In this comprehensive guide, we compare Fastbots and Pyx across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.
Overview
When choosing between Fastbots and Pyx, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose Fastbots if: you value best value for multi-llm access - $19.99/month for gpt-4, claude, and gemini (vs competitors at $50-100/month)
Choose Pyx if: you value very quick setup (30-60 minutes)
About Fastbots
Fastbots is ai chatbot platform with 80+ integrations and white-label agency features. Fastbots is a multi-LLM chatbot platform with 80+ native integrations, visual flow builder, and comprehensive white-labeling for agencies. It offers intelligent routing across GPT-4, Claude, and Gemini with competitive pricing starting at $19.99/month, but lacks enterprise certifications and has inconsistent performance across different LLMs. Founded in 2023, headquartered in United States, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
96/100
Starting Price
$19.99/mo
About Pyx
Pyx is find. don't search.. Pyx AI is an enterprise conversational search tool that leverages Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to deliver real-time answers from company data. It continuously synchronizes with data sources and enables natural language queries across unstructured documents without keywords or pre-sorting. Founded in 2022, headquartered in Europe, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
83/100
Starting Price
$30/mo
Key Differences at a Glance
In terms of user ratings, Fastbots in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, pricing is comparable. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: Chatbot Platform versus AI Search. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.
⚠️ What This Comparison Covers
We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.
Detailed Feature Comparison
Fastbots
Pyx
CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
Website crawling: Enter URL and auto-extract content with configurable depth
Document upload: PDF, DOCX, TXT, CSV files
Audio and video ingestion: Upload media files for transcription and knowledge extraction
Plain text input: Paste or type content directly
Storage limits: 400K characters (Free), 11 million characters (Starter+)
Auto-retrain: Configurable schedule for knowledge base updates (daily, weekly, monthly)
Note: No native Google Drive, Dropbox, or Notion integrations - requires manual export or API setup
Note: No YouTube transcript auto-ingestion - video must be uploaded as file
Note: 11M character limit can fill quickly with comprehensive documentation (e.g., enterprise KB with 100+ articles)
Sitemap support: Bulk import from XML sitemaps
Focuses on unstructured data—you simply point it at your files and it indexes them right away.
Appvizer mention
Keeps connected file repositories in sync automatically, so any document changes show up almost instantly.
Works with common formats (PDF, DOCX, PPT, text, and more) and turns them into a chat-ready knowledge store.
Doesn’t try to crawl whole websites or YouTube—the ingestion scope is intentionally narrower than CustomGPT’s.
Built for enterprise-scale volumes (exact limits not published) and aims for near-real-time indexing of large corporate data sets.
Lets you ingest more than 1,400 file formats—PDF, DOCX, TXT, Markdown, HTML, and many more—via simple drag-and-drop or API.
Crawls entire sites through sitemaps and URLs, automatically indexing public help-desk articles, FAQs, and docs.
Turns multimedia into text on the fly: YouTube videos, podcasts, and other media are auto-transcribed with built-in OCR and speech-to-text.
View Transcription Guide
Connects to Google Drive, SharePoint, Notion, Confluence, HubSpot, and more through API connectors or Zapier.
See Zapier Connectors
Supports both manual uploads and auto-sync retraining, so your knowledge base always stays up to date.
L L M Model Options
OpenAI models: GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-3.5 Turbo
Anthropic Claude 3: Opus (most capable), Sonnet (balanced), Haiku (fast)
Google Gemini Pro 1.5
Meta Llama 3.1
Model selection: User chooses specific LLM per chatbot
Intelligent routing: Assign different models to different conversation scenarios (e.g., GPT-4 for complex, GPT-3.5 for simple)
Cost optimization: Route simple queries to cheaper models, complex to GPT-4
Note: Performance varies by model: Users report GPT-4 works best, Claude/Gemini show inconsistencies
No API key requirement: Models included in subscription (vs bring-your-own-key platforms)
Doesn’t expose model choice—Pyx likely runs GPT-3.5 or GPT-4 under the hood, but you can’t switch or fine-tune it.
No toggles for speed vs. accuracy; every query uses the same model configuration.
Focuses on its RAG engine with a single, undisclosed LLM—less flexible than tools that let you pick GPT-3.5 or GPT-4 explicitly.
No advanced re-ranking or multi-model routing options are mentioned.
Taps into top models—OpenAI’s GPT-5.1 series, GPT-4 series, and even Anthropic’s Claude for enterprise needs (4.5 opus and sonnet, etc ).
Automatically balances cost and performance by picking the right model for each request.
Model Selection Details
Uses proprietary prompt engineering and retrieval tweaks to return high-quality, citation-backed answers.
Handles all model management behind the scenes—no extra API keys or fine-tuning steps for you.
Performance & Accuracy
GPT-4 performance: Highest accuracy and consistency reported by users
Claude 3 performance: Mixed results - some users report hallucinations and off-topic responses
Gemini Pro performance: Inconsistent accuracy noted in user reviews
Overall accuracy: ~85% with optimal model selection (GPT-4)
Response time: Real-time streaming for faster perceived performance
Uptime: ~99.5% estimated from user feedback
Note: No published SLA commitments
Conversation memory: Context retention across messages within session
Aims to serve accurate, real-time answers from internal documents—though public benchmark data is sparse.
Likely competitive with standard GPT-based RAG systems on relevance and hallucination control.
No detailed info on anti-hallucination tactics or turbo re-ranking like CustomGPT touts.
Auto-sync keeps documents fresh, so retrieval context is always current.
Delivers sub-second replies with an optimized pipeline—efficient vector search, smart chunking, and caching.
Independent tests rate median answer accuracy at 5/5—outpacing many alternatives.
Benchmark Results
Always cites sources so users can verify facts on the spot.
Maintains speed and accuracy even for massive knowledge bases with tens of millions of words.
White-label from Starter plan vs enterprise-only at competitors ($199+)
Market position: Turnkey internal knowledge search tool (Germany-based) designed as standalone application for employee Q&A, not embeddable chatbot platform
Target customers: Small to mid-size European teams needing simple internal knowledge search, organizations prioritizing GDPR compliance and German data residency, and companies wanting no-fuss deployment without developer involvement
Key competitors: Glean, Guru, notion AI, and traditional enterprise search tools; less comparable to customer-facing chatbots like CustomGPT/Botsonic
Competitive advantages: Intentionally simple scope with minimal configuration overhead, auto-sync keeping knowledge base current without manual uploads, Germany-based with implicit GDPR compliance and EU data residency, seat-based pricing (~$30/user/month) clear and predictable, and strong access controls with role-based permissions for secure internal deployment
Pricing advantage: ~$30 per user per month seat-based pricing; cost-effective for small teams but can scale expensively for large organizations; simpler pricing than usage-based platforms but less economical for high user counts; best value for teams <50 users needing internal search only
Use case fit: Perfect for small European teams wanting simple internal knowledge Q&A without coding, organizations needing GDPR-compliant employee knowledge base with German data residency, and companies prioritizing quick setup over flexibility; not suitable for public-facing chatbots, API integrations, or heavy customization requirements
Market position: Leading all-in-one RAG platform balancing enterprise-grade accuracy with developer-friendly APIs and no-code usability for rapid deployment
Target customers: Mid-market to enterprise organizations needing production-ready AI assistants, development teams wanting robust APIs without building RAG infrastructure, and businesses requiring 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription (YouTube, podcasts)
Key competitors: OpenAI Assistants API, Botsonic, Chatbase.co, Azure AI, and custom RAG implementations using LangChain
Competitive advantages: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling included, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, hosted MCP Server support (Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT), generous data limits (60M words Standard, 300M Premium), and flat monthly pricing without per-query charges
Pricing advantage: Transparent flat-rate pricing at $99/month (Standard) and $449/month (Premium) with generous included limits; no hidden costs for API access, branding removal, or basic features; best value for teams needing both no-code dashboard and developer APIs in one platform
Use case fit: Ideal for businesses needing both rapid no-code deployment and robust API capabilities, organizations handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), teams requiring white-label chatbots with source citations for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects, and companies wanting all-in-one RAG without managing ML infrastructure
A I Models
OpenAI models: GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-3.5 Turbo with user selection per chatbot
Anthropic Claude 3: Opus (most capable), Sonnet (balanced), Haiku (fast)
Google Gemini Pro 1.5 for multimodal capabilities
Meta Llama 3.1 open-source alternative
Intelligent routing: Assign different models to different conversation scenarios (e.g., GPT-4 for complex, GPT-3.5 for simple)
Cost optimization: Route simple queries to cheaper models (GPT-3.5), complex to premium (GPT-4)
No API key requirement: Models included in subscription vs bring-your-own-key platforms
Performance variance: User reports indicate GPT-4 works best, Claude/Gemini show inconsistencies
Undisclosed LLM: Likely runs GPT-3.5 or GPT-4 under the hood but exact model not publicly documented
NO Model Selection: Cannot switch or choose between different LLMs - single model configuration for all queries
NO Model Toggles: No speed vs accuracy options - every query uses same model configuration
Opaque Architecture: Model details, context window size, and capabilities not exposed to users
Focus on Simplicity: Intentionally hides technical complexity - users ask questions, get answers
NO Fine-Tuning: Cannot customize or train model on specific domain data for specialized responses
Single RAG Engine: Less flexible than tools offering explicit GPT-3.5/GPT-4 choice or multi-model support
Primary models: GPT-5.1 and 4 series from OpenAI, and Anthropic's Claude 4.5 (opus and sonnet) for enterprise needs
Automatic model selection: Balances cost and performance by automatically selecting the appropriate model for each request
Model Selection Details
Proprietary optimizations: Custom prompt engineering and retrieval enhancements for high-quality, citation-backed answers
Managed infrastructure: All model management handled behind the scenes - no API keys or fine-tuning required from users
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms ensure chatbot only answers based on provided content, improving trust and factual accuracy
R A G Capabilities
Website crawling: Auto-extract content with configurable depth from URL entry
Document upload: PDF, DOCX, TXT, CSV files with 11 million character storage limit (Starter+)
Audio and video ingestion: Upload media files for transcription and knowledge extraction
Auto-retrain scheduling: Configurable updates (daily, weekly, monthly) for knowledge base freshness
Sitemap support: Bulk import from XML sitemaps for comprehensive site coverage
Conversation memory: Context retention across messages within session
Overall accuracy: ~85% with optimal model selection (GPT-4 performs best)
Response time: Real-time streaming for faster perceived performance
Limitations: No native Google Drive, Dropbox, or Notion integrations; 11M character limit fills quickly with comprehensive documentation
Basic RAG Implementation: Conversational search over enterprise documents with context-aware follow-up questions
Document Formats: Supports PDF, DOCX, PPT, TXT and more common enterprise formats
NO Advanced Controls: No chunking parameters, embedding model selection, or similarity threshold configuration exposed
NO Anti-Hallucination Metrics: No detailed transparency on citation attribution or confidence scoring mechanisms
NO Re-Ranking: No advanced re-ranking or turbo retrieval options mentioned
Closed System: RAG engine optimized for internal Q&A - limited visibility into underlying retrieval architecture
Competitive Performance: Likely competitive with standard GPT-based RAG for relevance but lacks published benchmarks
Core architecture: GPT-4 combined with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology, outperforming OpenAI in RAG benchmarks
RAG Performance
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms reduce hallucinations and ensure responses are grounded in provided content
Benchmark Details
Automatic citations: Each response includes clickable citations pointing to original source documents for transparency and verification
Optimized pipeline: Efficient vector search, smart chunking, and caching for sub-second reply times
Scalability: Maintains speed and accuracy for massive knowledge bases with tens of millions of words
Context-aware conversations: Multi-turn conversations with persistent history and comprehensive conversation management
Source verification: Always cites sources so users can verify facts on the spot
Use Cases
E-commerce customer support: Shopify, WooCommerce, BigCommerce integrations for 24/7 product queries and order tracking
Lead generation: Custom forms with field validation, lead qualification scoring, and CRM sync (HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive)
Multi-channel deployment: WhatsApp (Cloud API + 360Dialog), Facebook Messenger, Instagram DM, Telegram, Slack, Discord with unified inbox
Small business websites: JavaScript widget embedding with customization for professional appearance at $19.99/month
Agency white-label: Custom domains, remove branding from Starter plan for client deployments
Multilingual support: 95+ languages with automatic translation for global customer bases
NOT suitable for: Regulated industries (no HIPAA, SOC 2), voice/IVR use cases, enterprises requiring compliance certifications
Internal Knowledge Search: Primary use case - employees asking questions about company documents and policies
Document Q&A: Quick answers from internal documentation without manual searching through files
Team Onboarding: New employees finding information in knowledge base without bothering colleagues
Policy & Procedure Lookup: HR, compliance, and operational procedure retrieval for staff
Small European Teams: GDPR-compliant internal search for EU organizations prioritizing data residency
No-Code Deployment: Non-technical teams wanting simple setup without developer involvement
NOT SUITABLE FOR: Public-facing chatbots, customer support, API integrations, multi-channel deployment, or heavy customization requirements
Customer support automation: AI assistants handling common queries, reducing support ticket volume, providing 24/7 instant responses with source citations
Internal knowledge management: Employee self-service for HR policies, technical documentation, onboarding materials, company procedures across 1,400+ file formats
Sales enablement: Product information chatbots, lead qualification, customer education with white-labeled widgets on websites and apps
Documentation assistance: Technical docs, help centers, FAQs with automatic website crawling and sitemap indexing
Educational platforms: Course materials, research assistance, student support with multimedia content (YouTube transcriptions, podcasts)
Healthcare information: Patient education, medical knowledge bases (SOC 2 Type II compliant for sensitive data)
Professional ($99/mo): 5 chatbots, 10K messages/month, priority support, API access, advanced analytics
Business ($399/mo): 20 chatbots, 40K messages/month, white-label, dedicated account manager
5-day trial: Test paid features before committing to subscription
Best value proposition: $19.99 for GPT-4, Claude, Gemini access vs competitors at $50-100/month
No hidden costs: LLM usage included in subscription (no per-token charges like some platforms)
Annual discount: Save 20% with yearly billing commitment
Seat-Based Pricing: ~$30 per user per month
Cost-Effective for Small Teams: Affordable for teams under 50 users with predictable monthly costs
Scalability Challenge: Can become expensive for large organizations (100 users = $3,000/month)
NO Published Document Limits: Content may be "unlimited" - gated only by user seats rather than storage caps
Free Trial Available: Hands-on evaluation before committing to paid plan
Enterprise Deals: Custom pricing available for larger deployments with volume discounts
Simple Scaling: Add more seats as team grows - no complex usage-based billing
Best Value For: Small European teams (<50 users) needing predictable costs vs token/usage-based platforms
Standard Plan: $99/month or $89/month annual - 10 custom chatbots, 5,000 items per chatbot, 60 million words per bot, basic helpdesk support, standard security
View Pricing
Premium Plan: $499/month or $449/month annual - 100 custom chatbots, 20,000 items per chatbot, 300 million words per bot, advanced support, enhanced security, additional customization
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing - Comprehensive AI solutions, highest security and compliance, dedicated account managers, custom SSO, token authentication, priority support with faster SLAs
Enterprise Solutions
7-Day Free Trial: Full access to Standard features without charges - available to all users
Annual billing discount: Save 10% by paying upfront annually ($89/mo Standard, $449/mo Premium)
Flat monthly rates: No per-query charges, no hidden costs for API access or white-labeling (included in all plans)
Managed infrastructure: Auto-scaling cloud infrastructure included - no additional hosting or scaling fees
Support & Documentation
4.9/5 customer support rating on G2 (exceptional for pricing tier)
Email support: Available on all plans including free tier
Priority support: Professional and Business plans with faster response times
Dedicated account manager: Business plan ($399/month) includes personal contact
Knowledge base: Comprehensive help center with guides and tutorials
Video tutorials: Step-by-step implementation guides for common scenarios
Community: User community for best practices sharing and tips
Live chat support: Available during business hours for quick questions
Response time: Fast responses noted by users (typically within hours, not days)
Limitations: No 24/7 support on lower tiers, no SLA guarantees on response times
Direct Support: Email, phone, and chat support with hands-on onboarding approach
User-Friendly Setup: Minimal admin overhead - connect data sources and employees start asking questions
NO Open-Source Community: Closed solution without external plug-ins or user-built extensions
NO Public API: No developer documentation or programmatic access for custom integrations
Product Roadmap: Updates come from Pyx's own roadmap - no user-contributed features or marketplace
Quick Deployment: Emphasizes fast setup and minimal configuration vs complex enterprise platforms
Limited Technical Depth: Support focused on basic usage - not extensive developer or API documentation
Best For: Non-technical teams wanting simple, reliable support without complex integration needs
Documentation hub: Rich docs, tutorials, cookbooks, FAQs, API references for rapid onboarding
Developer Docs
Email and in-app support: Quick support via email and in-app chat for all users
Premium support: Premium and Enterprise plans include dedicated account managers and faster SLAs
Code samples: Cookbooks, step-by-step guides, and examples for every skill level
API Documentation
Active community: User community plus 5,000+ app integrations through Zapier ecosystem
Regular updates: Platform stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements automatically
Limitations & Considerations
No compliance certifications: Missing SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, FedRAMP - unsuitable for regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government)
No native cloud storage: No Google Drive, Dropbox, or Notion integrations - requires manual export or API setup
Storage limits: 11M character limit can fill quickly with comprehensive enterprise documentation (e.g., 100+ article knowledge bases)
Model performance variance: Users report GPT-4 works best, Claude/Gemini show inconsistencies and hallucinations
No voice/IVR capabilities: No phone integration or voice bot features unlike UChat or Zendesk
No SMS support: Text messaging requires third-party integration
Developer experience: No official SDKs in any language (Python, JavaScript, etc.), basic REST API documentation only
Analytics limitations: Less advanced than enterprise platforms (no predictive insights or AI-powered recommendations)
Best for: SMBs prioritizing value and multi-LLM access over enterprise certifications and advanced features
NO Public API: Cannot embed Pyx into other apps or call it programmatically - standalone UI only
NO Embedding Options: Not designed for website widgets, Slack bots, or public-facing deployment
NO Messaging Integrations: No Slack, Teams, WhatsApp, or other chat platform connectors
Limited Branding: Minimal customization (logo/colors) - designed as internal tool, not white-label solution
Siloed Platform: Standalone interface rather than extensible platform - no plug-ins or marketplace
NO Advanced Controls: Cannot configure RAG parameters, model selection, or retrieval strategies
NO Analytics Dashboard: Lighter on insights than solutions with full conversation analytics suites
Seat-Based Cost Scaling: Becomes expensive for large organizations vs usage-based or project-based pricing
Limited to Internal Use: Not suitable for customer-facing chatbots, developer-heavy customization, or API integrations
Best For: Small European teams (<50 users) prioritizing simplicity and GDPR compliance over flexibility and features
Managed service approach: Less control over underlying RAG pipeline configuration compared to build-your-own solutions like LangChain
Vendor lock-in: Proprietary platform - migration to alternative RAG solutions requires rebuilding knowledge bases
Model selection: Limited to OpenAI (GPT-5.1 and 4 series) and Anthropic (Claude, opus and sonnet 4.5) - no support for other LLM providers (Cohere, AI21, open-source models)
Pricing at scale: Flat-rate pricing may become expensive for very high-volume use cases (millions of queries/month) compared to pay-per-use models
Customization limits: While highly configurable, some advanced RAG techniques (custom reranking, hybrid search strategies) may not be exposed
Language support: Supports 90+ languages but performance may vary for less common languages or specialized domains
Real-time data: Knowledge bases require re-indexing for updates - not ideal for real-time data requirements (stock prices, live inventory)
Enterprise features: Some advanced features (custom SSO, token authentication) only available on Enterprise plan with custom pricing
Core Agent Features
AI agent transformation: Transform chatbots into powerful AI agents that seamlessly perform tasks through natural conversational interactions
Zapier AI Actions integration: Deploy AI agents that automate tasks, streamline workflows, and perform real-world business actions with ease
Mid-conversation app calling: Bots can call thousands of apps mid-chat to check orders, book appointments, send emails without leaving conversation
Natural language understanding: AI models designed to understand and respond naturally making conversations feel human-like and helpful
95 languages support: Assist users in their preferred language automatically for global customer engagement
Advanced model options: OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic's Claude 3.5 for nuanced conversational abilities
Effortless lead collection: Gather contact details during conversations with automatic multi-email address sending
Seamless CRM connectivity: Connect to over 7,000 apps using Zapier or Make integrations to collect leads and send to CRM platforms
No-code conversational AI: Create sophisticated conversational AI agents without writing a single line of code
Business knowledge integration: Knows everything about your business and chats directly to customers in friendly conversational manner
NO Agent Capabilities: Pyx AI does not offer autonomous agents, tool calling, or multi-agent orchestration features
Conversational Search Only: Provides context-aware dialogue for internal knowledge Q&A - not agentic behavior or autonomous decision-making
Basic RAG Architecture: Standard retrieval-augmented generation without agent-specific enhancements (no function calling, no tool use, no workflows)
Follow-Up Questions: Maintains conversation context for multi-turn dialogue but no autonomous reasoning or task execution capabilities
Closed System: Standalone application without extensibility for agent frameworks (LangChain, CrewAI) or external tool integration
Auto-Sync Automation: Connected file repositories auto-sync (automation feature) but not agent-driven - simple scheduled indexing
No External Actions: Cannot invoke APIs, execute code, query databases, or interact with external systems - pure knowledge retrieval
Internal Knowledge Focus: Designed for employee Q&A about company documents - not task automation or agentic workflows
Platform Philosophy: Intentionally simple scope with minimal configuration - avoids complexity of agentic systems
Use Case Limitation: Suitable for knowledge search only - not for autonomous agents, workflow automation, or complex reasoning tasks
Custom AI Agents: Build autonomous agents powered by GPT-4 and Claude that can perform tasks independently and make real-time decisions based on business knowledge
Decision-Support Capabilities: AI agents analyze proprietary data to provide insights, recommendations, and actionable responses specific to your business domain
Multi-Agent Systems: Deploy multiple specialized AI agents that can collaborate and optimize workflows in areas like customer support, sales, and internal knowledge management
Memory & Context Management: Agents maintain conversation history and persistent context for coherent multi-turn interactions
View Agent Documentation
Tool Integration: Agents can trigger actions, integrate with external APIs via webhooks, and connect to 5,000+ apps through Zapier for automated workflows
Hyper-Accurate Responses: Leverages advanced RAG technology and retrieval mechanisms to deliver context-aware, citation-backed responses grounded in your knowledge base
Continuous Learning: Agents improve over time through automatic re-indexing of knowledge sources and integration of new data without manual retraining
R A G-as-a- Service Assessment
Platform type: CONVERSATIONAL AI PLATFORM WITH RAG (not pure RAG-as-a-Service) - chatbot builder with integrated knowledge retrieval
Data source flexibility: Good - Website crawling with configurable depth, document upload (PDF, DOCX, TXT, CSV), audio/video ingestion, plain text input, sitemap support
LLM model options: Excellent - OpenAI (GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-3.5 Turbo), Anthropic Claude 3 (Opus, Sonnet, Haiku), Google Gemini Pro 1.5, Meta Llama 3.1 with user selection per chatbot
Knowledge base management: 11M character storage limit (Starter+), auto-retrain scheduling (daily, weekly, monthly), conversation memory for context retention
API-first architecture: Weak - REST API available on Professional ($99/mo) and above, no official SDKs, basic documentation, no Swagger/OpenAPI spec
Performance benchmarks: ~85% accuracy with optimal model selection (GPT-4), real-time streaming responses, ~99.5% uptime estimated from user feedback (no published SLA)
RAG accuracy: GPT-4 highest accuracy/consistency, Claude 3/Gemini Pro show mixed results with inconsistencies noted in user reviews
Self-service AI pricing: Excellent - $19.99/month for GPT-4, Claude, Gemini access (best value in market vs competitors at $50-100/month)
Compliance & certifications: Poor - GDPR/CCPA compliant, data encryption, SSL/TLS but NO SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, FedRAMP
Integration ecosystem: Excellent - 80+ native integrations (no Zapier/Make required) including WhatsApp, Messenger, Instagram, Shopify, Stripe, HubSpot, Salesforce
Best for: SMBs, agencies, e-commerce stores prioritizing value, multi-LLM access, and native integrations over enterprise RAG features and certifications
Not suitable for: Regulated industries (healthcare, finance), enterprises requiring certifications, advanced RAG parameter controls, voice/IVR use cases
Platform Type: NOT TRUE RAG-AS-A-SERVICE - Pyx AI is a standalone internal knowledge search application, not API-accessible RAG platform
Core Focus: Turnkey internal Q&A tool for employees - self-contained application vs developer-accessible RAG infrastructure
NO API Access: No REST API, SDKs, or programmatic access - fundamentally different from API-first RaaS platforms (CustomGPT, Vectara, Nuclia)
Closed Application: Users access via web/desktop interface only - cannot build custom applications on top or integrate with other systems
No Developer Features: No embedding endpoints, chunking configuration, retrieval customization, or model selection - opaque RAG implementation
Comparison Category Mismatch: Invalid comparison to RAG-as-a-Service platforms - more comparable to internal search tools (Glean, Guru, Notion AI)
SaaS vs RaaS: Software-as-a-Service (standalone app) NOT Retrieval-as-a-Service (API infrastructure for developers)
Best Comparison Category: Internal knowledge management tools (Glean, Guru), NOT developer RAG platforms (CustomGPT, Pinecone Assistant)
Use Case Fit: Small teams (<50 users) wanting simple employee knowledge search - not organizations building custom AI applications
No Extensibility: Cannot embed in websites, build chatbots, integrate with business systems - siloed internal tool only
GDPR Appeal: Germany-based with implicit compliance - suitable for European SMBs prioritizing data residency over platform capabilities
Platform Recommendation: Should be compared to internal search tools (Glean, Guru), not listed alongside RAG-as-a-Service platforms
Core Architecture: Serverless RAG infrastructure with automatic embedding generation, vector search optimization, and LLM orchestration fully managed behind API endpoints
API-First Design: Comprehensive REST API with well-documented endpoints for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data (1,400+ formats), and querying chat
API Documentation
Developer Experience: Open-source Python SDK (customgpt-client), Postman collections, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, and extensive cookbooks for rapid integration
No-Code Alternative: Wizard-style web dashboard enables non-developers to upload content, brand widgets, and deploy chatbots without touching code
Hybrid Target Market: Serves both developer teams wanting robust APIs AND business users seeking no-code RAG deployment - unique positioning vs pure API platforms (Cohere) or pure no-code tools (Jotform)
RAG Technology Leadership: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, proprietary anti-hallucination mechanisms, and citation-backed responses
Benchmark Details
Deployment Flexibility: Cloud-hosted SaaS with auto-scaling, API integrations, embedded chat widgets, ChatGPT Plugin support, and hosted MCP Server for Claude/Cursor/ChatGPT
Enterprise Readiness: SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling, domain allowlisting, RBAC with 2FA/SSO, and flat-rate pricing without per-query charges
Use Case Fit: Ideal for organizations needing both rapid no-code deployment AND robust API capabilities, teams handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), and businesses requiring production-ready RAG without building ML infrastructure from scratch
Competitive Positioning: Bridges the gap between developer-first platforms (Cohere, Deepset) requiring heavy coding and no-code chatbot builders (Jotform, Kommunicate) lacking API depth - offers best of both worlds
Additional Considerations
Free plan limitations: Only 50 messages per month suitable for testing rather than real-world production use
Not suitable for complex flows: Limited ability for intricate multi-step "if-this-then-that" logic like classic Messenger marketing bots
Training time investment: Bot training and customization take time to master for optimal performance
Limited Meta integration: Limited ability to integrate with Meta (Facebook) content lessens overall tool value for social media marketing
Company maturity: Founded in 2022, still building long-term enterprise track record vs more established players - consideration for very large corporations
Scalability evaluation: Businesses should evaluate whether pricing model accommodates growth without becoming prohibitively expensive
Custom plans available: Enterprise needs can be accommodated with custom pricing and fully managed services
Managed services offering: For large teams with advanced needs, FastBots offers fully managed services handling strategy, setup, training, and ongoing improvements
Strategic advantage: Unmatched flexibility with choice of LLMs and data sources distinguishes from competitors with locked-in models
Great if you want a no-fuss, internal knowledge chat that employees can use without coding.
Not ideal for public-facing chatbots or developer-heavy customization.
Shines as a single, siloed AI search environment rather than a broad, extensible platform.
Simpler in scope than CustomGPT—less flexible, but easier to stand up quickly for internal use cases.
Slashes engineering overhead with an all-in-one RAG platform—no in-house ML team required.
Gets you to value quickly: launch a functional AI assistant in minutes.
Stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements, so you’re always on the latest tech.
Balances top-tier accuracy with ease of use, perfect for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects.
Visual flow builder: Drag-and-drop conversation design with no coding required for creating chatbot workflows
Tone and personality: Configurable via system prompts to match brand voice and communication style
Greeting messages: Customize initial bot message and icebreakers for welcoming user experience
Multi-language support: 95+ languages with automatic translation for global customer bases
Knowledge source control: Decide what chatbot knows - uploaded information (files, docs, brand tone), ChatGPT general knowledge, or live internet search for real-time info
Auto-retrain scheduling: Configurable daily, weekly, or monthly knowledge base updates for content freshness
Conversation flow builder: Visual drag-and-drop interface for designing conversation paths
Custom forms: Lead capture with custom fields and field validation for data collection
Lead qualification: Score and route leads based on responses for sales prioritization
Intelligent routing: Assign different models to different conversation scenarios (GPT-4 for complex, GPT-3.5 for simple) for cost optimization
Military-grade encryption: All uploaded data secured with military-grade encryption for data protection
Auto-sync keeps your knowledge base updated without manual uploads.
No persona or tone controls—the AI voice stays neutral and consistent.
Strong access controls let admins set who can see what, although deeper behavior tweaks aren’t available.
A closed, secure environment—great for content updates, limited for AI behavior tweaks or deployment variety.
Lets you add, remove, or tweak content on the fly—automatic re-indexing keeps everything current.
Shapes agent behavior through system prompts and sample Q&A, ensuring a consistent voice and focus.
Learn How to Update Sources
Supports multiple agents per account, so different teams can have their own bots.
Balances hands-on control with smart defaults—no deep ML expertise required to get tailored behavior.
After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both Fastbots and Pyx are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.
When to Choose Fastbots
You value best value for multi-llm access - $19.99/month for gpt-4, claude, and gemini (vs competitors at $50-100/month)
80+ native integrations eliminate need for Zapier/Make middleware (saves $20-50/month)
Exceptional customer support - 4.9/5 rating with fast response times
Best For: Best value for multi-LLM access - $19.99/month for GPT-4, Claude, and Gemini (vs competitors at $50-100/month)
When to Choose Pyx
You value very quick setup (30-60 minutes)
No manual data imports required
Excellent ease of use with conversational interface
Best For: Very quick setup (30-60 minutes)
Migration & Switching Considerations
Switching between Fastbots and Pyx requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.
Pricing Comparison Summary
Fastbots starts at $19.99/month, while Pyx begins at $30/month. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.
Our Recommendation Process
Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality
For most organizations, the decision between Fastbots and Pyx comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.
📚 Next Steps
Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.
• Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
• Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
• Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
• Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements
Last updated: December 14, 2025 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.
The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.
DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.
People Also Compare
Explore more AI tool comparisons to find the perfect solution for your needs
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...