering capabilities enabling organized knowledge management and multi-tenant architectures
Real-Time Re-Indexing: Almost instant document re-embedding when updating or overwriting knowledge sources—no lengthy reprocessing delays
REST API Foundation: Straightforward endpoints for file uploads, text uploads, and search with plain-JSON responses—easy integration from any programming language
Supabase Integration: Built on Supabase infrastructure leveraging PostgreSQL, Row-Level Security (RLS), and battle-tested backend for familiar deployment
LIMITATION - No Built-In Chat UI: API-only platform requiring developers to build custom chat interfaces—not a turnkey chatbot solution with widgets
LIMITATION - No Lead Capture: No built-in lead generation, email collection, or CRM integration capabilities—must be implemented at application layer
LIMITATION - No Human Handoff: No escalation workflows, live agent transfer, or fallback mechanisms—conversational features are developer responsibility
LIMITATION - No Multi-Channel Integrations: No native Slack, Teams, WhatsApp, or messaging platform connectors—developers build integration layer
LIMITATION - No Session Management: Stateless API design without conversation history tracking or multi-turn context retention—application must manage state
LIMITATION - No Advanced RAG: Missing hybrid search, reranking, knowledge graphs, multi-query retrieval, query expansion found in enterprise platforms
LIMITATION - No Observability Dashboard: No analytics, conversation metrics, or performance monitoring UI—must integrate external logging tools
Custom AI Agents: Build autonomous agents powered by GPT-4 and Claude that can perform tasks independently and make real-time decisions based on business knowledge
Decision-Support Capabilities: AI agents analyze proprietary data to provide insights, recommendations, and actionable responses specific to your business domain
Multi-Agent Systems: Deploy multiple specialized AI agents that can collaborate and optimize workflows in areas like customer support, sales, and internal knowledge management
Memory & Context Management: Agents maintain conversation history and persistent context for coherent multi-turn interactions
View Agent Documentation
Tool Integration: Agents can trigger actions, integrate with external APIs via webhooks, and connect to 5,000+ apps through Zapier for automated workflows
Hyper-Accurate Responses: Leverages advanced RAG technology and retrieval mechanisms to deliver context-aware, citation-backed responses grounded in your knowledge base
Continuous Learning: Agents improve over time through automatic re-indexing of knowledge sources and integration of new data without manual retraining
Customization & Branding
Widget Customization: Display name (e.g., 'Technical Support Assistant'), accent color for brand alignment, logo/icon upload for expanded/collapsed states
Messaging Customization: Custom greeting and callout messages for initial engagement prompts
Domain Restrictions: Specify allowed deployment domains for access control and security
White-Labeling Uncertainty: Documentation doesn't explicitly confirm complete Lindy branding removal - unclear if available outside enterprise agreements
No Deep CSS Control: Limited to essential branding elements vs full CSS customization or brandless deployments on standard plans
Persona Customization: Agent-level prompts define personality, tone, and expertise areas
Settings Context: Persists across all task runs for consistent agent behavior
Per-Run Context: Allows dynamic customization per execution for adaptive responses
Memory Snippets: Learning capability saves preferences like 'Don't schedule meetings before 11am' across all sessions
RBAC Controls: Admins can lock configurations and set credit allocation limits per user or team
No pre-made UI, no theming—branding lives in whatever front-end you create.
Open source means zero “Supavec” label to hide—your app, your look.
Add domain checks or auth however you like in your code.
It’s “white-label” by default because Supavec is API-only.
Fully white-labels the widget—colors, logos, icons, CSS, everything can match your brand.
White-label Options
Provides a no-code dashboard to set welcome messages, bot names, and visual themes.
Lets you shape the AI’s persona and tone using pre-prompts and system instructions.
Uses domain allowlisting to ensure the chatbot appears only on approved sites.
L L M Model Options
Anthropic Claude: Sonnet 4.5 (default - 'almost no one overrides' per Anthropic case study), Sonnet 3.7, Haiku 3.5
Google Gemini: Gemini 2.5 Pro, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Gemini 2.0 Flash for varied performance/cost trade-offs
Default Selection Rationale: Claude Sonnet 4.5 excels at 'navigating ambiguity in large context windows' and handling 'deeply nested data structures requiring nuanced reasoning'
Business Impact: Lindy achieved 10x customer growth after implementing Claude as default LLM
Per-Action Granularity: Users manually select models per workflow step through visual builder interface
Credit Impact: Model selection affects credit consumption - larger models (Sonnet 4.5) consume more credits than smaller models (Haiku 3.5)
No Automatic Routing: No dynamic model switching or automatic model selection based on query complexity
Manual Configuration: Each workflow action requires explicit model selection vs intelligent automatic routing
Model-agnostic: defaults to GPT-3.5, but switch to GPT-4 or any self-hosted model if you’d like.
No fancy toggle—just change a config or prompt path in code.
No extra prompt magic or anti-hallucination layer—plain RAG.
Quality rests on the LLM you choose and how you prompt it.
Taps into top models—OpenAI’s GPT-5.1 series, GPT-4 series, and even Anthropic’s Claude for enterprise needs (4.5 opus and sonnet, etc ).
Automatically balances cost and performance by picking the right model for each request.
Model Selection Details
Uses proprietary prompt engineering and retrieval tweaks to return high-quality, citation-backed answers.
Handles all model management behind the scenes—no extra API keys or fine-tuning steps for you.
Developer Experience ( A P I & S D Ks)
CRITICAL LIMITATION: Lindy deliberately prioritizes no-code accessibility over developer tooling - most significant gap for RAG platform comparison
NO Public REST API: Cannot manage agents, create workflows, or query knowledge base programmatically
NO GraphQL Endpoint: No alternative API architecture available for data querying
NO Official SDKs: No Python, JavaScript, Ruby, Go, or any other language SDK exists
NO OpenAPI/Swagger: No machine-readable API specification for automated client generation
NO CLI Tools: No command-line interface for automation or scripting
NO Developer Console: No API sandbox or testing environment available
Available Workarounds: Inbound webhooks (external systems trigger workflows via POST with bearer token), HTTP Request actions (call external APIs from workflows), Code Action (run Python/JavaScript in E2B sandboxes ~150ms startup), Callback URLs (bidirectional webhook communication)
Minimal GitHub Presence: github.com/lindy-ai contains only 3 repositories - build caching utility, ML engineer hiring challenge, no public SDKs or integration libraries
Documentation Quality: User-focused Lindy Academy with step-by-step tutorials, but NO API reference, code samples, or technical architecture documentation
Developer Path: For programmatic RAG control, custom retrieval pipelines, or embedding integration - Lindy offers no viable path forward
Straightforward REST endpoints for file uploads, text uploads, and search.
[Examples]
No official SDKs—use fetch/axios or roll your own wrapper.
Docs are concise with JS snippets; Postman collection included.
Full source is on GitHub, welcoming community tweaks.
Ships a well-documented REST API for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data, and querying chat.
API Documentation
Backs you up with cookbooks, code samples, and step-by-step guides for every skill level.
Performance & Accuracy
Hybrid Search: Semantic + keyword search with configurable 'Search Fuzziness' (0-100 scale) - at 100 (pure semantic) no file limit, lower values add keyword matching but limit to 1,500 files
Default Results: 4 search results returned (adjustable up to 10 maximum)
Vector Database: NOT disclosed - no documentation mentions Pinecone, Chroma, Qdrant, or any specific vector store
Embedding Models: Undocumented - no information about which embedding models power semantic search
Hallucination Reduction: Architectural constraints vs retrieval optimization - 'poor man's RLHF' with human confirmation before action execution
Learning Integration: Corrections from feedback embedded in vector storage for future retrieval improvement
Structured Workflows: 'Agents on rails' philosophy constrains LLM behavior through predefined workflow steps
NO Published Benchmarks: No RAG accuracy metrics, retrieval precision/recall scores, or latency measurements available
Black Box Implementation: RAG treated as opaque system - no transparency into vector similarity scores, embedding quality, or retrieval mechanisms
Enterprise Concern: Opacity may concern organizations requiring transparency into AI decision-making for compliance or auditing
Accuracy = GPT quality + standard RAG lift—no extra guardrails.
Postgres vector search keeps retrieval snappy, even with millions of chunks.
No public head-to-head benchmarks yet; expect “typical GPT-3.5/4 RAG” results.
If you want citations or extra checks, you’ll prompt-engineer them yourself.
Delivers sub-second replies with an optimized pipeline—efficient vector search, smart chunking, and caching.
Independent tests rate median answer accuracy at 5/5—outpacing many alternatives.
Benchmark Results
Always cites sources so users can verify facts on the spot.
Maintains speed and accuracy even for massive knowledge bases with tens of millions of words.
Customization & Flexibility
Knowledge Updates: Automatic refresh every 24 hours for all connected cloud sources
Manual Resync: 'Resync Knowledge Base' actions available for immediate updates when needed
Cloud Source Syncing: Google Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint, Intercom, Freshdesk automatically stay current
Settings Context: Agent-level configuration persists across all task runs for consistent behavior
Per-Run Context: Dynamic customization per execution allows adaptive agent responses
Memory Snippets: Learning preferences saved across sessions (e.g., scheduling constraints, communication style preferences)
Workflow Customization: Visual builder allows business users to modify agent logic without coding
Agent Personality: Configurable tone, expertise areas, and communication style through prompt configuration
No Embedding Control: Cannot customize embedding models, vector similarity thresholds, or retrieval parameters
Limited Developer Flexibility: Black-box RAG implementation prevents optimization of retrieval pipeline or tuning of vector search
N/A
N/A
Pricing & Scalability
Free Plan: $0/month, 400 credits, 1M character knowledge base, basic automations with 100+ integrations
Pro Plan: $49.99/month, 5,000 credits, 20M character knowledge base, phone calls, full integrations, Lindy branding on embed
Business Plans: $199.99-$299.99/month, 20,000-30,000 credits, 50M character knowledge base, custom branding, 30+ languages, unlimited calls
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing with SSO, SCIM provisioning, dedicated support, custom training
Additional Costs: Phone calls $0.19/minute (GPT-4o), team members $19.99/member/month (Pro/Business), custom automation building $500 one-time, credits $19-$1,199/month (10,000-1,000,000 credits)
Credit Consumption: Varies by model choice and complexity - larger models (Claude Sonnet 4.5) consume more credits than smaller models
Primary User Complaint: Unpredictable costs - credit depletion speed consistently frustrating in reviews, particularly for complex workflows with premium actions
Pricing Transparency Issue: Credit system creates forecasting difficulty vs fixed per-seat or usage-based pricing
Scalability: Character limits constrain large knowledge bases - 50M character cap on Business tier may limit enterprise deployments
MIT-licensed open source: self-host for free (pay your own infra).
Need more calls? Negotiate or self-host to ditch caps.
Storage isn’t metered—only query volume counts toward the plan.
Runs on straightforward subscriptions: Standard (~$99/mo), Premium (~$449/mo), and customizable Enterprise plans.
Gives generous limits—Standard covers up to 60 million words per bot, Premium up to 300 million—all at flat monthly rates.
View Pricing
Handles scaling for you: the managed cloud infra auto-scales with demand, keeping things fast and available.
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 Type II: Certified by Johanson Group audit - independently validated security controls
HIPAA Compliant: Business Associate Agreement (BAA) available for healthcare deployments
GDPR Compliant: EU data protection and privacy rights compliance
PIPEDA Compliant: Canadian Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act
CCPA Compliant: California Consumer Privacy Act compliance
No AI Training: Customer data NEVER used for AI model training - explicitly stated in privacy policy
Encryption: AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.2+ in transit for comprehensive data protection
Infrastructure: Google Cloud Platform hosting with multi-zone redundancy for high availability
Backups: Daily encrypted backups with secure key management
Access Controls: RBAC (Role-Based Access Control), MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication), Enterprise SSO via existing identity providers, SCIM provisioning for automated user lifecycle
Audit Logs: Track agent activity, data access, configuration changes - available on Business/Enterprise plans
Data Residency Limitation: US-based only - no explicit EU data residency option documented (enterprise inquiries required for region-specific deployments)
No ISO 27001: Information security management certification not documented
Self-hosting keeps everything on your servers—great for tight compliance.
[Privacy note]
Hosted Supavec runs on Supabase with row-level security—each team’s data is fenced off.
No training on your docs—data stays yours.
Enterprises can go dedicated or on-prem for HIPAA/GDPR peace of mind.
Protects data in transit with SSL/TLS and at rest with 256-bit AES encryption.
Holds SOC 2 Type II certification and complies with GDPR, so your data stays isolated and private.
Security Certifications
Offers fine-grained access controls—RBAC, two-factor auth, and SSO integration—so only the right people get in.
Error Tracking: Built-in retry mechanisms with detailed failure monitoring and debugging
Trigger History: Task completion logs track every workflow execution and result
Qualification Metrics: Lead conversion rates and response time tracking for sales/marketing workflows
Completion Rates: Workflow success measurement and handling time analysis
Weekly Digests: Automated email summaries of task usage delivered to administrators
Agent Evals: Benchmarking feature against quality standards with regression prevention
Log Retention: 1 day (Free tier - severely constrains troubleshooting) to 30+ days (Enterprise tier)
Audit Logs: User actions, data access, configuration changes tracked on Business/Enterprise plans
Export Capabilities: Available but SIEM integration specifics require sales confirmation
No RAG-Specific Metrics: Cannot track retrieval precision, recall, embedding quality, or vector similarity scores
Workflow-Centric: Focuses on output quality rather than retrieval precision - notable gap for RAG-specific monitoring vs platforms like LangSmith or Arize
No dashboard baked in—log requests yourself or use Supabase metrics when self-hosting.
Hosted plan shows basic call counts; no transcript analytics out of the box.
Need deep insights? Wire up your own monitoring layer.
Designed to play nicely with external logging tools, not ship its own.
Comes with a real-time analytics dashboard tracking query volumes, token usage, and indexing status.
Lets you export logs and metrics via API to plug into third-party monitoring or BI tools.
Analytics API
Provides detailed insights for troubleshooting and ongoing optimization.
Market Differentiation: Computer Use capability unique among no-code automation platforms - significant competitive advantage
N/A
N/A
Additional Considerations
Best Use Cases: Operations teams automating repetitive workflows without developer resources - lead qualification, email triage, meeting scheduling, CRM updates, customer support routing excel
Primary Strength: Zero-training deployment with Agent Builder ('vibe coding') creates sophisticated automations in 30 seconds vs 15-60 minutes with Zapier/Make for equivalent workflows
Unique Capabilities: Autopilot (Computer Use) enables automations impossible through traditional integrations - can interact with any web-based application without published APIs through AI-powered browser control
Multi-Agent Societies: Multiple specialized Lindies collaborate on complex tasks through delegation rules - Sales (SDR → AE → CS), Support (Triage → Technical → Escalation), Research with specialized investigators
Credit-Based Pricing Reality: Most common user complaint is unpredictable costs - 'credits consumed quickly and unpredictably' makes budget forecasting difficult vs fixed per-seat or usage-based pricing in competitors
Enterprise Limitations: Character limits (50M cap on Business tier) may constrain large deployments, US-only data residency blocks EU customers with strict localization requirements, no ISO 27001 certification may limit procurement
Developer Friction: Deliberately prioritizes no-code accessibility over developer tooling - NO public REST API, NO SDKs, NO CLI tools, NO programmatic RAG control makes it unsuitable for API-first use cases
Support Inconsistency: User reviews note 'inconsistent responsiveness on lower tiers' and 'writing to support twice with no response' - support quality varies significantly by plan tier
Platform Comparison Warning: Fundamentally different architecture from RAG-as-a-Service platforms - comparing Lindy to CustomGPT is misleading as they serve different product categories (workflow automation vs knowledge retrieval)
No vendor lock-in: transparent code, offline option, host wherever you like.
Focuses on core RAG—no SSO, dashboards, or fancy UI included.
Great for devs who want full control or must keep data in-house.
Conversation flow, advanced prompts, fancy UI—all yours to build.
Slashes engineering overhead with an all-in-one RAG platform—no in-house ML team required.
Gets you to value quickly: launch a functional AI assistant in minutes.
Stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements, so you’re always on the latest tech.
Balances top-tier accuracy with ease of use, perfect for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects.
Core Chatbot Features
Chatbot vs Agent Philosophy: Lindy differentiates through autonomous agent operation rather than traditional chatbot conversation - emphasizes task execution over conversational interaction
Multi-Lingual Voice Agents (Gaia): 30+ language support for voice agents, transcription covers 50+ languages, text agents operate in 85+ languages with automatic detection - no manual language configuration required
Lead Capture Excellence: Real-time qualification with email/phone validation, firmographic enrichment, UTM attribution tracking, automatic CRM syncing - claims up to 70% higher conversion vs traditional forms
Human Handoff Logic: Configurable escalation conditions with phone agents able to transfer calls directly to human team members with full conversation context and history preservation
Conversation Memory System: Tracks conversation history within and across sessions through memory feature - context persists through workflow execution vs vector similarity search in traditional RAG systems
Analytics & Performance Tracking: Qualification rates, response times, completion rates, handling times monitored comprehensively with weekly automated email summaries of task usage and agent performance
Agent Evals Feature: Dedicated benchmarking system for measuring agent performance against quality standards and preventing regression over time with automated quality monitoring
Workflow-Centric Design: Emphasizes autonomous task execution over conversational chatbot patterns - structured workflows with 'agents on rails' philosophy constraining LLM behavior through predefined steps
Hallucination Prevention: Architectural constraints vs retrieval optimization - 'poor man's RLHF' with human confirmation before action execution prevents costly mistakes
Learning Integration: Corrections from user feedback embedded in vector storage for future retrieval improvement - system learns from mistakes through Memory Snippets saving preferences like scheduling constraints
Just the essentials: retrieve chunks + LLM answer. Calls are stateless, no baked-in chat history.
No lead capture or human handoff—add those in your own layer.
Pulls the right text fast, then lets your LLM craft the reply.
Perfect if you only need raw RAG and will build the conversation bits yourself.
Reduces hallucinations by grounding replies in your data and adding source citations for transparency.
Benchmark Details
Handles multi-turn, context-aware chats with persistent history and solid conversation management.
Speaks 90+ languages, making global rollouts straightforward.
Includes extras like lead capture (email collection) and smooth handoff to a human when needed.
Behavior Customization Layers: Settings Context (agent-level configuration persisting across all task runs), Per-Run Context (dynamic customization per execution for adaptive responses), Memory Snippets (learning preferences saved across sessions)
Workflow Flexibility: Visual builder allows business users to modify agent logic without coding - drag-and-drop interface for conversation flows, conditional logic, API integrations, data transformations
Agent Personality Configuration: Configurable tone, expertise areas, communication style through prompt configuration - define professional vs casual voice, technical depth, response verbosity
Knowledge Base Management: Automatic refresh every 24 hours for all connected cloud sources (Google Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint, Intercom, Freshdesk) with manual 'Resync Knowledge Base' actions for immediate updates
Search Fuzziness Controls: Configurable slider (0-100 scale) balancing semantic vs keyword search - at 100 (pure semantic) no file limit, lower values add keyword matching but constrain to 1,500 files
Retrieval Configuration: Default 4 search results returned (adjustable up to 10 maximum) with hybrid search combining semantic similarity and keyword matching for precision
RBAC Controls: Admins can lock configurations and set credit allocation limits per user or team - prevents unauthorized changes and controls spending across organization
CRITICAL LIMITATION - No Embedding Control: Cannot customize embedding models, vector similarity thresholds, or retrieval parameters - black-box RAG implementation prevents optimization of retrieval pipeline
Developer Flexibility Gap: No programmatic access to knowledge base management, no API for document upload or retrieval configuration, no ability to tune vector search parameters or chunking strategies
Upload or overwrite docs any time—re-embeds almost instantly.
Behavior lives in your prompts; there’s no GUI for personas.
Multi-lingual works fine—just tell the LLM in your prompt.
Add metadata, tweak chunking—then build logic around it as needed.
Lets you add, remove, or tweak content on the fly—automatic re-indexing keeps everything current.
Shapes agent behavior through system prompts and sample Q&A, ensuring a consistent voice and focus.
Learn How to Update Sources
Supports multiple agents per account, so different teams can have their own bots.
Balances hands-on control with smart defaults—no deep ML expertise required to get tailored behavior.
Multi- Agent Collaboration
Societies of Lindies: Multiple specialized agents collaborate on complex tasks through delegation rules
Agent Specialization: Each Lindy can have unique expertise, knowledge base access, and capabilities
Delegation Rules: Define when and how agents hand off tasks to specialized team members
Workflow Orchestration: Coordinate multi-step processes across different agent specializations
Context Preservation: Full conversation and task history passed between collaborating agents
Use Cases: Sales (SDR → Account Executive → Customer Success), Support (Triage → Technical → Escalation), Complex research with specialized investigators
Learning Across Agents: Feedback and corrections shared across agent society for collective improvement
Sophisticated Workflows: Enable enterprise-grade automation previously requiring human coordination
Agent Builder Integration: Natural language creation of multi-agent systems vs manual workflow mapping
N/A
N/A
Lead Capture & Conversion
Real-Time Qualification: AI evaluates lead quality during initial conversation vs post-submission scoring
Email/Phone Validation: Automatic verification prevents fake submissions and improves data quality
Firmographic Enrichment: Company data appended to leads automatically (size, industry, revenue, etc.)
UTM Attribution: Marketing source tracking preserved through entire lead journey
Automatic CRM Syncing: Qualified leads flow directly to Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho without manual data entry
Conversion Claims: Up to 70% higher conversion vs traditional forms (vendor claim - not independently validated)
Conversational Forms: Natural dialogue collection vs static form fields improves completion rates
Routing Logic: Automatically assign leads to appropriate sales reps based on territory, product interest, company size
Follow-Up Automation: Trigger email sequences, meeting scheduling, nurture campaigns based on qualification results
N/A
N/A
R A G-as-a- Service Assessment
Platform Type: NOT A RAG-AS-A-SERVICE PLATFORM - No-code AI agent/workflow automation platform targeting business users vs developers
Critical Distinction: Lindy prioritizes business user accessibility over programmatic RAG control - fundamentally different design philosophy
RAG Implementation: Black-box hybrid search (semantic + keyword) with configurable fuzziness but no exposed retrieval controls
Vector Database: Undisclosed - no documentation of Pinecone, Chroma, Qdrant, or specific vector store
Embedding Models: Undocumented - no information about which models power semantic search
API Availability: NO public REST API, GraphQL endpoint, or official SDKs for programmatic access
Developer Tools: NO OpenAPI spec, CLI tools, developer console, API sandbox, or technical documentation
Benchmarks: No published RAG accuracy, latency, or performance metrics available
Target Audience: Operations teams automating workflows vs developers building custom RAG applications
Use Case Mismatch: Comparing Lindy to CustomGPT.ai is architecturally misleading - fundamentally different product categories serving different user personas
Platform Type: TRUE RAG-AS-A-SERVICE API - Lightweight MIT-licensed open-source RAG backend built on Supabase with self-hosting capability and minimal API surface
Core Mission: Provide transparent, open-source alternative to proprietary RAG services (Carbon.ai shutdown response) with full cost control and no vendor lock-in
Target Market: Developers building custom RAG applications on budget, startups minimizing costs with self-hosting, organizations requiring data sovereignty with Supabase infrastructure
RAG Implementation: Standard RAG architecture with document chunking, OpenAI embeddings, Postgres pgvector semantic search—focused on simplicity over advanced techniques
API-First Design: Pure REST API for retrieval and generation without GUI, widgets, or conversational features—intentionally minimal abstraction for developer control
Self-Hosting Advantage: MIT license enables complete on-premises deployment keeping all data on your servers—ideal for GDPR, HIPAA, data residency compliance
Managed Service Option: Cloud-hosted plans (Free: 100 calls/month, Basic: $190/year for 750 calls/month, Enterprise: $1,490/year for 5K calls/month) eliminate infrastructure management
Pricing Model: Free self-hosting (MIT license) or extremely affordable hosted plans—40-90% cheaper than commercial RAG platforms with no per-document charges or user seat fees
Data Sources: File uploads (PDF, Markdown, TXT) via REST API or raw text ingestion—NO pre-built Google Drive, Notion, or cloud storage connectors (manual scripting required)
Model Flexibility: Model-agnostic with GPT-3.5 default, GPT-4, or self-hosted LLM support—users connect own OpenAI API keys without Supavec markup on AI costs
Security Foundation: Supabase Row-Level Security (RLS) for multi-tenant data isolation, HTTPS encryption, AES-256 at-rest encryption—self-hosting enables GDPR/HIPAA compliance
Support Model: Community GitHub/Discord support for free tier, email support for paid plans—no dedicated CSMs, SLAs, or enterprise account management
Open-Source Ecosystem: Transparent code on GitHub welcoming PRs, forks, and community contributions—no proprietary components or vendor lock-in
LIMITATION - Developer-Only Platform: Requires coding skills for setup, integration, and maintenance—non-technical teams cannot use without developer support
LIMITATION - Basic RAG Features: Standard retrieval without hybrid search, reranking, knowledge graphs, multi-query fusion, or hallucination detection—advanced features require custom development
LIMITATION - No Turnkey Features: No GUI dashboard, conversation management, lead capture, analytics, or multi-channel integrations—pure RAG API requiring application layer development
Comparison Validity: Architectural comparison to full-featured chatbot platforms like CustomGPT.ai requires context—Supavec is lightweight RAG backend API vs complete no-code chatbot builder
Use Case Fit: Perfect for developers wanting lightweight RAG backend without heavy frameworks, startups minimizing costs with Supabase self-hosting, teams building custom chatbots needing simple REST API for retrieval without paying for unused dashboard features
Core Architecture: Serverless RAG infrastructure with automatic embedding generation, vector search optimization, and LLM orchestration fully managed behind API endpoints
API-First Design: Comprehensive REST API with well-documented endpoints for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data (1,400+ formats), and querying chat
API Documentation
Developer Experience: Open-source Python SDK (customgpt-client), Postman collections, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, and extensive cookbooks for rapid integration
No-Code Alternative: Wizard-style web dashboard enables non-developers to upload content, brand widgets, and deploy chatbots without touching code
Hybrid Target Market: Serves both developer teams wanting robust APIs AND business users seeking no-code RAG deployment - unique positioning vs pure API platforms (Cohere) or pure no-code tools (Jotform)
RAG Technology Leadership: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, proprietary anti-hallucination mechanisms, and citation-backed responses
Benchmark Details
Deployment Flexibility: Cloud-hosted SaaS with auto-scaling, API integrations, embedded chat widgets, ChatGPT Plugin support, and hosted MCP Server for Claude/Cursor/ChatGPT
Enterprise Readiness: SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling, domain allowlisting, RBAC with 2FA/SSO, and flat-rate pricing without per-query charges
Use Case Fit: Ideal for organizations needing both rapid no-code deployment AND robust API capabilities, teams handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), and businesses requiring production-ready RAG without building ML infrastructure from scratch
Competitive Positioning: Bridges the gap between developer-first platforms (Cohere, Deepset) requiring heavy coding and no-code chatbot builders (Jotform, Kommunicate) lacking API depth - offers best of both worlds
Competitive Positioning
Primary Advantage: Exceptional no-code usability (4.9/5 G2) with 5,000+ integrations via Pipedream and Autopilot (Computer Use) unique capabilities
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Default: Best-in-class language understanding driving 10x customer growth - 'almost no one overrides' per Anthropic
Multi-Agent Sophistication: Societies of Lindies enable complex task delegation impossible with single-bot platforms
Strong Compliance: SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA with BAA, GDPR, PIPEDA, CCPA enables regulated industry adoption
Financial Validation: $5.1M revenue (Oct 2024), $50M+ funding from Menlo Ventures, Battery Ventures, Coatue validates market fit
Setup Speed: 30 seconds vs 15-60 minutes with Zapier/Make - dramatic productivity advantage for business users
Primary Challenge: NOT a developer-focused RAG platform - no API, no SDKs, opaque RAG implementation blocks technical evaluation
Pricing Unpredictability: Credit-based model most common user complaint - costs difficult to forecast vs fixed tiers
Data Residency Limitation: US-only hosting blocks EU customers with strict data localization requirements
Market Position: Competes with Zapier, Make, n8n for workflow automation budget vs RAG API platforms (CustomGPT.ai, Pinecone Assistant)
Use Case Fit: Exceptional for business users automating workflows without developers; poor fit for developers requiring programmatic RAG capabilities
Comparison Warning: Direct feature comparison with RAG-as-a-Service platforms is misleading - different product categories, target audiences, and value propositions
Market position: MIT-licensed open-source RAG API built on Supabase, offering lightweight alternative to Carbon.ai with self-hosting capability and minimal API surface
Target customers: Developers building custom RAG applications on budget, startups wanting to avoid RAG platform costs, and organizations requiring self-hosted solutions with Supabase infrastructure for data sovereignty
Key competitors: Carbon.ai, LangChain, SimplyRetrieve, and hosted RAG APIs like CustomGPT/Pinecone Assistant
Competitive advantages: MIT open-source license with no vendor lock-in, Supabase foundation for familiar infrastructure, model-agnostic with easy LLM swapping (GPT-3.5, GPT-4, self-hosted), REST API simplicity with straightforward endpoints, privacy-focused with self-hosting option keeping data on your servers, and minimal abstraction enabling deep customization
Pricing advantage: Free (MIT license) for self-hosting; hosted plans extremely affordable ($190/year Basic for 750 calls/month, $1,490/year Enterprise for 5K calls/month); best value for low-volume applications or teams with Supabase expertise wanting to avoid expensive RAG platforms; 40-90% cheaper than commercial alternatives
Use case fit: Perfect for developers wanting lightweight RAG backend without heavy frameworks, startups minimizing costs with self-hosting on existing Supabase infrastructure, and teams building custom chatbot front-ends needing simple REST API for retrieval without paying for unused dashboard features
Market position: Leading all-in-one RAG platform balancing enterprise-grade accuracy with developer-friendly APIs and no-code usability for rapid deployment
Target customers: Mid-market to enterprise organizations needing production-ready AI assistants, development teams wanting robust APIs without building RAG infrastructure, and businesses requiring 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription (YouTube, podcasts)
Key competitors: OpenAI Assistants API, Botsonic, Chatbase.co, Azure AI, and custom RAG implementations using LangChain
Competitive advantages: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling included, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, hosted MCP Server support (Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT), generous data limits (60M words Standard, 300M Premium), and flat monthly pricing without per-query charges
Pricing advantage: Transparent flat-rate pricing at $99/month (Standard) and $449/month (Premium) with generous included limits; no hidden costs for API access, branding removal, or basic features; best value for teams needing both no-code dashboard and developer APIs in one platform
Use case fit: Ideal for businesses needing both rapid no-code deployment and robust API capabilities, organizations handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), teams requiring white-label chatbots with source citations for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects, and companies wanting all-in-one RAG without managing ML infrastructure
A I Models
Default Model - Claude Sonnet 4.5: Primary LLM 'almost no one overrides' according to Anthropic case study - excels at navigating ambiguity in large context windows
Anthropic Claude Family: Sonnet 4.5 (default, best performance), Sonnet 3.7 (balanced), Haiku 3.5 (fast, cost-effective) with 200K token context windows
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Rationale: Selected for 'navigating ambiguity in large context windows' and handling 'deeply nested data structures requiring nuanced reasoning'
Business Impact: Lindy achieved 10x customer growth after implementing Claude as default LLM - significant competitive advantage
Model Switching: Each workflow action requires explicit model selection - no automatic routing based on query complexity or cost optimization
No Dynamic Model Routing: Cannot intelligently switch between models based on task requirements - manual configuration only vs AI-powered model selection
Limited Model Experimentation: No A/B testing capabilities or automatic model performance comparison across different LLMs
Model-agnostic architecture: Defaults to GPT-3.5 Turbo for cost-effectiveness, with full support for GPT-4, GPT-4-turbo, and any OpenAI-compatible models
Self-hosted model support: Bring your own LLM - compatible with self-hosted models like Llama, Mistral, or custom fine-tuned models via API endpoints
No model lock-in: Switch between models by changing configuration or prompt path in code without platform restrictions
No markup on AI costs: Users connect their own OpenAI API keys or self-hosted endpoints, paying providers directly without Supavec markup
Note: No built-in model routing: No automatic model selection or load balancing - developers must implement routing logic manually
Note: No prompt optimization layer: Plain RAG implementation without advanced prompt engineering or anti-hallucination guardrails
Quality dependency: Output quality rests entirely on chosen LLM and developer's prompt engineering skills
Primary models: GPT-5.1 and 4 series from OpenAI, and Anthropic's Claude 4.5 (opus and sonnet) for enterprise needs
Automatic model selection: Balances cost and performance by automatically selecting the appropriate model for each request
Model Selection Details
Proprietary optimizations: Custom prompt engineering and retrieval enhancements for high-quality, citation-backed answers
Managed infrastructure: All model management handled behind the scenes - no API keys or fine-tuning required from users
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms ensure chatbot only answers based on provided content, improving trust and factual accuracy
Search Fuzziness: 100 = pure semantic search (no file limit), lower values add keyword matching but limit to first 1,500 files - trade-off between precision and scale
Default Retrieval: 4 search results returned per query (adjustable up to 10 maximum) for context-aware responses
Document Processing: PDF, DOCX, XLSX, CSV, TXT, HTML with 20MB per-file size limit and automatic text extraction
Audio & Video: Full audio file support with automatic transcription, YouTube transcript extraction via dedicated action
Website Crawling: Single page or full-site crawling with automatic link following and sitemap discovery
Cloud Integration: Google Drive (shared drives), OneDrive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint, Intercom, Freshdesk with automatic 24-hour sync
Manual Refresh: 'Resync Knowledge Base' actions for immediate updates when 24-hour sync insufficient
Vector Database: NOT disclosed - no documentation mentions Pinecone, Chroma, Qdrant, or proprietary implementation
Embedding Models: Undocumented - no information about which embedding models power semantic search or customization options
Chunking Strategy: Not configurable - automatic text segmentation with undisclosed chunk size and overlap parameters
Hallucination Reduction: 'Agents on rails' philosophy constrains LLM behavior through predefined workflow steps - architectural constraints vs retrieval optimization
Learning Integration: Human feedback corrections embedded in vector storage for future retrieval improvement
CRITICAL LIMITATION - Black Box Implementation: RAG treated as opaque system - no transparency into vector similarity scores, embedding quality, retrieval mechanisms
CRITICAL LIMITATION - No Published Benchmarks: No RAG accuracy metrics, retrieval precision/recall scores, or latency measurements available
CRITICAL LIMITATION - No Developer Control: Cannot customize embedding models, similarity thresholds, reranking, or retrieval parameters
Enterprise Concern: Opacity may concern organizations requiring transparency into AI decision-making for compliance auditing or regulatory requirements
Standard RAG architecture: Document chunking with vector embeddings stored in Postgres pgvector extension for semantic search
Embedding generation: Automatic embedding creation during document upload using OpenAI embedding models or custom embedding endpoints
Vector search: Postgres vector search with cosine similarity for retrieval, handling millions of chunks efficiently
Re-indexing speed: Almost instant document re-embedding when updating or overwriting knowledge sources
Metadata support: Custom metadata tagging and filtering capabilities for organized knowledge management
Note: No advanced RAG features: No hybrid search (semantic + keyword), no reranking, no multi-query retrieval, no query expansion
Note: No hallucination detection: No built-in citation validation, factual consistency scoring, or confidence thresholds - developers must implement manually
Note: No retrieval parameter controls: Chunking strategy, similarity thresholds, and top-k configuration require code-level changes
Core architecture: GPT-4 combined with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology, outperforming OpenAI in RAG benchmarks
RAG Performance
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms reduce hallucinations and ensure responses are grounded in provided content
Benchmark Details
Automatic citations: Each response includes clickable citations pointing to original source documents for transparency and verification
Optimized pipeline: Efficient vector search, smart chunking, and caching for sub-second reply times
Scalability: Maintains speed and accuracy for massive knowledge bases with tens of millions of words
Context-aware conversations: Multi-turn conversations with persistent history and comprehensive conversation management
Source verification: Always cites sources so users can verify facts on the spot
Use Cases
Primary Use Case: No-code workflow automation for operations teams, sales teams, marketing teams requiring AI-powered task execution without developers
Sales Automation: Lead qualification with real-time scoring, email/phone validation, firmographic enrichment, CRM syncing (Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive)
Customer Support: Email triage, ticket routing, FAQ responses, escalation workflows with human handoff and context transfer
Healthcare: Patient appointment scheduling, medical record processing (HIPAA-compliant), insurance verification, billing automation
Legal: Document review, contract analysis, case research, deadline tracking with confidentiality controls
Voice Agents (Gaia): Phone call automation with 30+ language support, call transcription in 50+ languages, call transfer to humans
Team Sizes: Individual contributors to enterprise teams (1-500+ users) - scales from solopreneurs to Fortune 500 companies
Industries: Technology, professional services, healthcare, legal, financial services, e-commerce, real estate - any industry with repetitive workflows
Implementation Speed: 30 seconds with Agent Builder ('vibe coding') vs 15-60 minutes with Zapier/Make - fastest setup in automation category
NOT Ideal For: Developers needing programmatic RAG APIs, custom retrieval pipeline tuning, embedding model experimentation, transparent RAG implementation details, organizations requiring EU data residency
Custom chatbot backends: Ideal for developers building custom chat interfaces needing simple RAG API without heavy platform overhead
Self-hosted knowledge retrieval: Perfect for organizations requiring data sovereignty with Supabase infrastructure for compliance (GDPR, HIPAA when self-hosted)
Budget-conscious RAG applications: Startups and small teams minimizing costs with MIT open-source license and affordable hosted plans ($190-$1,490/year)
Supabase-native projects: Teams already using Supabase can integrate Supavec seamlessly without additional infrastructure complexity
Developer-first RAG: Code-first teams wanting full control over RAG implementation, eschewing GUI dashboards for API-driven workflows
Not ideal for: Non-technical users requiring no-code interfaces, enterprises needing advanced RAG features (hybrid search, reranking), or teams requiring built-in analytics/monitoring
Not ideal for: Production applications requiring hallucination detection, citation validation, or confidence scoring without custom development
Customer support automation: AI assistants handling common queries, reducing support ticket volume, providing 24/7 instant responses with source citations
Internal knowledge management: Employee self-service for HR policies, technical documentation, onboarding materials, company procedures across 1,400+ file formats
Sales enablement: Product information chatbots, lead qualification, customer education with white-labeled widgets on websites and apps
Documentation assistance: Technical docs, help centers, FAQs with automatic website crawling and sitemap indexing
Educational platforms: Course materials, research assistance, student support with multimedia content (YouTube transcriptions, podcasts)
Healthcare information: Patient education, medical knowledge bases (SOC 2 Type II compliant for sensitive data)
E-commerce: Product recommendations, order assistance, customer inquiries with API integration to 5,000+ apps via Zapier
SaaS onboarding: User guides, feature explanations, troubleshooting with multi-agent support for different teams
Security & Compliance
SOC 2 Type II Certified: Independently audited by Johanson Group validating security controls for data protection, availability, processing integrity
HIPAA Compliant: Business Associate Agreement (BAA) available for healthcare organizations handling Protected Health Information (PHI)
GDPR Compliant: EU General Data Protection Regulation compliance with data processing agreements, right to deletion, consent management
PIPEDA Compliant: Canadian Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act for Canadian customer data
CCPA Compliant: California Consumer Privacy Act compliance for California residents with data access/deletion rights
No AI Training on Customer Data: Explicitly stated in privacy policy - customer data NEVER used for AI model training or improvement
Encryption Standards: AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.2+ in transit for comprehensive data protection across all storage and transmission
Infrastructure: Google Cloud Platform hosting with multi-zone redundancy for 99.9%+ uptime and disaster recovery
Daily Backups: Encrypted backups with secure key management and point-in-time recovery capabilities
Access Controls: RBAC (Role-Based Access Control), MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication), audit logs tracking agent activity and data access
Enterprise SSO: Single Sign-On via existing identity providers (Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace) for centralized authentication
SCIM Provisioning: Automated user lifecycle management with automatic provisioning/deprovisioning for enterprise security
Admin Controls: Lock configurations, set credit allocation limits per user/team, monitor usage for cost control and security
Audit Logs: Track agent activity, data access, configuration changes on Business/Enterprise plans for compliance and security monitoring
Log Retention: 1 day (Free - severely limits troubleshooting), 7-30 days (Pro/Business), 30+ days (Enterprise with custom retention)
LIMITATION - No ISO 27001: Information Security Management System certification not documented - may limit enterprise procurement
LIMITATION - US Data Residency Only: No explicit EU data residency option documented - enterprise inquiries required for region-specific deployments
LIMITATION - Free Tier Log Retention: 1 day severely constrains security incident investigation and compliance auditing vs 30+ day industry standard
Self-hosting advantage: MIT license enables complete data sovereignty - all data stays on your servers for strict compliance requirements
[Privacy note]
Supabase security foundation: Row-level security (RLS) fences off each team's data when using hosted Supavec on Supabase infrastructure
No model training: Your documents never used for LLM training - data remains yours with zero retention by OpenAI or other providers
GDPR/HIPAA ready: Self-hosting enables GDPR and HIPAA compliance when deployed on compliant infrastructure - enterprises can go dedicated or on-premises
Encryption: Standard HTTPS encryption for API calls; at-rest encryption depends on hosting infrastructure (Supabase provides AES-256)
Note: No SOC 2 certification: Open-source project lacks formal SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, or other enterprise compliance certifications for hosted plans
Note: No built-in access controls: Authentication, authorization, and RBAC must be implemented by developers in their application layer
Note: Limited hosted security features: Hosted plans lack SSO/SAML, IP whitelisting, or advanced security controls without custom configuration
Encryption: SSL/TLS for data in transit, 256-bit AES encryption for data at rest
SOC 2 Type II certification: Industry-leading security standards with regular third-party audits
Security Certifications
GDPR compliance: Full compliance with European data protection regulations, ensuring data privacy and user rights
Access controls: Role-based access control (RBAC), two-factor authentication (2FA), SSO integration for enterprise security
Data isolation: Customer data stays isolated and private - platform never trains on user data
Domain allowlisting: Ensures chatbot appears only on approved sites for security and brand protection
Secure deployments: ChatGPT Plugin support for private use cases with controlled access
Pricing & Plans
Free Plan - $0/month: 400 credits, 1M character knowledge base, 100+ integrations, basic automations, 1-day log retention for evaluation
Pro Plan - $49.99/month: 5,000 credits, 20M character knowledge base, phone calls, full integrations, Lindy branding on embed, 7-day logs
Business Plan - $199.99-$299.99/month: 20,000-30,000 credits, 50M character knowledge base, custom branding, 30+ languages, unlimited calls, 30-day logs
Enterprise Plan - Custom Pricing: Unlimited credits/users, custom knowledge base limits, SSO, SCIM provisioning, dedicated support, custom SLAs, custom training
Additional Team Members: $19.99/member/month on Pro/Business plans for expanding user access and collaboration
Phone Calls: $0.19/minute using GPT-4o for voice interactions - additional cost on top of plan credits
Custom Automation Building: $500 one-time fee for professional automation development by Lindy team
Credit Add-Ons: $19-$1,199/month for 10,000-1,000,000 credits for high-volume usage beyond plan limits
Credit Consumption Variability: Varies by model choice (Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Haiku 3.5), workflow complexity, premium actions - unpredictable costs
Billing Cycle: Monthly subscription with automatic renewal, credit rollover not documented (likely use-it-or-lose-it monthly)
Payment Methods: Credit card, Enterprise invoicing with wire transfer options for annual contracts
Comparison: vs Zapier ($19.99-$69/month), Make ($9-$29/month), n8n (self-hosted free) - Lindy premium pricing justified by AI capabilities
PRIMARY USER COMPLAINT - Unpredictable Costs: Credit depletion speed consistently frustrating in reviews - 'credits consumed quickly and unpredictably'
CRITICAL LIMITATION - Pricing Transparency: Credit system creates forecasting difficulty vs fixed per-seat or usage-based pricing - budget planning challenging
LIMITATION - Character Limits: 50M character cap on Business tier may limit large enterprise deployments vs unlimited competitors
Open-source (Free): MIT-licensed for self-hosting - pay only your infrastructure costs (Supabase, server, storage) with unlimited API calls and no vendor fees
Hosted Free tier: 100 API calls per month for development and testing
[Pricing]
Basic Plan: $190/year ($15.83/month equivalent) - 750 API calls per month, hosted infrastructure, automatic backups, email support
Enterprise Plan: $1,490/year ($124.17/month equivalent) - 5,000 API calls per month, priority support, SLA guarantees, dedicated resources
No per-document charges: Storage not metered separately - only query volume counts toward plan limits
No user seat fees: Pricing based purely on API call volume, not team size or number of developers
Need more calls? Negotiate custom limits with hosted provider or self-host to eliminate caps entirely
Value proposition: 40-90% cheaper than commercial RAG platforms - Basic plan costs less than 1 month of competing platforms while providing annual service
Standard Plan: $99/month or $89/month annual - 10 custom chatbots, 5,000 items per chatbot, 60 million words per bot, basic helpdesk support, standard security
View Pricing
Premium Plan: $499/month or $449/month annual - 100 custom chatbots, 20,000 items per chatbot, 300 million words per bot, advanced support, enhanced security, additional customization
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing - Comprehensive AI solutions, highest security and compliance, dedicated account managers, custom SSO, token authentication, priority support with faster SLAs
Enterprise Solutions
7-Day Free Trial: Full access to Standard features without charges - available to all users
Annual billing discount: Save 10% by paying upfront annually ($89/mo Standard, $449/mo Premium)
Flat monthly rates: No per-query charges, no hidden costs for API access or white-labeling (included in all plans)
Managed infrastructure: Auto-scaling cloud infrastructure included - no additional hosting or scaling fees
Support & Documentation
Email Support: support@lindy.ai (general), security@lindy.ai (security issues), privacy@lindy.ai (privacy concerns) with tier-based response times
Slack Community: Peer support network for knowledge sharing among Lindy users and automation best practices
Community Forum: community.lindy.ai for discussions, troubleshooting, feature requests with active user participation
Documentation: Lindy Academy with step-by-step tutorials for business users, video walkthroughs, use case examples
Onboarding: Self-service for Free/Pro, guided onboarding for Business, white-glove implementation for Enterprise with custom training
User-Focused Resources: Strong for business user adoption with non-technical language, visual guides, practical examples
CRITICAL GAP - No Developer Documentation: No API reference, code samples, technical architecture documentation, OpenAPI specs
CRITICAL GAP - No Phone Support: Email and community only for Free/Pro/Business tiers - phone access restricted to Enterprise only
LIMITATION - Support Quality Inconsistency: User reviews note 'inconsistent responsiveness on lower tiers' - common Trustpilot criticism
LIMITATION - Slow Response Times: Some users report 'writing to support twice with no response' - support quality concerns for non-enterprise customers
Documentation: Lean API reference docs focusing on endpoint usage with JavaScript code snippets - mostly technical rather than tutorial-heavy
[Docs]
Community support: GitHub Discussions and Discord for free tier and self-hosted users - community-driven help and troubleshooting
Email support: Paid plan users (Basic/Enterprise) get email support with priority levels based on tier
No dedicated CSM: No Customer Success Manager or account management even on Enterprise tier - support ticket-based
GitHub repository: Open-source code welcomes PRs, issues, and community contributions - active maintainer responses
Postman collection: API documentation includes Postman collection for quick testing and integration
Code samples: Community-contributed examples and integrations appearing in GitHub issues and Discord, but not extensive official library
Learning curve: Requires developer skills - no video tutorials, webinars, or certification programs like commercial platforms
Documentation hub: Rich docs, tutorials, cookbooks, FAQs, API references for rapid onboarding
Developer Docs
Email and in-app support: Quick support via email and in-app chat for all users
Premium support: Premium and Enterprise plans include dedicated account managers and faster SLAs
Code samples: Cookbooks, step-by-step guides, and examples for every skill level
API Documentation
Active community: User community plus 5,000+ app integrations through Zapier ecosystem
Regular updates: Platform stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements automatically
Limitations & Considerations
NO Public REST API: Cannot manage agents, create workflows, or query knowledge base programmatically - blocks developer integration
NO Official SDKs: No Python, JavaScript, Ruby, Go, or any language SDK for programmatic access - workflow automation only
NO CLI Tools: No command-line interface for automation or scripting - dashboard-only management
NO Developer Console: No API sandbox, testing environment, or technical documentation for developers
Black Box RAG Implementation: Vector database, embedding models, similarity thresholds completely undisclosed - no transparency
No RAG Benchmarks: No published accuracy metrics, retrieval precision/recall, or latency measurements for evaluation
Search Fuzziness Constraint: Lower fuzziness values limit searches to first 1,500 files - meaningful limitation for large deployments
Character Storage Limits: 50M character maximum on Business tier - may constrain large enterprise knowledge bases vs unlimited competitors
Unpredictable Credit Consumption: Most common user complaint - 'credits depleted quickly and unpredictably' makes budgeting difficult
US-Only Data Residency: No documented EU data residency option - blocks customers with strict data localization requirements (GDPR, Digital Sovereignty)
No ISO 27001 Certification: Only SOC 2 Type II documented - ISO 27001 absence may limit enterprise procurement in regulated industries
1-Day Free Tier Log Retention: Severely limits troubleshooting and security incident investigation vs 30+ day industry standard
Learning Curve for Complex Workflows: Despite 'vibe coding' simplicity, sophisticated multi-agent systems and delegation rules require workflow design expertise
Support Quality Inconsistency: Mixed reviews noting slow/unresponsive support for non-enterprise tiers - support quality varies significantly by plan
No Manual Model Performance Comparison: Cannot A/B test different LLMs or compare model performance - manual experimentation required
Credit-Based Pricing Opacity: Difficult to forecast costs vs fixed per-seat or per-query pricing - budget planning challenging
NOT Ideal For: Developers needing RAG APIs, teams requiring transparent RAG implementation, EU data residency requirements, organizations needing predictable pricing, technical teams wanting embedding/retrieval control
Platform Category Mismatch: Fundamentally a workflow automation platform (competes with Zapier/Make) NOT a RAG-as-a-Service platform - architectural comparison to CustomGPT.ai is misleading
No GUI/dashboard: Everything via API or CLI - no business-user interface for content management, analytics, or configuration
Developer-only tool: Requires coding skills for setup, integration, and maintenance - non-technical teams cannot use without developer support
Basic RAG only: Standard retrieval-augmented generation without advanced features like hybrid search, query reranking, multi-query fusion, or query expansion
No observability built-in: No metrics dashboard, conversation analytics, or performance monitoring - must wire up your own logging layer
Manual hallucination handling: No built-in citation validation, confidence scoring, or factual consistency checks - developers must implement safeguards
Limited connectors: No one-click Google Drive, Notion, or cloud storage integrations - must script data fetching and API uploads manually
No conversation management: Stateless API calls without chat history, multi-turn context, or session management - build conversation layer yourself
Infrastructure knowledge required: Self-hosting requires Supabase, Postgres, and vector database expertise - not plug-and-play for non-DevOps teams
Minimal abstraction: Intentionally low-level API design provides control but requires more integration work than higher-level RAG platforms
Managed service approach: Less control over underlying RAG pipeline configuration compared to build-your-own solutions like LangChain
Vendor lock-in: Proprietary platform - migration to alternative RAG solutions requires rebuilding knowledge bases
Model selection: Limited to OpenAI (GPT-5.1 and 4 series) and Anthropic (Claude, opus and sonnet 4.5) - no support for other LLM providers (Cohere, AI21, open-source models)
Pricing at scale: Flat-rate pricing may become expensive for very high-volume use cases (millions of queries/month) compared to pay-per-use models
Customization limits: While highly configurable, some advanced RAG techniques (custom reranking, hybrid search strategies) may not be exposed
Language support: Supports 90+ languages but performance may vary for less common languages or specialized domains
Real-time data: Knowledge bases require re-indexing for updates - not ideal for real-time data requirements (stock prices, live inventory)
Enterprise features: Some advanced features (custom SSO, token authentication) only available on Enterprise plan with custom pricing
After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both Lindy.ai and Supavec are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.
When to Choose Lindy.ai
You value exceptional no-code usability: 4.9/5 g2 rating, 30-second setup vs 15-60 min with zapier/make
Massive integration ecosystem: 5,000+ apps via Pipedream Connect with 2,500+ pre-built actions
Claude Sonnet 4.5 default drives 10x customer growth - best-in-class language understanding
Best For: Exceptional no-code usability: 4.9/5 G2 rating, 30-second setup vs 15-60 min with Zapier/Make
When to Choose Supavec
You value 100% open source with no vendor lock-in
Complete control over data and infrastructure
Strong privacy with Supabase RLS integration
Best For: 100% open source with no vendor lock-in
Migration & Switching Considerations
Switching between Lindy.ai and Supavec requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.
Pricing Comparison Summary
Lindy.ai starts at custom pricing, while Supavec begins at custom pricing. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.
Our Recommendation Process
Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality
For most organizations, the decision between Lindy.ai and Supavec comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.
📚 Next Steps
Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.
• Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
• Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
• Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
• Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements
Last updated: December 11, 2025 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.
The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.
DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.
People Also Compare
Explore more AI tool comparisons to find the perfect solution for your needs
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...