In this comprehensive guide, we compare Stonly and Vectara across various parameters including features, pricing, performance, and customer support to help you make the best decision for your business needs.
Overview
When choosing between Stonly and Vectara, understanding their unique strengths and architectural differences is crucial for making an informed decision. Both platforms serve the RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) space but cater to different use cases and organizational needs.
Quick Decision Guide
Choose Stonly if: you value exceptional ease of use - 4.8/5 g2 rating with intuitive visual editor praised in 32 reviews
Choose Vectara if: you value industry-leading accuracy with minimal hallucinations
About Stonly
Stonly is interactive knowledge base platform with enterprise ai-powered answers. Stonly is a customer support knowledge management platform with embedded AI capabilities focused on interactive step-by-step guides and help desk agent assistance. Its AI Answers feature (Enterprise-only add-on) achieves 71% self-serve success rates, but it's fundamentally a knowledge base platform with AI features—not a pure RAG-as-a-Service solution. Founded in 2017, headquartered in San Francisco, CA, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
96/100
Starting Price
$249/mo
About Vectara
Vectara is the trusted platform for rag-as-a-service. Vectara is an enterprise-ready RAG platform that provides best-in-class retrieval accuracy with minimal hallucinations. It offers a serverless API solution for embedding powerful generative AI functionality into applications with semantic search, grounded generation, and secure access control. Founded in 2020, headquartered in Palo Alto, CA, the platform has established itself as a reliable solution in the RAG space.
Overall Rating
90/100
Starting Price
Custom
Key Differences at a Glance
In terms of user ratings, Stonly in overall satisfaction. From a cost perspective, Vectara offers more competitive entry pricing. The platforms also differ in their primary focus: Knowledge Management versus RAG Platform. These differences make each platform better suited for specific use cases and organizational requirements.
⚠️ What This Comparison Covers
We'll analyze features, pricing, performance benchmarks, security compliance, integration capabilities, and real-world use cases to help you determine which platform best fits your organization's needs. All data is independently verified from official documentation and third-party review platforms.
Detailed Feature Comparison
Stonly
Vectara
CustomGPTRECOMMENDED
Data Ingestion & Knowledge Sources
PDF uploads confirmed
Public website crawling: Pages not requiring authentication
Zendesk help center content indexing
Proprietary interactive guide format as primary content model
Note: No Google Drive, Dropbox, Notion, or SharePoint integrations for data ingestion
Note: No YouTube transcript extraction (videos can be embedded but not processed)
Note: No direct Word document (.docx) or HTML file imports confirmed
Note: No automatic content syncing from external sources - updates are manual through Stonly's visual editor
Content limits by tier: Basic (5 guides, 400 views/mo), Small Business (unlimited guides, 4K views/mo), Enterprise (custom)
Content versioning: Side-by-side comparison and instant restore on Business and Enterprise plans
Pulls in just about any document type—PDF, DOCX, HTML, and more—for a thorough index of your content (Vectara Platform).
Packed with connectors for cloud storage and enterprise systems, so your data stays synced automatically.
Processes everything behind the scenes and turns it into embeddings for fast semantic search.
Lets you ingest more than 1,400 file formats—PDF, DOCX, TXT, Markdown, HTML, and many more—via simple drag-and-drop or API.
Crawls entire sites through sitemaps and URLs, automatically indexing public help-desk articles, FAQs, and docs.
Turns multimedia into text on the fly: YouTube videos, podcasts, and other media are auto-transcribed with built-in OCR and speech-to-text.
View Transcription Guide
Connects to Google Drive, SharePoint, Notion, Confluence, HubSpot, and more through API connectors or Zapier.
See Zapier Connectors
Supports both manual uploads and auto-sync retraining, so your knowledge base always stays up to date.
L L M Model Options
Note: Undisclosed proprietary LLM - Stonly does not disclose the specific model powering AI Answers
Note: No model selection - users cannot choose between GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Claude, or other models
Note: No temperature controls, fine-tuning, or model routing
AI Profiles: Up to 20 per team for tone and behavior customization
Custom Instructions: Up to 100 per team defining boundaries and style
Guided AI Answers: Define specific questions that trigger predetermined answers, bypassing AI generation for sensitive scenarios
Automatic fallback: When AI confidence is low, system falls back to ML-powered search rather than forcing an answer
Knowledge-grounded approach: AI responses anchored in Stonly guides, external websites, and selected PDFs to reduce hallucinations
Runs its in-house Mockingbird model by default, but can call GPT-4 or GPT-3.5 through Azure OpenAI.
Lets you choose the model that balances cost versus quality for your needs.
Prompt templates are customizable, so you can steer tone, format, and citation rules.
Taps into top models—OpenAI’s GPT-4, GPT-3.5 Turbo, and even Anthropic’s Claude for enterprise needs.
Automatically balances cost and performance by picking the right model for each request.
Model Selection Details
Uses proprietary prompt engineering and retrieval tweaks to return high-quality, citation-backed answers.
Handles all model management behind the scenes—no extra API keys or fine-tuning steps for you.
Performance & Accuracy
71% self-serve success rate with AI Answers feature (company data)
70-76% support ticket reduction documented in case studies
99.9% uptime claimed but no published SLA details or response time data
Note: No published latency metrics or performance benchmarks
Note: No real-time analytics - Flow reports update every 15 minutes
Hallucination controls: Strong grounding in structured content reduces off-topic responses
Widget lazy loading: Minimizes impact on host website performance
Tuned for enterprise scale—expect millisecond responses even with heavy traffic (Microsoft Mechanics).
Hybrid search blends semantic and keyword matching for pinpoint accuracy.
Advanced reranking and a factual-consistency score keep hallucinations in check.
Delivers sub-second replies with an optimized pipeline—efficient vector search, smart chunking, and caching.
Independent tests rate median answer accuracy at 5/5—outpacing many alternatives.
Benchmark Results
Always cites sources so users can verify facts on the spot.
Maintains speed and accuracy even for massive knowledge bases with tens of millions of words.
Developer Experience ( A P I & S D Ks)
REST API: Supports user provisioning, content management, widget control
Mobile SDKs (Enterprise only): iOS, Android, React Native, Flutter
Note: No Python SDK or server-side Node.js SDK
Note: No GraphQL API or OpenAPI/Swagger specification
Note: Rate limits not publicly documented
Note: No API Explorer, sandbox environment, or Postman collections
Note: REST API versioning strategy unclear
Widget API: Programmatic control including opening specific content, listening for events, user identification
CSP whitelisting: Instructions documented for Content Security Policy compliance
Widget versioning documented
Comprehensive REST API plus SDKs for C#, Python, Java, and JavaScript (Vectara FAQs).
Clear docs and sample code walk you through integration and index ops.
Secure API access via Azure AD or your own auth setup.
Ships a well-documented REST API for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data, and querying chat.
API Documentation
Quick onboarding: Users report creating guides in under 30 minutes
Backed by Microsoft’s support network, with docs, forums, and technical guides.
Enterprise plans add dedicated channels and SLA-backed help.
Benefit from the broad Azure partner ecosystem and vibrant dev community.
Supplies rich docs, tutorials, cookbooks, and FAQs to get you started fast.
Developer Docs
Offers quick email and in-app chat support—Premium and Enterprise plans add dedicated managers and faster SLAs.
Enterprise Solutions
Benefits from an active user community plus integrations through Zapier and GitHub resources.
No- Code Interface & Usability
4.8/5 ease of use rating on G2
"Ease of use" mentioned 32 times in G2 reviews
Visual drag-and-drop editor requires no coding
Small learning curve - non-technical teams productive quickly
Guide creation in under 30 minutes reported by users
Pre-built templates for common scenarios
Intuitive interface for support teams
Note: Some navigation confusion reported in admin interface
Note: Cannot edit on mobile devices
Azure portal UI makes managing indexes and settings straightforward.
Low-code connectors (PowerApps, Logic Apps) help non-devs integrate search quickly.
Complex indexing tweaks may still need a tech-savvy hand compared with turnkey tools.
Offers a wizard-style web dashboard so non-devs can upload content, brand the widget, and monitor performance.
Supports drag-and-drop uploads, visual theme editing, and in-browser chatbot testing.
User Experience Review
Uses role-based access so business users and devs can collaborate smoothly.
R A G-as-a- Service Assessment
Note: NOT a RAG-as-a-Service platform - fundamentally a knowledge base tool with embedded AI
Data source flexibility: Limited (PDF, public web, Zendesk only) vs comprehensive RAG platforms
LLM model options: None (undisclosed proprietary model, no user selection)
API-first architecture: Weak (widget-focused, limited SDKs, no server-side SDKs)
Performance benchmarks: Not published
Self-service AI pricing: Not available (Enterprise-gated, ~$39K/year)
Help desk integration depth: Excellent (best-in-class Zendesk, Salesforce, Freshdesk)
Hallucination controls: Strong (grounded in structured content)
Best for: Customer support ticket deflection, not flexible RAG backends
Not ideal for: Developers seeking pure RAG API, multi-tenant SaaS RAG backends, use cases needing model selection/fine-tuning
Platform Type: TRUE ENTERPRISE RAG-AS-A-SERVICE PLATFORM - Agent Operating System for trusted enterprise AI with unified Agentic RAG and production-grade infrastructure
Core Mission: Enable enterprises to deploy AI assistants and autonomous agents with grounded answers, safe actions, and always-on governance for mission-critical applications
Target Market: Enterprise organizations requiring production-ready RAG with factual consistency scoring, development teams needing white-label search/chat APIs, companies with dedicated VPC or on-prem deployment requirements
RAG Implementation: Proprietary Mockingbird LLM outperforming GPT-4 on BERT F1 scores (26% better) with 0.9% hallucination rate, hybrid search (semantic + BM25), advanced multi-stage reranking pipeline
Managed Service: Usage-based SaaS with generous free tier, then scalable bundles—plus dedicated VPC or on-premise deployment options for enterprise data sovereignty
Pricing Model: Free trial (30-day access to enterprise features), usage-based pricing for query volume and data size, custom pricing for dedicated VPC and on-premise installations
Data Sources: Connectors for cloud storage and enterprise systems with automatic syncing, comprehensive document type support (PDF, DOCX, HTML), all processed into embeddings for semantic search
Model Ecosystem: Proprietary Mockingbird/Mockingbird-2 optimized for RAG, GPT-4/GPT-3.5 fallback via Azure OpenAI, Hughes HHEM for hallucination detection, Hallucination Correction Model (HCM)
Security & Compliance: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA ready with BAAs, encryption (TLS 1.3 in-transit, AES-256 at-rest), customer-managed keys (BYOK), private VPC/on-prem deployments
Support Model: Enterprise support with dedicated channels and SLAs, Microsoft support network backing, comprehensive API documentation, active community forums
Funding & Stability: $53.5M total raised ($25M Series A July 2024 from FPV Ventures and Race Capital) demonstrating strong investor confidence and long-term viability
LIMITATION - Enterprise Complexity: Advanced capabilities require developer expertise—complex indexing, parameter tuning, agent configuration not suitable for non-technical teams
LIMITATION - No No-Code Builder: Azure portal UI for management but no drag-and-drop chatbot builder—requires development resources for deployment
LIMITATION - Ecosystem Lock-In: Strongest with Azure services—less seamless for AWS/GCP-native organizations requiring cross-cloud flexibility
Comparison Validity: Architectural comparison to simpler chatbot platforms like CustomGPT.ai requires context—Vectara targets enterprise RAG infrastructure vs no-code chatbot deployment
Use Case Fit: Perfect for enterprises requiring mission-critical RAG with factual consistency scoring, regulated industries (health, legal, finance) needing SOC 2/HIPAA compliance, organizations building white-label search APIs for customer-facing applications, and companies needing dedicated VPC/on-prem deployments for data sovereignty
Core Architecture: Serverless RAG infrastructure with automatic embedding generation, vector search optimization, and LLM orchestration fully managed behind API endpoints
API-First Design: Comprehensive REST API with well-documented endpoints for creating agents, managing projects, ingesting data (1,400+ formats), and querying chat
API Documentation
Developer Experience: Open-source Python SDK (customgpt-client), Postman collections, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, and extensive cookbooks for rapid integration
No-Code Alternative: Wizard-style web dashboard enables non-developers to upload content, brand widgets, and deploy chatbots without touching code
Hybrid Target Market: Serves both developer teams wanting robust APIs AND business users seeking no-code RAG deployment - unique positioning vs pure API platforms (Cohere) or pure no-code tools (Jotform)
RAG Technology Leadership: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, proprietary anti-hallucination mechanisms, and citation-backed responses
Benchmark Details
Deployment Flexibility: Cloud-hosted SaaS with auto-scaling, API integrations, embedded chat widgets, ChatGPT Plugin support, and hosted MCP Server for Claude/Cursor/ChatGPT
Enterprise Readiness: SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling, domain allowlisting, RBAC with 2FA/SSO, and flat-rate pricing without per-query charges
Use Case Fit: Ideal for organizations needing both rapid no-code deployment AND robust API capabilities, teams handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), and businesses requiring production-ready RAG without building ML infrastructure from scratch
Competitive Positioning: Bridges the gap between developer-first platforms (Cohere, Deepset) requiring heavy coding and no-code chatbot builders (Jotform, Kommunicate) lacking API depth - offers best of both worlds
Competitive Positioning
Unique strength: Interactive guide format for structured support content
vs CustomGPT: Not comparable - different product categories (knowledge base vs RAG-as-a-Service)
vs Zendesk: Lighter-weight alternative focused on self-service guides vs full customer service platform
vs traditional chatbots: Interactive guides provide structured paths vs free-form conversation
Target audience: Support teams using Zendesk/Salesforce, not developers building RAG applications
70-76% ticket reduction documented in case studies
71% self-serve success rate with AI Answers
Enterprise compliance suitable for regulated industries
Market position: Enterprise RAG platform with proprietary Mockingbird LLM and hybrid search capabilities, positioned between Azure AI Search and specialized chatbot builders
Target customers: Enterprise organizations requiring production-ready RAG with factual consistency scoring, development teams needing white-label search/chat APIs, and companies wanting Azure integration with dedicated VPC or on-prem deployment options
Key competitors: Azure AI Search, Coveo, OpenAI Enterprise, Pinecone Assistant, and enterprise RAG platforms
Competitive advantages: Proprietary Mockingbird LLM optimized for RAG with GPT-4/GPT-3.5 fallback options, hybrid search blending semantic and keyword matching, factual-consistency scoring with hallucination detection, comprehensive SDKs (C#, Python, Java, JavaScript), SOC 2/ISO/GDPR/HIPAA compliance with customer-managed keys, Azure ecosystem integration (Logic Apps, Power BI), and millisecond response times at enterprise scale
Pricing advantage: Usage-based with generous free tier, then scalable bundles; competitive for high-volume enterprise queries; dedicated VPC or on-prem for cost control at massive scale; best value for organizations needing enterprise-grade search + RAG + hallucination detection without building infrastructure
Use case fit: Ideal for enterprises requiring mission-critical RAG with factual consistency scoring, organizations needing white-label search APIs for customer-facing applications, and companies wanting Azure ecosystem integration with hybrid search capabilities and advanced reranking for high-accuracy requirements
Market position: Leading all-in-one RAG platform balancing enterprise-grade accuracy with developer-friendly APIs and no-code usability for rapid deployment
Target customers: Mid-market to enterprise organizations needing production-ready AI assistants, development teams wanting robust APIs without building RAG infrastructure, and businesses requiring 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription (YouTube, podcasts)
Key competitors: OpenAI Assistants API, Botsonic, Chatbase.co, Azure AI, and custom RAG implementations using LangChain
Competitive advantages: Industry-leading answer accuracy (median 5/5 benchmarked), 1,400+ file format support with auto-transcription, SOC 2 Type II + GDPR compliance, full white-labeling included, OpenAI API endpoint compatibility, hosted MCP Server support (Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT), generous data limits (60M words Standard, 300M Premium), and flat monthly pricing without per-query charges
Pricing advantage: Transparent flat-rate pricing at $99/month (Standard) and $449/month (Premium) with generous included limits; no hidden costs for API access, branding removal, or basic features; best value for teams needing both no-code dashboard and developer APIs in one platform
Use case fit: Ideal for businesses needing both rapid no-code deployment and robust API capabilities, organizations handling diverse content types (1,400+ formats, multimedia transcription), teams requiring white-label chatbots with source citations for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects, and companies wanting all-in-one RAG without managing ML infrastructure
A I Models
Undisclosed Proprietary LLM: Stonly does not publicly disclose the specific model powering AI Answers feature
No Model Selection: Users cannot choose between GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, or other LLM providers
No Temperature Controls: No user-facing controls for adjusting response creativity, randomness, or formatting
No Fine-Tuning or Model Routing: Cannot customize model behavior beyond predefined AI Profiles and Custom Instructions
AI Profiles (Up to 20): Define tone, boundaries, and behavior for different use cases or audiences
Custom Instructions (Up to 100): Set specific rules and style guidelines for AI response generation
Guided AI Answers: Predefined responses for specific questions bypassing AI generation for sensitive scenarios
Automatic Fallback: Low-confidence scenarios trigger fallback to ML-powered search rather than forcing unreliable AI answer
Knowledge-Grounded Approach: AI responses anchored in Stonly guides, external websites, and PDFs to reduce hallucinations
Proprietary Mockingbird LLM: RAG-specific fine-tuned model achieving 26% better performance than GPT-4 on BERT F1 scores with 0.9% hallucination rate
Mockingbird 2: Latest evolution with advanced cross-lingual capabilities (English, Spanish, French, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Korean) and under 10B parameters
GPT-4/GPT-3.5 fallback: Azure OpenAI integration for customers preferring OpenAI models over Mockingbird
Model selection: Choose between Mockingbird (optimized for RAG), GPT-4 (general intelligence), or GPT-3.5 (cost-effective) based on use case requirements
Hughes Hallucination Evaluation Model (HHEM): Integrated hallucination detection scoring every response for factual consistency
Hallucination Correction Model (HCM): Mockingbird-2-Echo (MB2-Echo) combines Mockingbird 2 with HHEM and HCM for 0.9% hallucination rate
No model training on customer data: Vectara guarantees your data never used to train or improve models, ensuring compliance with strictest security standards
Customizable prompt templates: Configure tone, format, and citation rules through prompt engineering for domain-specific responses
Primary models: GPT-4, GPT-3.5 Turbo from OpenAI, and Anthropic's Claude for enterprise needs
Automatic model selection: Balances cost and performance by automatically selecting the appropriate model for each request
Model Selection Details
Proprietary optimizations: Custom prompt engineering and retrieval enhancements for high-quality, citation-backed answers
Managed infrastructure: All model management handled behind the scenes - no API keys or fine-tuning required from users
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms ensure chatbot only answers based on provided content, improving trust and factual accuracy
R A G Capabilities
AI Answers (Enterprise Add-On): Generative AI responses grounded in Stonly guides, external websites, and selected PDFs
Knowledge-Grounding: Responses anchored to structured content (interactive guides, decision trees, checklists) reducing hallucinations vs generic chatbots
Confidence-Based Fallback: Automatic switch to ML-powered search when AI confidence is low preventing unreliable answers
Multi-Source Ingestion: PDF uploads, public website crawling, Zendesk help center content indexing
Interactive Guide Format: Proprietary content model combining structured workflows with AI-generated answers
Limited Data Sources: No Google Drive, Dropbox, Notion, SharePoint, or YouTube transcript extraction
Manual Content Updates: Updates through Stonly's visual editor—no automatic syncing from external sources
71% Self-Serve Success Rate: Documented effectiveness of AI Answers in reducing support escalations
Hallucination Controls: Strong grounding in structured content vs open-ended conversational AI
Hybrid search architecture: Combines semantic vector search with keyword (BM25) matching for pinpoint retrieval accuracy
Advanced reranking: Multi-stage reranking pipeline with relevance scoring optimizes retrieved results before generation
Factual consistency scoring: Every response includes factual-consistency score (Hughes HHEM) indicating answer reliability and grounding quality
Citation precision/recall: Mockingbird outperforms GPT-4 on citation metrics, ensuring responses traceable to source documents
Fine-grain indexing control: Set chunk sizes, metadata tags, and retrieval parameters for domain-specific optimization
Semantic/lexical weight tuning: Adjust how much weight semantic vs keyword search receives per query type
Multilingual RAG: Full cross-lingual functionality - query in one language, retrieve documents in another, generate summaries in third language
Structured output support: Extract specific information from documents for structured insights and autonomous agent integration
Zero data leakage: Sensitive data never leaves controlled environment on SaaS or customer VPC/on-premise installs
Core architecture: GPT-4 combined with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology, outperforming OpenAI in RAG benchmarks
RAG Performance
Anti-hallucination technology: Advanced mechanisms reduce hallucinations and ensure responses are grounded in provided content
Benchmark Details
Automatic citations: Each response includes clickable citations pointing to original source documents for transparency and verification
Optimized pipeline: Efficient vector search, smart chunking, and caching for sub-second reply times
Scalability: Maintains speed and accuracy for massive knowledge bases with tens of millions of words
Context-aware conversations: Multi-turn conversations with persistent history and comprehensive conversation management
Source verification: Always cites sources so users can verify facts on the spot
Use Cases
Customer Support Ticket Deflection: 70-76% ticket reduction through interactive self-service guides and AI Answers
Help Desk Integration: Deep Zendesk, Salesforce Service Cloud, Freshdesk, ServiceNow integration for unified support workflows
Interactive Onboarding: Step-by-step guides, decision trees, and checklists for product onboarding and user education
Knowledge Base Enhancement: Augment traditional help centers with interactive guides and AI-powered search
Agent Assistance: Provide support agents with guided workflows and AI answers during live interactions
Multi-Language Support: Auto-translation on Enterprise plan for global support teams and multilingual customers
Complex Troubleshooting: Decision tree logic guides users through multi-step troubleshooting processes
Compliance & Training: Structured guides ensuring consistent information delivery for regulated industries
Regulated industry RAG: Perfect for health, legal, finance, manufacturing where accuracy, security, and explainability critical (SOC 2 Type 2 compliance)
Enterprise knowledge bases: Summarize search results for research/analysis, build Q&A systems providing quick precise answers from large document repositories
Autonomous agents: Structured outputs provide significant advantage for AI agents requiring deterministic data extraction and decision-making
Customer-facing search APIs: White-label search/chat APIs for customer applications with millisecond response times at enterprise scale
Cross-lingual knowledge retrieval: Organizations requiring multilingual support (7 languages) with single knowledge base serving multiple locales
High-accuracy requirements: Use cases demanding citation precision, factual consistency scoring, and hallucination detection (0.9% rate with Mockingbird-2-Echo)
Azure ecosystem integration: Companies using Azure Logic Apps, Power BI, and GCP services wanting seamless RAG integration
Customer support automation: AI assistants handling common queries, reducing support ticket volume, providing 24/7 instant responses with source citations
Internal knowledge management: Employee self-service for HR policies, technical documentation, onboarding materials, company procedures across 1,400+ file formats
Sales enablement: Product information chatbots, lead qualification, customer education with white-labeled widgets on websites and apps
Documentation assistance: Technical docs, help centers, FAQs with automatic website crawling and sitemap indexing
Educational platforms: Course materials, research assistance, student support with multimedia content (YouTube transcriptions, podcasts)
Healthcare information: Patient education, medical knowledge bases (SOC 2 Type II compliant for sensitive data)
No hidden fees: Transparent pricing with no per-seat charges, no storage surprises, no model switching fees
Competitive for enterprise: Best value for organizations needing enterprise-grade RAG + hybrid search + hallucination detection without building infrastructure
Funding: $53.5M total raised ($25M Series A in July 2024 from FPV Ventures and Race Capital) demonstrating strong investor confidence
Standard Plan: $99/month or $89/month annual - 10 custom chatbots, 5,000 items per chatbot, 60 million words per bot, basic helpdesk support, standard security
View Pricing
Premium Plan: $499/month or $449/month annual - 100 custom chatbots, 20,000 items per chatbot, 300 million words per bot, advanced support, enhanced security, additional customization
Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing - Comprehensive AI solutions, highest security and compliance, dedicated account managers, custom SSO, token authentication, priority support with faster SLAs
Enterprise Solutions
7-Day Free Trial: Full access to Standard features without charges - available to all users
Annual billing discount: Save 10% by paying upfront annually ($89/mo Standard, $449/mo Premium)
Flat monthly rates: No per-query charges, no hidden costs for API access or white-labeling (included in all plans)
Managed infrastructure: Auto-scaling cloud infrastructure included - no additional hosting or scaling fees
Support & Documentation
4.8/5 G2 Rating: 132 reviews with consistently high satisfaction scores
Ease of Use Praised: "Ease of use" mentioned 32 times in G2 reviews indicating intuitive platform
Help Center Documentation: Comprehensive guides and tutorials for platform features
Email and Chat Support: Standard support channels for all paid plans
Dedicated Support (Enterprise): Priority support with dedicated account team and faster response times
Pre-Built Templates: Common support scenario templates accelerating guide creation
Quick Onboarding: Users report creating guides in under 30 minutes with small learning curve
REST API Documentation: API reference for user provisioning, content management, and widget control
Mobile SDKs (Enterprise): iOS, Android, React Native, Flutter for native app integration
Limited Developer Resources: No Python/Node.js SDKs, GraphQL, OpenAPI specs, or API Explorer/sandbox
Enterprise support: Dedicated support channels and SLA-backed help for Enterprise plan customers
Microsoft support network: Backed by Microsoft's extensive support infrastructure, documentation, forums, and technical guides
Comprehensive documentation: Detailed API references, integration guides, SDK documentation, and best practices at docs.vectara.com
Azure partner ecosystem: Benefit from broad Azure partner network and vibrant developer community
Sample code and notebooks: Pre-built examples, Jupyter notebooks, and quick-start guides for rapid integration
Community forums: Active developer community for peer support, knowledge sharing, and best practice discussions
Regular updates: Constant stream of new features and integrations keeps platform fresh with R&D investment
API/SDK support: C#, Python, Java, JavaScript SDKs with comprehensive documentation and code samples
Documentation hub: Rich docs, tutorials, cookbooks, FAQs, API references for rapid onboarding
Developer Docs
Email and in-app support: Quick support via email and in-app chat for all users
Premium support: Premium and Enterprise plans include dedicated account managers and faster SLAs
Code samples: Cookbooks, step-by-step guides, and examples for every skill level
API Documentation
No Real-Time Analytics: Flow reports update every 15 minutes—not true real-time monitoring
Limited Developer API: No Python/Node.js SDKs, GraphQL, Swagger specs, or API sandbox for testing
Overage Pricing Escalation: View limits can trigger expensive automatic upgrades after 2 consecutive months
Not Ideal For: Developers seeking pure RAG API, multi-tenant SaaS RAG backends, use cases needing model selection/fine-tuning, or flexible data source integration
Azure/Microsoft ecosystem focus: Strongest integration with Azure services - less seamless for AWS/GCP-native organizations
Complex indexing requires technical skills: Advanced indexing tweaks and parameter tuning need developer expertise vs turnkey no-code tools
No drag-and-drop GUI: Azure portal UI for management, but no full no-code chatbot builder like Tidio or WonderChat
Model selection limited: Mockingbird, GPT-4, GPT-3.5 only - no Claude, Gemini, or custom model support compared to multi-model platforms
Learning curve for non-Azure users: Teams unfamiliar with Azure ecosystem face steeper learning curve vs platform-agnostic alternatives
Pricing transparency: Contact sales for detailed enterprise pricing - less transparent than self-serve platforms with public pricing
Overkill for simple chatbots: Enterprise RAG capabilities unnecessary for basic FAQ bots or simple customer service automation
Requires development resources: Not suitable for non-technical teams needing no-code deployment without developer involvement
Managed service approach: Less control over underlying RAG pipeline configuration compared to build-your-own solutions like LangChain
Vendor lock-in: Proprietary platform - migration to alternative RAG solutions requires rebuilding knowledge bases
Model selection: Limited to OpenAI (GPT-4, GPT-3.5) and Anthropic (Claude) - no support for other LLM providers (Cohere, AI21, open-source models)
Pricing at scale: Flat-rate pricing may become expensive for very high-volume use cases (millions of queries/month) compared to pay-per-use models
Customization limits: While highly configurable, some advanced RAG techniques (custom reranking, hybrid search strategies) may not be exposed
Language support: Supports 90+ languages but performance may vary for less common languages or specialized domains
Real-time data: Knowledge bases require re-indexing for updates - not ideal for real-time data requirements (stock prices, live inventory)
Enterprise features: Some advanced features (custom SSO, token authentication) only available on Enterprise plan with custom pricing
Core Agent Features
Conversational AI Bot: Delivers confident answers backed by verified structured knowledge unlike generic LLMs that can hallucinate or invent answers
Knowledge-grounded responses: Provides answers backed by verified structured knowledge from guides you create preventing fabricated information
AI Agent Assist: Automatically summarizes tickets, suggests right path to resolution, and generates responses for support agents
Three core automation functions: Automatically analyzes and summarizes support ticket content, recommends most relevant Stonly guide/knowledge path to resolve issues, drafts complete responses for agents to review/edit/send
Process automation: Define processes to be followed and link them to different back-office tools to resolve customer requests before they reach support
Personalized knowledge: AI-powered solutions and process automation allow creation of guides, walkthroughs, checklists, knowledge bases adapting to each customer's needs
71% self-serve success rate: With AI Answers feature documented in company data
Hallucination reduction: Knowledge-grounding approach vs generic chatbots reduces off-topic responses
Agentic RAG Framework: Vectara-agentic Python library enables AI assistants and autonomous agents going beyond Q&A to act on users' behalf (sending emails, booking flights, system integration)
Agent APIs (Tech Preview): Comprehensive framework enabling intelligent autonomous AI agents with customizable reasoning models, behavioral instructions, and tool access controls
Configurable Digital Workers: Create agents capable of complex reasoning, multi-step workflows, and enterprise system integration with fine-grained access controls
LlamaIndex Agent Framework: Built on LlamaIndex with helper functions for rapid tool creation connecting to Vectara corpora—single-line code for tool generation
Multiple Agent Types: Support for ReAct agents, Function Calling agents, and custom agent architectures for different reasoning patterns
Pre-Built Domain Tools: Finance and legal industry-specific tools with specialized retrieval and analysis capabilities for regulated sectors
Multi-LLM Agent Support: Agents integrate with OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, GROQ, Together.AI, Cohere, and AWS Bedrock for flexible model selection
Structured Output Extraction: Extract specific information from documents for deterministic data extraction and autonomous agent decision-making
Step-Level Audit Trails: Every agent action logged with source citations, reasoning steps, and decision paths for governance and compliance
Real-Time Policy Enforcement: Fine-grained access controls, factual-consistency checks, and policy guardrails enforced during agent execution
Multi-Turn Agent Conversations: Conversation history retention across dialogue turns for coherent long-running agent interactions
Grounded Agent Actions: All agent decisions grounded in retrieved documents with source citations and hallucination detection (0.9% rate with Mockingbird-2-Echo)
LIMITATION - Developer Platform: Agent APIs require programming expertise—not suitable for non-technical teams without developer support
LIMITATION - No Built-In Chatbot UI: Developer-focused platform without polished chat widgets or turnkey conversational interfaces for end users
LIMITATION - No Lead Capture Features: No built-in lead generation, email collection, or CRM integration workflows—application layer responsibility
LIMITATION - Tech Preview Status: Agent APIs in tech preview (2024)—features subject to change before general availability release
Custom AI Agents: Build autonomous agents powered by GPT-4 and Claude that can perform tasks independently and make real-time decisions based on business knowledge
Decision-Support Capabilities: AI agents analyze proprietary data to provide insights, recommendations, and actionable responses specific to your business domain
Multi-Agent Systems: Deploy multiple specialized AI agents that can collaborate and optimize workflows in areas like customer support, sales, and internal knowledge management
Memory & Context Management: Agents maintain conversation history and persistent context for coherent multi-turn interactions
View Agent Documentation
Tool Integration: Agents can trigger actions, integrate with external APIs via webhooks, and connect to 5,000+ apps through Zapier for automated workflows
Hyper-Accurate Responses: Leverages advanced RAG technology and retrieval mechanisms to deliver context-aware, citation-backed responses grounded in your knowledge base
Continuous Learning: Agents improve over time through automatic re-indexing of knowledge sources and integration of new data without manual retraining
Additional Considerations
Limited UI customization: Limited ability to customize user interface and workflows to match specific brand requirements is primary user concern
Basic collaboration tools: Without real-time editing or advanced team management features can hinder team productivity when multiple people need to work together
No offline access: Guides unavailable without internet connectivity reducing usability in areas with unreliable internet
Performance degradation: Can degrade with very large or complex guides causing slower responsiveness indicating scalability concerns
Restricted language options: Limit efficient creation of multilingual content which may be barrier for global organizations
Mixed media support missing: Users find missing features wishing for mixed media support and enhanced reporting tools
Step ordering difficulties: Users report limitations in feature usability and difficulties with step ordering though support offers helpful workarounds
Requires coding knowledge: Unlike most competitors, doesn't advertise as no-code platform - need coding knowledge to track events, target users, stream data, and style content
Image workflow limitations: Inability to use images in base offering limits utility in some workflows with some advanced features requiring extra costs
View-based pricing: Charges additional fees based on guide views - customers exceeding 4,000 guide views/month pay extra $250-500 monthly depending on volume
Integration reliability: Users find lack of integrations limits ability to fully connect Stonly with other tools - Stonly/Zendesk integration isn't as reliable as desired (stops working every few weeks)
Hybrid search + reranking gives each answer a unique factual-consistency score.
Deploy in public cloud, VPC, or on-prem to suit your compliance needs.
Constant stream of new features and integrations keeps the platform fresh.
Slashes engineering overhead with an all-in-one RAG platform—no in-house ML team required.
Gets you to value quickly: launch a functional AI assistant in minutes.
Stays current with ongoing GPT and retrieval improvements, so you’re always on the latest tech.
Balances top-tier accuracy with ease of use, perfect for customer-facing or internal knowledge projects.
CSS and HTML customization: Change layout and look of knowledge base with custom code capabilities
Intuitive customization tools: Easy-to-use tools that don't require code for basic customization
Layout customization: Decide how content is structured and presented with flexible options
Design controls: Manage visual components like colors, logo, or cover image for brand alignment
Personalized content: Use customer data to show personalized content from knowledge base for targeted experiences
Data-driven personalization: Customers see what they need right away when first accessing knowledge base
Analytics insights: Guide usage analytics provide insight into customer behavior for continuous improvement
Highly flexible platform: Users appreciate ability to use Stonly for knowledge bases and guided tours with target properties based on specific user needs
Rich media support: Add images, GIFs, videos, and annotations to bring knowledge base content to life
Third-party scripts: Install scripts from other tools like Google Analytics for extended functionality
Fine-grain control over indexing—set chunk sizes, metadata tags, and more.
Tune how much weight semantic vs. lexical search gets for each query.
Adjust prompt templates and relevance thresholds to fit domain-specific needs.
Lets you add, remove, or tweak content on the fly—automatic re-indexing keeps everything current.
Shapes agent behavior through system prompts and sample Q&A, ensuring a consistent voice and focus.
Learn How to Update Sources
Supports multiple agents per account, so different teams can have their own bots.
Balances hands-on control with smart defaults—no deep ML expertise required to get tailored behavior.
After analyzing features, pricing, performance, and user feedback, both Stonly and Vectara are capable platforms that serve different market segments and use cases effectively.
When to Choose Stonly
You value exceptional ease of use - 4.8/5 g2 rating with intuitive visual editor praised in 32 reviews
Deep help desk integrations - bidirectional Zendesk, Salesforce, Freshdesk, ServiceNow connections
Strong compliance - SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, HIPAA, ISO 27001, PCI, CSA Star Level 1
Best For: Exceptional ease of use - 4.8/5 G2 rating with intuitive visual editor praised in 32 reviews
When to Choose Vectara
You value industry-leading accuracy with minimal hallucinations
Never trains on customer data - ensures privacy
True serverless architecture - no infrastructure management
Best For: Industry-leading accuracy with minimal hallucinations
Migration & Switching Considerations
Switching between Stonly and Vectara requires careful planning. Consider data export capabilities, API compatibility, and integration complexity. Both platforms offer migration support, but expect 2-4 weeks for complete transition including testing and team training.
Pricing Comparison Summary
Stonly starts at $249/month, while Vectara begins at custom pricing. Total cost of ownership should factor in implementation time, training requirements, API usage fees, and ongoing support. Enterprise deployments typically see annual costs ranging from $10,000 to $500,000+ depending on scale and requirements.
Our Recommendation Process
Start with a free trial - Both platforms offer trial periods to test with your actual data
Define success metrics - Response accuracy, latency, user satisfaction, cost per query
Test with real use cases - Don't rely on generic demos; use your production data
Evaluate total cost - Factor in implementation time, training, and ongoing maintenance
Check vendor stability - Review roadmap transparency, update frequency, and support quality
For most organizations, the decision between Stonly and Vectara comes down to specific requirements rather than overall superiority. Evaluate both platforms with your actual data during trial periods, focusing on accuracy, latency, ease of integration, and total cost of ownership.
📚 Next Steps
Ready to make your decision? We recommend starting with a hands-on evaluation of both platforms using your specific use case and data.
• Review: Check the detailed feature comparison table above
• Test: Sign up for free trials and test with real queries
• Calculate: Estimate your monthly costs based on expected usage
• Decide: Choose the platform that best aligns with your requirements
Last updated: December 4, 2025 | This comparison is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the latest platform capabilities, pricing, and user feedback.
The most accurate RAG-as-a-Service API. Deliver production-ready reliable RAG applications faster. Benchmarked #1 in accuracy and hallucinations for fully managed RAG-as-a-Service API.
DevRel at CustomGPT.ai. Passionate about AI and its applications. Here to help you navigate the world of AI tools and make informed decisions for your business.
People Also Compare
Explore more AI tool comparisons to find the perfect solution for your needs
Join the Discussion
Loading comments...